Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
169 judgments · newest first · showing 1–169
The applicant, Pankak Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 857 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 281, 125(1), 125(b) and 106(1) of the B.N.S. A compromise between the parties had been reached and subsequently verified by the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, summons and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 859 of 2023, which arose from a complaint under Sections 323 and 506 IPC. A compromise between the parties had been reached and subsequently …
The applicants, accused of assault and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita arising from a land dispute, obtained anticipatory bail from the Additional Sessions Judge, but the bail was limited to 30 days despite the charge‑sheet already being filed. The applicants contended that such a …
The applicant Subhash Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and summoning order dated 14 May 2025 in Criminal Case No. 451 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant argued that …
The applicant, a police inspector, sought quashing of a charge‑sheet and criminal proceedings arising from an FIR alleging rape, assault, blackmail and offences under the IT Act. The victim alleged that the applicant deceived her with a false promise of marriage, spiked her drink, recorded obscene …
The applicant filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking relief against unauthorized constructions on a public path. The State complied with the court's earlier order and demolished the illegal structures. The applicant argued that, with the demolition completed, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, summons and the entire criminal proceedings (Case Crime No. 456 of 2023) relating to offences under Sections 323, 504 and 325 IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise which was …
Shadab Khan filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the order dated 11 November 2025 that framed charges against him in Sessions Trial No. 45 of 2025. The applicant argued that the trial court had not complied with the mandatory procedural provisions of Sections 230, 261, …
The applicant, Dr. Tauseef Ahmad Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of criminal proceedings (case crime no. 95 of 2025) pending before the Sambhal trial court. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and the trial court verified the compromise on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑06‑2023 and a summoning order dated 17‑08‑2023 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑3, Ghaziabad, in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406 and …
The applicant Jagwati filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 244 of 2015) and the charge sheet relating to an alleged insurance fraud where a policy was purportedly issued in the name of a deceased person. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, alleging that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 17 September 2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of Criminal Case No. 29936 of 2023 (State vs. Smt. Sajida Begum & Another), which involved offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 506 and 120‑B IPC. During the pendency of the application the parties entered …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 23.01.2023 and the cognizance order dated 05.07.2023 that had summoned them under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The opposite party contended that, according to the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 07‑02‑2024. The trial court had earlier been directed to verify the …
The applicant Masook Ali filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order, summons and the entire criminal proceedings for an alleged abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC. He contended that the investigation material – a disputed suicide …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑05‑2025, the summoning order dated 23‑06‑2025, and the entire proceedings in case No. 8170 of 2025, alleging that the prosecution was malicious and intended to harass them. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 27-08-2024. The trial court confirmed the parties' settlement, and the …
The applicant, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, was summoned under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC in Criminal Case No. 15119 of 2022. He filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order, arguing that the two offences cannot arise from the same set of …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the summoning order dated 4 April 2024 in Criminal Case No. 24805 of 2024, wherein he was charged under Sections 420, 406, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The crux of the dispute was …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quashment of criminal proceedings after reaching an amicable settlement with the respondents. The trial court verified the compromise on 2 June 2026, and both parties, including the State, did not contest the settlement. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 02-06-2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and both the State's A.G.A. and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 07-03-2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and both the State’s A.G.A. and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 365 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 308 and 325 of the IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise that was verified …
The applicants, Yusuf and another, filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking discharge of the accused, asserting that the dispute with the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent had been amicably settled and a compromise was filed. The trial court verified the compromise on …
The applicant, Umanand Upadhyay, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case alleging theft of a cheque payment register, forgery and criminal breach of trust. The key issue was whether officers of a cooperative …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. It allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 07-09-2024 and the cognizance order dated 23-09-2024 in case No. 5709 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 147, 392 and 325 of the IPC. They …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 09-03-2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
