Created by Fuzzy Cloud

NAND PRABHA SHUKLA

199 judgments · newest first · showing 1–199

RAMESH CHANDRA SHUKLA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 20‑11‑2019 issued by the Additional Session Judge, Special Judge (Gangster Act), Fatehpur, in a case arising under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster Act. The High Court …

JITENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Judicial Magistrate's order dated 16‑04‑2019 in a criminal case (State vs. Praja Ram) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

YUSUF KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quash of a charge‑sheet dated 15‑07‑2019 and the entire criminal proceeding (Special Case No. 73 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 452, 352, 504, 506 and 307 IPC. Both parties appeared before the Additional District and …

MOHAMMAD NAZISH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute, which included charges under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506, 377, 313, 354, the Dowry Prohibition Act (sections 3 and 4) and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights …

RAJEEV URF SANJEEV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 17‑03‑2025 and the cognizance and summoning order dated 26‑11‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 2516 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS. The High Court …

JITENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 10‑11‑2021 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun, in a case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High …

SAURABH KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the proceedings of Case No. 31977 of 2025, which arose from a criminal case against Mahesh Chandra and others. The applicant alleged that the magistrate had treated the matter as a complaint, issued a notice under …

SANJAY KUMAR SHASHTRI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sanjay Kumar Shashtri and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking execution of a decree. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application because possession of the …

DHARMENDRA CHAUHAN @ DHARMENDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 15‑12‑2024 and the accompanying summons in Criminal Case No.1163 of 2020, which arose from FIR No.562 of 2024 alleging offences under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS Act, 2023. The …

MOHD KALAM AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohd Kalam and four others, were charged under Sections 191(1), 115(2), 352 and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code in a criminal case filed by the State of U.P. They filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, the summoning …

RAVI SHANKAR PATEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ravi Shankar Patel and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 08‑03‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 15‑04‑2026 in a case where they were charged under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 110 of the BNS, …

DINESH NAYAK AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Dinesh Nayak and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑02‑2026 and the subsequent trial in Case No. 391 of 2026, alleging that the alleged offences arose from mob violence and that the injuries were …

DEVENDRA ALIAS CHHOTEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Devendra alias Chhotey filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the chargesheet No. 159/2024 and the cognizance order dated 3‑Feb‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 587 of 2025. The High Court examined the record and observed that, at the pleading stage, it could not conclude …

RIYAZ MOHAMMAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 131 of 2026) initiated against them. The High Court examined the material and observed that the existence of an offence against the applicants could not be dismissed at …

SHEKHAR ANAND AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings arising from a charge sheet dated 23.08.2025 and a cognizance order dated 21.11.2025 in Criminal Case No. 441 of 2025. They alleged that they were falsely implicated in a …

DHARM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 17 OTHERS

The applicant, Dharm Singh, lodged an FIR on 13 November 2018 alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The investigating officer filed a charge‑sheet on 29 June 2019 omitting Section 307 and instead including Section 323. The applicant sought, through an application …

VIMLESH TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vimlesh Tiwari, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 28328 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 352, 504, 506 IPC and Section 7 of the Criminal Law …

VIPIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Vipin Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nayaya Sanhita seeking to quash the proceedings in a POCSO case (Complaint No. 144/2025, K v. Vipin) pending before a Special Judge. The High Court examined the material and observed that at this stage it could not be …

VED PRAKASH KAUSHIKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ved Prakash Kaushik, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant, through counsel Anil Pratap Singh, sought to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a fresh petition if needed. The court …

BIRENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The applicant, Birendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. After the matter was listed, counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. The court considered the …

VISHNU SIKARWAR @ SHISHUPAL SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Vishnu Sikarwar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summoning order dated 24‑07‑2024 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 16636 of 2023) under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Protection of Women …

JAMAL AKHTARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jamal Akhtar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 17‑April‑2010 and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 10745 of 2010) arising from offences under Sections 324, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant alleged false implication, …

RAMANAND AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No. 557 of 2025, which arose from a case of alleged offences under various IPC sections. The applicants argued that they were falsely implicated and that the proceedings constituted an abuse of process, …

MASROOR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants Masroor and Maqsud were convicted under Sections 308 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to three years of rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court observed that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and Sections 360 and 361 of the Code of …

GANGA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ganga Yadav filed a criminal appeal (No. 2567 of 1988) against the State of Uttar Pradesh in the Allahabad High Court. The appellant's counsel was Haridwar Singh and Janardan Yadav, while the State was represented by the Advocate General. No appearance was made by the appellant, and the State's …

NARAIN DASversusSTATE OF U.P.

