Created by Fuzzy Cloud

RAJEEV MISRA

116 judgments · newest first · showing 1–116

STATE OF UPversusVIKRAM SINGH AND ANOTHER

The State of U.P. filed an appeal against Vikram Singh and another, but the appeal was lodged 189 days after the decree, exceeding the prescribed period. The State sought condonation of the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, submitting an affidavit and arguing that there was no deliberate …

MOHD. IQBAL ALIAS IQBAL BALAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohd. Iqbal sought a writ of mandamus directing the police not to register any further FIRs against him without first conducting a preliminary inquiry as mandated by Section 173(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The petitioner also asked for video‑conferenced statements …

MOHD. IQBAL ALIAS BALAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Mohd Iqbal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 challenging a sanction order dated 28‑11‑2024 issued by the Chairman of the U.P. Legislative Council under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The respondents raised preliminary objections, contending that …

DR MAN SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND 11 OTHERS

Dr. Man Singh Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking multiple mandamus orders directing cyber authorities and global platforms to investigate and curb alleged AI‑generated deepfakes and cyber offences under the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and related provisions. …

ROJ MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Hafij Ali filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08-09-2026 registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner was arrested in the very case. The petitioner, …

MEERA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Meera Devi filed a criminal appeal under Section 413 of the BNSS Act challenging the acquittal of two accused (Pushpa Devi and Arun alias Kallu) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Etawah, in a murder case arising from the death of her husband, Anil Kumar. The prosecution alleged that the accused …

AVKASH MAURYA AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Avkash Maurya and eight others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 29 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Bihar National Security Act (BNSS). The State, …

DINESH CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

Petitioner Dinesh Chandra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into Crime No. 130 of 2026. The petitioner alleged that the investigation had not been conducted properly and requested a time‑bound …

AMBIKA RUGHTA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Ambika Rughta and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑08‑2026 registered under several sections of the BNSS and the D.P. Act. An inadvertent error duplicated petitioner‑3’s name in the cause title, and the court allowed amendment of the …

NEETESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Neetesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 10‑08‑2026 registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3)B of the BNSS and Section 4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The State argued that the investigation was complete, a charge‑sheet had been filed on …

TEJPAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Tejpal and another filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 03.09.2026 that alleged offences under Sections 123, 308(5), 61(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. They claimed the FIR was malicious, filed to evade rent liability, and asserted their innocence. The State and …

ATISH CHANDRA GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Atish Chandra Gupta, the first informant in FIR No. 13.12.2024, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondents to conduct a fair investigation under IPC sections 318(4), 336(3) and 340(2). The State, through the learned Additional …

AMAN RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Aman Rai, an employee of RBL Finserve Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20-07-2026 registered under Section 316(5) B.N.S. (referred to as Section 409 IPC). He alleged that the FIR was belated, lacked specific details, and was based solely on …

SIDDHARTH SONKAR @ GULSHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Siddharth Sonkar and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 25‑03‑2026 registered under Section 351(3) of the BNS Act and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. They alleged that the FIR was fabricated because petitioner‑1 was in a …

AHMAD ALI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Ahmad Ali and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 13‑08‑2026 registered under sections 75, 333, 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. During the pendency of the petition, sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act were added, making the alleged victim a child. …

GUFRAN ALI AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Gufran Ali and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 01.06.2026 and the subsequent charge sheet filed under various IPC sections. The State, represented by the Advocate General, informed the Court that the investigation was complete and the …

SHASHI PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The appellant Shashi Pratap Singh challenged the acquittal of Arun Singh and his mother-in-law Usha Singh for alleged dowry harassment, dowry death and related offences arising from the death of his sister Asmita Singh, who was found hanged within a year of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the …

RAFIK ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Rafik Ali filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 18.03.2026 issued by the Superintendent of Police, Kushinagar, under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gunda Control Act, 1970. The State’s Additional Advocate General raised a …

NAGENDRA KUMAR KULSHRESTHA @ NAGENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Nagendra Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner, through his counsel, expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State, represented by the Additional Government …

GYANMATI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Gyanmati and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition alleging that police repeatedly called them for interrogation despite not being named in the FIR lodged under section 137(2) of the Police Act (BNS) in connection with a case against Harishchandra. They sought a mandamus …

SONUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Sonu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an FIR dated 21-04-2026, registered under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that there was no instigation, conspiracy, abetment or mens rea on his part. The State opposed the …

