Created by Fuzzy Cloud

RAJESH S PATIL

67 judgments · newest first · showing 1–67

Megha Sandeep Kanjoje Alias Megha Sudhakar ManeversusSandeep Pyarelal Kanoje

Allowed

The wife (applicant) filed two miscellaneous civil applications seeking transfer of her pending divorce petition and a domestic violence (D.V.) proceeding from courts in Mumbai to the Family Court in Pune, citing her relocation to Pune with her six‑year‑old daughter. The applicant highlighted an …

UNION OF INDIAversusSTATE TRADING CORPORATION and ANR.

Dismissed

The Union of India (Railways) appealed against the Railway Claims Tribunal’s award in favor of State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. and New India Assurance for a shortage of 6,159 kg of rape seed oil during transit, valued at Rs.58,510.50 with interest. The Tribunal had held that a notice under …

SHAILESH MANILAL SHETH AND ANR.versusNANASAHEB SHANKARDAS MUKADAM

Allowed

Nanasaheb Shankardas Mukadam filed a civil revision against Shailesh Manilal Sheth and others. An interim application was filed to record the legal heirs of a deceased respondent, which faced no objection and was allowed. The respondents also filed a civil application seeking permission to …

Omkar Sitaram ParabversusDeepali Omkar Parab

Allowed

The husband, Omkar Sitaram Parab, applied to transfer a domestic violence proceeding filed by his wife, Deepali Omkar Parab, from the JMFC, Mulund to the Family Court, Bandra, arguing that he had already filed a restitution of conjugal rights suit in the latter court and that transfer would save …

Vinod Gopaldas SoniversusMadhubala Vinod Soni

Allowed

The applicant, Vinod Gopaldas Soni, acknowledged an outstanding arrear of Rs.4,10,000 payable to the respondent, Madhubala Vinod Soni, and undertook to pay 50% within eight weeks and the balance within a further twelve weeks. The applicant’s counsel submitted this undertaking, which the court …

Pooja GandhiversusDevang Gandhi

Allowed

The applicant, wife of the respondent, filed a transfer application seeking to move the divorce petition pending in the Family Court, Belapur, to the Family Court, Bandra, on grounds of personal safety and convenience. She alleges that the respondent, a politically influential person, has lodged …

POONAM PARMESHWAR YEDEversusPARMESHWAR BHAGWAN YEDE

Allowed

The applicant, wife of the respondent, filed a transfer application seeking to move divorce proceedings from the Civil Judge Senior Division, Kalyan to the Civil Judge Senior Division, Rahata, citing a distance of about 218 km and her dependence on elderly parents for support. The respondent …

MR. PAWAN PRAKASH BADGUJARversusMRS. PRIYANKA PAWAN BADGUJAR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Mr. Pawan Prakash Badgujar, filed a miscellaneous civil application which the respondent, Mrs. Priyanka Pawan Badgujar, challenged on the ground of maintainability before the bench. The applicant sought leave to withdraw the application and re‑file before the Aurangabad bench. The …

SHRI SHYAM NARAYAN RUDRAKARversusSHRI SURESH GANGARAM KHALADKAR and ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Shri Shyam Narayan Rudrakar, was a tenant of a ground‑floor commercial premises of about 120 sq.ft. in Pune, which he used for a furniture shop and as a lodge. The respondents, including Shri Suresh Gangaram Khaladkar, claimed bona‑fide requirement of the premises for their own …

K.S.SREENIVASANversusV.VENKATARAMAN and ORS.

Disposed Off

The appellant K.S. Sreenivasan filed a first appeal in 2007 which resurfaced in the High Court of Bombay on 2 July 2026. The respondent filed a praecipe for circulation, but no representative appeared for the respondent. The appellant's counsel, Mr. Akash Singh, informed the court that the appellant …

RANCHOD BIJIA TANDELversusSHRI. KALAN BIJIA

Transfer to other Court

The appellant Ranchod Bijia Tandel filed a first appeal (No. 209 of 2003) before the Bombay High Court against Kalan Bijia. The Assistant Registrar reported that, under Section 25A of the Goa, Daman and Diu Civil Courts Act, 1965, appeals with a subject‑matter value not exceeding ten lakh rupees …

