Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SACHIN S DESHMUKH

200 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

RAJESH SOPANRAO TANGADEversusAVINASH GANESHRAO SHINDE

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Rajesh Sopanrao Tangade filed a writ petition seeking relief against respondent Avinash Ganeshrao Shinde. The petitioner, through counsel, later indicated that an alternate efficacious remedy was available before a statutory authority. He requested the court's permission to withdraw the …

MOHAMMAD SHAFI S/O ABDUL QUADARversusSHAIKH HABIB S/O SHAIKH BASHIR and ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Mohammad Shafi filed Writ Petition No. 104 of 2003 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Shaikh Habib and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later informed the court that the petition had become infructuous and sought its withdrawal. The court considered the petitioner's request …

MAHESH RAMESH JAISWAL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants sought to quash RCC No. 1095/2024 and the process order issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalgaon, invoking the High Court's inherent powers under Section 482 of the CrPC. The case arose from a FIR filed under IPC Sections 323, 498(A), 504 read with Section 34, alleging …

AZEEM SAHEBLAL SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Sahebkha Yasinkha Pathan, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 401/2025 for offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR, lodged late, named unknown persons and no test identification parade was conducted, while co‑accused were released on bail. …

BHARAT SHIVAJI NAGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Bharat Shivaji Nagare, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. He sought leave to withdraw the application, requesting permission to re‑file after the chargesheet is filed in the concerned court. The respondent State of Maharashtra opposed the …

MOHD. NANDEEM AHMED MOMINversusM.D. M.S.E.D.C.L. COMPANY LTD. AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Mohd Nandeem Ahmed Momin filed Writ Petition No. 8145 of 2014 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against M.D. M.S.E.D.C.L. Company Ltd. and another. The petitioner was required to appear before the court on 30 July 2026 but was absent. The court recorded the petitioner's absence and noted …

KAILAS PITAMBAR KOLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Kailas Pitambar Koli, was initially appointed on compassionate grounds as a Watchman (Class‑4) in Jalgaon Municipal Corporation in 2005, despite possessing qualifications for a Class‑3 post. He repeatedly submitted representations between 2007 and 2021 requesting a revised …

VAIBHAV SHASHIKANT DHARMADHIKARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Vaibhav Dharmadhikari, was appointed on compassionate grounds as a Coolie (Class‑4) in Jalgaon Municipal Corporation in 2005, although his qualifications entitled him to a Class‑3 post. He repeatedly submitted representations in 2005, 2007, 2016, 2017 and 2018 requesting a revised …

ASARAM KUDAJI FALKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Asaram Kudadji Falke and Bramdeo Asaram Kale, filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioners sought to withdraw the petitions, citing the existence of an alternate legal remedy. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted …

BRAMHDEO ASARAM KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Asaram Kudaji Falke and Bramdeo Asaram Kale, filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The court noted that an alternate legal remedy was available to the petitioners. On their counsel's request, the petitioners were granted liberty to withdraw the writ …

KASHYAP VINOD PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Kashyap Patel was arrested in connection with Crime No.459/2025 arising from a road accident on 20 December 2025 that resulted in the death of Akhtar Rajja and injuries to others. The prosecution alleged that Patel, along with his family, was involved in the incident where a four‑wheeler collided …

JANARDHAN BAPURAO GUTTEversusTHE STATE OF MAH and ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Janardhan Bapuroo Gutte, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the pendency of the case, subsequent events occurred that rendered the relief sought by the petitioner moot. The …

DHANANJAY KASHINATH KHILLARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Dhananjay Kashinath Khillari, sought regular bail in a case involving alleged cheating, criminal breach of trust and violations of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The prosecution alleged that Khillari, as a partner, induced an informant to invest Rs.1.20 …

AZHAR AHMED SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for assaulting the informant, his family and damaging property following a dispute that had been settled. The prosecution highlighted serious injuries to the victim, while the applicants argued the incident was …

