Created by Fuzzy Cloud

R BANUMATHI

189 judgments · newest first · showing 1–189

MUSTAK @ KANIO AHMED SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2020 INSC 435Dismissed

The appellant, Mustak @ Kanio Ahmed Shaikh, was convicted for attempting to murder Dr. Jaydeep Patel by shooting him from a motorcycle he was driving, with his accomplice as the pillion rider. The prosecution proved the case through eye‑witness identification (the victim and his driver), a test …

D. DEVARAJAversusOWAIS SABEER HUSSAIN

2020 INSC 436Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior police officer, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash a private complaint (PCR No.17214 of 2013) that alleged police excesses while the respondent was in custody during an investigation. The magistrate had taken cognizance of the complaint without …

RANA NAHID @ RESHMA @ SANA & ANR.versusSAHIDUL HAQ CHISTI

2020 INSC 432Disposed off

A Muslim couple divorced; the wife filed a petition under Section 125 of the CrPC for maintenance, which the Family Court converted into an application under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 and ordered maintenance. The High Court set aside the conversion, …

SURENDRA KUMAR BHILAWEversusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

2020 INSC 434Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Surendra Kumar Bhilawe, owned an Ashok Leyland truck that was insured by New India Assurance. The truck was involved in a serious accident in November 2011, and the appellant filed a claim for the loss. The insurer denied the claim, alleging that the vehicle had been sold in 2008 to …

PATEL ENGINEERING LTD.versusNORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. (NEEPCO)

2020 INSC 403Dismissed

Patel Engineering Ltd. challenged three arbitral awards dated 29‑03‑2016 concerning payment for extra lead under a contract with North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Ltd. (NEEPCO). NEEPCO filed applications under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; the Additional Deputy …

MOHD. ASIF NASEERversusWEST WATCH COMPANY THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR

2020 INSC 363Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord, Mohd. Asif Naseer, purchased a shop and sought its release under Section 21(1)(a) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, claiming a bona‑fide need for personal use and having given six months' notice to the tenant. The tenant …

DR. THINGUJAM ACHOUBA SINGH & ORS.versusDR. H. NABACHANDRA SINGH & ORS. ETC.

2020 INSC 342Appeal(s) allowed

The Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), a society under the Societies Registration Act, issued an advertisement on 16‑08‑2016 for the post of Director. Three writ petitions challenged the advertisement on grounds of lack of age‑relaxation, alleged non‑conformity of experience requirements …

PAWAN KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2020 INSC 324Dismissed

Pawan Kumar Gupta, convicted of a capital offence, filed a mercy petition with the President of India which was rejected. He challenged the rejection through a writ petition under Articles 32 and 72 of the Constitution, contending that his claim of juvenility had not been finally decided, that he …

AKSHAY KUMAR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 312Dismissed

Akshay Kumar Singh, a convict in the Nirbhaya case, filed a mercy petition with the President of India, which was rejected on 19 March 2020. He subsequently filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the rejection, alleging miscarriage of justice, solitary confinement, torture, media …

MUKESHversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2020 INSC 311Dismissed

Mukesh, a convicted participant in the Nirbhaya case, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the merits of his conviction and a series of subsequent orders, including the High Court's upholding of the conviction, a review petition, a curative petition, a mercy …

SHYAM SAHNIversusARJUN PRAKASH AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 319Appeal(s) allowed

Shyam Sahni filed a civil suit seeking declaration, possession, injunction and partition of property inherited from his mother. Respondent No.1 (Arjun Prakash) and his father created an equitable mortgage on the property to secure a bank loan and repeatedly failed to honour undertakings to clear the …

SAJANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 302Case Partly allowed

The appellants, a partnership firm operating a sugar mill, challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired for the Hiwra Dam project, arguing that the market value of the land and the deductions for development costs were incorrectly determined by the High Court. The Supreme Court examined the …

MANKASTU IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITEDversusAIRVISUAL LIMITED

2020 INSC 284Dismissed

The petitioner, Mankastu Impex Private Limited, an Indian distributor of air‑quality monitors, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with AirVisual Limited, a Hong Kong company, appointing it as exclusive distributor in India. After AirVisual was acquired by IQAir AG, which refused to honour …

UCO BANKversusNATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

2020 INSC 282Case Partly allowed

UCO Bank (appellant) sought recovery of a large sum from Shree Sitaram Mills Ltd. and its successor National Textile Corporation Ltd. (NTC) after the mill was taken over and nationalised under the Textile Undertakings (Take‑over of Management) Act, 1983 and the Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) …

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusM. V. MOHANAN NAIR

2020 INSC 281Disposed off

The Union of India appealed against several High Court orders that had granted employees financial upgradation in the grade‑pay of the next promotional hierarchy under the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme, relying on the Raj Pal judgment. The respondents argued that MACP should be …

N. C. SANTHOSHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2020 INSC 273Dismissed

The appellants, who had been appointed on compassionate grounds after the death of their parents, challenged the cancellation of their appointments, arguing that the pre‑amendment rules allowing a minor to apply within one year of attaining majority should apply. The Karnataka Administrative …

CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONERversusHIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER.

2020 INSC 269Dismissed

The Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) directed the Gujarat High Court to provide certified copies of judicial documents to a third‑party applicant under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act). The High Court, relying on Rule 151 of its own Rules, required the applicant to file an affidavit …

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE ANDversusAKHALAQ HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER

2020 INSC 256Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents Akhlaq Hussain and Saqir Hussain exchanged a small parcel of land for a larger agricultural parcel owned by Mangal Singh, a member of a Scheduled Tribe, through a registered deed. The Assistant Collector declared the exchange void under Sections 157‑B and 161 of the U.P. Zamindari …

K. VIRUPAKSHA & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

2020 INSC 261Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, two senior bank officials, challenged a criminal complaint filed under Section 200 of the CrPC alleging that they colluded with an auction purchaser to cause wrongful loss to the borrower, K. Virupaksha, after the bank invoked the SARFAESI Act to enforce a secured loan of Rs.2.68 …

MANGAYARKARASIversusM. YUVARAJ

2020 INSC 259Appeal(s) allowed

The husband filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking dissolution of his marriage on the ground of the wife's intemperate behaviour, while the wife filed a petition under Section 9 for restitution of conjugal rights. The trial court dismissed the husband's petition for lack …

VINAY SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 184Dismissed

Vinay Sharma, a death‑row convict in the Nirbhaya case, filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the President's rejection of his mercy petition on grounds of alleged non‑consideration of relevant documents, torture, mental illness, illegal solitary confinement and bias. The petition also …

CHANDIGARH CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTDversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2020 INSC 187Case Partly allowed

The contractor, Chandigarh Construction Co., entered into a contract with the State of Punjab for construction of the Sutlej Yamuna Link Canal and later claimed additional payment for extra work. An arbitrator awarded the claims using a 93.12% premium and 18% interest, but did not give reasons as …

BALWANT SINGH (D) THR. LR.versusDUNGAR SINGH (D) THR. LRS.

