Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
88 judgments · newest first · showing 1–88
The appellant Mukesh D. Gangurde filed an appeal under Section 14A of the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act challenging an order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, which granted anticipatory bail to the respondent Vilas D. Pagar. The appellant argued that the Sessions Court ignored the …
The appellant, Rajesh Surya Prasad Parmar, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court seeking leave to withdraw the proceedings. The appellant's counsel, Mr. Avinash D. Kango, submitted a letter, on the appellant's instructions, requesting withdrawal of the appeal. The court recorded the …
The applicant, Shreekant Ramchandra Chavan, filed an interim application seeking recall of a bailable warrant issued against him on 14 July 2026. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, opposed the application. The High Court, after considering the submissions of counsel for both parties, ordered …
The appellant, Suresh M. Chhatwani, appealed against the Metropolitan Magistrate's order acquitting Umesh Dinesh Shah (Respondent No.1) of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed in the Bombay High Court. The record showed that the appellant was not …
The appellant Chunnilal Chimanaji Choudhari appealed against the acquittal of respondent Hanumant Kashiram Patil in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial magistrate had acquitted the respondent, noting that the notice issued to him was returned unserved because his …
M/s. Maxwell Industries Ltd. appealed against the acquittal of the second respondent in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Metropolitan Magistrate had acquitted the respondent, prompting the appellant to file a criminal appeal. During the proceedings, it became evident …
The appellant, M/s. Jaychemie, appealed against the Metropolitan Magistrate’s order dismissing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for want of prosecution and acquitting Respondent No.1. The appellant contended that both he and his counsel had attended every …
The petitioner, Sujata Bappasaheb Patange, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Bombay against the State of Maharashtra. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the application and failed to take any steps to prosecute it. No substantive arguments or …
Petitioner Aparna Ajinkya Firodia filed a writ petition seeking the removal of Ajinkya Arun Firodia from a board, alleging that his appointment was wrongful. The respondent contested the claim. The court examined whether the appointment complied with applicable procedural and statutory requirements. …
Parle Sales Services Pvt. Ltd. appealed the acquittal of Y.N. Todankar (Respondent No.1) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as ordered by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri, on 21 November 2006. The appellant indicated it was not interested in prosecuting the appeal. The High …
Fortis Financial Services Ltd. appealed the acquittal of two respondents in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Metropolitan Magistrate had discharged the respondents, prompting the appellant to file a criminal appeal. The High Court issued a notice to the appellant, to …
The appellants, Shahbaj Farukh Patel & Ors., appealed against an order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel, which had rejected their applications for discharge in a Special (Atrocity) case involving multiple IPC, SC/ST Act and Arms Act offences. The appellants sought to withdraw the appeal for …
National Polymers appealed against the acquittal of Eastern Polymers, Govind R. Rohiwal and Bhanwarlal Sadalpuria by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Mazgaon, for an alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The magistrate had found the respondents not guilty. During the …
Nutech Feeds Pvt. Ltd. appealed against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge who had set aside a conviction of Pramod N. Patil under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The original conviction dated 1 December 2006 was overturned, and the appellant sought to challenge that decision. …
Nitika Rao filed an anticipatory bail application which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan. She appealed the order (Criminal Appeal No. 351 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on her behalf, and the record showed she was not interested in prosecuting the …
Aniket R. Kuskar was convicted in a case involving offences under the IPC (sections 323, 354(B), 376(2)(N), 420, 504, 506) and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He was alleged to have deceived a woman about marrying her while already married, leading to sexual intercourse and extortion. The …
The appellant C.A. Consultants appealed against the acquittal of Thinking Machines Pvt. Ltd. and others by a Judicial Magistrate in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The magistrate had found the respondents not guilty. The appellant’s counsel failed to appear, and the …
