Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
282 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition as infructuous. No substantive merits of the case were …
The petitioners, a group of 23 candidates, filed a writ petition seeking to avail the benefit of a Supreme Court judgment (State of Uttar Pradesh v. Neeraj Kumar Pandey, SLP (C) No.18516 of 2019) that directed the state to consider candidates who scored higher than the lowest appointed assistant …
The petitioner, Mohammad Salamat, filed Writ‑A No. 14567 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court examined this submission and found that there was no longer any cause of action to be …
The petitioners, a group of candidates for Assistant Teacher (Science and Mathematics) posts, sought to invoke a Supreme Court judgment (State of Uttar Pradesh v. Neeraj Kumar Pandey, SLP (C) No.18516 of 2019) that directed the state to consider candidates who scored higher than the appointed …
Petitioner Birender Kumar filed a writ petition seeking to avail the benefit of a recent Supreme Court judgment (State of Uttar Pradesh v. Neeraj Kumar Pandey, 2025) concerning the recruitment of Assistant Teachers, which directed the state to consider candidates who scored higher than the appointed …
The petitioners, a group of 21 candidates, sought to avail the benefit of a Supreme Court judgment (State of Uttar Pradesh v. Neeraj Kumar Pandey, SLP (C) No.18516 of 2019) which directed the state to consider all candidates who scored higher than the lowest‑scoring appointed assistant teacher, …
The petitioner, appointed as an Assistant Teacher in 1973 by the school’s Management and approved by the education officer in 1974, was later excluded from salary payments after the school came under the grant‑in‑aid scheme in 1991. The exclusion was based on the claim that she lacked the …
The petitioner, Priyanka, filed a writ petition seeking appointment as Head Master of a privately managed aided junior high school, relying on a provisional selection list dated 24‑12‑2025 and her participation in document verification. The State authorities later omitted her name from the final …
The petitioner, Aman Mahajan, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his application for a compassionate appointment by the District Basic Education Officer, Aligarh. The rejection was based on the claim that his mother, Anita Gupta, was already in government service, a claim the …
Smt. Anita Gupta filed a writ petition challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The respondents contended that a statutory remedy exists under Rule‑5 of the U.P. Basic Education Staff Rules, 1973, allowing an appeal to the Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board, Prayagraj. The …
The petitioners challenged a Government Order dated 2 September 2026 and a related memorandum that authorised a Special Teacher Eligibility Test (Special TET) for in‑service teachers in Uttar Pradesh. They alleged that the order was ultra vires, diluted the standards prescribed by the National …
The petitioners filed a writ seeking to quash an order dated 2 September 2026 and a subsequent notification dated 3 September 2026 issued by the Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission, which barred Shiksha Mitras from applying for the Special Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) examination. …
The petitioners, including Madhubala and 182 others, sought to quash an order dated 2 September 2026 and a subsequent notification dated 3 September 2026 issued by the Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission that barred Shiksha Mitras from applying for the Special Teacher Eligibility …
Sixteen petitioners, appointed on compassionate grounds in the Uttar Pradesh education service, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to recognize their substantive appointment date as 10 March 2005 and to award the corresponding pay scale and arrears, instead of the …
The petitioners, 221 Shiksha Mitras employed in primary schools of Uttar Pradesh, challenged a Government Order and notification dated September 2026 that instituted a Special Teacher Eligibility Test (Special TET) for in‑service teachers but expressly excluded them. They alleged that the exclusion …
The petitioner, a former Assistant Teacher, retired on 31 March 2022 and alleges that salary arrears for the period 1 January 2022 to 31 March 2022 remain unpaid. She filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer (respondent No.2) to release the arrears and …
Ramkant Saxena filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an order dated 23 June 2025 passed by the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board. The respondent, the Board, argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Rule 5 of the Uttar Pradesh Basic …
Smt Rana Begam filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 08‑09‑2026 by respondent No. 6 that rejected her claim for pension. The petition argued that the order was illegal. The Court observed that the District Basic Education Officer, who passed the order, does not have jurisdiction to …
The petitioners, a group of 76 government employees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to grant them the first salary increment effective 1 January 2017, subsequent annual increments, and the payment of arrears with interest, relying on the CCS Revised Pay Rules, …
The petitioner, Neetu Singh, was appointed as a Shiksha Mitra but alleges that her honorarium, payable from 23 March 2026, has not been released despite a representation to the District Basic Education Officer, Farrukhabad. She filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the officer to pay …
Mukund Tomar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Secretary, Basic Education Board, U.P., to consider his candidature for district allotment based on his quality point marks and his position (Serial No. 512) in the published select list. The petitioner argued that his application was …
The petitioners, three government employees, filed a writ petition seeking a directive for the State of Uttar Pradesh to pay their salaries and arrears as per Government Orders dated June and December 2014, and also to compel the District Basic Education Officer to decide a representation filed on …
The petitioners, 38 teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay them salary and arrears pursuant to a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They alleged that the order entitled them to such remuneration and that the respondents had …
The petitioner, Brijesh Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a timely decision on his representation for a disability pension. The respondent, the State of U.P. and the Basic Education Officer, argued that a fresh representation could be filed and decided according to law. The Court, without delving …
