Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
48 judgments · newest first · showing 1–48
The applicant, Shweta Kishore Dani, filed a criminal application seeking relief. Counsel for the applicant, Ms Srushti Dube, requested leave of the court to withdraw the application. The court, after considering the request, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the application was dismissed as …
The applicant, Ganesh Baban Gite, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging forgery and fraud in land subdivision to evade the statutory requirement of reserving 20% of large residential projects for EWS/LIG housing under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that fabricated …
The appellant, M/s Multi Modal Freight System Pvt Ltd, challenged the acquittal of Yogesh Mordani by the Metropolitan Magistrate in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant argued that, under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, …
Applicant Rhuturaj Mehta filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court. During the pendency of that application, he appeared before the trial court and was granted regular bail. The applicant's counsel argued that, in view of the regular bail, there was nothing left to be decided on …
Aparna Ramesh Nandoskar, a 68‑year‑old housewife, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The court, after hearing, was not inclined to grant the bail. Counsel for the applicant then sought leave to withdraw the application. The court …
The applicant, Mohammed Ali Memon, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.91/2026 alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the applicant participated in an unlawful assembly and assaulted an informant, while the defence contended that he was …
Grasim Industries Ltd appealed the acquittal of M/s Gobind Ram & Sons under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant argued that, under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it has a statutory right to challenge the acquittal and that the appeal …
Shailesh S. Desai appealed against M/s Amrit Trading Corporation and others in the Bombay High Court. The appellant sought relief, but the court received a communication from Bazar Peth Police Station indicating that respondent No.2, the proprietor of respondent No.1, had died on 19 November 2007, …
The appeal was filed by TPI India Limited challenging the acquittal of J. Diwakar and his firm Anil Enterprises by a Special Metropolitan Magistrate in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The State of Maharashtra, through its counsel, argued that the victim of a Section 138 …
Praful H. Jain appealed against the acquittal of four respondents in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant argued that, under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a victim has a statutory right to appeal an acquittal and that the appeal …
M/s. AB and U Communication Pvt. Ltd. appealed against the acquittal of M/s. Dhaval Enterprises under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as recorded by the Metropolitan Magistrate in 2008. The appeal, filed in 2009, remained pending for several years with no appearance by the …
Haresh Ramchandra Jadhav appealed against the acquittal of Waman Namdev Gaikwad by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ulhasnagar, in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. No parties appeared before the High Court, and the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State …
The appellant, a minor represented by his mother, appealed against the acquittal of the original accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appeal had been pending since 2009, but the appellant failed to appear, did not pay the required court fees, and showed no diligence …
The appellant, Vijay Balwant Todkar, appealed against the acquittal of respondents No.1 and No.2 by a Judicial Magistrate First Class in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. No parties appeared before the High Court, and the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State …
Ankush Gulabrao Bhapkar appealed the acquittal of Pandurang Sadhashiv Bhapkar, who had been found not guilty of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by the Metropolitan Magistrate. The appellant argued, relying on Supreme Court and High Court precedents, that under …
The appellant challenged the acquittal of the second respondent in a case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appeal, filed in 2008, remained pending for many years. Neither the appellant nor the second respondent appeared before the High Court, and the appellant’s counsel …
Jayantilal Gulecha appealed against the acquittal of Punamchand Mahajan by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Satana, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant argued that, pursuant to the proviso of Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, a victim is …
The appellant, Gorakh Babanrao Dhumal, sought permission to withdraw his criminal appeal (Criminal Appeal No.817 of 2006) before the Bombay High Court and to file a fresh appeal before the Sessions Court, relying on a recent Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial vs A Gnanasekaran. The …
The appellant, P. Raghothaman Nayakar, sought leave to withdraw three criminal appeals pending before the Bombay High Court and to re‑file them before the Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025). The Court considered whether such …
The appellant, P. Raghothaman Nayakar, sought leave to withdraw three criminal appeals pending before the Bombay High Court and to re‑file them before the Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025). The Court considered whether such …
The appellant, P. Raghothaman Nayakar, sought leave to withdraw three criminal appeals pending before the Bombay High Court and to re‑file them before the Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025). The Court considered whether such …
The appellant, Prashant Praveen Jain, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against Pacific Infotech Pvt Ltd, its directors, and the State of Maharashtra. The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal and instead file a fresh appeal before the Sessions Court, relying on the …
The appellant, a 70‑year‑old retired teacher, appealed the acquittal of four family members who were charged with offences under Sections 452, 341, 323, 504 and 506(2) IPC arising from a dispute over possession of a residential floor. The prosecution alleged that after a civil decree in the …
The appellant, Jognia Explosive, sought permission to withdraw its criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court and instead file a fresh appeal before the Sessions Court, relying on a recent Supreme Court decision. The Court considered the request and, noting the precedent, allowed the withdrawal …
