Created by Fuzzy Cloud

N V RAMANA

221 judgments · newest first · showing 201–221

GANPAT SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2017 INSC 956Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ganpat Singh, was convicted for the murder of Shantabai, whose body was discovered in a dry well and identified as the mother of a minor. The trial court relied on circumstantial evidence: the deceased was last seen with the appellant, silver ornaments allegedly lent to her were …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusAVINASH

2017 INSC 871Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal appeal against Avinash, who had been arrested in connection with a fraud involving Rs 2.74 crore. While on bail, Avinash’s bank accounts were attached under Section 102 of the CrPC. He first sought to quash the FIR and have his accounts de‑frozen before a …

RAMATHALversusMARUTHATHAL & ORS.

2017 INSC 790Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant (buyer) entered into a sale agreement where the seller was obliged to conduct a survey of the land before payment was due. The seller failed to conduct the survey, prompting the buyer to sue for specific performance. The trial court and the first appellate court both decreed specific …

SURESH CHANDRA JANAversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

2017 INSC 1296Disposed off

The victim, Saraswati Guchhait, was allegedly raped by Purnendu Kumar Patra and later, while the rape case was pending, Patra and Rabin Jana threw acid on her. She was taken to a hospital, where she could not file a police complaint herself; a neighbour (PW‑7) wrote her statement and mailed it, …

MAHENDRA SUBHASHBHAI VANKHEDEversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ETC.

2017 INSC 716Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a 19‑year‑old male, was convicted under Sections 363, 366 and 376 IPC for kidnapping and raping a girl who was under sixteen. The girl had voluntarily left her home and stayed with the appellant for about ten days, and the sexual intercourse was described as consensual. The trial …

LAHU SHRIRANG GATKALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ORS.

2017 INSC 629Appeal(s) allowed

Lahu Shrirang Gatkal, a constable, was detained on 10 October 2016 under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981, by the Commissioner of Police, but the order failed to specify the period of detention. He challenged the order, and the High Court dismissed his …

PADMINI MAHENDRABHAI GADDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2017 INSC 622Matter referred to larger bench

The appellant, Padmini Mahendrabhai Gadda, was convicted under Section 201 of the IPC for causing disappearance of evidence and giving false information to screen the offender in a murder case, while being acquitted of the murder charge itself. The trial court sentenced her to two years' rigorous …

S. SUBBULAXMIversusKUMARASAMY & ORS.

2017 INSC 592Dismissed

The case arose from a land dispute between closely related parties in which Subramani was killed during a violent altercation on 15 September 1994. The trial court convicted Kumarasamy and two others under Sections 34, 302 and 506(11) of the Indian Penal Code, but the Madras High Court set aside the …

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusSMT. KALLO BAI

2017 INSC 1287Dismissed

In State of Madhya Pradesh v. Kallo Bai, the owner of a tractor and trolley used to transport teak without a permit was seized and a confiscation order was made under Section 15 of the Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyam) Adhiniyam, 1969. The lower courts held that confiscation could not occur …

BIBI PARWANA KHATOON @ PARWANA KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2017 INSC 442Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, Tamkinat Ara, was allegedly burned to death by her husband and several in‑laws. The trial court convicted the husband, father‑in‑law, sister‑in‑law (Bibi Parwana Khatoon) and her husband (Md. Hasan) under IPC s.304B read with s.34, sentencing them to imprisonment. On appeal, the High …

BALIRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2017 INSC 395Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Baliraj Singh and co‑accused were convicted for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC based on the testimony of three eyewitnesses who were relatives of the deceased and on a post‑mortem report indicating a fatal wound caused by a sharp object. The Supreme Court found serious …

KANAKARAJAN @ KANAKANversusSTATE OF KERALA

2017 INSC 377Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a night-time religious procession at a temple where nine accused allegedly attacked the deceased Rajesh and the complainant Vinod (PW2), leading to Rajesh's death. One of the accused, A-2, was found dead hanging from a tree the next day, and the remaining eight were charged under …

THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.versusAMIT KUMAR @ BACHCHA RAL

2017 INSC 374Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar appealed against the Patna High Court's order granting conditional bail to Amit Kumar, the principal of Vishnu Rai College, who was alleged to be the king‑pin of the "Bihar Toppers Scam" involving tampering of answer sheets, illegal firearms, and large sums of cash and property. …

DEVENDRA NATH SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P.

2017 INSC 316Dismissed

Devendra Nath Srivastava was convicted by a trial court for murdering his wife after assaulting her with a brick, resulting in her death by asphyxia due to multiple ante‑mortem injuries. The trial court sentenced him to death under Section 302 IPC. On appeal, the Allahabad High Court set aside the …

KRISHNEGOWDA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA BY ARKALGUD POLICE

2017 INSC 276Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved an alleged unlawful assembly in which members of two rival groups clashed, resulting in the death of a farmer, Channegowda. The accused were convicted by the Karnataka High Court on charges including murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and assault (Sec. 324 IPC) despite the trial court’s …

PAWAN @ RAJINDER SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2017 INSC 216Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Pawan @ Rajinder Singh and Ajit @ Dara Singh, were convicted of murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and, for Ajit, of an offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act, based largely on the testimony of two chance witnesses who claimed to have heard an altercation and a gunshot. …

M. G. ESHWARAPPA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2017 INSC 198Dismissed

The State of Karnataka prosecuted four relatives of the complainant for offences under Sections 506, 354 and 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the fatal assault of Basavaraj. The trial court acquitted the accused, holding that the prosecution had not proved the case beyond reasonable doubt, …

N PARAMESWARAN UNNIversusG KANNAN AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 194Disposed off

The appellant, N. Parameswaran Unni, presented two cheques drawn by the first respondent, G. Kannan, which were returned unpaid and received a bank intimation on 8 April 1991. He issued a statutory notice by registered post on 12 April 1991, which was returned marked "addressee absent," and a second …

BHAGWATI @ REENAversusANIL CHOUBEY

2017 INSC 196Disposed off

The husband filed a suit seeking annulment of his marriage, alleging that he was forced to marry the wife under threat, that the marriage was not consummated willingly, and that the wife was under 18 at the time of marriage. The trial court held the wife was a minor, declared the marriage void ab …

CHAIRMAN, ODISHA JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONversusJASOBANTA NAYAK AND OTHERS

2016 INSC 55Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Jasobanta Nayak, secured rank 16871 in the general category and rank 80 in the physically challenged category in the 2012 Odisha Joint Entrance Examination for engineering admission. He submitted a disability certificate from the District Hospital stating a 40% visual impairment, …