The petitioner, Jagdish Prasad Sharma, filed Writ Petition No. 9859 of 2018 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The Court noted that the case fell …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 8602 of 2022) in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The petition remained pending since 2022 and the petitioners failed to appear for hearing despite notices and a directive to mark the cause of …
The petitioner, Prem Chand Pankaj, filed Writ A No. 9550 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition was listed for hearing but the petitioner’s counsel did not appear, and no indication was made that the cause of action still survived. …
The petition Hira Lal v. State of U.P. & Others was filed in the Allahabad High Court in 2019 seeking relief through a writ petition. The matter was listed for hearing but the petitioner’s counsel did not appear before the court. The case was placed in the category of writs likely to have become …
The petitioner, Hira Lal, filed Writ‑A No. 11288 of 2020 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The matter was listed for hearing but the petitioner’s counsel did not appear, nor was the case marked to show that the cause of action still survived. The …
The petitioners, nine Class‑IV employees, filed a writ petition seeking regularisation of their appointments, payment of back wages, increments and other service benefits from the date of their initial joining. They relied on two earlier Allahabad High Court judgments—Charan Singh (2024) and Pradeep …
The petitioner, a widow with M.A., B.P.Ed., B.Ed., M.P.Ed. and CCC qualifications, sought a compassionate appointment as an Assistant Teacher after her husband, an Assistant Teacher, died in service. She was instead offered a Class‑IV (Peon) post and filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing …
The petitioners, 37 in‑charge headmasters, filed a writ petition seeking payment of current salary and arrears pursuant to a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They alleged that despite multiple representations to the competent authority, no decision had been taken. The respondents argued that the …
The petitioner, Preeti Sharma, a former part‑time instructor at a primary school, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer to renew her appointment and decide on representations she had submitted. She alleged that her services were not renewed after the …
The petitioners, 81 teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters in Uttar Pradesh, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order dated 18‑12‑2025 issued by the District Basic Education Officer, Chitrakoot, and mandamus directing payment of their salaries and arrears under a Government Order dated …
Meena Devi filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 05.08.2026 of the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Farrukhabad, which rejected her representation for payment of interest on death gratuity without providing reasons. The petitioner’s husband, an Assistant Teacher, died in harness on …
The petitioner, Sandhya Tiwari, filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the District Basic Education Officer fix her salary as Headmistress of a school in Azamgarh from her date of joining on 01‑07‑2013 and pay arrears with interest. She alleged that despite a Government Order dated …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the respondents to pay House Rent Allowance (HRA) in accordance with a prior Full Bench judgment (Uma Shankar Singh v. State of U.P.) and to decide a representation dated 11‑12‑2025. The petitioners claimed they had approached the …
The petitioner, a government assistant teacher, was suspended and jailed on 3 September 2019 after an FIR was lodged under Sections 498‑A, 304‑B, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act following his wife's suicide. He was reinstated on 24 November 2022 on the condition that salary for the suspension …
The petitioners, Shakila and another, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court and subsequently prayed that the petition not be pressed, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The court considered the request and ordered that the petition be withdrawn, allowing the petitioners to file a …
The petitioners, 26 teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters/Headmistresses, filed a writ petition seeking direction for the State to pay them the appropriate scale and arrears of salary under a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They claimed to have made several representations to the competent …
The petitioner, Jai Shree Ram Saurabh Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition in order to file an intervention application in a related Special Appeal (No. 398 of 2026). The court …
Petitioner Sushma Devi, an Assistant Teacher in Pilibhit, filed a writ petition challenging a September 13, 2026 order that rejected her application for maternity leave for the period 18 September 2026 to 16 March 2027. She argued that she is entitled to the leave under established jurisprudence, …
The petitioners, including Annpoorana Rai, sought to have a District Basic Education Officer's order quashed and to be considered for appointment as Assistant Teachers in a Junior Basic School, relying on their BTC training certificate as a valid qualification. The respondents, the State of Uttar …
The petition under Article 227 was filed in 2017 by Mauji Lal against Rakesh Chandra. No counsel for the petitioner appeared at the hearing and the case was not marked to indicate that the cause of action still survived. The court noted a notice requiring old cases to be taken up promptly and warned …
The petition filed by Atul Nigam against the State of U.P. and others was listed as an old pending case for priority hearing. The court issued a notice that any case not marked as surviving or without counsel appearance would be dismissed as infructuous. Neither the petitioner's counsel appeared nor …
The petitioner, Sapana Varshney, filed a writ petition seeking appointment as an Assistant Teacher (Maths) in a senior basic school in Aligarh district, based on a Government Order dated 11 July 2013 for 29,334 teacher posts. The High Court noted that the matter had been decided by the Supreme Court …
The petitioner, Dinanath Verma, sought payment of honorarium arrears for his tenure as Shiksha Mitra in a primary school from November 2007 to August 2012, claiming he was appointed by a district magistrate’s order after a prior writ. He argued that despite a stay on his appointment in 2007, he …
