Created by Fuzzy Cloud

PRAFULLA S KHUBALKAR

30 judgments · newest first · showing 1–30

AMIT HANUMANT JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Amit Hanumant Jadhav and Vyanktesh Jeevan Chandekar, who were accused in FIR No. 118 of 2025 for alleged diversion of proprietary "TWAT Catalyst Technology" of Priyaanjas OPC Pvt. Ltd. The offences alleged were under Sections 3(5) and …

VYANKTESH JEEVAN CHANDEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Amit Hanumant Jadhav and Vyanktesh Jeevan Chandekar, who were accused in FIR No. 118 of 2025 for alleged diversion of proprietary "TWAT Catalyst Technology" of Priyaanjas OPC Pvt. Ltd. The offences alleged were under Sections 3(5) and …

JAYANT GOVIND CHANDORKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Dr. Jayant Govind Chandorkar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No. 118 of 2025, filed under Sections 3(5) and 316(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 43(b), 43(j), 66 and 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 for allegedly diverting the ‘TWAT Catalyst …

SHARAD GOVIND SAWANTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sharad Govind Sawant, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for alleged offences of cheating, criminal breach of trust and fraud under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 351(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. …

RUPESH RAMSAJIVANLAL SONIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed To be withdrawn

Rupesh Ramsajivanlal Soni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 639 of 2026) registered under Section 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that the dispute was …

SANDEEP RAJENDRA SINGH@DEEPAK SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicant, Sandeep Rajendra Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The court, after hearing, indicated it was not inclined to grant the relief sought. Counsel for the applicant then requested permission to withdraw the application. The court granted …

SNEHAL RAJESH PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Snehal Rajesh Pawar, sought anticipatory bail in a murder case (Crime No.189 of 2025) filed under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that she, along with two others, concealed the dead body of her handicapped daughter after the alleged …

SURESH DALARAM SENversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Suresh Dalaram Sen, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for alleged offences of cheating, criminal breach of trust and threatening the complainant with a pistol under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges that the …

BHAVITA VISHNU PATIL AND ANRversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

Disposed Off

In a civil appellate matter, the original respondent, Smt. Ruchita Vishnu Patil, died during the pendency of the appeal, which was finally decided on 14 July 2025. The applicants sought to bring the legal representatives of the deceased respondent on record to enable withdrawal of a statutory …

LAKHAN MOHAN WASWANI @ PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Lakhan Mohan Waswani applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in a case involving alleged sword attacks causing grievous injuries. He claimed false implication and sought bail to appear for examinations, citing his student status. The State argued …

BIRBAL RAMDULAHAR YADAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicant, Birbal Ramdulahar Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing the request, was not inclined to continue hearing the matter …

KESHAV KUMAR SHASHI BHUSHAN SINHAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC for an alleged cheating offence punishable under IPC Section 420 and IT Act Sections 66(c) and 66(d). The complainant alleged that the applicant received Rs 7,88,900 transferred to his bank account in 2019 after being deceived by a …

VICKY ANANDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The husband filed an anticipatory bail application under section 438 of the CrPC in connection with FIR No. 642 of 2024 alleging offences including cruelty (498-A), assault (323), criminal breach of trust (420), forgery (468) and others. The wife alleged physical and mental cruelty, theft of golden …

RAJESH KUNVERJI GALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case where an FIR was lodged 18 years after an alleged forgery of a 1991 affidavit related to a shop sale in 1997. The complainant alleged that the affidavit contained a non‑existent …

Eram Anwar DholkiyaversusThe State of Maharashtra

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicant, Eram Anwar Dholkiya, filed a criminal application seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail that had been granted earlier. The applicant argued that the main accused had been acquitted by the trial court on 1 July 2026, rendering the request for cancellation moot. The learned counsel …

PRANAV SHRIGOPAL KABRAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

These are two anticipatory bail applications before the Bombay High Court. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 599 of 2024 was filed by Pranav Shrigopal Kabra under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre-arrest bail in Crime No. 70 of 2024 dated 29.01.2024 registered …

RAJESH SHYAMU DHOTRE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, employees of Hindusthan Petroleum, filed an anticipatory bail application to avoid arrest in Crime No.88 of 2025, which involves offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. An interim protection order had been granted on …

SUDESH TUKARAM INDAPversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicant, Vasant Anandrao Idhol, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The court, after hearing arguments, was initially not inclined to grant relief. Counsel for the applicant then sought permission to withdraw the application. The court granted permission to …

BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.versusBALARAM KANHA VALVI AND ORS.

Dismissed

The appellant, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., appealed an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Thane, under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The appellant argued that a prior judgment of this Court (First Appeal (St) No. 6515 of 2024) decided a similar controversy, …

PRAKASH BIHANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Prakash Bihani, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The grievance between the complainant and the applicant was subsequently resolved. On instructions, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Lalit Pal, sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court …

SURAJ LAXMIKANT VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Suraj Laxmikant Vishwakarma was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the High Court of Bombay. Counsel for the applicant sought the Court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court examined whether a pending anticipatory bail application …

AMIT BALU LANDGEversusDINESH RAJU TAMBE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Amit Balu Landge, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioner informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. He consequently requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, …

SWAPNIL SUNIL RAUTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

Mr. Swapnil Sunil Raut filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay. The Court, after hearing, was not inclined to grant bail. Counsel for the applicant then sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, …

AMAN BHOLA SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Aman Bhola Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail in a case alleging illegal diversion of international telephone calls through a company called M/s Maindoevuvers Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The …

M/S. SHREE SAI DEVELOPERSversusASHOK ATHMARAM KARIA

Dismissed

The applicants, who were original defendants in a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction, filed a Civil Revision under Section 115 CPC challenging the trial court’s order rejecting their application under Order VII Rule 11 seeking dismissal of the plaint. They contended that Section …

DR DHIRAJ RAMPYARE DUBE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, two doctors and their sister, were charged with cheating, forgery and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, based on a complaint alleging fraudulent investment schemes. They sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, …

AJAY KUMAR R BHARTIYA AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Applicants Ajay Kumar R Bhartiya and another filed an anticipatory bail application after being charged under multiple sections, which were later dropped, leaving only a charge under section 317(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, punishable by up to three years imprisonment. The applicants …

SHIRLEY NARESH RAJWANIversusM/S.NENSEE CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD.AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioner, Shirley Naresh Rajwani, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a trial court order that allowed the defendants, Nensee Construction Pvt. Ltd. and others, to file a written statement despite a prior "no written statement" order dated 16 January 2014. The defendants had …

SMT. ZINGUBAI HARIBHAU GALANDE AND ANRversusDARYUS SOLEEY PANTHAKEY

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Zingubai Haribhau Galande and anr., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondent, Daryus Soleey Panthakey. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the grievance no longer subsisted and that they wished to …