Disposed Off
Varad Developers filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, against Shr. Mohan Shankar More and others. The appellant, through its authorized representative, submitted a letter stating that it no longer wished to pursue the appeal and sought an unconditional withdrawal. …
Disposed Off
The petitioners, Pramod Vitthal Kamble and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking direction to the State of Maharashtra and related authorities to act on a representation dated 8 October 2025 concerning an increase in gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The …
Dismissed
The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and criminal appeals under the caption “Spare Copies Not Supplied”. The court directed the learned advocate for the petitioner/appellant/applicant to furnish spare copies of the pleadings within ten days to the …
Disposed Off
The petitioners challenged an order of the Deputy Director of Education, Kolhapur Division, which rejected a proposal on the ground that the petitioner had not produced a minority status certificate. The petitioners relied on a prior judgment (Writ Petition No.11856 of 2024) that held an approved …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Subhash Harishing Shiledar, challenged the District Caste Scrutiny Committee’s order rejecting his claim that he belongs to the "Rajput Bhamta" caste, seeking a remand for fresh adjudication. He relied on a school record of his alleged paternal aunt showing the "Rajput Bhamta" caste, …
Disposed Off
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the State to decide an appeal they had filed on 20 February 2025 under Section 47 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, challenging a municipal council order dated 21 January 2025. …
Disposed Off
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking correction of a typographical error in the order dated 18‑03‑2026, which mistakenly stated that they were entitled to revise their pension. They contended that the correct intention was to grant them benefits of an additional salary increment. The Court …
Disposed Off
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking correction of a typographical error in the order dated 18‑03‑2026, which mistakenly stated that they were entitled to revise their pension. They contended that the correct intention was to grant them benefits of an additional salary increment. The Court …
Disposed Off
The petitioners, Raghunath Tanaji Dalvi and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking correction of a prior order dated 18 March 2026. They requested that specific wording in paragraph 3 be altered: the phrase “to get revise their pension” was to be changed to “to get …
Disposed Off
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking correction of a typographical error in the order dated 18‑03‑2026, which mistakenly stated that they were entitled to revise their pension. They contended that the correct intention was to grant them benefits of an additional salary increment. The Court …
Disposed Off
Shivamma Yallappa Potenavaru filed a writ petition seeking to quash a government resolution that declared Anjali Yoginath Bajaramath as President of Maindargi Municipal Council following the 2025 municipal election. The petitioner argued the election was invalid, while the respondent argued that …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Kiran Tanaji Katte, obtained a sanad under Section 44(A) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 and consent from the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board to operate a stone crusher on his property in Satara. He also secured a licence under Section 71(3)(c) of the Maharashtra Minor …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Sambhaji Kallappa Patil, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction that Respondents 3 and 4 complete a re‑audit of Respondent No.5 under Section 81(6) of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1961 within 30 days, as ordered on 15 October 2025 by the District Deputy …
Disposed Off
The New Education Society filed a writ petition alleging that the Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, Maharashtra, had not acted on a recommendation dated 15 November 2024 to include its employees in the "Sevarth Pranali" scheme, causing loss of monetary benefits. The petitioners had been …
Disposed Off
The petitioners, who are Assistant Teachers employed by the Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur, filed writ petitions seeking an additional salary increment as prescribed in a Government Resolution dated 31 December 1989. They contended that their service records demonstrated eligibility for the increment. The …
Disposed Off
Kashiling Majur Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. filed Writ Petition No. 1218 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Suryajeet P. Chavan, sought to withdraw the writ petition while …
Allowed To be withdrawn
The Divisional Manager of The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Satara filed an appeal before the High Court, Kolhapur Bench, but subsequently submitted a withdrawal petition indicating a desire to discontinue the appeal. The Court considered the request and, after due consideration, granted leave to …
Disposed Off
Sunil Vithhal Ranjane applied for anticipatory bail in connection with offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant contended that, as per the Supreme Court’s decision in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, a notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya …
