Created by Fuzzy Cloud

MANJIVE SHUKLA

17 judgments · newest first · showing 1–17

STATE OF U.P. THROUGH MAGISTRATE AND 3 OTHERSversusYASIN

The State of Uttar Pradesh filed an application seeking condonation of delay in filing a review petition against a 2014 judgment in Yasin v. State of U.P. The Special Leave Petition (Civil) against that judgment was dismissed on 26 November 2019, but the review petition was only filed on 25 March …

SITARAM RASTOGIversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sitaram Rastogi, filed Writ‑C No. 11375 of 2024 challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The matter was heard before Hon’ble Justice Manjive Shukla of the Allahabad High Court. The court referred to an earlier order dated 20 April 2026 in …

SITARAM RASTOGI AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 6 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court dealt with two writ petitions concerning the Shri Harihar Sanskrit Pathshala Society, which is governed by the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The Assistant Registrar had earlier, on 2 December 2023, finalized a list of eleven general‑body members and rejected the claim of …

RAJ KUMAR SHASHTRIversusD.I.O.S.FAIZABAD AND ANORS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Petitioner Raj Kumar Shashtri filed a writ petition in 2006 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel appeared on his behalf, though the Standing Counsel for the court was present. The petition remained pending for many years and the petitioner appeared to have lost interest in …

SURJAN KUMAR MAURYA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Surjan Kumar Maurya and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. The matter was listed for hearing, but the applicants failed to appear while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court noted the …

AKHILESH GUPTAversusTHE STATE OF U.P AND ANR .

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicant, Akhilesh Gupta, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash proceedings. The application was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but the applicant failed to appear. The court observed that, due to the passage of time, the …

ANOOP SRIVASTAVAversusTHE STATE OF U.P AND ANR.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Anoop Srivastava filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023) seeking the High Court's intervention in the criminal proceedings. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while the learned Additional …

RAGHVENDRA PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY SECYNDARY EDUATION

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Petitioner Raghvendra Pandey filed writ petition No. 1689 of 2005 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court noted that the list of cases was being revised and, due to the absence of the petitioner’s …

LIYAKAT ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT., LUCKNOW AND 5 OTHERS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petitioner, Liyakat Ali, filed a writ petition challenging the closure of his meat shop, alleging that the local police were not interfering with the business despite community protests. The respondents informed the Court that the shop's licence had expired on 15 October 2024 and no renewal had …

KRISHNA KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P.THRU SECY.SECONDARY EDUCATION AND 4 ORS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Krishna Kumar Pandey filed a writ petition (No. 4999 of 2005) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Secretary of Secondary Education and four other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing but no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the …