Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
94 judgments · newest first · showing 1–94
The petitioner, a part‑time teacher appointed in 1995 and retired in 2025, sought entitlement to the Old Pension Scheme despite later being approved as a full‑time teacher. The Court examined the factual record and relied on its earlier decision in Vanita Rajendra Bhadule v. State of Maharashtra, …
Sachin Vikas Kadam and another, represented by power of attorney holder Dasharath Dhondiba Jadhav, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging an order of the District Collector, Satara. The petition was heard by a two‑judge bench comprising Justices …
The petitioner, Prashant Shamrao Shelake, challenged the appointment of Respondent No.3 as Sports Inspector, alleging that the appointment document was fabricated and that he lost his chance for the post. The High Court initially held that the writ petition was not maintainable and directed the …
The petitioner, Deepak Govind Deshpande, filed a contempt petition alleging that the Joint Director of Higher Education, Kolhapur Division, was delaying a proposal submitted by the Headmaster and Trustees of Respondent No. 3 to Shivaji University. The University had already reported on the proposal, …
The petitioners, who appeared in the merit list of a competitive examination for the post of cluster head/centre head, feared that their lack of MTET/CTET qualification would lead to disqualification from promotion. They filed a writ petition seeking directions to be considered for appointment …
The petitioners challenged the order of the competent authority that, under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956, rejected their application to refer an apportionment dispute concerning compensation for acquired land to a civil court. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Vinod …
The petitioners challenged the order of the competent authority that, under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956, rejected their application to refer an apportionment dispute concerning compensation for acquired land to a civil court. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Vinod …
The petitioners challenged the order of the competent authority that, under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956, rejected their application to refer an apportionment dispute concerning compensation for acquired land to a civil court. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Vinod …
Rohini Irgonda Patil, appointed as an Assistant Teacher in 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of her sanction proposal by the State of Maharashtra on alleged deficiencies. The Court examined the documents and found most deficiencies to be innocuous, noting that the only …
Amol Dilip Savarde, the decree holder, obtained a decree on 2 May 2023 in a summary suit filed in 2019. He filed execution proceedings but faced office objections and delayed action for over three years. The petitioner argued, citing Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi (2021) 6 SCC 418, that …
The petitioner, Kundlik Balu Ghure, claimed to be a project‑affected person entitled to alternate land after his lands were acquired in 2009. He argued that a 1995 partition deed between his father and himself made him eligible for alternate land, despite the State's position that his father had …
The petitioner, a 56‑year‑old driver employed by the Zilla Parishad Health Department, was transferred in March 2026 from Savarde to Panchayat Samiti, Bhudargad, a distance of about 100 km. He claimed that, under clause 3¼(k) of the Government Resolution dated 15 May 2014, his age made him eligible …
The petitioner, Deepak Rajaram Sawant, filed an interim application seeking a pre‑hearing amendment to his writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent appeared before the Kolhapur Circuit Bench. The Court examined whether the amendment …
The applicant filed Interim Application No. 1044 of 2026 seeking recall of the court's order dated 13 July 2026. The order was allegedly passed inadvertently because two writ petitions were pending, and compliance had been effected for only one of them. The respondent State informed the court that …
The petitioners, Mhatma Phule Krida Va. Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. On hearing, the petitioners moved that the petition be withdrawn, and the Court allowed the …
The petitioners, a teachers' association and a school management body, sought enforcement of a 2015 Government Resolution granting 100% aid and salary payments to teachers of a disabled persons' school, challenging a later 2018 resolution that altered those benefits. The State argued that the …
The petitioners, a group of teachers, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 1 July 2026 issued by the High Court. They sought specific textual corrections in paragraphs two and three of that order. The court examined whether such corrections were warranted and whether the Deputy Director …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 12 September 2022 issued by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Ratnagiri, which rejected the appointment of petitioner No.3 as a peon without providing any reasons, merely citing six Government Resolutions. The petitioners argued that such an …
The petitioner, Suvarna Anand Suryawanshi, was appointed to a government post before 1 November 2005 and contended that she should be governed by the Old Pension Scheme rather than the Deemed Continuation of Pension (DCPC) Scheme introduced on 31 October 2005. She claimed that despite a prior court …
