Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
175 judgments · newest first · showing 1–175
Ajab Singh filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. While the appeal was pending, the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bulandshahr reported that the appellant had died. The court received the report on 25 August 2025 and, on 1 October 2026, held that the death of the sole appellant …
The appellant, Mangal Khan, filed a criminal appeal (No. 2125 of 1987) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a conviction. During the pendency of the appeal, the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Shahjahanpur reported on 27 August 2026 that the appellant had died. The court considered whether the …
The appellants Rais Pal and Sadhu Ram were convicted for murder and attempt to murder under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The prosecution relied on the consistent ocular testimony of three eyewitnesses, including an injured witness, and medical evidence that corroborated the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 09-11-2025 registered under Sections 319(2) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of …
The petitioners, Akram and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 02‑09‑2026 registered under sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima facie …
The petitioner, Sangeeta, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing police officials to conduct a fair investigation and arrest accused persons in a criminal case under various sections of the B.N.S. and D.P. Act. She relied on the Supreme Court’s observations in Sakiri Vasu v. State of …
Sudhir Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 14‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The Allahabad High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of …
Petitioner Mohit Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 07.07.2026 that alleged offences under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on …
The petitioner Veerpal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 02‑09‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 191(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie case of …
Chandani Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing police officials (respondents No.2 and 3) to conduct a prompt, proper and fair investigation in Crime No.120 of 2026 under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. and to complete it within the period prescribed by law. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 22 July 2026 that alleged offences under sections 329(3), 324(4), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State of …
Dr. Piyush filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a proper investigation in Crime No. 284 of 2026 under sections of the B.N.S. that correspond to IPC sections 420 and 120‑B. The Court examined the scope of Section 156(3) of the Criminal …
The petitioners challenged the registration of an FIR dated 02‑08‑2026 under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 109 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 & 4 of the D.P. Act, seeking its quash. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it prima facie disclosed the commission of offences, rendering the prayer to …
Petitioners Deepak Kumar and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 01.08.2026 registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court examined the FIR, …
Petitioners Hemant and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04‑09‑2026 registered under Sections 318(4) and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, …
Petitioners Sanjeev Kumar Gupta and another filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 12‑09‑2026 lodged in Crime No. 0610 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 506 and 387 IPC (criminal intimidation and attempt to murder). The Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima …
The petitioners, Ayub Khan and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 19‑08‑2026 (Case Crime No.176 of 2026) registered under sections 191(2), 78(2), 131 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it …
The petition filed by Shivam Prajapati sought quashing of an FIR dated 02‑09‑2026 registered under Sections 281 and 106(1) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer for quash …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 22.08.2026, registered under Section 74 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.) and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 09.07.2026 under Sections 351(3) and 316(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer to quash untenable. Relying on …
The appellant Chhotu Verma was convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC based largely on circumstantial evidence, including an alleged illicit relationship and motive, the recovery of an axe, and the presence of the victim's body in the house. The trial court relied on hostile statements from …
Petitioners Saiz Chand and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04-12-2025 that alleged offences under sections 351(3), 318(4), 352 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and section 66(D) of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000. The High …
Shravan Kumar Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police (respondent No.4) to conduct a fair investigation and submit a report under an FIR dated 19‑06‑2026. The petitioner relied on Section 137(2) of the B.N.S. and cited Supreme Court …
The petitioners, Khushi and another, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 under Section 137(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) alleging cognizable offences. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State of Telangana v. Habib …
The petitioners, Dharmendra Yadav and six others, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 8‑8‑2026 registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed …
Petitioners Ashraf Khan Chaudhary and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 17 July 2026, registered under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Mirzapur Police Station, Saharanpur. They contended that the FIR does …
The petitioners, Shahid Fakeer and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the registration of an FIR dated 29 July 2026, which alleged offences under several sections of the BNS. The FIR pertained to a cognizable offence recorded at …
Petitioners Pappu and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 20‑08‑2026 under Sections 115(2), 191(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima facie commission of offence, …
Petitioners Sitaram Maurya and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04.08.2026 under Section 305(a) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08.07.2026 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) alleging abduction of a minor. The alleged abductee was later recovered and, in a statement under Section 180 BNS, said she had voluntarily left her …
