Created by Fuzzy Cloud

NEERAJ TIWARI

66 judgments · newest first · showing 1–66

SUNIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sunil Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments, unauthorized structures and blockages of a public drain in Trans Yamuna Colony, Agra, alleging overflow and unsanitary conditions. He claimed the municipal authority had not acted on his grievance. The …

VANSH PUNDIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vansh Pundir, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Registrar of Birth and Death, Nagar Nigam Saharanpur, to cancel his birth certificate which incorrectly recorded his date of birth. He alleged that his earlier representation dated 2 August 2023 for cancellation was …

VINOD KANTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinod Kant, sought a writ of certiorari to quash an order dated 05‑09‑2025 that withdrew his personal Gunner Security, and a writ of mandamus to compel the State to restore the security. He alleged that the court had failed to consider an intelligence report dated 29‑10‑2022 …

SUDHIR KUMAR TIWARI AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Sudhir Kumar Tiwari and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that, due to subsequent developments, the petition had become infructuous. The respondents did not object to this submission. The …

ANAND PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Anand Prakash filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Arpit Malviya, submitted that the petition had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The respondents' counsel, Anil Kumar Singh Baghel, did not oppose this …

SYED ABBAS MURTAZA SHAMSIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Syed Abbas Murtaza Shamsi filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 15‑04‑2026 issued by the Municipal Commissioner under Section 331(1)(2) of the U.P. Nagar Mahapalika Adhiniyam, seeking demolition of his house. He contended that the notice was invalid because the inspection …

JAVED IQBALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Javed Iqbal filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 15‑04‑2026 issued under Section 331(1)(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1959, which sought demolition of his house in Varanasi. He sought certiorari to quash the notice and mandamus to restrain the authorities from …

SMT. SHAHIDA BANO AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Shahida Bano and another filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under Section 331(1)(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 and seeking a mandamus to stop demolition of their house in Varanasi. The petitioners argued that the notice was unlawful and that the demolition …

DAYA SHANKAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Daya Shankar Tiwari filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel certain respondents to dispossess other occupants from his house and to restrain entry under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, and also to direct the District Magistrate, Deoria to …

SABIR ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sabir Ali filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and another respondent. The petition raised factual disputes that the court found could not be verified on the pleadings. The judges held that because the essential facts were in dispute, the …

MOHAMMAD NIYAMAT ALI KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohammad Niyamat Ali Khan filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the Varanasi Development Authority under Section 27 of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 and another notice under Section 331(1)(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1959. The …

SUDHIR KUMAR TIWARI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 16‑04‑2026 that demanded a reply within three days for the cancellation of a lease agreement intended to last for thirty years. They contended that no legal provision permits such a short notice period for terminating a long‑term lease …

JAVED ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Javed Alam filed a writ petition seeking the quashal of a notice dated 23‑04‑2026 and a mandamus directing the respondents to refrain from any coercive or demolition action concerning his house at Chowk, Varanasi. The respondents produced an instruction dated 30‑04‑2026 and an inspection …

SMT. SUBHADRA DEVI @ SAHODHRA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Subhadra Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Aligarh to consider and decide a representation she had submitted on 20 June 2024, which remained pending. The petitioner alleged undue delay and requested the court to compel the …

YATENDRA KUMAR JAISWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Yatendra Kumar Jaiswal and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents not to install an electricity transformer on the gate of their residence and to compel the Collector, Chandauli (respondent No. 2) to decide a …

ANKUR YADAVversusSMT. RINKY YADAV

Ankur Yadav filed a first appeal against Smt. Rinky Yadav in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant, Anwar Ali, informed the court that the appellant no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. The respondent's counsel did not object to this request. The court, noting the …

SUNIL MUSADDIversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sunil Musaddi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nagar Palika Parishad, Mirzapur to demolish the Musaddi Dharmshala, which was deemed dilapidated, and also requested police protection for the demolition. The petition relied on a notice dated 09-10-2025 issued by …

ANIL KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anil Kumar Gupta, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2 and No.3 (State of U.P. and others) to pay his pending dues with interest and to close the agreement. He alleged that a representation he filed on 4 March 2022 before respondent No.3 remained …

ADITYA PRASAD SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aditya Prasad Sonkar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to decide his representations dated 10 October 2025 and 23 March 2026 within a reasonable time. He alleged that despite multiple representations, the authorities had not …

M/S S.S. ENTERPRISES AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, M/s S.S. Enterprises and another, filed a writ petition alleging that the Municipal Commissioner of Nagar Nigam, Bareilly had failed to pay them the full amount due under a work order dated 25‑08‑2021 for construction of a CC road and drainage. They claimed a total liability of …

