Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
71 judgments · newest first · showing 1–71
Prof. Ashish Wakhlu filed a contempt application alleging that the Vice‑Chancellor and members of the Executive Council of King George’s Medical University (KGMU) violated interim orders dated 20‑12‑2018 and 05‑12‑2019 by suspending and dismissing him. The High Court examined whether the respondents …
The petitioner, Smt. Shyam Lata Srivastava, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No representative of the petitioner appeared to press the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The Court observed the absence of the petitioner and noted that the petition could not be …
The petitioner Arvind Kumar Tiwari sought to set aside the 2016 selection of certain respondents under a government advertisement, alleging irregularities discovered via a Right to Information (RTI) request. The respondents argued that the petition was barred by laches, noting that the RTI …
The petitioner, Raksh Pal Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 18010 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner or his counsel appeared to prosecute the petition, while counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and, after …
Ramashray Singh Yadav filed a writ petition in the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash a Government Order dated 18‑03‑2020 and to set aside a Departmental Promotion Committee recommendation so that he could be promoted to Manager (General). The court discovered that the …
The petitioners, Bachchu Lal and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner or their counsel appeared to prosecute the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for prosecution. No counsel represented the petitioners, while the State was represented. The court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, …
Vivek Kumar filed a writ petition against the Food Corporation of India. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State was present, but the petitioner’s counsel was absent. The court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. Consequently, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for prosecution. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State's counsel was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and the lack of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 14014 of 2017 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No petitioner appeared to press the petition before the Court. Counsel for the State was present and represented the respondents. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …
Petitioner Smt. Meena Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Union of India and others. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. The …
The petitioner, Lajwanti Samson, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State was present. The Court observed that the petition could not be prosecuted due to the absence of the petitioner …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 9274 of 2021) was filed by Hemlata Singh against the State of U.P. and others. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and the lack of prosecution of the …
Mrs. Varuna filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The court observed that the petition could not be prosecuted in the absence …
The petitioner, Pushpa Gaur, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for prosecution. The State counsel was present, while no representative appeared for the petitioner. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the petition for want of …
The petitioner, Ram Shanker Mishra, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Secretary, Cooperative Societies. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the day of hearing, and the case was listed under the "cases shall not …
The petitioner, Vikash Gautam, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the …
The petitioner, Vijay Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in …
Anil Kumar Srivastav filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 19304 of 2016) before the Allahabad High Court challenging orders of the State of Uttar Pradesh and its departments. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. The counsel for the State and other respondents were present. …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 19772 of 2016) was filed by Lal Bahadur before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and consequently dismissed …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 20372 of 2016) was filed by Ram Lakhan Maurya before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State of U.P. was present. The Court observed the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. It also vacated any …
The petitioner, Rakesh Bahadur Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 13243 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petition was listed under the ‘cases shall not be adjourned’ category. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No. 11130 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petition was listed but the petitioners failed to appear before the court and made no request for adjournment. The court noted the absence of …
The petition filed by the Divisional Forest Officer and another under Article 227 challenged an interim order dated 27 January 2025 that directed the petitioner to deposit back wages within three months, a deadline later extended by three weeks on 28 April 2025. The respondents contended that …
The petitioners, including the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Forest, Government of U.P., sought relief from the High Court under Article 227, challenging an interim order dated 27 January 2025 that required the respondents to deposit back wages. The respondents argued that the back wages …
The petitioner, Ramendra Singh, a co‑owner of a property, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 27‑Oct‑2025 that allowed an appeal before the development authority and remanded the matter. The petitioner also has a pending partition suit against the respondents (Nos. 3‑9) and an …
The appellant, a bus passenger injured in a truck collision, challenged the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of Rs.1,89,834, arguing that the quantum of compensation was inadequately calculated and that the insurance company, not the truck owner, should bear liability. The Tribunal had based …
The appellant, Jai Ram Das, claimed possession of a brick‑kiln premises under a registered lease dated 22‑Nov‑2010, which he alleged was extended by subsequent payments up to 21‑May‑2026. He filed an injunction to restrain the respondents from evicting him, but the trial court rejected the …
The New India Assurance Co. appealed a compensation award of Rs.3,62,740 granted by the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, for the death of a 42‑year‑old employee. The appellant contended that the Commissioner incorrectly used an age factor of 181.37 …
The appellant National Insurance Company appealed the award of compensation granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in favor of the family of the deceased Sudeep Gupta, who died in a road accident. The Tribunal had based the award on the deceased's declared annual income of Rs.2,25,231 …
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal against an order dated 2010 in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The respondents were Smt. Vilkesh @ Sania Begum and others. The Court, after hearing counsel Siddarth Jaiswal for the appellant and Lal Chand Sahu for the respondents, dismissed …
The husband of the first respondent died in a road accident on 04.02.2007 involving an Alto car he was driving and a truck insured by Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held the truck driver 50% negligent and awarded compensation based on a notional monthly income of …
The appellant National Insurance Company appealed against a tribunal award of Rs.2,65,250, representing 75% of a calculated compensation of Rs.7,03,500 for the death of a pillion rider in a motor accident. The dispute centered on whether the accident involved a collision between a motorcycle and a …
The appellant, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., filed an appeal before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the appellant on the revised call, and the appellant's counsel had previously submitted multiple illness slips. The respondent's counsel argued that the illness slips were merely …
The United India Insurance Co. appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.5,65,500 to Vintee Ram et al., alleging that the accident involving the insured Maruti car never occurred, that the FIR was filed six days after the incident, and that the disability certificate was invalid because …