The petitioner, owner of a plot in Solapur, sought de‑reservation of his land which had been earmarked for a playground under the Solapur Development Plan. He served a purchase notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, after the municipal corporation declared …
The petitioner, a land‑loser employee of Konkan Railway Corporation, was removed from service after nine years on the ground that he had furnished false information and failed to obtain NOCs from co‑owners of jointly owned land. He contended that the information was based on Tahsildar certificates, …
The petitioner, Sumit Bharat Akade, sought to withdraw his writ petition against Solapur Municipal Corporation and others, requesting the court's permission to pursue a statutory appeal under Section 56(4) of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, and a revisional remedy under Section 451 …
The petitioners, a teachers' association and a school management body, sought enforcement of a 2015 Government Resolution granting 100% aid and salary payments to teachers of a disabled persons' school, challenging a later 2018 resolution that altered those benefits. The State argued that the …
The petitioner, Wajid Lukman Mujawar, filed a writ petition challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the petition, the appointment sought by the petitioner was already effected and granted in his favour. The Court observed that since the relief sought had been …
The petitioner, Ashish Prakash Kapile, filed a writ petition seeking a transfer from his posting at Pophali to either Nashik or Bhusawal, citing an order of the Industrial Court dated 31 May 2023. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, contended that no suitable post exists at the …
The petitioner, Lata Mahadev Jadhav, a part‑time lecturer, filed a writ petition seeking conversion to a full‑time position in a government‑aided educational institution. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the managing body of the institution, were directed to prepare a proposal …
The Anjuman Ittehadul Islam, a society running a 100% aided school, challenged a order dated 17‑06‑2025 that permitted a rival school to start an additional 5th‑standard division, alleging that the order violated a 2019 Government Resolution which bars such permission within a 1 km neighbourhood and …
Vidya Ramesh Patil, a part‑time lecturer appointed before 1 Nov 2005 and later converted to full‑time, challenged an order dated 22 June 2023 by the Deputy Director of Education that denied her full service benefits and pension. The petitioner argued that the order relied on Government Resolutions …
The petitioner, Rajaram Mahadeo Patil, was appointed on a part‑time basis in two different colleges of the same educational institution in 1993 and 1995. He sought to be treated as a full‑time teacher under Government Resolutions dated 5 January 1982 and 12 August 1996, claiming salary, allowance …
The petitioner, Laxmi Bapu Kharat, a 70‑year‑old woman, claimed to be the second legally wedded wife of the deceased employee Bapu Bandu Kharat and sought direction for the State of Maharashtra and Mumbai Port Trust to grant her family pension and arrears. She produced a divorce decree of the first …
The petitioners, a cooperative society, sought a direction for the State Co-operative Election Authority to declare the election programme after the Administrator deposited the statutory amount. The court noted that the Administrator had been in office for nearly ten years, creating urgency for a …
Petitioner Abhijeet Balu Burange filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging actions of the Income Tax Officer, Ward‑2, Pandharpur and others. The petition was listed before a two‑judge bench comprising Justices M.S. Karnik and Ajit B. Kadethankar. Counsel …
The petitioners, five individuals claiming to be project‑affected persons, filed a writ petition in 2021 seeking execution of an order dated 11 August 2000 that allegedly allotted them land under Section 16 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. The petition was filed …
Petitioner Bharat Bajarang Ballal challenged an order dated 07.02.2026 passed by the Grievance Committee of Shivaji University, claiming it to be an appealable order before the University Tribunal. The High Court observed that an equally effective remedy exists in filing a statutory appeal before …
The petitioner, Manthan, challenged the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee that rejected his claim to belong to the “Koli Mahadev” Scheduled Tribe and consequently cancelled his admission to a reserved seat in an engineering college. He submitted over 54 documents, including …
The petitioner, Abhay Kuber Chougule, sought a Shalarth ID after his appointment was approved, but the Deputy Director of Education withheld it. The petitioner argued that the withholding was unjustified absent any fraud or misrepresentation. The court examined whether the Deputy Director could …
The petitioners, a group of schools, complied with the admission obligations under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 but have not received the statutory reimbursement and grants promised by the Government. They approached the Bombay High Court seeking directions for …
The Sangli Bar Association and another petitioner filed a writ petition seeking the allotment of three acres of alternate land adjacent to the Sangli District Court, after the court building was submerged during the 2019 floods. They argued that the vacant land in Vijaynagar, currently classified as …
