Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
97 judgments · newest first · showing 1–97
The petitioner, Umesh Namdeo Sangolkar, filed a writ petition seeking the registration of a crime under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The respondents indicated that charges under Sections 304B, 498-A, and 306 read with Section 34 IPC had already been framed against the petitioner. The …
The applicant, Mahadev Kisan Khatkale, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. After the charge‑sheet was filed, the investigating agency dropped his name from the prosecution. The applicant’s counsel then sought leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court …
The applicant K.G.N. Baba Traders filed an application seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court considered the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran, which held that a victim has a statutory right to …
The petitioner, Sahil Ragunath Kamble, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition and to be allowed to file a fresh criminal revision application. The Court considered the request and, …
The applicant, Shrikant Tolu Ghadshi, filed a criminal application seeking leave to unconditionally withdraw the pending application before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. Counsel for the applicant submitted a request for withdrawal. The Court considered the submission and exercised its …
The petitioner, Pandurang Shrirang Gavhane, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the State of Maharashtra to transfer the criminal investigation to an independent agency. The respondent argued that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, and therefore the petitioner could approach the trial …
Popat Ramchandra Durge filed a writ petition (No. 222 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, which was later joined by an intervenor application filed by Mr. Kuldeep Nikam. The intervenor sought to be allowed to withdraw his appearance, and the petitioner subsequently …
The petitioner, Cherrie Alexander, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later moved the Court requesting permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered …
The petitioners, Rajesh Mahadeo Sangar and another, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, the petitioners, through counsel Nikhil N. Pawar, applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the …
The petitioner, Sanjay Dada Gele, challenged a one‑year externment order dated 24 December 2025 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Vita. He argued that his appeal filed on 9 January 2026 had not been listed for hearing and that the four‑month period of the order had already elapsed, warranting a …
The applicant filed an application for leave to appeal against an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the applicant sought transfer of the appeal to the District and …
The applicants, Sachin Suresh Suryavanshi and Kunal Bharat Konde, filed anticipatory bail applications (Nos. 212 and 213 of 2026) after a B Summary Report was filed against them in a Sangli incident. They argued they were in Pune at the time of the alleged offence and that the complaint was filed …
Petitioner Pratik Bhanudas More filed a criminal writ petition alleging that a report dated 21 October 2023 filed before the Special Court under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 had not been decided, thereby adversely affecting his employability and …
The Janseva Samiti filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash a notice dated 20/04/2026 that cancelled its agreements dated 01/09/2001 and 15/06/2001 to operate public toilets at Mangalwedha and Kurdawadi bus stands, and to compel the State to continue those …
The petitioner, Hajrat Peer Malik Rehman Dargah, filed an interim application seeking permission to conduct Bakri Eid and Urus celebrations, including the slaughter of sheep, goats and hens, on the grounds that it had complied with earlier court orders. The State of Maharashtra opposed the relief, …
The petitioner, Arun Prabhakar Bandekar, filed an interim application seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 5905 of 2017 after the High Court had dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution on 7 May 2026. The application was filed on 8 May 2026, invoking the need to revive the earlier proceedings. …
The petitioners, Karvir Nivasini Mahalaxmi Ispat Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a writ petition seeking interim directions to restrain Respondent No.2, a bank, from acting on a notice dated 16 May 2026 because the Presiding Officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Pune, was on leave from 26 May to 2 June …
The petitioner, Subhash Balwant Kadam, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh petition on the same …
The applicant, Balu Babu Pawar, filed an application seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320), the applicant requested that the …
The applicant, Shivaji Dhondiba Patil, filed an application for leave to appeal against an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. He sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. Celestium …
The petitioner, Vijay K. Sawant, filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief against Senior Police Inspector and others. He later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh application or complaint before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class. …
The petitioner, a society/trust, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra not to enter its premises without due legal procedure and to refrain from disturbing the premises during the pendency of the petition. The relief sought was framed as a protection of property …
The applicant filed a petition seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) which held that a victim may appeal an acquittal under Section 372 …
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition in 2016 seeking a blanket order that no action be initiated against him. The petition was never circulated before hearing and the petitioner was absent. The court noted that the prayers were vague and general. Considering the lack of circulation and the …
The petitioners, Shankar Rajaram Ghadigaonkar and others, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The petition was filed after they were acquitted in the underlying criminal case. The petitioners argued that the acquittal rendered the petition unnecessary. The …
