Created by Fuzzy Cloud

RAJEEV SINGH

15 judgments · newest first · showing 1–15

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. LKO.versusBHANU PRATAP AND OTHERS

Decided by Lok Adalat

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. filed a first appeal against an order dated 213 of 2022. The appellant failed to appear before the court and did not request any adjournment. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, that was in …

MASLAHUDDIN and ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TECHNICAL EDUCATION LKO.andORS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioners, Maslahuddin and others, filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No.‑20119 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh represented by the Principal Secretary, Technical Education, Lucknow. The petition was argued by counsel …

RAJENDRA DUTT SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TECHNICAL EDU. and ORS.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Petitioner Rajendra Dutt Sharma filed Writ‑A No. 19931 of 2021 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary, Technical Education and others. The petition was presented by counsel Mohammad Tauseef Siddiqui, while the …

OM PRAKASH CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TRANSPORT and ORS.

DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Om Prakash Chaurasiya filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, and only the State's counsel was present. The Court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted. …

SMT.KALAWATIversusCHANDRA PRAKASH AND ORS.

Decided by Lok Adalat

Kalawati filed a first appeal against Order No. 862 of 2013. The appellant's counsel had not taken steps to summon the case records as required. The court, noting the office report dated 17.10.2022, observed this non‑compliance. It granted the appellant one week to procure the records. The order …