The applicant, Chandra Bhushan Tripathi, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge-sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh. He did not wish to contest the merits but requested liberty to file a …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1015 of 2022, which arose from charges under Sections 323, 406, 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant alleged that the prosecution was instituted with a mala fide …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 24-04-2025 and to obtain liberty to file a bail application before the trial court. The counsel for the applicants did not contest the merits of the underlying criminal case but requested …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and proceedings in a case under Sections 323 and 504 IPC, alleging that these offences are non‑cognizable. They argued that, per the Explanation to Section 2(d) of the CrPC, a police report …
The applicant, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and all proceedings in Criminal Case No. 52021 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 308(4) and 351(2) of the BNSS. A compromise between the parties had been reached and …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar Dharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a murder case arising from the death of Nikita Dharma. The prosecution alleged that the applicant assaulted and threatened the deceased and that …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S. application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the summoning order dated 15 July 2025 in Criminal Case No. 12081, alleging that they were charged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) B.N.S. which, according to Supreme Court precedent, cannot be invoked …
The applicant, Pramod Kumar Pathak, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and summons dated 6 September 2025 in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. He contended that no prima facie case existed and …
The applicant Sandeep filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash a supplementary charge‑sheet (No. 81‑A/2024) and the cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 4228 of 2025. The charge‑sheet was filed after a second investigation was conducted without the magistrate’s permission under …
The applicants Kamran and others were charged under several IPC sections for assaulting police officers on 19 April 2024. They filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order rejecting their discharge application and the framing of charges. The High Court examined …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge-sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 20880 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 406, 147, 504, 506 and 307 IPC, on the ground that a compromise had been reached and verified by the …
The applicant, Asheesh Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge-sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings arising from FIR No. 29‑03‑2025, which alleged that he, along with co‑accused, verbally abused and assaulted the complainant's …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a compromise in a criminal matter. Earlier, both sides had indicated willingness to settle, but a misunderstanding prevented a final agreement. The opposite party’s counsel asserted that no genuine …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of a charge order dated 12‑12‑2025 and the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 2009 of 2025, relating to offences under Sections 323, 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The counsel argued that no offence was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and all proceedings in Criminal Case No. 3403/9 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506 and 336 of the IPC and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. During …
The applicant, Smt Amna Begum, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 1502515 of 2016) arising from an FIR dated 2000 that alleged offences under Sections 206, 406, 418, 419, 420, 424 and 120‑B of the IPC. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and the initiation of proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 CrPC in a criminal case (Crime No. 599 of 2018). The applicant argued that unavoidable circumstances prevented his …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and the cognizance order in a case involving offences under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. They argued that these offences are non‑cognizable and, per the Explanation to Section 2(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 17 April 2025. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 13 March 2026. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1137 of 2010 (State vs. Santosh Kumar Saxena), which involved offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the trial court as …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 28‑02‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 03‑05‑2024, and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No. 480 of 2024 (State vs Hamad @ Hamdu Maya & Ors). They alleged …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 448 of 2017) alleging offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The parties had reached an amicable settlement outside court, and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 31675 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 323, 325 and 308 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement outside court, and the compromise was verified by the trial court …
The applicant, Avshesh Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 107 of 2025) arising from FIR No. 223 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 503, 506 and 153A IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 26‑11‑2025. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second opposite …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, alleging that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 23 March 2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
Akash Nagar filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑01‑2024 and a summoning order dated 21‑06‑2024 in a criminal case where he was charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that, according to the Supreme Court’s …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 22‑01‑2026. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 06‑02‑2026. The State, represented by the learned A.G.A., did not contest the settlement. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court. The trial court had confirmed the settlement on 30.01.2026, and the opposite party 2 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 19‑02‑2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 655 of 2025) on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 30 January 2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute with the State and other respondents had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 19‑02‑2026. The High Court noted that the parties had indeed …
The applicant, Sitaram, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application, stating it should be dismissed as not pressed. The Additional Government Advocate raised no objection …