2020 INSC 172Disposed off

The brothers Balwant Singh and Dungar Singh disputed the partition of their father’s property and, by mutual consent, appointed three close relatives as arbitrators under an agreement dated 23‑11‑1981. The arbitrators passed a detailed award allocating houses, land, jewellery and cash, which was …

RAJESHBHAI MULJIBHAI PATEL AND OTHERS ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER ETC.

2020 INSC 160Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, brothers residing in the UK, sought recovery of Rs.1.20 crore from their maternal uncle (appellant No.3) after the uncle advanced the sum for a land sale and later demanded repayment. The uncle issued four cheques, two of which were dishonoured; a criminal complaint under Section 138 …

NITESH KUMAR PANDEYversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.

2020 INSC 151Dismissed

The Madhya Pradesh State Employment Guarantee Parishad issued guidelines on 2 June 2012 for appointing Gram Rojgar Sahayaks under MGNREGS, specifying compulsory qualifications and a desired computer exam pass from listed institutions with assigned marks. The Collector of Rewa issued a Revised Time …

BHARAT COKING COAL LTD. & ORS.versusSHYAM KISHORE SINGH

2020 INSC 136Appeal(s) allowed

Shyam Kishore Singh was appointed as a trainee with Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. in 1982, where his date of birth was entered as 04-03-1950 in the service register. He later claimed that his true date of birth was 20-01-1955, as shown on his matriculation certificate, and sought a correction in 2009, …

BASHEERA BEGAMversusMOHAMMED IBRAHIM & ORS.

2020 INSC 116Dismissed

The case concerned the alleged murder of D2 and D1 in December 1990, for which eight accused were convicted under sections 120B, 302 and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence – a lorry purchase, broken glass, alleged iron‑rod attacks and a purported conspiracy at a hotel – …

MUKESH KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 103Dismissed

Mukesh Kumar, a death‑row convict in the Nirbhaya gang‑rape case, filed a mercy petition under Articles 72 and 161 of the Constitution, which was rejected by the Lieutenant Governor on 15 January 2020 and by the President on 17 January 2020. He challenged the rejection before the Supreme Court, …

KASHMIRA DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

2020 INSC 99Appeal(s) allowed

The victim, Urmila (Guddi), was married into a family that repeatedly demanded additional dowry and subjected her to physical and mental cruelty. After returning to her parental home due to harassment, she was burnt under suspicious circumstances and later died, leading to three dying …

SUKHWINDER SINGHversusJAGROOP SINGH & ANR.

2020 INSC 100Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff entered into an agreement of sale on 03‑01‑2004 with defendant No.1 for a plot of land at Rs 1,40,000, paying Rs 69,500 as earnest money. The plaintiff sued for specific performance and to set aside a later sale deed dated 11‑06‑2004 executed by defendant No.1 in favour of defendant …

SHYAMLAL DEVDA AND OTHERSversusPARIMALA

2020 INSC 77Appeal(s) allowed

The marriage between the respondent and appellant No.14 was solemnised in Rajasthan, after which the couple lived in Chennai. In 2014 the respondent travelled to Bengaluru for her sister's wedding and subsequently refused to return to the matrimonial home, alleging domestic violence by her husband, …

PAWAN KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2020 INSC 55Dismissed

Pawan Kumar Gupta, an accused in the Nirbhaya case, claimed he was a juvenile at the time of the offence on the basis of a school leaving certificate showing a birth date of 08‑10‑1996. He sought an enquiry under Section 7A of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, but the …

PADUM KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2020 INSC 37Appeal(s) allowed

Padum Kumar, a postman, delivered a registered envelope containing four Indira Vikas Patras (Rs.20,000) on 09‑04‑1992, which was never received by the complainant, Dr. K.B. Varshney. The delivery slip bore the signature "D. Mohan"; the complainant's son, Devesh Mohan, denied that the signature was …

AKSHAY KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2019 INSC 1411Dismissed

The case concerns the conviction and death sentence of Akshay Kumar Singh, a bus cleaner, for his participation in the gang rape and murder of a young woman on a Delhi bus (the Nirbhaya case). Singh filed a criminal review petition challenging the Supreme Court's 2017 judgment that upheld his …

G H M/S GENENTECH INC. & ORS.versusDRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 1391Appeal(s) allowed

Genentech Inc., Roche Products (India) and F. Hoffmann‑La Roche filed a suit in the Delhi High Court seeking to restrain Reliance Life Sciences from launching its biosimilar product ‘TrastuRel’, alleging improper use of data and passing off. The Single Judge of the High Court, on 25 April 2016, …

UNIVERSITY OF DELHIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 1389Dismissed

The University of Delhi challenged the conversion of land acquired for the Delhi Metro project into a residential housing scheme, filing a writ petition that was dismissed for delay and laches. The University later filed a Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) 916 days after the writ petition’s disposal, …

SHYAM MADAN MOHAN RUIA & ORS.versusMESSER HOLDINGS LIMITED & ORS.

2019 INSC 1370Disposed off

The appellants (Ruias) entered into a settlement on 5 December 2002 transferring 75,001 shares of Bombay Oxygen Investments Ltd. to them. Respondent No.1 (Messer Holdings Ltd.) filed Suit No. 2410 of 2008 seeking to cancel the settlement and claimed ownership of the shares, raising a limitation …

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERSversusSUDARSHANA CHATTERJEE

2019 INSC 1350Appeal(s) allowed

Sudharshana Chatterjee, a lecturer in Uttar Pradesh (UP), applied for a post in Chhattisgarh and, while her leave request was pending, joined the Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Sciences (CIMS) and drew salary from both states. After retiring from CIMS, she claimed gratuity, pension and leave …

P. CHIDAMBARAMversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2019 INSC 1317Appeal(s) allowed

The Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram was implicated in a CBI‑filed FIR and a subsequent Enforcement Directorate money‑laundering case, though he was not named as an accused. After his arrest, he sought regular bail under CrPC s.439, which the Delhi High Court denied on grounds of alleged …

STATE OF ODISHA & ORS.versusMANJU NAIK

2019 INSC 1316Appeal(s) allowed

The widow of a government employee who retired on grounds of mental incapacity sought, after 14 years, fixation of pay and family pension, but never claimed invalid pension. The Odisha Administrative Tribunal ordered an invalid pension under Rule 39 of the Orissa Civil Services (Pension) Rules, …

BHAWNA BAIversusGHANSHYAM AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 1313Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Bhawna Bai complained that her husband was found dead in the field of the first respondent, Ghanshyam, who allegedly prevented her from reaching the body. An FIR was eventually registered under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and the trial court framed charges against the …

ODISHA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.versusM/S ANUPAM TRADERS & ANR.

