Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
104 judgments · newest first · showing 1–104
The petitioner, an Additional District Judge, sought to quash a departmental inquiry and his suspension, alleging that the inquiry violated Ministry of Law and Justice guidelines requiring a complaint with an affidavit. The High Court examined whether the disciplinary authority could initiate an …
The State of Gujarat filed a Letters Patent Appeal No. 694 of 2026 against Divyakalanben Danjibhai Baraiya and others. The appeal raised certain issues that had already been examined in Letters Patent Appeal No. 448/2026, where the State's pleas were dismissed. The Court noted that there was no …
The petitioners Yogesh Dashrathbhai Patel and another filed a civil application before the Gujarat High Court seeking condonation of a 273‑day delay in filing an appeal against the order of the District Development Officer, Gandhinagar. The respondent, represented by the Assistant Government …
The Methodist Church, India filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of an 83‑day delay in filing its appeal. The respondent state, represented by an AGP, waived service of notice. Counsel for the applicant explained the reasons for the delay, which the Court …
Four former employees of Dharampur Nagar Palika claimed pension benefits after reaching superannuation. The petitioners argued that, like earlier panchayat employees who were absorbed into the municipality, they were entitled to pension under the General Provident Fund (GPF) scheme. The Single Judge …
The State Government in 2009 attempted to cancel a higher pay scale (Rs 5,000‑8,000) granted to librarians who had completed nine years of service, issuing recovery instructions. The librarians challenged the cancellation through Special Civil Applications (Nos. 10305‑10307 of 2009). A Single Judge …
The State Government in 2009 attempted to cancel a higher pay scale (Rs 5,000‑8,000) granted to librarians who had completed nine years of service, issuing recovery instructions. The librarians challenged the cancellation through Special Civil Applications (Nos. 10305‑10307 of 2009). A Single Judge …
The Banaskantha District Panchayat, represented by the District Development Officer Maheshkumar Dave, filed a Letters Patent Appeal but missed the prescribed filing deadline by two days. The respondents, Ashishkumar Dave and others, opposed the condonation of this delay. The Court examined whether …
D.J. Parmar, a railway employee, was charged in 1999 with abusing his position to help his daughter cheat in a Railway Recruitment Board exam, leading to his removal from service. The charge was based on alleged manipulation of his nomination as centre‑in‑charge and tampering with answer sheets, …
M/s. Janardan J. Raval filed a Special Civil Application (writ petition) before the Gujarat High Court. The petitioner’s counsel submitted written instructions to withdraw the petition and placed the instructions on record. The Court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. …
The State of Gujarat issued an e‑auction tender for plots, requiring bidders to deposit an Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) and submit a sealed bid. M/s Seebaat Developers deposited the EMD and tender fee but claimed a technical glitch prevented submission of a sealed bid; the authority rejected the …
The Gujarat High Court considered a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Kandla Port Trust (now Deendayal Port Trust) against a single judge’s order that set aside the employee’s removal (July 2017) and dismissal (September 2018) and remanded the matter for a minor penalty. The employee, Sanjay …
The Managing Director of Karmachari Cooperative Bank filed a Letters Patent Appeal after a delay of 48 days. The respondent filed an opposition, and the matter was brought before the Gujarat High Court as a civil application for condonation of delay. The applicant argued that the delay was not …
The petitioner, Sandipani Global Education and Charitable Trust, filed a Special Civil Application seeking permission to withdraw its writ petition against Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Mayur Kishanchandani, while the respondent was represented by Mr. Nandish …
The District Development Officer filed a special civil application seeking condonation of a 323‑day delay in filing a Letters Patent Appeal. The applicant explained the reasons for the delay, and the court examined whether the explanation satisfied the requirements for condonation under the Civil …
The State of Gujarat filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 296‑day delay in filing a Letter Patent Appeal (LPA). The court heard counsel for both parties and considered the reasons for the delay. Accepting the explanation provided, the court allowed the application and condoned the …
A group of workmen who were terminated approached the Labour Court, which ordered their reinstatement without back‑wages but granted continuity of service. The State challenged this award by filing a writ petition, and the Single Judge set aside the award on the ground of the workmen’s delay in …