Narain Das filed a criminal appeal (No. 2136 of 1983) against the State of U.P. No counsel appeared on his behalf. The State was represented by A.G.A. An office report dated 30‑04‑2026 confirmed that the sole appellant, Narain Das, died on 06‑09‑2025. Under established legal principles, the death of …

NAJAMA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 62 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 147, 452, 323 and 506 IPC. The parties had entered into a settlement on 28 July 2025, which was verified and reported to the …

FAIZ ALI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 15‑01‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 18‑02‑2026 in a criminal case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑III, Amroha. The High Court examined the material and observed …

SEEMA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Seema Devi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Sessions Trial No. 758/2021, which involved offences under IPC sections 427, 504, 506, 341 and the SC/ST Act. The parties had reached a full settlement, with the opposite party returning a …

MUKHTIYAR AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mukhtiyar and others, filed an application under section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking relief. Their counsel later requested to withdraw the application, seeking liberty to re‑file with better particulars. The Hon'ble Justice Nand Prabha Shukla dismissed the application as withdrawn, …

NOORUL HASAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Noorul Hasan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicants submitted that the application had become infructuous. The court considered the submission and found no merit in proceeding with the application. …

MAHESH KUMAR BHARDWAJ ALIAS MAHESH BHARDWAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Mahesh Kumar Bhardwaj filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking quash of the charge sheet and the pending criminal trial (Session Trial No. 53 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 74, 75(1)(i) of the B.N.S. Act and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. …

JAY PRAKASH SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 10806 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court examined the material and held that, on the …

SMT SAVITRI DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Smt Savitri Devi and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 13‑07‑2022 and the charge sheet dated 22‑12‑2021 in Crime No. 591 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 352 and 324 of the Indian …

KULDEEP BAGHELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Kuldeep Baghel, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 19243 of 2022) and the accompanying charge sheet and cognizance order relating to offences under Sections 323, 324, 352, 506 and 308 of the IPC. The High Court …

RAM KUMAR GAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ram Kumar Gaur, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 25‑09‑2018 in State vs Ram Kumar Gaur (Case No. 2391/1995) and to stay the pending criminal proceeding (Case Crime No. 693D of 1992) under Section 420 IPC. The High …

SHIV SHANKAR CHAUDHARY AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the proceedings in Criminal Case No. 204 of 2026. The High Court examined the material and observed that, at the pleading stage, it could not be said that no offence was made …

MANOJ RAI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a summoning order dated 09.10.2024 and to stay the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 26698 of 2024, which involved charges under Sections 3(5), 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. The High Court examined …

CHAUDHARY FATEH SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Chaudhary Fateh Singh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 575 of 2019) initiated under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that the FIR contained false allegations and that, …

HARSH PATEL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Harsh Patel and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance and summoning order dated 06‑07‑2024 in a criminal case (No. 55342 of 2024) that alleged offences under Sections 420, 406 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. They …

ARVIND AND 5 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.240 of 2017, which involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST Act. The parties had reached a full settlement, which was verified by the …

RAM AUTARversusSTATE

Ram Autar appealed a criminal conviction, but before the appeal could be heard he died, as reported in an office note dated 08‑07‑2026. The State, represented by the Advocate General, appeared before the court. The sole appellant's death raised the question of whether the appeal could continue. The …

MOHD ALIM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 76 of 2025) that involved offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both parties appeared before the civil court, …

CHHABI LAL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chhabi Lal Yadav, a contract District Consultant for the Swachh Bharat Mission, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Crime No. 539 of 2019) filed against him under IPC sections 419, 420 and 409. He alleged that the embezzlement charges …

MUNSHI RAM AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings against them and to be allowed to appear through counsel before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Moradabad. The court examined the material and found that the …

SATNAM SINGH @ SATTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Satnam Singh @ Satta filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 17‑09‑2024 and the ensuing criminal proceedings (Case No. 3529/2025) for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The High Court examined the material …

DHANANJAY MISHRA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Dhananjay Mishra and others seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, charge sheet and cognizance in State vs Shashi Prakash and others. The court examined the material and concluded that the facts on …