Disposed Off
The petitioners challenged the issuance of a show‑cause notice dated 27 March 2026 by the Tehsildar, Hatkanagale, alleging that it was not issued in accordance with the procedure prescribed under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The High Court examined whether the notice complied …
Disposed off as Withdrawn
The petitioner, Uday Shivaji Jagtap, filed Writ Petition No. 1911 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging actions of the District Collector, Solapur. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel Ms. Isha Patil, sought to withdraw the petition. The respondents, …
Disposed Off
The petitioners, a group of private educational institutions, challenged two Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid on the ground of alleged non‑compliance with assessment norms. The State argued that the institutions could apply …
Disposed Off
The appellant, a teacher appointed on a temporary basis, challenged his termination dated 26 November 2001, alleging the appointment was illegal. The School Tribunal held that he was appointed in the science stream to a post reserved for a Scheduled Caste candidate, whereas the vacancy created by a …
Disposed Off
The petitioners filed a review petition 270 days after the original order, seeking condonation of delay. They alleged that the Sub‑Divisional Officer, relying on a notice issued under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, was about to evict and demolish their premises without granting …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Udaysingh, who has been incarcerated for 15 years, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the Deputy Inspector General of Prisons' order that required a cash surety of Rs.5,00,000 along with a personal bond of the same amount and two guarantors for regular parole on marriage …
Disposed Off
The appellant, Shri Arvind Bhairu Patil, and respondent No.3 appeared before the Lok Adalat with their advocates and signed a consent settlement. The parties agreed that the Assurance Company would deposit Rs.19,00,000 within six weeks of the order, to be paid before the Motor Accident Claim …
Disposed Off
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed a pursis indicating its desire to withdraw the appeal it had lodged against Mr. Balaso Raghunath Patil and another. The court recorded the withdrawal request and marked it for identification. The panel, after noting the withdrawal, disposed of the appeal as …
Disposed Off
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed a pursis indicating its desire to withdraw the appeal it had lodged against Mr. Balaso Raghunath Patil and another. The court recorded the withdrawal request and marked it for identification. The panel, after noting the withdrawal, disposed of the appeal as …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Bhimashankar Suryakant Irshetti, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to respondent No.3 to forward a proposal for granting a Shalarth ID to respondent No.4, and further to compel respondent No.4 to decide on the proposal. The Attorney General for the State submitted that …
Dismissed
The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and criminal appeals under the caption “Spare Copies Not Supplied”. The court directed the learned advocate for the petitioner/appellant/applicant to furnish spare copies of the pleadings within ten days to the …
Dismissed
The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and criminal appeals under the caption “Spare Copies Not Supplied”. The court directed the learned advocate for the petitioner/appellant/applicant to furnish spare copies of the pleadings within ten days to the …
Disposed Off
The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., appeared before the National Lok Adalat in the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, and, through its administrative officer, declared that it did not wish to prosecute the appeal. The Lok Adalat, upon receiving this statement, granted permission …
Disposed Off
Datta Panchayatan and others filed a writ petition (No. 7323 of 2000) before the Bombay High Court against Maruti Malu Salunkhe and others. The petitioners sought relief, but the court found that they had not prosecuted the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition for …
Allowed To be withdrawn
The appellants, Narku Nayaku Chougule and another, filed an appeal before the National Lok Adalat Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. During the hearing, the appellant's administrative officer, Mr. Sagar Tukaram Samant, expressed that the appeal should not be prosecuted. The court permitted the appellants …
Disposed Off
The authorized officer of New India Assurance Co. appeared before the National Lok Adalat and declared that the company would not prosecute the appeal. The Lok Adalat granted permission for withdrawal, and the appeal was disposed of as withdrawn. The respondents were ordered to withdraw the claim …
Allowed To be withdrawn
Kolhapur Auto Works Pvt. Ltd and another filed a writ petition (No. 5313 of 2023) before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging actions of the Union of India and others. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Jitendra N. Somaiya, while the respondents were represented by Mr. …
Disposed Off
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging a decision involving claimants Mrs. Deepa Pramod Darade & Ors. The appellant's counsel communicated a withdrawal of the appeal. The Court accordingly disposed of …
Disposed Off
