Created by Fuzzy Cloud

MANISH KUMAR

37 judgments · newest first · showing 1–37

SURESH KUMAR MISHRAversusASHISH TIWARI SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT, ADARSH KARAGAAR LUCKNOW

Dismissed on merits/Rejected

Suresh Kumar Mishra filed a civil contempt application against Ashish Tiwari, Senior Superintendent, Adarsh Karagaar, Lucknow. The applicant’s counsel, Ashok Kumar and Chandra Prakash, were not present in court and no request for adjournment was made. The bench noted the absence of counsel and the …

RAJEEV SETHversusNARENDRA KUMAR SINGH, MANAGING DIRECTOR, U.P. LTD. LKO. AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The applicant, Rajeev Seth, filed a civil contempt application (No. 4333 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The matter was listed for hearing on the revised list. Neither the applicant’s counsel, Anilesh Tewari, nor any representative appeared, and no request for adjournment …

AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEYversusGIRISH KUMAR SINGH DIST. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS SULTANPUR

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The applicant, Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, filed a civil contempt application against Girish Kumar Singh, District Inspector of Schools, Sultanpur. The matter was listed as non‑adjournable and was called before the bench. The applicant’s counsel did not appear and no request for adjournment was made. …

SHRAVAN KUMAR SINGHversusANOOP KUMAR DISTT.INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS GONDA

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The petitioner, Shravan Kumar Singh, filed a civil contempt application against Anoop Kumar, District Inspector of Schools, Gonda. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but the petitioner's counsel, Saryu Prasad Tiwari, was absent and no request for adjournment was …

ALIM ABBASversusMR.DEEPAK KUMAR and 2 ORS.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Alim Abbas filed a contempt application against Mr. Deepak Kumar and two others. The matter was listed under the heading “These matters, be not adjourned”. Neither the counsel for the applicant nor the counsel for the opposite parties appeared before the court, and no request for adjournment was …

MOHD. ASIF AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND 2 OTHERS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Mohd. Asif and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The applicants' counsel, Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, was not present in court to press the application. No request for adjournment was made on behalf of …

RAM AUTARversusSRI NITISHWAR KUMAR PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BASIC and 2 ORS.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicant, Ram Autar, filed a civil contempt application (No. 1072 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Justice Manish Kumar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of …

JAMUNA PRASAD TIWARIversusJASJEET KAUR, DISTT. MAGISTRATE, SULTANPUR

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Jamuna Prasad Tiwari filed a civil contempt application (No. 1782 of 2023) against Jasjeet Kaur, the District Magistrate of Sultanpur. The applicant's counsel, comprising Shikha Srivastava, Richa Srivastava and Suneel Kumar Singh Kalhans, were listed but neither the applicant nor any counsel …

SHITLA PRASAD SHUKLAversusSHIVASHISH SHUKLA AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Shitla Prasad Shukla filed a civil contempt application against Shivashish Shukla and others. The applicant's counsel did not appear before the court and no request for adjournment was made on his behalf. The court noted the absence of representation and the lack of any request to postpone the …

U.P.S.R.T.C. FAIZABAD THROUGH ITS R.M.AND ORS.versusMOHD. NAFEES KHAN AND ORS.

Decided by Lok Adalat

The appellant, U.P.S.R.T.C. Faizabad, filed a first appeal against Order No. 421 of 2008. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel for the appellant appeared, and no request for adjournment was made. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal in default. The …

AJAY YADAVversusGHANSHYAM BHARTIYA, TAHSILDAR, TAHSIL JAISINGHPUR, SULTANPUR

Dismissed on merits/Rejected

Ajay Yadav filed a civil contempt application (No. 3011 of 2024) against Ghanshyam Bhartiya, the Tahsildar of Jaisinghpur, Sultanpur. The applicant was represented by counsel Rakesh Kumar Yadav. No appearance was made on behalf of the applicant before the court. The bench examined whether the …

