Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
41 judgments · newest first · showing 1–41
Smt. Laxmi Kushwaha filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside a Family Court order and to compel the opposite party to pay her maintenance of Rs.25,000 per month, including arrears from 2020 to 2025, alleging she was unemployed for a period. She …
Vinod filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs.2500 granted by the Family Court, Mau, on 10‑01‑2025 to his wife. The revision was filed after a delay of 509 days, which the revisionist sought to condone. The High Court observed that …
Mukesh Kumar (Jai Singh) filed a criminal revision challenging an ex‑parte maintenance order dated 05‑07‑2025 that required him to pay Rs 3,000 per month to his wife without a hearing. He argued the order was passed without due process and that the revision was filed after a 341‑day delay. The …
Jita Yadav filed a criminal revision petition (No. 1970 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and another party. The revisionist's counsel informed the court that the parties had amicably settled their dispute outside the courtroom, resulting in the extinguishment of any …
The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar Maurya, filed a criminal revision seeking modification of the interim maintenance amount to align with his financial standing. The petition also asserted that, since the petitioner is now deceased, the revision should be treated as abated. The court considered the …
Salman Khan filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Jhansi dated 7 May 2026 which directed him to pay Rs 10,000 per month as interim maintenance to his wife, Saba Sultana, from 19 November 2025. He contended that the amount was not commensurate …
Upendra Shukla filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs.4,000 per month passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Prayagraj under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. He contended that the amount was not commensurate with his income, no evidence was produced, and …
The petitioners filed a criminal revision, 18 days after the prescribed period, seeking to set aside an ex‑parte order dated 16‑05‑2026 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bareilly under Section 144 of the B.N.S.S. The Court first condoned the delay in filing the revision upon …
The husband filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court's order dated 30.07.2026 in a Section 125(4) CrPC maintenance application filed by his wife. The husband contended that his wife, who was living separately, was engaged in adultery and therefore not entitled to maintenance. No …
The revisionist, Shalu Bachchan, filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court's order dated 09.06.2026 which reduced her interim maintenance from Rs.15,000 to Rs.8,000 per month. She contended that the reduced amount was not commensurate with her husband’s salary of Rs.69,000 and sought a …
Santosh filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court seeking to set aside an ex parte order dated 09‑07‑2025 of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Azamgarh, which partially granted a maintenance application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. and ordered him to pay Rs.4,000 to …
Vimal Bahadur Singh filed a criminal revision challenging an ex‑parte maintenance order of Rs 10,000 per month awarded to Swati Singh, arguing the amount was excessive. The State argued that the appropriate remedy was an application under Section 126(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code or Section …
Sachin Chaurasiya filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Prayagraj Family Court that directed him to pay interim maintenance of Rs.7,000 and Rs.3,000 per month to two opposite parties from the date of the maintenance application (12.01.2026). He expressed willingness to comply but …
Mohd Faizi filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs 7,000 per month dated 30‑07‑2026, issued by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Muzaffarnagar, in a case under Section 144 of the B.N.S.S. and Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued …
The revisionist, a government teacher, challenged a Family Court order granting his wife and daughter maintenance of Rs.16,000 per month, arguing that salary deductions reduced his net income and the amount was excessive. The State contended that the trial court correctly applied the Supreme Court's …
The petitioners, Ajay Lakhera, filed a criminal revision challenging an ex parte maintenance order dated 1 June 2026 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mahoba, under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. They sought quashing and a stay of the order, arguing that the order was …
Anuj Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order dated 06.08.2026 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Aligarh, which directed him to pay Rs.4,500 per month to his wife, Smt. Lata alias Sonam. He contended that the amount was not commensurate with his …
The revisionist Rishal Kumar filed a criminal revision seeking to set aside an order dated 20.01.2026 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bareilly, in a maintenance case. The revisionist indicated that the matter could be resolved within three months and did not wish to press the …
Amit Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order passed by the Family Court, Ghaziabad, which directed him to pay Rs 5,000 per month to his wife and Rs 2,500 to his minor son from 21‑06‑2024. He sought a stay of the arrears and asked the High Court to direct the Family …
Bhuttu @ Insaf (revisionist) challenged an ex parte maintenance order dated 18‑09‑2018 passed under Section 125 CrPC, which had already been recalled on 18‑01‑2020 by a Section 126(2) application. He later filed another Section 126(2) application, dismissed on 08‑09‑2025, and now filed a criminal …
