Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
51 judgments · newest first · showing 1–51
The petitioners, Dipakbhai Patel and another, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents, including IAS officer Ms. Punya Salila Srivastava and others, had willfully disobeyed a Bombay High Court judgment dated 29 September 2025 in Writ Petition No. 11565 of 2025. The respondents had …
The petitioner, a former stock broker, challenged SEBI's demand for registration fees and the subsequent recovery of Rs.38.63 lakh by the Delhi Stock Exchange. He filed Appeal No. 298 of 2019 before the Securities Appellate Tribunal, which was disposed of together with five other appeals on the …
The petitioners, Security Agencies Welfare Organization and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Union of India. On 23 July 2026, the petition was listed for dismissal, and the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the advocate on record was …
The petition filed by Ruby Ojha, Pro‑Vice Chancellor of SNDT Women’s University, sought relief against disciplinary action initiated by the Vice Chancellor. The parties, after extensive hearing, reached a consensual arrangement. It was agreed that the Vice Chancellor is empowered under Sections 12 …
The petitioners filed a series of writ petitions and civil applications before the High Court of Bombay. On the hearing date, none of the petitioners appeared before the Court, and no counsel was present to represent them. The Court noted that the petitioners had also failed to appear on the …
Khushbu Impex, the original plaintiff, had deposited Rs.61,25,697.50 with the Bombay High Court to obtain a stay of the trial court decree. The appellants, Lyka Labs Ltd., sought the return of this amount, conditioned on the applicant furnishing a bank guarantee from a scheduled nationalised bank. …
The petitioner, Shri Satishkumar Gayaprasad Gupta, filed a writ petition seeking payment of all consequential service benefits, including back wages, gratuity, and leave encashment, after his superannuation on 30 June 2011. The respondent, MSEDCL, produced documents showing that certain benefits …
The petitioners failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple dates for a series of writ petitions and related civil applications. The respondents, represented by various advocates, were present and argued the case. The court noted that no petitioners were present on the previous date …
The petitioners failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple dates for a series of writ petitions and related civil applications. The respondents, represented by various advocates, were present and argued the case. The court noted that no petitioners were present on the previous date …
The petitioners filed a series of writ petitions and civil applications before the High Court of Bombay. On the hearing date, none of the petitioners appeared before the Court, and no counsel was present to represent them. The Court noted that the petitioners had also failed to appear on the …
The petitioners failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple dates for a series of writ petitions and related civil applications. The respondents, represented by various advocates, were present and argued the case. The court noted that no petitioners were present on the previous date …
The petitioners, Dhumane‑Patil Foundations and an associated institute, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra to issue a government resolution permitting the institute to commence a Diploma in Pharmacy course. The High Court had earlier ordered the State to …
The petitioners failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple dates for a series of writ petitions and related civil applications. The respondents, represented by various advocates, were present and argued the case. The court noted that no petitioners were present on the previous date …
The petitioners failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple dates for a series of writ petitions and related civil applications. The respondents, represented by various advocates, were present and argued the case. The court noted that no petitioners were present on the previous date …
The petitioners failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple dates for a series of writ petitions and related civil applications. The respondents, represented by various advocates, were present and argued the case. The court noted that no petitioners were present on the previous date …
The petitioner, Shubham Santosh Chavan, filed a writ petition seeking the cancellation of a Scrutiny Committee order dated 12 June 2026 that denied his claim to Thakar Schedule Tribe status and a declaration that he belongs to that category. The petitioner had earlier applied for verification of his …
The petitioner sought correction of his minor son’s date of birth in the School Leaving Certificate, alleging the entry (11 December 2008) was erroneous and should read 11 December 2010 as per the birth certificate and Aadhar. The Deputy Director of Education rejected the application on the ground …