2019 INSC 1296Case Partly allowed

The Odisha Forest Development Corporation Ltd. (OFDC) issued an e‑tender for the sale of phal Kendu leaves. The successful bidder, M/s Anupam Traders, paid the provisional security deposit but failed to pay the additional security amount (25% of the purchase price) by the stipulated deadline, …

JAI PRAKASHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 1294Dismissed

The case concerned the murder of Ravi Prakash, alleged to have been committed by accused Nos.1, 2 and 4 under Sections 302 and 120B IPC. The trial court convicted the three accused based on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses and medical evidence, but the High Court acquitted them, finding material …

THE ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.versusPRANJAL KUMAR SARMA & ORS.

2019 INSC 1297Appeal(s) allowed

The Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) advertised 65 Assistant Engineer (Civil) posts on 21‑12‑2018 and conducted a screening test on 30‑06‑2019 under the 2010 Rules, which did not provide for negative marking. The APSC later introduced a new 2019 Procedure effective 01‑04‑2019, containing …

V. RAJARAMversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CBI/SCB

2019 INSC 1282Appeal(s) allowed

In May 2007 a protest turned violent at the Dinakaran newspaper office, resulting in arson and the death of three employees. The Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Rajaram, who was on bandobust duty, was charged under Sections 217 and 221 of the IPC for allegedly disobeying orders and …

N. MOHANversusR. MADHU

2019 INSC 1270Disposed off

The appellant, a businessman, was ordered to repay Rs.45,00,000 borrowed from the respondent, but failed to do so, leading to an ex‑parte decree in the respondent's suit. The appellant first sought to set aside the decree via an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, which was dismissed, and later …

K. MEGHACHANDRA SINGH & ORS.versusNINGAM SIRO & ORS.

2019 INSC 1260Disposed off

The case concerned an inter‑se seniority dispute in the Manipur Police Service (MPS) Grade‑II cadre between promotees (appointed by promotion on 01‑03‑2007) and direct recruits (appointed on 14‑08‑2007 and 24‑11‑2007). The promotees argued that seniority should be based on the date of appointment as …

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONversusJAWAHAR SANTHKUMAR AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 1253Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the promotion of Jawahar Santkhumar to the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) for the 2004 selection year. A Selection Committee, under the IAS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, classified him as "Good" and did not include him in the Select List because only three …

SANTOSH CHATURVEDIversusKAILASH CHANDRA & ANR.

2019 INSC 1252Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Santosh Chaturvedi, filed a petition under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 seeking release of a shop premises occupied by the respondents. The prescribed authority dismissed the petition on the ground that the appellant …

UNION OF INDIAversusPRADEEP VINOD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

2019 INSC 1241Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India (Railways) awarded civil engineering contracts to Pradeep Vinod Construction Company, which later claimed additional payments despite having signed final bills and supplementary agreements indicating full settlement. The contractor invoked the arbitration clause in Clause 64 of …

M/S VIJAY TRADING AND TRANSPORT COMPANYversusCENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION

2019 INSC 1215Dismissed

The appellant, Vijay Trading and Transport Co., entered into a two‑year handling and transportation contract with Central Warehousing Corporation. The contract was terminated by the corporation for the appellant’s failure to deliver an export‑loaded container to the port at Navi Mumbai, leading to …

RAVINDRA SINGHversusDISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS AND ORS.

2019 INSC 1207Dismissed

The appellant, a teacher, was appointed by the Management of a government‑aided private college to fill a substantive vacancy without complying with the procedure laid down in paragraph 5 of the First Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Commission (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1981. He …

GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS.versusPRADEEP KUMAR & ORS.

2019 INSC 1189Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi government advertised vacancies for Special Education Teachers requiring CTET qualification. Several OBC candidates from other states obtained CTET marks by availing a 5% relaxation in the pass criteria and applied for the OBC reserved posts, but were rejected because they did not possess …

PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITEDversusGO AIRLINES (INDIA) LIMITED

2019 INSC 1183Dismissed

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL) supplied aviation fuel to Go Airlines under two supply agreements (2007‑2009 and 2009‑2011). BPCL claimed interest on delayed payments and invoked the arbitration clause, while Go Airlines raised two counter‑claims, one seeking CENVAT credit invoices. The …

THE STATE OF MANIPUR & ORS.versusKOTING LAMKANG

2019 INSC 1182Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Manipur and other authorities filed a regular first appeal (RFA) against a decree ordering them to vacate strategic land, but the appeal was initially filed before the wrong forum (District Judge) and delayed by about eleven months. The High Court rejected the State's application to …

SHRI P. CHIDAMBARAMversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2019 INSC 1176Disposed off

The Central Bureau of Investigation filed a case against former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram under Sections 120B, 420 IPC and Sections 8, 13(2), 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for alleged irregularities in the FIPB clearance of INX Media. After his arrest, the Delhi High Court …

ONGC LABOUR UNIONversusONGC DEHRADUN & ORS.

2019 INSC 1154

The Central Government issued a notification on 08‑09‑1994 under Section 10(1) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 prohibiting contract labour in several categories of work in ONGC establishments. ONGC challenged the notification before the Uttarakhand High Court, which …

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusARVIND KHANNA

2019 INSC 1152Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a criminal case against Arvind Khanna for receiving Rs 9.04 crore from eight foreign entities without prior government permission, alleging violation of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) 1976. The trial court took cognizance under the …

DR. LAKSHMANversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2019 INSC 1153Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Lakshman entered into agreements with several respondents to procure 70 acres of land for a payment of Rs 9 crore. The respondents allegedly sold the land before the agreement, issued cheques that later bounced, and forced the appellant to sign sale deeds, leading to complaints under the IPC for …

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LTD.versusK. S. INFRASPACE LLP & ANR.

2019 INSC 1135Dismissed

Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. filed a suit in the Vadodara Commercial Court seeking specific performance of a mortgage deed concerning a parcel of land. The respondents contended that the dispute did not fall within the definition of a "commercial dispute" under Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of the …

ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusM/S TEJPARAS ASSOCIATES EXPORTS PVT. LTD.

2019 INSC 1112Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Oriental Insurance filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in the Jaipur District Court to set aside an arbitral award, but the court returned the petition for presentation before the Jodhpur court, fixing 2 April 2008 as the date of …

OKHLA ENCLAVE PLOT HOLDERS’ WELFARE ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 1110Directions issued

The Okhla Enclave Plot Holders’ Welfare Association filed a writ petition alleging that the Colonizer (Durga Builders Pvt Ltd) failed to honour the terms of the plot‑allotment agreement and that many allottees had not paid the development charges required by the Supreme Court. The Court referred …

M/S. CANARA NIDHI LIMITEDversusM. SHASHIKALA AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 1068Appeal(s) allowed

Canara Nidhi Ltd. advanced a Rs.50 lakh loan secured by mortgage and a demand promissory note, which the borrower M. Shashikala failed to repay, leading to an arbitral award of Rs.63.82 lakh. Shashikala filed an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside …

DAGDU KHOMANE AND ANOTHERversusEKNATH BHIKU YADAV & ORS.