DATTATRAY PANDURANG SHETEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Dattatray Pandurang Shete, filed a bail application which was pending when the charge-sheet was filed. Counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to approach the concerned court later. The court considered the request and, without detailed …

SAMBHAJI BALAJI TIDKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered the bail application of Sambhaji Balaji Tidke, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged child marriage, sexual offences, and other crimes under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, and the Child Marriage …

SAINATH CHANDRAMANI THORATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Sainath Chandramani Thorat, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. On instructions, his counsel sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. It granted leave to withdraw the application. Consequently, …

KANTILAL AMBAJI DANGDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Kantilal Ambaji Dangde filed Writ Petition No. 807 of 2014 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Omkar Chate, argued that the petition should be dismissed as infructuous because of the lapse of …

MADHAV YASHWNT PAWARversusPANKAJ JANARDHAN SALUNKE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Madhav Yashwant Pawar filed a writ petition (WP 5514 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of Pankaj Janardan Salunke and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The court considered whether the …

VASANTABAI CHATURBHUJ SARDAversusKAVERIBAI BHAGORAO POLE and ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Vasantabai Chaturbhuj Sarda filed a writ petition (No. 2172 of 2003) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Kaveribai Bhagorao Pole and others. The petitioner sought relief, but the counsel argued that the passage of time had rendered the matters raised in the petition moot. The Court …

PRADEEP KESHAV RATHOD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Pradeep Keshav Rathod and family members, were charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in connection with the suicide of Sonali, who alleged severe physical and mental cruelty by her husband and in‑laws. The prosecution alleged that the accused had …

RAJIV YASHWANT SALVE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash FIR No. 103/2023, which alleged offences under IPC Sections 354, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34, arising from a civil dispute over agricultural land. The informant claimed the applicants assaulted her family and …

PRADUMNA PRADIP CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Pradumna s/o Pradip Chavan, was charged under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for alleged involvement in the suicide of Vaibhav. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had demanded money from Vaibhav, which purportedly led to the latter's suicide. The applicant …

BABAN ASHOK SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, accused of multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 including assault and rioting, were charged for an incident where they allegedly attacked the informant, his family and property following a dispute. The informant’s son and one of the accused had previously settled …

BABAN ASHOK SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for assault, damage to property and caste-based abuse following a dispute that escalated on 26 December 2025. The prosecution highlighted serious injuries to the informant and his family, while the applicants …

IQBAL ALI HIDAYAT ALIversusKHAIRODDIN ANWAR MUJAWAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Iqbal Ali Hidayat Ali, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the dispute had been amicably settled between the parties. Consequently, the petitioner requested …

KAILASH AMBADAS BARHATE and ANRversusCHANGDEO GANGADHAR BARHATE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 2986 of 2006) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date of 31 July 2026. The court noted the absence and, after a further adjournment, recorded that the petitioners were still not …

TUKARAM ALIAS KHOKYA LALA GAVALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Shri Tukaram @ Khokya Lala Gavali, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The Court, after hearing counsel, was not inclined to grant bail. On the applicant's instructions, counsel sought leave to withdraw the bail application, seeking liberty to …

DATTA BHAGWAT KUTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Datta s/o Bhagwat Kute, was arrested for alleged theft of stainless steel wire valued at Rs.99,000 and charged under Sections 3(5) and 303(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution's case rests primarily on the testimony of a single witness, Narayan Solanki, while the …

SUKHDEV ANANDA BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Sukhdev s/o Ananda Bhosle, was charged with multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly assaulting several persons with an axe, knife, iron bar and other weapons during a quarrel on 26 August 2025. The prosecution argued that the applicant’s use of an axe …

DHAVLIRAM BARKU CHARAWANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Dhavliram, an agriculturist, was arrested for alleged cultivation of cannabis (ganja) on his farm, with 350.585 kg of whole plants seized. He sought regular bail, claiming false implication and lack of specific evidence that the seized material constituted the flowering tops defined …

