Created by Fuzzy Cloud

NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE

82 judgments · newest first · showing 1–82

SUSHMA SURESHKUMAR RAOversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Sushma Sureshkumar Rao, filed a bail application in the High Court of Bombay. After the charge-sheet was filed in the underlying criminal case, the applicant sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending bail application and to file a fresh bail application before the trial …

Benjamin Anand AshadeversusThe State of Maharashtra

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Benjamin Anand Ashade, filed a criminal application seeking cancellation of his bail. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant requested permission to withdraw the application, citing the court's reluctance to grant relief. The bench, presided over by Justice Dr. Neela Gokhale, …

SAINATH EKNATH SAVARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, aged 19 at the time of the alleged incident, was charged under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Sections 4, 6 and 8 for allegedly assaulting a minor in a toilet. The victim later testified that no incident occurred, claiming family pressure, while the applicant's wife, an alleged eyewitness, …

ANUJ KESHWANI S/O SANJAY KESHWANIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, a businessman engaged in Airbnb services, sought modification of two bail conditions imposed by the trial court – fortnightly attendance before the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) and surrender of his passport. He argued that he had complied with all existing conditions, that charges …

BANOO NUSSERWANJI CAMA AND ORSversusBRIHANMUMBAI MAHANAGAR PALIKA AND ANR

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioners failed to appear before the High Court on two consecutive dates despite the matter being listed. The court noted that the petitioners appeared unwilling to prosecute the writ petition. Consequently, the court treated the petition as withdrawn. No substantive arguments or evidence …

RAMRATAN SUKHLAL BHARTIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The applicant, Ramratan Sukhlal Bharti, filed a bail application which was scheduled for hearing on 20 September 2025 and again on 13 February 2026, but he failed to appear on both occasions. The court observed that the applicant did not demonstrate any interest in pursuing the bail application. …

SANJAY KALAPPA MHETREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The applicant, Sanjay Kalappa Mhetre, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant failed to appear on the scheduled dates of 11 November 2025 and 30 January 2026, and again did not appear when the matter was called out. The court observed that the applicant appeared …

RASHITH ANSAR BASHAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Rashith Ansar Basha filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. His counsel, Mr. Shashikant Jagtap, sought the court's permission to withdraw that application and to file a fresh one before the trial court. The issue before the court was whether the applicant could be allowed to withdraw …

KUNAL RAJKISHOR PANDEYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The applicant, Kunal Rajkishor Pandey, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing on 12 June 2025, 20 August 2025, 12 December 2025, and 6 February 2026. The court noted that the applicant also did not appear when the matter was called on the date of …

TAMIL SELVAN MARIMUTTU HARIJANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The applicant, Tamil Selvan Marimuttu Harijan, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court. The applicant's counsel sought a copy of the victim's statement under Section 164 of the CrPC and a time extension, but the applicant failed to appear on multiple dates. The State's counsel submitted a …

ALIASGAR SAIFUDDIN RAMPURWALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Aliasgar Saifuddin Rampurwala, was arrested on 17 November 2023 after police recovered 640 bottles of cough syrup alleged to contain codeine phosphate, leading to charges under the NDPS Act and the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The applicant’s bail plea before the Special NDPS Judge was …

PRASAD PANDURANG PADIYAR AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, husband and mother‑in‑law, sought quashing of FIR No.136 of 2005 and the accompanying charge‑sheet filed after a matrimonial dispute that led to a divorce decree in 2009. The husband had earlier obtained a decree of divorce under Section 12(1)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, …

Anuj Sanjay KeshwaniversusThe Union of India

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Anuj Sanjay Keshwani, filed a criminal application (No. 22 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The applicant's counsel identified typographical errors in the prayer clause of the application and requested permission to withdraw the present application while retaining …

ANJURAKHATUN FAZUL REHMAN FAKIRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Anjurakhatun Fazul Rehman Fakir applied for bail in a case involving alleged violations of Sections 3 and 4 of the Passport Act, 1920 and Sections 13, 14A and 14B of the Foreigners Act, 1946. The State indicated that the charges were framed and only nine witnesses would be examined, with the next …

SIKHA YADAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Sikha Yadav, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court. The State counsel informed the court that the charge-sheet had already been filed in the trial court on 22 January 2026. The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh …

Rajendra K VaniyarversusThe State of Maharashtra

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Rajendra K. Vaniyar, filed a bail application in the High Court of Bombay which was initially rejected by the trial court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. C.G. Jadhav, after hearing that the court was not inclined to grant bail, sought permission to withdraw the bail application while …