2019 INSC 1052Dismissed

The dispute concerned six acres of land belonging to the Maruti Dev Temple, which had been let out to tenants who, on Tillers' Day (1 April 1957), became deemed purchasers under Section 32 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The temple trust was registered as a public trust under …

P. CHIDAMBARAMversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2019 INSC 1010Dismissed

The appellant, former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, was charged with alleged irregularities in a foreign investment clearance and money‑laundering offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Prevention of Money‑Laundering Act (PMLA). The Enforcement Directorate (ED) produced a sealed …

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT, JODHPUR & ANR.versusNEETU HARSH & ANR.

2019 INSC 978Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan High Court had directed the state to consider a candidate, who had applied for a Civil Judge post as a General category applicant and paid the general fee, for one of the two vacancies reserved for persons with disabilities after she later claimed visual impairment based on a …

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.versusLORD NORTHBOOK AND ORS.

2019 INSC 969Matter referred to larger bench

The testator, Raja Sardar Singh, died in 1987 without apparent legal heirs and had executed a will bequeathing his assets to the Khetri Trust. The Trust sought probate, which was dismissed by the Delhi High Court, while agnates also objected. The Rajasthan Collector, after an inquiry, initiated …

KHUMAN SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2019 INSC 965Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Khuman Singh, entered the deceased Veer Singh's field with his buffaloes, leading to a dispute over grazing rights. In a sudden quarrel, Singh struck Veer Singh on the head with an axe, causing six injuries that resulted in death. The trial court convicted Singh under Section 302 IPC …

PRAHLAD RAUTversusALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

2019 INSC 964Dismissed

The appellant, a former steward of AIIMS, was suspended in 1991 following a FIR for alleged embezzlement and later convicted in 1993 for theft, leading to his removal from service by a memorandum dated 6 January 2000 under Rule 19(i) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965. After a settlement that resulted in …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERSversusMAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEEDS CO. PVT. LTD.

2019 INSC 945Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the High Court order that de‑sealed the godowns of Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Ltd. The company processed cotton and non‑cotton seeds at its Dhanora unit and stored packed and labelled seeds in an attached godown without obtaining a licence for storage, …

G H M/S. SHREE DANESHWARI TRADERSversusSANJAY JAIN AND ANOTHER

2019 INSC 932Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Shree Daneshwari Traders (appellant) supplied rice bags to Sanjay Jain (respondent) on a mixed cash‑and‑credit basis. The respondent issued several cheques to settle credit purchases, but the cheques were later presented and dishonoured for insufficient funds. The appellant filed two complaints …

RAMESHWAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2019 INSC 931Dismissed

The case concerns the murder of Ram Autar on 8 January 1984, for which appellants Rameshwar and Balaram were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that Rameshwar, armed with an axe, and Balaram, armed with a rifle, acted in concert to kill …

MALLIKARJUN AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2019 INSC 880Disposed off

The case involved the murder of Bhimraya, alleged to have been committed by accused Mallikarjun, Ravi, Balappa and an absconding co‑accused. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the victim's mother (PW‑5) and his brother (PW‑7) as eye‑witnesses, medical evidence of the injuries, and the …

ZONAL MANAGER, BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, KOCHI & ORS.versusAARYA K. BABU & ANR.

2019 INSC 882Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned recruitment of Agricultural Field Officers by the Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS) for Bank of India. The notification dated 17‑11‑2014 required a B.Sc. in Agro‑Forestry, but the two private respondents held B.Sc. in Forestry and were provisionally selected before …

CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION ANDversusHARI RAM

2019 INSC 866Appeal(s) allowed

The Chandigarh Administration allotted a commercial booth to Hari Ram in 1996 for a premium of Rs.70,500, but he failed to pay the subsequent installments and ground rent despite numerous opportunities. The lease was cancelled in 2006 and an eviction order was issued under the Public Premises …

VIJENDRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2019 INSC 845Appeal(s) allowed

Vijendra was charged under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated buffalo milk. A food inspector took a milk sample in the presence of a public witness, sent it to the public analyst, and the analyst’s report indicated adulteration. The report was dispatched to …

SURYAKANT BABURAO @ RAMRAO PHADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 832Case Partly allowed

The case arose from a quarrel in which accused No.1 (Devraj) fired a pistol at PW‑6, inflicting a chest wound capable of causing death, and also shot PW‑7 in the knee, while accused Nos.2 and 3 assaulted the victims with sticks and fists. The trial court convicted all three under Section 307 IPC …

BHARATBHAI BHIMABHAI BHARWADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 839Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, Bharatbhai Bhimabhai Bharwad, filed a criminal complaint alleging that respondents No.2 and No.3 attacked him and his brother with swords, causing serious injuries. The trial court granted bail to the accused with conditions, after noting the prima facie case and the accused's lack …

RIVER PELLETS LIMITEDversusKAMACHI INDUSTRIES LIMITED

2019 INSC 817Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant and respondent entered into a contract for the sale of iron ore pellets that contained an arbitration clause stating that arbitration would be governed by the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and that the venue of arbitration would be Bhubaneswar. A dispute arose and the …

SHIV PRAKASH MISHRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

2019 INSC 798Dismissed

The complainant Shiv Prakash Mishra alleged that five persons, including Subhash Chandra Shukla (respondent No.2), formed an unlawful assembly and attacked his brothers, resulting in the death of Sangam Lal Mishra. While the FIR named all five, the investigating officer, after examining witnesses, …

SRI A.M.C.S. SWAMY ADE/DPE/HYD (CENTRAL)versusMEHDI AGAH KARBALAI & ANR.

2019 INSC 795Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an officer of the Southern Power Distribution of Telangana Limited, filed a criminal appeal against the High Court’s order that quashed proceedings for electricity theft under the Electricity Act, 2003. The respondent had allegedly tampered with an electricity meter, leading to a loss …

SOPAN (DEAD) THROUGH HIS L.R.versusSYED NABI

2019 INSC 761Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Syed Nabi, borrowed Rs 5,000 from the defendant and later an additional Rs 2,224, treating the sums as consideration for a sale of his land. A registered sale deed dated 10‑12‑1968 conveyed the land to the defendant, and a contemporaneous agreement promised reconveyance upon …

M/S HANDE WAVARE & CO.versusRAMCHANDRA VITTHAL DONGRE & ORS.

2019 INSC 746Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the allotment of a large gala (shop No.F‑158) in the Vashi wholesale market under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. The High Court had held that only respondent No.2 (Habibullah Farhatullah) was entitled to the gala …

BENGAL CHEMICALS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED ANDversusAJIT NAIN AND ANOTHER

2019 INSC 740Disposed off

The lease of a premises owned by Bengal Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. expired on 31 May 2014. The landlord proposed new lease terms, which the tenant (Ajit Nain) did not accept, yet continued to occupy the premises without paying rent, depositing only Rs.25,00,000 as directed by the High Court. …

CHRISTOPHER RAJversusK VIJAYAKUMAR

2019 INSC 726Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant borrowed Rs 30,000 from the respondent and issued a post‑dated cheque dated 04‑09‑2003, which was presented after three years and returned for insufficient funds. The respondent filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act; the trial court acquitted the …

THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER TWAD BOARD & ANOTHERversusM. NATESAN ETC.