Jayjeet Maurya filed a writ petition seeking to quash the orders of the District Basic Education Officer, Shahjahanpur, which denied his appointment as an Assistant Teacher on the ground that his BTC training certificate was not a valid qualification. He requested that the respondents consider him …
The petition (Writ‑A No. 17324 of 2021) was filed by Radheshyam Mishra against the State of U.P. and others. The case had been listed as an old pending matter and a specific notice required parties to appear or mark the cause of action as surviving, failing which the matter would be dismissed as …
The petitioners, Jai Prakash Singh and 14 others, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 10 June 2016 of the District Basic Education Officer, Shahjahanpur, and to obtain appointment as Assistant Teachers in Junior Basic Schools, contending that their BTC training certificates should …
The petitioners, a grant‑in‑aid junior high school, sought to fill three vacant Assistant Teacher posts that had become vacant through superannuation. The State, relying on a Government Order dated 25‑01‑2019 and a student‑teacher ratio of 35:1 under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory …
The petitioners, eight assistant teachers, challenged two orders dated 29 July 2025 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Uttar Pradesh, which allegedly removed them from service and affected their salary. They sought a writ restraining interference with their …
The petitioners, five Assistant Teachers, challenged two orders dated 29 July 2025 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Uttar Pradesh, which alleged fraud in their appointments and affected their salaries. The Court noted that no counter‑affidavit was filed by the …
The petitioner, Mohd Parvez Alam Warsi, who had been employed as an Instructor of Art/Physical & Health Education in a primary school from 2013 to 2023‑24, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to renew his engagement for the 2024‑25 and 2025‑26 sessions and to pay the …
The petitioner, Tej Kumari, a former part‑time instructor at a primary school, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer to renew her appointment and to decide a representation dated 01‑08‑2026. She alleged that her services were not renewed after the …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State authorities to decide his application for a compassionate appointment after his father, an Assistant Teacher who died in harness, left the family dependent. He had submitted a representation on 17 July 2017 …
The petitioner Arvind filed a writ petition seeking permission to appear for counseling for the Assistant Teacher recruitment and to have his actual date of birth corrected in the application form, alleging that the date of birth was wrongly entered. He claimed that his earlier writ petition (Writ‑A …
The petitioners, eight assistant teachers, challenged orders dated 29 July 2025 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, which adversely affected their appointments and salary. They sought a writ restraining interference with their peaceful functioning and direction …
The petitioners, three assistant teachers, challenged two orders dated 29‑07‑2025 that removed them from service and halted their salary. They argued that the orders were based on an alleged fraud finding that conflicted with earlier departmental inquiries and approvals. The court noted that the …
The petitioner, Smt. Anupriya Rai, an Assistant Teacher, challenged two orders dated 29 July 2025 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Uttar Pradesh, which alleged irregularities in her appointment and sought to withhold her salary. The petition argued that the …
The petitioner, Hem Late, a school instructor appointed in 2013, sought a writ directing the Block Education Officer to allow her to join as Instructor and to compel the District Magistrate to renew her contract and pay honorarium for June-July 2025. She claimed her services were regularly renewed …
The petitioner, Sharad Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer to issue his experience certificate, appointment letter, and salary as Headmaster. The petitioner claimed to have worked as an Assistant Teacher from September 2010 to June 2011 …
Thirty petitioners, including Hitesh Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of a Finance Controller communication and a Director of Education order, and demanding that their salaries be re‑fixed with the first increment as of 01‑01‑2017, along with regular monthly payment and arrears with …
The petitioner, Kapil Kumar, a Part Time Instructor of Health and Physical Education since 2013, sought a writ directing the respondents to renew his contract and allow him to resume duties after his services were not renewed beyond the 2022-2023 session without notice or hearing. He also requested …
The petitioner, Vinay Verma, had been engaged as a Part‑Time Instructor (Computer Education) at a composite school in Pilibhit since 2013, with his contract last renewed for the 2023‑2024 session. After that session he was not permitted to continue, without any notice or hearing, and he filed a writ …
The petitioner, a part‑time instructor since 2013, was unable to attend duty after an accident on 19‑Oct‑2024 and received a show‑cause notice on 26‑Dec‑2024. He replied on 8‑Jan‑2025 but no decision was taken on his request for renewal of contract and payment of honorarium. The petitioner filed a …
The petitioners, Smt. Sakshi Singh and 12 others, filed a writ petition challenging a transfer order, arguing that the order was issued pursuant to a Division Bench decision in Special Appeal No. 398 of 2026. They sought to stay or withdraw the writ petition because they intended to intervene in the …
The petitioners, Sunita Gautam and 12 others, filed a writ petition challenging a transfer order. They contended that the order was issued pursuant to a Division Bench order in Special Appeal No. 398 of 2026 (Saurabh Kumar Singh v. State of U.P.). The petitioners sought a stay on the writ …
The petitioner, Alka Rao, challenged a transfer order issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petitioner argued that the order was already being contested in Special Appeal No. 398 of 2026 (Saurabh Kumar Singh & 6 Others vs. State of U.P. & 5 Others) and therefore the …
The petitioner, Shanti Devi, who is serving as In‑charge Headmaster, filed a writ petition seeking direction for the payment of her salary and arrears pursuant to a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026, and also asked the court to compel the respondents to decide a representation dated 08‑09‑2026 …
The petitioners, a group of 44 government employees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to grant them the first salary increment on 1 January 2017, subsequent annual increments, and payment of arrears with interest, relying on the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, …
