Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
21 judgments · newest first · showing 1–21
The appellants Ramjor Singh and Ramesh Singh were convicted by a Special Judge for robbery under Section 392 IPC based on the testimony of the informant and three other witnesses. On appeal, the High Court examined the credibility of the witnesses, noting delays in filing the FIR, the absence of key …
Panna Lal, who stood as surety for accused Seetu (also known as Banti or Viresh) in a criminal case, was ordered to forfeit a bail bond of Rs 1 lakh after the accused absconded. The accused later surrendered and was placed in judicial custody, prompting the surety to seek a reduction of the …
The appellant, a juvenile aged 16 years, was charged under IPC sections 363, 364 and 506 for the alleged abduction and attempted murder of the informant's minor daughter, based largely on an alleged extra‑judicial confession; the victim was never recovered. The trial court denied bail, but the …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Saurabh, who is accused under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 325, 504 and 34 for a violent incident that resulted in death. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the fatal abdominal wound was caused by …
Ram Autar filed a criminal appeal (No. 699 of 1987) against the State in the Allahabad High Court. The appellant died, as confirmed by a letter dated 23.04.2026 from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahr. No application was filed by the legal heirs to continue the appeal. The Court noted the …
Chunna Singh appealed against the trial court's acquittal of respondents 2 and 3 in a criminal matter. The appeal was listed but the appellant died on 16 March 2026. No application was filed by the legal heirs to continue the appeal. The High Court noted the appellant's death and the absence of any …
Lakhan appealed against a conviction of the State in Criminal Appeal No. 2946 of 1988 before the Allahabad High Court. The appeal remained pending for many years. A letter dated 26 March 2026 from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hamirpur, informed the Court that the appellant, Lakhan, had died. No …
The appellants, Hirdesh and another, were accused under Sections 103(2), 352 and 115(2) BNS in a session trial and were ordered to forfeit personal bonds of Rs 1 lakh each after being absent when a witness was called on 04‑04‑2026. They sought an adjournment and later applied for recall of the …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Ajeet Singh, who is accused under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his uncle. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, citing lack of eyewitnesses and alleging that the recovered weapon was found three hours after the incident, …
Munni Devi appealed against an order dated 22‑07‑2025 that initiated forfeiture proceedings under Section 446 of the CrPC against her as surety for accused Liyaqat Ali. The accused had failed to appear, leading to non‑bailable warrants, but later surrendered on 13‑10‑2025 and was taken into custody. …
The applicant, Sunil, filed a third bail application in a case (Crime No. 309 of 2020) involving charges of murder, attempt to murder, and rioting under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 34 of the IPC and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the …
The appellant, husband of the respondent, filed an application under Section 340 CrPC/Section 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) alleging that the respondent gave a false affidavit regarding his employment with the Northern Central Railway. The Family Court rejected the application …
The appellant, Brajesh Singh, husband of the respondent, filed an application under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code (now Section 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) alleging that the respondent made false statements in an affidavit filed in a Section 125 CrPC case. The Family …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Gulzar, accused under Sections 302 and 394 of the IPC for a murder and robbery alleged to have occurred on 16 September 2017 in Noida. Gulzar contended that he was falsely implicated, that there were no eyewitnesses, no incriminating …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Jeetu Kumar, who is charged under Sections 498‑A, 323, 304‑B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for the alleged dowry‑related death of his wife. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserted that his …
The appellant Satyapal filed a criminal appeal (Defective No. 146 of 2010) before the Allahabad High Court. While the case was listed, the appellant died, as confirmed by a letter from the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 16-10-2025. No legal heirs filed any application to continue the appeal on his …
The applicant filed a second criminal bail application in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear before the court despite being listed. The counsel for the applicant also did not appear to argue the application. The court observed that the applicant seemed uninterested in pursuing the bail. …
The complainant filed a criminal complaint in 2011; the accused were acquitted by the trial court on 26‑06‑2023. The complainant erroneously appealed to the Session Court, which dismissed the appeal on 11‑07‑2024, directing that any appeal must be filed in the High Court under Section 378(4) of the …
The applicant, Sami Ali Khan, was charged under Sections 302, 120‑B and 34 of the IPC for the daylight murder of an eye surgeon, with the FIR assigning him the role of firing. He has been in custody since May 2021, amounting to about four and a half years, and filed a second bail application after …
Amar Nath Nishad was charged under several IPC sections, including murder and attempt to murder, for a 28 November 2021 incident in which two persons were killed and several injured. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the informant's party was the aggressor and that witnesses' statements …
The applicant, Naresh Singh, filed a bail cancellation application in the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant argued that the trial court had already scheduled the case for judgment, rendering the bail cancellation application unnecessary. The court considered whether the application was …