The Administrative Officer of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed a pursis before the Lok Adalat indicating that the company no longer wishes to prosecute its appeal (First Appeal No. 1207 of 2015) and seeks permission to withdraw it. The panel recorded the pursis and, applying procedural law, …
Disposed Off
The petitioners, who are District/State Awardee Teachers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the release of an additional increment and related arrears as per the Government Resolution dated 12 December 2000. The State of Maharashtra had later issued a Resolution on 4 September 2014 and …
Disposed Off
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal against a decree involving Smt. Vanita Sharad Waghmare and others. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel and an authorized officer informed the court that the insurance company was not willing to prosecute the appeal. The court therefore …
Disposed Off
The appellant, M/s Mukesh Traders, and the respondent, Shivaji Ananda Patil & Anr., appeared in person before the Bombay High Court’s Kolhapur Circuit Bench and submitted self‑attested Aadhaar cards for identification. Both parties stated that the dispute had been amicably settled and the appellant …
Disposed Off
The appellant, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd., appeared before the Lok Adalat and, through its counsel, expressed that it did not wish to pursue the appeal. The panel granted permission, disposing of the appeal as withdrawn. The respondents were ordered to withdraw the claimed amount with …
Disposed Off
The petitioners, senior medical professionals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking declaration that they are entitled to salary scales dating from 1986, 1996 and 2006, as well as payment of arrears and a non‑practicing allowance. They relied on a 2017 coordinate bench …
Allowed
The applicants filed an interim application in a first appeal before the Bombay High Court, seeking relief despite a delay of 357 days in filing the appeal. The respondent, New India Assurance Company Limited, strongly opposed the application. The court examined whether the delay warranted dismissal …
Disposed Off
The National Insurance Co. Ltd., the appellant, informed the court that it no longer wished to pursue the appeal filed against Deepa @ Deepali Dilip Gawas and others. The court granted permission for the withdrawal, disposed of the appeal as withdrawn, and directed that the claimants may recover the …
Dismissed
The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and criminal appeals under the caption “Spare Copies Not Supplied”. The court directed the learned advocate for the petitioner/appellant/applicant to furnish spare copies of the pleadings within ten days to the …
Disposed Off
The petitioners alleged that land (Gat No. 49, 1.63 hectares) in Mouza Khandali was taken into possession by the Deputy Collector for construction of a percolation tank without any acquisition proceeding. They sought a directive for acquisition of the land and payment of compensation with interest …
Disposed Off
The petitioners alleged that several land parcels in Mouza Shetphal, Solapur were taken into possession by the Deputy Collector for the construction of Percolation Tank No.11 without any formal acquisition. They sought a directive for the authorities to acquire the land and pay compensation with …
Disposed Off
The petitioners alleged that land parcels totaling 2.93 hectares in Daingadewadi village were taken into possession by the Deputy Collector for the construction of a percolation tank without any acquisition proceeding. They sought a court direction to acquire the land and pay compensation with …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Sunil Suresh Hubale, was appointed as a teacher on 10 December 2024, but his proposal for approval was rejected by the Education Officer on 23 June 2025 relying on a communication from the Director of Education dated 28 May 2025. The petitioner challenged the rejection, arguing that …
Disposed Off
The petitioners, Pandurang and others, filed a writ petition challenging a grievance against the State of Maharashtra and its education department. The petition sought relief concerning an order issued by the Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur. The respondents filed a revised order on 14 November 2025, issued …
Allowed To be withdrawn
The appellant, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited, filed a first appeal before the National Lok Adalat Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. Subsequently, the appellant filed a pursis to withdraw the appeal through its authorized officer, which was recorded by the court. The court accepted the …
Disposed Off
The appellant, Atul Hiralal Vora, filed a Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) challenging an order dated 26 August 2011 that granted the sixth respondent six weeks to produce a certificate issued by the Commissioner under the third proviso of Section 30(1) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923. The order …
Disposed Off
The applicant, Maruti Rajaram Mohite, filed an appeal against his conviction before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. The appeal was filed 7 days later than the statutory period permitted for filing. An interim application was made seeking condonation of this delay. The court …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Suvarna Vishwas Kumbhar, challenged the Education Officer's order dated 22 July 2025 that rejected his individual approval proposal, alleging that the order was passed without granting him a hearing. The petitioner argued that, if given an opportunity, he and the school management …