2019 INSC 672Disposed off

The respondents were engaged as temporary store watchmen on daily wages between 1986 and 1989 under a purely temporary engagement order that stipulated termination when the requirement ceased. After the stores were closed in 1990, the respondents were terminated and later obtained an award from the …

BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITEDversusADVENTZ INVESTMENTS AND HOLDINGS LIMITED & OTHERS

2019 INSC 663Disposed off

Birla Corporation filed a criminal complaint alleging that respondents had stolen or misappropriated 54 confidential company documents and sought prosecution under IPC sections 379, 403, 411 read with 120B. The trial magistrate, relying on vague statements of the company representative and an …

BHIVCHANDRA SHANKAR MOREversusBALU GANGARAM MORE & ORS.

2019 INSC 643Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Bhivchandra Shankar More, challenged an ex‑parte decree passed in a partition suit. After an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to set aside the decree was dismissed, the appellant filed an appeal under Section 96(2) CPC, withdrew it, and later filed a fresh appeal with a …

ASHOKSINH JAYENDRASINHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2019 INSC 634Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ashoksinh Jayendrasinh, was convicted under Sections 302 and 307 IPC read with Section 34, and Section 25(c) of the Arms Act for allegedly firing shots that killed Somiben and injured two others during a dispute over a road. The incident occurred at 9:00 PM in a dark agricultural …

SASIKALA PUSHPA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2019 INSC 636Disposed off

The appellants, including a former Rajya Sabha MP, filed anticipatory bail applications in a sexual harassment case and submitted a vakalatnama that purportedly bore their signatures dated 17 August 2016 in Madurai, although they were abroad at that time. The Madurai High Court held the vakalatnama …

RAMBIRversusSTATE OF NCT, DELHI

2019 INSC 626Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Rambir, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for strangling his wife with a saria on a rooftop after a quarrel over money. The trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment, a decision upheld by the Delhi High Court, which rejected his claim that the killing fell under …

RAJA SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.

2019 INSC 624Appeal(s) allowed

Four officers were appointed as District Minority Welfare Officers in 1997 after a selection process, on a temporary basis of two years, but continued in the post beyond that period. The Uttar Pradesh Minority Welfare Department Gazetted Officers Service Rules 2001 later prescribed that such posts …

TEJASWINI GAUD AND ORS.versusSHEKHAR JAGDISH PRASAD TEWARI AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 630Disposed off

The father filed a writ of habeas corpus seeking custody of his 1½‑year‑old daughter who had been looked after by the child's maternal aunt and uncle after the mother’s death and the father's prolonged illness. The High Court ordered the child be handed over to the father, granting the writ. The …

STATE OF GUJARATversusKALUSINH @ HARPALSINH

2019 INSC 1415Dismissed

On 23 November 1997, while ploughing a disputed piece of land, accused No.1 (Ashok Singh) and accused No.2 (Kalusinh) allegedly fired three shots, killing Somiben (wife of PW‑5) and injuring PW‑6 and PW‑7. The trial court convicted both accused under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and …

PRAVEEN SINGH RAMAKANT BHADAURIYAversusNEELAM PRAVEEN SINGH BHADAURIYA

2019 INSC 615Disposed off

The appellant and respondent were married in 1998 and later lived separately, leading the husband to file a suit for dissolution of marriage which was dismissed by the trial, district and high courts. While the appeal was pending before the Supreme Court, the parties reached an amicable settlement …

THONGAM TARUN SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR

2019 INSC 599Case Partly allowed

The appellants, a police driver and a singer, were convicted of gang rape of a 16‑year‑old girl and of criminal conspiracy under Sections 376(2)(g) and 120‑B IPC, receiving fifteen years and ten years rigorous imprisonment respectively, to run concurrently. They challenged the conviction on the …

GOVIND SINGHversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2019 INSC 587Appeal(s) allowed

The father, Govind Singh, threw a burning chimney lamp at his daughter Lalita during a heated argument over a light bulb, causing severe burns that led to her death after seven days. The prosecution relied primarily on the daughter's dying declaration, as the eyewitnesses turned hostile, and secured …

HARI STEEL AND GENERAL INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR.versusDALJIT SINGH & ORS.

2019 INSC 569Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had entered into an agreement to sell a Delhi property and associated business for Rs 55.50 crore, receiving Rs 5 crore as part consideration, and sued for specific performance. The defendants contested the agreement, claiming the document was forged, the …

CANTONMENT BOARD, MEERUT & ANR.versusAFZAL

2019 INSC 558Dismissed

The Cantonment Board, Meerut issued show‑cause notices under Section 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 to respondents including Afzal, alleging unauthorised construction within the cantonment. The respondents objected, but the primary authority neither referred to the objections nor mentioned the …

GLOBE GROUND INDIA EMPLOYEES UNIONversusLUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES & ANR.

2019 INSC 559Appeal(s) allowed

The Globe Ground India Employees Union raised an industrial dispute alleging that Globe Ground India Pvt Ltd, a subsidiary of Lufthansa German Airlines, closed its establishment and retrenched 106 workers. The union sought to implead Lufthansa, claiming it was the holding company and therefore a …

JAGDISH PRASAD PATEL (DEAD) THR. LRS.& ANOTHERversusSHIVNATH & OTHERS

2019 INSC 493Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents-plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration of title and possession of several khasra lands, alleging that their fathers were lessees under a patta-lease. The appellants-defendants contended that the land had been auctioned in 1929 to their grandfather Gaya Din, who obtained a valid …

NUTAN GAUTAMversusPRAKASH GAUTAM

2019 INSC 467Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court heard appeals by Nutan Gautam (wife) against orders of the Allahabad High Court that directed her son, a ten‑year‑old boy, to be admitted to a boarding school in New Delhi and to return to his mother during summer vacations. The boy, who had been studying since first grade at …

NANDLALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2019 INSC 385Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Nandlal Baviskar, was convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) for causing the death of his cousin's brother during a dispute over a common wall. The incident involved an exchange of abuse, a stick blow on the appellant, his retreat to his house, and a return armed with a gupti, which he …

MRS. NEERAJ DUTTAversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)

2019 INSC 291Matter referred to larger bench

Mrs. Neeraj Dutta, an LDC of Delhi Vidyut Board, allegedly demanded a bribe from Ravijit Singh Sethi for installation of an electricity meter. The complainant paid Rs 10,000, which was later recovered from the accused and the money tested positive by phenolphthalein test. The complainant died before …

JAGDISH CHANDERversusSATISH CHANDER AND ORS.

