Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
93 judgments · newest first · showing 1–93
A large number of writ petitions were filed by heirs of landowners alleging that their applications under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed in 1993, had remained pending for 33 years without any order. The petitioners sought directions for disposal of these applications. The Court …
Vimal Subhash Sathe filed a writ petition seeking deletion of reservation entries in the 7/12 revenue extract for his land at Gat No.30, Village Nere, Pune, which were recorded for the Kasarsai Ujawa Kalwa irrigation project. The petitioner argued that the land was never actually acquired, citing a …
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking redress for applications filed under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in 1993 that had remained pending for 33 years. The Court observed that the delay was unacceptable and that the Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, Metro Centre No.3, …
A large number of writ petitions were filed by heirs of landowners alleging that their applications under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed in 1993, had remained pending for 33 years without any order. The petitioners sought directions for disposal of these applications. The Court …
A large number of writ petitions were filed by heirs of landowners alleging that their applications under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed in 1993, had remained pending for 33 years without any order. The petitioners sought directions for disposal of these applications. The Court …
A large number of writ petitions were filed by heirs of landowners alleging that their applications under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed in 1993, had remained pending for 33 years without any order. The petitioners sought directions for disposal of these applications. The Court …
A large number of writ petitions were filed by heirs of landowners alleging that their applications under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed in 1993, had remained pending for 33 years without any order. The petitioners sought directions for disposal of these applications. The Court …
A large number of writ petitions were filed by heirs of landowners alleging that their applications under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed in 1993, had remained pending for 33 years without any order. The petitioners sought directions for disposal of these applications. The Court …
A large number of writ petitions were filed by heirs of landowners alleging that their applications under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed in 1993, had remained pending for 33 years without any order. The petitioners sought directions for disposal of these applications. The Court …
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd, a secured creditor, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking the Court's permission to withdraw the petition because the concerned magistrate had already disposed of its application under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial …
SMFG India Home Finance Co. Ltd., a secured creditor, filed two applications under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alibag, on 25 February 2025 and 20 June 2025. The magistrate …
The petitioner claimed that the State, through the Public Works Department, took possession of his land in 2010 for a road‑widening project and, despite issuing notices in 2011 and 2013, failed to pay any compensation. He invoked Article 300A of the Constitution and sought acquisition, computation …
The Cosmos Co‑op Bank filed a writ petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act seeking the magistrate’s assistance to take possession of movable secured assets (industrial shed and machinery). The magistrate had rejected the application, holding that Rules 4 and 5 provide a complete mechanism for …
Balaji Namdeo Shivhagat and another filed Writ Petition No. 5232 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court. The petitioners failed to appear before the Court on four separate occasions (23 April, 16 June, 7 July and 27 July 2026). The Court observed that such repeated non‑appearance indicated a lack of …
The petitioners, owners of land acquired for the Kukadi Dam Project, obtained a land acquisition award on 31 May 1999 but have not received any compensation despite possession being taken. They contend that, under the proviso to Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in …
The petitioners, Limra Garment House and another, filed a writ petition seeking urgent relief to prevent the Bank of Baroda, a secured creditor, from taking physical possession of a property on 27 July 2026. They argued that the possession would render their securitisation application (Diary No.1170 …
The petitioner, Shagufta Tarique Khan, sought relief from a notice dated 30 March 2026 issued by the Assistant Registrar of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) that prescribed a strict procedure for urgent matters, claiming it was arbitrary and left no scope for her to obtain an interim order before …
Anil Rahi filed a writ petition challenging a First Labour Court order that allowed the employer to raise certain preliminary issues after the issues had already been recast on 04.03.2022. The petitioner argued that the Labour Court erred because the recast issues already covered jurisdiction and …
The petitioner, Motilal Oswal Home Finance Limited, a secured creditor, filed a writ petition seeking relief concerning a secured asset. The trial court had earlier issued an order on 14 July 2026 directing the petitioner to take possession of the asset. The petitioner’s counsel informed the High …
The petitioner, Motilal Oswal Home Finance Limited, a secured creditor, filed a writ petition seeking relief concerning a secured asset. The trial court had issued an order on 16 July 2026 directing the petitioner to take possession of the asset. The petitioner’s counsel informed the High Court that …
Ugro Capital Ltd., a secured creditor, filed two writ petitions seeking a limited direction to the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mumbai, to dispose of its applications filed under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 …
The Gram Panchayat of Nere challenged two orders dated 13 June 2025 by the Pune District Collector that allotted 4.24 hectares and 3.04 hectares of Gairan land to the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) for the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana‑2.0 scheme. The petitioners argued that …