The petitioner, Kumari Suraiyya Sahebhal Desai, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition and filed an affidavit in support. The Court considered the application and, finding no …
The petitioner, Reshma Digambar Mane, filed a writ petition challenging the Ashta Municipal Council's refusal to grant a No Objection Certificate (NOC). The petitioner later obtained the NOC from the council. Upon receipt of the NOC, counsel submitted that the purpose of the petition had been …
The petitioner, Shri Yuvraj Shamrao Jadhav, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra and others to decide a representation dated 6 February 2015, which essentially complained against Mr R.S. Patil. The Court observed that the matter related to the year 2016, had not been …
The petitioner, Hanumant Shankar Gujar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. The petitioner’s counsel, on instructions, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, exercising its inherent jurisdiction, granted permission for withdrawal. …
Petitioner Chandrakant Shankar Pawar filed a writ petition challenging his appointment to a board, alleging that his inclusion was wrongful. The High Court examined whether the appointment complied with applicable legal standards. Finding that the petitioner was indeed wrongly placed on the board, …
The applicant, Gorakh Shiva Kambale, filed a leave to appeal application challenging his acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and sought to have the appeal transferred to the District and Sessions Court in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. Celestium …
The petitioner, Sanjay Ashok Bhange, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. The trial in the underlying criminal matter had already commenced. Counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition, arguing that the trial …
The applicant, Jaysinh Ramchandra Ghorpade, filed an application for leave to appeal against an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He sought to have the appeal transferred to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. …
The applicant, Jaysinh Ramchandra Ghorpade, filed an application seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that the appeal should be …
The applicant, Sachin Bhupal Desai, filed a petition seeking leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320), he requested that the appeal be …
The petitioner, Prashant Sarjerao Fasale, filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of a member (Respondent No.4) of the District Selection Committee of Zilla Parishad, Sindhudurg. An interim application was filed seeking an early hearing of the petition. The Court considered the age of the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an action, but a 'C' summary report was subsequently filed in the case. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the filing of the summary report rendered the petition infructuous. The Court agreed that the existence of the summary report made further …
Petitioner Jaywant Babaso Olekar filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later requested permission to withdraw the petition, stating it had become infructuous. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, …
The petitioner, Mukund Hanumant Jadhavar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Department of Agriculture. During proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and held that there …
The petitioner, Reshma Digambar Mane, filed a writ petition challenging the Ashta Municipal Council's refusal to grant a No Objection Certificate (NOC). The petitioner later obtained the NOC from the council. Upon receipt of the NOC, counsel submitted that the purpose of the petition had been …
The Bombay High Court, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, heard applications No.1 of 2019 and No.521 of 2015 filed by Gautam Vijay Savadi (and Vijay Bhupal Savadi) against Ankush Ramesh Desphande and others. The matter pertained to a criminal appeal, and the court issued notices to the respondents. …
The petitioner, Sunita Anna Helkar, filed a writ petition but failed to provide a required copy of a document despite being directed to do so. The court noted that a last chance to submit the copy was granted on 4 March 2026, which the petitioner did not utilize. The judges then gave the petitioner …
The petitioner, Shri Dnyaneshwar Jotiram Gove, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. The petitioner's counsel, on instructions, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, exercising its inherent jurisdiction, considered the request. It …
The petitioner, Dipeshri Rajaram Chavan, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the proceedings against the accused. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the accused had already been convicted by the Additional Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 04 of 2018 on 30 October 2025. …
The petitioner, Babasaheb Devappa Mulik, filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel later applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were …
The petitioners filed writ petitions in 2013 seeking a court order to restrain the Railway Protection Force from conducting departmental enquiries against them while a criminal trial under Section 3(a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act was pending. The criminal case (Court Case No. …
The applicant, Elegant Offset Printers Pvt. Ltd., filed a leave application to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the applicant sought transfer of the appeal to the …
The petitioner, Kum. Alwina Bashir Shaikh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and granted permission for withdrawal. …
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition in 2018 seeking the court to take cognizance of an incident for which an FIR had already been registered, requesting the registration of a counter FIR. The petition was never listed or circulated before the court for a period of eight years. The court …
The applicant, Dhananjay Vishwasrao Bhoite, filed a leave application seeking permission to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. He relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that the appeal should be …
The applicant, Sankalp Gruhtaran Sahkari Patsanstha, filed a petition seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the applicant requested that the …
The petitioner, Apparao Gopalrao Kore, filed a writ petition in 2018 seeking an order for the registration of a crime. The petition remained uncirculated and was not listed before the Court for several years. The Court noted that the petitioner had not taken any steps to advance the matter despite …