Ish Homes Pvt LtdversusKalpesh Kumar Parmanand Dave

Allowed

The Court received a mediation report dated 12 February 2026 indicating that mediation between the parties had failed. Counsel for the applicant argued that MCA No. 509 of 2024 and MCA No. 520 of 2024 had become infructuous because the related appeals before the Small Causes Court were disposed of …

Rama Bipin PandeyversusBipin Prabhakar Pandey

Allowed

The wife, Rama Bipin Pandey, applied to transfer her divorce proceedings from the CJSD Vasai to the CJSD Kalyan, arguing that the long journey from Washim and lack of a male escort made attendance at Vasai impracticable, especially as she also faces domestic‑violence and Section 498A criminal …

K.V. AMBU KUNHIversusTHE MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY

Dismissed

The appellant, Shri K. V. Ambu Kunhi, filed an appeal against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay concerning notices issued under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. The appellant failed to appear before the court on the scheduled dates, including the hearing on 25 June …

Priyanka Ravindra LadversusVishal Bhisale alias Shyam Ravikant Bhisale

Allowed

The applicant, a wife residing in Mumbai with her parents and an autistic six‑year‑old daughter, filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking transfer of a marriage petition pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sindhudurg, to the Family Court at Bandra. The husband had not paid …

VILAS YESHWANT NAKHAREKARversusVALLABH PARMAR

Allowed

In a writ petition (No. 4942 of 2002) before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners sought relief against the respondent. Two interim applications were filed: one to record a new trustee after the death of the previous trustee, and another to record the legal heirs of a deceased respondent. The …

HARBHAJAN SINGH B. AJIMALversusJILEDAR SINGH PARASNATH SINGH

Allowed

Harbhajan Singh B. Ajimal filed an interim application in a writ petition seeking to record the legal heirs of the deceased respondent Jiledar Singh Parasnath Singh. The respondents, represented by Advocate D. Mishra, raised no objection to the filing of the application. The Court examined whether …

SURENDRAPRASAD SURYANARAYAN PANDEversusP. LOKNATH SHETTY

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an interim order of the Trial Court. While the petition was pending, the underlying civil suit was finally disposed by an order dated 2 May 2024. The respondent argued that the disposal of the suit rendered the writ petition infructuous. The High …

SURENDRAPRASAD SURYANARAYAN PANDEversusSUBHEDAR S. MISHRA

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an interim order passed by the Trial Court. While the writ petition was pending, the underlying civil suit before the Trial Court was finally disposed on 2 May 2024. The respondent's counsel argued that the disposal of the suit rendered the writ …

SURENDRAPRASAD SURYANARAYAN PANDEversusSHRI. MADHU HIMMAT SINGH

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an interim order of the trial court. While the petition was pending, the underlying suit before the trial court was disposed on 11 July 2024. The respondent argued that the disposal of the suit rendered the writ petition infructuous. The court …

SURENDRAPRASAD SURYANARAYAN PANDEversusSHANTIDEVI MRUTUNJAY MISHRA

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Surendraprasad Suryanarayan Pandey, filed a writ petition challenging an interim order passed by the trial court. The respondent, Shantidevi Mrutunjay Mishra, was represented by Advocate A. A. Khan. The respondent argued that the underlying civil suit, which formed the basis of the …

AJINKYA ASHOK KESKARversusABOLI AJINKYA KESKAR

Disposed Off

The husband (Applicant) filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking transfer of a restitution of conjugal rights suit, originally filed by his wife (Respondent) in the Family Court at Latur, to the CJSD in Pune, arguing that both spouses work in the corporate sector in Pune and that the transfer …

ASHIWNI RAJENDRA CHAVAIversusRAJENDRA BALASAHEB CHAVAI

Disposed Off

The wife (applicant) sought transfer of her pending divorce proceedings from the Principal Family Court, Sangli to the Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, citing her residence in Pune with her parents and minor son and the respondent's non‑payment of maintenance. The husband (respondent), employed in …

DR KUMUD PATEL AND ASSOCIATES AND ORSversusKUMUD MANGALDAS PATEL AND ORS

Disposed Off

The applicants, Dr. Kumud Patel & Associates and others, filed a miscellaneous civil application before the Bombay High Court seeking an extension of time to carry out an amendment as directed by the Court on 30 April 2026. The applicants, through counsel Tanjul Sharma (appearing on behalf of Dhruve …

SHRI.NIRMALKUMAR CHIRANJILAL JAGOTAversusSHRI.CHANDRAKANT GOVIND BHIDE

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Nirmalkumar Chiranjee Lal Jagota, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. During the proceedings, an office note revealed that the petitioner had died. No legal heirs or representatives appeared before the Court to continue the petition. The Court considered whether the …

SHIVAM SAKHARAM PARTEversusTHE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER NO.17 PUNE AND ORS.

