Created by Fuzzy Cloud

MUNIR

74 judgments · newest first · showing 1–74

SMT VIMLA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Vimla Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 34945 of 2026) in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order passed by the Collector. The petition sought relief against the Collector's decision, alleging that it was illegal or arbitrary. The Court examined the petitioner's claim and found it …

B-PACS SOCIETY LTD. AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, B-Pacs Society Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that essential facts required for the petition could not be pleaded. …

MANJU KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

Manju Kumar filed a writ petition challenging the actions of the Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow, and the Union of India. The officer issued a notice on 07.07.2026, to which the petitioner responded on 05.09.2026. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, directed the Regional …

SANDEEP KUMAR GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sandeep Kumar Gupta and another, filed a writ petition challenging an enquiry report submitted by the District Magistrate, Gorakhpur, which investigated eleven allegations against them and found none established. The petitioners sought to object to the report, arguing that it was …

ADESH KUAMRversusUNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Adesh Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition, stating that certain documents could not be annexed and essential facts were not pleaded. The court considered the request and, …

AJAY KUMAR GUPTA AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners were evicted from shops under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 and have filed multiple appeals before the Additional District Magistrate, Ballia. The High Court directed that these appeals be heard expeditiously with two hearing dates each week and …

RAJESH YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajesh Yadav, was stranded in Saudi Arabia after his Indian passport expired on 18 September 2026 and filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the passport authority to reissue his passport. The High Court held that it could not issue a direct order for reissue under the …

VAIBHAV SOODversusSMT. SWATI SOOD

The appellant, Vaibhav Sood, filed a first appeal but later informed the court that he no longer wishes to prosecute the appeal and sought leave to withdraw it. The appellant's counsel, Hitesh Pachori, made the request before the bench of Hon'ble J.J. Munir and Hon'ble Indrajeet Shukla. The court …

SMT SHALINI TOMARversusASHWANI KUMAR

The appellant, Smt. Shalini Tomar, filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 619 of 2024) against Ashwani Kumar. The appellant later filed a civil miscellaneous withdrawal application (No. 3 of 2026) seeking to withdraw the appeal. The High Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the withdrawal application. …

SMT. SHUBHI YADAVversusJITENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHER

Smt. Shubhi Yadav filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 591 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. Her counsel, Meraj Ahmad Khan, submitted an application to withdraw the appeal. The judges, J.J. Munir and Indrajeet Shukla, accepted the withdrawal request. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal …

AJAY KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Registrar of Tehsil Soraon to decide an application dated 11‑09‑2026 and to refrain from interfering with their peaceful possession of land comprising Gata Nos. 294 and 202 in …

ARSHAD ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arshad Ali, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to protect his life and property from alleged political harassment by ruling party elements. The petition was dismissed because the prayer was vague and could not be granted on that …

SHIV SARAN SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shiv Saran Singh, was issued a show‑cause notice by the Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow, for allegedly suppressing information about a pending criminal case (Crime No. 24 of 2013) in his passport application. The petitioner contended that the case was false, that the investigating …

GAURAV CHAUDHARYversusUNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gaurav Chaudhary, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a notice dated 07.04.2026 issued by the Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow. The petition sought relief against the annexation of evidence and the procedural steps prescribed by the officer. The Court …

SMT BHAWAR KALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Bhawar Kali, sought a compensation of Rs.5,00,000 under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna, 2020 for the death of her son, Ram Kumar. The District Magistrate, Baghpat, rejected the claim with a terse order in Hindi that provided no reasons. The court held that any …

SHAMSHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner was served a notice to remove illegal constructions encroaching a public road in Bareilly, covering 180 square feet. The petitioner filed a reply with the Executive Engineer. The High Court directed that the reply be placed before the Nagar Ayukta, who should consider the matter and …

ZULFIKAR ALIversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition against the State of U.P. and a bank, seeking relief. The High Court ordered the petitioner to deposit a bank draft of Rs. 7,50,000 in favour of the respondent bank by 04‑08‑2026 and to produce proof of deposit. The petitioner failed to appear, sought …

