Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
133 judgments · newest first · showing 1–133
The applicant, Komal Sunil More, was convicted by a Special Judge in Pune for offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, receiving a ten‑year rigorous imprisonment for the principal charge and lesser terms for other offences. She filed an interim application …
The Special Judge convicted Sonu Ananta Jadhav and co‑accused under IPC §§ 394, 506(2) read with § 34 and MCOC Act §§ 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(4), sentencing Jadhav to five years rigorous imprisonment on each count and a two‑year simple imprisonment, together with a total fine of Rs 15,30,000. Jadhav has …
The petition challenged an order dated 15 June 2026 of the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) directing revenue authorities to prohibit transfer of land under Section 36A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and to record a mutation. The Additional Collector, relying on the NCST order, …
The petitioners sought an order directing the Civil Judge to exhibit a sub‑lease dated 2 October 1982, which the judge had refused to mark. The petitioners argued that they should be allowed to tender the document in evidence and have its evidentiary value considered later. The Court held that a …
The petitioners, who are defendants in a suit for conveyance of land, challenged a civil judge's order rejecting their application to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. They argued that the area of land for which the plaintiff society sought unilateral deemed conveyance (647.21 …
The petitioners challenged a Civil Judge's order allowing the amendment of a plaint to correct the description of the suit property, alleging that the plaintiffs had knowingly misrepresented the change in survey and Hissa numbers since 2010 and thus approached the court with unclean hands. The …
Sarvapriya Leasing Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging an order that seemingly barred further proceedings. The petitioner sought to amend the plaint to implead additional parties and raise new grounds of challenge against subsequent transactions. The Court initially expressed reluctance to …
Golden Line Studios Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 22 January 2026 issued by the Estate Officer under Section 5(1) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971. The petitioner argued that after a personal hearing on 26 December 2018, no further …
The petitioners, Sainath Sanjay Bodkhe and Suman Malhari Mohite, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Sub Divisional Officer. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, contended that the order was final. The Court examined the Government Resolution dated 12 February 2019, …
The petitioners, Sunil Jaynarayan Shrivastav and another, filed a writ petition challenging the delay in issuance of notices by the Assistant Charity Commissioner after a remand order dated 23 July 2025. The State's Additional Government Pleader highlighted that despite repeated listings, the …
The petitioner, Rahul Surendra Kamat, challenged an order that allowed the withdrawal of an application filed under Section 36 of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. He alleged that the trustees of the Bombay Gograss Bhiksha Society had created third‑party rights in the trust property before the …
The applicants, Lordu Papi Gade Reddy and Dattkumar Bhaskar Patil, filed an interim application seeking correction of a prior order dated 27 July 2026. The order concerned the status of the substantive sentence imposed by a Special Judge in Special Case No.100381 of 2014, which arose from a POCSO …
M/s Baader Schulz Laboratories, a partnership firm, filed Writ Petition No. 5308 of 2026 against FDC International NV/SA. The petitioner, through Senior Advocate Nitin Thakkar, sought leave to withdraw the petition and retain the liberty to raise the same grounds in a future proceeding. The Court …
The applicant, SD SVP Nagar Redevelopment Pvt Ltd, sought condonation of a 31‑day delay in filing a second appeal against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal that stayed a prior order of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority. The applicant argued that the delay was due to the …
The petitioner, a single mother belonging to the Dhangar Nomadic Tribe, applied for admission of her daughter Arohee under the Right to Education (RTE) quota. The Taluka Level Scrutiny Committee rejected the application because the father’s caste certificate was not produced, despite the mother’s …
The appellant, Seema Promoters and Builders Pvt Ltd, appealed against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal directing it to refund the full consideration paid by the allottees for two shops, together with interest. The allottees had entered into sale agreements in June 2017, …