The applicants Vijay Bahadur Singh and another filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 04‑08‑2024 and the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 9556 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 419, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicants did not …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 30 September 2019 in case crime No. 533 of 2019, which alleged offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16‑10‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 17‑04‑2025, and the entire proceedings in case No. 5174 of 2025 (State v. Jaswant Singh et al.) arising from an alleged …
The applicant filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance and summoning order dated 11 July 2023 in Criminal Case No. 48767 (State v. Kundan & Others), which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that Sections …
The applicant, Hussain Zaidi, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, summons and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 265 of 2025) arising from a Section 420 IPC offence. The applicant alleged that the prosecution was instituted mala …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement, and a copy of the settlement agreement was placed on record. Both counsel acknowledged the settlement. The court held that, in …
The applicants, Rajeev Tayal and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the matter, while counsel for the State and the second opposite party were present. The court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 07.08.2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and both the State and the second …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (S.T.No. 1677 of 2022) relating to offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement and a compromise was verified by the trial court on …
The applicant, Atif Lari, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 478 of 2019) instituted under Section 307 IPC. The applicant, being the husband of the informant, asserted that the dispute had been amicably settled and a …
The applicants, Ramod Singh and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 26085 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. Instead of contesting the merits, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings after the parties settled their dispute amicably and the compromise was verified by the trial court. The trial court confirmed the settlement on 25 June 2025. Both the State and the second opposite …
The applicant, Mangesh Tyagi, filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the BNSS. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Shyam Dhar Yadav, on behalf of Mr. Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, sought to withdraw the application, stating it was not pressed. The opposing party, represented by G.A., raised no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that they had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 19‑05‑2026. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. The High …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking the case diary of Criminal Case No. 913 of 2025 to examine the alleged illegal alteration of the FIR from Section 310 (loot with hurt) to a lesser offence of simple hurt. The charge‑sheet, however, was filed only under …
The applicants, Yogesh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. Their counsel, Shubham Yadav, informed the court that he did not wish to press the application and requested its dismissal, while seeking liberty to file a fresh application later. …
The applicants, Ajay Prakash Tripathi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, while counsel for the State of U.P. was present. The Court dismissed the application in …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 4567 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 452, 323, 308, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement outside court, and the compromise …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 12‑09‑2025. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 04.05.2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
The applicant Jawahar Lal filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge-sheet and summoning order in a case under Section 354 IPC. He alleged that the prosecution was malicious and intended to harass him. The High Court examined whether any of the Supreme …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 09-04-2026. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. …
The applicant, Rajesh Kumar Sharma, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings pending against him. The injury report showed no serious injury and the parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the trial court on 06.01.2025. Both …
The applicants Anil Khattar and others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 51744 of 2023) arising from an FIR lodged on 6 February 2019 alleging that they, as directors of a school, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but their counsel later informed the court that the application should not be pursued due to factual defects in the compromise. The counsel requested that the application be dismissed as not pressed, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 27.05.2021 and the cognizance order dated 11.08.2021 in Criminal Case No. 95762 of 2021, alleging that the prosecution was instituted with mala fide intent. The court examined …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 1281 of 2023, which stemmed from an FIR alleging land fraud, forgery, and assault. The FIR alleged that the applicants, along with others, had fraudulently sold …
The appellants Pranshu Rai and two others appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash the summoning and cognizance order dated 14-10-2025 and the entire Sessions Trial proceedings arising under several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal seeking to quash a summoning order dated 14 January 2026 issued by the Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case arising from alleged offences under several IPC and SC/ST Act provisions. The …
The appellant Raza Khan was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly forcing a consensual relationship, taking obscene photographs, threatening the victim, and attempting to convert her religion, thereby insulting her caste. He filed …
Urmila Devi appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an order dated 17 April 2025 of the Special Judge that directed the police to lodge a First Information Report under Section 173(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case filed under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes …
The appellants Arvind Kumar and two others appealed against a summoning order under Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, claiming no caste‑based abuse was alleged against them in the FIR or statements. The FIR and police statements attributed the alleged beating, caste‑based …
The appellant sought to quash a order of the Special Judge that rejected his application under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. (formerly Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C.) for police investigation of alleged assault and caste‑based abuse. The High Court examined the scope of a magistrate’s discretion …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal seeking to quash the summoning and cognizance order dated 08-08-2025 and the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 1455 of 2025, which arose from Crime No. 124 of 2025 under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled …
The appellant sought to quash a order of the Special Judge that rejected his application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS (formerly Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C.) alleging assault and caste-based abuse by the second respondent, a doctor. The High Court examined the scope of a magistrate's power …
The appellant, Samiruddin, appealed under Section 14-A(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act seeking to quash a summoning order and the proceedings arising from a FIR that alleged offences including criminal intimidation (Section 351(3) BNS) and a scheduled caste/tribe offence (Section …
The appellant Govind Soni filed an appeal seeking to quash the summoning and cognizance order dated 10-10-2024 in Complaint Case No. 62 of 2024, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and Section 3(1)(da)(dha) of the SC/ST Act. He contended that no offence was made out against him …
The appellants were summoned under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions following an altercation arising from an eviction dispute. They contended that the FIR was fabricated, that the alleged victim Priyanka Paswan never lodged a complaint, and that any abusive …
The appellant Rahul alias Rakesh filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire proceedings of a Sessions case involving offences under the Indian Penal …
The appellant, Indal Singh, appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 15 March 2017 and a summoning order dated 4 July 2025 issued by the Special Judge under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant alleged …
The appellant, Saurabh Bhojwal, appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash the summoning order dated 19‑09‑2025 and the entire Special Sessions Trial No. 1222 of 2025 arising from Crime No. 306 of 2025, which involved several IPC offences and provisions of the Special Courts Act. The …
The appellants, Nasir and Guddu, were initially named in an FIR but were later exonerated by the investigating officer after a re‑statement by the complainant on 26 November 2022, resulting in a charge‑sheet only against co‑accused Nanhe and Maqsood. Two years later, during trial, the complainant …
The appellants Vikram and two others appealed against a Special Judge's order rejecting their discharge application under Section 227 Cr.P.C. The case involved charges under Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST Act and Sections 452 and 506 of the IPC. The appellants argued that the alleged insult occurred …
The Allahabad High Court heard Criminal Appeal No. 3016 of 2026 filed by Sukha @ Rafik Khan under Section 14‑A(1) of the SC/ST Act seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and summons relating to alleged offences under the SC/ST Act and the IPC. The appellant alleged that the case was fabricated, stemming …
The appellant Rajkumar Pal filed an appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash the Special Sessions Trial No. 23 of 2026 (State v. Rajkumar Pal) that was instituted under Sections 76, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S. …
The appellant, Jameer @ Chunnoo, appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to quash a summons dated 13 January 2015, a non‑bailable warrant dated 6 July 2023, and the entire Special Sessions Trial …
Vinod Kumar appealed to the Allahabad High Court against a summoning order of a Special Judge who had taken cognizance only of offences under Sections 504 and 506 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, despite the FIR also alleging offences under Sections 420 …
An appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 10124 of 2025) was filed by Akash @ Punita and another against the State of U.P. The appellant's counsel, Sandeep Pandey, informed the court that the appellant no longer wished to pursue the criminal appeal. Counsel for the respondent and the Additional Government …
The appellants, Ajay @ Allu and another, filed Criminal Appeal No. 9676 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging a conviction by the State of U.P. During the hearing, counsel for the appellants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the appeal. Counsel for the respondent …
An appeal was filed before the Allahabad High Court challenging a criminal conviction. The appellant's counsel informed the court that the appellant no longer wished to pursue the appeal. The respondent's counsel and the Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to this request. The court …
Geeta Devi appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to quash the Special Judge’s order that dismissed her complaint under Section 203 Cr.P.C. The trial court had held that the dispute over land was …
The appellants, Prem Chandra Vishwakarma and five others, filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the appellants, Mr. Virendra Kumar Maurya, expressed that the appellants no longer wished to pursue the appeal and requested its dismissal as not …
The appellants filed an appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash a summoning order dated 08‑08‑2024 issued by the Special Judge in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal seeking to quash the cognizance and all proceedings in Sessions Case No. 227 of 2025, which involved offences under the B.N.S. and the SC/ST Act, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise that was verified by the trial court. A coordinate bench of …
Harbhajan Singh appealed against a criminal conviction, but after settling the dispute with the State, both parties entered into a compromise. The appellant's counsel informed the court that the appellant no longer wished to pursue the appeal and requested its dismissal as not pressed. The court …
The appellant Pintoo was charged under the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC offences for an alleged assault. The appellant contended that the FIR and the statements of the informant and eye‑witness did not contain any specific caste‑related …
The appellants, minors, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to quash the cognizance and proceedings of a Sessions case involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the SC/ST Act. They did not …