The petitioner, Jaydeep Mahadev Devkar, filed a writ petition seeking direction for his appointment as Police‑Patil under the State of Maharashtra. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, expressed displeasure at granting relief given the peculiar facts of the case. The petitioner was …
The High Court considered a writ petition filed by Anisa Chicken Centre challenging a demand made by the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. The court held that the order impugned is appealable …
The Bombay High Court considered a praecipe filed by the appellants seeking a stay of its own order dated 12 June 2026, which had vacated an interim injunction concerning Survey No. 73/2B. The court examined the arguments of both sides, noting that the respondents' counsel had previously taken a …
The petitioners, who are defendants in a 2006 civil suit for recovery of Rs.18,00,771.72, challenged three orders of the trial court that closed evidence and barred cross‑examination because the defendants and their counsel were absent. They argued that the orders were harsh, especially given the …
The Saraswat Co‑op. Bank Ltd, a multi‑state cooperative bank, sought to dismiss a summary suit filed by Mulani Associates for recovery of professional fees for valuation services, arguing that the suit fell within Section 115 of the Multi‑State Co‑operative Societies Act, 2002 which requires prior …
The applicants, who are the original defendants, sought a revision of the trial court's order that refused to dismiss a suit filed by the respondent seeking declaration of ownership of a property. The property had been transferred to the applicants' father by a registered sale deed in 1982, and the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an ad‑interim order of the trial court, while a Miscellaneous Civil Application (MCA) was pending before the district court, which had already granted interim relief to the petitioner. The High Court noted that the planning authority should not act on …
The petitioners, Sunanda Deepak Gaikwad and others, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay challenging the respondents. On 8 May 2026, the petitioners filed a praecipe indicating their intention to withdraw the petition. The court heard counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Rohit Joshi. …
Snehal Gulab Ghule filed an appeal against an order dated 2025 and also moved an interim application. The appellant later filed a praecipe on 29 April 2026 indicating withdrawal of the appeal. The Court noted that the consent terms had been filed and the original suit had been disposed by the trial …
The petitioners, re‑grantees of Class‑II land under the Abolition of Patil Inam Watan Act, challenged a series of revenue orders that revived a 1973 mutation entry (No. 824) and later created a new mutation entry (No. 2028) in favour of private respondent Gajanan Govind Alimkar, who had forged a …
M/s. Koyna Power Ltd appealed Order No. 406 of 2026 dated 04.03.2026. By consent, the High Court set aside that order and directed that Notice of Motion No. 1903 of 2021 be heard and finally decided within six weeks of the parties' appearance before the Trial Court. The parties agreed to appear …
The appellant, Kumar Agro Products Pvt Ltd, sought substitution of the original plaintiff, Bhavani Peth Properties and Estate Pvt Ltd, with itself as the transferee company following a scheme of amalgamation. The trial court had earlier passed an order on 21 June 2019, which the appellant challenged …
The appellants, M/s. V. V. Enterprises and Ors, filed an appeal from Order No.392 of 2026 challenging a procedural order in Regular Civil Appeal No.25 of 2025 pending before the District Judge, Kalyan. They sought a time‑bound disposal of the appeal from order without any adjudication on the merits, …
The appellant, Noor Mohammed Ibrahim Tambe, filed an appeal against an order dated 2026. During the proceedings, the parties reconciled their dispute and executed a five‑page Minutes of Order, which was filed and marked for identification. The court accepted the Minutes of Order as binding …
The Jagdamba Co-operative Housing Society (the Society) entered into negotiations with M/s Parisparsh (the Developer) for redevelopment of the Society's dilapidated building, issuing a Letter of Intent (LOI) on 29‑05‑2021 and obtaining individual consents from its members by April 2022. Although a …
The Bombay High Court heard an appeal by Jagdamba Co‑operative Housing Society Ltd (the appellant) against an order of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kalyan, which had granted a temporary injunction in favour of M/s Parisparsh (the plaintiff) restraining the society from creating development …
Fernhill Garden CHS Ltd (the Society) appealed an ad‑interim order that barred the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai from taking over land in front of its building for a 9.5‑metre road‑widening project. The corporation issued a fresh notice under Section 299 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation …
The appellant, Minjal CHS Ltd., a society, challenged an ad‑interim order that allowed the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to issue a fresh notice under Section 299 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, to take over land and a compound wall in front of its building for a …