SAROJANI WIRBABU BATHULAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered bail applications filed by three women accused of offences under Section 310(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for alleged participation in a theft conspiracy at a temple crowd. The prosecution’s case relied solely on an informant’s observation of ‘suspicious’ …

LAXMAN NIVRUTTI SHINDE and ORSversusDIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MSRTC and ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, including Jeevan Nivrutti Shinde and Laxman Nivrutti Shinde, filed three writ petitions (Nos. 2528, 2530, 2536 of 2004) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Divisional Controller, MSRTC and others. The writ petitions were filed alongside related …

ARUN BALKRUSHNA SHAHUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Arun Balkrushna Shahu, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. He had earlier been arrested in connection with a criminal case and subsequently surrendered to the jail authorities. The applicant's counsel argued for his release on bail, while the …

NANDU BHAGINATH BORSEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Nandu Bhaginath Borse, filed a successive bail application without attaching the earlier order of rejection or showing any new material facts. The State opposed, noting the lack of disclosure and the principle that a later bail plea must be based on a substantial change in …

DASHRATH SONU SHINDE, LRS RAHIBAI AND OTHERSversusMALAN HARIBHAU RAUT

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners sought a direction that a mutation entry in land records be made subject to the outcome of a pending civil suit between the parties. The respondents opposed the request. The Court examined whether it could condition the mutation on the pending suit's result. It held that the mutation …

BHAGWAN MARUTI WAKALEversusNAMDEO SAKHARAM ADHAV

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Bhagwan Maruti Wakale, filed a writ petition (906 WR 3890 of 2004) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition sought relief, but the original suit underlying the petition had already been disposed of. Counsel for the petitioner argued that due to the passage of time …

SONALI ARUN GAWANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Ashwini Bharat Pund, Vice‑Chairman of M/s Bhagyalaxmi Multistate Co‑operative Credit Society, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged misappropriation of Rs 54.77 crore from depositors. The prosecution alleged that she, along with other officers, induced investors with promises of high …

PATILBA PIRAJI DABHADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Patilba Piraji Dabhade, filed a civil application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The court, after hearing the matter, found the application to be maintainable and allowed it. It directed that the writ …

SUMITRA NARHARIRAO JAGTAPversusDIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sumitra Narharirao Jagtap, filed a writ petition challenging a decision of the Divisional Commissioner. The respondent side included the Divisional Commissioner and other officials. Both parties agreed that due to the passage of time, the subject matter of the petition had become …

LAXMAN JAYWANT KOLHEversusMATHARDEV ASHRU KATE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Laxman Jaywant Kolhe filed writ petition No. 3775 of 2013 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, challenging the actions of respondents Mathardev Ashru Kate and others. The petition sought relief, but the petitioner later contended that the passage of time had rendered the …

ASHOK LAXMAN DHIRDEversusAHMEDNAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AHMEDNAGAR

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner was appointed as a temporary clerk by Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation and, after completing 180 days of continuous service, became a deemed permanent employee in July 1974 under Industrial Court Award No. 431/1969. Despite this, the corporation granted permanency benefits only from …

ANITA BABAN SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

Anita Baban Shinde filed bail applications (Nos. 439, 449, 452 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release from custody in a criminal case against the State of Maharashtra. After hearing, the court indicated it was not inclined to consider the applications. On counsel's …

BHIMRAO SAMBHAJI KADAMversusMAHADEV FAKIRA GORE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner Bhimrao filed a civil suit for declaration and injunction and later applied to amend the suit under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC to limit his claim to an equal share of water from a well. The trial court rejected the amendment, prompting a writ petition. The petitioner argued that the …

SHIVAJI PRABHU JAGTAP AND OTHERSversusTHE STATA OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 4120 of 2014 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition, citing the availability of an alternate …

SONABAI VISHWANATH SONAWANEversusPANCHFULA SOPAN SURALKAR

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sonabai Vishwanath Sonawane, filed a writ petition (No. 4581 of 2003) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the civil suit underlying the petition had already been disposed of. The Court examined whether any relief could still be …

