Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
339 judgments · newest first · showing 201–339
The petitioners, Sushil and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They later prayed for dismissal of the present petition, seeking liberty to file a fresh writ petition with better averments and documents. The request was not opposed by the counsel for respondents No.2 and …
Veer Pal Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The respondents' counsel did not oppose this …
The petitioner, Abhay Kumar Singh, challenged the order of punishment affirmed in an appeal before the High Court of Allahabad. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, contended that the petitioner had a statutory alternative remedy under Rule 23 of the U.P. Police Officials of the …
The petitioner, Ramashray Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed and that the petitioner be given liberty to file a fresh writ petition challenging the decision dated 15‑10‑2025. The Court …
Smt Chaya filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 6676 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Union of India and two other respondents. The petitioner, through counsel Mohammad Umar Khan, later moved that the petition be withdrawn and that she be given liberty to file a fresh …
The petitioner, a police constable, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to promote him to the post of Head Constable, citing the completion of a disciplinary punishment dated 12.01.2024 and his seniority. He alleged that despite repeated representations to the …
The petitioner, Ramdarash Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the District Probation Officer, Azamgarh, to pay him salary for work performed as a Chaukidar. He claimed to have received an offer letter dated 12-11-2025 from an authorized secretary of a private service provider, IT …
The petitioners challenged the State of U.P. and others for declaring results only for 930 of the 1,129 Computer Operator Grade‑A posts advertised, leaving 199 positions unfilled. They sought a court order directing the respondents to declare the results for the remaining vacancies. The respondents …
Shiv Shankar Richhariya, a retired Sub‑Inspector, challenged a post‑retirement deduction of Rs.5,70,849 ordered by the Commissioner of Police, Agra, alleging it was an illegal recovery of excess salary. The petitioner argued that such recovery after retirement, without fraud or misrepresentation, …
The petitioner, Lok Pal Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Cane Officer of Bulandshahar to reimburse his and his wife's medical expenses and to decide on representations he had submitted on 27‑05‑2025 and 05‑02‑2026, which the officer allegedly refused to accept. …
Sarita Pandey, appointed on a one‑year contractual basis in 2010 as District Social Audit Coordinator, continued in the post for about 15 years and later developed visual impairment. After the contract expired on 01‑04‑2026, the authorities did not grant her an extension, unlike similarly situated …
Vipin Kumar Rathore filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 23 July 2025 issued by the Deputy Director of Agriculture, Pilibhit, and also raised the termination of his services dated 29 August 2025 by Avani Paridhi Energy & Communication Pvt. Ltd. The petitioner was employed as an …
Petitioner Sunita Devi challenged a notice dated 18 March 2024 issued by the Police Commissioner, Varanasi. The petitioner argued that a subsequent decision in another writ (Writ A No.11573 of 2024) rendered the present petition moot. The court examined whether the notice could still be contested in …
The petitioner, a former Assistant Agriculture Inspector appointed in 1968, was suspended in 1975 following an FIR under Section 409 IPC and subsequently terminated on 30‑12‑1976 after a departmental inquiry. He was acquitted of the criminal charges on 04‑01‑2024 and thereafter wrote to the Director …
Mst. Ram Sakhi filed writ petition No. 3174 of 1979 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the list was revised. The court noted the absence of the petitioner’s representation and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim …
The petitioner, Dhruvram, filed a writ petition seeking reimbursement of medical bills, alleging that his representations to the authorities had not been acted upon despite a considerable lapse of time. The petition was heard ex parte, as no response was obtained from the respondents, the State of …
The petitioner Shiv Pratap Singh challenged a punishment order dated 15 July 2025 issued by the Superintendent of Police. He filed a statutory appeal on 1 January 2026, contending that the appeal was delayed due to bona‑fide reasons and that a small delay should be condoned. The Deputy Inspector …
The petitioner, Durgawati Tiwari, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, seeking liberty to approach the authorities later. The respondents did not oppose this request. The court …
Petitioner Mahendra Nath Shukla filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Secretary, Ministry of Public Works, U.P., to pay his third Assured Career Progression benefits accrued on 17-12-2019, along with interest. He alleged that despite several …
The petitioner, Km Sushma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed to allow filing a fresh petition with improved averments and documents. The Court accepted this prayer, dismissing the present writ …
The petitioner, a contractual employee since 2012, was served a show‑cause notice and subsequently a termination order dated 29‑05‑2025 by the Director, Women Welfare, U.P., without her reply being considered. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashal of the termination order, alleging …
The petitioner, Satya Prakash, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16 April 2026 issued by the Additional Director General of Police, which rejected his claim. The High Court, after noting the affidavit and the petitioner's representation filed on 10 April 2026, considered the petition. …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition challenging a letter dated 27.08.2025 in which the District Panchayat Raj Officer sought permission from the State Government to initiate disciplinary proceedings against him under Article 321-A of the Civil Service Regulation. The High …