The applicant, the legal heir of the deceased Bhimabai Baburao Kadam, filed an interim application seeking restoration of a writ petition that had been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 20 April 2026. The Court examined the reasons set out in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the application and was persuaded …
Axis Bank Limited, a secured creditor, filed a writ petition seeking limited protection for the speedy disposal of its application under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, which had been pending before a …
The petitioner, Phoenix ARC Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction for the actual issuance of a recovery certificate that the Debts Recovery Tribunal‑I, Mumbai (DRT) had ordered on 12 January 2024. Despite the DRT's order directing issuance of a certificate …
The petitioners, Krishna Autocomp and others, filed a writ petition seeking a limited direction to the Debt Recovery Tribunal-II, Mumbai, to consider pending interim applications and a securitisation application concerning a secured asset whose physical possession was scheduled for 28 July 2026. The …
The petitioner, Prakash Janardan Mhatre, filed an interim application seeking to amend his writ petition (No. 4632 of 2023) by adding averments based on documents already filed, notably the land acquisition award. The Court examined the proposed amendment schedule and noted that the new averments …
ASREC (India) Ltd filed writ petition No. 7560 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The Court, on 23 June 2026, issued directions requiring the respondents to submit certain documents. The parties complied, and the learned Additional …
Petitioner Naveen Anant Gawali challenged an order dated 29 May 2026 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer under Section 19C(3) of the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955, which rejected his objection to the disbursal of compensation and directed that the amount be paid to private respondents. The High …
Petitioners Dattatreya Balwant Padwal and others filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. Their counsel, Mr. Nilesh Wable, applied for permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the application, allowed the withdrawal and …
The petitioners filed writ petitions fearing demolition of their structures due to a road‑widening project by Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation. The corporation filed undertakings, both electronically and on affidavit, promising that no demolition would be carried out without giving the …
The petitioners filed writ petitions fearing demolition of their structures due to a road‑widening project by Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation. The corporation filed undertakings, both electronically and on affidavit, promising that no demolition would be carried out without giving the …
The petitioners sought restoration of their writ petition, which had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections, by filing Interim Application No. 4449 of 2026. They argued that a parallel Interim Application No. 4453 of 2026 was already pending and that the court should consider the …
The petitioner, Mahadev Hira Koli, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay seeking relief. The petitioner later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the writ petition and instead pursue his grievance in a civil court. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. …
The petitioners sought to amend their writ petition after a land acquisition award was passed on 1 June 2026, adding new grounds of challenge and prayer clauses. They argued that the amendment was necessary to address the potential demolition of a temple on the disputed property, claiming urgency. …
The petitioners, a trust, sought relief in a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The State, as respondent No.6, filed a reply affidavit stating that, in light of the Court’s order dated 21‑04‑2017 and the Supreme Court’s decision in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal (S.L.P. (C) …
The petitioner challenged the Municipal Corporation's attempt to force acceptance of TDR/FSI as compensation for land acquired for road widening and to demolish alleged unauthorised construction. The High Court had earlier ordered the corporation not to take coercive action. Despite that, the …
The petitioners challenged the acquisition of land for the widening of a National Highway. They later submitted a letter offering a settlement to the Collector, which the Collector accepted, proposing to dispose of the writ petition on those terms. Both parties filed affidavits confirming the …
The petitioner, Narmada Estates Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner later instructed its counsel, Mr. Rohan P. Surve, to withdraw the petition, stating it had become infructuous. The written instruction was tendered and marked for identification. The Court …
The petitioner, the sole bidder in an auction conducted by UCO Bank, sought an extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration and the refund of his Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) after the bank unilaterally cancelled the auction. The bank contended that a moratorium under Section 95 of the …
Au Small Finance Bank Ltd, as a secured creditor, filed a writ petition seeking the High Court to direct the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mumbai, to decide a pending application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act within 30 days, as mandated by a prior judgment in L & T Finance Ltd. v. State of …
The Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) had stayed further proceedings in a debt recovery case because a moratorium under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) was in force due to a pending petition before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The petitioners – a secured creditor and …
IIFL Home Finance Limited filed a writ petition (No. 3703 of 2026) in the High Court of Bombay challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The Court had earlier issued directions on 9 April 2026, which the petitioner was required to comply with. On 28 April 2026, counsel …
The petitioners, owners of shops and galas, alleged that their premises were demolished for a road‑widening project by the Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation and that they had not received any compensation. They filed multiple writ petitions seeking redress and had earlier submitted …
Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd. filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking relief regarding a secured asset. The petitioner claimed that the directions issued by the court on 2 April 2026 had been complied with and that physical possession of the asset had been handed over. The …