The trial court dismissed a suit filed by a partnership firm because it failed to produce a partnership certificate and disclose the names of its partners, violating Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act, 1932, and invoking Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. The plaintiff appealed, and the appellate court …
The petitioners, Anant Janardan Gharat and others, filed a writ petition challenging two orders of the Deputy Director of Land Records (DILR) that corrected the revenue records and mutation entry of a disputed property, condoning a delay of 58 years. The petitioners relied on a final judgment of the …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of interim applications filed in Second Appeal No. 132 of 2017 to bring on record the legal heirs of various deceased respondents. The court examined whether the heirs could be added as parties despite the passage of time and whether any procedural defaults such …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of interim applications filed in Second Appeal No. 132 of 2017 to bring on record the legal heirs of various deceased respondents. Each application sought permission to amend the pleadings, condone any delay in filing, and set aside any abatement that might have …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of interim applications filed in Second Appeal No. 132 of 2017 to bring on record the legal heirs of various deceased respondents. The court examined whether the heirs could be added as parties despite the passage of time and whether any procedural defaults such …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of interim applications filed in Second Appeal No. 132 of 2017 to bring on record the legal heirs of various deceased respondents. The court examined whether the heirs could be added as parties despite the passage of time and whether any procedural defaults such …
The Bombay High Court entertained a series of interim applications filed in Second Appeal No. 132 of 2017 to bring on record the legal heirs of various deceased respondents. For each application the Court examined the petition, condoned any delay in filing, set aside any abatement, and permitted …
The Bombay High Court dealt with a series of interim applications filed in a second appeal to bring on record the legal heirs of several deceased respondents. Each application sought permission to amend the petition to include the heirs, condone any filing delay, and set aside any abatement. The …
The petitioners challenged orders in revenue (RTS) proceedings concerning a mutation entry of land, arguing that the mutation entry does not determine title. They have a pending civil suit (RCS No.136 of 2019) seeking declaratory relief on the same land. The Court held that mutation entries are …
The petitioner, Anil Nivrutti Lokhande, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that a compromise decree dated 7 May 2024, executed in a regular civil appeal, was fraudulent and void, alleging it affected his substantive property rights. The court held that the remedy for such a claim lies in …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2021 challenging an order dated 06 July 2021 issued by the Hon'ble Minister, alleging that the order was passed without considering their written submissions dated 5 April 2021. The High Court, after granting ad interim relief, observed that the impugned …
The petitioners challenged orders in revenue (RTS) proceedings concerning a mutation entry of land, arguing that the mutation entry does not determine title. They have a pending civil suit (RCS No.136 of 2019) seeking declaratory relief on the same land. The Court held that mutation entries are …
Gangabai Shashikant Thakur and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging orders of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority dated 17 June 2022 and a notice dated 26 July 2022. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the State of Maharashtra was represented by …
Gangabai Shashikant Thakur and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging orders of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority dated 17 June 2022 and a notice dated 26 July 2022. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the State of Maharashtra was represented by …
The petitioners challenged a Sub‑Divisional Officer's order dated 18‑04‑2024 that allowed the private respondents to condone a 93‑year delay in contesting Mutation Entry No. 217, which was made in 1930. The private respondents claimed that the original mutation entry had infringed their right of way …
Petitioner Anish Mahavirprasad Goel filed a praecipe seeking correction of certain factual statements in the order dated 17‑02‑2026, specifically that a deed was described as a sale deed when it was in fact a gift deed dated 03‑12‑2007. The Court, after hearing counsel, agreed that the statements …
The appellant, Shyam Kabadkar, sought protection against the bank's attempt to take possession of a property, citing the pending SARFAESI proceedings and the welfare of his children. The bank argued that substantial recovery was due and it should be allowed to proceed with coercive steps. The court …
Dicet Creators & Innovators (India) Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15‑10‑2025 passed by the Collector, Mumbai, alleging lack of jurisdiction. The petitioners sought relief from coercive steps and directed the High Court to entertain the matter despite the availability of a …
Sunil Bajirao Pingale and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, through Advocate Vedant P. Babar, sought to withdraw the petition because the correct annexures and exhibits had not been appended. The respondents, …