JAYSHREE MAROTI HAKEversusSHANTABAI DNYANOBA HAKE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Jayshree Maroti Hake filed a writ petition (No. 8567 of 2015) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Shantabai Dnyanoba Hake and others. The petition remained pending for an extended period, spanning over a decade. Respondent No.1, through counsel Mr. Shailendra S. Gangakhedkar, argued …

ANIL DHANRAJ JAINversusMAHENDRA SOMNATH SHIMPI (BAGUL) AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed two writ petitions (Nos. 6076 and 6088 of 2014) challenging actions of the respondents. The petitioners' counsel failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date of 24 July 2026. The court recorded the absence of counsel and, after giving the petitioners an opportunity …

VISHAL ASHOK GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered bail applications filed by three accused in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act where 32.485 kg of cannabis material, including all parts of the plant, was seized. The prosecution argued that the quantity exceeded the commercial threshold …

KESHAVRAO PATILBA DAPKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Keshavrao s/o Patilba Dapke, filed a writ petition (No. 4975 of 2015) along with a civil application (No. 858 of 2022) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court initially granted leave to amend the petition, directing the amendment to be filed within four weeks. …

OMKAR KALURAM SASANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Omkar Kaluram Sasane, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant's counsel, on instructions, moved the court seeking withdrawal of the bail application. The court considered the request and found no objection to the withdrawal. Consequently, …

TANAJI SADHU SHENDGEversusBHAUSAHEB MARUTI RAUT AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Tanaji Sadhu Shendge, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the case, the parties reached a settlement. The petitioner’s counsel, Ms. Vaibhavi S. Sarode, on behalf of Mr. Chapalgaonkar Shailesh S., sought to withdraw the …

SANDEEP PANDURANG GAJAREversusSHEELA @ JYOTI SANDEEP GAJARE

DISPOSED OFF

Sandeep Pandurang Gajare filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Sheela @ Jyoti Sandeep Gajare. The petition was listed for hearing on 12 June 2026, but the petitioner failed to appear. The Court adjourned the matter to 10 July 2026, giving the …

UMASHANKAR PADMANABH SHETTIGARversusM/S GOODYEAR SOUTH ASIA TYRES PVT LTD.

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Umashankar Padmanabh Shettigar, filed Writ Petition No. 5506 of 2006 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging M/s Goodyear South Asia Tyres Pvt Ltd. The petition was listed for hearing on 13 July 2026, but the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent. The court …

KESHAVRAO PATILBA DAPKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Keshavrao s/o Patilba Dapke, filed a writ petition (No. 4975 of 2015) along with a civil application (No. 858 of 2022) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The Court initially granted leave to amend the petition, directing that any amendment be filed within four weeks. On …

IRRANNA MALIKARJUN CHINCHOREversusHIRABAI SIDHRAM CHINCHOLE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Iranna Malikarjun Chinchore filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of Hirabai Sidhram Chinchole and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that a judgment in a related appeal rendered the writ petition infructuous. The Court considered whether the …

UMESH KAMAJI GHATIand ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAH and ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No.6108 of 2005 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners later sought leave of the court to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, applied for …

KESHAV AMBADAS YAKHANDEversusSUSHIL RAMPAL BALDAVA

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a matter that was already pending in a suit. The respondent argued that the suit had been disposed of, leaving no issue for the writ petition. The court examined whether the petition retained any relevance after the suit's disposal. Finding that the …

RAMA PANDURANG SARTAPEversusPANDURANG KISHANRAO SARTAPE

DISPOSED OFF

A writ petition (No. 6512 of 2015) was filed by Rama Pandurang Sartape against Pandurang Kishanrao Sartape. The petition was examined by the High Court at Aurangabad. The Court observed that the parties were ad idem, meaning there was no substantive dispute between them. Consequently, the Court held …