A group of workmen who were terminated approached the Labour Court, which ordered their reinstatement without back‑wages but granted continuity of service. The State challenged this award by filing a writ petition, and the Single Judge set aside the award on the ground of the workmen’s delay in …
A group of workmen who were terminated approached the Labour Court, which ordered their reinstatement without back‑wages but granted continuity of service. The State challenged this award by filing a writ petition, and the Single Judge set aside the award on the ground of the workmen’s delay in …
A group of workmen who were terminated approached the Labour Court, which ordered their reinstatement without back‑wages but granted continuity of service. The State challenged this award by filing a writ petition, and the Single Judge set aside the award on the ground of the workmen’s delay in …
A group of workmen who were terminated approached the Labour Court, which ordered their reinstatement without back‑wages but granted continuity of service. The State challenged this award by filing a writ petition, and the Single Judge set aside the award on the ground of the workmen’s delay in …
A group of workmen who were terminated approached the Labour Court, which ordered their reinstatement without back‑wages but granted continuity of service. The State challenged this award by filing a writ petition, and the Single Judge set aside the award on the ground of the workmen’s delay in …
The petitioner, AONE Exploration Private Ltd., challenged ONGC's rejection of its bid for chemical dosing pump services on the ground that it had not uploaded the required integrity pact. The petitioner argued that, as a registered vendor, it was exempt from re‑submitting the integrity pact, relying …
The Institute of Teaching and Research in Ayurveda filed a writ petition challenging the appellant's imposition of penal rent on certain quarters. The Single Judge held that if renovation was required, the respondent could shift to other premises offered by the appellant at the same rent. The …
The appellant, Krunal Thakorbhai Tandel, challenged the selection of a candidate who held an Industrial Engineering degree for the post of Assistant Professor, arguing that a Gujarat Government Resolution (GR) that recognized his Mechanical Engineering degree as equivalent should not also grant …
A group of workmen who were terminated approached the Labour Court, which ordered their reinstatement without back‑wages but granted continuity of service. The State challenged this award by filing a writ petition, and the Single Judge set aside the award on the ground of the workmen’s delay in …
A group of workmen who were terminated approached the Labour Court, which ordered their reinstatement without back‑wages but granted continuity of service. The State challenged this award by filing a writ petition, and the Single Judge set aside the award on the ground of the workmen’s delay in …
A group of workmen who were terminated approached the Labour Court, which ordered their reinstatement without back‑wages but granted continuity of service. The State challenged this award by filing a writ petition, and the Single Judge set aside the award on the ground of the workmen’s delay in …
A group of workmen who were terminated approached the Labour Court, which ordered their reinstatement without back‑wages but granted continuity of service. The State challenged this award by filing a writ petition, and the Single Judge set aside the award on the ground of the workmen’s delay in …
A group of workmen who were terminated approached the Labour Court, which ordered their reinstatement without back‑wages but granted continuity of service. The State challenged this award by filing a writ petition, and the Single Judge set aside the award on the ground of the workmen’s delay in …
A group of workmen who were terminated approached the Labour Court, which ordered their reinstatement without back‑wages but granted continuity of service. The State challenged this award by filing a writ petition, and the Single Judge set aside the award on the ground of the workmen’s delay in …
The Gujarat High Court examined two writ petitions challenging the award of a Rs 122.97‑crore sewage‑treatment‑plant contract. R & B Infra Project Ltd. argued that its bid was unfairly rejected first for incomplete online upload, then on a technical ground that its MoU was on a Rs 100 stamp paper …
The Gujarat High Court examined two writ petitions challenging the award of a Rs 122.97‑crore sewage‑treatment‑plant contract. R & B Infra Project Ltd. argued that its bid was unfairly rejected first for incomplete online upload, then on a technical ground that its MoU was on a Rs 100 stamp paper …
The petitioner, PMP Infratack Ltd., challenged an order by Oil and Natural Gas Ltd (ONGC) that banned it from contracting, which was based on the termination of their contract. Both parties admitted that during the pendency of the writ petition the dispute was referred to arbitration, and the …