The petitioner, a Class‑IV employee, filed a representation against a disciplinary order in 2013 but only appealed to the Deputy Director, Panchayat Raj, Bareilly on 16 May 2025, more than twelve years later. The appeal was dismissed on the ground of laches. The petitioner argued that unavoidable …
The petitioners sought a mandamus directing the Engineer‑in‑Chief (Mechanical) of the Uttar Pradesh Irrigation and Water Resources Department to consider their promotion to Junior Engineer (Mechanical) under the 10% quota as per Rule 5(3) read with Rule 8 of the 1992 Service Rules. An earlier writ …
The petitioner, Vijay Pal Singh, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the respondents to grant him post‑retirement benefits, assured career progression, and to refund an amount recovered between 1 April 2001 and 29 September 2003. The petitioner later clarified that the refund prayer …
The petitioner, Smt. Shachi Jain, filed a writ petition which the court found to be not pressed. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested dismissal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The court granted this prayer, dismissing the petition as not pressed and allowing the …
The petitioner, Deependra Kumar, challenged a punishment order dated 07.02.2026 issued by the Deputy Police Commissioner, Agra. The court was informed that the petitioner could appeal the order under Rule 20 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment And Appeal) Rules, …
The petitioner, Rajesh Singh, challenged the suspension order dated 14 January 2026 issued by the Director, Cooperative Societies and Panchayat Audit, Government of Uttar Pradesh. The court noted that the charge‑sheet had been served on the petitioner and an enquiry report was filed on 2 February …
The petitioner, Abhay Ram Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition. The respondents did not oppose this request. The Court, after noting …
Gautam Kumar filed a writ petition seeking either appointment on compassionate grounds as a Home Guard volunteer or a monetary assistance of Rs.5,00,000 to his mother. The petition was heard before Hon'ble Justice Prakash Padia. The Court recorded instructions dated 14-04-2026 from the Deputy …
The petitioner, Govind Lal Srivastava, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash several notices issued by the Joint Development Commissioner, Varanasi Division, alleging they were based on forged medical reimbursement bills. The respondent submitted instructions from the Commissioner …
Retired Sub‑Inspector Raj Kumar Singh filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24‑12‑2024 that reduced his pensionable basic salary from Rs.66,200 to Rs.55,200. He sought quashing of that order and direction to restore his pension to the higher amount. The petitioner relied on the judgment …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Singh, challenged the suspension order dated 29 July 2025 issued by the second respondent. The court noted that the charge-sheet and enquiry report had already been filed. After hearing both sides, the High Court directed the disciplinary authority to complete the …
The petitioner, Rajendra Singh, challenged three disciplinary orders: one dated 18‑09‑2024 (appeal rejected on 08‑11‑2024 and revision rejected on 24‑12‑2025), another dated 06‑02‑2025 (appeal rejected on 31‑05‑2025), and a pending revision against the latter. The Court held that the writ petition …
The petitioner, Bhanu Pratap Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was found to be not pressed, i.e., lacking sufficient grounds or substantive averments. Counsel for the petitioner, Varad Nath, requested that the petition be dismissed and that the petitioner be …
Paras Nath Rawat, a former sweeper, retired on 31-10-2022 and later had Rs.2,94,000 deducted from his post‑retirement benefits after the authorities corrected his pay‑scale and deemed the amount an excess payment. The State argued that the deduction was justified because the pay‑scale error had been …
The petitioner, Sher Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that subsequent developments had rendered the petition infructuous. No opposition was raised by the respondents, State of U.P. and others. The court accepted the …
Petitioner Shankar Kushwaha filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that subsequent developments rendered the petition infructuous. The respondent did not oppose the prayer to dismiss the petition on this ground. The court examined …
Sudama filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an ex‑parte order dated 09‑12‑2025 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Administration‑IVth, Gorakhpur under Section 24(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and a prohibition restraining interference with …
The petitioner, Shiv Karan, filed Writ Petition No. 2500 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed for a priority hearing under the "Oldest pending cases" category. Neither the petitioner nor the private respondent …
Satya Narain filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the "oldest pending cases" category. Neither the petitioner nor the private respondent appeared before the court on the scheduled date. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ …
The petitioner, Parikha, filed writ petition No. 3175 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the heading "Oldest pending cases for priority hearing". Neither the petitioner nor the private respondent appeared before the Court on the scheduled date. …
The petitioner, Hardwar Raza, filed Writ Petition No. 4668 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents, D.D.C. and others. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the "Oldest pending cases" category. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner nor the …
The petitioner, Smt. Tapeshra, filed Writ Petition No. 5314 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the "Oldest pending cases" heading. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner nor the private respondent appeared before the Court. Consequently, …