PRAMILA ALIAS PARMILAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Pramila (alias Parmila) filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was pending before the Allahabad High Court. The Court observed that the petition had not been prosecuted and therefore could not …

PRAVEEN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Praveen Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 31.01.2026 registered under Sections 318(4), 351(2), 336, 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought relief and later requested an adjournment to enable repayment of a disputed amount to …

SMT. ANITA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Anita Devi and another, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 5480 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite being listed in the cause list, and the petitioners themselves were absent. The respondents' counsel, …

ANIL KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Anil Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 16‑09‑2018 that named him only as a suspect, not as an accused. The State, through the Advocate General, raised two preliminary objections: (1) the petition was not maintainable because the petitioner was not …

PRADEEP @ GUDDUversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Pradeep @ Guddu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to grant him interim bail, relying on a 2018 Government Order on premature release. The State contended that a subsequent order dated 28‑04‑2025 had negated the earlier order, although the …

VIVEK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vivek Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an FIR dated 23‑03‑2026 registered under Section 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. During the hearing the petitioner withdrew his original relief but …

KESHAN PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Keshan Pal was subjected to a six‑month externment order dated 16‑03‑2026 under Section 3(3) of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970. He appealed the order to the Divisional Commissioner, Prayagraj, under Section 6 of the same Act and simultaneously filed a stay application, but no order was passed …

MAHENDRA KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Mahendra Kumar Mishra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents to register an FIR based on his complaint dated 18‑11‑2025. The respondents, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, raised a …

GULJAR NAVI ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Guljar Navi Ansari filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 17‑April‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 333, 109(1), 131, 352, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The State argued that the incident on 16‑April‑2026 was proved and that the statement of an …

AKHILESH KUMAR PAND EY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Akhilesh Kumar Pandey and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking an order that the State conduct a fair and expeditious investigation of case crime No. 357 of 2025, arising from an FIR dated 28‑09‑2025. The petition was initially filed …

VIKAS @ VISHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 10770 of 2026) was listed before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Ravi Shankar Mishra, was duly notified in the cause list but failed to appear, and no other representative appeared on the petitioner's behalf. The respondents, …

SHIVAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Shivam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 20‑03‑2026 that was lodged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that the decision to prosecute was illegal because the State authorities did not …

SATYENDRA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Satyendra Pratap Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 20.04.2026, which alleged offences under Sections 85, 105 and 123 of the IPC and was registered as a case of murder (Section 304 IPC). The State argued that the FIR prima facie established a …

NITIN NAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Nitin Nagar, a named accused in an FIR dated 24‑02‑2026 (Case Crime No. 23 of 2026), filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking (a) a certiorari to quash the FIR under Sections 103(1), 109, 191(3) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and (b) a mandamus directing the investigating …

SARVAR ALAM @ KALLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sarvar Alam @ Kallu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 10-04-2026 registered under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel voluntarily withdrew the challenge to the FIR and sought only a direction that any …

SHRAVAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Shravan Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking quashment of an FIR dated 18.03.2026 registered under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities Act, 1986. He contended that a single criminal case cannot sustain …

PARVEZ AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Parvez and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 12‑03‑2026 registered under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023. The State argued that the investigation was complete, a charge‑sheet had been filed under Section 193(3) of the BNS …

SUMAN DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Suman Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. The State, represented by the Advocate General, argued that the investigation was …

MOHAMMED GHUFRAN DEHELVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Mohammed Ghufran Dehelvi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State to ensure a free and fair investigation of a crime under several sections of the BNS. The State argued that the investigating officer had already forwarded the charge sheet under …

AMIR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Amir and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 30.01.2026 that alleged offences under various IPC sections, the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 and several provisions of the BNSS. The State, through the …

JAINAB NISHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Jainab Nisha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 6‑3‑2026 and the subsequent charge‑sheet filed under sections 221, 351(2) of the IPC, section 67 of the Income‑Tax Act and sections 7/8 of the POCSO Act. The State argued that the investigation was …

MAMTA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Mamta Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 10-07-2025 registered under Section 103(1) of the BNS. The State, through the Advocate General, submitted that the investigating officer had already forwarded the final police report on 03-04-2026 under …

PRITI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Priti and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6812 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Jitendra Singh and Vipin Kumar, were listed in the cause list but failed to appear to press the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State …

ANSHIKA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Anshika Singh and Salman Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 28.03.2026 in which they were not named and for which no wanted report existed. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, raised a preliminary objection that the …

DHAVENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dhavendra, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8587 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Jitendra Kumar Yadav, was listed in the cause list but did not appear before the Court, nor was any other representative present to press the petition. …

SADDAM HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Saddam Husain filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 25-07-2025 registered under Sections 304-B, 498-A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. After presenting arguments, the petitioner withdrew the primary relief sought but …

RAVI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Ravi Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 30‑11‑2025 that named others but not him, alleging lack of maintainability. The petitioners argued that because they were not named in the FIR, they could not invoke the writ and cited several precedents to …

AKEEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Akeel and Mohammad Shakil Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair and impartial investigation of case crime No. 0140 of 2026, arising from an FIR dated 1 April 2026. They argued that the investigation was biased and that …

ANURAG SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Anurag Srivastava filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6572 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was presented by counsel Rajnish Kumar Srivastava and Siddharth Srivastava, while the respondents were represented by …

RAJKUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08‑03‑2026 registered under several sections of the BNS Act and the D.P. Act. The State argued that a charge‑sheet had already been filed under Section 173(2) of the Cr.P.C. and that the appropriate remedy was an …

SMT SUMAN SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF UP AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Suman Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to investigate false complaints lodged by respondents 5 and 6, and to restrain coercive action against her family. She also requested that any interim orders be vacated. During …

PRAVEEN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Praveen Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 20‑04‑2026 registered under Sections 26, 52 of the Indian Forest Act and Sections 109, 132 BNS. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a …

ARUN KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Arun Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an FIR dated 09‑04‑2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel withdrew the main relief sought but requested that the …

NARENDRA BANSALversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Narendra Bansal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of FIR dated 01.04.2026, alleging that the matter was a civil dispute improperly converted into criminal prosecution under IPC sections 316(2), 352 and 351(2). The State and the first informant opposed, contending …

VIVEK AND 7 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Vivek and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 22‑03‑2026 registered under Section 353(3) and 3(5) BNS. During the hearing, the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court consider their …

HARSHITversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Harshit filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 6 March 2026 registered under Sections 333, 109, 108(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew his challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the …

SURENDRA MOHAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Surendra Mohan and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 17‑04‑2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction …

ANKIT YADAV AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, led by Ankit Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 1‑April‑2026 that alleged offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. During the hearing, the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead …

NARENDRA @ NAGENDRA SINGH GURJAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Narendra @ Nagendra Singh Gurjar and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 challenging an FIR dated 19‑04‑2026 registered under Sections 306, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that a transfer order issued by one of them in the …

SMT BHOORI BEGAMversusSTATE OF UP AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Bhoori Begam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the investigation of FIR No. 45 of 2026 to be concluded. The State, through the Attorney General, argued that the petition was premature as it was filed within three months of the FIR, rendering it …

DEEN DAYAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Deen Dayal and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 25‑04‑2026 registered under IPC sections 137(2), 352 and 351(3) BNS. During the hearing the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower …

VIKRAM KUSHWAHA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Vikram Kushwaha and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04‑03‑2026 registered under Sections 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing they withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction …

KALEY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Kaley and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 29.03.2026 registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. They later withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court consider their bail …

ARNAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Arnav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 03‑04‑2026 registered under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 3(5) of the BNS Act and section 7 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932. The State contended that a firearm injury occurred, several accused …

ALI AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Ali Ahmad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 06-04-2026 registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. During hearing, the petitioner withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court consider his bail …

INDRAWATI URF BINDRAWATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Indrawati Urf Bindrawati Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04-04-2026 registered under Sections 85, 80(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. During the hearing she withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower …

ANCHAL VISHWAKRMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Anchal Vishwakrma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 17‑04‑2026 registered under several IPC provisions and sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The State argued that the FIR was prima facie established based on statements …

POONAM BHARTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Poonam Bharti filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑04‑2026 under Section 105 BNS. During the hearing, she withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court consider her bail application in accordance with the Supreme …

HARISH CHAHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Harish Chahar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20‑04‑2026 registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The State argued that the victim’s injuries established a prima facie case, which the petitioner could not rebut. The petitioner …

VISHWAJEET MAURYA @ GUDDU MINORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Vishwajeet Maurya challenged an FIR dated 27.03.2026 under IPC sections 351(3), 352 and 115(2). The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed on 07.04.2026, so the proper remedy was an application under CrPC Section 528/482, not a writ. The …