In a second appeal (No. 310 of 2026) filed by Madhukar Chindhu Waje and others against Kamal Bandu Sathe, the applicants sought an interim order to prevent any transfer, alienation, or creation of third‑party interest in the suit property pending the final disposal of the appeal. The court noted …
The petitioners, Sainath Sanjay Bodkhe, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Civil Judge dated 22 May 2026 which refused to direct the plaintiff, Mak Auto Sales, to pay court fees under the correct designated head and instead allowed the plaint to proceed. The petitioners argued that …
The petitioners, a charitable trust and its trustees, sought to amend their plaint to include recent municipal notices and objections concerning alleged unauthorised construction by the defendant on the trust's property. The City Civil Court had partially allowed the amendment but rejected …
Anil Dagdu Phale filed Writ Petition No. 8279 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court against Dnyandev Dattatray Patil. The petitioner's counsel, Ketan A. Dhavle, sought leave of the Court to withdraw the petition and to be permitted to file a suitable application before the trial court. The Court examined …
Petitioners Rajendra M. Jain and others filed Writ Petition No. 6750 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court challenging an action of the respondent Sulochana S. More. The petition was pending before Justice N.J. Jamadar. The petitioners, through counsel Anuj Tiwari, applied for leave to withdraw the …
The applicant, Alex Peter Dabre, filed a civil revision seeking the rejection of a plaint on the grounds of under‑valuation of the suit claim and non‑payment of requisite court fees under Order VII Rule 11(b) and (c) of the CPC. The trial court had dismissed the applicant’s application, holding the …
Vimleshwar Hotels and Resorts Pvt Ltd filed Writ Petition No. 8158 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court seeking leave to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to obtain appropriate orders in First Appeal No. 831 of 2017, which challenges the judgment and decree in SCS No. 22 of 2012. The …
The applicant, Pushkaraj Jaywant Gurav, filed Civil Revision Application No.176 of 2025 which was dismissed by the Registrar, Judicial I on 4 November 2025 for failure to remove office objections. The applicant later filed an interim application seeking to set aside that dismissal, albeit after a …
The Bombay High Court considered an interim application filed by Ranu Sherali Shaikh, who had been convicted under the Passport (Entry into India) Rules, 1950 for contravening Rule 3(a) and sentenced to six months’ imprisonment and a fine of Rs 1,000. The applicant, having paid the fine, sought …
The appellant, Anthony Ignatius Fernandes, filed a criminal appeal (No. 395 of 2026) against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the appellant's counsel sought to submit the appellant's death certificate. The court granted leave, accepted the death certificate showing the appellant …
The applicant, Sachin Alias Lambu Hanumant Rajeya, was ordered on 11 November 2025 to be enlarged on bail with a personal bond of Rs.15,000 and a surety, and his substantive sentence was suspended because he had already served 7 years and 9 months of imprisonment. More than six months elapsed and …
The petition under Article 227 challenged the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s order affirming the District Commission’s condonation of a 1192‑day delay in filing a consumer complaint against Godrej Projects Development Ltd. The complainants had booked a flat, paid part consideration, …
The petitioner, Atul Vijay Madan, challenged a March 30, 2026 order of the Nashik Collector that cancelled his induction as a partner in a licensed establishment and restored the licence to the original licencee. He appealed the order to the Commissioner of State Excise (Respondent No.2) on April 2, …
The appellants, Leena B. Kadlag and Siddharth Arvind Waghmare, appealed against their conviction under Sections 120B and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and a one‑year simple imprisonment with a fine. They filed an interim application seeking suspension of the sentence pending the disposal of the …
The High Court admitted two criminal appeals filed by Akhilesh Harshal Pandey and Anoop Roy against the Central Bureau of Investigation. The appellants sought suspension of their imprisonment sentences imposed by a Special Judge in CBI Special Cases No.35 of 2011 and No.36 of 2012, arguing parity …
The High Court admitted two criminal appeals filed by Akhilesh Harshal Pandey and Anoop Roy against the Central Bureau of Investigation. Both appellants sought relief similar to that granted to a co-accused, Satish Krishna Pujari, whose imprisonment sentence was suspended pending appeal. The Court …