The petitioner, Nivedika Tiwari, a former Instructor in a primary school (2013-2022), filed a writ petition seeking direction to be appointed as Instructor in an Upper Primary School and for the respondent to decide her pending renewal representation. She had left the post for medical reasons and a …
The petitioner, Arundhati Devi, wife of the deceased employee Sarvesh Kumar Dwivedi, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of her claim for family pension and death gratuity. The respondents rejected her claim on the ground that the deceased had nominated his mother for all retiral …
The petitioners, 36 contractual watchmen, cooks and peons employed in Kasturba Gandhi Residential Girls Schools across Uttar Pradesh, sought a mandamus directing their regularization, payment of basic salary, and inclusion in welfare schemes. They relied on a recent Lucknow Bench judgment that …
Manoj Yadav, an In‑charge Headmaster, filed a writ petition seeking to quash his suspension order dated 01‑06‑2026 issued by the District Basic Education Officer, Etawah, and to be allowed to continue in his post with full salary and benefits. The respondent B.S.A. submitted that a charge‑sheet …
The petitioner, suffering from cancer, sought a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh Basic Shiksha Parishad (respondent No.2) to transfer him from District Bahraich to District Moradabad, where his wife is posted, and to decide his application dated 10‑09‑2026 promptly. The petitioner alleged that …
The petitioners, twenty teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters/Headmistresses, claimed entitlement to salary and arrears under a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They alleged that despite multiple representations to the competent authority, no decision had been rendered. The petition sought a …
The petitioners, ten teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters in a U.P. Basic Education Board school, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a Government Order dated 14‑10‑2025 and mandamus directing payment of salary and arrears. They claimed entitlement to full salary under a later Government …
The petitioners, fourteen teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay them the salary and benefits of a Headmaster, relying on a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They alleged that despite multiple representations to the competent …
The petitioners, thirteen in-charge headmasters, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay them the salary and benefits of a headmaster, relying on a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They claimed they had made several representations to the competent authority without any …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a summoning order and charge‑sheet in a criminal case involving sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. During the pendency of the petition, the parties engaged in mediation, …
The petitioners Smt. Khushbu Prajapati and another filed a criminal revision (No. 2212 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, challenging an earlier order. During the pendency of the revision, the parties to the underlying case (Harshit Raj Sangam …
The applicant, Harshit Raj Sangam, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20 March 2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Basti, in case No. 480/11/23 (Khushbu Prajapati and Another vs. Harshit Raj Sangam) …
Petitioner Kaushal Ahirwar, an untrained Assistant Teacher appointed in 1995 and later promoted to Head Master, challenged an order dated 04‑08‑2026 issued by the District Basic Education Officer that declared respondent No. 5 senior to him on the basis of a higher grade‑pay, thereby affecting his …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The respondent's counsel submitted that the relief prayed for had already been granted to the petitioners, rendering the petition infructuous. The petitioner's counsel did not contest this submission. The …
The petitioner, Shipra Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the respondents to renew her appointment as a part‑time instructor at an upper primary school and to pay her honorarium. She claimed that her contract, originally dated 20‑06‑2013, continued until the 2024‑2025 …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Singh Pali, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Secretary of the U.P. Basic Education Board to consider his candidature for district allotment and to decide his representation dated 27.05.2026. He alleged that despite having higher quality point marks, …
The petitioner, Prabhat Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State respondent No.3 to address his grievance and decide on his complaint letters dated 06.07.2026 and 07.07.2026. The respondents argued that the petitioner, being only a complainant and not an aggrieved party, lacked …
The petitioner, Smt. Rajni Sharma, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of U.P. and other respondents to renew her appointment as a part‑time instructor for the 2026‑27 session. She had served as a part‑time instructor from 2013 to 2024 and again in 2025‑26, but the respondents did …
The petitioners, twelve teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters in primary/composite schools, filed a writ petition seeking direction for the payment of Headmaster salary and arrears, relying on a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They alleged that despite several representations to the competent …
The Committee of Management of Jhauwa Dharmnagar Sanskrit filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Vice Chancellor of Sampurnanand Vishwavidyalaya to decide an application dated 10 July 2026 for nomination of subject experts for three assistant teacher posts. The petitioners argued …
Eleven petitioners, who are government employees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to re-fix their salaries with the first increment as of 01‑01‑2017, to pay regular monthly salaries thereafter, and to compute and disburse all arrears arising from such re‑fixation. …
Mohd Taufeeq, a retired Class‑IV employee (peon) who retired on 31‑01‑2025, filed a writ petition seeking the release of his General Provident Fund (GPF) and arrears of salary with interest. The petitioner alleged that despite retirement, the dues had not been paid. The court, after hearing counsel, …
The petitioner, Mahboob Ali, an In‑charge Headmaster, filed a writ petition seeking quash of a Government order dated 14‑Oct‑2025 and an order dated 20‑Jan‑2026 passed by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, District Muzaffarnagar, and a mandamus directing payment of his salary and arrears. He contended that …