VINOD KUMAR JOSHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners Vinod Kumar Joshi and another filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21 September 2026 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tajatalab, District Varanasi, which had held an application filed by respondent No. 6 under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and …

AASIFversusUP POWER CORPORATION LTD AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aasif, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but the accompanying affidavit was found to be defective. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh petition with a correct affidavit. The Court considered the procedural defect …

SHREE GANESH AGRO INDUSTRIESversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shree Ganesh Agro Industries, the petitioner, challenged a notice issued by IDBI Bank under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act and the subsequent order rejecting its representation under Section 13(3‑A). The bank had also issued a notice under Section 13(4) and claimed the loan had become a …

M/S AGNIHOTRI MOTOR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, M/s. Agnihotri Motor and another, filed Writ No. 38194 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought to withdraw the petition, referencing an earlier writ petition (Writ No. 11830 of 2026). The court accepted the withdrawal request. …

SAKIRversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sakir, challenged the sale and impending dispossession of his house by the Bank of India after the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) had ordered a stay on confirming the sale. Despite the DRT’s interim order, the bank sold the property and the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate directed possession …

M/S SHARDA METALS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

M/s Sharda Metals and others filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 02‑09‑2026 passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Aligarh under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioners contended that they were aggrieved by a possession notice issued under Section …

SMT. JYOTI JHANJIversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Jyoti Jhanji, sought relief from a home loan recovery proceeding initiated by Canara Bank. The bank stipulated that if the petitioner deposited the overdue amount of Rs.1,62,000 before the auction date of 28 September 2026, the loan would be regularized. The court ordered that …

VIKRAM SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Vikram Sharma applied for a re‑issue of his passport but the Regional Passport Officer raised objections on the ground that two criminal matters—one under the IPC and SC/ST Act and another under the Public Gambling Act—were pending and allegedly suppressed. Sharma submitted affidavits claiming …

PRAKASH CHANDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The District Magistrate/District Election Officer of Prayagraj shifted polling stations 145‑147 from Prathmik Vidyalay Kolhuwa to Prathmik Vidyalay Jethupur Khas by an order dated 18‑03‑2021, acting on directions issued in response to a representation filed by three Gram Sabha members. The …

PREMILA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

Premila Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Azamgarh to act on a representation dated 31 July 2026. The Court examined whether a petition for the mere decision of a non‑statutory representation is maintainable. It …

JITENDRA NAGARversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jitendra Nagar, filed a writ petition seeking a directive to State authorities (respondents 2‑5) to act on applications dated 02‑04‑2026 and 27‑07‑2026, and also sought relief against respondent 6 for alleged trespass into his house. The Court observed that the grievance stems from a …

LALLU RAMversusSHIV KUMARI DEVI

Lallu Ram appealed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 challenging a Family Court order that set aside an ex‑parte divorce decree dated 17‑12‑1990. The decree had been obtained after the respondent, Shiv Kumari Devi, failed to appear despite service of summons deemed sufficient. The …

VIJAY NARAYAN RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Vijay Narayan Ram filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and Prayagraj Development Authority to pay fair compensation with interest under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for 303 sq. yd. …

SANJAY KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Singh, challenged the suspension of his contract issued by the Divisional Food Controller, Azamgarh Division, on 21 August 2026. The District Magistrate/Collector of Gorakhpur issued a revised character certificate on 4 September 2026. The High Court examined whether the …

M/S CHAURASIYA KHAN VIKRAITAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/s Chaurasiya Khan Vikraita, challenged the suspension of its fertilizer licence after 60 bags of DAP were seized, allegedly shipped by an unlicensed consigner under an invoice in the petitioner's name. The High Court held that the suspension should be stayed pending a hearing, …

AKRAM KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Akram Khan, filed a writ petition seeking protection for his daughter, a minor born on 10 July 2009, who alleged that her father forced her to marry against her will and that she feared for her life. The prosecutrix, a matriculate, testified before a Judicial Magistrate that she …