The petitioner, Sheshdhar, filed writ petition No. 2153 of 1979 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for hearing but no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The learned Standing Counsel and counsel for the respondents were present. The court noted the absence of …
Smt. Phool Kunwar filed a writ petition (Writ B No. 500 of 1982) before the Allahabad High Court against D.D.C. and others. The petition was listed for a priority hearing under the "Oldest pending cases" category. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner's counsel nor the private respondent's …
The petitioner, Sumer Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The court accepted this prayer and ordered the dismissal of the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. The …
The Gaon Sabha initiated proceedings against the petitioner under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which were later dropped by the Assistant Collector. The Gaon Sabha filed a recall and stay application, which the court allowed. The petitioner then filed a statutory appeal under Section …
The petitioner filed a writ petition which the Court found to be not pressed. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested dismissal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court allowed the prayer, dismissing the petition as not pressed and granting the liberty to approach …
The petitioner, Sahab Lal, challenged an order dated 08.05.2023 that quashed eviction proceedings initiated under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The State appealed the quash order under Section 67(5), and the Additional District Magistrate set aside the quash order, directing a fresh …
The petitioner challenged the order of the Additional District Magistrate/Additional Collector (Civil Supply), Prayagraj, which set aside an earlier order quashing eviction proceedings and remanded the matter for a fresh decision with a hearing. The petition sought a direction that the Assistant …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking to quash orders dated 19.11.2024 and 18.10.2025 issued by the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Varanasi, which remanded a matter back to the Tehsildar of Shakaldeeha, District Chandauli. The petitioners later limited their prayer to directing …
The Gram Sabha initiated proceedings against Qayyum Ahmad, which were later dropped by the Assistant Collector on 17‑08‑2021. Gulam Husain, who was not a party to those proceedings, appealed the order under Section 65(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, but the appeal was dismissed by the Additional …
The petitioner challenged an order dated 12 January 2026 issued by the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Kannauj. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested that the writ petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed. The respondent counsel, including the Standing …
Arvind Kumar filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 17 December 2025 issued by the Assistant Collector‑Tehsildar of Etawah, which directed him to submit a reply within a stipulated period. The petitioner did not file the required reply before approaching the court. The High Court examined …
Petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but later filed an application, supported by an affidavit, seeking to withdraw the petition due to subsequent developments. The court examined the affidavit and considered the petitioners' desire to discontinue the proceedings. It held …
Smt. Gangotri Devi filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Phoolpur, to decide Appeal/Case No. 18050 of 2025 without further delay. The petitioner argued that a considerable period had elapsed without a final decision. The Court observed that putting the …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 29‑12‑2025 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Shikarpur, which had dropped proceedings initiated under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 against private respondents for alleged illegal occupation of land reserved for public purpose. The …
The Committee of Management of Swawalambi Basic Primary Pathshala filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Assistant Collector (First Class)/Tehsildar of Machalishehar, Jaunpur to decide a restoration application dated 30 September 2025. The petitioners argued that despite a considerable …
The petitioners, Pradeep Dubey and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an unspecified action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. The petitioners sought relief but later requested the court to dismiss the petition on the ground that it was …
The petitioner, Hargovind, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. After hearing the parties, counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed. The Court …
The petitioner, Vinay Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. After hearing arguments from both sides, the counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Court examined …
Petitioner Toulan Gupta filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Handia, Prayagraj, to decide a representation dated 16 May 2023 filed under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that Section 24(3) mandates that such …
The petitioners Natthoo Singh and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the heading "Oldest pending cases for priority hearing." No counsel or parties appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the private respondents on …
The petitioner Birbal filed writ petition No.14175 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing but neither the petitioner nor the private respondent appeared before the court. Since no party was present to argue, the court dismissed the writ petition in …
The petitioner, Tausif, filed Writ Petition No. 15143 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the D.D.C. and others. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the "oldest pending cases" category. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner nor the private respondent …
The petitioner, Fauz Singh, filed writ petition No. 14623 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under "Oldest pending cases". Neither the petitioner nor the private respondent appeared before the Court on the scheduled date. The Court, noting the absence …