The appellants, Arvind Pandey and another, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire proceedings of a Special Sessions case. They did not contest the …
The appellant, Shriram, was alleged in a FIR of 28 June 2021 to have participated in an attempt to outrage a woman's modesty and a shooting incident, but the investigating officer exonerated him and did not include him in the charge-sheet. During trial, the Special Judge summoned Shriram under …
The appellant, Bagedu alias Ramansh Raj Singh, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 14 July 2025 issued by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Chandauli. The appellant alleged …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 12‑01‑2023 in a case that also involved offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 354A. Both parties submitted …
The appellants, who are tenants of a house owned by the complainant (a lawyer), were summoned under a criminal complaint alleging assault, theft and caste‑based abuse, invoking IPC 323 and Section 3(1)(da) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The High Court …
The appellants Vedram and two others appealed to quash the summoning order dated 4 October 2023 in Complaint Case No.02 of 2022 (Kumari Sarina Vs. Vedram & Others), alleging that the complaint under IPC sections 452, 354, 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was fabricated. The …
Sanju appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to set aside an order of the Additional Sessions Judge that rejected his application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS. The trial court held that the …
The appellant, Harindra Chauhan, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, challenging the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a case involving multiple IPC offences. The appellant did not contest the merits but sought liberty to file a bail …
The appellant, Umesh Chauhan, filed an appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 27‑11‑2024 and a cognizance order dated 24‑01‑2025 issued by a Special Judge. The appellant alleged that the …
The appellant Ritesh Kumar Srivastav challenged a summoning order dated 5 June 2025 issued by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Varanasi, which had proceeded against him under Sections 504 and 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(da) and 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST Act. The complaint alleged caste‑based abuse linked …
The appellants, Sameer Singh and another, appealed under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act challenging a summoning order dated 27‑02‑2025 issued by the Special Judge, Varanasi, in case Pappu Sonkar v. Sameer Singh & Ors. The order had summoned them to face trial under IPC …
Sunita Singh and another appealed against a Special Court order that partially rejected their discharge application under Section 227 Cr.P.C., leaving them charged under Sections 417, 420 IPC and Section 3(2)(5a) of the SC/ST Act. They contended that Section 3(2)(5a) could not apply because the …
The appellant Kapil Kumar was charged under Sections 302, 201 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act for the alleged murder of his father, Sheeshpal, which the prosecution claimed was a homicide disguised as a road accident. Subsequent investigations, including a Special Investigation Team report …
The appellants challenged the summoning order dated 19‑07‑2025 and the Special Sessions Trial proceedings, alleging that the FIR initially described a simple assault and later was altered to include caste‑based allegations without any supporting evidence. They argued that the informant’s statements …
The appellant was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences for allegedly assaulting and abusing a Scheduled Caste woman in an agricultural field at night. The appellant contended that the "public view" element required by Section …
The appellant, Duryodhan Prasad Arya, purchased a vehicle that was later discovered to be stolen and entered into a compromise for its return, after which the seller failed to refund the purchase price. The appellant filed an application under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to …
The appellant, a Scheduled Caste medical student, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking registration of a cognizable offence under the SC/ST Act after being assaulted and threatened on campus. The Special Judge treated the application as a …
The appellants, bank officials, were summoned by a Special Judge under Section 504 IPC and Sections 3(1)(da) and 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST Act based on a complaint alleging caste‑based abuse and threats in a bank branch. The investigating officer’s inquiry, supported by CCTV footage and statements of …
Jamuna Prasad appealed against the order of the Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act) dated 7 October 2024 which dismissed his second protest petition ex parte on the ground of non‑prosecution. The appellant argued that he could not appear due to illness and that the order was passed without affording him a …
The appellants, Mohd Khalid and another, filed a criminal appeal against the State of U.P. and another. Their counsel, Istyak Khan, informed the court that the dispute had been amicably settled outside the court and that they did not wish to pursue the appeal. The court, upon receiving this …
The appellant, Dheeraj Raj, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four others. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant, Gulab Yadav, informed the court that the dispute had been amicably settled out of court and that the appellant no longer wished to pursue the …
The appellant, Om Prakash, appealed a trial court order that rejected his application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS, filed under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The dispute concerned a boundary wall and pillar, with a related civil suit pending, and …
The appellants Saurabh Verma and two others appealed to quash a summoning order issued by the Special Judge in a case alleging offences under the IPC and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They contended that the FIR was fabricated, filed after an unreasonable delay, and motivated by a …
The appellants were summoned under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC for allegedly assaulting the complainant and his son with lathi and iron rods and using caste‑related insults during a land‑possession dispute that is pending before a civil court. The appellants argued that the …
The appellants, Babloo Singh and two others, filed a criminal appeal challenging a complaint lodged against them under Sections 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act, along with several IPC offences. The complaint alleged that an incident occurred on 20‑07‑2023 inside the house of the …