Dilip Purushottam Thakkar filed two criminal revision applications (Nos. 399 and 400 of 2012) against respondents Nivruti B. Taware and others. No counsel appeared for the applicant in either proceeding. In application 399, counsel for respondent No.1, Alka Nivruti Taware, produced a death …
The appellant, Nooruddin Karimbhai Kathawala, filed a criminal appeal against Abdulla Karimbhai Kathawala and others. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died before the expiry of the three-year limitation period. The police station submitted a communication confirming the appellant's …
Mohammed Jamil Moosa Hakim filed a criminal revision application in the Bombay High Court. Before the matter could be heard, the applicant died, as confirmed by the State's counsel. No counsel appeared for the applicant, and the State submitted a communication confirming the death. The Court …
The applicant, Dattatraya Keshav Patil, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of a Judicial Magistrate that issued process against him under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly cheating a complainant of Rs.2,70,000. The magistrate, after a complaint and police investigation …
The applicant, a practicing lawyer, filed a criminal revision application but later informed the court that the dispute had been settled amicably and she no longer wished to pursue the matter. She sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a revision …
Harjeet Kaur filed a criminal revision application before the High Court of Bombay. She later appeared in person and sought leave to withdraw the revision, requesting liberty to pursue any other appropriate legal remedy. The Court considered whether it has the jurisdiction to permit withdrawal of a …
The applicant, Govind Madhav Upase, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to three months' rigorous imprisonment with a compensation order of ₹50,000. He appealed the conviction, but the appeal was dismissed, and the sentence upheld by the Additional …
The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal revision application (No. 653 of 2007) against Goutam Sunil Dutta. The applicant’s counsel informed the court that the dispute between the complainant and the accused had been amicably settled, and the proceedings had already been quashed by an order dated 8 …
The applicant, mother of the accused Swapnil Surve, sought discharge in a dowry‑related case where the deceased Shobhana Surti allegedly committed suicide after being denied entry into her matrimonial home due to a Rs.25 lakh dowry demand. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 304B, 498A, 306 and …
The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) filed a criminal revision against M/s Sawantwadi Lunch-Home for alleged non‑payment of statutory ESI contributions, seeking to overturn an acquittal granted by the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 85(a) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, …
The applicant, Dhanraj Motiram Bachhav, filed two criminal revision applications (Nos. 638/2008 and 639/2008) before the Bombay High Court. During the pendency, the applicant died on 1 December 2025 and a death certificate was produced. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted the death …
The applicant, Shahnawaz M. Khan, filed a criminal revision application and subsequently sought leave to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the applicant moved the court for permission to withdraw the revision. The court granted leave to withdraw, and the revision application was dismissed as …
The applicant, Dara Dadiba Gowadia, filed a criminal revision application (No. 295 of 2010) before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that the applicant had passed away, leaving no surviving interest in the proceedings. The court noted that the death of a party …
The revision challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge that had set aside a process issued by the Additional Metropolitan Magistrate in a complaint alleging non‑payment of commission. The complainant alleged that the accused had made false representations regarding payment, but the …
Kishanlal P. Ghachi filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, his counsel submitted a death certificate showing that the applicant had died on 26 September 2024. The court recorded the death certificate as evidence. Since the applicant was deceased, the …
The applicant, Chaudhary Abdul Majid Shahadat, filed a criminal complaint alleging cheating under Section 420 of the IPC against M/s Shree Metal Works and others for non-payment of goods supplied on credit. The respondents were charged, sought discharge, and the Additional Sessions Judge discharged …
The applicant was convicted under Section 39 read with Section 44(c) of the Indian Electricity Act for alleged tampering of an electricity meter at premises he was said to occupy. The prosecution’s case relied on a BEST employee’s inspection that found the meter seals broken and the meter running …
The applicant was charged for allegedly hitting a cyclist on 31 March 1999 and was convicted under Section 279 of the IPC and Section 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act for rash or negligent driving. The trial court found him guilty, and the appellate court upheld the conviction, prompting a revision …
Arun Meghraj Dagia filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Special Court (CBI), Mumbai, dated 22 March 2026. The applicant contended that the trial court had acquitted accused No.4 on 22 March 2016, rendering the revision unnecessary. The …
The applicant, Anil Ambadas Ughade, filed Criminal Revision Application No. 241 of 2008 challenging the disposal of Criminal Case No. 113 of 2007, which was pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khalapur. The learned counsel for the applicant argued that the revision should be …
The criminal revision application filed in 2004 remained pending for over two decades without being circulated or listed. When finally listed on 12 January 2026, neither the applicant nor any counsel appeared. The court noted the prolonged inactivity and the applicant's failure to prosecute the …
The applicants, Anil Kumar Kunjbihari Almal and another, filed a criminal revision seeking to quash the Sessions Court's order dated 8 June 2007 which granted them limited anticipatory bail. They also requested that the protective relief be continued until the final adjudication of the proceedings. …
The revision application filed by Arvind D. Desai and BS Pushkar challenged a Metropolitan Magistrate's order accepting a ‘C’ summary report and directing further investigation. The original complainant, Suhas S. Kinjavdekar, had earlier obtained a partial relief from the Additional Sessions Judge …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking the Court Receiver, appointed under Order 40 Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the CPC, to take action against respondents and demolish an illegal structure on the suit property. The High Court examined whether such a direction could be issued by a writ …