The appellants, Suryakant Varhade and Lalita Pawar, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, for allegedly planting a cannabis plant in the courtyard of their residence, under Sections 20(b)(i) of the NDPS Act. The prosecution’s case was based on a raid conducted after receiving …
The appellants were convicted for a bank dacoity under Sections 395 read with 397 and 342 read with 34 of the IPC, based primarily on a test identification parade. The prosecution alleged that the accused, armed with weapons, robbed a bank on 12 December 1995. The defense argued that the …
The appellant Khandu Kondaji Dongare filed Criminal Appeal No. 622 of 2009 against the State of Maharashtra and others. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant sought leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal in view of subsequent developments. The Court considered the request and examined …
The appellant filed a complaint alleging that the respondents formed an unlawful assembly, were armed, damaged the appellant's property and set fire to a cattle shed, invoking Sections 147, 148, 447, 435, 451 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. The Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted the …
Bankesh Bhavsar filed an interim application in Criminal Appeal No.1408 of 2019 seeking relief from a direction dated 13‑02‑2026 that required him to furnish a local surety. The High Court, after hearing counsel for the applicant and the Special Public Prosecutor for SEBI, exercised its discretion …
The petitioner, Pooja Motilal Pandey, challenged an order of the Additional Sessions Judge that had allowed a criminal revision filed by respondents Nos.2 and 3 and quashed the process issued against them for offences under Sections 499 and 500 of the IPC. The petitioner argued that the Sessions …
Ramesh D. Ajmera filed an interim application before the Bombay High Court seeking relief from an order dated 20 November 2025 that had affected his Criminal Revision Application No.199 of 2016 against the Central Bureau of Investigation. The applicant contended that the order should be recalled and …
The applicants, Vandana Shah and another, filed a criminal revision application challenging an order dated 26 February 2021. They later sought leave to withdraw that revision application and requested liberty to file an appeal against the same order. The respondent, Sanjeev Doshi and others, were …
The petitioner, Yatin Pandharinath Vekhande, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. On instructions, the petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, finding no objection, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was disposed of …
Anuraag Agarwal filed Writ Petition No. 1531 of 2025 and Contempt Petition No. 663 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court. The Court had earlier disposed Writ Petition No. 3224 of 2026 by an order dated 16 July 2026. The petitioner subsequently moved a Praecipe on 17 July 2026 seeking modification of …
The father (Petitioner) filed an interim application seeking a temporary order allowing his daughter, Mihika, to travel to the United States for a ceremony, with a condition that she return to India by a specified date. The mother (Respondent) opposed, alleging that the father had previously taken …
The applicant, a minor represented by his maternal grandfather, sought condonation of a 672‑day delay in filing a revision against an ex‑parte order dated 30 June 2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel. The applicant argued that the ex‑parte nature of the order meant no summons or …
The petitioner-wife filed a writ petition challenging the Family Court's order rejecting her application to amend a counterclaim in a divorce proceeding on the ground that the amendment was sought after the issues were framed. The High Court examined the Supreme Court's pronouncement in Mahila …
The petitioner, Pooja Swapnil Sonawane, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a divorce from her husband, Swapnil Sandeep Sonawane. The High Court, after hearing counsel, directed the Family Court to allow the petitioner-wife to file a written statement on the next date. It also …
Rupali Sachin Kadam filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against her husband, Sachin Shankar Kadam. The petition pertained to a pending family court case (Petition No. A‑2208 of 2021) originally filed in the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai. By consent, the High Court ordered …
The Bombay High Court, after referring the writ petitions to mediation, received a report indicating that the parties had amicably settled their dispute. The Settlement Terms and Settlement Agreement were annexed to the report and marked for identification. Both parties' counsel requested that the …
The Bombay High Court, after referring the writ petitions to mediation, received a report indicating that the parties had amicably settled their dispute. The Settlement Terms and Settlement Agreement were annexed to the report and marked for identification. Both parties' counsel requested that the …
The applicants, Vimal G. Savalia and Vinubhai R. Talaviya, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in Crime No.730 of 2025 for alleged offences under IPC Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 read with 34, relating to alleged preparation of false documents concerning a plot owned by Smt. …