The petitioner, Nisha Rai, who is serving as In‑charge Headmistress, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to pay her salary and arrears as Headmaster and to decide a representation she had filed on 13‑07‑2026. She relied on a Government Order …
The petitioner, Nishi, a candidate of OBC category with merit rank 34 in the U.P. TGT 2022 exam, sought reallocation of her institution allotment under the applicable reservation law and Rule 12(10) of the U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board Rules, 1998. She filed a representation with …
The petitioners, 26 teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters/Headmistresses, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay their salaries and arrears under a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026, and to compel the District Basic Education Officer to decide pending …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar Srivastava, a government teacher appointed on 28‑12‑2005, filed a writ petition seeking mandatory payment of all legally admissible annual increments and arrears under the Sixth Pay Commission and applicable service rules. He alleged that after being initially posted to a …
The petitioner, a retired government employee, challenged a recovery order of Rs. 1,55,375 issued by the District Basic Education Officer and a subsequent letter from the school manager, alleging that the order was passed nine years after his retirement without any notice or hearing and without any …
The petitioners, 163 In-charge Headmasters/Headmistresses, filed a writ seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to pay their salaries and arrears pursuant to a Government Order dated 16.07.2026 and to decide pending representations. They also invoked a prior judgment (Tripurari Dubey v. State …
The petitioners, a group of 37 employees, filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of communications issued by the Finance Controller and the Director of Education, and demanded that their salaries be re‑fixed with the first increment as of 01‑01‑2017 along with payment of arrears and interest. …
The petitioners, a group of 54 education employees, sought quashing of a Finance Controller communication and a Director of Education order, and demanded that their salaries be re‑fixed with the first increment effective from 1 January 2017 along with payment of arrears and interest. The Court noted …
Petitioner Deepak Agrawal, a headmaster, challenged a transfer order dated 27.08.2026 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Basic Education, U.P., arguing that the order was made without jurisdiction and violated the online procedural requirement for teacher transfers. The transfer stemmed from …
The petitioners, 51 teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters/Headmistresses, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and the District Basic Education Officer to pay them salary and arrears of salary pursuant to a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They alleged that despite …
The petitioners, a group of 117 teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters/Headmistresses, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order dated 05.01.2026 issued by the District Basic Education Officer, Sonbhadra, and mandamus directing payment of salary and arrears pursuant to a Government Order …
The writ petition (Writ‑A No. 2051 of 2019) was filed by Gayadas Paramhans Vidhyapeeth and others against the State of U.P. and others. The case remained pending since 2019 and was listed as an old case for priority hearing. The court issued a notice that old cases up to 2022 must be taken up and, …
The writ petition filed by Ramesh Chandra in 2014 remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The High Court had issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be taken up and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Despite these …
The writ petition filed by Keshav Singh in 2014 remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The High Court noted that the case was listed among the oldest pending matters and a notice had been issued requiring parties to indicate whether the cause of action …
The writ petition filed by Ramotar in 2014 remained pending for over a decade. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the petition marked to indicate …
The writ petition filed by Rampal in 2014 remained pending for over a decade with no appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The court noted a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be taken up and dismissed as infructuous if there was no appearance or indication that the cause of action …
The writ petition filed by Smt. Shashi against the State of U.P. and others has been pending since 2014. The High Court issued a notice that old cases up to 2022 would be heard in the first round and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Prem Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and only counsel for one of the respondents was present. The Court observed that the petition was not prosecuted. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for want …
The writ petition (Writ‑A No. 39496 of 2014) was filed by Prem Singh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The matter had been pending since 2014 and was listed as an oldest pending case for priority hearing. No counsel appeared for the petitioner and the case was not marked to indicate …
The writ petition (Writ‑A No. 40014 of 2014) was filed by Rajendra Singh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The case remained pending since 2014 and was listed among the oldest cases for a priority hearing. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the petition was not marked to …
The writ petition filed by Arvind Singh in 2014 remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The High Court noted that the case was listed among the oldest pending matters and a notice had been issued requiring parties to indicate whether the cause of action …
The writ petition filed by Ram Swaroop in 2014 remained pending for over a decade. The court issued a notice that all old cases up to 2022 would be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case marked to show that the …
The writ petition filed by Smt. Somwati in 2014 remained pending for over a decade. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not mark the case to indicate that the cause of action still survived, despite a notice directing parties to do so for old cases. The court noted that the case …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court, but neither party appeared before the court. The petition was not prosecuted further. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim orders that may have been in place.