AMIT MADHUKAR PAWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, accused No.3 in a murder case under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, sought bail after being incarcerated for over six months. The incident involved a white car driven by co‑accused Santosh Pawar, who repeatedly ran over the victim, resulting in death. The applicant was alleged only to …

AMINA B IBRAHIM KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

Amina B Ibrahim Khan was arrested on 27 August 2025 after police intercepted her on a train and recovered 15.594 kg of Ganja from her bags, invoking Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act and Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Her bail application was rejected by the Special …

SABERA B RAHIM KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Sabera B Rahim Khan, was arrested on 27 August 2025 after police recovered 17.329 kilograms of Ganja from her bags on a train. She filed a bail application before the Special NDPS Judge, which was rejected, prompting her to seek enlargement of bail before the Bombay High Court. The …

YOGESH ANDRESH AMOLIKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Yogesh Andresh Amolik, was arrested on 13 March 2025 after police found him with approximately 1 kg 10 g of charas during a patrol. He claimed the weight included the zip‑lock bag, reducing the actual drug quantity to an intermediate level, and argued that he had been in custody for …

SUNIL BIRARAM BISHNOIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Partly Allowed

The applicant, Sunil Biraram Bishnoi, filed an interim application seeking modification of a bail condition imposed on 29 January 2026, which required a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with one or two local sureties. The court, after hearing counsel for both parties, agreed to modify the wording of the …

MOHD SADDAM HUSSAIN SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Mohd Saddam Hussain Shaikh, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh application after six months if the trial does not progress substantially. The court, not …

PRASHANT KUMAR NAYAKversusTHE UNION OF INDIA

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, accused No.3 in a narcotics case, was arrested after co-accused statements linked him to a shipment of 48 kg of ganja intercepted from a bus traveling from Odisha to Mumbai. No contraband was recovered from the applicant and the Special Judge had denied bail. The applicant argued lack …

VISHAL RAMESH MADERIYAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Vishal Ramesh Maderiya, sought bail for offences under Sections 376, 376(D), 376(2)(n), 343 and 506 IPC relating to an alleged rape and intimidation of a married woman. The victim claimed a consensual relationship with the applicant, which turned hostile when he refused to marry her, …

LILU PRADHAN @ NILU SUHAS PRADHANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, accused No.4 in a narcotics case involving 48 kg of ganja seized from a bus, was arrested based on statements of co‑accused but no contraband or incriminating material was recovered from him or his premises. He has been in custody for over a year without charges being framed. The …

NIJAMUDDIN NISAR KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Nijamuddin Nisar Khan, was arrested as Accused No.4 in a narcotics case involving alleged possession and sale of Mephedrone, based solely on statements of co‑accused and alleged bank credits from an absconding co‑accused. No contraband was recovered from him and charges had not yet …

ABHISHEK PRAMOD GARGversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Abhishek Pramod Garg, was arrested under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged rape, stemming from a consensual relationship that later ended when he refused to marry the complainant. The complainant filed an FIR after the breakup and later indicated willingness …

Amritlal Devichand JainversusCentral Bureau of Investigation ACB,Mumbai

Disposed Off

The applicant, Amritlal Devichand Jain, filed an application in the Bombay High Court seeking relaxation of Condition No. 4, which barred him from leaving India without court permission, imposed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in 2022. The respondents, CBI and ACB, opposed the …

VISHAL SAMPAT SONAWANE @ KALUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The applicant, Vishal Sampat Sonawane, filed an interim application seeking restoration of bail after a prior bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution because he did not appear on 10 December 2025. The court scheduled a hearing for the restoration application, but the applicant again …

RANJIT LAXMAN TANPUREversusINTELLIGENCE OFFICER AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Ranjit Laxman Tanpure, filed an interim application seeking relaxation of the reporting conditions imposed on his bail. The original order required him to report to the DRI Mumbai once a month, which was later modified to reporting on trial dates. Observing that a co‑accused was …

JAGDISH B. AHUJAversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER AND ANR

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Jagdish B. Ahuja filed a writ petition (No. 2921 of 2013) against the Municipal Corporation of Greater. No counsel appeared for the petitioner. A rule was issued on 4 February 2014, and an office report dated 6 February 2026 indicated that the amendment ordered on that date had not been carried out. …

INDRESH KUMR SHITLA PRASAD JAYANTRIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Indresh Kumr Shitla Prasad Jayantri, filed Bail Application No. 2666 of 2024 before the High Court of Bombay. The respondent, State of Maharashtra, opposed the bail. An interim application was filed seeking relief regarding the bail application. The Court, after considering the …

