Created by Fuzzy Cloud

R F NARIMAN

278 judgments · newest first · showing 201–278

PURI CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2018 INSC 360

Puri Constructions entered into a 1984 agreement to construct an assembly building in Madhya Pradesh. A dispute led the Delhi High Court to appoint an arbitrator who rendered an award in 1989, which was later made a rule of court and executed in 1991. The appellant appealed the execution, and the …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.versusASHOKA INFRAWAYS LTD. & ANR.

2018 INSC 360Disposed off

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against an order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court that relied on an earlier judgment concerning the jurisdiction of arbitration tribunals under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983. The Supreme Court observed that the earlier High Court …

STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANR.versusM/S. KMC CONSTRUCTION LIMITED

2018 INSC 360Disposed off

The State of Chhattisgarh appealed against an order of the High Court that had directed the parties to approach the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for resolution of a dispute with M/S KMC Construction Limited. The Supreme Court examined whether the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran …

AVINASH C. & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2018 INSC 303Disposed off

The case arose from the Karnataka Public Service Commission's (KPSC) selection for Group ‘A’ and ‘D’ posts, where allegations of bribery and irregularities in examinations and interviews led to an FIR against KPSC officials. After a CID interim report, the Karnataka Government ordered the annulment …

SHAFHI MOHAMMADversusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2018 INSC 75Directions issued

The Supreme Court considered the use of videography at crime scenes as a tool to improve criminal investigations. Submissions highlighted international practice, the benefits of body‑worn cameras, and the need for safeguards under evidentiary law. The Court examined prior judgments on electronic …

M/S LION ENGINEERING CONSULTANTSversusSTATE OF M.P. & ORS.

[2018] 6 S.C.R. 683Disposed off

The dispute concerned the execution of a works contract which was referred to an arbitrator who awarded in favour of M/s Lion Engineering Consultants. The State of Madhya Pradesh challenged the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and sought to amend its objections …

THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.versusM/S BRAHMAPUTRA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED

[2018] 6 S.C.R. 962Dismissed

The State of Bihar challenged the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arguing that the Bihar Public Works Contracts Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008 excluded the Central Act for works contracts. The parties had a contract dated 22 June 2012 …

BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIAversusKOCHI CRICKET PVT. LTD. AND ETC.

2018 INSC 238Dismissed

The Board of Control for Cricket in India filed a Section 34 challenge to arbitral awards dated June 2015, and the award creditors sought execution. The award debtor argued that the pre‑amended Section 36 imposed an automatic stay on execution until the Section 34 petition was decided, while the …

INCOME TAX OFFICER, MUMBAIversusVENKATESH PREMISES COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.

2018 INSC 232Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether receipts such as non‑occupancy charges, transfer charges and common‑amenity‑fund contributions received by a premises cooperative society from its members are taxable as business income or exempt under the doctrine of mutuality. The Court held that the doctrine of …

ESSAR BULK TERMINAL LIMITED & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2018 INSC 187Dismissed

Essar Bulk Terminal Ltd. challenged a Gujarat Government notification expanding Hazira port limits under Section 5 of the Indian Ports Act, claiming it would affect land it had reclaimed for its captive jetty. The Supreme Court held that the notification was issued in public interest and was within …

JAYANT VERMA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 159Directions issued

The petition challenged the constitutional validity of Section 21A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, which bars courts from reopening bank loan transactions on the ground of excessive interest. The petitioners argued that the provision violated Article 14 and undermined State Debt Relief Acts …

KANDLA EXPORT CORPORATION & ANR.versusM/S OCI CORPORATION & ANR.

2018 INSC 113Dismissed

The appellants sought to enforce a foreign arbitral award in Gujarat High Court, which ordered enforcement. They then challenged the order by filing an appeal under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act, arguing that an appeal was permissible even though Section 50 of the Arbitration and …

CHHABILDASversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2018 INSC 106Disposed off

The appellant's land was reserved for a primary school under a development plan and a purchase notice was served under Section 49 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966. The State Government confirmed the notice and the appropriate authority filed an acquisition proposal within the …

BENGAL CHEMISTS & DRUGGISTS ASSN.versusKALYAN CHOWDHURY

2018 INSC 91Dismissed

Bengal Chemists & Druggists Assn. appealed against an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) that dismissed its appeal as not maintainable because it was filed nine days after the initial 45‑day limitation period and after the additional 45‑day grace period had also expired. …

AUTHORIZED OFFICER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE AND ANOTHERversusMATHEW K. C.