Salman Anis Dolare filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court but did not disclose any criminal antecedents in the petition. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Sonia Santis appearing on behalf of Adv. Umar Kazi, sought permission to withdraw the application and to file a fresh one …
Salman Anis Dolare filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court but did not disclose any criminal antecedents in the petition. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Sonia Santis appearing on behalf of Adv. Umar Kazi, sought permission to withdraw the application and to file a fresh one …
Sanjay Shankar Kalekar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the application because the criminal antecedents of the applicant were not disclosed in the filing. The court considered whether the application could be withdrawn …
Mayuri Mangesh Surve applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No.622 of 2025 for alleged theft of a Mangalsutra worth Rs.9,87,972. The offences alleged were under Sections 3(5) and 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, a family friend of the first informant, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Pawan Singh Bhopal Singh Rathod, who feared arrest in a case alleging misappropriation of Rs.15,88,150 under Sections 316(4), 344 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the applicant’s brother …
Sharif Mohammed Bapu Thottyli applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 75, 78, 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act for alleged sexual harassment, stalking and outraging modesty of a female athlete. The prosecution alleged that …
The applicant, Gayatri, filed a criminal application under Section 407 of the CrPC seeking transfer of a case, which the High Court ordered on 5 March 2025, moving it from a Metropolitan Magistrate to a Joint Judicial Magistrate First Class in Alibaug. Subsequently, she filed an interim application …
Nausheen Nasir Khan filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in Crime No. 22 of 2026 for alleged assault on a first informant and his family member, allegedly using fists and scissors, causing simple injuries. The offences alleged are under Sections 351(2), 352, 115(2), 118(1) and 333 …
The applicant, a reputed jeweller, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case involving alleged misappropriation of gold bracelets weighing 1517.6 grams, alleged under Sections 3(5), 316(5) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution presented CCTV footage …
The applicant, Gurmeet Singh Labana, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in Crime No. 1002 of 2025 registered at Ulhasnagar Police Station for offences under Sections 109, 352, 115(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 37(2) & 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The …
The applicant, Chirag G. Padwal, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in Crime No. 214 of 2025 for alleged forgery of government documents under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged his involvement based on a co‑accused's interrogation, …
The petitioner, Kamal Kumar Jain, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an unspecified action of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, applied for leave to withdraw the writ petition. The Court, exercising its inherent jurisdiction, considered …
The petitioner, Kamal Kumar Jain, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an unspecified action of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, applied for leave to withdraw the writ petition. The Court, exercising its inherent jurisdiction, considered …
Suresh N. Rughani filed an application under Section 447 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to have a domestic‑violence case pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate 27th Court, Mulund, transferred to any other competent court except those in Mumbai and Thane districts. He …
The High Court had already disposed of the anticipatory bail application (No. 90 of 2026) on 20 February 2026. An interim application (No. 188 of 2026) was filed thereafter, seeking further relief. The Court observed that, since the main anticipatory bail application had been fully decided, there …
The applicant, Sumit Pal Singh, filed several criminal applications (Nos. 351, 368, 369, 370 of 2023) before the High Court of Bombay. The Court earlier listed the applications for dismissal on 13 February 2026. On 17 February 2026, no appearance was made on behalf of the applicant. Consequently, …
The applicant, Sumit Pal Singh, filed several criminal applications (Nos. 351, 368, 369, 370 of 2023) before the High Court of Bombay. The Court earlier listed the applications for dismissal on 13 February 2026. On 17 February 2026, no appearance was made on behalf of the applicant. Consequently, …
The applicant, Sumit Pal Singh, filed several criminal applications (Nos. 351, 368, 369, 370 of 2023) before the High Court of Bombay. The Court earlier listed the applications for dismissal on 13 February 2026. On 17 February 2026, no appearance was made on behalf of the applicant. Consequently, …