REYAZ AHMAD MATHANJIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Reyaz Ahmad Mathanji, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 28‑02‑2025 and the summoning order dated 03‑04‑2025 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, in a case registered as Crime No. 0066 of 2025 under Sections 308(2) and …

VANSH PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vansh Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order, and proceedings in a criminal case arising from FIR allegations under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2) and 352. The applicant argued that the FIR was based on false …

MERAJ @ MERAJ BANGALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Meraj Bangali, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings pending before the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) III/Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar (Case No. 7681 of 2026) arising from charges under IPC sections 115(2), 351(3), …

NETRALPAL SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal case (State v. Ashish & Others) and the cognizance order dated 02.02.2026. The court examined the record and observed that the dispute revolves around questions of fact and that no …

ANUP @ ANUP PRASAD AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 09.01.2026 and the cognizance order dated 20.02.2026 in Criminal Case No. 491 of 2026, which arose from offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 333 of the Indian Penal …

SMT SUNITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Sunita Devi, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. Act seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 951/2026) and the related charge sheet and cognizance order. The High Court examined the material and observed that the dispute centered on questions …

VISHESH GARG AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Sessions Court judgment dated 11‑12‑2025 and a Chief Judicial Magistrate order dated 06‑05‑2025 relating to offences under Sections 307, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The High Court examined the material …

MOMIN @ CHHOTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Momin @ Chhotu filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant’s counsel argued that the application had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The counsel for the second opposite party raised no objection to this submission. The court, after …

PEERA PRADHAN @ MATLOOB ALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Peera Pradhan and another seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 18‑04‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 11‑07‑2024 in a criminal case under Sections 504 and 506 IPC. The court examined the material …

HASIM ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Hasim Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 24‑07‑2022 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 3060 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. The High Court examined …

HRIDAY NARAYAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16‑01‑2023 in Crime No. 578 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. The High Court examined the material and observed that the dispute …

DEVENDRA KUMAR SOLANKI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Devendra Kumar Solanki and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 592/2026) instituted by the State of U.P. arising out of Crime No. 123/2025 under Sections 76, 78, 115(2) and 352 of the IPC. …

DEVENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Devendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 709 of 2026) filed against him under IPC sections 324(4), 352 and 351(2). The High Court examined the record and observed that the material on file …

SHASHANK @ SHASHANK PURI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 7638/2025, which involved offences under Sections 323, 325 and 506 of the IPC arising from a personal dispute. The parties had entered into a …

SURENDRA PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet and entire proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 420 and 409 IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a full compromise. Both parties, including the …

RAJU YADAV AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, a group of farmers, were implicated in an alleged assault at a sugar mill based on a FIR lodged a day after the incident, despite no injuries, no victim complaint, and no direct evidence linking them to the alleged offences. They filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS …

MOHAN SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and all proceedings arising from a case under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The parties had reached a full settlement, which …

GEETA PAL AND 9 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and the entire criminal trial (Special Session Trial No. 853 of 2023) relating to offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) …

VARIS ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal case (State v. Varis and others) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise dated …

BHANU ALIAS MANU ALIAS RISHABH CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Bhanu alias Manu alias Rishabh Chaurasiya, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Crime No. 0132 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 354, 323, 504, 506, 376 of the IPC and …

PAWAN THAKURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pawan Thakur, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a stay and quash of the criminal case (Crime No. 0090) pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, which involved offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 406, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the …

RAM KISHAN RAIKWAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 352, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They argued that the matrimonial …

K.U.M.S.versusSABBIR AHMAD

The appellant K.U.M.S. filed a criminal appeal against respondent Sabbir Ahmad. No counsel appeared for the appellant and the respondent's counsel was also absent, though the State's counsel was present. A compliance affidavit submitted by the SP of Bijnor indicated that the respondent had died on 6 …

AMAN SHARMA AND 5 ORSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1766 of 2017) involving Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute arose from a matrimonial disagreement and the parties had …

AMANDEEP SINGH ALIAS SONU SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 23876 of 2023) arising from an FIR and charge‑sheet under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504 and the Dowry Prohibition Act (sections 3 and 4). The dispute was matrimonial in nature and the …

CHANDO AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 6908200 of 2018) arising under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by …

ANSHUL VERMA @ ASHISH VERMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 428 of 2018) arising under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence Act. They claimed that the parties had amicably settled …

ANWAR KAMAL @ KAMAL AHMAD AND 5 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 7637 of 2023, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging a matrimonial dispute. The parties had entered into a …