Petitioners Sandeep and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 09‑07‑2026 in Crime No.165, which alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The High Court …
Petitioners challenged the FIR dated 17-08-2026 in Crime No.227, which alleged offences under Sections 75, 191(2), 333, 115(2), 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The High Court examined the FIR and, finding a prima facie case of commission of …
The petitioner, Dilshad Qurashi @ Mallu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash a notice dated 20‑07‑2026 issued by the District Magistrate, Mau under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gunda Act, and a writ of mandamus to restrain any coercive action. The …
The petitioners, Om Narayan and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 18‑08‑2026 registered under sections 115(2), 191(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima facie …
Petitioners Zaid and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 17.05.2026, registered under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima facie commission of offence, citing Supreme Court precedents …
Petitioners Kasim Malik and eight others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 22‑07‑2026 in Crime No.0208 of 2026, which alleged offences under various sections of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the D.P. Act. The Court examined the FIR and held that …
Mahendra Singh Tyagi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police officers (Respondents No. 2 and 3) to conduct a fair investigation into Crime No. 307 of 2023 under various IPC sections. The petitioner argued that the investigation was unsatisfactory and that the High Court could …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 20.08.2026 that alleged violations of Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it prima facie disclosed the commission of an offence, citing Supreme Court precedents that …
Petitioner Jeeshan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 30 July 2026 registered under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State of Telangana v. Habib Abdullah …
Petitioners Ismail and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 30.07.2026 registered under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State of Telangana v. …
The petitioner, Kamran Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 16 July 2026 under Section 316(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) registered at Police Station Fareedpur, Bareilly. He contended that he was not responsible for the loss of certain records and …
The petitioner, Vindhyachal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to investigate Crime No. 176 of 2026 without collusion and to conduct a fair, impartial investigation under several sections of the B.N.S. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s observations in Sakiri Vasu …
Manoj filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an order dated 25‑01‑2021 passed by the District Magistrate of Farrukhabad under Section 14(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The petitioner did not raise any objection to the order …
The petitioners challenged the FIR dated 07-08-2026 filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, seeking its quash. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed prima facie cognizable offences, making the petition untenable. …
Petitioners Rohit and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 registered under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, …
The petitioners challenged the FIR dated 18.08.2026 registered under Section 85 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, arguing that the FIR did not disclose any cause of action and merely reflected a grievance about a pending application. The court examined the FIR and …
Avinash Sirohi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair investigation into an FIR dated 12‑04‑2026. The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s observations in Sakiri Vasu regarding the magistrate’s power under Section 156(3) of the CrPC to order further …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 19.08.2026 under Section 316(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer to quash untenable in line with …
Nagina Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑08‑2026 that registered a case under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12 of the Passport Act. The petition sought quashing of the FIR on the ground that it did not disclose a cognizable …
Petitioners Lal Chand and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 19 July 2026 that alleged offences under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 12‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 333, 76 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie case of …
Dr. Prabhat Kumar Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of crime No. 172 of 2026 under sections 352, 351(3), 318(4) of the BNSS. The petition relied on Supreme Court observations …
The petitioner Sanjay Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 3 April 2025 that alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of …
The petitioners, Smt. Neeraj and five others, filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 17 July 2026 (Crime No.270 of 2026) that alleged offences under sections 333, 76, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on …
In Criminal Appeal No. 1211 of 1988, the appellants Harish Chandra and others challenged a conviction. The High Court initially abated the appeal with respect to appellants 1, 2 and 4 and ordered a non‑bailable warrant against appellant 3, Mam Chandra @ Toti. Subsequently, the Chief Judicial …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 09-07-2026 that alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 127(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and provisions of the D.P. Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act. The High Court …
The petitioner, Akshay Kushwaha, filed a writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR dated 19 July 2026 under Sections 317(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The High Court …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under multiple sections of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. They contended that the dispute was civil in nature and that no offence was made out, seeking quash of the FIR. The respondents …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 8 July 2026, registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 352 and 127(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and found that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer …
Petitioners Ravi @ Ravikant and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 16‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 353(3), 74, 85, 89 B.N.S. and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contended that the FIR was false, malicious …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 14 July 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 356, 117(2), 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer …
The petitioner, Shivam Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 18 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. The petitioner contended that the FIR was filed …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 01.08.2026 that alleged offences under sections 329(1), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie case of commission of …
The petitioner, Arvind Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 10‑08‑2026 registered under Sections 318(4) and 62 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 25‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) and 329(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State …
The petitioner, Mahendra Chaudhary, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 27 July 2026 that alleged offences under Sections 69, 77 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, the alleged relationship with the informant was consensual, and the FIR …
The petitioners, Dr. Vijay Kumar Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash the FIR dated 17 July 2026 that registered a case under Section 304-A IPC for an alleged offence in Robertsganj, Sonbhadra. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a …
The petitioner, Vipin Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 3 July 2026 registered under multiple IPC offences (Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506) at Kalan Police Station, Shahjahanpur. He contended that the dispute was civil in nature and that no …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 24‑05‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 333 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie …
Petitioner Atul Yadav filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 27 June 2026 in Crime No.133, which alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 353 and 74 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 19‑06‑2026 under Sections 137(2) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S). The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer …
Saleem Khan filed a criminal revision petition (No. 4020 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was presented by counsel Shiv Kumar Kesari. During the hearing, counsel submitted that subsequent developments had rendered the petition …
Arun Kumar Sinha, the revisionist, was acquitted by the trial court in a criminal matter. He filed Criminal Revision No. 3852 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court, seeking dismissal of the revision on the ground that the matter had become infructuous. The learned Additional Government Advocate …
The revisionists challenged the Judicial Magistrate's order rejecting their discharge application in a case involving offences under Sections 409, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. They argued that the magistrate failed to consider the entire material, that the FIR was frivolous, and that the essential …
The revisionists, Prashant Kumar and Deepu, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad, which rejected their discharge application in a case under IPC sections 323, 504 and 354. They contended that the allegations were false, the investigation …
Petitioner Nagendra Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner, through his counsel, expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State, represented by the Additional Government …
Petitioners Gyanmati and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition alleging that police repeatedly called them for interrogation despite not being named in the FIR lodged under section 137(2) of the Police Act (BNS) in connection with a case against Harishchandra. They sought a mandamus …
Petitioner Sonu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an FIR dated 21-04-2026, registered under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that there was no instigation, conspiracy, abetment or mens rea on his part. The State opposed the …
The petitioners Pramila (alias Parmila) filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was pending before the Allahabad High Court. The Court observed that the petition had not been prosecuted and therefore could not …
Petitioner Praveen Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 31.01.2026 registered under Sections 318(4), 351(2), 336, 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought relief and later requested an adjournment to enable repayment of a disputed amount to …
The petitioners, Smt. Anita Devi and another, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 5480 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite being listed in the cause list, and the petitioners themselves were absent. The respondents' counsel, …
Petitioner Anil Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 16‑09‑2018 that named him only as a suspect, not as an accused. The State, through the Advocate General, raised two preliminary objections: (1) the petition was not maintainable because the petitioner was not …
Petitioner Pradeep @ Guddu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to grant him interim bail, relying on a 2018 Government Order on premature release. The State contended that a subsequent order dated 28‑04‑2025 had negated the earlier order, although the …
Vivek Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an FIR dated 23‑03‑2026 registered under Section 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. During the hearing the petitioner withdrew his original relief but …
Keshan Pal was subjected to a six‑month externment order dated 16‑03‑2026 under Section 3(3) of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970. He appealed the order to the Divisional Commissioner, Prayagraj, under Section 6 of the same Act and simultaneously filed a stay application, but no order was passed …
Petitioner Mahendra Kumar Mishra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents to register an FIR based on his complaint dated 18‑11‑2025. The respondents, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, raised a …
Petitioner Guljar Navi Ansari filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 17‑April‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 333, 109(1), 131, 352, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The State argued that the incident on 16‑April‑2026 was proved and that the statement of an …
Petitioners Akhilesh Kumar Pandey and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking an order that the State conduct a fair and expeditious investigation of case crime No. 357 of 2025, arising from an FIR dated 28‑09‑2025. The petition was initially filed …
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 10770 of 2026) was listed before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Ravi Shankar Mishra, was duly notified in the cause list but failed to appear, and no other representative appeared on the petitioner's behalf. The respondents, …
Shivam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 20‑03‑2026 that was lodged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that the decision to prosecute was illegal because the State authorities did not …