The Manager/Sanchalak/Secretary Prantij Taluka Education Society filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking restoration of its appeal. The court examined the application and considered whether the appeal could be reinstated to the original file and whether interim relief should be extended. No …
The Lilavati Foundation, represented by its authorized signatory Vaibhav Dhariwal, filed multiple restoration applications before the Gujarat High Court. The foundation sought the Court's permission to withdraw these applications while retaining the liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings in the …
The Lilavati Foundation, represented by its authorized signatory Vaibhav Dhariwal, filed multiple restoration applications before the Gujarat High Court. The foundation sought the Court's permission to withdraw these applications while retaining the liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings in the …
The Lilavati Foundation, represented by its authorized signatory Vaibhav Dhariwal, filed multiple restoration applications before the Gujarat High Court. The foundation sought the Court's permission to withdraw these applications while retaining the liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings in the …
The respondents, appointed as Class‑III Medical Officers in 1978‑80, became eligible for promotion to Class‑II after five years of service under the Gujarat Medical Service Class‑II Recruitment Rules, 1977. Despite meeting this eligibility, the State recruited 400 allopathic doctors between 1983‑93 …
Jayshrikumari Ishvarbhai Patel applied for the post of Shikshan Sahayak (Assistant Teacher) in Sociology under the Scheduled Tribe reservation. She was rejected because she held a B.A. in Sociology but only an M.A. in Education, not an M.A. in Sociology as required by the Government Higher Secondary …
Chiragkumar Mohanbhai Tank filed a Letters Patent Appeal (No. 388 of 2026) seeking to withdraw the appeal because the main writ petition was scheduled for final disposal on 23 June 2026. The appellant's counsel requested permission to withdraw, and the court entertained the request. The High Court …
The appellant filed a Letters Patent Appeal (C/LPA/389/2026) seeking permission to withdraw the appeal because the principal writ petition concerning a recruitment matter was scheduled for final disposal on 23 June 2026. The court considered the request and, without examining the merits of the …
The appellant, Kuvarben Kamalkhan Parmar, filed a Letters Patent Appeal (No. 250 of 2026) against the State of Gujarat and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel indicated that she did not wish to pursue the appeal. Consequently, the Court disposed of the appeal as not pressed. No …
The Municipal Commissioner and others filed a Letters Patent Appeal (No. 320 of 2026) against the Vadodara Municipal Employees Union. The appellants argued that the issues raised in their writ appeal were already decided in Letters Patent Appeal No. 294 of 2026. The Court examined the claim and …
The Municipal Commissioner and others appealed against Mohite Mansingrao Narayanrao and others, claiming that the issues raised in their writ appeal were already decided in Letters Patent Appeal No. 294 of 2026. The Court examined the claim and found that the matter was indeed covered by the earlier …
The petitioner, Nagesh Corporation, filed a Special Civil Application seeking relief against the Gujarat Urban Development Department and others. The petitioner later instructed counsel to withdraw the writ petition, preferring to approach the respondent authority directly for redress of grievances. …
Shanabhai Konabhai Parmar filed an appeal against the Deputy Executive Engineer but failed to file it within the prescribed period. The applicant sought condonation of the delay, citing that similar delays had been condoned in companion appeals. The respondent, represented by an Additional …
Bhikhabhai Javanbhai Maliwad filed an appeal against the Deputy Executive Engineer but failed to file it within the prescribed period. The applicant sought condonation of the delay, citing that similar delays had been condoned in companion appeals. The respondent, represented by an Additional …
Vaghbhai Haribhai Maliwad filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a order of the Deputy Executive Engineer. The appeal was filed beyond the prescribed period, and the applicant argued that similar delays had been condoned in companion appeals. The …
The petitioners, represented by Mr. Kamlesh S. Kotai, failed to appear before the Gujarat High Court despite multiple adjournments. The respondents, including Mr. Utkarsh Sharma (AGP), Ms. Roopal R. Patel, and others, were present and ready to proceed. The court noted the petitioners' non‑appearance …