The appellants challenged the prosecution's case, arguing that the FIR of 29‑09‑2023 specifically implicated only appellant No.1 for assault, while the other accused were mentioned vaguely without distinct allegations. They contended that proceeding against appellants No.2 and No.3 under the IPC and …
The appellant, Smt. Ruby, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to set aside a Special Judge’s order rejecting her application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS. The High Court noted that the same facts …
The appellants challenged a summoning order issued by the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, arguing that the FIR was filed with a one‑day delay, that no assault or caste‑based insult was proved, and that the trial court ignored medical evidence. The respondents contended …
Bhagwan Das filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court’s order granting Rs 3,000 per month maintenance and a Rs 5,00,000 one‑time compensation to his wife under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and the appellate court’s affirmation of the same. The revisionist …
Sindhu Saran appealed the Family Court's order granting his wife Rs 5,000 and his daughter Rs 3,000 per month as maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. He argued that he is a labourer with limited earnings and that the court’s finding of his income was vague and unsupported, making the total award of …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Gupta, filed a criminal revision (No. 5335 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, his counsel, Lal Chandra Mishra, informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the revision. The court, taking note of this statement, dismissed …
Sunehri Singh appealed to the Allahabad High Court against a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs 5,000 per month as maintenance for his two minor daughters under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He contended that the amount was excessive, asserting that his income from tuition work …
The wife filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 alleging physical, mental and economic abuse and sought interim maintenance under Section 23. The trial court granted modest interim maintenance, which was partially modified by the District & …
The revisionist, Nitin Bansal, appealed the Additional Principal Judge’s order under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. that required him to pay Rs 6,000 per month to his wife and Rs 4,000 to his minor daughter. He argued that he was unemployed, had lost his investment, and that the amount was excessive …
The husband, Mayank Saxena, appealed a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs.15,000 per month as maintenance to his wife, Sweta Saxena, under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. The parties mediated at the High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre and entered into a settlement agreement on …
Rahul filed a criminal revision challenging the Sessions Judge's order granting interim maintenance of Rs.4500 per month to the opposite party under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The trial court had based the interim award on a prima facie assessment of …
The husband, Mohit Kumar Wadhwa, filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging a Family Court order that directed him to pay Rs 20,000 per month to his wife and later Rs 25,000 per month. He contended that his actual earnings as a labourer in his father's …
The revisionist, a labourer, challenged the Family Court’s order directing him to pay Rs 4,000 per month to his wife and Rs 1,000 to a third party under Section 125 Cr.P.C., claiming the amount was excessive given his modest earnings. The State opposed, arguing the award was reasonable in light of …
The revisionist Naresh Verma challenged a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs 10,000 per month as maintenance to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He claimed his income was only Rs 10,000 per month from work in a jewellery shop that he does not own, arguing the amount …
The revisionist, a retired Indian Army pensioner earning Rs 31,000 per month, challenged the Family Court's order directing him to pay Rs 4,000‑5,000 monthly maintenance to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, claiming the amount was excessive and that she had withdrawn Rs 6 …
Ishan Sahu filed a criminal revision under Sections 397/401 CrPC challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs 12,000 per month (Rs 8,000 to his wife and Rs 4,000 to his son) passed by the Family Court under Section 125 CrPC. The petitioner argued that he runs only a small temporary bicycle repair …
The revisionist, Raj Kumar Maurya, appealed against a Family Court order under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code that required him to pay Rs 25,000 per month as maintenance for his minor son. He argued that his wife, who also earns a substantial salary, should share the maintenance burden …
Smt Humaira Riyaz filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that denied her maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. while granting it to her two minor sons. The dispute centered on whether her second marriage, entered into on 27‑05‑2012, was void because her first husband’s talaq, …
The revisionist Brijesh Prajapati filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code to set aside an order of the Family Court, Jaunpur, in a matrimonial dispute. The High Court examined the record and noted that the dispute was of a matrimonial nature, making it suitable for …
The petitioner, Pallavi Srivastava, filed a criminal revision under Sections 397/401 CrPC challenging the Family Court's order dated 16 September 2025 that dismissed her Section 125 CrPC maintenance application on jurisdictional grounds. She alleged that after leaving her matrimonial home in …
The husband filed a criminal revision challenging a maintenance order dated 10 September 2025 that required him to pay Rs. 6,000 per month to his former wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The parties had divorced in 2005, and in 2007 they entered into a settlement that led to a …
The revisionist, Ravindra Kumar Misra, filed an application under Section 126(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to recall an ex parte judgment and order dated 28 March 2016. The application was filed in compliance with a prior order dated 17 February 2026 in Criminal Revision No. 4951 of …
The High Court examined a criminal revision filed by Mukhtyar challenging a Family Court order that directed him to pay Rs.2,500 per month as maintenance to his former wife’s daughter, Muskan. The revisionist argued that Muskan had attained majority at the time of filing the maintenance application …