2019 INSC 283Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Satish Chander, claimed that his mother Vidya Devi had been fraudulently induced to execute a gift deed in favour of Jagdish Chander, alleging that the deed was supported by a consideration of Rs 5,000 and therefore invalid under Section 122 of the Transfer of Property Act. The trial …

SUNIL KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 284Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Shilpa alleged that her sister‑in‑law Chanchal/Babita set her on fire and, in a dying declaration, named only her sister‑in‑law. The FIR initially listed nine persons, including the appellants, for offences under Sections 302 IPC, 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, but the …

SHRI RAM MANDIR INDOREversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 279Dismissed

The appellant, Ram Das (later Bajrang Das), claimed that Shri Ram Mandir in Indoukh is a private temple over which he is the Mahant and sought a declaration and injunction against State interference. The State contended that the temple is public, its lands are inam property vested in the deity, and …

BALVIR SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2019 INSC 226Disposed off

The incident occurred on 11 March 1998 when the victim, Mohan Mehtar, was stopped by four accused; Bharat Singh beat him with a lathi, Balvir Singh and Bhav Singh held him, and Harnam Singh shot him at close range, causing instant death. The trial court convicted all four under sections 341, 302 …

BIR SINGHversusMUKESH KUMAR

2019 INSC 149Appeal(s) allowed

Bir Singh (complainant) advanced a Rs 15 lakh loan to Mukesh Kumar (accused) and received a cheque which was dishonoured for insufficient funds on two occasions. After a statutory notice went unanswered, a criminal complaint under Sections 138 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was …

BALKRISHNA DATTATRAYA GALANDEversusBALKRISHNA RAMBHAROSE GUPTA AND ANOTHER

2019 INSC 153Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, claiming to be a tenant, filed a suit under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 seeking a permanent injunction against the landlord, asserting he was in actual possession of the premises. The landlord contended that a settlement in an earlier suit (RCS No.1004/1988) caused the …

ER. K. ARUMUGAMversusV. BALAKRISHNAN & ORS.

2019 INSC 154Appeal(s) allowed

The Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board (TWAD Board) occupied land in 1991 and was directed by the Madras High Court to ensure "fair and reasonable" compensation to the landowner. The District Collector fixed the land value at Rs 200 per sq ft (based on the 2012 guideline) and the Board paid …

STATE OF GUJARATversusAFROZ MOHAMMED HASANFATTA

2019 INSC 146Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Gujarat filed a criminal appeal challenging a Gujarat High Court order that set aside a magistrate’s cognizance and issuance of summons against Afroz Mohammed Hasanfatta in a complex economic offence involving alleged hawala transfers of foreign exchange to Dubai and Hong Kong. The …

ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCESversusSANJIV CHATURVEDI & ORS.

2019 INSC 127Dismissed

The appeal concerned an order of the Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) who, sitting alone, stayed proceedings before a two‑member bench and rendered its interim orders ineffective. The petitioner (All India Institute of Medical Sciences) argued that the Chairman had acted beyond …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSHANKAR GANAPATI RAHATOL & ORS.

2019 INSC 119Disposed off

In 1998 a complaint was lodged alleging that a group of accused assaulted the complainant, leading to charges under Sections 143, 147, 323 r/w 149, 325 IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. The trial court acquitted all accused, and the State of Maharashtra applied for leave to appeal under …

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANOTHERversusTHANA SINGH AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 30Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB) classified Sub Fire Officers in Group XII but paid them a lower scale than Head Clerks, Head Clerk‑cum‑Divisional Accountants and Internal Auditors, also in Group XII. The Sub Fire Officers claimed parity of pay on the ground of discrimination under Article …

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITEDversusRAJESH KUMAR JINDAL & OTHERS

2019 INSC 31Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab State Electricity Board revised the pay scales of Head Clerks (Rs.2000‑3500) and Internal Auditors (Rs.1800‑3200) in 1990, disturbing a long‑standing parity that had existed for over two decades. Internal Auditors filed writ petitions claiming that the revision violated Articles 14 and 16 …

JAMILA BEGUM (D) THR. LRS.versusSHAMI MOHD. (D) THR. LRS. & ANOTHER

2018 INSC 1206Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Shami Mohd., sued Jamila Begum for a declaration that a 1967 mortgage deed and a 1970 sale deed executed by his father, Wali Mohd., in favour of the defendant were void, alternatively seeking redemption of the mortgage. The trial court held the documents valid and dismissed the suit; …

HUKUM CHANDRA (D) THR. LRS.versusNEMI CHAND JAIN & ORS.

2018 INSC 1208Dismissed

The appellant, a tenant of a shop in Muraina, Madhya Pradesh, faced an eviction suit filed by the landlord under Section 12(1)(f) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961, claiming the premises were needed for his son Rajendra Kumar's utensil business. The trial court dismissed the …

THE CHAIRMAN V. O. CHIDAMBARANAR PORT TRUST & ORS.versusCAPT. PAUL NADAR BENNET SINGH

2018 INSC 1164Case Partly allowed

The Chairman V. O. Chidambaranar Port Trust appointed Capt. Paul Nadar Bennet Singh as a Pilot Officer in 2008 on a regular basis, subject to him qualifying in a pilot‑license examination. In 2012 the Trust terminated his service, alleging that his Certificate of Competency (CoC) as Master issued by …

SANJAY KUMAR JHAversusPRAKASH CHANDRA CHAUDHARY & ORS.

2018 INSC 1160Leave Granted & Allowed

The case concerned the allotment of a diesel/petrol retail outlet by Indian Oil Corporation, where Sanjay Kumar Jha was initially empanelled first and the outlet was awarded to him, but the second‑ranked applicant, Prakash Chandra Chaudhary, obtained a writ order directing the corporation to issue …

SP SINGLA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ANOTHER

2018 INSC 1149Disposed off

The appellant, a construction contractor, entered into a contract with the State of Himachal Pradesh that contained Clause 65, which stipulated that any dispute would be referred to a sole arbitrator appointed by the Engineer‑in‑Chief. When a dispute arose, the Chief Engineer appointed the …

STATE REP. BY THE DRUGS INSPECTORversusMANIMARAN

2018 INSC 1122Leave Granted & Allowed

The respondent, Manimaran, operated a medical shop without a valid drug licence and was charged under Sections 18(c), 27(b)(ii) and 28 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The trial court and the first appellate court convicted him, imposing a one‑year rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5,000, …

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusMANGA SINGH

2018 INSC 1120Leave granted

The State of Himachal Pradesh prosecuted Manga Singh for raping his nine‑year‑old cousin who was staying at her aunt's house. The child testified that the accused forced her to sleep with him and inserted his private part into hers, a claim she reported to school teachers who lodged an FIR. The …

PALANIversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2018 INSC 1105Dismissed

The appellant Palani was convicted for the murder of his nephew Sankar under Sections 148, 435 r/w 149 and 302 r/w 149 of the IPC. The prosecution's case rested on the testimony of the victim's mother (PW‑1), who identified the accused and described the assault, and was corroborated by medical …

KAMILversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2018 INSC 1027Dismissed

The appellant Kamil was convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. He contended that the charge under Section 302 was not formally framed, rendering the conviction invalid. The Supreme Court examined Section 464 of the CrPC, which states that a conviction is not void for …

STATE OF MIZORAMversusDR. C. SANGNGHINA

2018 INSC 1019Leave Granted & Allowed

The State of Mizoram filed a case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 alleging that Dr. C. Sangnghina had misappropriated public funds. The Special Court discharged him in 2013 because the prosecution sanction was issued by an authority not competent to grant it. The Governor later issued a …

STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)versusPANKAJ CHAUDHARY AND ORS.