Popat Ramchandra Durge filed a writ petition (No. 222 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, which was later joined by an intervenor application filed by Mr. Kuldeep Nikam. The intervenor sought to be allowed to withdraw his appearance, and the petitioner subsequently …
The petition was filed in 2018 by Venkateshwara Group, Kala, Krida And Sanskrutik Mandal Sangli seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No steps were taken by the petitioner to advance the matter, and the petition was not listed for hearing at any time since its filing. The Court observed …
A writ petition (No. 1139 of 2018) was filed by Anilkumar Jakappa Anjutgi against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner died on 12th August 2018, as evidenced by a death certificate attached to a bailiff report dated 2nd March 2026. The respondents, represented by Mr. Tejas J. Kapre, …
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 0350 of 2024 and related criminal proceedings arising from alleged offences under Sections 3(5), 352 and 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, on the ground that the matrimonial dispute between the husband (Petitioner No.1) and his wife (Respondent No.2) had …
The State filed FIR No.3029/2016 under Section 82 of the Registration Act alleging that a Power of Attorney dated 23 September 1980, which was not registered, was used to execute sale deeds in 2010 for property belonging to Anupama Co‑operative Housing Society. The Power of Attorney was purportedly …
A criminal writ petition (No.702 of 2019) was filed by Prasad A. Sant and another against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners failed to appear before the High Court on 22 February, 23 February and 13 April 2022 despite notices. No counsel appeared on their behalf, while the State was …
The case involved a partnership firm, Surya Hospital Medical Store, alleging that Surya Hospital Pvt. Ltd. (represented by Dr. Prasad Honap) failed to pay Rs 29.20 lakh for medicines supplied between 2003‑2006 under a Central Government Scheme. A criminal complaint for cheating under Section 420 IPC …
The case involved a dispute between Surya Hospital Medical Store (a partnership firm) and Surya Hospital Pvt. Ltd. over an alleged unpaid amount of Rs 29.20 lakh for medicines supplied between 2003‑2006 under a Central Government Scheme. A criminal complaint alleging cheating under Section 420 IPC …
The applicants, Tarun Junjhunwala and Sanjay Kulkarni, sought to quash a criminal process issued against them under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the IPC, alleging that they were wrongly implicated in a cheating case filed by Patel Integrated Logistics Ltd. The complaint alleged that the …
Devidas filed Criminal Application No. 865 of 2023 against the State of Maharashtra. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dy.SP, Kalwan Division, Nashik, submitted that a C‑Summary Report had been filed before the trial court. On that basis, counsel for the applicant sought leave to withdraw the …
The petitioners, Ravi Arya and another, filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 19 October 2018 issued by the 40th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Girgaon, which had directed an investigation into allegations against an Investigation Officer. They contended that a …
A criminal application (No.1001 of 2022) was pending before the Bombay High Court. An interim application (No.4602 of 2025) was filed seeking temporary relief, presumably to stay or modify proceedings. The court examined the interim application and the prayer clause (a) therein. Finding that the …
The applicant, Punit Ramesh Patel, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. The court examined the application and found that there was no prosecution against the applicant. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for non‑prosecution. …
The petitioner, Hyder Ali Choudhary, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Hafeez of Judicare Law Associates, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the application and granted leave for withdrawal. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Sikandar Suleman Loladia, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 2219 of 2015 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, through counsel Aditya Rai, Divakar Rai and Ramchandra Rane, sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The respondent State of Maharashtra, represented by …
The petitioner, Syed Altaf Ahmed Andrabi, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was called. The respondent's counsel, Ms. Megha Bajoria, informed the court that a C‑Summary Report had been filed on 29 September …
Petitioner Rajan Dattatray Malpekar filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the proceedings of his trial. The trial concluded with the petitioner being acquitted of the charges against him. The petitioner sought relief through the writ petition despite the acquittal. …
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition challenging the investigation. The police completed their investigation and filed an A‑Summary Report on 15 July 2023, which was taken on record. The petitioner’s counsel subsequently sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the …
Dipco Estates Private Limited filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether the petitioner could be permitted to withdraw the pending writ petition. The court examined …
The petitioners, Caram Healthcare India Pvt Ltd., filed a criminal writ petition but failed to appear before the Court. The record shows that since 7 February 2017 the petitioners and/or their counsel have taken no steps to circulate the petition even once. The Court observed that the petitioners …
Divyakant Khatau filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 4871 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the application and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Accordingly, leave to …
The petitioners, Mrs. Sonali Ramdas Sasane and another, filed a criminal writ petition but failed to appear before the Court at any stage. The record shows that since 27 June 2016 the petitioners and/or their counsel took no steps to circulate the petition, and they were absent on the final date of …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash FIR No. C.R. No.7 of 2018 registered at Vishrambaug Police Station for alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471, 472 read with 34, alleging diversion of funds with K.K. Enterprises. The respondents contended that the …