ABHISHEK BANSALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Abhishek Bansal, filed a writ petition seeking quashment of FIR No. 0125 of 2024, which alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The dispute was matrimonial, involving the petitioner (husband) and respondent No.4 (wife), and the …

SATSANG KUMAR AND 178 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 16 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. After investigation, a charge-sheet was filed in the trial court, rendering the petition apparently infructuous. The petitioners, through their counsel, requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, …

ABHISHEK BANSAL AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quashal of an FIR (Case Crime No. 0125 of 2024) registered under Sections 85, 115, 352, 351, 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The High Court noted that the same …

AKHILESH AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Akhilesh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief. After a final report was filed, the petitioners, through counsel, requested to withdraw the petition. The Court accepted the prayer, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, and granted liberty to file a fresh …

ASHOK KUMARversusDISTRICT JUDGE, DISTRICT BIJNOR AND ANOTHER

Ashok Kumar obtained an acquittal from the District Judge, Bijnor, and subsequently received a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the police to obtain a passport. He filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 25436 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking further relief. The petitioners, …

SMT SIMRAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Simran and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 25594 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The Court accepted the prayer and ordered the petition dismissed as …

ABHINAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Abhinav, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8016 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. After the charge sheet was submitted in the underlying criminal case, the petitioner's counsel, Vivek Kumar Yadav, moved the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The Court …

DR. MATILI RAJ AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Dr. Matili Raj and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 10234 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three other respondents. The petition was presented before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice J.J. Munir and …

SAURABH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Saurabh Kumar and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quash of an FIR alleging that they defrauded an informant of Rs. 22 lakh by promising a police Sub‑Inspector post in Madhya Pradesh and providing a forged selection list. The petitioners contended that the …

AMAN MINORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a 17‑year‑old minor, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of the FIR alleging that he had taken away the prosecutrix, also a minor, by blandishment and attempted to molest her. The FIR described that the prosecutrix was taken away almost by force and that …

OSAMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Osama, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashment of an FIR dated 22 April 2026 that alleged his involvement in an assault on an informant. The FIR, registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, described a severe assault resulting …

VINOD SINGH @ VINOD KUMAR SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought interference with a First Information Report (FIR) that alleged they obstructed a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate and government officials during a public road construction, using criminal force and brickbatting police and revenue officers. The FIR described a pandemonium that …

BABLU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bablu Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashment of FIR No. 0015 of 2026 dated 26-04-2026, which alleged rape, assault, and fraudulent withdrawal of Rs.2,500 from the victim's fiancé's bank account. The FIR listed offences under Sections …

SATYAM GIRI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of locals, were named in an FIR after a Scorpio car hit a bicycle ridden by a 15‑year‑old boy and a parked car. In protest, the petitioners organized a blockade of the Mau‑Azamgarh Highway from 3:30 pm to 6:30 pm, causing traffic jams and preventing ambulances from reaching …

SMT MAMTA DWIVEDI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, both adults, married each other under Hindu rites on 16-12-2025. Their families objected and the first petitioner's brother filed an FIR (Crime No. 248 of 2025) under Section 87 of the BNS alleging that the second petitioner had taken away the first petitioner by blandishment. The …

NIKHIL SINGH ALIAS NIKHIL PRATAPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nikhil Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the First Information Report (FIR) filed against him. During the pendency of the petition, the police submitted a final report, indicating the closure of the investigation. The petitioner sought to withdraw the …

VISHAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners sought quash of an FIR dated 10‑08‑2025 filed under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3) BNS and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kanpur Dehat. The State expressed no …

SMT. DEEPA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, both adults, married under Hindu rites on 18 March 2026 and live together as husband and wife. The petitioner’s grandmother objected and lodged an FIR under Section 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging kidnapping. The petitioners contended that the FIR was an abuse of process …

JITENDER AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an FIR registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 131 and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that the alleged assault on the informant's sons was not substantiated. The FIR described an incident on 1 …

TAUFIQ AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, seven accused persons, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of the FIR alleging they assaulted Mursad Ali to deter his testimony in other cases. The FIR details the assault with sticks and resulting internal injuries, and a medico‑legal report confirms …

RASHIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rashid, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of the FIR alleging his involvement in a violent assault that resulted in injuries to four persons and the death of Abdul Rauf. The assault involved sticks and sharp-edged weapons, causing abrasions, contusions, incised …

GAJENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gajendra Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashment of an FIR dated 28 January 2026, which alleged his involvement in a narcotics offence under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act, based on statements of co‑accused who claimed they would deliver 113 kg of …

KASIM KHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kasim Khan and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 challenging the registration of an FIR alleging that they were involved in negotiating a contract killing. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others, opposed the petition. The …

SANJU @ SANJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sanju alias Sanjay Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 9281 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State was represented by Additional Government Advocate Anil Kumar Mishra. The …

SANDHYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sandhya, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR that alleged she, along with associates, defrauded an informant of Rs. 1,50,000 by promising doubled returns through cryptocurrency investments and issuing a fake passbook. The petitioner contended that …

SURAJ JUMANI @ SURAJ AMARLAL @ AMARLAL SURAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Suraj Jumani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking quash of FIR dated 20-12-2025 (Crime No. 303 of 2025) alleging cheating in a share‑broker scheme. The FIR alleges that the petitioner induced an informant to invest Rs. 22 lakh by claiming affiliation …

SUNITA @ SONI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Sunita alias Soni and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, alleging that they were assaulted by the accused and that the investigation was inadequate. The FIR described an assault on the informant's mother with an iron rod, …

KULDEEP GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Kuldeep Gupta and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Ravindra Prakash Srivastava, moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn because certain documents could not be annexed and essential facts could not be pleaded. …

MANORMA GUPTA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Manorma Gupta and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition but later moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn because certain documents could not be annexed and essential facts could not be pleaded. The Court accepted the prayer, dismissed the petition as withdrawn …

DAULI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Dauli and her husband, are adults who married on 16 January 2026. The father of the first petitioner, a respondent, filed an FIR on 28 October 2025 under Section 87 of the B.N.S. Act, 2023, alleging that the husband had abducted his daughter. The petitioners contended that the FIR …

PARAM HANS GUPTAversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Param Hans Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The Court, after hearing counsel, directed the investigating officer to conclude the investigation against the petitioner and to inform the Court of the outcome. The matter was listed for …

ANAND PRAKASH SINGH @ ANAND SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 20 June 2025 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code arising from a matrimonial dispute. The High Court referred the matter to the Mediation Centre, where the parties eventually entered …

AMIR ALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Amir Ali and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 3763 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners and the petitioners themselves were absent. The State was represented by Additional …

SANTOO @ SAJIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Santoo alias Sajid, was convicted and sentenced by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act in Sessions Trial No. 164 of 2016. He filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 16679 of 2019) before the Allahabad High Court. The High Court noted that the Sessions Judge and …

MAHESH PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mahesh Pal Singh, convicted of offences under Sections 302, 34 and 120B of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, had filed a bail application (No. 24460 of 2021) before the High Court of Allahabad. The District Judge submitted a compliance report and an affidavit from the Senior Superintendent …

SANJAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sanjay, filed a bail application in the Allahabad High Court. The court examined a report from the Superintendent of Police showing that the Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court in Hapur had acquitted the applicant in Sessions Trial No. 32 of 2017, which involved offences under …

SMT. REKHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Smt. Rekna, convicted in Sessions Trial No. 149 of 2017 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 307, 302/149 and 120B of the IPC, applied for bail. The High Court considered reports from the District Judge and Superintendent of Police. A supervening event occurred, rendering the bail application moot. …

GUDDU AGNIOHOTRI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court examined a criminal appeal filed by Guddu Agnihotri and Abdulla against the State of U.P. After a report and death certificate confirmed that Guddu Agnihotri had died on 6 November 2002, the court also noted that Abdulla, the second appellant, was already dead, leading to a petition …

SALAUDDIN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition on 25 November seeking relief, but the court did not take up the matter for an extended period. During this delay, the petitioners faced intense pressure from the police, which compelled them to surrender and apply for bail. The …