ROHIT DYANESHWAR KUKDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, a student, was implicated in a fatal shooting case under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Indian Arms Act, based on an FIR that named unknown assailants. The prosecution alleged the applicant procured the weapon and highlighted his role in lodging a related FIR, claiming …

MAHADU SAKRUJI RAUTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Mahadu Sakruji Raut, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petition could be disposed of as infructuous due to subsequent developments. The court accepted this submission. …

LAXMAN ALIAS LUCKY BALAJI MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Laxman More, was charged with murder, conspiracy, and offences under the Arms Act and the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crimes Act for allegedly shooting Devidas, the brother of a complainant, with a pistol. The prosecution presented a prima facie case showing the applicant's use …

VISHNU PRATAP PATILversusTHE RETURNIN OFFICER AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Vishnu, son of Pratap Patil, filed a writ petition (No. 6862 of 2015) in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the election of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee in Latur. The respondents were the Returning Officer for that election and other officials. The petitioner’s counsel …

KANTABAI SHIVAJI GADAKHversusJAGANNATH BHIKA GADAKH AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Kantabai Shivaji Gadakh, filed a suit seeking a perpetual injunction against the respondents for alleged encroachment of ancestral land. The respondents filed a counter‑claim for ownership of a portion of the land and later sought to amend their written statement and counter‑claim. …

MARKHELKAR SAMDANI ABDUL WAHEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, former primary teachers appointed to Scheduled‑Tribe reserved posts, retired on 30‑06‑2024 and were denied pension because the Zilla Parishads insisted on a fresh Tribe Validity Certificate. The petitioners relied on a 17‑Nov‑2014 order in Writ Petition No. 2716/2014 which protected …

BAIG NAWAB SAHEBJANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, former primary teachers appointed under a Scheduled Tribe reservation, were protected by a 2014 High Court order that waived any future reservation benefits but barred adverse action for lack of a Tribe Validity Certificate. After retiring in June 2024, the Zilla Parishads refused …

SHAIKH MAZHAR HAJI SHAIKH ISMAILversusMADHAVRAO BAPURAO RANDIVE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Shaikh Mazhar Haji Shaikh Ismail, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The court considered whether the petition could still be entertained despite …

SANGITA W/O GAUTAM CHOUTHMALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sangita, filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge that refused to frame an additional charge of murder (Section 302 IPC) against the accused, Ritesh, in a case where her husband died from injuries after being struck with a brick. The …

DILIP VIJAYKUMAR GOREversusTHE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Dilip Vijaykumar Gore, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the actions of the Additional Collector, Ahmednagar and others. The Additional Collector, through the learned Additional Government Pleader, contended that the petition was not …

MUDRIKABAI PANDHARINATH KENDREversusRAMAKANT SHRIPADRAO KULKARNI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner Mudrikabai challenged a trial court order rejecting her application to amend her written statement after the plaintiffs were allowed to amend their plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC. The plaintiffs had been permitted to correct the description of the suit property, and the …

RAMESH UTTAM RATHODversusUDDHAV MANOHAR PATOLE AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Ramesh Uttam Rathod filed a writ petition (No. 4306 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of Uddev Manohar Patole and another. The petition sought relief concerning a matter that was also the subject of a civil suit. During the pendency of the writ petition, …

SUNIL RANGNATH LOKHANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Sunil Rangnath Lokhande filed a writ petition (906 WRIT PETITION NO. 8966 OF 2015) against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. Respondent No.7, represented by counsel Mr. Anandsing Bayas, contended that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The Court examined the …

KACHRU SHANKAR SHINDEversusRADHABAI TUKARAM SHINDE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 8007 of 2011 before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. On 16 July 2026 the petitioner failed to appear before the court. The court recorded the petitioner's absence and noted that the petition had been posted for dismissal. Consequently, the writ …

BHIMRAO POPAT PATIL AND ANOTHERversusBAPU POPAT PATIL (SHISODE) AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a suit. The suit was subsequently disposed of, and the petitioners' counsel submitted that no relief remained to be claimed. The court accepted this submission and held that the petition was infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed. …