The State of Gujarat filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 179‑day delay in filing an appeal. The applicants were represented by Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Vaishnavi Verma. The respondents were represented by counsel Mr. H.S. Munshaw, Mr. M.B. Parikh and Mr. H.J. Karathiya. The …
The High Court of Gujarat listed a large number of pending civil applications and appeals involving the parties Nirav Merambhai Dangar and Niharikaben @ Diku Harsurbhai Gagiya. An office note dated 19-02-2026 indicated that the required office objections had not been removed within the prescribed …
The petitioner sought an order directing the State Election Commission to include her name in the electoral roll of Ward No. 4, Sabarmati, so she could vote in the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation elections. Her name was absent from the Legislative Assembly constituency roll, which forms the basis …
The employee, Amitkumar Ghoricha, was appointed as an Assistant Librarian on a contract in 2020, which was repeatedly extended until July 2025. He filed a Special Civil Application seeking regularisation, arguing that after five years of service he was entitled to be made a permanent employee. The …
Manishkumar Pravinbhai Padaya filed Special Civil Applications No. 5202/2026 and No. 5424/2026 against the State of Gujarat seeking the removal of certain office objections. The High Court of Gujarat, after hearing the matter, directed that all such objections be removed on or before 8 May 2026. The …
The petitioner filed a special civil application challenging the reservation allocation made by the Election Commission in a revised preliminary order dated 12 March 2026. The petitioner had filed objections to the original preliminary order on 3 and 5 March 2026 but made no objections or …
Ishwarbhai Narsengbhai Parmar filed a writ petition challenging the State Election Commission's final notification reserving a District Panchayat seat in Vav‑Tharad for a Scheduled Caste woman. The petitioner argued that the earlier draft notification of 25‑Feb‑2026 already allocated the seat to a …
The appellant, accused No.2 in a multi‑state heroin smuggling case investigated by the NIA under the NDPS Act, has been in judicial custody for over 7½ years since his arrest in August 2018. The Sessions Court refused regular bail, prompting an appeal under Section 21 of the NIA Act. The High Court …
Tillana Shripal Shah filed a habeas corpus petition seeking the return of her son, Shriyan, from India to Canada, asserting that she is the legal custodian per an Ontario court order. The father, Shripal Shreyaskumar Shah, had taken the child to India in December 2025 without the mother’s consent, …
The State of Gujarat filed a Letters Patent Appeal (No. 751 of 2016) and a connected civil application for a stay. The respondent, Jatin Premesh Pandya, had died during the COVID pandemic, but the exact date of death was unknown. The appellant argued that the legal heirs had not been brought on …
Parmit @ Parmitbhai was detained under a preventive detention order dated 01‑02‑2026 issued by the Surat Commissioner of Police under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, on the ground that he was a "dangerous person" whose conduct threatened public order. The …
Hussain Khatri was preventively detained on 23/01/2026 by the Surat Police Commissioner under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, on the ground that his bootlegging activities threatened public order. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his …
The petitioner, Smit@Sumit Satishbhai Darji, was preventively detained on 1 February 2026 under Section 2(g) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as an "immoral traffic offender" and lodged a petition challenging the order. The petitioner argued that the detaining authority …
Tirath Lalbahadur Maurya filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 challenging a detention order dated 03.02.2026 issued by the Surat Police Commissioner under Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, on the ground that he was a "bootlegger". The petitioner argued …
Bhikhabhai Zalabhai Bharwad was preventively detained on 13‑02‑2026 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, alleged to be a "dangerous person" based on three criminal cases. He challenged the detention, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to …
The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Bahuda Vrundavan Shahu & others, seeking service of bailable warrants against respondents No.1 to 3. The Court granted the State a three‑week period to furnish the correct addresses for service of the warrants. It clarified that failure to …
Mr. Dhanraj Savairam Raj was detained as a "bootlegger" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 by a police order dated 17‑02‑2026. He challenged the detention through a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, arguing that no material showed any disturbance …