Disposed Off

Santosh Dagadu Sane filed Interim Application No. 115 of 2026 seeking additional time to amend pleadings in First Appeal No. 90 of 2023. The Court had earlier, on 10 April 2026, granted permission to amend but mistakenly cited FA No. 154 of 2024. The applicant reiterated the request for further time …

PALLAVI GANESH GANGURDEversusGANESH SANJAY GANGAURDE

Disposed Off

The wife, Pallavi Ganesh Gangurde, filed a transfer application seeking to move divorce proceedings initiated by her husband before the Family Court at Nashik to the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai. She resides in Kandivali with her parents and a seven‑year‑old daughter, is a homemaker and receives …

SANTOSH DAGDU SANEversusTHE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER NO 17 PUNE.

Disposed Off

Santosh Dagadu Sane filed Interim Application No. 115 of 2026 seeking additional time to amend pleadings in First Appeal No. 90 of 2023. The Court had earlier, on 10 April 2026, granted permission to amend but mistakenly cited FA No. 154 of 2024. The applicant reiterated the request for further time …

AZIZ T. DOHADWALAversusMRS.N.V.KADAM AND OTHERS

Compromised/Consent Terms

The High Court, on 22 August 2017, dealt with a civil revision application where the applicant, Aziz T. Dohadwala, had been ordered on 9 April 2013 to serve several respondents within three weeks or face dismissal of the criminal revision application (CRA) for non‑prosecution. The Registry endorsed …

MOHAN RAMCHANDRA KAMBLIversusSUHASINI SAINATH KAMATH and ORS.

Rejected

The landlord filed an eviction suit alleging bona fide requirement and subletting. The tenant (defendant no.1) did not testify, while defendant no.2 (the petitioner) claimed to have purchased the premises but produced no documentary proof of ownership. The trial and appellate courts upheld eviction …

PRASAD ATAMRAM KARANDIKARversusUSHA P. PANDIT

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Prasad Atamram Karandikar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondent, Usha P. Pandit. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel applied to withdraw the petition, stating that the parties had settled their dispute amicably. The court …

RAJKUMAR C. AGARWALversusSMT. MADHUBEN HIRALAL MEHTA

Dismissed

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the concurrent findings of the trial and appellate courts that had rejected his standard rent application for premises in Kalbadevi, Mumbai. He argued that the monthly rent of Rs.136.63 since 1977 and the building's 80‑year age warranted a standard …

AMOL PADMAKAR DHAMDHEREversusRAJIV PADMAKAR DHAMDHERE

Disposed Off

The applicant Amol Padmakar Dhamdhere sought correction of an earlier order dated 18 March 2026 which mistakenly omitted the case number in reference to a testamentary suit. The court was also requested to extend the deadline for uploading the written agreement in the said suit. Justice Rajesh S. …

ALI-AKBAR HUSSAINALI SHIRZADEversusTOKARSHI KANJI

Rule Discharged

The petitioner, originally a tenant, filed an eviction suit against the respondent alleging a bonafide requirement for the premises, which he had sublet. The trial court dismissed the suit, and the appellate court affirmed the dismissal, noting that the petitioner was simultaneously subletting other …

SHRI RAMCHANDRA GOVIND GEHANIversusSHRI MOHD. HANIF ABDUL SHAIKH

Dismissed

The landlord, Shri Ramchandra Govind Gehani, filed a civil revision challenging the trial and appellate courts' concurrent findings that his eviction suit under the Rent Act should be dismissed. The landlord relied on three grounds: the tenant’s alleged willful default in rent, unauthorized …

MANHARLAL KALIDASversusN DEVELOPERS AND CO AND ORS

Disposed Off

The respondent No.1, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), filed an interim application seeking leave to file a vakalatnama on behalf of the HUF. The applicant's counsel argued that the original plaintiff had been served by pasting a notice on the door and that the plaintiff's lawyer had also been served, …

PANNALAL CHUNILAL JAINversusRAGHUVEER WAMAN DINDORKAR AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The petition under Article 227 challenged an appellate decree that granted eviction of a tenant on the ground of bonafide requirement. The original eviction suit was filed by the landlord on three grounds – default in rent, bonafide requirement and permanent alterations. The trial court had decreed …

SHRI.MANOHAR J. CHANDWANI.versusSMT.HARIBAI TILUMAL THADANI.