Petitioner Satyendra Pratap Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 20.04.2026, which alleged offences under Sections 85, 105 and 123 of the IPC and was registered as a case of murder (Section 304 IPC). The State argued that the FIR prima facie established a …
Petitioner Nitin Nagar, a named accused in an FIR dated 24‑02‑2026 (Case Crime No. 23 of 2026), filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking (a) a certiorari to quash the FIR under Sections 103(1), 109, 191(3) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and (b) a mandamus directing the investigating …
Petitioner Sarvar Alam @ Kallu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 10-04-2026 registered under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel voluntarily withdrew the challenge to the FIR and sought only a direction that any …
Shravan Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking quashment of an FIR dated 18.03.2026 registered under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities Act, 1986. He contended that a single criminal case cannot sustain …
Petitioners Parvez and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 12‑03‑2026 registered under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023. The State argued that the investigation was complete, a charge‑sheet had been filed under Section 193(3) of the BNS …
Petitioner Suman Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. The State, represented by the Advocate General, argued that the investigation was …
Mohammed Ghufran Dehelvi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State to ensure a free and fair investigation of a crime under several sections of the BNS. The State argued that the investigating officer had already forwarded the charge sheet under …
Petitioners Amir and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 30.01.2026 that alleged offences under various IPC sections, the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 and several provisions of the BNSS. The State, through the …
Petitioner Jainab Nisha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 6‑3‑2026 and the subsequent charge‑sheet filed under sections 221, 351(2) of the IPC, section 67 of the Income‑Tax Act and sections 7/8 of the POCSO Act. The State argued that the investigation was …
Petitioner Mamta Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 10-07-2025 registered under Section 103(1) of the BNS. The State, through the Advocate General, submitted that the investigating officer had already forwarded the final police report on 03-04-2026 under …
Petitioners Priti and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6812 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Jitendra Singh and Vipin Kumar, were listed in the cause list but failed to appear to press the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State …
Petitioners Anshika Singh and Salman Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 28.03.2026 in which they were not named and for which no wanted report existed. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, raised a preliminary objection that the …
The petitioner, Dhavendra, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8587 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Jitendra Kumar Yadav, was listed in the cause list but did not appear before the Court, nor was any other representative present to press the petition. …
Petitioner Saddam Husain filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 25-07-2025 registered under Sections 304-B, 498-A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. After presenting arguments, the petitioner withdrew the primary relief sought but …
Petitioner Ravi Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 30‑11‑2025 that named others but not him, alleging lack of maintainability. The petitioners argued that because they were not named in the FIR, they could not invoke the writ and cited several precedents to …
Petitioners Akeel and Mohammad Shakil Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair and impartial investigation of case crime No. 0140 of 2026, arising from an FIR dated 1 April 2026. They argued that the investigation was biased and that …
Anurag Srivastava filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6572 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was presented by counsel Rajnish Kumar Srivastava and Siddharth Srivastava, while the respondents were represented by …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08‑03‑2026 registered under several sections of the BNS Act and the D.P. Act. The State argued that a charge‑sheet had already been filed under Section 173(2) of the Cr.P.C. and that the appropriate remedy was an …
Petitioner Smt. Suman Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to investigate false complaints lodged by respondents 5 and 6, and to restrain coercive action against her family. She also requested that any interim orders be vacated. During …
Petitioner Praveen Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 20‑04‑2026 registered under Sections 26, 52 of the Indian Forest Act and Sections 109, 132 BNS. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a …
Arun Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an FIR dated 09‑04‑2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel withdrew the main relief sought but requested that the …
Petitioner Narendra Bansal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of FIR dated 01.04.2026, alleging that the matter was a civil dispute improperly converted into criminal prosecution under IPC sections 316(2), 352 and 351(2). The State and the first informant opposed, contending …
Petitioners Vivek and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 22‑03‑2026 registered under Section 353(3) and 3(5) BNS. During the hearing, the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court consider their …
Petitioner Harshit filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 6 March 2026 registered under Sections 333, 109, 108(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew his challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the …
Petitioners Surendra Mohan and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 17‑04‑2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction …
The petitioners, led by Ankit Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 1‑April‑2026 that alleged offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. During the hearing, the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead …
Petitioners Narendra @ Nagendra Singh Gurjar and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 challenging an FIR dated 19‑04‑2026 registered under Sections 306, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that a transfer order issued by one of them in the …
Petitioner Smt. Bhoori Begam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the investigation of FIR No. 45 of 2026 to be concluded. The State, through the Attorney General, argued that the petition was premature as it was filed within three months of the FIR, rendering it …
Petitioners Deen Dayal and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 25‑04‑2026 registered under IPC sections 137(2), 352 and 351(3) BNS. During the hearing the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower …
Petitioners Vikram Kushwaha and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04‑03‑2026 registered under Sections 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing they withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction …
Petitioners Kaley and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 29.03.2026 registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. They later withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court consider their bail …
Petitioner Arnav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 03‑04‑2026 registered under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 3(5) of the BNS Act and section 7 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932. The State contended that a firearm injury occurred, several accused …
Petitioner Ali Ahmad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 06-04-2026 registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. During hearing, the petitioner withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court consider his bail …
Indrawati Urf Bindrawati Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04-04-2026 registered under Sections 85, 80(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. During the hearing she withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower …
Petitioners Anchal Vishwakrma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 17‑04‑2026 registered under several IPC provisions and sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The State argued that the FIR was prima facie established based on statements …
Petitioner Poonam Bharti filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑04‑2026 under Section 105 BNS. During the hearing, she withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court consider her bail application in accordance with the Supreme …
Petitioner Harish Chahar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20‑04‑2026 registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The State argued that the victim’s injuries established a prima facie case, which the petitioner could not rebut. The petitioner …
Petitioner Vishwajeet Maurya challenged an FIR dated 27.03.2026 under IPC sections 351(3), 352 and 115(2). The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed on 07.04.2026, so the proper remedy was an application under CrPC Section 528/482, not a writ. The …
The applicants sought quashing of the criminal proceedings arising from FIR No. 353 of 2015 (Sections 406 and 420 IPC) on the ground that the dispute was essentially civil, that there was no entrustment or dishonest intention, and that the directors could not be held vicariously liable without the …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Cr.Case No. 5035/9 of 2019) arising from a 2018 case involving offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The counsel for the applicants submitted that a …
The applicants filed a Section 482 application seeking to quash the order dated 24‑12‑2020 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun, and the charge sheet dated 28‑01‑2018 relating to offences under Sections 324, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had entered into a compromise on 14‑10‑2024, which …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 1190 of 2021) that alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Domestic Violence Protection Act. The applicant had deposited Rs. 15.50 lakhs as …
Anuj Kumar Shukla filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 09‑10‑2021, the cognizance order dated 07‑12‑2021, and the entire proceedings of case No. 2679 of 2021 relating to offences under Sections 504, 506 and 324 IPC. The parties had reached a …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance and summons in a criminal case (Criminal Case No. 19385 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC. Both parties submitted that they had settled …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings arising from a charge sheet dated 23.03.2022 under Sections 498A and 323 IPC. The applicants had deposited Rs. 15,96,577 as directed by the court, part of which was released to …
The applicant, Munna Gautam, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Crime No. 235 of 2023) filed under IPC sections 193, 211, 452, 427 and 511. He argued that he had not been arrested, the charge‑sheet was already filed and the offences carried …
The applicant Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 645 of 2019, which involved alleged forgery, cheating, and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 120B. The complainant, who was the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 315 of 2021) arising from an alleged assault, abuse, and intimidation on 3 January 2019. The applicant contended that he did not commit the offences, that the injuries …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 31‑05‑2023 issued by the trial court in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 506 of the IPC. They contended that no charge had been framed against …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3905 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 304A, 337 and 338 of the IPC. Earlier, a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application challenging the same order was dismissed, and the court permitted a fresh …
The applicant, a minor, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 12‑April‑2024 passed in Criminal Case No. 92 of 2024. The order concerned a direction under Section 156(3) CrPC issued by the Circle Officer, Harsh Pandey. During the …
The applicant, Karan Rathore, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 480 of 2023) instituted under IPC sections 323, 328, 504 and 506. The applicant had deposited Rs. 15.50 lakhs as directed by the court, part of which …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 24‑12‑2020 and the charge sheet dated 28‑01‑2018 in a case involving offences under Sections 324, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had entered into a compromise on 07‑09‑2024, which was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash charge sheet No.24 of 2020 and the entire criminal proceedings (S.T. No.100 of 2024) arising from Crime No.17 of 2020, which involved offences under sections 323, 324, 325, 308, 452, 504 and 506 of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application. The court noted that the application had become infructuous due to the …
Anuj Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure invoking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to quash the charge‑sheet dated 18‑05‑2022, the cognizance order dated 17‑07‑2023, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 1170 of 2023) arising from offences …
The applicants, Yogesh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 12 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 0059 of 2025, which were instituted under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. The applicants argued that they had …