The petitioners, Akash Sonkar, filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order dated 03.01.2025 passed by the Principal Judge of Family Court No.1, Meerut, under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The revision was filed 327 days after the impugned order, prompting a …
Lal Chandra filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 06.03.2026 of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur, which directed maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code in the case Shweta Sen vs Lal Chandra. The revisionist sought to set aside that order and …
The revisionist, Devendra Singh, filed a criminal revision seeking to set aside a family court order dated 09.03.2026 that secured amounts deducted in an execution case. He contended that earlier maintenance orders under Section 125 Cr.P.C. had been enhanced under Section 127 Cr.P.C., and he was …
The petitioners, Nivas Ali and another, filed a writ petition (C No. 34330 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The matter was listed under the "Oldest Pending Cases" priority hearing, but the petitioners failed to appear even after a revised call. The State respondents, …
The applicant sought quashing of the Special Judge's cognizance and summoning order in Complaint Case No.57 of 2025, alleging that the order was passed without granting the accused an opportunity of hearing as mandated by Section 223(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and violated …
The applicant, Ravi alias Ravindra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued on 18‑Oct‑2024 in a trial for offences under Sections 307 and 504 IPC. The High Court examined the procedural …
Ajay Singh, a BSF constable, filed a criminal revision challenging an execution order dated 16.03.2026 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Deoria, which was issued under Section 128 of the Cr.P.C. to enforce an ex parte maintenance order of Rs. 14,000 granted to Shashi …
The revisionist, Sanjiv Kumar Kanaujiya, filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order dated 16 September 2019 that directed him to appear before the court, but he failed to comply. The revision was filed after a delay of 2,251 days, and the revisionist sought condonation of this delay. …
Vibhore Kumar Rastogi filed a criminal revision challenging a judgment of the Judicial Magistrate dated 10 September 2025 under Section 23 of the Domestic Violence Act. The revisionist sought condonation of a 70‑day delay in filing the revision and later requested to withdraw the revision in favour …
The revisionist filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order dated 18.08.2025 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghazipur, under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The revision was filed 85 days late, and a delay condonation application was made. The …
Amit Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging a family court order dated 25.02.2026 that imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 on him under section 126(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. He sought a partial setting aside of the order and a stay of the cost pending the revision, alleging irreparable loss. …
The applicant, Smt. Hasina Khatoon, sought maintenance of Rs.2.64 lakh under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, after the husband repeatedly defaulted on payments despite an interim order of Rs.8,000 per month. The husband was sent to civil prison for non‑payment, but the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.1547 of 2018) arising from Crime No.122 of 2013, which involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 379, 489 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 5 of the SC/ST …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) in Moradabad to conclude Criminal Case No. 254 of 2013 (State vs. Sandeep Khanna) expeditiously. The applicant argued that the trial was pending …
The applicants, Pooja Goswami and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 5 September 2024, the summons and cognizance order dated 7 October 2024, and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.14530 of 2024) …
The applicants and the State entered into an amicable settlement regarding offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC arising from Crime No. 4931 of 2017. They filed a compromise application before the trial court, which was verified and reported to the High Court. Relying on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quash of a charge sheet and stay of proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 307, 504, 506, 354A, 354B IPC and the D.P. Act. The parties had amicably settled the dispute and filed a …
The applicants, Prashanter Dhama and others, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Case No.33361 of 2023) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, which involved offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 354‑Ka and D.P. Act …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.17617 of 2022) arising from offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 324, 504 and 506. The parties had amicably settled their dispute and filed a compromise application …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summons dated 13.01.2021 and stay the criminal proceedings (sections 354A, 323 and 406 IPC) in Complaint No. 3813 of 2020 (Sweta Singh v. Abhishek Singh). The parties had amicably settled the dispute and filed a …
The application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (No. 10191 of 2021) was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petitioners, Smt. Munni Devi and three others, were represented by counsel Jitendra Kumar Ravat, but none of them appeared before the court. The …