PANKAJ KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute arose from matrimonial discord and the parties had reached a full …

RAMESH @ GOLU AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 22414 of 2024) instituted by the State of U.P. for offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354-A, 427 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court …

SHAMSHEED AHMAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 1347 of 2025) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad. The court examined the record and found that the material on file did …

BRIJESH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 69913 of 2024) arising from a matrimonial dispute that they claim has been resolved by compromise. The court examined the record and observed that the …

POKHPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pokhpal, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to set aside an order dated 13 January 2026 passed by the Special Judge (E.C. Act) in Aligarh, which had rejected his earlier application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The impugned order arose …

DILIP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Dilip Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 25203 of 2024) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh against Surjeet and others under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 506 and 341. The High Court …

DEVESH KANAUJIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Devesh Kanaujia, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 4674 of 2012) arising from a 2007 case under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties, including the complainant Mamta …

ANKUR BANERJEEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ankur Banerjee, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 871/2022) arising from allegations under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, on the ground that the …

RAJARSHI DUBEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 496 of 2022) arising from FIR No. 0572 of 2020 that alleged offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The dispute was matrimonial in …

RAJAT AND 3 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 29 February 2022 and a charge‑sheet (No. 19 of 2021) filed under Sections 498A, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in a criminal …

NISHANT SINGH @ SONU SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 10665 of 2024) arising from alleged offences under sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. They argued that a compromise dated 27‑02‑2026 had been …

RAMVEER SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal case No. 15/IX/2025, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a matrimonial dispute. The parties had entered into a voluntary compromise …

AMAN ALIAS AMAN SENGAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 570 of 2025) arising from a matrimonial dispute, on the ground that the parties had entered into a genuine settlement dated 29‑08‑2025, which was verified by the lower court. The …

SUNIL SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the cognizance order, summons and notice of charge in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court …

HEMANT SIROHI AND AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS against the State of U.P. and another party. Counsel for the applicants, Rahul Kumar Tyagi, moved before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that the application be withdrawn. The court considered whether a pending application …

ABDUL SATTAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Abdul Sattar and four others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 102078 of 2025) arising from Crime No. 19 of 2025 and a summoning order dated 18.08.2025. They contended that the proceedings were abusive of process …

RASHID AKHTARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rashid Akhtar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 02‑Nov‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 09‑Jul‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 32256 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 79B of the BNSS and Section …

KALUVA SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 780 of 2025) arising from allegations under IPC sections 498A and 323 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute stemmed from a matrimonial conflict that had been referred to the Court's …

SEEMA KUSHWAHA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Seema Kushwaha and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. The State of Uttar Pradesh and another party were impleaded as respondents. Counsel for the petitioners, Ram Sheel Sharma, appeared before the …

SMT ARCHANA TIWARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Smt. Archana Tiwari and another, filed a recall application under Section 528 of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act seeking to set aside an order dated 13‑04‑2026 that had dismissed their earlier application. The High Court recalled that order and restored the application to its …

AKASH TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akash Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (State Vs. Akash Tiwari) filed under sections relating to dowry harassment and other offences. The court examined the material and held that, at the interlocutory stage, it could not be …

HAJI ABDUL RASHEED ANSARI AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 75458 of 2023) arising from alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 506, 354 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that a compromise deed dated …

PRASHANT PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 856 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354 of the IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act and related charges. The High Court examined the record and held that at this …

NAIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Naim, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 117/9 of 2017) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Section 376‑D IPC and related offences, as well as to set aside the charge‑sheet and a …

SARVESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, including the charge sheet and summons, in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the …

JAMSHED AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and related proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 324 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants …

SMT SAVITA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, sister‑in‑law of the informant, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 18‑May‑2018 issued in a criminal case (Crime No.99 of 2014) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …

SALEEM AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 52800 of 2024) arising from alleged offences under IPC sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 325, 354 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute was matrimonial in nature and the parties …

CHHOTU AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 10‑10‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 07‑03‑2024 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that …

SMT BHARTI @ MEENA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 12582 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that a compromise had been reached …

ARPIT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Chargesheet No. 383/2025 and cognizance order) in a case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that the …

VIVEK AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of a charge sheet and summons in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a …

SHASHANK SHARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 7037 of 2019, which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 452, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that a compromise had been reached on …

VIKAS AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act) on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a compromise dated 06‑04‑2026. The …