The petitioner, Sagiran, filed Writ Petition No. 14741 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondent, D.D.C. The matter was listed for a priority hearing under the "Oldest pending cases" category. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner nor the private …
The petitioner, Ram Jatan, filed writ petition No.16091 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under “Oldest pending cases”. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner’s counsel nor the private respondent appeared before the court. Consequently, the …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 15831 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under "Oldest pending cases". Neither the petitioner nor the private respondent appeared before the court. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition in default. …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.1505 of 1980 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent was represented by counsel. The court noted the absence of the petitioner’s representation. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition in …
The petitioner, Smt Rama Devi Shukla, filed a writ petition under Section 101 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, challenging an order dated 23 April 2025 passed by Respondent No.4. The petitioner sought dismissal of the writ petition on the ground that it was not pressed with liberty to challenge the …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 11.08.2025 passed by the Commissioner, Moradabad Division under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The High Court observed that the petitioners have a statutory alternative remedy – a second appeal under the III Schedule of the same Code – and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate to consider their representation dated 26‑09‑2025 for entry of their names as legal heirs of a deceased in the revenue records. The court examined the representation and noted that such relief is governed by Section …
Lal Bahadur filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and six other respondents. The petition was argued before Hon'ble Justice Prakash Padia. After hearing the submissions, the court held that the petition was not pressed. Consequently, the …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 29 August 2025 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Jaunpur, under Section 38(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which was initiated by respondent No.6, Sri Prakash. The Court noted that the petitioners failed to demonstrate any prejudice caused …
The petitioner, Smt. Dhanpatiya, filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Sadar, Gorakhpur, to decide the pending case RST/4070 of 2025 within the stipulated period. The petitioner alleged undue delay and unnecessary adjournments in the disposal of …
The petitioner, Prahlad, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to investigate and remove an alleged illegal and forged entry on Gram Sabha land in Village Semari, Mirzapur, which was recorded as Banjar. He alleged that villagers, in …
The petitioner, Musabbar, challenged a show‑cause notice issued by the Tehsildar of Sambhal directing him to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on 0.078 hectare of land. The petitioner submitted a written objection on 30‑08‑2025, which was annexed to the writ petition. The Respondent’s …
Petitioner Bankey Lal and others filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Officer/ADM (Finance & Revenue), Jaunpur, to decide a pending case under Section 30(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, filed on 29-11-2023. The petitioners argued that the respondent's inaction caused undue …
The petitioners, Dhanraji Devi and others, filed Writ C No. 7771 of 2026 challenging an order obtained by private respondent Jeet Narayan Singh, alleging concealment of facts in a prior judgment dated 10.07.2025 (Writ C No. 20929 of 2025). The order was being used by revenue authorities to initiate …
Dashrath Chauhan filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Nizamabad, Azamgarh, to decide a restoration application dated 03-06-2025 filed in case T202415060200751. The petitioner alleged delay in the SDM's decision and …
Petitioner Rahul Mishra filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Meja, Prayagraj, to decide case No. 3676 of 2024 (Computer Case No. T202402030803676) without further delay. The petitioner argued that despite a considerable lapse of time, no final …
The petitioner, Gulam Husain, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Machali Sahar, Jaunpur, to decide Suit No.7354 of 2025 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within the stipulated period. The petition did not request any relief against the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition which the Court found to be not pressed. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested dismissal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court allowed the prayer, dismissing the petition as not pressed and granting the liberty to file a new …
The petitioner, a complainant, sought a writ directing the Tehsildar of Madhiyahu Tehsil to decide a land revenue case under Section 67 of the Land Revenue Code, 2006 within the stipulated period. The Court noted that the petitioner failed to establish his locus standi or demonstrate that he is a …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Hata Tehsil, Kushinagar, to expeditiously decide a pending mutation application (Case No. 1099 of 2024). The petitioner argued that under sub‑rule (7) of Rule 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the Tehsildar …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the Tehsildar, Tehsil and District of Deoria to decide a mutation case (Case No. 7799 of 2021) under Sections 34 and 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, within the time limits prescribed by sub‑rule (7) of Rule 34 of the Uttar …