The High Court admitted appeals by Akhilesh Harshal Pandey and Anoop Roy against convictions in CBI Special Cases No.35 of 2011 and No.36 of 2012, where a Special Judge had imposed imprisonment. Both appellants filed interim applications seeking suspension of their sentences and bail. Noting a …
The petitioner, Diana Agnelo Colaco, filed a writ petition seeking permanent possession of a flat in Keshav Apartment. The High Court held that such a relief cannot be granted under its writ jurisdiction. The court directed that the petitioner must pursue her claim either before a civil court or …
Ashok M Khandekar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. During hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition and to raise the same issue before the appropriate authority later. The Court, after hearing the …
The appellants, legal heirs of the deceased Madni Rashida S Abbas, appealed a decree that declared the respondent, Leena Francis D’Souza, as owner of certain premises and ordered the appellants to deliver vacant possession and pay monthly compensation. The trial court had found that the respondent’s …
The appellants, legal heirs of the deceased Madni Rashida S Abbas, appealed a decree that declared the respondent, Leena Francis D’Souza, as owner of certain premises and ordered the appellants to deliver vacant possession and pay monthly compensation. The trial court had found that the respondent’s …
The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) sought revision of a Civil Judge's order that rejected its application to dismiss a suit filed by Shivam Govendra Singh challenging two notices issued under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The plaintiff alleged the …
The applicants filed an interim application seeking condonation of an 11‑day delay in filing an appeal against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dated 21 November 2025. The court noted that the notice was served on Respondent No.2 and that Respondent No.2 did not appear. The …
The High Court of Bombay heard counsel for Wheelabrator Alloy Castings Ltd. (appellant) and Mrs. Nirmala Khandelwal & ors. (respondents). Both sides jointly submitted that they were exploring an amicable settlement. The court, at the joint request of counsel, adjourned the matter to 12 August 2026. …
The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) sought revision of a Civil Judge's order that rejected its application to dismiss a suit filed by Shivam Govendra Singh challenging two notices issued under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The plaintiff alleged the …
The Bombay High Court, acting suo moto, reviewed the minutes of its order dated 17 June 2026. It identified a clerical mistake in clause (viii) of the operative part where the term "six months" was used. The Court directed that this phrase be corrected to read "60 days". No other part of the order …
The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside orders of the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority that had dismissed complaints by homebuyers against Esque Finmark and Macrotech, directing the developers to execute sale agreements and deliver possession. The developers argued they …
The appellant, Lata Dadabhau Ponde, claimed possession of a shop premises based on a leave and licence agreement executed with Pannadevi Shyamsunder Khandelwal, partner of the lessee M/s. Poorna Warehousing Corporation, for a three‑year term starting 1 October 2001. The licence term had expired, yet …
The appellant, originally Defendant No.1, claimed continued possession of a shop premises based on a leave and licence agreement executed with the lessee's partner, which was set for three years starting 1 October 2001. The licence term had unequivocally expired, and the appellant persisted in …
The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside orders of the MAHARERA that dismissed complaints by homebuyers against Macrotech Developers Ltd. and Esque Finmark Pvt. Ltd., directing execution of sale agreements and delivery of possession. The appellants argued they were improperly made …
Satish Krishna Pujari appealed against his conviction in CBI Special Cases 35/2011 and 36/2012, where he was found guilty of several IPC offences and sentenced to up to three years imprisonment. He sought suspension of the substantive sentence pending final disposal of the appeal, arguing that he …
JSW Steel Coated Product Ltd. filed a civil revision application against John Cockerill India Ltd. The applicant's counsel informed the court that the underlying suit had been dismissed as withdrawn by the trial court, rendering the revision application moot. The High Court accepted this submission …
Manoj Dattatray Mestry filed two writ petitions (Nos. 5918 and 5929 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioner was represented by Harshal Hasmukh Savla and Pintu Singh. The Court noted that the execution petitions arising from these writs required …