The writ petition filed by Mukesh Kumar in 2014 remained pending for over a decade. The court issued notices directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case marked to show that the …
The petitioner was selected as Assistant Teacher in a junior high school in Gorakhpur and appointed on 16‑05‑1988, but the District Basic Education Officer disapproved the appointment on 31‑12‑1988 for violating the prescribed SC reservation. The petitioner claimed that, under Rule 10(5)(iii) of the …
The petitioner, a confirmed Assistant Teacher, was appointed in 2015 after his qualifications were verified. In 2018 a complaint alleged he had used forged certificates, leading to a salary stoppage and later, in 2019, termination of his services without a full departmental inquiry or charge‑sheet. …
Smt. Shyam Dulari filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 1235 of 2019) in the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and three others. The petition was listed as likely to become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court issued a notice that old cases pending up to 2022 would be dismissed …
The petitioner, Seema Devi, filed Writ‑A No. 2093 of 2021 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed as a writ likely to have become infructuous and a notice was issued that old cases up to 2022 would be dismissed if the parties did not appear or indicate that the cause of action still …
Mukesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 4131 of 2021) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was listed for hearing, but neither of the petitioner's counsel appeared, nor was the case marked to show that the cause of action still survived. The court, noting …
The petitioner, Ekramullah Khan, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court in 2020. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the scheduled date, and the case was listed as potentially infructuous due to the passage of time. The court noted a notice requiring parties to indicate if the cause …
The petitioners filed Writ‑A No. 13843 of 2021 in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The case was listed under writs likely to have become infructuous, and a notice required counsel to indicate if the cause of action still survived. Neither the petitioners’ counsel …
The petitioner, Dev Prakash, filed Writ A No. 17912 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and five others. The petition was listed for hearing but the petitioner’s counsel, Ramesh Kumar Shukla, did not appear on the scheduled date. The case was categorized …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2019 but failed to appear before the court. The court had issued a notice that old cases up to 2022 would be dismissed as infructuous if the parties did not appear or indicate that the cause of action still survived. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 18683 of 2019) was filed by Shri Krishan against the State of U.P. and others. The petition remained pending since 2019 and the petitioner’s counsel, Ravindra Kumar, did not appear for the hearing. The case was listed under "writs likely to have become infructuous" and a …
The petitioner, Shashi Kant, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 19943 of 2019) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was listed as likely to become infructuous due to the passage of time. No counsel for the petitioner appeared before the court, nor was the petition marked …
The petitioner, Meetoo Ram, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 19585 of 2019) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the scheduled date, and the petition was not marked to indicate that the cause of action still survived. The court noted that the matter had been …
The petitioner, Rajeev Sharma, filed Writ A No. 8515 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition remained pending since 2022 without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The court issued a notice directing that old cases be taken …
The petitioner, Nand Kishore Gaur, filed Writ A No. 7575 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition remained pending since 2019 and the petitioner’s counsel failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted a procedural notice that old …
Petitioner Smt. Radhika Devi filed Writ Petition No. 11423 of 2021 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. The petition remained unattended as the petitioner’s counsel did not appear for the hearing. The case was listed under writs likely to have …
The petitioners filed Writ‑A No. 10071 of 2020 in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another respondent. No counsel appeared on the scheduled date and the petition was not marked to indicate that the cause of action still survived. The court, noting a notice that …
The petitioner, Kanti Devi, filed a writ petition seeking payment of salary for the post of Headmaster at Uchh Prathmik Vidyalaya, Semari, alleging that she was promoted by order dated 03.07.2015 and had been functioning in that capacity but had not received salary. The respondents, including the …
The petitioner, a headmaster in Meerut, challenged a suspension order dated 28 July 2026 issued by the District Basic Education Officer after an incident at his school that led to a gathering of guardians and an enquiry report alleging negligence. He contended that he had left the school prior to …
The petitioners, 55 assistant teachers, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the respondents to deposit their monthly contributions under the National Pension Scheme (NPS) from the date of their appointment, relying on Clauses 2(Ka) and 2(Ga) of a Government Order dated 13‑02‑2019. …
Petitioners filed a writ petition supported by an affidavit sworn by Arvind Kumar Tiwari, who was not related to or personally known by any of the 13 petitioners, all assistant teachers. Respondent BSA counsel raised a preliminary objection questioning the validity of the affidavit on the ground of …
The petitioner, Smt Kanya Kumari, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus orders directing the respondents to consider her representation dated 27 July 2026, and to calculate and pay pension arrears, death-cum-gratuity, and group insurance scheme amounts with 15% interest, based on the revised 6th …
The petitioner, Sunita, who had been appointed as an "Anudeshak" and served until 2021, applied for renewal of her service after recovering from a medical condition. She claimed that she had sought medical leave and subsequently requested renewal, but no action was taken by the authorities. The …
The petitioner, a school official, challenged a suspension order dated 14‑08‑2026 issued by the District Basic Education Officer on several allegations, including delayed construction of a handicap toilet, low assessment percentages on the Nipun Plus app, and alleged misuse of mid‑day meal funds. …
The petitioners, 21 teachers serving as officiating Headmasters in junior high and primary schools, sought a mandamus directing the State to fix and pay them the salary of regular Headmasters under the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981, and to decide a series of pending …
The petitioners, fifty teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to pay them the salary and arrears due under a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They alleged that despite several representations to the competent authority, no …
The petitioner, Gopal Ji, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. to consider and decide his representation dated 16‑08‑2026 for a scribe and compensatory time facility in the upcoming Assistant Professor examination on 18‑09‑2026. He had previously obtained a similar …