IIFL Home Finance Ltd. filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking further directions after earlier orders dated 16 March 2026. The petitioner claimed that it had complied with those orders and had taken physical possession of the secured assets. The respondents, the State of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Competent Authority and Sub‑Divisional Officer, Bhiwandi. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel submitted a praecipe on 6 April 2026 indicating the petitioner's desire to withdraw the petition. The court …
Icici Home Finance Company Ltd. and another secured creditors filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra, the District Magistrate of Pune and others. The petition sought relief and was allowed by the Court in an order dated 08/04/2026. The petitioners later …
The petitioners in Writ Petition No. 6819 of 2016 sought to withdraw their petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner's counsel was absent, and the respondent's counsel asserted that the petitioners themselves were present and wished to withdraw. The court gave the petitioner's counsel an …
The writ petitions filed by Hanumant Ranganath Phadtare and Ranjana Mahadev Kumbhar challenge the actions of the Competent Authority for Land Acquisition. The petitions were listed before a two‑judge bench of the Bombay High Court. No substantive facts, arguments or evidence are recorded in the …
The petitioners sought the return of 25.39 acres of land acquired in 1970 for a new township, alleging that the land was being leased to private parties contrary to the public purpose and invoking the Supreme Court's decision in Royal Orchid Hotels Ltd. v. G. Jayarama Reddy. They also amended the …
Axis Bank Limited, a secured creditor, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court concerning a grievance arising in the Ahmednagar district. The court observed that the appropriate forum for the petition was the Aurangabad Bench of the same High Court. On the bank's instructions, the petitioner …
The petitioners, who are auction purchasers, challenged a May 14, 2025 order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) that, while deciding an application for waiver of a pre‑deposit under Section 18 of the Securitisation Act, also imposed a blanket interim direction restraining them from …
Petitioners Barsuram Dharma Kadake and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and CIDCO. The petition was represented by Ms. Deepa Punde on behalf of Mr. Sachin Punde. The State was represented by Mr. A. I. Patel and Ms. P. M. J. …
The petitioner, Prakash Padurang Bhoir, filed a writ petition challenging a 2020 order under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act that allowed the bank to take possession of a secured asset. The bank, invoking Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, auctioned the property after the original borrower …
The petitioners, Chandrabhan Laxman Khalkar and others, had their writ petition dismissed because they failed to remove office objections, as ordered on 03/10/2025. They filed an interim application seeking restoration of the dismissed petition. The High Court examined whether the dismissal could be …
The Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO) applied for a six‑month extension to complete land acquisition and pass an award for lands belonging to the petitioners, as directed by the High Court on 30‑04‑2025. The court noted that the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) had delayed …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kedarram Rajbhar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against The Akola Urban Co Operative Bank Ltd and others. The petitioner later requested permission to withdraw the petition to pursue other legal remedies. The Court considered the request …
The petitioner, Vijaykumar Hariprasad Agarwal, claimed that the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) failed to pay statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s …
Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the District Magistrate of Daman to decide a pending application (No.15 of 2022) filed under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, …
The petitioner, Hirabai Pandurang Mokal, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner died on 9 November 2025. An interim application was filed by the petitioner’s sole legal heir seeking substitution as the petitioner to …
Petitioner Pankaj R. Verma filed a writ petition challenging a statutory notice issued by ICICI Bank under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, alleging it and the subsequent possession notice were illegal. The …
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 16519, 16518, 16407, 16405, 16523, 16883, 1139 of 2025/2026) against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitions were listed before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Manish Pitale and Hon'ble Justice Shreeram …
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 16519, 16518, 16407, 16405, 16523, 16883, 1139 of 2025/2026) against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitions were listed before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Manish Pitale and Hon'ble Justice Shreeram …
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 16519, 16518, 16407, 16405, 16523, 16883, 1139 of 2025/2026) against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitions were listed before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Manish Pitale and Hon'ble Justice Shreeram …
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 16519, 16518, 16407, 16405, 16523, 16883, 1139 of 2025/2026) against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitions were listed before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Manish Pitale and Hon'ble Justice Shreeram …
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd., through its legal manager, filed multiple writ petitions in the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners later sought the court's permission to withdraw all the pending writ petitions. The court considered whether it could entertain the …
The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly killing his wife with an axe and was sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal, the appellant argued that there was no direct eye‑witness, that key panch witnesses had turned hostile, and that his alibi defence was not …
The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly killing his wife with an axe and was sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution relied on testimony of the appellant's father, other family members, a doctor’s post‑mortem report, forensic blood‑group analysis linking the …