FARHAN QURESHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Farhan Qureshi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20.01.2026 under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, alleging that he is a prospective accused though not named in the FIR. The State argued that the petition was not maintainable because the …

SANJEEV KUMAR AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Sanjeev Kumar and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 10‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under several IPC sections. During the hearing, the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that any bail …

RAM BHAROSI AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ram Bharosi and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 29.01.2026 lodged by the widow daughter‑in‑law of petitioner‑1 under sections 329(3), 329(4), 324(4) and 351(4) of the B.N.S. The petitioners later withdrew the challenge to the FIR and …

SINDHU KUMARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Sindhu Kumari and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 21‑02‑2026 under Section 87. After hearing, the petitioners voluntarily withdrew the relief sought but requested that the writ be disposed with a direction to the lower court to consider their …

JAHEER ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Jaheer Alam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police (respondent No.2) to conduct an inquiry under Section 173(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code concerning an incident dated 24‑04‑2025 and to consider a representation dated 22‑09‑2025. The Court …

PARWATI PRAJAPATI @ PARWATI DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Parwati Prajapati and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 22‑02‑2026 lodged by a third‑party informant under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC provisions. The State argued that an earlier FIR dated 03‑02‑2026 had …

JANGALI @ BHAKUDI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Jangali @ Bhakudi and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Sant Ram Nigam, Nitin Dwivedi, Rama Kant Yadav and Vivek Kumar Yadav, were listed in the cause list but failed to appear at the hearing, even after a …

RAM MILAN VISHWAKARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ram Milan Vishwakarma and three others, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 5541 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Amresh Kumar and Shashi Ranjan Srivastava, were listed in the cause list but failed to appear to press the petition. The respondents, …

ABHISHEK @ ABHISHEK KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Abhishek Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 28‑01‑2026 and the subsequent charge sheet filed under various provisions of the B.N.S. and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The State argued …

MAHI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mahi and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel – Adwitiya Prakash Tiwari, Amit Singh and Anshuman Singh – were listed in the cause list but failed to appear even on the revised call. The State’s counsel, G.A., was …

RUBY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ruby and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04‑12‑2025 lodged by Smt. Nesha under Sections 137(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The State, through the Attorney General, argued that the petition lacked any allegation about the petitioners' income …

RAKESH KUMAR MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rakesh Kumar Mishra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 27.01.2026 registered under Sections 351(2), 352 and 333 of the BNSS. The State, represented by the Attorney General, submitted that the investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet …

RAJKUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajkumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08-10-2025 registered under Sections 115, 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS. The State, through the Advocate General, informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed under …

SURESH KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Suresh Kushwaha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑11‑2025 registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew his challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court decide his …

SHIVESH ALIAS BHOLU PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Shivesh alias Bholu Pandey and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 27‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and later added section 117(2), as well as Section 67 of the Income‑Tax Act. After arguments, the …

BHEEM SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Bheem Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR dated 11‑04‑2024 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The State argued that the petition was filed more than two years after the FIR, constituting an inordinate delay and invoking the …

AJAY YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ajay Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR dated 21‑06‑2025 registered under Sections 123, 303(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that …

DHANPRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Dhanprasad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition listed advocates Krishna Kumar Patel and Sangam Lal Kesharwani as counsel, but they did not appear to press the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State …

VIKAS CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Vikas Chaudhary filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking an ad‑interim mandamus directing the DGP of Lucknow to reinvestigate Crime No. 173 of 2023 under IPC sections 504 and 506 and to submit a fresh police report. The State argued that the investigating officer had already filed a …

NIKIT @ ADITYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Nikit @ Aditya, filed a third bail application before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Parvish Kumar, informed the court that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the bail request and sought to have the application withdrawn. The State, represented by the learned …

ASHISH @ CHICHI @ ASHISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 3882 of 2026) was filed by Ashish @ Chichi @ Ashish Kumar against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioner’s counsel, Irshad Ahmad, was listed in the cause list but failed to appear at the hearing, even after a revised call. The respondents, …

ASHMA @SMT AASHMA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ashma and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 15‑12‑2025 registered under various IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State, through the Advocate General, submitted that the investigation was completed, a charge‑sheet dated …

RAJAF @ RAJJABversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajaf @ Rajjab filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 01.11.2025 that alleged offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. While the writ was pending, the petitioner was arrested on 12.02.2026 and the investigating …