Manish Kumar applied for the post of Regional Inspector (Technical) where the advertisement required a valid heavy motor vehicle licence. He possessed only a learner's licence at the time of filing and later obtained a permanent licence after the application deadline, leading to the cancellation of …
The petitioners, Udai Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for either party when the matter was called. The court noted the absence of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition …
The petitioners, led by counsel Rahul Sahai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The petition was listed but the petitioner failed to appear before the court despite a revised call. The respondents, …
The writ petition filed by Manju Singh against the State of U.P. and others was listed for hearing but the petitioner’s counsel did not appear. The case was categorized as likely to have become infructuous due to the passage of time since its filing in 2015. A notice required parties to indicate …
The petitioner, Vindhyachal Yadav, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 10551 of 2019) in the Allahabad High Court. The petition remained pending since 2019 and the petitioner’s counsel did not appear for the hearing. The case was listed as potentially infructuous under the court’s notice for old …
The petitioner, Ram Taul, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 11863 of 2020) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four others. The petition was listed but the petitioner’s counsel did not appear, nor was the case marked to show that the cause of action …
Petitioners Smt. Sharad and two others filed Writ‑A No. 19362 of 2018 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petition was argued by counsel B.S. Pandey for the petitioners and by Ashok Kumar Singh, Awadhesh Kumar and …
The petitioners, appointed as Assistant Teachers in two grant‑in‑aid junior high schools in Basti, claimed salary arrears from December 2006, relying on their appointments under the Uttar Pradesh Recognised Basic Schools (Junior High School) Rules, 1978 and an exemption‑from‑training certificate …
The petition filed by Jaiveer Kumar in 2011 before the Allahabad High Court remained unattended as neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case marked to show that the cause of action survived. The court noted that the matter was listed among writs likely to have become infructuous due …
Sanjay Kumar Rai filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 67871 of 2010) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition was listed but no further pleadings or evidence were filed, and the parties did not appear. The court noted that the petition …
The petitioner filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 32262 of 2015) in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. The case remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The court listed the matter as likely to have become …
The petitioners, a group of 26 basic education employees, filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of a communication dated 18‑11‑2025 and an order dated 21‑11‑2025 that fixed their salaries, and requested that they be granted the first increment effective from 01‑01‑2017 along with all arrears. …
The petitioner, Ajay Singh @ Raju Gautam, filed a writ petition in 2014 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the hearing date, and the petition was not marked to indicate that the cause of action still survived. The court noted that the case had been pending for …
The petitioners, a group of 91 basic education employees, filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of a communication dated 18‑11‑2025 issued by the Finance Controller and an order dated 21‑11‑2025 issued by the Director of Education, and prayed for the re‑fixation of their salaries with the first …
The petitioners, selected as Assistant Teachers in Uttar Pradesh’s Junior Basic Schools, were appointed despite not possessing the required Basic Teacher Certificate (BTC) by the application deadline of 22‑12‑2018; they later obtained the BTC after back‑paper results in 2019 and served for several …
The petitioners, 33 teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay their salaries and arrears pursuant to a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026 and to decide pending representations, citing a prior judgment of 30‑04‑2025. The respondents …
Petitioner Arun Kumar filed a writ petition challenging a prior order. Counsel for the petitioner informed the court that subsequent developments rendered the existing petition unnecessary and sought permission to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition if needed. The court, after …
The petitioners, four employees, sought the benefit of the Old Pension Scheme based on a Government Order dated 28‑06‑2024, alleging that their claim was pending before the District Basic Education Officer, Bijnor (respondent No.5). They filed a writ petition requesting the court to direct the …
The petitioners, 28 in‑charge headmasters, filed a writ seeking mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer, Hathras, to consider their representations and to order payment of their salaries and arrears pursuant to a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026 and a prior judgment in Special …
The petitioner, a retired Assistant Teacher as of 31 March 2025, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the respondents to pay his pension and related retirement benefits, which he claimed were pending despite a prior representation. The respondents argued that the petitioner must file a …
The petitioners, eleven In‑charge Headmasters, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to pay their salaries and arrears of salary as per a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They claimed that despite multiple representations to the competent authority, no …
The petitioner, Akhil Kumar, an In‑charge Headmaster, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 09‑07‑2025 issued by the District Basic Education Officer, Siddharth Nagar, seeking salary and arrears of salary as per a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. He prayed for a certiorari to quash the …
The petitioner, Zaid Ahmad, an In‑charge Headmaster, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 09‑07‑2025 issued by the District Basic Education Officer of Siddharth Nagar, seeking salary and arrears as per a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. He prayed for a certiorari to quash the impugned …
The petitioners, ten teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters in Gorakhpur, sought a writ of certiorari to quash a Government order and mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer to release their salaries and arrears and to decide pending representations. They relied on a Government …
The petitioner, a former Assistant Teacher who took voluntary retirement, applied for gratuity on 23‑01‑2023 and later sought interest on the delayed payment. Earlier writ petitions resulted in the court directing payment of gratuity with interest, and a Division Bench affirmed the application date …
The petitioners, Ramesh Kumar and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to compute their defence service, include it with present service, and fix their pensionary benefits as per Civil Service Regulation 526. They alleged that multiple representations to the …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer (BSA) of Hapur to consider his compassionate appointment application filed on 24‑04‑2025 after his wife, an assistant teacher, died in harness, and also to release full salary …
Dr. Birbal Ram filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide an objection dated 23‑10‑2019 and to issue the final seniority list for the post of Lecturer in a Government Ayurvedik College, as well as to consider a representation dated 03‑12‑2025. The petitioner …