Arjun, detained as a "dangerous person" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, challenged the preventive detention order dated 10‑01‑2026. The petitioner argued that no material was placed before the authority to show that his conduct disturbed public order, and that the …
Raj Harish Thakor, detained as a "bootlegger" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, challenged the detention order dated 02‑02‑2026 before the Gujarat High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The petitioner argued that no material showed any disturbance …
Pratik Chimanbhai Vasava filed a special criminal application seeking a writ of habeas corpus to compel the State of Gujarat to produce his wife, the alleged corpus, before the court. The respondents submitted a statement from the wife indicating that she had voluntarily left to her uncle's …
Yash @ Sanjaybhai Ishwarbhai Sankabhai Desai was preventively detained on 23 January 2026 by the District Magistrate, Patan under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He filed a petition challenging the order, arguing that no material …
Pankajkumar was preventively detained on 13 January 2026 by the Surat Police Commissioner under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, on the ground that his bootlegging activities threatened public order. He challenged the order through a special criminal …
Kiran @ Bhikho Umedbhai Solanki was preventively detained on 17 September 2025 by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". The petitioner challenged the order, arguing that no material was placed …
Champaben Pravinbhai Jadav was preventively detained on 21 January 2026 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". She challenged the detention through a petition filed by her nephew, arguing that the detaining authority had no material …
Firoz @ Salim Hasambhai Shaikh was preventively detained on 13 January 2026 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his daughter, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to …
Arjunsingh Kirpalsingh Sardar was preventively detained on 17 January 2026 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his father, arguing that the detaining authority had no material …
The petitioner, Ashokkum... Lalvani, challenged a preventive detention order dated 24‑08‑2023 issued by the Commissioner of Police under the 1985 Act, alleging that his alleged bootlegging offences under the Prohibition Act did not threaten public order. The State argued that the petitioner was a …
Arjun @ Sunny Punambhai Marvadi was preventively detained on 15 January 2026 by the Police Commissioner, Vadodara, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his wife, arguing that no material was placed …
The petitioner, Rameshchandra Ramlal Kakhujulaha, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 challenging a detention order dated 10‑01‑2026 that labeled him a “bootlegger” under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He argued that the detaining authority had no …
Vijaybhai Ramshibhai Cudasama was preventively detained on 1 January 2026 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his uncle, arguing that the detaining authority had no material showing …
Kaif @ Kallu was preventively detained on 30-12-2025 as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The detainee, through his brother, challenged the order alleging no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the order was …
Mohsin @ Height Rafikbhai Ansari was preventively detained on 9 December 2025 by the Police Commissioner of Vadodara under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. The detainee, through his father, challenged the order, arguing that no …
The High Court of Gujarat examined a petition filed by the wife of Niteshbhai, who had been preventively detained on 6 January 2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger." The petitioner argued that the detaining authority had no material showing that his …
Irfan @ Nadi was detained on 31‑12‑2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He filed a petition through his mother challenging the legality of the detention, arguing that no material showed any …
Nilofar, wife of Imran Husainbhai Saiyed, was preventively detained on 17‑12‑2025 under Section 2(bbb) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "cruel person". She challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the detention …
Anilbhai Jethabhai Pangad was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 by the District Magistrate of Bhavnagar under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, on the ground that his boot‑legging activities threatened public order. He challenged the detention through a …
The petitioner, Sanjaybhai Rameshchandra Madiyar, filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that his daughter Hiral Madiyar was illegally confined by a man named Karan (the fourth respondent). The court examined affidavits and an investigation report from the Anti‑Human Trafficking Unit, which showed …