RULE ABSOLUTE

In Writ Petition No. 10 WP/1303/1999, the petitioner and respondent submitted a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 29‑10‑2025, which they both signed, seeking to settle the dispute out of court. The court accepted the MOU as a binding undertaking and, relying on Paragraph 5 of the MOU, ordered …

HRIDAYNATH D KADU DESHMUKHversusSURENDRA DATTATRAY KADU AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Applicant, half‑brother of Petitioners, sought clarification of the High Court's order dated 20 October 2023 in Writ Petition No. 5618 of 2014, alleging that the order had not decided the title of a property in Dhankawadi, Pune or the issuance of TDR/DRC. The property, originally belonging to …

DINSHAW SORABJEE GAE (DESD) LRS.versusJ.N. GAZDAR and ORS.

Dismissed

The petitioners, Diksha Rane and others, filed a writ petition arising from R.A.N. proceedings before the Small Causes Court. The petition was scheduled for hearing on 13 February 2026. The petitioners failed to appear at that hearing and had also not appeared on earlier occasions. The Court …

Ankur Atul ShahversusState ofMaharashtra

Disposed Off

The applicant filed an interim application seeking restoration of Criminal Application No. 377 of 2016, which pertained to obtaining leave to file an appeal. The court noted a delay in filing the interim application but, after hearing counsel and reviewing the application, found sufficient grounds …

PRAKASH BAPU WANIversusNISHIKANT M. BAMNODKAR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The original complainant filed a criminal application for special leave to appeal against a judgment of the 7th JMFC, Kalyan, which had acquitted the accused. The Public Prosecutor argued that the accused was a habitual offender, had been convicted in another case, and that in the present case the …

SUN-UP INDIA ENGINEERING INDUSTRIESversusEMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION

Disposed Off

Sun-Up India Engineering Industries appealed against Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) alleging a contribution liability. The respondent contended that the contribution due had already been recovered, rendering the appeal moot. The appellant further informed the court that its proprietor …

ISMAIL IMAM SHAIKH AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicants, Ismail Imam Shaikh and another, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. Their counsel, Piyush Toshnival, sought leave to withdraw the application. The Court considered the request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the Court …

DEEPESH KORANJIRATHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Deepesh Koranjirath filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant sought leave to withdraw the application on instructions. The court considered the request and noted that the applicant was not on board, but allowed the withdrawal. …

Rohan Anant PakhurdeversusMadhura Mohan Rane

Rejected

The husband filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking transfer of domestic violence (DV) proceedings, filed by his wife before a Metropolitan Magistrate, to the Family Court where his divorce suit was pending. The applicant’s counsel initially claimed the wife worked in Bangalore, later …

PRIYANKA DAWANE ALIAS PRIYANKA TAUSIF PATHANversusTOUSIF BABA PATHAN

Allowed

The applicant, Priyanka Dawane, residing in Thane with her eight‑year‑old daughter, filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking transfer of her divorce petition from the Family Court, Pune to the Family Court, Thane, citing inconvenience due to the 160 km distance and a pending interim …

WP/2930/1996 of SMT. BANSADEVI WD/O.RAJNARAYAN BACHHANSINGH Vs

Disposed Off

The writ petition, originally filed in 1996 by Smt. Bansadevi, remained pending in the Bombay High Court for decades. The Court's Case Information System indicated the matter as pending, but the Registry could not locate any records of the proceedings. On 29 September 2025, the Registry issued a …

BAPU B. MURADEversusBALWANT D. KHALKAR and ORS.

Disposed Off

The writ petition filed in 1996 remained pending and could not be located in the Court's records. The Registry issued a notice on 29 September 2025, publishing a list of under‑search matters and requesting the advocates to confirm the status of the petition and provide a copy if it was still …