The petitioners filed a civil suit seeking specific performance of a sale deed and an interim injunction concerning a disputed immovable property. During the suit, the police prompted an Executive Magistrate to act under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, leading to a criminal revision …
The applicant, Snehali Sachin Panchal, filed an application before the High Court seeking bail. The applicant's counsel subsequently requested leave to withdraw the application. The Court entertained the request and directed that if the applicant appears before the Special Judge, any bail …
The petition challenged a civil judge’s order dismissing an application to file a counter‑claim in a 2014 partition suit. The petitioner sought to bring additional joint family properties into the common hotchpot by filing the counter‑claim after the plaintiff’s affidavit and commencement of …
The petitioners, Kamal Kedu Khare and another, alleged that they were not present before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) and that their signatures on consent terms were forged, yet the MRT issued an order on 6 February 2024. They challenged this order through a writ petition in the Bombay …
The respondents, legal heirs of the deceased Balu Vithu More, sued to declare ownership of a suit property, alleging that the appellant had fabricated a will to claim title. The trial court declared the respondents as owners, ordered the appellant to deliver vacant possession, and revoked the …
Bhaurao Shankar Khute, a peon at Bhonsla Military College, was dismissed in 2019 for absenteeism, temporary misappropriation of college funds, and alleged corruption involving parents' money. He appealed the dismissal to the University Tribunal, which upheld the penalty, finding the enquiry fair, …
The petitioners challenged a Civil Judge's order that the amendment of the plaint be heard before the application to reject the plaint. The High Court examined the precedents cited by both sides, particularly Pramod s/o Manoharrao Konge v. Shantaram Dhok and Bharat Travellers v. Sumitrabai Buty, …
The petitioners, Polyster Realtors Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay against the State of Maharashtra and others. The Court heard counsel for both sides and examined the report of the City Civil Court. The matter concerned the disposal of a chamber summons. The Court …
The petitioner, Jitesh Dudhale, challenged an order dated 11 March 2026 of the Maintenance Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. He had filed an appeal before the Appellate Senior Citizen Tribunal on 29 March 2026, but the Tribunal refused to register …
The applicants, Vishnukumar Bansal and another, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Bombay. The underlying criminal complaint was subsequently withdrawn by the complainant. The applicants then sought leave from the Court to withdraw their application in view of the withdrawn …
The petitioners, Hi Rock Construction Company, challenged orders of the City Civil Court, Mazgaon, which had refused to return summary suit plaints filed by the respondents alleging fraud and non‑payment of advances. The petitioners argued that the Court lacked jurisdiction because the partnership …
The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority directed Shri Sai Vishram Co‑operative Housing Society and its promoters to pay interest under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA). The Society appealed to the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, which …
The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority directed Shri Sai Vishram Co‑operative Housing Society and its promoters to pay interest under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) and to make a pre‑deposit under the proviso to Section 43(5). The Society …
M/s Amit Enterprises Housing Ltd appealed against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal directing it to deposit the full amount ordered by the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority. The appellant argued that any interest payable under Section 18 of the Real Estate …
The petitioners challenged a February 24, 2026 order of the Civil Judge, Pune, which appointed a Court Commissioner to measure and demarcate the disputed properties in an injunction suit. They argued that the suit sought only an injunction and did not request removal of encroachment or possession, …
The applicants, Shri Sai Vishram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and others, filed interim applications seeking condonation of a 20‑day delay in filing second appeals against orders of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal. The delay arose because the appellants had earlier filed writ …
Manoj Pandhurang Waghavekar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an unspecified order of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later moved the court seeking leave to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file an appropriate proceeding later. The Court, after …