The petitioner, Shripad B. Dabri, filed a writ petition that was disposed of on 25 June 2025, directing the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Pune to decide a pending securitization application within six months of a Rs.25,00,000 deposit. The DRT hearing remains ongoing, and both parties jointly …
A large group of petitioners filed multiple writ petitions (Nos. 8509, 8513, 8518, etc.) against the Union of India, the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other respondents, alleging non‑payment of statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, …
A large group of writ petitions (Nos. 8509, 8513, 8514, etc.) were filed by land owners against the Union of India, the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other authorities alleging non‑payment of statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. …
A large group of writ petitions (Nos. 8509, 8513, 8518, etc.) were filed by various landowners against the Union of India, the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other respondents alleging non‑payment of statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition …
A large group of writ petitions (Nos. 8509, 8513, 8518, etc.) were filed by various landowners against the Union of India, the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other respondents alleging non‑payment of statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition …
A large group of writ petitions (Nos. 8509, 8513, 8518, etc.) were filed by various landowners against the Union of India, the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other respondents alleging non‑payment of statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition …
A large group of writ petitions (Nos. 8509, 8513, 8518, etc.) were filed by various landowners against the Union of India, the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other respondents alleging non‑payment of statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition …
A large group of writ petitions (Nos. 8509, 8513, 8518, etc.) were filed by various landowners against the Union of India, the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other respondents alleging non‑payment of statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition …
A large group of writ petitions (Nos. 8509, 8513, 8518, etc.) were filed by various landowners against the Union of India, the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other respondents alleging non‑payment of statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition …
A large group of writ petitions (Nos. 8509, 8513, 8518, etc.) were filed by various landowners against the Union of India, the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other respondents alleging non‑payment of statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition …
A large group of writ petitions (Nos. 8509, 8513, 8518, etc.) were filed by various landowners against the Union of India, the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other respondents alleging non‑payment of statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition …
A large group of writ petitions (Nos. 8509, 8513, 8518, etc.) were filed by various landowners against the Union of India, the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other respondents alleging non‑payment of statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition …
A large group of writ petitions (Nos. 8509, 8513, 8518, etc.) were filed by various landowners against the Union of India, the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other respondents alleging non‑payment of statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition …
A large group of writ petitions filed by various land owners alleged that the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other state authorities failed to pay statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners relied on the Supreme Court’s …
A large group of writ petitions filed by various land owners alleged that the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other state authorities failed to pay statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners relied on the Supreme Court’s …
A large group of writ petitions filed by various land owners alleged that the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other state authorities failed to pay statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners relied on the Supreme Court’s …
A large group of writ petitions filed by various land owners alleged that the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other state authorities failed to pay statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners relied on the Supreme Court’s …
A large group of writ petitions filed by various land owners alleged that the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other state authorities failed to pay statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners relied on the Supreme Court’s …
A large group of petitioners filed separate writ petitions (Nos. 8509, 8510, 8512, etc.) against the Union of India, the Ministry of Shipping, and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) alleging non‑payment of statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition …
A large group of writ petitions filed by various land owners alleged that the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other state authorities failed to pay statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners relied on the Supreme Court’s …
A large group of writ petitions filed by various land owners alleged that the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other state authorities failed to pay statutory solatium and interest under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners relied on the Supreme Court’s …
The petitioner, a defaulting borrower, filed a One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal after a Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) order required a 10% payment to consider the OTS. The bank rejected the OTS and issued a possession notice. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the bank to …
The appellants in three related criminal appeals filed several interim applications seeking procedural relief, including the addition of the passport authority as a party, permission to withdraw an application, and permission to travel for personal reasons. The Court examined whether the passport …
The petitioner, Atmaram Sudam Bhagat, filed writ petition No. 9408 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and CIDCO. The petition was pending before a bench of Justices Manish Pitale and Shreeram V. Shirsat. On the day of hearing, counsel for the …
