Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
9 judgments · newest first · showing 1–9
The State of Uttar Pradesh filed an application seeking condonation of delay in filing a review petition against a 2014 judgment in Yasin v. State of U.P. The Special Leave Petition (Civil) against that judgment was dismissed on 26 November 2019, but the review petition was only filed on 25 March …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court under the priority case category, but failed to appear before the court. The State respondents were represented by standing counsel. Upon reviewing the record, the court found that no cause of action remained in favor of the …
The appellant, C/M Sardar Patel Smarak Inter College and others, filed a special appeal (No. 103 of 2016) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The appeal was scheduled to be heard before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Rajan Roy and Hon'ble Justice …
The appellant, C/M Sardar Patel Smarak Inter College and another, filed a special appeal before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The appeal was listed before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Rajan Roy and Hon'ble Justice Manjive Shukla. No counsel appeared on …
M/S Shree Radha Raman Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging an ex‑parte demand order dated 15‑12‑2023 issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh State Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 for the assessment year 2017‑18. The petitioner contended that the order was barred by the three‑year …
In Special Appeal No. 235 of 2014, the appellant Syed Mohammad Afsar Jah Rizvi challenged a decision of the U.P. State Bridge Corp. Ltd. The appeal was filed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant and no response was filed. Consequently, the …
Dr. Neeraj Chaubey filed a Special Appeal (No. 101 of 2007) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging a decision in Crl. Misc. Case No. 1880c/2002. The appellant appeared in person, but no response was filed on his behalf and no request for adjournment was made. The court observed …
The appellants, Amit Shukla and others, filed Special Appeal No. 401 of 2015 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging a decision of the State of U.P. through its Principal Secretary, Secondary Education, Lucknow. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants during the hearing. …
A public interest litigation (PIL) was filed by Smt. Maya Devi against the State of U.P. The court could not locate the case file for PIL No. 4101 of 2004, as it was missing from the records before the High Court moved to its new building in 2016. No representative appeared on behalf of the …