The petitioner, a claimant in an arbitration, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a District Judge's order that extended the sole arbitrator's mandate by six months under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner alleged bias after an unknown lady was …
The plaintiffs filed a suit seeking a declaration that a 2005 development agreement and a subsequent 2007 agreement were cancelled due to the defendant's breach and fraudulent transfer of the suit property. The trial court declared both agreements void ab initio and ordered possession to be …
The petitioner, accused of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, was denied the opportunity to cross‑examine the complainant after he and his counsel failed to appear in court on 7 February 2024. He applied to set aside the "no‑cross" order, arguing genuine reasons for his …
The co‑owners of a building in Malad filed suits claiming the defendants were trespassers occupying flats on a purported licence basis, while the defendants contended that a sale agreement dated 15‑Feb‑2013 transferred title. The plaintiffs moved to dismiss the suits on the ground that the …
The co‑owners of a building in Malad, Mumbai (the respondents) sued the defendants for possession of flats, alleging the defendants were trespassers who occupied the flats as licencees without a valid leave‑and‑licence agreement. The defendants contended that a sale agreement dated 15 February 2013, …
The petitioner challenged an order of the City Civil Court that directed the pending Notices of Motion (Nos. 3862/2025, 343/2026, 344/2026 and 345/2026) be kept on record and that the main execution petition be postponed until those motions are decided. The Notices of Motion were filed by former …
CCI Projects Private Ltd filed a review petition challenging the High Court's order of 24 November 2025, which had upheld a City Civil Court order rejecting the petitioner's motion to dismiss the plaint for non‑compliance with the mandatory pre‑institution mediation provision under Section 12A of …
The petitioner's son, Pratik, was found dead on railway tracks in September 2010, and the petitioner filed a private complaint alleging that the accused, including his classmates, a teacher, the principal and a hostel supervisor, had murdered him and staged a railway accident. After proceedings, the …
The applicants, who are also defendants in a suit concerning the Rutton Manor building in Colaba, challenged a City Civil Court order that dismissed their motion to reject the plaint on the ground of exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Small Causes. The dispute centered on whether the suit, which …
The petitioners, Baban Dagadu Kurandale and others, filed a contempt petition in the High Court of Bombay. Subsequently, on their counsel’s instructions, they submitted a pursis seeking withdrawal of the contempt petition. The court recorded the withdrawal on the record. Accordingly, the court …
The appellants, a partnership promoting the "Gloria" project, were ordered by the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal to refund Rs.15,00,000 with interest to the allottee, Neha Khamkar, after finding that a partner, Babaji Jadhav, had authority to bind the partnership and had issued a …
The appellants, a partnership and its partners, were ordered by the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal to refund Rs.15,00,000 with interest to an allottee who had paid Rs.7,50,000 for a 600 sq ft unit in the "Gloria" project. The allottee alleged that a partner, Babaji Jadhav, received the …
The petitioners challenged a district court order that stayed the execution of an arbitral award, subject to the petitioners depositing the full award amount with interest. The award, arising from a Section 34 application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, required the petitioners to …
The appeal challenges a judgment dismissing a 2017 application under Order XXI Rule 58 of the CPC, wherein the appellants argued that the deceased judgment debtor owned only a one‑quarter share in the attached properties and thus the attachment was improper. The lower courts had already rejected …
Larsen & Toubro Ltd Realty Division and the respondents, Sudhir Balram Dole and Gauri Dole, reached an amicable settlement and executed consent terms. Both parties appeared before the court, admitted the contents of the consent terms, and affirmed that the settlement was voluntary and free of …
The petitioners filed writ petitions alleging that the Grievance Redressal Committee failed to hear complaints they lodged in 2024 and 2025. They sought a court directive compelling the Committee to consider their grievances promptly. The Court examined the limited nature of the grievance and found …