THE METHODIST CHURCH IN INDIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Methodist Church in India filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Respondents 2 and 3 objected that the petition was filed in the name of the Church without establishing that it is a legal entity capable of suing. The petitioner’s counsel could not provide any documentation to …

DIGVIJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Digvijay Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 17684 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The respondent’s counsel, Ms. Vatsala, contended that the petitioner was not the aggrieved party and that the …

RAMESH CHANDRA KESARWANI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash demolition notices dated 13‑02‑2026 issued by the Executive Officer of Nagar Panchayat Mauaima and a mandamus directing the authorities not to proceed with demolition. The petitioners had already submitted their objections to the …

SUNIL PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sunil Pal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to decide his representation dated 12-03-2026, which was pending before them. The petition alleged that the respondents had failed to act on his representation. The Court observed that the …

SITA RAM AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sita Ram Agarwal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Executive Officer, Sirsa, to consider and decide a representation dated 03‑06‑2026 that had not been acted upon. The petitioner alleged undue delay in the decision of his representation and requested the Court …

ISHWAR SARAN SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate of Mau to examine and decide their representation dated 29 September 2022 in light of a Government Order dated 14 June 2024 issued by the Special Secretary, U.P. Government. The High Court, after hearing counsel, …

MOHD TARIQ SIDDIQUI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Mohd Tariq Siddiqui and another challenged a notice dated 10.04.2026 issued by the Executive Engineer, Nagar Nigam, Bareilly, which directed removal of alleged encroachment without granting a hearing. They also sought a mandamus to prevent demolition of their construction, which was …

KHAN SAJEDA BIBI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged a notice dated 21‑04‑2026 that demanded they produce documents concerning land in Gata No. 169 and threatened to deem their possession illegal if they failed to comply. The petitioners had filed a reply on 25‑04‑2026 raising objections, but the respondents proceeded to …

MERAJUL HASAN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Merajul Hasan and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to consider a representation dated 06-04-2026 and pass a reasoned order after hearing. The petitioner alleged that no decision had been taken on the representation. The Court examined the petition …

DILIP KUMAR SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dilip Kumar Sonkar, challenged a government order that increased his contribution for a security guard from 10% to 50% of the guard's cost, demanding payment of Rs. 4,11,927 for six months. He argued that his annual income of Rs. 6,12,830 made the amount unaffordable and that the …

MAYANK SHYAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quashing of two public notices and mandamus directing the respondent to follow a 2020 notification and grant rooftop permission for a private building. Respondent No.2 produced an order dated 23.04.2026 showing that the tender in question had already …

M/S SAMVEDNA DEVELOPMENT SOCIETYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/s Samvedna Development Society, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The respondents argued that the agreement dated 01.03.2024 contained an arbitration clause, making the writ petition …

LAKHILALversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Additional District Officer of District Panchayat Mathura to (i) extend the one‑year allotment of agricultural land allotted through public auction, (ii) compensate for a five‑month loss due to delayed possession, and (iii) decide a …

GOPICHANDRA SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Gopichandra Srivastava filed a writ petition seeking to quash a demolition notice dated 08‑09‑2025 and an eviction notice dated 09‑03‑2026, alleging that the demolition notice was issued without a hearing and violated natural justice. He also prayed for mandamus to restrain demolition and …

TASLEEMversusState of UP AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Tasleem filed Writ Petition No. 22067 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petition was argued by counsel Irshad Ahmad and Navin Kumar Srivastava. Respondents were represented by Aditiya Kumar Singh, …

ATIKURRAHMANversusState of UP AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Atikurrahman, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 05‑09‑2024 passed by respondent No. 4 concerning permission to run a local Tuesday market. The petitioner argued for a direction to allow filing a fresh representation before respondent No. 4 and for a …

VIJAY NARAYAN MISHRAversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

Vijay Narayan Mishra, the petitioner, sought an order for an electricity connection to a house/shop he occupies, while the respondent Gulab Devi Jaiswal claims ownership and has a pending suit for permanent injunction. The court examined the inspection report, which confirmed that Mishra is in …

DURGA BUX SINGH and 3 ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. THRU COLLECTOR BAHRAICH and 2 ORS.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Durga Bux Singh and three others filed a writ petition (C No. 3000132 of 2002) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh through the Collector, Bahraich, and two other respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners and no request …