Sixteen petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Secretary of the U.P. Basic Education Board to consider their candidature for the post of Assistant Teacher (Science and Mathematics) advertised on 11 July 2013. They alleged that their grievance regarding selection and appointment …
The petitioner, Bachcha Lal, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Vice‑Chancellor of Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, to grant interest on arrears of payments due from 19‑April‑2018 to 23‑June‑2022. He claimed that he had made several representations …
Prof. Ravi Prasad Srivastava, a government employee, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Director of Education (Higher Education), U.P., to sanction his gratuity and encashment of 79 days of earned leave. He relied on the Supreme Court judgment in Avdhesh Kumar Singh v. State …
The petitioner, Bhagwat Saran, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 22 April 2026 of the District Basic Education Officer, Bareilly, which rejected his claim for a disability family pension on the ground that a disability certificate was not produced during the lifetime of the …
The petitioner, Bhupal Singh, was recommended for the post of Headmaster in a junior high school under the U.P. Basic Education Act, 1972, but his appointment was rejected because the selection process was completed after the deadline set by a Government Order dated 03.06.2016, which required …
Petitioners Kamla Kant Ojha and three others filed Writ Petition (A) No. 7045 of 2017 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and ten others. The petition was listed but no petitioner counsel appeared to press the petition. The Standing Counsel for the State …
The petitioner, Mani Raj, filed writ petition No. 10381 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the D.D.C. and others. The matter had been pending since 1983 and was listed under the oldest pending cases for priority hearing. The court issued a notice that old cases up to 2022 …
The second appeal filed by Bhola and others, originally instituted in 1982, remained pending for over four decades. No counsel appeared for the appellants, and the case was not marked to indicate that the cause of action still survived, despite a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be dealt …
The petitioner, Kapil Kumar, sought a compassionate appointment after his father, a headmaster, died leaving his family destitute. He filed multiple writ petitions challenging the inaction of the District Basic Education Officer, Meerut, and was initially directed to approach the authorities. …
The petitioner, Pratibha Trivedi, filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of seven teachers in a primary section despite low student numbers, and sought an adjournment citing the illness of one of six counsels. The court noted that only one counsel was ill while five others were available, …
Bhim Sen filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 67251 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the parties, though the State's standing counsel was present. The Court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, …
Petitioners Amit Saraswat and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No parties appeared to argue the case despite a revised call, though the standing counsel was present. The Court observed the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …
Nine petitioners, all Head Masters, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the District Basic Education Officer (respondent No.5) to pay them the promotional increment and arrears with interest. The respondents indicated no objection to the petitioners filing fresh individual …
Petitioner Nafees Ahmad Ansari challenged an order dated 12‑04‑2026 that deputed him to Census 2027 training and duty despite his representation seeking exemption on personal hardship grounds. He argued that the order violated Section 27 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, …
Anit Kumar, an officiating Headmaster at Shaheed Udham Singh Junior High School since 1 April 2025, filed a writ petition seeking the grant of Headmaster pay scale benefits and arrears, alleging that his claim was pending before the District Basic Education Officer (respondent No.3). The petitioner …
The petitioner, Dulari, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Finance and Accounts Officer (respondent No.3) to decide the gratuity claim of her late husband as per a Government order dated 24-12-2025. The petitioner alleged that despite multiple representations, no action was taken. The …
The petitioners, a group of Shiksha Mitras employed on a contractual basis in primary schools under the Board of Basic Education Uttar Pradesh, sought a direction for their regularisation as Assistant Teachers. They relied on several Supreme Court judgments and a Ministry of Education direction that …
The petitioners, a group of 106 candidates, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to extend the benefit of a Supreme Court judgment dated 29 January 2025 (State of U.P. v. Neeraj Kumar Pandey) to their claims for appointment as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics …
Petitioner Anil Kumar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Man Bahadur Singh, later requested that the petition not be pressed. The court, noting the petitioner's request, dismissed the writ petition as not pressed. No substantive issues were …
The petitioner, Neeraj Bhadauriya, filed a writ petition seeking re‑appointment as Shiksha Mitra in a primary school after being denied the post following her marriage in 2006. She alleged that despite repeated representations, the authorities failed to act. The respondents argued that the petition …
The petitioner, Aditya Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging a suspension order dated 12‑02‑2026 issued by the District Basic Education Officer, Pilibhit, on the ground of alleged non‑performance of his duties as a Basic Education Officer (BLO). The petitioner sought quashing of the suspension …
The petitioner, Smt. Rekha Rani, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The respondents, through their counsel, objected that the petition was premature and not maintainable. The petitioner’s counsel sought …
Aditya Prakash Dwivedi and another petitioners filed a writ seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India to exempt them from house‑listing duties under a notification dated 7 January 2026, claiming that a prior order in Civil Appeal No. 1385 of 2025 required them to complete the Teacher …
The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari to quash a Government order dated 07‑04‑2022 that denied them age‑relaxation and regular BTC status in the selection for Assistant Teacher posts. The respondents contended that the petition was barred as a second writ, since a similar petition (Writ A …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Basic Education Officer, Mainpuri, to consider his claim for fixation as Officiating Headmaster from 01‑07‑2011 to his retirement on 30‑06‑2013 and to award the corresponding retiral dues and pension. The …
The petitioner, Arun Kumar Dwivedi, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Basic Education Officer, Mainpuri, to consider his claim for fixation as Officiating Headmaster from 30‑06‑2012 until his retirement on 31‑03‑2024 and to award the corresponding retiral dues and pension. He …
The petitioner, Surendra Nath Srivastav, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Basic Education Officer, Mainpuri, to consider his claim for fixation as Officiating Headmaster from 01‑07‑2013 to his retirement on 31‑03‑2018 and to award the corresponding retiral dues and pension. …