VIKRAM SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Vikram Singh, owner of a vehicle that was used to transport a cow and its progeny, challenged an FIR dated 23 September 2025 filed under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cows Slaughter Act, 1955 (sections 3, 5A, 8, 5B) and the Arms Act, 1959 (sections 3, 25). He argued that he had no …

MOINUDDIN @ JAMMU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Moinuddin @ Jammu and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 19-10-2025 and the subsequent charge sheet filed on 10-04-2026 under various sections of the BNSS. The State argued that the charge sheet had already been filed, exonerating petitioners …

YADUVIR SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Yaduvir Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 07‑09‑2025 registered under several IPC offences. After investigation, the police filed a charge‑sheet on 15‑12‑2025 under Section 193(3) CrPC, charging two petitioners and exonerating the …

HEMANT SRIVASTAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Hemant Srivastav and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 1135 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. After subsequent developments, they sought to withdraw the petition, filing a withdrawal application. The State of U.P. and other respondents, represented by the …

MOHAN PRAKASH @ MOHAN MITTALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohan Prakash challenged an FIR dated 20‑12‑2025 registered under Section 111(2)(b) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. He filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but later withdrew the substantive prayer, asking only that the court …

VIKRANT THAKURversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vikrant Thakur, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR dated 08‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 103(1), 333, 109(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, including a charge of murder under Section 302. The State, represented by the …

GAURAV GOYALversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Gaurav Goyal filed a writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 31‑01‑2026 under sections 352 and 109(1) of the BNS, alleging that the dispute with the informant Harsh Garg had been amicably settled by a written settlement deed dated 19‑02‑2026. Both the State’s A.G. and the …

VIPIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Vipin Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 17.01.2026 and a notice dated 24.08.2024 issued by respondents under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Goondas Act, 1970. The petitioner alleged inherent mistakes in the petition and argued that …

DEVENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Devendra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a stay of an order dated 17-01-2026 and a notice dated 24-08-2024 issued under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Goondas Act, 1970. The petitioner alleged inherent mistakes in the petition that could not be remedied by a supplementary …

DEVENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Devendra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under IPC sections 74, 333, 351(3) BNS and POCSO Act sections 7 and 8. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that …

RAMAKANT PANDEY AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ramakant Pandey and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 15-02-2026 registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 110 of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing the petitioners withdrew their prayer to quash the FIR and …

MANISH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Manish and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 27‑01‑2026 under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 324(2). The petitioners claimed that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and executed a compromise affidavit on 03‑02‑2026, arguing that …

TULSI PATHAK AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Tulsi Pathak and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking quash of an FIR dated 21-02-2026, registered under sections 61(2) and 87 BNS, alleging that the alleged victim’s modesty was forcibly removed and no consent was given. The State, …

SURAJ AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

Petitioners Suraj and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 25.01.2026 registered under sections 137(2), 87, 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought relief against the FIR but later the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw …

RAKESH SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rakesh Singh and four others, challenged an FIR dated 02‑02‑2026 filed by Vimal Kumar Singh under sections 191(2), 351(2), 352 and 324(4) of the IPC, alleging that the criminal case arose out of a civil land‑dispute involving consolidation proceedings under the U.P. Consolidation of …

AVNISH BHADAURIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Avnish Bhadauriya filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 15‑01‑2026 lodged by informant Rajkumar under several IPC sections. The State argued that a second FIR dated 18‑01‑2026 was filed by the petitioner’s side, indicating that the incident was …

BIRENDRA CHATURVEDI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Birendra Chaturvedi and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 25‑12‑2025 under IPC sections 115(2), 351(2) and 352. The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed on 21‑02‑2026 under CrPC section 193(3), and …

PRADEEP SONI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Pradeep Soni and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 13‑11‑2025 registered under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State argued that the investigation was complete and a …

MOHD. KAUSAR @ MONU AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, married to the complainant, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 28‑02‑2024 that alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had amicably settled their matrimonial …

ABHISHEK KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Abhishek Kushwaha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20‑09‑2025 and the subsequent chargesheet filed under various sections of the B.N.S. and the D.P. Act. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted that the chargesheet had already been …

SHIV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

Shiv Kumar, the first informant, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State respondents to conduct a fair investigation into a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 120‑B IPC. The State, represented by the Advocate General, …

RUKHSAR KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petitioners, Rukhsar Khatoon and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of FIR No. 137(2) BNS dated 13‑04‑2025 and protection from arrest. They contended that both were adults at the time of the alleged incident, relying on birth certificates and Aadhaar details, …