The applicant, Sumit Pal Singh, filed several criminal applications (Nos. 351, 368, 369, 370 of 2023) before the High Court of Bombay. The Court earlier listed the applications for dismissal on 13 February 2026. On 17 February 2026, no appearance was made on behalf of the applicant. Consequently, …
The applicant, Priyanka Rishi, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Bombay. Subsequent developments prompted the applicant's counsel to seek the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The sole issue before the Court was whether the withdrawal could be permitted. The Court, …
Sabina Lakdawala filed an application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act seeking interim relief, and the Metropolitan Magistrate ordered the respondents to pay maintenance and house rent. Both parties appealed; the appellate court dismissed the respondents' appeal and partially …
The applicant, Shaikh Rizan Shaikh Usman Qureshi, had filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. Subsequent developments prompted his counsel to seek leave to withdraw the application. The Court, after considering the request, permitted the withdrawal and ordered the …
The applicant, Shaikh Rizan Shaikh Usman Qureshi, had filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. Subsequent developments prompted his counsel to seek leave to withdraw the application. The Court, after considering the request, permitted the withdrawal and ordered the …
Sabina Lakdawala filed an application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act seeking interim maintenance, which the Metropolitan Magistrate ordered at Rs.1,25,000 per month plus house rent. Both Sabina and the respondents (Feroz and Noorie Lakdawala) appealed; the appellate court …
The applicants, Rachana R. Waghole, Rajashree R. Waghole and Bhavna R. Waghole, filed anticipatory bail applications fearing arrest in a fraud case (Cr. No. 811 of 2025) alleging violations of IPC Sections 406, 420 and 34. The prosecution alleged that the co‑accused induced a first informant to …
The applicant, Vivek Handore, was arrested in connection with a June 2024 incident involving assault with a sharp weapon and a revolver, alleged to be an attempt to murder under IPC sections 307, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 and Arms Act sections 3 with 25 and 4 with 27. The prosecution argued that …
The applicants sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No. 904 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 108, 80, 85 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was lodged on 21 December 2024 despite the alleged incident occurring on 3 September 2024, creating a substantial …
The applicant, Nilesh Damodar Kathpal, had filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay. He later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw that application and to file a fresh one. The sole issue before the court was whether the applicant could be allowed to …
The applicant, Nitin Chandrakant Gupte, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant failed to appear on the scheduled dates of 26 March, 2 April, and 4 April 2019. The State of Maharashtra was represented by Advocate P. H. Gaikwad. The Court observed the repeated …
Shakti Sikandarlal Kapoor, a 74‑year‑old senior citizen suffering from severe calcified triple‑vessel disease, applied for transit anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 68 of 2024, which alleges fraud and includes offences under Sections 323, 341, 342, 420, 406, 467, 468, 504 and 120B of …
The applicant, Fairoza Akil Arai, had filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. Subsequently, the applicant sought leave to withdraw the application. The court considered whether it could grant such leave. Exercising its discretion, the court allowed the withdrawal. …
The State of Maharashtra filed a report under Section 169 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against respondents No.2 and No.3, indicating that the prosecution lacked sufficient evidence. The applicant, Gurvish Jayantilal Modi, sought cancellation of the anticipatory bail previously granted to the …
Aruna Pradeep Rathi filed a complaint against ten respondents alleging offences under IPC sections 465, 467, 468, 474, 409 read with 120B. The Metropolitan Magistrate took cognizance, ordered a police investigation under Section 202 of the CrPC, and later received a police report confirming the …
Kuldeep Sharma applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2018 fraud case (Crime No.164) involving alleged impersonation of government officials and cheating Rs.59 lakh, punishable under IPC sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 506 read with 34. The prosecution alleged his participation, while …
Aakash Pralhad Pole applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No. 214 of 2025 for alleged cattle theft, charged under Sections 325, 303(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 11(1)(c) of the Animal Cruelty Act. The prosecution’s charge‑sheet contained only the co‑accused’s …