2018 INSC 71Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant bank sought to set aside an interim order of the Kerala High Court that stayed proceedings under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act after the borrower, Mathew K.C., filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking regularisation of his loan. The Supreme Court examined whether the writ …

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAversusM/S FAST WAY TRANSMISSION PVT. LTD.

2018 INSC 54Appeal(s) allowed

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) appealed against a penalty imposed on four Multi System Operators (MSOs) for terminating a cable‑TV broadcast agreement with a news channel, Day & Night News, alleging abuse of dominant position. The MSOs held about 85% of the cable‑TV subscriber base in …

M/S. INDIAN FARMERS FERTILIZER CO-OPERATIVE LIMITEDversusM/S BHADRA PRODUCTS

2018 INSC 53Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co‑operative Ltd., issued a tender for defoamers which was won by the respondent, Bhadra Products. After the respondent supplied the goods, a payment dispute arose and the parties went to arbitration. The sole arbitrator first decided the issue of limitation, …

NATIONAL TRAVEL SERVICESversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI, VIII

2018 INSC 35Matter referred to larger bench

National Travel Services, a partnership firm, obtained a loan from Jetair Private Ltd and subscribed to its equity in the names of two partners, who were registered shareholders holding 48.19% of the shares but held them for the benefit of the firm. The firm challenged whether Section 2(22)(e) of …

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusPFIZER LIMITED AND ORS.

2017 INSC 1248Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Central Government must obtain prior advice from the Drugs Technical Advisory Board (DTAB) before invoking the power under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 to prohibit, restrict or regulate a drug or cosmetic in public interest. The Court held …

MACQUARIE BANK LIMITEDversusSHILPI CABLE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

2017 INSC 1241Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined two pivotal questions arising under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: (i) whether the requirement in Section 9(3)(c) to attach a certificate from the financial institution confirming non‑payment of an operational debt is a mandatory condition precedent, and (ii) …

M/S SAM BUILT WELL PVT. LTD.versusDEEPAK BUILDERS & ORS.

2017 INSC 1232Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned a notice inviting tenders (NIT) for constructing an educational campus, which required bidders to have completed similar large‑scale projects. Respondent No. I was found ineligible by three expert committees, a finding upheld by the Single Judge of the High Court. The Division …

FEDERATION OF HOTEL AND RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONS OF INDIAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 1217Appeal(s) allowed

The Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Associations of India challenged the applicability of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976, its 1985 Enforcement Act and the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 to the sale of packaged water bottles served in hotels and restaurants at prices above the printed …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, KOLHAPURversusMIS. CHAPHALKAR BROTHERS PUNE

2017 INSC 1198Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra introduced a subsidy scheme for multiplex theatre complexes by amending the Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923, granting a three‑year exemption from entertainment duty followed by a two‑year partial remission. The Commissioner of Income Tax assessed the subsidy received by …

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 26(1) NEW DELHIversusS.R.M.B. DAIRY FARMING (P) LTD.

2017 INSC 1135Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether Income Tax Circular No. 3 of 2011, which bars filing of High Court appeals where the tax impact is below Rs 10 lakh, applies retrospectively to appeals already pending before the circular came into force. The Court noted divergent views among High Courts and …

NIKESH TARACHAND SHAHversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2017 INSC 1137Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, which imposes two additional conditions for granting bail when the offence involves a scheduled offence punishable with imprisonment of more than three years under Part A of the …

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITEDversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR.

2017 INSC 1109Disposed off

Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) imports crude oil into Bihar, refines it and sells petroleum products to two oil marketing companies (BPCL and HPCL) and to local retailers. IOCL pays Entry Tax when the products enter the Patna local area but claims that Value Added Tax (VAT) should be set off …

UNION OF JNDIA & ORS.versusBENGAL SHRACHI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LIMITED &ANR.

2017 INSC 1084Disposed off

The Union of India (lessee) and Bengal Shrchi Housing Development Limited (lessor) entered into a three‑year lease for commercial premises. Dispute arose over who should pay service tax on the lease. The High Court held the lessee liable, but the Division Bench reversed, holding the lessor liable …

M/S. K. LAKSHMANYA AND COMPANYversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

2017 INSC 1071Appeal(s) allowed

Mis. K. Lakshmanya & Co., a partnership, paid interest under Sections 234(A)-(C) for assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95 and applied to the Settlement Commission to have that interest waived. The Commission, relying on a CBDT circular, partially waived the interest, after which the Assessing …

KAMAL KANT JAINversusSURINDER SINGH (D) THR. LRS.