The petitioners filed writ petitions alleging that the Grievance Redressal Committee failed to hear complaints they lodged in 2024 and 2025. They sought a court directive compelling the Committee to consider their grievances promptly. The Court examined the limited nature of the grievance and found …
The petitioners filed writ petitions alleging that the Grievance Redressal Committee failed to hear complaints they lodged in 2024 and 2025. They sought a court directive compelling the Committee to consider their grievances promptly. The Court examined the limited nature of the grievance and found …
The petitioner, Mikhail Kantroo, challenged an order dated 20 February 2026 passed by the Maintenance Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, which directed him to deliver possession of premises to a senior citizen respondent. The Court noted a precedent …
M/s Vishwashakti Construction filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 4802 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The learned counsel made the application before a single judge. The Court granted the …
The petitioners, Irfan Jalal Shaikh and others, filed a writ petition seeking relief, but the Court expressed disinclination to entertain it. The petitioners then applied for leave to withdraw the petition and to file documents before the executing court under Order XXI Rule 97 of the Code of Civil …
The petitioner, Mohd Anjum Ashraf Shaikh, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an externment order dated 19 September 2025 issued under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The petitioner had already filed a statutory appeal under Section 60 of the same Act, which had been adjourned …
The appellants challenged a district court decree dated 20 November 2025 that upheld an earlier trial‑court order restraining them from obstructing the respondent’s construction of a compound wall, by preserving a 6‑ft pathway for ingress and egress. The dispute originated from a 2009 suit (RCS …
The appellants challenged a district court decree dated 20 November 2025 that upheld an earlier trial‑court order restraining them from obstructing the respondent’s construction of a compound wall, by preserving a 6‑ft pathway for ingress and egress. The dispute originated from a 2009 suit (RCS …
Petitioner Chandrakant C. Shah challenged a notice of contempt issued by a First Class Magistrate for alleged rude conduct towards the magistrate. He argued that the magistrate lacked jurisdiction to entertain contempt proceedings and sought a declaration that the notice was void. The Court examined …
The petitioners, accused in criminal complaints, sought to recall the complainant for cross‑examination after a magistrate had issued a "no‑cross" order under Section 311 of the CrPC. Their applications for dismissal of the complaint and for recall were rejected by the magistrate and later by the …
The petitioners, accused in criminal complaints, sought to recall the complainant for cross‑examination after a magistrate had issued a "no‑cross" order under Section 311 of the CrPC. Their applications for dismissal of the complaint and for recall were rejected by the magistrate and later by the …
The applicant, Sunil Shivaji Pagare, sought a revision of an order dated 4 October 2025 that rejected his application to have the respondents' counter‑claim dismissed. The applicant argued that the counter‑claim was barred because he had previously filed a suit (RCS No.11 of 2019) which was …
The applicants sought a decree on admission for prayer clauses (a) to (d) while asking the court to reject prayer clause (e) under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. The trial court dismissed the notice of motion, holding that the plaintiffs also sought a permanent injunction and that Order VII Rule 11 …
The applicant, Jayant Maniklal Lunawat, filed a civil revision application (No. 111 of 2026) against the respondents, Hiraman Baburao Choudhary and his legal heirs. The applicant, through counsel Ms. Shrushti Relekar of Dhruve Liladhar and Co., sought the court's permission to withdraw the revision …
The applicants, Times Logistics Ltd. and others, filed a civil revision application before the Bombay High Court against Best Roadways Ltd. The dispute concerned whether the City Civil Court possessed territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit. Both parties were represented, with Ms. Mahalakshmi …
The petitioners Sunil Kashinath Kamthe and others filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement and executed consent terms. Both sides applied to the court for leave to tender these consent terms. The court examined the submissions, found no …
The Applicants filed a Civil Revision Application No. 476 of 2025 before the High Court of Bombay. They sought leave to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to pursue any other legal remedies. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the leave to withdraw as prayed. Consequently, …