RAHUL CHHABRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rahul Chhabra and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 66500 of 2024) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, alleging that the parties had amicably settled the dispute via a compromise …

SAROJ DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Saroj Devi, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 5 March 2022 and the charge sheet dated 13 June 2021 in Crime No. 0314 of 2021, which alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

MUKESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the proceedings in State v. Mukesh Kumar (Case No. 2978 of 2023) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑III, Ghaziabad. They contended that the cognizance order dated 09‑11‑2023 was …

SONI KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Soni Kumari, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 44796 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The opposite parties raised a preliminary objection that an appeal under Section 14-A had already been filed against the impugned order. The …

SHIVAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shivam and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 26042 of 2022, which stemmed from a FIR alleging offences under Sections 498A, 323, 377, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached a mutual settlement on 14 …

VIPIN ALIAS SHIVAM CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Vipin Chauhan and another, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to set aside a September 2025 order of the Additional Sessions Judge that had rejected their request, under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to recall and re‑examine three witnesses. The High …

VIKAS AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summons order dated 14.08.2025 and the entire criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 2958 of 2025, which arose from a matrimonial dispute involving alleged offences under Sections 85 and 115(2) of the BNS and …

VISHAL VERMA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 100076 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 342, 354, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

HARSHVARDHAN SINGH AWANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Harshvardhan Singh Awana filed an application under section 528 of the B.N.S.S. before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition with more detailed particulars. The court considered the request and found no …

GOPAL PRASAD GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash charge‑sheet No. 1019 of 2018 in State v. Gopal Prasad Goswami and others, which alleged offences under various IPC and IT Act provisions. The High Court examined the material and held that, at the …

JYOTIDEVI JIYALAL PATEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 3461/2025) arising from a charge sheet under Sections 108 BNSS and 3/4 of the D.P. Act, and to stay the cognizance order dated 23.10.2025. The applicants contended that they had no …

MANDHEER NISHAD AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mandheer Nishad and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants expressed a desire to withdraw the application while retaining the right to file a fresh petition. The …

PIYUSH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Piyush Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant, through counsel Mehul Khare, sought to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a fresh application with more detailed particulars and pleadings. The …

AMIT KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 19279 of 2024) that involved offences under the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a matrimonial dispute. The parties had earlier settled the dispute through mediation at the …

VIJAY AND 2 ORSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 23372 of 2018) filed under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506. They asserted that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a compromise dated 2 …

ANSAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 181 of 2024) arising from matrimonial disputes involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 354 IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. …

SHAHMOON ALIAS MOHAMMAD SHAHMOONversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 6073 of 2012) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute through a compromise dated 21‑02‑2026. The …

SAYEED ANJUMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sayeed Anjum, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order, and all proceedings in Criminal Case No. 4137 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352 of the B.N.S., provisions of the D.P. Act and the Muslim …

DEEPANSHU MISHRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 16178 of 2020) on the ground that they had reached a compromise dated 19‑12‑2025. The State opposed, contending that the trial court must first verify the existence and terms of any …

NOOR JAHAANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Noor Jahaan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a Sessions Court order that rejected his Section 311 CrPC application to recall a material witness, Dr. Nitin Sharma, who performed the post‑mortem in a 498A, 304‑B and Dowry Prohibition Act case. The …

ANKUR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 4843 of 2021) on the ground that they had amicably settled the dispute by a compromise dated 20‑04‑2026. The State opposed, contending that the trial court must first verify the …

SUMIT SAINI @ SUMIT AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and related criminal proceedings on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a compromise dated 17‑03‑2026. The State opposed, contending that the trial court must first verify …

SAURABH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Saurabh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order dated 30 September 2024 and 19 December 2024 respectively, which alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. …

RAVINDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ravindra Kumar appealed his conviction and three‑year rigorous imprisonment under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. He sought release on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, arguing that the offence carried a maximum sentence of two years and that he had no …

KRISHNA PAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

Krishna Pal and Mahendra Pal were convicted by a Sessions Court for offences under IPC sections 323 and 324 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and a fine. They appealed under Section 374 CrPC, contending that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and Section 360 …

MOHD JAMEERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohd Jameer, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑10, Kanpur. He asserted that the dispute with the State had been settled by a compromise dated …

ASRAF ALI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 23‑08‑2021 and a cognizance order dated 27‑10‑2021 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the …