2017 INSC 1057Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Kamal Kant Jain, entered into an agreement to purchase a property from the respondent, Surinder Singh, based on an authorisation letter that allowed a power of attorney holder to sell the land. The agreement required payment of earnest money, and both the authorisation letter and the …

VISHNU BHAGWAN AGRAWAL & ANR.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2017 INSC 1054Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Vishnu Bhagwan Agrawal, insured jute stock with National Insurance Co. and later purchased additional jute, seeking an increase in the sum insured. The insurer did not formally acknowledge the increase, leading to a dispute over whether the policy was effectively amended and whether …

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-I, NEW DELHIversusMIS. E-FUNDS IT SOLUTION INC.

2017 INSC 1048Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether two US‑incorporated companies, eFunds Corp. and eFunds IT Solutions Inc., had a permanent establishment (PE) in India under the India‑US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The Revenue argued that a fixed place of business, a service PE, and an agency PE …

NABHA POWER LIMITED (NPL)versusPUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED (PSPCL) & ANR.

2017 INSC 1008Case Partly allowed

Nabha Power Ltd (NPL) entered into a 25‑year Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd (PSPCL) for a 1200 MW plant under a fuel‑specific, pre‑identified site procurement route. The PPA’s energy‑charge formula required the cost of purchasing, transporting and unloading …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusBALBIR SINGH MAINI

2017 INSC 1002Dismissed

The respondents, members of a cooperative housing society, entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) with developers to develop 21.2 acres of land. Only two instalments were paid and 7.7 acres were conveyed, for which capital gains tax was paid. The Assessing Officer and the ITAT treated the …

DUSHYANT N. DALAL AND ANOTHERversusSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

2017 INSC 1004Disposed off

The petitioners, Dushyant N. Dalal and his wife, were ordered by SEBI to disgorge unlawful gains of Rs.4.05 crore and pay a penalty of Rs.6 crore, with a debarment of seven years if unpaid. They challenged the SEBI order, arguing that interest could not be levied retrospectively under Section 28A of …

MOBILOX INNOVATIONS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusKIRUSA SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED

2017 INSC 975Appeal(s) allowed

Mobilox Innovations Pvt Ltd, an operational creditor, filed an application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) seeking initiation of corporate insolvency against Kirusa Software Pvt Ltd for an unpaid operational debt of Rs.20,08,202.55. The corporate debtor raised a dispute, …

M. D. FROZEN FOODS EXPORTS PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusHERO FINCORP LTD.

2017 INSC 976Dismissed

The appellants borrowed money from the respondent, securing the loan with seven immovable properties. Their loan account was declared a non‑performing asset and the parties’ contract contained an arbitration clause, leading the respondent to initiate arbitration while also issuing notices under …

M/S SHANTI FRAGRANCESversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 971Hearing Adjourned

The appeal concerned the taxability of pan masala containing tobacco (gutka) under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975, the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 and the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The central issue was whether the specific entry introducing "Pan Masala and Gutka" in the rate schedule …

CHRISOMAR CORPORATIONversusMJR STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

2017 INSC 905Appeal(s) allowed

Chrisomar Corporation supplied bunkers to the vessel M.V. Nikolaos‑S owned by Third Element Enterprises and sued for unpaid invoices, leading to the vessel's arrest. The parties entered a settlement on 18 January 2000, but the vessel was re‑arrested on 2 May 2000 when payment was still outstanding. …

SAMAR KUMAR ROY (D) THROUGH LR (MOTHER)versusJHARNA BERA

2017 INSC 860Disposed off

Samar Kumar Roy filed a suit under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (and Section 38 for injunction) seeking a declaration that his alleged marriage under the Special Marriage Act was void. The plaintiff died during the proceedings and his mother was substituted as his legal representative …

PARMANAND SINGH (D) THR. LRS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2017 INSC 833Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a descendant of former zamindars, claimed possession of about five acres of land since 1930. The State Government, on behalf of the Union of India, filed a suit under Section 180 of the United Provinces Tenancy Act, 1939, for recovery of possession and damages, which was later …

M/S. INNOVENTIVE INDUSTRLES LTD.versusICICI BANK & ANR.

2017 INSC 837Dismissed

Innoventive Industries Ltd., a corporate debtor, defaulted on its financial obligations and a financial creditor (ICICI Bank) filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The debtor argued that a notification under the Maharashtra Relief Undertakings …

SEJAL GLASS LTD.versusNAVILAN MERCHANTS PVT. LTD.