The applicant, Deepak Girdharilal Matai, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Niranjan Shimpi, submitted a written request to withdraw the pending proceedings. The court recorded the request and considered whether it should grant leave to …
The petitioners Shivprasad Shamrao Bandal and others filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. Both parties jointly requested an adjournment of the proceedings. The Court, presided over by Justice Ashwin D. Bhope, granted the adjournment, setting the next hearing for 22 June 2026. …
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. I-114 of 2013 filed under IPC sections 354, 323, 504 and 34, alleging that the complaint was filed by the respondent's husband under pressure and based on misunderstandings. The respondent (Respondent No.2) filed a notarized consent affidavit stating that …
The petitioners, including Rajesh Dwarkadas Tulsiani, were named as accused in FIR C.R. No. 499 of 2020 for alleged offences under Sections 342, 347, 427, 504, 506, 201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, arising from a family property dispute. The complainant, Respondent No.2, who is the …
The applicant, Miss XYZ, filed an interim application seeking to have her name masked as "XYZ" in Criminal Writ Petition No. 3470 of 2019, where the FIR against her had been quashed. The FIR, originally filed under IPC sections 408, 409, 420, 34 and IT Act sections 66, 66B, alleged that her father …
The petitioners, Aaquib Najib Khan and Azhar Asadullah Punjabi, filed criminal writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 481 of 2022 registered under IPC sections 498(A), 406, 504, 506 and 34. The FIR stemmed from a matrimonial …
The petitioners, Anubhav Bhatter & Anr. and Asit Kumar Ghosh, filed separate criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging orders of the State of Maharashtra. The Court directed the petitioners to deposit a specified payment as a condition for further consideration. The …
The petitioner, Kiritkumar Kantilal Kantharia, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Bombay. When the matter was called for hearing, the petitioner failed to appear and indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the application. The respondent State of Maharashtra was represented by …
The petitioners, Pravin Desai & Ors., filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief. They later moved the court for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. R. V. Kini, made the application. The court, after considering the request, granted leave to …
The petitioner, Niranjan Goel (Goyal), filed a criminal writ petition in the High Court of Bombay. The petition was originally based on a settlement that had not materialized. The petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition while preserving the right to file a fresh petition on the …
The petitioner, Anand Goel (Goyal), filed a criminal writ petition alleging that the matter had been settled. Settlement negotiations subsequently failed, prompting the petitioner to seek the court's permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to re‑file on the merits of the same …
The applicants, Jinish Vinay Joshi and others, filed a criminal application seeking relief. Their counsel, Ms. Sonal V. Parab with Swati Singh on behalf of Rajeev Sawant & Associates, applied for leave to withdraw the application while requesting liberty to file discharge applications before the …
The applicant, accused in a criminal case (C.C. No.2358/PW/2023) under sections 389 and 504 of the IPC, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashal of the proceeding. The applicant and Respondent No.2 had settled their dispute, and Respondent No.2 submitted a notarised consent …
The petitioner, Nitesh Rane, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 2722 of 2023 before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, through Advocate Milan Desai, applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The respondent State of Maharashtra, represented by APP S.S. Kaushik, opposed the …
The petitioner failed to appear before the High Court on two occasions, including the hearing on 17 January 2026 and again on 23 January 2026, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the writ petition. No arguments or evidence were presented on his behalf. Consequently, the Court found that the …
The petitioner, Md Zafar Alias Ayan Shaikh, filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Ms. Ayesha Ahmed, applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, finding no impediment, granted leave to withdraw. …
Abdul Hafeez Shorabali Malik filed Writ Petition No.3222 of 2023 before the High Court of Bombay challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra. No substantive material or arguments were recorded for the petitioner. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa, …
The applicant, Sunil Ghanshyam Gupta, filed an interim application in the High Court of Bombay. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant when the matter was called. The court noted the absence of the applicant and observed that there was no prosecution of the application. …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. Their counsel, Mr. Anilkumar Patil, on their instructions, applied for unconditional withdrawal of the petition. The court considered the request and exercised its discretion to permit the withdrawal. No substantive …
The applicant, Deepak Chanbir Dahiya, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Bombay. While present in court, the applicant, through counsel, sought to withdraw the application unconditionally. The issue before the court was whether the applicant could be permitted to withdraw the …
Ashit Balwant Doshi filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashing of FIR No. 41 of 2024 registered under Sections 406, 409, 420, 34 of the IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5, 8, 13 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act. The State, through its APP, produced a communication dated 26 December 2025 …
Ashit Balwant Doshi filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashing of FIR No. 41 of 2024 registered under Sections 406, 409, 420, 34 of the IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5, 8, 13 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act. The State, through its APP, produced a communication dated 26 December 2025 …