SHAFIQ OSMAN PATELversusMAHAVIR JUGRAJ ABBAD

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Shafiq s/o Osman Patel, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Both parties later agreed that the passage of time had rendered the petition ineffective. Consequently, the court found the petition to be infructuous. No substantive legal arguments were …

PRADEEP MOTILAL KULTHE AND ANOTHERversusMANISH SHESHMAL BHANDARI

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition (24 WRIT PETITION NO. 3211 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Both parties agreed that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered whether any further hearing was required. Since the parties were ad idem, the court found no …

GOVIND SURESH DHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Govind Suresh Dhavan, sought regular bail in a murder case (IPC Sections 302 and 506) for the killing of a woman who had rejected his marriage proposal. The prosecution presented a strong prima facie case, including eyewitness testimony, a recovered knife, forensic blood‑group …

KADUBAI NIVRUTI AALATversusASHA SANDIPAN AALAT AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Kadubai filed Writ Petition No. 9464 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against respondents Asha and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that, due to the passage of time, the petition had become infructuous. The court considered the submission that the …

SHANKAR SHRIDHAR RAUT AND ANOTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioners submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The Court examined the …

AKHIL SURESH GUPTAversusTHE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Akhil Suresh Gupta, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the actions of the Divisional Commissioner and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rahul I. Dusuriya, on behalf of the petitioner, moved the court seeking to withdraw the petition. …

ANIKET VISHNU MUNDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Aniket Vishnu Munde, sought regular bail for murder charges under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from the death of Balu, the informant's son, at a hospital owned by Dr. Pramod. The prosecution alleged that Munde, a nephew of Dr. Pramod, …

SACHIN LAHU CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Sachin Lahu Chavan, filed an application under Section 483 of the BNSS seeking relaxation of a bail condition that barred him from entering the village of Poi Tanda until trial concluded. The original bail order dated 26‑03‑2024 imposed this restriction. Counsel argued that the …

VIMALBAI LAXMAN PATILversusLAXMAN SHENPADU PATIL

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Vimalbai, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The respondent, Laxman, objected to the maintainability of the petition. In response, the petitioner sought leave from the Court to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to initiate …

JITENDRA RAMLINGAPPA AMBEKARversusARUNA JITENDRA AMBEKAR

DISPOSED OFF

Jitendra filed a writ petition against his wife Aruna. During the pendency of the petition, the related civil suit (H.M.P. No.70/2014) before the Civil Court, Nanded was fully disposed. The respondent’s counsel placed the civil court’s judgment on record. The High Court observed that with the …

RAHUL DEVIDAS KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant Rahul s/o Devidas Kale filed a bail application in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The court noted that the trial had substantially progressed, with only two witnesses remaining to be examined, as per the report from the District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, …

KETAN LAHU PHAPALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Ketan Lahu Phapale filed a bail application (No. 1729 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court indicated it was not inclined to grant bail, after which the applicant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the application. The court granted the leave, resulting in the bail …

LAHU GITARAM PHAPALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Lahu Gitaram Phapale, was charged with multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from an alleged assault and robbery of an informant on 23.12.2024. The applicant contended that the FIR was the result of an old dispute and that the injuries mentioned in the FIR …

SYED ALI SYED IBRAHIMversusTAHSILDAR SILLOD, AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, represented by Ms. Fatema Kazi and Mr. S.S. Kazi, filed a writ petition (No. 4281 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Tahsildar, Sillod and others. During the proceedings, the petitioners applied for leave to withdraw the petition, …

SHAIKH ASLAM SHAIKH KHUSHALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Shaikh Aslam Shaikh Khushal, filed a bail application before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. After hearing, the court indicated it was not inclined to grant bail. The applicant's counsel then sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The court granted the leave, …