DILSHAD AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings and charge sheets arising from a case under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, claiming that the parties had settled their dispute by compromise. The State …

MOHD AASIM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 4952 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the …

HIMANSHU DUBEY @ OMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Himanshu Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute involving charges under Sections 498A, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant claimed that the parties had amicably settled …

MOHD SALEEM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 488 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act. They claimed that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a compromise …

SOM PAL SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE

The appellants appealed their conviction and sentences under Sections 304 and 323 IPC, arguing that the trial record was lost and could not be reconstructed. The High Court examined the provisions of Sections 384, 385 and 386 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which require perusal of the record before …

RAJENDRA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appeal challenged the conviction of six accused under IPC sections 323, 147 and 452, of which only two appellants (Indra Pal and Surendra alias Sunder) remained alive. The trial court sentenced them to six months, one year and two years of rigorous imprisonment respectively but failed to …

DR VINOD KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dr. Vinod Kumar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 22‑10‑2025 that had committed his criminal case to the Court of Session. The order was made by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur, under Section 323 of the Criminal Procedure Code, …

SHIVAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shivam and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.41 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that the dispute had …

MUKESH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mukesh, the sole surviving appellant, was convicted under Sections 324 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment. He appealed the conviction, contending that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and the corresponding provisions of the …

MUKARRAM @ RINKU AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal trial (Session Trial No. 1486 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 376, 511, 377 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that a compromise …

DEEPAK KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Deepak Kumar and four others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 19‑06‑2025 and a summons dated 10‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 3030 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and …

CHANDRABHAN SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Domestic Violence Protection Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled …

AKASH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash the charge sheet, summons and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No. 6559 of 2024) arising from a matrimonial dispute involving offences under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry …

AVANISH DVIVEDI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from charges under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a compromise dated …

NEERAJ BHARDWAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Neeraj Bhardwaj, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 27‑02‑2025, the cognizance and summoning orders dated 09‑01‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 2390 of 2026) relating to offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, …

MOHSIN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No. 641 of 2026, alleging that the parties had amicably settled the dispute through a compromise dated 20‑02‑2026. The charge‑sheet alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2) of the BNSS, Sections 3 …

CHATRAPAL SAINI AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summons and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 949/2023) arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence Act. They claimed that the …

SHAHBAZ AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (Case No. 17316 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and provisions of the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Marriage Act. …

SANOVAR KHAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 354, 323 IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Marriage) Act, on the ground …

SMT. VIMLA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, mother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law of the accused woman, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 21000 of 2024, which arose from an FIR under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …

DEEPAK KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash criminal case No. 754 of 2020, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a matrimonial dispute. The parties had reached a full …

ASHISH NAGAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order issued by the Judicial Magistrate in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that the parties had …

ANURAG DUBE AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498-A, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that a compromise had been reached with the first …

SHIVAM PRAJAPATI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a dowry‑related criminal case on the ground that a compromise had been reached between the parties. The High Court noted that verification of any compromise is within the …

VARUN GAUTAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise. …

DEVRAJ PRAJAPATI AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 20‑04‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 14‑08‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 106309 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 498‑A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of …

SUNIL KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 15256 of 2025) instituted by the State of U.P. for offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506, 354 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The High Court …

PARAS @ ANKUR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case arising from alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 313, 323, 324, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached a …

ARUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Arun Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 03.01.2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 09 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The High Court examined …

OMPAL SAINI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 926 of 2016) arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had settled the …

SAKIR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash a summons and charge sheet in a criminal case under Section 498-A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the parties had settled the dispute by a compromise deed dated 11‑02‑2026. The respondents argued that the …

RISHABH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings arising from a charge sheet dated 31-10-2025 and an order taking cognizance dated 07-01-2026 under Section 69 of the B.N.S. and Section 4 of the D.P. Act. The High Court examined the …

DILIP KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking quash of Criminal Case No. 935 of 2026, which arose from a matrimonial dispute and alleged offences under sections 85, 115(20), 152, 351 of the BNS Act and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The parties had earlier settled the …

RAMJAN MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ramjan Mohammad, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 29 July 2025 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi, which had been issued under Section 144 BNSS. The impugned order arose after the applicant …

ROHIT RAJAK @ SONUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summoning order and the criminal proceedings initiated under IPC sections 452, 323 and 504. The High Court examined the record and observed that the dispute revolves around factual issues that cannot be decided at …