The applicant, Anand Madhav Ashtaputre, filed an interim application seeking permission to renew his passport while a criminal case (Criminal Application No. 535 of 2018) was pending. The respondent State opposed the application. The court heard counsel for both sides and held that there is no legal …
The Bombay High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sandeep Arora, the Managing Director of High Ground Enterprises Ltd., who feared arrest in a fraud case involving alleged bogus invoices for lease‑finance equipment. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, in collusion …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No. 120 of 2023, which involves offences under Sections 354, 354-D, 323, 504, 506, 376 and 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that over four years the applicant, under threat, had forced the victim into sexual …
The appellant, Tulshiram Gopal Manere, was convicted by a Special Judge under Sections 376(n), 323, 354, 506 of the IPC and Sections 6, 5(l)(m), 10, 9(l)(m) of the POCSO Act, receiving multiple terms of rigorous imprisonment and fines. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 1301 of 2019 challenging the …
Navin Ashok Israni applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No.791 of 2024 under Section 316(4) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He was alleged to have received Rs.1,25,64,894 from customers as store manager of Fairpick Private Limited and deposited only Rs.80,09,923 …
The applicants, Prajakt Prabhakar Surve and Rajiv Devendra Sone, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No.648 of 2025 for alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 406 and 34 relating to a disputed car transaction and alleged forgery. The prosecution alleged that the applicants, together …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No. 829 of 2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Police Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant and co‑accused assaulted the first informant with a stick and knife, causing grievous …
The applicant, a scrap dealer, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a fraud case involving the loading of excess scrap material. The offence alleged under Sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) and 62 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pertained to substituting a …
The petitioners, AU Small Finance Bank and its officials, challenged a magistrate’s order that issued criminal process against them under several IPC sections for an alleged fraudulent loan. The complainant claimed a loan was obtained using his and his wife’s signatures on a blank application, which …
Arun N. Ambekar filed Interim Application No. 4612 of 2022 seeking to withdraw Rs.45 lakhs (plus interest) that had been deposited under Interim Application No. 3961 of 2023, pursuant to the Court's order dated 18 November 2021 in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1055 of 2021. The State of …
The applicant, Bharat Navinchandra Gala, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 978 of 2024) before the Bombay High Court. The applicant sought leave to implead the first informant as a party respondent to the bail application. The Court granted the leave, directing that the necessary amendment …
The applicant, Amaan Naseem Bhabe, filed an anticipatory bail application (No.1295 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court. The State's counsel informed the Court that the applicant had already been arrested. In view of the arrest, the Court held that the anticipatory bail application could no longer …
Aniket Anil Mujumdar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a fraud case (Crime No.265 of 2025) involving alleged misappropriation of Rs.2.93 crore from investors. The prosecution alleged that Mujumdar, together with co‑accused Sandesh Joshi, induced investors and benefitted from the fraud, …
Shantabai Kisan Karandekar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was disposed of as …
The Bombay High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Khushal Singh, who feared arrest in a fraud case (Crime No.432 of 2025) involving alleged inducement of investors into a forex scheme and a loss of Rs.1 crore. The prosecution alleged that Singh, along with co‑accused, …
The petitioners Hari Lal Singh and Dashrath Hari Singh applied for anticipatory bail in a fraud case involving alleged forex trading scams amounting to Rs.1 crore. Dashrath Hari Singh was arrested during the pendency of the application and sought to withdraw his application, which the court disposed …
The applicant, Gautam Shahajirao Kakade, was arrested for offences including murder (IPC s.302) and several other IPC and Arms Act sections arising from an altercation over a unpaid amount for a bullock, during which a co-accused shot the deceased. The prosecution alleges the applicant called the …
The applicant, Gautam Shahajirao Kakade, was arrested for offences including murder (IPC s.302) and several other IPC and Arms Act sections arising from an altercation over a unpaid amount for a bullock, during which a co-accused shot the deceased. The prosecution alleges the applicant called the …
