Created by Fuzzy Cloud

RANJAN GOGOI

224 judgments · newest first · showing 201–224

VIRESHWAR SINGH & ORS.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

2014 INSC 586

The case concerned General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) appointed on an ad‑hoc basis in two phases (Phase‑I: 1982‑86; Phase‑II: 1986‑89) by a specially constituted selection committee, contrary to the Delhi Municipal Corporation Health Service Recruitment Regulations, 1982 which required UPSC …

TOLYA ETC.versusSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. ETC.

2014 INSC 559Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were allotted surplus agricultural land by the State of Madhya Pradesh in 1973 under Section 35 of the Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960, which conferred Bhumiswami rights. Within two years they purportedly sold the land to the respondent by a deed that the …

AKALAKUNNAM VILLAGE SERVICE CO-OP. BANK LTD. AND ANOTHERversusBINU N. AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 551Dismissed

The Akalakunnam Village Service Co‑op Bank issued a notification to fill one Attender and three Peon posts, reserving one for SC/ST candidates, and conducted a written test and interview. Three applicants filed a writ petition challenging the notification, alleging non‑compliance with Rule 182(5) of …

SMT. USHA KAPOOR & ORS.versusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 991Dismissed

The Government of India issued two notices in 2001‑2002 for the resumption of a 3.20‑acre bungalow site in the Allahabad cantonment, invoking powers under Order No.179 of the Governor‑General‑in‑Council dated 12 September 1836. The appellants, Smt. Usha Kapoor and others, contended that they owned …

NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY & ORS.versusTRIPPLE ENGINEERING WORKS

2014 INSC 543Dismissed

The North Eastern Railway terminated two contracts awarded to the respondent contractor in 1994, after which arbitration proceedings were initiated in 1996 under a clause that required the arbitrators to be gazetted railway officers. Despite the passage of nearly two decades, no arbitral award had …

PURSHOTTAM DAS TANDON DEAD BY LRS.versusMILITARY ESTATE OFFICER & ORS.

2014 INSC 541Dismissed

The appellant, the estate of the deceased, claimed ownership of a bungalow and the land on which it stood, asserting title derived from a purchase in 1848. The Union of India contended that an 1836 grant vested only the building in the appellant’s ancestors, with the land remaining subject to a …

NAWAL KISHORE SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 534Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former seaman of the Shipping Corporation of India, was declared medically unfit and his registration was cancelled by the Shipping Department in Mumbai. He filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking disability compensation, claiming that a refusal letter was sent to his …

NARINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2014 INSC 509Dismissed

The appellant, Narinder Singh, was accused of offering a bribe of Rs.10,000 to the Additional District Magistrate of Bharmour to obtain supply orders for double‑decker beds. The trial court acquitted him, but the High Court set aside that judgment, convicted him under Section 12 of the Prevention of …

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITIEEversusBANNAMA (D) BY LRS.

2014 INSC 508Dismissed

Bannama, an elderly agriculturist, claimed a 7‑acre plot as her stridhan and sued for declaration of title and possession after her son, Nagi Reddy, fraudulently had the land mutated in his name and sold it to the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee. The trial court and the Karnataka High Court …

K V.S. RAOversusC.B.I & ORS

2014 INSC 180Case Allowed

The petitioners sought transfer of two criminal proceedings pending in the Special Court, Lucknow, to the Special Court, Delhi, arguing that the cases were similar in nature and that most witnesses were medical officers, with the ultimate decision taken at the ministerial level in Delhi. The CBI …

POOJA BHATIAversusVISHNU NARAIN SHIVPURI & ANR.

