Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
285 judgments · newest first · showing 201–285
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 24‑02‑2026 and a mandamus to prevent their arrest, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been amicably settled and the compromise deed was verified by the magistrate. Both parties’ counsel …
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 2578 of 2026) was filed by Vipin Singh @ Vippa Parihar against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court …
Petitioner Prashant filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to produce CCTV footage from a police station for specific dates. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to pursue other remedies. The …
Mahesh Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioners were represented by counsel Anees Ahmad, while the State was represented by G.A. The petitioners failed to appear in …
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 19‑04‑2026 filed under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 72 of 2026, Meerut. They prayed that before any arrest the police be directed to follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State opposed the merits …
Petitioners Subash Prajapati and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 15-11-2025, registered under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, and a direction that they not be arrested. The State opposed the petition and informed …
Nasir Husain and ten others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioners failed to appear before the court even after a revised call, while the respondent's Additional Government Advocate …
The petitioner, Mohammad Rafi, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19462 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petition was listed for hearing and a revised call was made, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. …
The petitioner, Sovindra, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19526 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Hemant Sharma, prayed for leave to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to pursue any other appropriate remedy. The State of U.P., …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an FIR dated 26.05.2026 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(2) of the B.N.S. The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had already been filed on …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad listed Amendment Application No. 3 of 2026 along with previous papers in Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19341 of 2026 filed by Taksham Malik and others against the State of U.P. and others. The order was dated 9 September 2026 and signed by Judges …
The petitioners, Mohd Islam and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 23 July 2026 under Section 420 IPC. They prayed that before any arrest, the police should adhere to the Supreme Court's guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar …
Petitioner Arun filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his detention. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and placed in jail, rendering the petition moot. The State's Additional Government Advocate and the private respondent …
The petitioner, Mohd Asif, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 20‑06‑2026 under Sections 316(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. and to obtain a direction that the police not arrest him. The petitioner also requested that any arrest follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh …
Petitioners Tabank Ansari and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 24 June 2026, registered under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and to restrain their arrest. They also prayed that the police adhere to the Supreme Court …
Petitioners Ramesh Rajput and two others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19468 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue an appropriate remedy elsewhere. The State's counsel, …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 26.05.2026 and a direction restraining the respondent from arresting him. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had already been filed on …
Petitioners Abhimanyu Yadav and four others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20040 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave of the Court to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any other appropriate remedy. The …
Petitioner Rajnish Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared on the revised call, though the State's counsel was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and held that the petition was not being prosecuted. Consequently, …
Manoj Bhati filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the police to conclude the investigation of Case Crime No. 1417 of 2019, which involves offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC, after a CBI charge‑sheet was filed on 30‑06‑2022. The …
Laxman filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20763 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Deepak Kumar Tripathi, later sought leave to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any appropriate remedy under law. The State of U.P. and other …
The petitioner filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 25861 of 2025 in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State …
Petitioner Smt Krishna filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Uma Nath Pandey, prayed for leave to withdraw the petition. The respondents, represented by G.A., raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing, …
The petitioners, Bilal Ahmad and five others, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 25‑05‑2025 that alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had earlier settled their marital dispute through a …
Petitioners Preetam Singh and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 12181 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue any other appropriate remedy. The State, represented by the …
Petitioner Omveer Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair, impartial and expeditious investigation of an FIR dated 22-04-2026 and to produce the case diary and investigation records before the court. The State, represented by the learned …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 22‑04‑2026 under Sections 109(1), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. 2023 and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest him while the petition was pending. After arguments, the petitioner’s counsel …
S.J. Enterprises filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 14031 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating the petitioner would pursue other …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 22‑04‑2026 and a mandamus to restrain their arrest. The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed on 21‑07‑2026, supporting its position with a short …