KALPANA ALIAS CHANDRAKALA KONDIBA SHEVTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Kalpana alias Chandrakala Kondiba Shevte, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The court, after hearing counsel, indicated it was not inclined to grant bail. Counsel for the petitioner then sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The …

BALAI RAMCHANDRA PATNE AND ANOTHERSversusRAOSAHEB BABARAO HINGOLE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 10886 of 2015 in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was presented before Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh. On the petitioners' instructions, counsel Mr. G. N. Chincholkar submitted a written request to withdraw the petition. The court recorded …

SURAJ ALIAS MAULI ANANDRAO BAPTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Suraj alias Mauli Anandrao Bapte, was charged with murder and criminal conspiracy under Sections 302, 120(b) read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the death of Manohar Vilas Punde. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with co‑accused, assaulted the deceased on 27 …

NAJEM SHAH MOHAMMAD SHAHA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicants, Najem Shah Mohammad Shaha and another, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing the counsel, the court indicated it was not inclined to entertain the bail plea. The applicants then sought the court's permission to withdraw their bail …

ISHWAR TUKARAM BRAMHANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Ishwar Tukaram Bramhan, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant's counsel, on instructions, moved the court to withdraw the bail application. The respondent State of Maharashtra was represented by counsel A. R. Kale. The court considered …

KALAWATI SATLING MAHTREversusANANT RAMESH SAKHARE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Principal District Judge in a civil appeal (Regular Civil Appeal No.197 of 2014). The petition sought to raise an exception to that order. However, the civil appeal was subsequently decided by a judgment dated 08 February 2016, thereby …

SANTOSH DAGDU MHASEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Santosh Dagdu Mhase filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The petitioner later discovered an alternative remedy before an appellate authority and applied to withdraw the petition, requesting that the interim order already granted be continued for four …

NANA KASHINATH KULKARNI AND OTHERSversusKAILAS NANA KULKARNI AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 10028 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. On 13 July 2026, the petition was listed for hearing but the petitioners' counsel was absent. The court noted the continued non-appearance of the petitioners' …

VITTHAL ALIAS MAULI TUKARAM PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Vitthal alias Mauli Tukaram Patil, filed a successive bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor argued that the applicant had not disclosed any prior bail applications and that a subsequent bail plea must be based on a …

NITIN BAPURAO MOHITEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered bail applications filed by Nitin Bapurao Mohite and Radhesham Panjabrao Bhalerao, accused in a kidnapping‑ransom case registered as Crime No.597 of 2024. The prosecution alleged that the accused were part of a gang that abducted an elderly man and demanded a Rs 1 crore …

RADHESHAM PANJABRAO BHALERAOversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench considered bail applications filed by Nitin Bapurao Mohite and Radhesham Panjabrao Bhalerao, accused in a kidnapping‑ransom case registered as Crime No.597 of 2024. The prosecution alleged that the accused were part of a gang that abducted an elderly man …

AVINASH ALIAS BATLYA SAHEBRAO INGOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Avinash alias Batlya Sahebrao Ingole, aged 23, was arrested on 16‑12‑2021 in connection with a murder and related offences under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148, 149 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. After more than four years of pre‑trial detention, he applied for regular bail, claiming …

MADHAV DIGAMBAR SHINDEversusRAMESH KASHINATH DHANURE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a matter that was already pending in a suit. The petitioner’s counsel argued that, since the suit had been disposed, there was nothing left to be adjudicated in the petition. The court examined whether the petition remained maintainable in light of …

ASHOK RAOSAHEB WANVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Ashok Raosaheb Wanve filed a writ petition (No. 314 of 2014) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The Attorney General for the State argued that, due to the passage of time, the matters raised in the petition had become …

SANTOSH ARUNRAO SURVASEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Santosh Arunrao Survase, a tax officer, sought regular bail in a case involving alleged cheating, forgery and violations of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, induced depositors to invest in a cooperative …

RAHUL APPA KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Rahul Appa Kale, sought regular bail for offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including murder, arising from a violent assault on 5 January 2025 that resulted in the death of Sunil Kale. The prosecution alleged that Kale, armed with a sickle, participated in a coordinated …