2018 INSC 1017Disposed off

The State prosecuted Pankaj Chaudhary and three others for gang‑rape of a woman on 28 July 1997. The trial court convicted them under Section 376(2)(g) IPC based on the victim’s testimony, corroborated by her mother’s evidence, medical examination, and forensic DNA findings. The Delhi High Court set …

DALIP SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 995Leave Granted & Dismissed

The Haryana Urban Development Authority allotted an industrial plot to Rabinder Nath, MD of M/s Shiva Dairy & Oil Mills, in 1984 with a condition to complete construction within two years and commence production. The allottee and later his legal heirs failed to start construction or production for …

KAMALA AND OTHERSversusM.R. MOHAN KUMAR

2018 INSC 984Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Kamala and her two children, claimed maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, asserting that Kamala was the legally wedded wife of the respondent, M.R. Mohan Kumar. The respondent denied any marriage and argued that without a valid marriage, maintenance could not …

RAM AVATAR SONIversusMAHANTA LAXMIDHAR DAS AND ORS.

2018 INSC 988Leave Granted & Allowed

The appellant, Ram Avatar Soni, challenged the probate of a Will dated 12 March 1989 allegedly executed by Mahanta Natabar Das (MND) in favour of the first respondent, Mahanta Laxmidhar Das, alleging the Will was fraudulent and the signature forged. He filed an application under Order XXVI Rule 10A …

BHAGIRATHversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2018 INSC 975Appeal(s) allowed

On 19 August 2005, the deceased Bherulal was surrounded by the appellant Bhagirath, who was armed with a farsi, and several others. During a heated quarrel, Bhagirath struck the victim on the right side of the head near the ear, causing fatal injuries; an injured eye‑witness (PW‑6) corroborated this …

UPPALA BIXAM @ BIXMAIAHversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2018 INSC 953Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted for the murder of a shepherd, Ramesh, and for concealing the body under sections 302 and 201 of the IPC, based largely on an alleged confessional statement and the recovery of three sheep allegedly sold by the appellant. The prosecution could not positively identify the …

MOHD. SAHID AND OTHERSversusRAZIYA KHANAM (D) THR. LRS. AND ANOTHER

2018 INSC 949Leave Granted & Dismissed

The original civil suit filed in 1979 sought cancellation of alleged forged sale deeds and an injunction. After a series of proceedings, the suit was decreed ex parte on 10 May 2012. The appellants filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 349‑day delay, …

RAM LALversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2018 INSC 918Case Partly allowed

Ram Lal, a peon employed by United Commercial Bank, was assigned clerical duties of a cash clerk and allegedly misappropriated Rs.38,500 by pocketing deposits and forging entries to enable withdrawals. The prosecution relied heavily on two extra‑judicial confession statements made by the accused in …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusCHHAAKKI LAL AND ANOTHER

2018 INSC 889Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted Chhaakki Lal and his son Akhilesh for the murder of four persons, including a three‑year‑old child, based primarily on the testimony of the sole eye‑witness Kesar Bai (PW‑1). The trial court convicted them under Section 302 IPC and imposed death sentences, …

KANNANversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2018 INSC 809Dismissed

The case involved a grocery shop owner (PW‑2) who sought the return of a seized accounts book and was asked for a bribe by Assistant Commercial Tax Officer A‑1. After filing a complaint, a trap was arranged and PW‑2 paid Rs.800 to A‑2 on A‑1’s direction; the transaction was detected using a sodium …

C. R. KARIYAPPAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2018 INSC 786Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a school teacher, struck a second‑standard student with a wooden stick, causing loss of sight in the child's left eye. The trial court acquitted him, citing contradictions in eye‑witness testimony, alleged tutoring of the child witness, and a 25‑day delay in filing the FIR. The High …

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusRAJA ETC.

2018 INSC 771Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against the acquittal of three accused in a murder case where the victim, Shabu, was shot dead and his brother Riyazuddin injured. The trial court had convicted the accused under IPC s.302 read with s.34 based on the testimony of Imamuddin, a lawyer and brother of …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusPREETAM

2018 INSC 757Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed the acquittal of the accused in a rape case involving a 12‑year‑old girl. The trial court had convicted the accused under Section 376 IPC based on the victim's testimony, medical evidence of a torn hymen, and an eyewitness who saw the accused fleeing. The High …

KRISHAN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

2018 INSC 756Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Krishan Kumar challenging a High Court order that set aside his acquittal and remitted the case for a de novo trial on the ground that the prosecutrix had not been examined before the trial court. The appellant contended that the High Court decided the matter …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusP. RAVIKUMAR @ RAVI ETC.

2018 INSC 716Dismissed

The State of Karnataka appealed the acquittal of accused No.2 (P. Ravi Kumar) and accused No.3 (D.B. Savitha) in a murder case where the deceased, Mohan Kumar, was allegedly killed by a conspiracy involving accused No.1, accused No.2, and accused No.3, who were said to have an illicit relationship. …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusSRINIVASA

2018 INSC 703Dismissed

The State of Karnataka charged Srinivasa, the husband, with murder of his wife Rajashree, alleging he strangulated her and staged a hanging, motivated by an alleged illicit relationship with a second accused. The trial court convicted Srinivasa under Section 302 of the IPC, but the Karnataka High …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusA. B. MAHESHA ETC.

2018 INSC 702Dismissed

The State of Karnataka appealed the acquittal of A.B. Mahesha and others, who had been convicted by the trial court for murder based on circumstantial evidence that the deceased Jagdeesha was last seen with the accused, the recovery of his car, and the seizure of a gold chain, watch and ring from …

SIDDALINGversusTHE STATE, THROUGH KALAGI POLICE STATION

2018 INSC 684Dismissed

The appellant was married to Kavitha, who committed suicide within four months of their marriage, allegedly due to dowry harassment and the husband's illicit relationship with another woman. The prosecution presented documentary evidence of a Panchayat agreement in which the husband admitted …

BABJIversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2018 INSC 683Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Babji, was accused of demanding Rs.2,100 from a passenger (PW‑4) for a confirmed airline ticket, allegedly to induce an Indian Airlines employee to secure the ticket. The prosecution charged him under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, asserting that the money was a …

SELVIversusGOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS.

