Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

NISHA M THAKORE

12 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

AMIT MUKESHBHAI THAKKAR THRO MANISH DEVI PRASAD AGRAWALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Amit Mukeshbhai Thakkar was preventively detained on 14‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act pertained only to law and order, not public order as required by Section 3(4)

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusJAMNABEN WD/O SHANKARBHAI HALABHAI MACHHAR

98-DISPOSED AS ABATED

The National Insurance Company appealed a judgment awarding an insurance claim against the original claimants, including a deceased respondent (No. 6). The death of the respondent was proven by a death certificate dated 29‑11‑2018, and the insurer could not locate the heirs or legal representatives. The Court held that

SMIT KARIMBHAI DAREDIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

The petitioner, Smit Karimbhai Daredia, filed a habeas corpus petition alleging unlawful detention by the State of Gujarat. The corpus (the detained individual) had previously been in a live-in relationship with the petitioner but had terminated the relationship and expressly stated she did not wish to live with him. T

ALKESHJI ANARJI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

The husband filed a special criminal application (habeas corpus) seeking custody of his wife. The wife appeared before the High Court and expressly stated that she did not wish to accompany her husband. In view of her declaration, the petitioner's counsel chose not to press the petition and requested liberty to pursue

RONIL AMRUTBHAI CHANDRALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

The husband filed a special criminal application (habeas corpus) seeking custody of his wife. The wife was present before the court and expressly stated she did not wish to accompany her husband. In view of her declaration, the husband’s counsel chose not to press the petition and requested liberty to pursue any approp

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusLEGAL HEIRS OF DECD. HITESH POKIYA

44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

The case arose from a road accident on 1 November 2003 involving a heavy‑goods‑vehicle dumper whose driver held only a Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) licence and not a licence for transport vehicles. The deceased, aged 19, died and his parents filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, obtaining a awar

JAGDISH @ JAGGI RAMESHBHAI VASAVA THRO UMESHBHAI ARJUNBHAI VASAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner was preventively detained on 09‑04‑2026 by the Police Commissioner, Vadodara, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences under the Prohibition Law (Sections 65(E) and 116(B)) relate only to law and order

ABHAY S/O PANKAJBHAI RANA THRO PANKAJBHAI DHANSUKHLAL RANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Abhay, was preventively detained on 09‑04‑2026 by the Surat Police Commissioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences pertained only to law and order, not public order as required by Section 3(4) o

FALGUNIBEN NIKUNJBHAI RATHODversusNIKUNJBHAI LILADHARBHAI RATHOD

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant filed a first appeal 56 days after the decree, exceeding the prescribed period. The delay was attributed to the applicant's ill health and the need to care for her ailing parents. The applicant sought condonation of the delay, arguing that it was bona fide. The learned counsel reiterated these grounds bef

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search