The applicants Sanjay and another filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons issued in Criminal Case No. 425 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial magistrate had issued the summons on …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning and cognizance order dated 12‑12‑2023 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kairana, in a case under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash proceedings initiated under Section 145 Cr.P.C. based on a challan report concerning a land dispute. The applicant argued that the matter was purely civil, with a pending civil suit for injunction, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a Judicial Magistrate’s order dated 15‑01‑2025 that proceeded against them under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. The charge‑sheet arose from a non‑cognizable report lodged on 07‑08‑2019, after which the magistrate directed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and summons in a criminal case involving alleged trespass, damage to property, theft, intimidation and outraging the modesty of a woman. The FIR alleged that the …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal case No. 968 of 2020, which stemmed from a land dispute involving alleged forgery of sale deeds. The prosecution alleged that the applicants conspired to forge documents to transfer land to a trust, invoking several …
Tarawati, the informant, filed an FIR and a charge‑sheet against five accused under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 120B. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) in Agra took cognizance only of sections 467, 468, 471 and 506, omitting 420 and 120B, and the applicant sought to quash …
The applicants sought to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case alleging forgery of a will concerning property of the deceased Kishori Lal. The dispute centres on two wills – one dated 17‑03‑2023 (registered in favour of the complainant) and another dated 22‑07‑2023 …
The applicant Sanjay Kumar Singh sought to quash Criminal Case No. 28196 of 2023, alleging that the FIR alleging fraud of Rs 28 lakh was false and that the dispute was civil in nature. The State contended that the applicant forged documents to obtain money and that the charge sheet supported the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash the cognizance order and charge‑sheet in a criminal case arising from an alleged demolition of a toilet, assault and criminal intimidation over a land dispute. They argued that the …
The applicant, Devender Pal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act (BNSS No. 18286 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant’s counsel, Ravi Kant Verma, submitted a supplementary affidavit, while the opposite party’s counsel, G.A. and Shri Kant Shukla, filed a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 6905 of 2022, which arose from an FIR alleging offences under Sections 420, 386, 342, 323, 504, 506 and 452 IPC. The applicants contended that the case stemmed from a monetary dispute, that an …
The applicant Subhash Yadav filed a Section 482 application seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 449 of 2019, which alleged that he and others conspired to obtain a loan by using a forged sale deed for a disputed property. The complainant claimed to have purchased the property in 1991, mortgaged it, …
The applicant, Rajendra Singh Chawla, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3027 of 2019, which alleged his involvement in forging the District Magistrate's signature on a diesel retail licence renewal. He contended that the case was …
The applicant, Akash Rajbhar, filed a Section 482 application seeking to quash a magistrate's cognizance order dated 10‑03‑2023 in a case where the FIR alleged offences under sections 419, 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC, but the charge‑sheet filed only named sections 504 and 506. The applicant contended …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 05.12.2025 passed by the Sessions Judge, Etah, alleging that the trial court proceeded despite an interim protection order dated 21.12.2022 issued by this Court. The interim order protected the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 11 April 2022 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) which had rejected their application 442(B) on the ground that it was intended to delay the trial. The applicants argued that the …
The applicant filed an FIR alleging his sister's death under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, and the accused claimed suicide based on a photocopied suicide note. During bail proceedings the accused obtained a private handwriting expert opinion on the photocopy. The applicant …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash two orders of the Judicial Magistrate, Khaga, which added Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code and committed the case to the Sessions Court. The original FIR involved offences …
The applicant filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash proceedings in Case No. 326 of 2024 (arising from Crime No. 151 of 2023) on the ground that two FIRs concerning the same stolen motorcycle had been lodged in different districts, leading to parallel trials. The first FIR (Crime No. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash proceedings (Case No. 1671 of 2024) that arose from a protest petition treated as a complaint without following Section 223 of the BNSS. The investigating officer’s report found no sufficient evidence, yet the …
The applicant, Smt. Parveen Bano, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Cr. Case No. 220 of 2023) arising from an FIR alleging offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 171D of the IPC related to alleged forged voter ID cards during …
An FIR was lodged on 12 July 2024 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). After the initial charge‑sheet, the accused filed an application under Section 156(3) CrPC (175(3) BNSS) seeking further investigation, prompting the magistrate to order collection of medical records. The …
Rashid Siddiqui, who has been granted anticipatory bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504 and 506 IPC, applied for a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to renew his passport for Hajj and Umrah. The Special Judge rejected the NOC on the ground that his bail …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No. 1824 of 2022 (Afreen Begum v. Mohd. Lukman) which alleged offences under Sections 323, 504 and 354 IPC. The complaint arose out of a property dispute and the magistrate had earlier rejected …
The applicants filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the order dated 03‑02‑2025 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 115, 351(2) and 352 of the BNSS. The offences are non‑cognizable, and the police had filed a …
The applicants, Abhishek Mishra and another, were charged under IPC sections 363, 366 and 120B following an FIR lodged by Rajesh D. Souja on 1 March 2023. While the criminal case was pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur Nagar, the parties, including the victim, entered into an …