The petitioners Ajay Notiyal and three others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15994 of 2026 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. They were represented by counsel Anju Yadav, Vivek Kumar Sharma, Ashutosh Tripathi, Kuldeep Singh, Puneet Kumar and Vikas Kumar Yadav. During …
The petitioner, Jigar Sahni, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 16272 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Akash Kumar Verma, subsequently moved the Court for leave to withdraw the petition. The respondent, the State of Uttar Pradesh, through the Attorney …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 18.05.2026 (Case Crime No.189 of 2026) and a direction restraining the third respondent from arresting him. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) and 194(2) of the Indian Penal Code. …
A writ petition (Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 16566 of 2026) was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad by C.B. Singh @ Chandrabali Singh against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioner’s counsel, Rajnish Kumar Verma, sought leave to withdraw the petition after hearing. …
The petitioner, Rang Bahadur, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of FIR No. 245/2024 under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, informed the …
Petitioners filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18004 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and others. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners moved the Court for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 14‑05‑2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel made an innocuous prayer to withdraw the petition and seek alternative remedies. The …
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 14 July 2026 and to restrain the police from arresting them, invoking the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State opposed the merits of the petition but did not object to an innocuous prayer that the police follow those …
The petitioners, Mohd Karim and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition. The counsel for one of the respondents, Rohit Singh, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 11.05.2026 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him until a charge-sheet is filed. After arguments, the petitioner’s counsel made an innocuous prayer to withdraw the petition and seek …
The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Kumar Majhi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 20 July 2026 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest him. …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 20‑07‑2026 and a mandamus to restrain their arrest under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act. After arguments, the petitioner's counsel made an innocuous prayer to withdraw the petition and …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 11‑07‑2026 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them under several penal provisions. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 01.07.2026 (Case Crime No. 0139 of 2026) and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a …
Awadesh Pathak filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 22‑06‑2026 under sections 318(4), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. The petitioner also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down …
Petitioners Nadeem Khan and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of FIR No. 272 of 2026 and a mandamus to prevent their arrest under sections 85, 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. 2023 and the 3/4 D.P. Act. They prayed that the police, before making any arrest, …
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 20695 of 2026) was filed by Jagpal and three others against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioners' counsel, Jitendra Kumar Yadav, failed to appear even after a revised call. Respondent counsel, including C.P. Pandey and the Additional …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 under sections 333, 352, 115(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners also made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the arrest …
Petitioner Sonara Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking (1) a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 03.08.2026 under Sections 80(2), 85 of the BNS Act read with Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, and (2) a mandamus directing the State not to arrest her under the same FIR. After hearing, …
Petitioners Omprakash Gond and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 03.08.2026 (Crime No. 279 of 2026) under Sections 80(2), 85 of the BNS Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest them. After …
The petitioner Anil Kumar filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 17.08.2026 under Sections 221, 132 and 352 and a direction that he not be arrested. The petitioner’s counsel prayed, as an innocuous request, that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar …
Petitioner Aysha Khatoon filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to order a CBI investigation under Sections 318(4) and 351(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR dated 10-10-2025. The State, through the learned Additional …
Shivam Singh Rathore filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 06‑02‑2026 registered under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 125 and 127(2) of the B.N.S. and to obtain a direction that he not be arrested. He also prayed that the police, before making any arrest, follow the Supreme …
Petitioner Arvind Kumar Gupta filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21358 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating the petitioner would pursue any other appropriate remedy. The State, represented by the …
Petitioners Rahis Khan and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners prayed for leave to withdraw the petition and to seek any other appropriate remedy. The State and other respondents, represented by the learned …
Petitioner Kaushal Katiyar filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 24.01.2026 under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 352 and 351(3) B.N.S., and a direction restraining his arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge‑sheet had already …
Petitioners Ram Khelawan and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 23‑06‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They requested the police to follow the Supreme Court's guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar regarding arrests. The …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 0245 of 2026 (sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 of the B.N.S.) and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners later made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines …
Petitioners Keshav Rajput and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 15‑08‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273 before …