The petitioner, Pritesh Bhalchandra Ghumare, filed a writ petition and later sought leave to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The bench consisting of Justices R.I. Chagla and Farhan P. Dubash considered the application. …
Surya Education Trust entered into consent terms with a private respondent (Respondent no.6) concerning salary claims and appointment to grant‑in‑aid posts. The Trust filed a writ petition seeking relief against the Education Authorities, while the consent terms stipulated that a prior order of the …
Pravin Vijay Desai filed Writ Petition No. 5296 of 2006 in the High Court of Bombay against S.B. Abhyankar and others. The petition sought relief, but during the proceedings the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. No further arguments or evidence were …
The Mahatma Gandhi Vidya Mandir filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of its appeals under Section 3(4) of the Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Management) Act, 1976 on the ground that they were filed beyond the prescribed 15‑day period. The State argued that the Act provides no power …
The applicants, legal heirs of the deceased Baburao Narayan Gaware, filed an interim application seeking to amend their 2004 writ petition to include the deceased's wife as a petitioner. The amendment was required to bring the legal heirs on record. The court noted a substantial delay in filing the …
The petitioner was appointed as a Group‑C Firefighter by the Panvel Municipal Corporation, conditional on producing a caste validity certificate within six months. The petitioner failed to submit the certificate, leading the corporation to issue a show‑cause notice for termination of service. The …
The petitioner, Jitendra Shankar, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the State of Maharashtra's Disability Welfare Department that required him to submit his Unique Disability ID (UDID) Card. The petitioner produced a UDID Card based on a disability certificate dated 14 March 2012, …
The petitioners, associations of management of various unaided colleges in Maharashtra, filed multiple writ petitions seeking direction for the State to pay pending scholarship, freeship and reimbursement fees to their institutions. The Court held that these writ petitions should be treated as …
The Karbhari Anna Charitable Foundation, operating a primary school, filed a writ petition seeking reimbursement from the State of Maharashtra. The State, through the Principal Secretary of Education, submitted that it had received recommendations from the Zilla Parishad, Pune, and forwarded the …
Petitioner Sharada Vijay Sapkale filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner later sought leave to withdraw the petition and obtain liberty to file a fresh petition due to subsequent events. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and another, opposed the withdrawal. The …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Sadashiv Gaikwad, a superannuated employee, filed a writ petition seeking immediate promotion to the post of Executive Engineer, claiming he had been exonerated in departmental proceedings. He argued urgency because his superannuation date was 31 March 2026. The …
The Association of Management of Ayurvedic Medical Colleges of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the applicability of the 2024 Regulations to its BAMS programme for the academic year 2026‑27. The petition sought interim permission to continue the course while the grievance was being …
The petitioner, a Sectional Engineer appointed in 2016, was terminated on 29 May 2025 by Respondent No. 2 without the inquiry mandated by Rule 8 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1979. The petitioner challenged the termination as a breach of natural justice. The High …
The petitioners, employees of Life Insurance Corporation of India, filed an interim application seeking permission to amend their writ petition for regularisation as directed by a Nagpur Bench judgment. The amendment sought to add new grounds and replace prayer clauses, with the respondents not …
The petitioner, a MBBS student, filed a writ petition seeking correction of her internal assessment marks in Anatomy, which were erroneously recorded as TH‑00 and PR‑00 instead of the correct TH‑44 and PR‑59, causing her to appear to have failed the subject. The college acknowledged the clerical …
Arjun Dhangar More, a Health Assistant, challenged his suspension order dated 13 February 2025 issued by the Zilla Parishad. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief against the suspension. The Zilla Parishad subsequently issued a revocation order on 27 February 2026, directing the …
The petitioner, Capt. Shri Y.D. Joshi, filed Writ Petition No. 5922 of 2006 in the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the Union of India and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered whether it could grant …