2017 INSC 783Disposed off

Sejal Glass Ltd. filed a civil suit seeking a money decree and recovery of TDS from Navilan Merchants Pvt. Ltd. and its directors. The defendants moved an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, claiming the plaint disclosed no cause of action against the directors and seeking bifurcation of …

TERAPALLI DYVASAHATA KUMARversusS.M. KANTHA RAJU (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ANR.

2017 INSC 748Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Terapalli Dyvasahata Kumar, filed a petition under Section 23 of the Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001, seeking declarations and injunctions concerning the management of a society. The District Court allowed the petition, holding that "District Court concerned" should be …

AZIZIA BEE @ SHAIK MUJEEB (D) THR. LRS.versusGOVT. OF A.P. & ORS.

2017 INSC 749Disposed off

The petitioners claimed ownership of land in Survey No. 129/45/D, Hyderabad, based on a 1961 compromise decree and a 1962 sale deed in favour of their mother. The State Government had recommended issuance of supplementary sethwars for this parcel. The land had been caught up in urban land ceiling …

B. VIJAYA BHARATHIversusP. SAVITRI & ORS.

2017 INSC 734Dismissed

The plaintiff entered into an agreement to sell a property with the first defendant, paying two‑thirds of the price in advance and agreeing that the defendant would execute a General Power of Attorney for the plaintiff's husband. On 13 March 1992 the defendant repudiated this by refusing to register …

HYUNDAI CORPORATION & ANR.versusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORAUON LTD.

2017 INSC 702Appeal(s) allowed

Hyundai Corporation entered into a contract with Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) for offshore oil exploration, which contained Clause 13.2.8 (sub‑contractor liability) and Clause 17.3 (indemnity for costs arising from a change of law). A change in Indian tax law – Section 44BB/4488 of the …

GLAXO SMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2017 INSC 635Appeal(s) allowed

GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd., a manufacturer of the bulk drug Betamethasone Disodium Phosphate, was granted an exemption under paragraph 28 of the Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 1987, valid up to 31‑December‑1994. After the exemption expired, the Union of India issued a show‑cause notice …

MANMOHAN ATTAVARversusNEELAM MANMOHAN ATTAVAR

2017 INSC 618Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Manmohan Attavar, contested an ex‑parte interim order of the Karnataka High Court that allowed the respondent, Neelam Manmohan Attavar, to occupy his Bengaluru premises under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The respondent claimed to be the appellant’s …

LAUREL ENERGETICS PVT. LTD.versusSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

2017 INSC 616Dismissed

Laurel Energetics Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) acquired 18% of Rattan India Infrastructure Ltd., the target company, in July 2014 at Rs 6.30 per share. In October 2015 it made an open offer to acquire the remaining shares at Rs 3.20 per share. SEBI held that the acquisition was not exempt under Regulation …

LALDHARI MISTRI (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ANR.versusVIJAY KUMAR

2017 INSC 611Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute involved a residential house in Munger, Bihar, owned by Hira Mistry, whose eviction decree against tenant Surendra Narayan Sinha was eventually reversed. An agreement to sell the house to Vijay Kumar was executed in 1983 while eviction proceedings were pending, leading to a …

ALKA CHANDEWARversusSHAMSHUL ISHRAR KHAN

2017 INSC 593Appeal(s) allowed

The sole arbitrator, on 7 October 2010, issued an interim order under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 prohibiting the disposal of any flats without its leave. The respondent transferred five flats on 14 October 2010, breaching that order, and the arbitrator later found the …

KUMARANversusSTATE OF KERALA & ANR.

2017 INSC 447Dismissed

The appellant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and was ordered to pay Rs.2.75 lakh as compensation under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with a default imprisonment of one month for non‑payment. He served both the principal sentence and the default …

HEERA LAL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2017 INSC 390Appeal(s) allowed

The wife, Lalita, committed suicide within five years of her marriage, alleging daily quarrels and dowry demands by her mother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law. A dying declaration recorded by a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate detailed the harassment and the in‑laws’ presence at the time of the act. The trial …

ANANT SINGH @ ANANT KUMAR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

2017 INSC 342Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a convicted history‑sheeter, was first detained under the Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981 on 5 September 2016. That order was revoked on 17 September 2016, and a second detention order was issued on 21 September 2016 on the same grounds that existed before the revocation. The …

HARI SHANKAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

2017 INSC 313Case Partly allowed

A land dispute in Mamkhor village led to a scuffle on 11 July 1992 during which accused Hari Shankar Shukla retrieved a country-made pistol and fired a bullet that killed Umesh Shukla and attempted to kill Savitri Devi. The trial court acquitted all three accused, finding the eyewitness accounts …

GANESH SHAMRAO ANDEKAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2017 INSC 250Directions issued

The appellants, Ganesh and Avinash Andekar, were convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the killing of their neighbour Raghunath, based on the testimony of the victim's daughter and wife who claimed to have witnessed the assault. The trial court had acquitted all …

HAKEEM KHAN & ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P.