Petitioner Chandrapal filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate to decide a revenue case (Case No.8565 of 2025) under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code within the prescribed time. The High Court examined the petition …
Petitioner Smt. Renu Devi filed writ petition (Writ‑C No. 7884 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Additional Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, Gorakhpur, to decide the pending computer case (No. T202205310319896) against her within a fixed period. The petition …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) to decide Appeal No.1134 of 2025 expeditiously under Section 59 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016. The court noted that while notices were issued to the opposite party on 17-04-2025, the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddha Nagar to decide their representation dated 23.01.2026, wherein they requested entry of their names as legal heirs in the revenue records. The Court examined the representation and noted that such …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddha Nagar to decide a representation dated 23 January 2026, wherein they requested entry of their names as legal heirs of a deceased in the revenue records. The Court examined the representation and …
The petitioner, Abhinay, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioner deposited the required cost of Rs.5,000 with the High Court Legal Services Committee as directed by the court. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Meja, Prayagraj, to decide their restoration application (No. RST/9021 of 2025) filed under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, within the prescribed period. The petition arose from a …
Beena Srivastava filed a writ petition (WRIT C No.10113 of 2026) seeking a direction to the Naib Tehsildar of Lalganj, District Mirzapur, to decide a pending recall application (RST No.1780 of 2024) that had remained undecided for a considerable period. The petitioner argued that the delay violated …
The petitioner, Ghanshyam Ray, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent, the State of U.P., to decide Case No. 10101 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.T202505440110101) without further delay. The petitioner contended that despite a considerable lapse of time, no final decision …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Commissioner, Prayagraj Mandal, to decide Revision No.824 of 2022 (Mohammad Jilani & others v. Rasheeda Khatoon & others) within a stipulated period. The petition alleged delay in disposal of the …
The petitioner, Mewati Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Ghazipur, to decide an application filed under Section 67-A(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Case No.14179 of 2025). The petition was filed after the application had already been submitted …
The petitioner, Nasir Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar (Judicial) of Bilari, Moradabad, to decide his restoration application (Recall No.7104 of 2023, Computer Case No.T202313540207104) which had remained pending for a considerable time. The petitioner argued that …
Mahaveer Singh filed a writ petition before the High Court of Allahabad challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three other respondents. The petition was argued before the Court and, after hearing, counsel for the petitioner prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Court …
Petitioners Ram Das and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a governmental action. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners requested that the petition be dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed. The Court accepted this request and dismissed the …
Apurva Singh filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar, Judicial, Ballia Sadar, to decide a pending mutation case (No.11136 of 2025) that had been filed under sub‑rule (7) of Rules 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016. The petitioner argued that the Tahsildar had failed to …
The petitioner, Amod Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing arguments, counsel for the petitioner requested the dismissal of the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. The Court considered the request and found that the petition indeed lacked the …
Petitioner Noor Alam filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the Up‑Ziladhikari of Tehsil‑Kasya, District Kushinagar, to decide a restoration application dated 02‑Nov‑2023 that had been dismissed in default on 25‑Oct‑2023. The petitioner argued that despite the lapse of considerable time, no …
The Mahant Ram Singh Durga Mandir Trust claimed ownership of a 0.544‑hectare parcel of land in Diha village, Prayagraj, on which a temple and a house were constructed about fifty years ago. The Trust, belonging to the OBC category, filed an application on 29 January 2026 before the Sub‑Divisional …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Padrauna to decide a pending mutation application (Case No.3077 of 2022) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that under sub‑rule (7) of Rule 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the Tehsildar must dispose of undisputed …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the respondents to incorporate a 2024 order into the revenue records. The petitioner relied on a 2015 judgment (Ramashish v. Additional Commissioner) which held that any order, whether final or interim, must be entered in the revenue …
The petitioner, Vyasmuni, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No. T202605440402539) filed under Section 67-A of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a …
Gangotri Devi filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending revenue case (No.T202605440402532) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse of …
Deenanath filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No. T202605440402541) filed under Section 67‑A of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner contended that an inordinate amount of time had …
The petitioner, Deenanath, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No.T202605440402543) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that an inordinate amount …