BHARAT NANUBHAI SHIROYAversusPINAL BHARAT SHIROYA

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Bharat Nanubhai Shiroya, filed Contempt Petition No.163 of 2021 in the High Court of Bombay. On the scheduled date of 9 January 2026, no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Subsequent adjournments also saw the petitioner’s continued non‑appearance, indicating a …

AKHTAR IQBAL SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Akhtar Iqbal Shaikh, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application after the judge indicated an inclination not to grant relief. The court considered whether it could permit the withdrawal. The judge …

HARSHA RAMA RAOversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Harsha Rama Rao filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra informed the Court that the charge-sheet would be filed before the trial court on or before 17 February 2026. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the pending bail application and to file a …

NILESH CHANGDEV BANKAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Balram Namdev Toke filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Vinod Kashid, after hearing the matter, sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh application before the trial court. The bench, presided over by Justice …

BALA GANAPATI VENKATA PERU NAIDU PENTAKOTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Bala Ganapati Venkata Peru Naidu Pentakota, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court. The respondent Union of India and others opposed the application, and the State Public Prosecutor filed an affidavit in reply. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail …

SWAPNIL PUNDLIK MADHAVIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Swapnil Pundlik Madhavi, was arrested in connection with a murder (IPC s.302 read with s.34) allegedly committed by a group of five accused. The prosecution alleged that the victim's wife and her co-accused conspired to kill the victim, and the applicant was identified by the victim's …

SHAHBAJ MEHBOOB KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Shahbaj Mehboob Khan applied for bail before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra, through counsel, informed that the charge-sheet would be filed within 15 days. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail petition …

NABALA EDITH D/O BATE LAWRENCEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Nabala Edith, filed a bail application in a criminal case where she has been in custody since October 2023 and charges were framed in January 2025. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application, citing that a co-accused's bail application had been allowed …

SUNDAY CHUKWADI EDEHversusUNION OFINDIAN AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Sunday Chukwudi Edeh, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The prosecution indicated that two witnesses had already been examined and about ten more would be examined, with the …

ISHA SURESH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Isha Suresh Chauhan filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Edgar Briganza, sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh application after charges are framed or after six months, whichever is earlier. The court, …

OKECHUKWU OKEKE LINUSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Okechukwu Okeke Linus, filed a bail application while in custody since 12 April 2024. Counsel for the applicant sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court, after hearing, granted permission to withdraw and disposed of the bail application as withdrawn. …

VIJAYKANT MOTILAL KOTHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The complainant alleged that a partner firm and its partners issued a cheque to discharge a hand loan taken by a third party, which later bounced, leading to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court convicted the accused, but the Additional Sessions Court …

ASMA DASTAGIR SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Asma Dastagir Shaikh, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant was represented by Mr. Anil Bansode, while the State of Maharashtra was represented by Ms. Anuja S. Gotad. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant requested that the bail application be …

SHOAIB RAFIULLAH KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Shoaib Rafiullah Khan, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court. The State informed the Court that the charge-sheet had been filed before the Trial Court on 12 January 2026. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh …

KARTIK SANJAY BEMBDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Kartik Sanjay Bembde, was arrested for alleged forgery of orders purportedly issued by the Revenue Minister, charged under Sections 318(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338 and 238 r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He sought bail after a lower court rejected his earlier application. …

LOGANATHAN MUTHUKUMARANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Loganathan Muthukumaran, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant, Mr. Karthik Rajasekhar (with Arif Sayed), sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh application after one year if …

SHAHEEN MOHAMMED ASLAM MANIHARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

Shaheen Mohammed Aslam Manihar applied for bail in a case (C.R.No.297 of 2025) involving alleged assault, disrobing, hair cutting and bodily injury of the complainant under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR details a financial dispute that escalated to the alleged …

AJAY TRIVENI CHAUHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Ajay Triveni Chauhan, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court. The State counsel informed the court that the charge-sheet would be filed on or before 3 February 2026. On that basis, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the present bail application and to …

MOHAMMAD KHALID MUKHTAR AHMED SHIAKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Mohammad Khalid Mukhtar Ahmed Shaikh, was granted bail on 7 February 2023 with a condition prohibiting him from entering Bhiwandi taluka and the jurisdiction of Padgha Police Station until trial completion, except to attend scheduled court or police matters. He sought permission to …

HEMANT JAYANTIBHAI PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Hemant Jayantibhai Patel, was arrested as accused No.19 in a drug‑related case involving 26 persons, based solely on statements of co‑accused and a witness that he facilitated a cash transfer of Rs.30 lakh as an Angadia. No narcotic contraband or other material linking him to the …