The respondents, who were plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No. 2160 of 2024, agreed to withdraw the suit unconditionally. Upon receiving this instruction, the High Court noted the withdrawal and ordered that the appeal filed by the appellants (M/s. Arihant Associates & Ors.) from Order No. 204 of …
Sanober Shaikh filed an appeal against Order No. 214 of 2026 in the High Court of Bombay. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant informed the court that she no longer wishes to press the appeal but wants to keep her rights open to file any further application in the underlying suit. The court …
The applicants filed Interim Application No. 10223 of 2022 and Interim Application No. 766 of 2019 in the course of Second Appeal No. 496 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court. They sought the Court's permission to withdraw these interim applications. The learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. …
The plaintiffs claimed ownership of a 3‑R parcel of land in Pune based on a registered sale deed dated 18‑06‑1987 and sought declaration, injunction and possession against the defendants, who alleged a later sale deed dated 09‑02‑1999 was valid. The trial court dismissed the suit for non‑compliance …
The applicants filed Interim Application No. 10223 of 2022 and Interim Application No. 766 of 2019 in the course of Second Appeal No. 496 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court. They sought the Court's permission to withdraw these interim applications. The learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging certain orders of the State of Maharashtra. The High Court observed that the substantive rights of the parties are currently being contested in an eviction proceeding (Suit No. 132 of 2023) before the Small Causes Court, which references the same …
Moshin Salim Chunawala, a construction businessman, claimed that police protection granted after underworld threats was free of charge. The State of Maharashtra later issued bills and a demand notice under Section 174 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code to recover alleged protection fees. Chunawala …
The appellant, Ram Suresh Sevla Prasad Yadav, appealed an ad‑interim order of the trial court that had been issued following a show‑cause notice from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The appeal concerned the trial court’s handling of the notice of motion and the pending intervention by a …
The appellant, Hajarilal Raj Kishore Yadav, challenged an ad‑interim order of the trial court that had been issued following a show‑cause notice and speaking order from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The appeal sought relief from the interim directives and questioned the trial court’s …
The appellant, Tahira Ramzan Ali Mohammed Yaqoob, challenged an ad‑interim order issued by the trial court following a show‑cause notice and speaking order from the Designated Officer of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The appellant sought relief against coercive steps being taken …
The appellant, Abdul Sattar Bipat Khan, appealed an ad‑interim order issued by the trial court in a suit against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The trial court had acted on a show‑cause notice issued by the Corporation’s Designated Officer. The appellate court examined whether the …
The petitioners challenged orders dated 31 August 1998 and 5 April 1999 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Nashik Division, on the ground that they were passed without any hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The High Court found the claim of lack of hearing undisputed and, without …
The Ballaleshwar Co-operative Housing Society filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 14‑06‑2022 that had not taken into account the architect’s certificate. The Court observed that, as per its earlier order of 25‑09‑2023, the certificate should have been considered by the Competent …
The petitioner filed a writ petition and a praecipe was filed on 17 January 2026 seeking clarification of the order dated 13 January 2026. The court observed that the name of the advocate, Mr. Manish S. Kelkar, was incorrectly recorded in the appearance clause and in paragraph references, listing …
The appellant, an 82‑year‑old litigant, filed Interim Application No.11303 of 2025 seeking an expedited hearing of a Second Appeal dated 2018, citing his advanced age and medical condition. The applicant was represented by Mr. Ronak M. Utagikar, assisted by Mr. Tejas D. Deshmukh. The Court examined …
The appellants, Surinder Kaur J. Chhabara and Anr., appealed an order dated 2025 relating to an interim application (Exhibit ‘5’) in Special Civil Suit No.1195 of 2024, which had been transferred among several Joint Civil Judges in Pune. The trial court had not yet determined the application, and …
In an appeal before the Bombay High Court, the appellants (Mulund Nemvihar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd & Anr.) sought correction of the order dated 08.01.2026. By mutual consent, the court was directed to replace the word "Defendants" with "Appellants" in paragraph 4 and to insert a sentence in …
The petitioner filed a praecipe seeking correction of clerical errors in the order dated 08.01.2026. The Court examined the appearance clause and identified that it should read “Mr. Abhijit B. Kadam, Advocate i/by Uday B. Nighot and Ms. Akanksha Gond for Petitioner.” It also noted that the date …