Disposed Off
Petitioner Uday Jagtap was appointed as a peon in a minority‑run school in August 2017. The school sought approval of the appointment from the Education Officer, who rejected it on 24 June 2022, relying on a Government Resolution dated 11 December 2020 that declared the post of non‑teaching staff …
Disposed Off
Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the writ petition and requested liberty to institute a civil suit for appropriate reliefs. The Court considered the …
Allowed To be withdrawn
Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the writ petition and requested liberty to institute a civil suit for appropriate reliefs. The Court …
Disposed Off
The applicant filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 28‑day delay in filing a Family Court appeal. The respondents opposed the application, arguing that the delay was unacceptable. The court examined the reasons for the delay and, despite the opposition, decided to allow the …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Mueen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the order dated 17 January 2025 of the Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Pune, which rejected his application for furlough leave. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the order was based on the Maharashtra Prisons …
Dismissed
The dispute concerned the ad‑hoc fee for a postgraduate medical course for the 2024‑25 academic year at Prakash Shikshan Mandal. The institution claimed it could set the fee, while the student petitioners and the Fee Regulating Authority (FRA) argued that the fee must be determined by the FRA under …
Disposed Off
The petitioners, teachers, filed writ petitions seeking direction to the Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) of their respective Zilla Parishads to decide pending representations concerning a government scheme that allows husband and wife teachers to be posted at the same station or within 30 km. They …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Deepak Lakshman Supugade, filed an interim application seeking restoration of Writ Petition (Stamp) No.15646 of 2024, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution by orders dated 16 August 2024 and 2 September 2024. The court examined whether a dismissed petition could be revived …
Disposed Off
The petitioners, teachers, filed writ petitions seeking direction to the Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) of their respective Zilla Parishads to decide pending representations concerning a government scheme that allows husband and wife teachers to be posted at the same station or within 30 km. They …
Dismissed
The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and criminal appeals under the caption “Spare Copies Not Supplied”. The court directed the learned advocate for the petitioner/appellant/applicant to furnish spare copies of the pleadings within ten days to the …
Allowed To be withdrawn
The petitioner, Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP, filed a writ petition seeking correction of the minutes of an order dated 04.03.2026, as the appearance of counsel for Respondents Nos.2 and 3 was omitted. Respondents Nos.2 and 3 submitted a praecipe on 07.03.2026 requesting that the court record the …
Allowed To be withdrawn
Petitioners Prakash Shikshan Mandal and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, the petitioners, through their counsel, applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court examined the …
Disposed Off
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Divisional Commissioner of Pune to decide a complaint filed under Section 39(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. A Division Bench ordered the Commissioner to decide the complaint, but the petitioners alleged …
Disposed Off
The petitioners, Manisha Abasaheb Gite and others, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the Education Officer (Secondary) of Zilla Parishad, Solapur, to decide a proposal dated 9 December 2024 that had remained pending. The petition was limited to obtaining an expeditious decision …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Arif Amajadkhan Pathan, challenged a notice terminating his weighman licence upon reaching the age of 58 under the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) bye‑laws. He argued that the age restriction is inapplicable to him because he is covered by the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal …
Disposed off as Withdrawn
Disposed Off
Sambhaji Aaba Karande filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the legality of an order dated 7 December 2022 issued by the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) No.6, Kolhapur. Both parties consented to dispose of the petition, and the High Court quashed the impugned order and remanded the …
Allowed To be withdrawn
The petitioner, Abhimanyu Rutuja Rajesh Rathye, filed a writ petition seeking relief. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner obtained individual approval for the relief sought, rendering the petition infructuous. Counsel for the petitioner moved that the petition be withdrawn on this …
Disposed Off
The dispute concerned the determination of ad‑hoc fees for a postgraduate medical course for the 2024‑25 academic year at Prakash Shikshan Mandal. The institute claimed it could set the fees, while the students and the Fee Regulating Authority (FRA) argued that the FRA alone had the authority to fix …