The petitioner, Swaminath, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a revenue case (Case No. T202605440402536) filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Gagandev, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No.T202605440402545) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse …
The petitioner, Bahadur, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a revenue matter (Case No. T202605440402538) filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a …
The petitioner, Subhash, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a revenue case (Case No. T202605440402533) filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable …
The petitioner, Vijay, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a case (No.T202605440402551) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse of …
The petitioner, Sukdev, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No.T202605440402540) filed under Section 67‑A of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a …
Hari filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending case (No. T202605440402547) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse of time, no …
Ganesh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a pending revenue case (No. T202605440402549) filed under Section 67‑A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that an …
The petitioner, Bunela, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Kasiya, District Kushinagar, to decide a revenue case (No. T202605440402531) filed under Section 67-A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that despite a considerable lapse …
The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar Maurya, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 10109 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was heard before Hon’ble Justice Prakash Padia. After hearing the arguments, counsel …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Agarwal, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional Commissioner (Administrative), Agra Division, to decide Appeal No.2020 of 2023 (Computerized Case No.C202301000002020) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that a considerable period had elapsed without a …
Smt. Ramshree filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Additional Commissioner (Administrative), Agra Division, to decide Revision No.1925 of 2025 (Computer Case No.C202501000001925) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that despite considerable time lapse, no …
Petitioner Smt. Sushila Pandey filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial), Handia Tehsil, to dispose of a restoration application (T202502030410488) that had been pending for over five years. The petitioner argued that despite the lapse of considerable …
The petitioner, Mohmood Fatima, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Tehsil Chayal, District Kaushambi, to decide a restoration application dated 21-12-2017 (case No. 205263 of 2017, Pradeep Kumar vs. Asharif Lal) within a fixed period. The petitioner argued that an …
The petitioner, Kartar Singh @ Kaushal Bharti, filed a writ petition seeking direction for the speedy disposal of a restoration application pending before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Etmadpur, under Section 209(h) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The restoration application, filed on 13 March …
The petitioners filed a supplementary affidavit in the writ petition. The High Court of Allahabad recorded the affidavit on the official record. No substantive facts or legal issues were discussed in the order. The court scheduled the matter for hearing on 23 March 2026 and placed it in the …
The petitioners, Dharmi Devi and another, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Nizamabad, Azamgarh, to decide appeal No.T202515060210774 of 2025 expeditiously. They alleged that despite a considerable lapse of time, no final decision had been rendered. The …
Smt. Dulari Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 1913 of 2026) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, did not appear before the court. The respondents were represented by C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti. Justice Manish Kumar Nigam noted …
Petitioners Shobharam and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and five other respondents. After hearing arguments, counsel for the petitioners moved that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The standing counsel for the …
The writ petition filed by Ram Charittar Singh was listed for a priority hearing, but no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition in default. The court also vacated any interim order that had been previously granted. The judgment notes …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 13991 of 1981 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was listed for hearing. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition in default. The Court also vacated any …
The writ petition No. 13349 of 1982 filed by Chokhe was listed for hearing but no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition in default. The interim order previously granted, if any, was vacated. The court directed that any aggrieved …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 13460 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled hearing. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition in default and vacated any interim order previously granted. The Court directed that any …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 13637 of 1981 in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed for hearing. The Court dismissed the petition in default for non-appearance. The interim order previously granted, if any, was vacated. The …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 14164 of 1983 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The matter was listed for a priority hearing under the "Oldest pending cases" category. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the scheduled date. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the scheduled date. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition in default. The court also vacated any interim order that may have been granted earlier. The judgment …