The Court heard a special criminal application filed by Pravin @Dhudho Manaji Thakor against the State of Gujarat. The applicant’s counsel, Ms. Ritixa P. Zala, sought relief regarding office objections. The Court directed that the office objections be removed within two weeks of the order, failing …
Mer Vishalbhai Mukeshbhai filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that his live‑in partner, 19‑year‑old Jadav Rinaben Kanubhai, had been illegally detained by her parents. The petitioner asserted that both parties, being adults, have a constitutional right to cohabit voluntarily. The corpus …
The petitioner, Narendra Kumar (through his mother), challenged a preventive detention order dated 23‑06‑2025 issued by the District Magistrate under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, alleging he was a bootlegger. The petitioner argued that no material was …
The petitioner, Govindbhai S/o Sajanbhai Bharvad, filed a special criminal application challenging his detention before the High Court of Gujarat. During the pendency of the petition, the Board reviewing the detention order revoked that order, effectively releasing the petitioner. The petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Juberbeg, filed a special criminal application challenging his detention. While the petition was pending, the Board revoked the order of detention that formed the basis of the petition. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the revocation rendered the petition moot. The Court examined …
The State of Gujarat filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 256‑day delay in filing its criminal appeal against Manoj Kumar @ Bhathi Bhagvanbhai @ Bhagubhai Padhiar. The appellant argued that the delay was justified and pleaded for relief. The learned counsel for the …
Mayank @ Montu, the petitioner, filed a Special Criminal Application before the Gujarat High Court seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioner, through Advocate Ms. Naynavati S. Jethva, requested the court's leave to withdraw. The respondent State of Gujarat, represented by …
The petitioner, Jitendrakumar @ Jitu Chikki Jethanand Ramchandani, filed a special criminal application challenging his detention order. The respondent, Police Commissioner of Ahmedabad, was represented by the Public Prosecutor. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the detention order had been …
Vishal Naginbhai Dantani was preventively detained on 5 December 2025 by the Police Commissioner of Ahmedabad under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c). He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his mother, arguing that …
Vijaybhai Govindbhai Nathabhai Ravat filed a Special Criminal Application before the Gujarat High Court seeking relief against the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad. The petitioner, through counsel, later applied for permission to withdraw the petition. The Court examined the request and, finding no …
Mahendrasinh @ Mohanlal Lakhmansinh Vadansinh Sisodiya was preventively detained on 13 December 2025 by the Ahmedabad Police Commissioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a “bootlegger”. He challenged the detention through a petition, arguing that the authority had …
The petitioner, Rashminkumar, filed a special criminal application challenging his detention. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner was released from custody. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that, in view of the release, the petition had become infructuous. The Court recorded …
The petitioner, Karman Raiyabhai Kodiatar, filed a special criminal application seeking relief, presumably to prevent his detention under the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities (PASA) Act. The Additional Public Prosecutor informed the court that there was no current proposal to invoke the PASA Act …
The petitioner, Lakhman @ Malik Jivabhai Maru, filed a special criminal application seeking a direction that the State invoke the Prevention of Anti‑Social Activities (PASA) Act and detain him. The Additional Public Prosecutor informed the Court that there was no proposal to invoke the PASA Act …
Ilaba, the petitioner, filed a Special Criminal Application before the Gujarat High Court seeking relief against detention under the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities (PASA) Act. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, informed the Court that there was no current proposal to …
Parbar @ Pabo Rajubhai Kodiyatar filed a special criminal application seeking the court's direction to invoke the provisions of the PASA Act and order his detention. The Additional Public Prosecutor informed the court that there was no current proposal to invoke the PASA Act against the petitioner. …
The petitioner, Prakash Bhuneswer (also known as Sunil Bullur Thakur), filed a Special Criminal Application seeking relief against detention under the Prevention of Anti‑Social Activities (PASA) Act. The Additional Public Prosecutor informed the Court that there was no proposal to invoke the PASA …