The applicants, Suresh Eknath Kalate and another, filed Civil Revision Application No. 588 of 2025 in the High Court of Bombay. They later moved the Court seeking leave to withdraw the revision application while retaining the liberty to raise all grounds for rejection of the plaint at the time of …
Petitioners Pooja Ranjit Bhujbal and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petition sought correction of the respondent's name in the cause title. The Court examined the petition and ordered that the name "Ravindra Shankar Kunte (deceased)" be corrected to "Narayan Shankar …
The petitioner, Christopher Cyril Correia, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee's order dismissing his appeal against an Appellate Authority decision that declared his father ineligible for the Amrapali slum rehabilitation scheme. The father had …
The petitioners sought a stay of execution of a decree passed in RCS No.132 of 2004 under Order XXI Rule 29 of the Code of Civil Procedure, arguing that their suit for adverse possession (RCS No.127 of 2015) was pending. The respondent trust had obtained a final decree for possession of the suit …
The plaintiffs filed a suit seeking declaration, partition and possession of their one‑fifth shares in certain ancestral properties and to declare gift deeds executed by Defendant No.1 in favour of Defendant No.2 as void. Defendant No.2 moved an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of …
The petitioner, Charu Kishor Mehta, filed a criminal complaint alleging forgery of mortgage and loan documents that led to the seizure and sale of her flat. The complaint was dismissed by the Magistrate, who held that the petitioner had previously lost civil proceedings and had not raised the …
The applicant, who was the first informant in FIR No. 191/1995, sought the return of property seized during the investigation. An earlier order by the Metropolitan Magistrate allowing the return was set aside by this Court, and the property was kept in custody. After the criminal case (Cr. No. …
The petitioners, employees of Shiny Shipping, were arrested after customs officers seized about 120 KL of diesel and cash from the vessel M.V. Tina 4 and were denied bail by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on the ground that the offences under Section 135(1)(i) of the Customs Act were …
The petitioners, Somnath Ramhari Gawade and others, filed a writ petition challenging a District Judge's order that refused an ex‑parte ad‑interim injunction while a Miscellaneous Civil Appeal was pending. The underlying dispute concerned a Tahsildar's order under Section 143 of the Maharashtra Land …
The petitioner, Ashok Sanjeev Shetty, challenged an order dated 27 January 2026 that suspended his entertainment licence for operating an orchestra for 15 days, effective from 29 January 2026. He argued that he had filed an appeal on the same day, but the appellate authority had not yet heard it, …
Chandrakant More filed a writ petition against Pune Municipal Corporation and others. The petitioner, through counsel Omkar Nagvekar and Ms. Prabha Badadare, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The High Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
The petitioner, Apurva Jayantilal Shah, filed a writ petition challenging clauses 3 and 4 of an order that directed the execution court to act on a notice of motion filed by the respondents, who are judgment debtors. The petitioner argued that those directions were unnecessary and beyond the scope …
The petition under Article 227 challenged a Civil Judge's order admitting several unregistered sale‑cum‑development agreements as exhibits. The defendants argued that Section 49(c) of the Registration Act, 1908 barred such admission because the documents were unregistered and the suit was not for …
The High Court corrected the name of the appellant in three second appeals from "Ultra Lifespace Pvt Ltd" to "Ulltra Lifespace Pvt. Ltd." as per the order dated 17 December 2025. The appellant asserted that it had cleared outstanding maintenance and other charges owed to the society, albeit five …
Shobha Shriprakash Kulkarni filed a writ petition challenging the District Judge's order dismissing her application to condone a delay of over five years in filing an appeal against a judgment of the Court of Small Causes, Pune. The petitioner sought relief to file the appeal despite the delay. The …
The petitioner, a co‑owner of land declared a slum, challenged an order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee that dismissed his appeal against a CEO, SRA, order allowing a developer to implement a slum‑rehabilitation scheme on the subject land. The petitioner argued that the CEO’s direction to …
The petitioners sought to amend the description of the suit property to correct the Gat number and assessment, arguing that the amendment did not change the nature or identity of the property and caused no prejudice. The trial court rejected the amendment, invoking the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 of …