2017 INSC 254Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a violent clash during a panchayat election in Sehore, Madhya Pradesh, where a group of accused, armed with lathis and fasris, attacked members of the complainant party, resulting in one death and several injuries. The trial court acquitted all seventeen accused, reasoning that …

CHHANGA @ MANOJversusSTATE OF M. P.

2017 INSC 186Dismissed

The appellant, Chhanga (Manoj), was part of a four‑person group that hurled two bombs at a shop where an informant was present, causing only minor injuries because the bombs exploded at a distance. The appellant shouted "kill him" and was charged under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian …

RAJAGOPALversusMUTHUPANDI @ THAVAKKALAI & ORS.

2017 INSC 190Appeal(s) allowed

Five accused attacked Rajagopal with deadly weapons, inflicting twelve serious injuries that led to the amputation of both his legs. Rajagopal, the injured eye‑witness, gave a detailed, uncontradicted testimony identifying each accused and describing the specific weapons used and injuries inflicted. …

PARASA KOTESWARARAOversusEEDE SREE HARI & ORS.

2017 INSC 187Dismissed

The case involved the murder of a woman whose decapitated body was recovered in a gunny sack from a canal. The Sessions Court convicted the two accused brothers on the basis of alleged motive, a "last seen" theory, recovery of the body, their absconding and false information given to the victim's …

P. EKNATHversusY. AMARANATHA REDDY @ BABU & ANR.

2017 INSC 1262Appeal(s) allowed

The case involves the double murder of a 12‑year‑old girl and her 50‑year‑old father, and attempted murders of two other family members, allegedly committed by Y. Amaranatha Reddy using a sickle. The trial court convicted the accused under Sections 302, 307 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, relying …

STATE BANK OF INDIAversusSANTOSH GUPTA AND ANR. ETC.

2016 INSC 1157Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI) could be applied in the State of Jammu & Kashmir. The High Court had held that key provisions of SARFAESI were ultra‑vires Parliament because they …

R.K. ROJAversusU.S. RAYUDU AND ANOTHER

2016 INSC 491

R.K. Roja was elected to the Nagiri Assembly Constituency and a respondent filed an election petition challenging her election. The appellant filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC to have the petition rejected, first as a counter‑affidavit and later as a formal application. The …

MUKUL SHARMAversusORION INDIA (P) LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

2016 INSC 400Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Mukul Sharma, entered into a sale deed with Orion India for a specified built‑up area of a building. A dispute arose over whether the term "built‑up area" included common areas such as lifts, corridors and lobbies. Initially the plaintiff understood it to include common areas, but …

SIDDHARTH CHATURVEDIversusSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

2016 INSC 260Matter referred to larger bench

The appellants were penalised by SEBI for alleged insider‑trading violations involving small share transactions. They contended that the penalty was excessive because the default was merely technical, with no disproportionate gain, loss, or repetitive nature, and argued that Section 15A (as amended …

M/S. SERVO-MED INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI.

2015 INSC 391Appeal(s) allowed

Servo‑Med Industries bought bulk disposable syringes and needles, sterilised them, packed them in branded pouches and sold them. The Central Excise Department issued a show‑cause notice demanding additional excise duty, contending that sterilisation transformed the articles into a new commodity. The …

AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX OFFICER &ANR.versusGOODRICKE GROUP LTD. &ANR.

2015 INSC 258Disposed off

The Agricultural Income Tax Officer appealed against a Calcutta High Court order that granted a refund of rural employment cess and education cess paid by tea estate owners, together with 12% interest, for periods before the West Bengal Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 1989. The Supreme Court …

V. SREERAMA CHANDRA AVADHANI (D) BY LRS.versusSHAIK ABDUL RAHIM AND ANR.

2014 INSC 555Appeal(s) allowed

Sheikh Hussein executed a gift deed on 26‑04‑1952 gifting an immovable property to his wife Banu Bibi. The deed contained conditions restricting alienation and stipulating that the property would revert to the donor or his heirs if Banu Bibi had no children. After Banu Bibi sold the property to V. …