ALOK YADAV @ ALOK KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Alok Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1840 of 2024) and a summoning order under Sections 420 and 323 of the IPC. The High Court examined the record and found that the allegations against the …

SHIV KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shiv Kumar Shukla filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 2482 of 2017) filed by Sunil Agrawal alleging offences under Sections 385 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The Allahabad High Court examined the record and held …

VINOD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summoning order dated 23.07.2019 and subsequent non-bailable warrant orders in a private complaint case (Cr. No. 1264 of 2018) involving offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The High …

RAM BAHADUR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ram Bahadur and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against them in a private complaint case involving offences under IPC sections 354-A, 323, 504 and 506. The High Court examined the …

MANISH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manish Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 15767 of 2024) filed against him under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court examined the record and observed that the existence of an offence against the …

GULAM SABIR AZADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Gulam Sabir Azad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Counsel for both parties appeared before the High Court, Allahabad. The court, at the request of the applicant's counsel, listed the matter afresh for 10 July 2026. An earlier interim order was …

ASIF ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Asif Ali, filed a supplementary affidavit on 4 November 2025 in the High Court of Allahabad. The court directed the registry to locate the affidavit and place it on record. The registry reported that no such affidavit was found in the records. The applicant’s counsel requested …

SUNNY DIVAKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sunny Divakar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1612 of 2022) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Khaga, which involved offences under Sections 323, 406, 356 and 506 of the IPC. The …

RAJJAN AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants were convicted in 1983 for offences under IPC sections 324, 148, 147, 323/149 and 324/149 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the Allahabad High Court examined whether the trial court should have exercised the discretion under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and …

SOBARAN SINGH AND OTHERversusSTATE

The appellants Sobaran Singh and others filed a criminal appeal against the State. No counsel appeared for the appellants, while the State was represented by the learned A.G.A. The court noted that appellant No.2, Ajab Singh, had died on 5 July 2022 as per an office report dated 17 March 2026. …

RADHEY SHYAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Radhey Shyam filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for him and the State was represented by A.G.A. The court’s office report dated 17‑03‑2026 revealed that the sole appellant had died about 22 years earlier. The court held that the death of the …

SMT MAMTA DAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt. Mamta Dagar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking recall of a criminal proceeding. The High Court heard the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State, issued a notice to the applicant, and directed that the matter be listed for further hearing …

PRABHAKAR RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Prabhakar Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a stay of an execution order dated 30‑10‑2025 issued by the Family Court, Azamgarh, for recovery of outstanding maintenance of Rs. 3,16,000. The parties had earlier been directed to mediation, resulting in a …

RAM JANAM PANDEYversusSTATE

The appellant Sri Ram Pandey was convicted under IPC sections 323 and 34 and sentenced to a fine of Rs 500 with six months’ rigorous imprisonment in default. The High Court noted that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and Sections 360 and 361 of the CrPC, which …

KHARAK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants Raghubir Singh and Surendra were convicted under IPC sections 323, 325 and 452 and sentenced to fines and two years of rigorous imprisonment. They appealed the conviction, arguing that the trial and appellate courts failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and the …

VISHNU DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vishnu Dwivedi filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The applicant was represented by counsel Jitendra Prasad Mishra and Prateek Srivastava, while the State was …

PANKAJ RAJPUT AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 1391 of 2024) filed against them under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 325 of the IPC. The High Court examined the material and observed that the existence of an offence could not be …

SANT RAM ALIAS SATYA RAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Sant Ram was convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment by the Additional Sessions Judge, Budaun. He appealed, contending that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, and the relevant provisions of the Code of …

OM PRAKASH RAJUTIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The applicant, Om Prakash Rajutiya, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to set aside an order dated 06‑11‑2025 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Jhansi, which had rejected his earlier application under Section 173(4) BNSS. The High Court examined whether the …

MOHD ARSHADversusState of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Dismissed on merits

The applicant, Mohd Arshad, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The applicant’s counsel, Santosh Kumar Singh, later submitted that the application had become infructuous and should be dismissed. …

SANJAY KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 08.04.2016 and the related criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 9738 of 2015 under Section 323 IPC) as well as a non‑bailable warrant dated 20.11.2025. The court noted that the non‑bailable …

VINOD KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Vinod Kumar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside an order dated 16 May 2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in a trial concerning offences under Sections 452, 307, 506, 34 and 120B of the IPC. The court noted …