The Association of Shnd Hostel Alumni (ASHA) filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Charity Commissioner, Mumbai and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the application, granted leave …
The petitioner, Vikrant @ Vicky Vinayak Bhosle, filed a writ petition challenging a non‑bailable warrant issued on 18 August 2024 by the Sessions Court. He asserted his readiness to appear before the Sessions Judge and sought cancellation of the warrant. The High Court, after hearing counsel, noted …
The Association of Shnd Hostel Alumni (ASHA) filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Charity Commissioner, Mumbai and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the application, granted leave …
The applicants, Sachin Chandrakant Salukhe and another, filed an interim application seeking permission to amend their writ petition after the criminal complaint against the respondent, Adarsh Deepak Malik, was transferred to the Court of Magistrate at Mira‑Bhayandar. The Court examined whether …
Dr. Rakesh Chandra Vemuri filed a writ petition challenging a City Civil Court order that dismissed his notice of motion seeking condonation of a 44‑day delay in filing an affidavit for leave to defend a summary suit. The defendant, Crown Veterinary Services, argued that the delay was caused by the …
The petitioner, a former foreman of the respondent partnership firm, occupied a flat provided as a service tenant and refused to vacate after his employment ended in 2007. The respondent filed an eviction suit under Section 16(1)(f) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and the petitioner …
The petitioner, Iyyapan Gopalkrishnan Iyer, filed a writ petition challenging a judgment dated 1 April 2025 that upheld a trial court order rejecting an application for status quo. The High Court expressed its disinclination to entertain the petition and the petitioner’s counsel sought leave to …
The petitioners, Gayatri Builders, challenged a May 9, 2024 order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nashik that allowed the respondents to amend their plaint to include a prayer that any compensation arising from acquisition of the suit property would not be payable to certain defendants. The …
The petitioners, who claim ownership of a property in Thane, filed a suit for declaration of title and possession against defendants who had allegedly encroached on the land. Respondents Nos.21‑42 applied to be impleaded as defendants, asserting that they were in actual possession of portions of the …
The petitioner, Ryan Rodrigues, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a criminal matter. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the petition and instead pursue a revision application before the Sessions Court. The Court considered whether such a …
The petitioner, a manager of B.N. Jewels, sought the return of gold and dust seized by police during an investigation of a robbery. The Sessions Judge had rejected both the owner's and the petitioner's applications for return, citing lack of dimensions, hallmark details, and the presence of multiple …
Petitioners Neetu Vishal Pinjani and others filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. They sought permission to withdraw the petition and instead file a revision application before the Sessions Court. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted leave to …
The applicant, Shaikh Tanveer Mohammed Sha, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court seeking relief, presumably bail, against the Union of India and others. The applicant's counsel informed the court that the trial court had already passed an order on the bail application during the …
The petitioners‑defendants challenged several orders of the trial court that closed their evidence and rejected applications to recall those orders, alleging denial of their right to adduce evidence. The trial court had closed the evidence of most defendants because they failed to confirm …
Amol Ramdas Konde and Krushnat Mahadev Aarde were charged in CR No.124/2022 for offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 82 of the Registration Act, alleging forgery of a NA order. Their first anticipatory bail application (ABA …
Varun Sundar Shetty filed a writ petition challenging the delay in hearing Externment Appeal No. 22/2025, which was filed in February 2025 against an externment order dated 10 January 2025. The Appellate Authority had not listed the appeal for hearing. The petitioner argued that the statutory remedy …
The Registrar noted that the Second Appeal No. 731 of 2022 had been listed four times and that despite a six‑week extension, the parties had failed to remove the office objections. Under Chapter V of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, parties must clear such objections within 14 days …