2018 INSC 513Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a suit for redemption of mortgaged lands where the plaintiffs sought partition of the mortgaged properties. The second defendant, Gopalakrishnan Nair, claimed ownership of an adjoining parcel identified as old Survey No. 988 and repeatedly objected that it should be excluded from …

SHAJAHANversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2018 INSC 158Case Partly allowed

The appellants were convicted under Section 396 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity with murder after a robbery at a pawn‑broking shop in 2002, during which one victim was strangled. The trial court sentenced them to ten years' rigorous imprisonment, but the High Court enhanced …

BHARATSING S/O GULABSINGH JAKHAD & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2017 INSC 1218Disposed off

The appellants sought re‑determination of compensation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filing an application on 31‑12‑1992 based on a 1992 award. While the award was under appeal, the Land Acquisition Collector prematurely decided the application on 25‑10‑2000. After the High …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSUNIL KUMAR & ANR.

2017 INSC 1143Heard

The appellant United India Insurance Co. Ltd. had earlier ordered that 50% of the compensation deposited in the Registry be released to the claimants upon identification. In the judgment dated 24 November 2017, paragraph II contained that direction. Upon clarification sought by the respondents, the …

THE STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS.versusJAYANTA CHAKRABORTY & ORS.

2017 INSC 1113Matter referred to larger bench

The State of Tripura and others appealed against Jayanta Chakraborty and others, seeking a re‑examination of the M. Nagaraj judgment on the test of backwardness for SC/ST reservations. The petitioners argued that the backwardness test should not apply to SC/ST in view of the Indra Sawhney and E.V. …

SIVANANDAN C.T. & ORS.versusHIGH COURT OF KERALA & ORS.

2017 INSC 1107Matter referred to larger bench

The petitioners challenged the selection of District and Sessions Judges for the Kerala Higher Judicial Service in 2015, alleging that the Administrative Committee introduced a minimum cut‑off mark for the viva‑voce after the written examination and interview had been completed, contrary to the Full …

BHARAT DEEP SETHIversusSONIA TAK.KAR

2017 INSC 1039Disposed off

The landlord filed an eviction suit and the tenant applied for leave to defend, claiming no landlord‑tenant relationship. The Rent Controller dismissed the application and the High Court, without hearing the merits, ordered the tenant to pay Rs.1.25 lakh per month as rent. The Supreme Court noted …

SANTHINIversusVJJAYA VENKETESH

2017 INSC 730Matter referred to larger bench

The petitioner sought transfer of a divorce and child‑custody petition from the Family Court in Alappuzha, Kerala to the Family Court in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. The respondent argued that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Krishna Veni Nagam, the matters could be dealt with via …

VIKRAM SINGH @ VICKY WALIA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

2017 INSC 594Dismissed

The petitioners Vikram Singh, Jasvir Singh and a third accused were convicted under Sections 302, 364A, 201 and 120B of the IPC and sentenced to death, with the death sentence of the female co‑accused later commuted to life imprisonment. They filed review petitions challenging the Supreme Court’s …

D. N. JOSHI (D) THR. LRS. & OTHERSversusD. C. HARRIS & ANOTHER

2017 INSC 578Dismissed

The appeal concerned a suit for eviction filed by D.C. Harris (respondent) against tenants D.N. Joshi and others (appellants) who challenged the respondents' title to the premises. The title derived from a 1949 gift deed by Akhtari Begum to her brother Zamir Ahmad, followed by a 1965 sale deed to …

POORAN CHANDRA JOSHI & ORS.versusBISWAN CHANDRA HARRIS (DEAD) BY L.RS.

2017 INSC 578Dismissed

The appeal arose out of a dispute concerning eviction under the Rent Control Act, where the appellants relied on a gift deed dated 31 May 1949 to assert a right over the premises. The central question was whether that deed conferred a valid title that could defeat the landlord’s right to evict. The …

KALYAN DEY CHOWDHURYversusRITA DEY CHOWDHURY NEE NANDY

2017 INSC 370Case Partly allowed

The husband Kalyan Dey Chowdhury and his wife Rita Dey Chowdhury (née Nandy) were married in 1995 and later divorced. The wife sought permanent alimony under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which was initially set at Rs.16,000 per month in 2015. The husband’s net salary rose from Rs.63,842 to …

DEEPA E.V.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 319Dismissed

The appellant, Deepa E.V., an OBC candidate, applied for the post of Laboratory Assistant Grade II in the Export Inspection Council of India, availing age relaxation and interviewing under the OBC category. She secured 82 marks but was not selected, and argued that she should be appointed under the …

AJAY KUMAR GHOSHAL ETC.versusSTATE OF BLHAR & ANR.

2017 INSC 90Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted for a dowry death and related offences under the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court, noting certain procedural lapses, set aside the conviction and ordered a de novo retrial under Section 386(b)(i) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Supreme Court …

DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARDversusPRAVEEN KUMAR

2016 INSC 1208Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) advertised a Teacher (Primary) post for Municipal Corporation of Delhi schools in 2009 with an age limit of 20-27 years. Praveen Kumar was declared ineligible as over‑age and challenged the decision, relying on a Delhi High Court judgment in …

BHUPINDER SINGH BAWAversusASHA DEVI

2016 INSC 1010Dismissed

The tenant Bhupinder Singh Bawa occupied a two‑room premises in New Delhi under a rent deed dated 20 July 1989. The landlord Asha Devi, who acquired the property in 2002, filed an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, claiming a bona‑fide requirement for her …

M/S. NORTHERN COALFIELD LTD.versusHEAVY ENGINEERING CORP. LTD. & ANR.

2016 INSC 518Appeal(s) allowed

Northern Coalfield Ltd., a government-owned corporation, entered into two contracts with Heavy Engineering Corp. Ltd. which contained an arbitration clause. Disputes were referred to the Government's "permanent machinery of arbitration" and awards were made, which Northern Coalfield challenged …

M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2016 INSC 417Disposed off

The Supreme Court was approached by a consortium of banks that had financed the Kundli‑Manesar‑Palwal Expressway project, seeking directions to ensure that the newly appointed concessionaire would assume the outstanding loan liabilities of the outgoing concessionaire. The Court noted that ordering …

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusCHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE & ORS.

2016 INSC 302Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained review petitions filed against its own 18 July 2013 judgment in the Christian Medical College case. The petitioners argued that the earlier decision ignored binding precedents and was pronounced without intra‑bench discussion. The Court, invoking the principle from …

M.C.MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 982Directions issued

The Supreme Court, hearing a series of petitions filed by environmental activist M.C. Mehta, examined the persistent high levels of air pollution in Delhi and the effectiveness of its earlier directions to divert non‑Delhi‑bound commercial traffic and levy an Environment Compensation Charge (ECC). …

NAR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2014 INSC 770Disposed off

Nar Singh was convicted under Section 302 IPC and Section 25(1B) of the Arms Act for the murder of Rajbir, based largely on circumstantial evidence and a forensic science laboratory (FSL) report (Ex‑P12) linking a recovered bullet to a country‑made pistol. The trial court and the High Court failed …