The appellants challenged a probate order dated 17 April 2011 that granted probate to a Will executed by Sumaribai on 2 December 1942 in favour of her grandsons. They argued that Bhagelu, who claimed to be Sumaribai's adopted son, was not a valid adoptee, rendering the Will defective and …
The appellant Arya Prasad Pandey and another filed a first appeal against Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. The matter was heard before Hon'ble Justice Pankaj Bhatia of the Allahabad High Court. The court disposed of the appeal by an order dated May 7, 2026. The excerpt does not provide the factual …
The appellant New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed against a tribunal award of Rs.4,51,700 for the death of Kuldeep Kumar, arguing that the driver of the offending tractor was not impleaded and that the deduction of one‑third of the loss as personal expenses was illegal because the deceased was …
A fourteen‑year‑old boy died in a road accident involving a truck, leading the claimants (the deceased’s family) to file a claim against The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. The insurer argued that the vehicle was not insured at the time of the accident and that a cheque issued by the owner was …
The appellant New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed against a tribunal award concerning compensation for the death of a contractor in a motor vehicle accident. The tribunal had fixed the deceased's monthly earnings at Rs.5,000, rejecting the claimant's claim of Rs.9,000, and the High Court accepted …
The appellant filed a claim petition for compensation after the death of a person in a road accident that occurred on 26.05.2008 at Sivan Bypass Road, Bihar. The petition was filed in Deoria, Uttar Pradesh, on the ground that the claimants were working for gain there. The Claims Tribunal dismissed …
The appellants appealed against the Tribunal’s award dated 28 May 2024 which dismissed their claim for compensation arising from a motor‑vehicle accident that caused the death of Subhash Chandra Vimal. The dispute centred on the correct registration number of the dumper involved – the FIR recorded …
Petitioner Jagdish Prasad filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was previously adjourned at the petitioner's request, and the court ordered that no further adjournment would be granted and listed the matter for 10 April 2024. On the scheduled date, the petitioner failed …
The petitioner, Aditya Singh, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution against Rubi Gulam Hakkani Khan. The case was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, and counsel for the petitioner, Amit Singh, was recorded. However, on the hearing date, no representative appeared …
Kalika Prasad filed a writ petition (No. 18756 of 2019) challenging the High Court's order that released the landlord and dismissed the tenant's appeal. The petitioner failed to appear before the court even after a revised call. The court noted that factual findings had already been recorded in …
Smt. Nidhi Singh filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of a family court case (No. 2162 of 2022) from the Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow to the equivalent court at District Moradabad. An earlier order dated 13‑11‑2024 had dismissed the transfer …
Malkeet Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the learned Additional Government …
Petitioner Chandralekha Singh filed a petition under Article 227 challenging a Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) order dated 02‑09‑2024, alleging that the order was passed without any hearing and was prima facie suspicious. The respondent, Canara Bank Regional Office, contended that an appeal against the …
The applicants, Syed Mohd. Afzal and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 24‑05‑2022 in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 465 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They …
The applicants, Dharmendra Nishad and two others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in POCSO Case No. 11/2018 and to stay any further proceedings, relying on a joint compromise dated 20‑08‑2025. They also invoked the …
The applicants, Ranu and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a pending criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The …
Dr. Baby Tabassum Haroon filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The matter was listed and subsequently placed on a revised list, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant. The court noted the absence of …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (and Section 528) seeking relief, but no petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court dismissed the application on …
Mrs. X, the complainant and victim in crime case No. 196/2023, filed an application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) (Application No. 283 of 2025) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and six others. The application was to be heard before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High …
The applicant, Jyoti, filed an application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) (No. 313 of 2025) against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel for the applicant appeared to press the application, nor was any request made for an adjournment. The court noted the absence of …
Smt. Shobha Devi filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to intervene in the proceedings before the trial court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented …
Mohd. Yaar and others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court dismissed the petition for want of …
Smt. Husnoor Khan filed an application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 713 of 2024) against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The applicant's counsels, Firoz Ahmad Khan and Mohd. Shafiq, were absent and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the lack of representation …
The applicant, Smt. Anupama Singh, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, No. 6683 of 2013, against the State of U.P. The High Court observed that a considerable lapse of time had occurred since the filing in 2013. It was held that the delay indicated either a loss …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2016 seeking relief against the State of U.P. The application remained pending for several years. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, while the State's counsel was present. The High Court observed …
The applicant Rakesh Singh filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 5615 of 2013) against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The court observed the …
The applicants, Ram Vishal Tiwari and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 4638 of 2013) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, while the State was represented by its …
The petitioners, Pratap Narain Gupta and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but they were not present in court. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, was present. The High Court observed that there was no …
The applicant, Jeevan Khanna, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court …
Shiv Raj Singh filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (and Section 528) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No representative of the applicant appeared before the court to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (and a reference to Section 528) seeking relief. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The High Court dismissed the …
Shiv Pratap Singh filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 5689 of 2012) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The High Court observed that, owing to the passage of time, the matter had become infructuous and there was no longer any live cause of …
Suresh Kumar filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. The matter was listed as a case not to be adjourned, but the applicant failed to appear while the State's learned A.G.A. was present. The Court observed that, due to the …
Ram Deen and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed as a non‑adjournable case, but the applicants did not appear. The court observed that, due to the passage of time, the application had become …
The applicant, Ashish Vats, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue the application, while counsel for the State was …
Wadood Ahmad filed a writ petition (No. 5036 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging orders passed by the Additional District Judge/Ftc Pratapgarh and two other respondents. The petitioner failed to appear even after the court issued a revised call, indicating a lack of …