M/S HAMARA PUMP NASIRPUR HPC PETROL PUMPversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, M/S Hamara Pump Nasirpur Hpc Petrol Pump, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner filed a withdrawal application stating that the cause of action no longer survived and it no longer wished to pursue the writ. The Court examined the …

RAMCHANDAR PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

Ramchandar Pal filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking mandamus to protect his life and liberty and to compel the District Magistrate of Mirzapur to decide an application dated 17‑12‑2025. The State of Uttar Pradesh contended that the dispute was private in nature and that the …

RAM BHARAT @ RAM BHARAT SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing certain respondents to refrain from interfering with his peaceful possession of a 0.44 hectare plot of land in Ghazipur and to take action against other private respondents. The State's standing counsel objected, contending that the matter was a …

VINAY KUMAR JAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinay Kumar Jain, sought mandamus directing the police not to interfere with his brick‑kiln business and to expedite a representation filed on 07‑11‑2025. He alleged that a partner, Smt. Rita Jain, with her brother’s collusion, was obstructing his business, filing false FIRs, locking …

BRAHMCHARINI DR. REKHA JAINversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Dr. Rekha Jain filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chairperson of the Uttar Pradesh State Commission for Women to decide a representation filed on 01‑09‑2025. The petitioner alleged that despite filing the representation, no decision had been taken, causing undue delay. …

RAKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rakesk Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition concerned a matter that was pending the outcome of the Bar Council of India election, which was expected to conclude in about six months. Respondent No.2, through counsel, informed the Court that the …

DEEPAK YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deepak Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Sub‑Registrar of Bareilly to register a will deed dated 22‑07‑2021 and to decide pending applications filed on 05‑12‑2023 and 24‑12‑2025. The petitioner alleged that despite filing a representation on 24‑12‑2025, no …

PRAMOD KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar Tiwari, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondents to act on his application dated 22-12-2025 and to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on his land, also seeking compensation for damages. The State argued that the dispute was private and …

RUKMESH GUPTA AND 23 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of 24 individuals, filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 11 September 2012 and 24 December 2025/19 January 2026 that denied them a refund of premium money deposited with the Nagar Palika Parishad Tilhar. They sought a certiorari to quash those orders and directed …

AMAN MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Aman Mishra filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel argued that there were mistakes in the way the respondents were listed (the array of respondents). The court examined the claim and found that the procedural defect …

SHAHANSHAH HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Shahanshah Husain filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 8506 of 2026) seeking a mandamus directing the Executive Officer of Nagar Palika Parishad, Khalilabad (respondent No. 4) to pay him a security deposit of Rs. 75,000 with interest. The petitioner claimed he was entitled to the security for a shop …

THE JANTA TRUCK HONORS WELFARE SOCIETYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The Janta Truck Honors Welfare Society filed a writ petition challenging a land patta that had been cancelled by an order dated 23 July 2024 in Case No. 314 of 2024. The cancellation was affirmed by the Commissioner in Appeal No. 1976 of 2024 on 5 May 2025. The petitioner argued that the …

ISHWAR CHANDRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to restrain the respondents from demolishing a disputed parcel of land and to compel Respondent No.4 to decide the petitioners' reply filed earlier. The petitioners alleged that no decision had been taken on their reply, causing prejudice. The Court examined …

M/S RIYA CONSTRUCTION AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Riya Construction & others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide an application filed on 3 February 2026 and to ensure payment of the amount claimed. The petitioner alleged that despite filing the application, no decision had been taken, causing …

ALOK VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Alok Vishwakarma filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. While the petition was pending, a final order in the underlying matter was passed. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the final order …

MOHD NISHAT @ BILALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd Nishat @ Bilal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter that the court found could be addressed under Section 211 of the Uttar Pradesh Municipality Act, 1916. The respondent, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, argued that the appropriate …

SHYAM SINGH KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shyam Singh Kushwaha, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State and the Nagar Ayukt to (a) refrain from interfering with his peaceful possession of land in Mathura, (b) allow him to construct a tin shed on his shop premises, and (c) decide a representation he had …

SHAMIM AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Shamim Ahmad filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petition sought relief under writ jurisdiction. The Court examined the pleadings and observed that the dispute centered on factual issues that were …

OM PRAKASH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Om Prakash Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Alok Kumar Srivastava, expressed that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition. The court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw the …

SMT. SWATI CHADHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioners Smt. Swati Chadha and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Real Estate Regularity Bench No.3, Gautam Buddha Nagar, to decide their applications dated 09.12.2025 and 10.12.2025 and to fix an earlier hearing date instead of 27.02.2026. The respondents argued that …