The petitioner, Shri Vikrant Vasant Ghavat, filed an interim application seeking restoration of his writ petition which had been rejected on 19 August 2025 by the Registrar for failure to remove office objections. The petitioner claimed genuine difficulty in complying with the deadline. The Court …
Dr. Asrar Samad Shaikh and others filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to Respondent No.3 to consider a joint representation dated 13 October 2025 within a stipulated period. The petition had earlier been marked for dismissal due to non‑appearance, but the petitioners …
The petitioner, Saloni Pradeep Patil, sought a writ directing the admission of her son to Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Pune. The college stipulated that admission would be granted only after the petitioner complied with specific procedural requirements, including registration at the admissions …
The High Court was asked to clarify an interim order dated 17 February 2026 that directed the State CET Cell to allow petitioners to apply for postgraduate medical seats under the 35% Institutional Quota, including unclaimed 15% NRI seats. Petitioners argued that, under Section 7(iii) and Section 14 …
The High Court was asked to clarify an interim order dated 17 February 2026 that directed the State CET Cell to allow petitioners to apply for postgraduate medical seats under the 35% Institutional Quota, including unclaimed 15% NRI seats. Petitioners argued that, under Section 7(iii) and Section 14 …
The High Court was asked to clarify an interim order dated 17 February 2026 that directed the State CET Cell to allow petitioners to apply for postgraduate medical seats under the 35% Institutional Quota, including unclaimed 15% NRI seats. Petitioners argued that, under Section 7(iii) and Section 14 …
The High Court was asked to clarify an interim order dated 17 February 2026 that directed the State CET Cell to allow petitioners to apply for postgraduate medical seats under the 35% Institutional Quota, including unclaimed 15% NRI seats. Petitioners argued that, under Section 7(iii) and Section 14 …
The High Court was asked to clarify an interim order dated 17 February 2026 that directed the State CET Cell to allow petitioners to apply for postgraduate medical seats under the 35% Institutional Quota, including unclaimed 15% NRI seats. Petitioners argued that, under Section 7(iii) and Section 14 …
The High Court was asked to clarify an interim order dated 17 February 2026 that directed the State CET Cell to allow petitioners to apply for postgraduate medical seats under the 35% Institutional Quota, including unclaimed 15% NRI seats. Petitioners argued that, under Section 7(iii) and Section 14 …
Akhil Kumar Jain, a student of the Children Welfare Centre’s College of Law, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the college to declare his Semester III results and to allow him to apply for revaluation beyond the stipulated 10‑day window. The petitioner alleged that the college had not …
Maharashtra Shaikshnik Arogya Vidyanagari filed Writ Petition No. 14864 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Commissioner, State Common Entrance Test Cell and others. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Suresh M. Kamble, later instructed the court to withdraw the petition …
The petitioner, Laxmi (Sunshine Builders), filed a writ petition challenging a DRAT order that directed it to deposit Rs. 125 crore as a pre‑deposit under Section 18(1) of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner argued it was not a borrower or mortgagor and therefore not liable to deposit. The respondents …
Dr. Raghunandan B. Nikam retired on 31 December 2017 at age 60 and petitioned the Bombay High Court for a direction to the State of Maharashtra and Thane Municipal Corporation to pay his pension of Rs. 23,375 and gratuity of Rs. 7,00,000 based on his basic pay. He relied on a Division Bench decision …
The petitioners, Vishnu Vaman Nimse & Ors., filed Writ Petition (St.) No.11420 of 2025 seeking payment of their old pension. The Registrar (Judicial‑I) raised office objections, gave two weeks for compliance, and upon non‑removal rejected the petition on 7 May 2025. The petitioners filed an interim …
The matter titled Tabrez Khan Wrongly Mentioned In Judgment was listed before the Bombay High Court. The parties are Tanrej Khan (appellant/petitioner) and Abhushama Hyatulla Chaudhary (respondent). The Court noted a paucity of time and consequently adjourned the hearing to 23 March 2026. No …
Ms Unnati Rawat, a first‑year LLB student at ILS Law College, Pune, sought a court order to condone her 45% attendance for the 2025‑26 academic year on humanitarian grounds, as she was the primary caretaker for her father undergoing prostate‑cancer surgery. The college, governed by the Pune …
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking correction of clerical errors in an order dated 17 January 2026. They specifically requested amendments to dates, monetary figures, and exhibit references contained in Paragraphs 1 and 2 of that order. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted a …