The petitioners, Rais Ahmad and another, filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 22‑08‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They argued that the police should follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar regarding arrest procedures. The State …
Arun Tunda filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 26.07.2026 under Sections 276, 277, 318 and 319 of the B.N.S.S. and a direction that he not be arrested. The petitioner also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar …
Petitioners Arun Dagar and three others filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 05.08.2026 under Section 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. and a direction that they not be arrested. The petitioners prayed that any arrest should follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State …
The petitioner, Surendra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition, seeking to pursue other legal remedies. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, raised …
Petitioners Pappu Yadav and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 19‑03‑2026 under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2) and 324(4) and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar …
The petitioner, Mohd Ansar Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 26-11-2025 under Section 318(4) of the B.N.S.S. and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2008, and also requested that the police not arrest him. The petitioner’s counsel prayed that, if arrest were …
Petitioners Dr. Raina Nivedita Samuel and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 0181 of 2026, registered under sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the B.N.S., and a direction restraining their arrest. They contended that the investigation had …
The petitioner, Rameshwar Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2 and No.3 to order respondent No.4 to submit documentary evidence filed on 28‑10‑2025 and to comply with an order dated 28‑11‑2025. The petitioner also prayed to approach the …
Petitioner Sabir filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 11‑07‑2026 under Sections 74, 352 and 351(3) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act and a direction that he not be arrested. The petitioner’s counsel requested that, before any arrest, the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid …
Petitioner Ujjwal Kumar Jaisawal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 27‑07‑2026 (Crime No. 0228/2026) under sections 331(3) and 305 of the BNS, 2023, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest him. The State, through the learned Additional …
Petitioners Mohd Ahsan and seven others filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 17‑08‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any arrest. The State opposed the merits …
Petitioner Rishi Kumar Budhauriya filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 12.08.2026 and a mandamus to restrain his arrest. After arguments, the petitioner’s counsel requested leave to withdraw the petition, offering to pursue other remedies. The …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Kushwaha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 20.08.2026 under Sections 106 and 123 of the BNS and a mandamus to restrain his arrest. After arguing, the petitioner’s counsel requested leave to withdraw the petition, …
The petitioners Deen Mohammad and another filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 20.08.2026 under Sections 85, 352, 115(2), 79, 127(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and a direction that they not be arrested. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid …
The petitioners Sumit and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and two others. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue any other …
The petitioners, Natthu Yadav alias Ashok and another, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 29621 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners even after the revised call, while the learned …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, U.P., to decide representations submitted on 18‑06‑2025 and 16‑07‑2025 within a fixed period. The petitioner’s counsel also requested permission to file a fresh representation and a …
The appeal filed by Jagdish, Pratap and Tirath against the State of U.P. was considered by the Allahabad High Court. An official report confirmed that appellant No. 3, Tirath, died on 20 February 2025. The court noted that the appeal against appellants No. 1 and No. 2 (Jagdish and Pratap) had …
The appellant, Sarvendra, filed a criminal appeal (No. 5050 of 2015) against the State of U.P. While the appeal was pending, an office report dated 02-02-2018, based on a report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Firozabad, confirmed that the appellant had died. The High Court, after taking note of …
The appellant Harcharan was convicted by the trial court for murder and attempt to murder under Sections 302/34 and 307 IPC based on the testimony of the complainant and other witnesses who claimed the accused entered the victim's house at night and fired. On appeal, the High Court examined the …
The appellants, Shivcharan and Hazari Lal, were subjected to a non‑bailable warrant after an order dated 13‑02‑2026 directed their production before the Allahabad High Court. They contended that a coordinate bench had already acquitted them in Criminal Appeal No. 1833 of 1987, but the acquittal …
The appellant Brijendra Singh filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. The matter was heard by a bench of two judges, with counsel Kamal Singh and V.P. Pathak representing the appellant and A.G.A. representing the State. No facts or legal issues were detailed …
The appellants Lakhmi, Languri and Yogesh were convicted for the brutal murder, beheading and assault of Chameli Devi and the injury of her grandson Krishna Kumar, under Sections 302/34, 307/34, 509/34 and 506 IPC. The appellants appealed, arguing that the child witness’s testimony contained …
The appellant Mahesh alias Munna Yadav was convicted for murder and offences under the Arms Act arising from a land‑dispute‑related shooting that killed Bhola Yadav and Vinod Yadav. The prosecution relied on the informant’s statement, medical post‑mortem reports, forensic ballistics linking the …
The High Court examined an appeal against a Sessions Court conviction of Irfan, Faeem and Saleem for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and abetment (Sec. 120B IPC) based on a FIR lodged 49 hours after the incident. The prosecution alleged the accused deliberately ran over the deceased with a tractor, supported …
The petitioners, Atlantis College of Education and another, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a trust deed registration and mandamus directing various respondents to consider their objections and allow participation in a society election. The petitioners' counsel also made an innocuous …