2014 INSC 179Appeal(s) allowed

Vishnu Narayan Shivpuri was charged under IPC sections 342, 326‑8 and 506 for allegedly throwing sulphuric acid on his wife, Pooja Bhatia. The Sessions Court denied his bail, but the High Court later released him on bail. After his release, the Superintendent of Police submitted a counter‑affidavit …

BACHU DASversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 919Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant filed a criminal complaint under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 448 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The Sessions Judge held that a prima facie case was made out against the accused. The High Court, however, …

R. SUBRAMANIAMversusMURUGAPPA GOUNDER AND ORS.

2014 INSC 917Appeal(s) allowed

In a contempt proceeding before the Madras High Court, Respondents tendered an unconditional apology in the form of an affidavit, which the Single Judge accepted. Despite this acceptance, the Judge directed the Principal Secretary & Commissioner of Land Administration to initiate appropriate action …

PAWAN KUMAR & ANR. ETC.versusM/S HARKISHAN DASS MOHAN LAL & ORS

2014 INSC 62Appeal(s) allowed

The claimants, passengers in a jeep that collided with a fleeing truck, sought compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 after two of them were killed and one injured. The High Court held both the truck and the jeep responsible but apportioned liability 70% to the truck driver/owner and 30% to …

UNION OF INDIAversusFACULTY ASSOCIATION OF ALLMS

[2014] 14 S.C.R. 1651Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained review petitions filed by the Union of India challenging its earlier decision on reservation in faculty posts at AIIMS. The issue centered on whether Articles 15, 16 and 335 of the Constitution permit reservation in super‑specialty faculty positions. The Court clarified …

A.M. SANGAPPA @ SANGAPPAversusSANGONDEPPA & ANR.

2013 INSC 759Disposed off

The appellant, A.M. Sangappa, challenged a judgment of the Karnataka High Court in a regular first appeal (RFA No. 238 of 2004). The issue was whether the High Court had complied with the procedural requirements of Order 41 Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which obliges a court hearing …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.versusSARVA SHRAMIK SANGH, SANGLI AND ORS.

2013 INSC 708Disposed off

The State of Maharashtra terminated the services of 256 workmen employed on 25 lift‑irrigation schemes after transferring the schemes to a sugar factory. The workmen claimed entitlement to reinstatement and backwages, arguing that the termination was a breach of Section 25N of the Industrial …

SHRIDHAR NAMDEO LAWANDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2013 INSC 511Disposed off

The appellant, Shridhar Namdeo Lawand, was convicted under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and appealed to the High Court. The High Court disposed of the appeal without the appellant being present and without examining the evidence, relying solely on the State’s counsel. …

SHIV NANDAN MAHTOversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2013 INSC 449Appeal(s) allowed

Shiv Nandan Mahto was appointed as a clerk in a school in 1979, but an inspection report mistakenly recorded him as a librarian. When the school was taken over by the State of Bihar in 1983, his services were not transferred because the librarian post was not approved. Despite representations, he …

VIJAY JAINversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2013 INSC 370Appeal(s) allowed

Vijay Jain and co‑accused were convicted under Section 8/21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of brown sugar seized during a police raid. The trial court and the High Court held that the seized contraband had been produced in court, despite the …

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSHOBHA RAM

2013 INSC 37Disposed off

The State of Rajasthan prosecuted two brothers, A-1 and A-2, for murdering Trilokchand under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, alleging a long‑standing dispute over a well. The trial court, relying on the sole eye‑witness PW‑6, convicted both brothers, holding that A‑1 threw stones while A‑2 sat on …

IQBAL ABDUL SAMIYA MALEKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2012 INSC 440Disposed off

The appellants, convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, appealed to the Gujarat High Court. The High Court affirmed the conviction without examining the complete record, including oral and documentary evidence, merely narrating the prosecution and defence cases. …

RAMESH CHILWAL @ BOMBAYYAversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2012 INSC 295Disposed off

Ramesh Chilwal was convicted of murder under IPC s.302, offences under the Gangsters Act s.213 and the Arms Act s.27, and sentenced to life imprisonment, ten years rigorous imprisonment, and seven years rigorous imprisonment respectively, along with fines and compensation. The High Court affirmed …