RANI DURAIRAJ PERINABAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered the bail application of Rani Durairaj Perinaba, accused of offences under Sections 420, 409, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC for forging documents to obtain an overdraft loan. The applicant had been denied bail by the Judicial Magistrate, while all co‑accused, including …

HUSSEIN MUZAFAR RAJANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Hussein Muzafar Rajani, filed a bail application (No. 2454 of 2021) before the Bombay High Court. During the interim hearing, the State counsel informed the court that the prosecution would not examine any witness and the matter was fixed for final hearing on 21 January 2026. The …

SOMA SUNDARAM MAYAVAN ARJUNversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court of Bombay, on 13 January 2026, considered an interim application filed by the applicant, who had been granted bail on 16 July 2025 with a condition to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 backed by sureties. The applicant’s counsel argued that the applicant’s relatives could not find …

SOHEL GAFFAR MAHIDAversusUnion of India

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Sohel Gaffar Mahida, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court. He later sought the court's permission to withdraw that bail application. The learned counsel for the applicant, Aryan Kotwal, made the request. The court, after considering the request, granted permission to …

MADHUKAR PANDURANG KAJALEversusMANGESH CHITLE AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Madhukar Pandurang Kajale, filed writ petitions (Nos. 560 and 559 of 2014) challenging the prosecution of public servants in a private complaint. The central issue was whether prior sanction is required to prosecute public servants under such complaints, a question that was pending …

MRS MANDAKINI ARUN JANGAMversusMR ARUN DIGAMBAR JANGAM AND ANR

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Mandakini Arjun Jangam filed a civil appeal (First Appeal No. 675 of 2015) in the High Court of Bombay against Arun Digambar Jangam and another. The matter was listed but no counsel or parties appeared on either side. The appeal had been pending since 2015 without any prosecution. Justice Shivkumar …

DEEPAK KUMAR DHULICHAND JAINversusTHE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, a 65‑year‑old chartered accountant, was arrested in connection with a alleged ponzi scheme where his son and co‑accused solicited deposits from the public promising high returns. The prosecution alleges that the applicant encouraged investors, allowed the …

ANBURAJ AMMASI KULLANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, a 65‑year‑old chartered accountant, was arrested in connection with a alleged ponzi scheme where his son and co‑accused solicited deposits from the public promising high returns. The prosecution alleges that the applicant encouraged investors, allowed the …

PARVEJ JANMOHOMMED GAURIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …

RASHMIN LABHSHANKER TRIVEDIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …

ABHIJIT HIRAMAN GARUDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …

ANAND BARDHAN GAUTAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …

DEVENDRA KISHOR VERMAversusTHE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …

CHETAN JANABHAU BOMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …

SUJIT KUMAR PATNAIKversusTHE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …

SHAIKH SAJID HUSSAINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …

DEEPAK KUMAR DHULICHAND JAINversusTHE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …

DEEPAK KUMAR DHULICHAND JAINversusTHE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …

DEEPAK KUMAR DHULICHAND JAINversusTHE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …

SUREKHA SAMDHAN KADAM AND ANRversusTHE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …

ASHDIN VIRAF BATLIWALAversusTHE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …

ANAS ASHFAQ SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL REJECTED

The applicant, Anas Ashfaq Shaikh, has been in custody since 26 September 2023. An earlier bail application was withdrawn by order of the High Court on 26 June 2025, after the trial court rejected his bail on the ground that the defence had caused delays. The applicant filed a fresh bail application …

SUVARNA SUDHIR KUMBHAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Suvarna Sudhir Kumbhare, was charged under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for the alleged murder of her husband, whose post‑mortem indicated injuries suggestive of asphyxia. The prosecution’s case relied on the deceased’s sister’s testimony and the post‑mortem …

DIVESH SANTOSHI SUTARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Divesh Santosh Sutar, an 18‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with the murder of Abhishek Singh under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that six accused and a juvenile assaulted the deceased, leading to his death, and that the …

RUKSAR AHEMAD HUSAIN BARBHIYA @ RUKSAR AWAIS KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Ruksar Ahemad Husain Barbhiya, was arrested under the NDPS Act based solely on the statement of a co‑accused, Hafizullah Khan, who alleged she dealt in heroin. No narcotic substances were recovered from her person or premises, and the prosecution’s case rests on that testimony. The …

SHAHID IBRAHIM SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Shahid Ibrahim Shaikh filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. After hearing, the learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Gautam T. Kanchanpurkar, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court, after considering the request, granted permission to withdraw. …