ANAMIKA SHUKLAversusSRI ATUL KUMAR TEWARI BASIC SHIKSHA ADHIKARI GONDA

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, heard a contempt application filed by Anamika Shukla against Sri Atul Kumar Tewari Basic Shiksha Adhikari. The applicant's counsel was not present and no request for adjournment was made. Consequently, the court dismissed the contempt …

KRISHNA CHANDRAversusSRI CHINTA MANI DWIVEDI DIRECTOR NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Krishna Chandra filed a civil contempt application alleging that the District Magistrate and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) wilfully disobeyed an order dated 06-06-2016. The NHAI contended that the order itself directed that the District Magistrate was the appropriate authority to …

SMT. SONI DEVIversusDR. SURYA PRAKASH SINGH, DISTT. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS, UNNAO

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) heard a civil contempt application filed by Smt. Soni Devi against Dr. Surya Prakash Singh, District Inspector of Schools, Unnao. The applicant was represented by counsel Sanjay Kumar Singh, while no counsel appeared for the opposite party. …

ARUN KUMAR SINGH and ORS.versusSRI RAVINDRA KUMAR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UNNAO and ORS.

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The petitioners filed a civil contempt application (No. 1893 of 2020) against the District Magistrate, Unnao and others. At the hearing on 10 January 2024, no petitioner appeared, though the State’s standing counsel was present. The Court observed that the passage of time had rendered the contempt …

DEEP KUMAR BAJPAIversusRAKESH SHANKAR DY. I.G. POLICEESTB./PERSONNEL P.H.Q. ALLD.

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Deep Kumar Bajpai filed a civil contempt application against Deputy IG Rakesh Shankar. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State's standing counsel was present. The court observed that the passage of time had rendered the contempt petition infructuous. Consequently, the petition was …

PRAVEEN SHANKAR RAIversusSRI L. VENKATESHWAR LOO, PRIN. SECY. TRANSPORT DEPTT. LKO.

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The applicant, Praveen Shankar Rai, filed a civil contempt application against Sri L. Venkateshwar Loo, Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Lucknow. The matter was listed in the revised list, but the applicant's counsel, Sushil Kumar Pathak, was not present and no request for adjournment was …

JUGUL KISHOREversusSRI RAJ KUMAR PANDIT BASIC SHIKSHA ADHIKARI AMETHI DISTT. AM

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The applicant, Jugul Kishore, filed a civil contempt application (No. 627 of 2017) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to enforce a notice that matters listed as 'These matters shall not be adjourned' must be decided in the first round without revision. The court had posted a notice outside the …

DINESH KUMAR GUPTAversusSRI NITIN RAMESH GOKARN SECY.INROMATION and PUBLIC RELATIONS

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The applicant, Dinesh Kumar Gupta, filed a civil contempt application (No. 375 of 2007) against Sri Nitin Ramesh Gokarn, Secretary, Information and Public Relations. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, although the Assistant Chief Secretary (ACSC) was present. The court noted the lack of …

HEMANT BAHADUR SINGHversusSURAJ PRATAP TEHSILDAR TEHSIL AMETHI DISTT. AMETHI

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Hemant Bahadur Singh filed a civil contempt application against Suraj Pratap, a Tehsildar of Amethi. The applicant's counsel, Ambika Prasad Mishra, was absent from the hearing and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the applicant's failure to prosecute the application. Consequently, …

RAM ABHILAKHversusSRI MANOJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, S.D.M., TAHSIL-SOHAWAL, AYODHYA

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Ram Abhilakh filed a contempt application alleging that the order dated 27 July 2023 had not been complied with by Sri Manoj Kumar Srivastava, the Sub Divisional Magistrate. The State's standing counsel submitted that the order had been fully complied with and placed the compliance instructions on …

PRAMOD KUMAR TIWARIversusSRI AJAYCHAUHAN PRIN. SECY. LOK NIRMAN VIBHAG LKO.

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The applicant, Pramod Kumar Tiwari, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Justice Manish Kumar. Neither of the applicant's counsels, Anand Mani Tripathi and Anurag Tripathi, appeared in court, and no request for adjournment was made …