TAPESH KIRAN BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Tapesh Kiran Bhosale, was charged under Sections 309(6), 311, 115(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for a robbery and assault alleged to have occurred on 16 September 2025. The FIR described four masked assailants who stole ornaments and a two-wheeler, but the …

KARAMSING GYANSING PAWARAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Karamsing Gyansing Pawara was arrested after a police raid uncovered 360 kg of ganja at his residence, leading to charges under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The applicant sought regular bail, arguing lack of prima facie evidence …

INDRAJEET MOHANLAL PANWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Indrajeet Mohanlal Panwar filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant's counsel, on his instructions, moved the court seeking withdrawal of the bail application. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by counsel. The court considered the …

NIHAL RAMBHAU GANGNEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Nihal Rambhau Gangne, was arrested after a police raid recovered approximately 12.186 kg of cannabis material comprising seeds, tops, stems and flowers. He sought regular bail, contending that the seized substance did not meet the definition of "ganja" under Section 2(b) of the NDPS …

SAIL PANDURANG BANSODEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Two bail applications were filed in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, by Sail Pandurang Bansode and Anwar Shaha Mohammad Shaha against the State of Maharashtra. The court, after hearing at length, indicated it was not inclined to entertain the applications. On the court's indication, the …

NIRAJ TIRTHKUMAR NAVLANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Niraj Tirthkumar Navlani, was arrested for alleged fraud involving a WhatsApp group, RTGS deposits and loss of funds, charged under Section 420 of the IPC and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. He contended that the investigation was complete, no property was …

ANWAR SHAHA MOHAMMAD SHAHAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two bail applications filed by Sail Pandurang Bansode and Anwar Shaha Mohammad Shaha against the State of Maharashtra. The court, after detailed hearing, expressed that it was not inclined to grant bail to either applicant. On the instructions of the …

PRASAD ANIL CHANGULPAYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Prasad Anil Changulpay, was charged with kidnapping and penetrative sexual assault of a 17‑year‑old girl under Sections 137(2), 64(2), 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 8, 12 of the POCSO Act. The victim initially went missing, filed a complaint of kidnapping, …

KALUSINGH TERSINGH PAWARAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Kalusingh Tersingh Pawara, was arrested after police seized 31.120 kg of half‑dried leaves, seeds and branches from a vehicle during a raid, alleging violation of Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii) and 20(b) of the NDPS Act. The defence argued that the seized material may not constitute "ganja" …

ROHIT MAHENDRA VALVI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The petitioners Rohit Mahendra Valvi and another filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release from custody. The learned counsel for the applicants argued at length, but the court indicated it was not inclined to grant bail. On the court's indication, the …

OMPRAKASHJI RATANLALJI MALPANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Omprakashji Ratanlalji Malpani filed a writ petition (No. 12223 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The court examined whether the …

GANESH MURLIDHAR SONAWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Ganesh Murlidhar Sonawane was charged under Sections 109, 118(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly assaulting a minor with an iron rod. The prosecution alleged the act was pre‑meditated and caused serious injuries requiring hospitalization. The applicant contended …

SAHIL VIJAS GUNJALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Sahil, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release from custody. During the proceedings, the applicant, through counsel, requested to withdraw the bail application. The issue before the court was whether the applicant could be permitted to …

ANURADHA TANAJI BHARADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anuradha Tanaji Bharade, the wife of a deceased man who had allegedly sent a video accusing her of illicit relations, leading to his suicide. The FIR under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, was based largely on suspicion …

PAWAN JITENDRA GHUNDIYALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Pawan Jitendra Ghundiyal, filed two applications seeking cancellation of bail orders No. 4 of 2023 and No. 2 of 2023 issued by the High Court. The issue before the court was whether the bail orders should be set aside. The applicant, through counsel, later instructed that both …

VINOD RAJARAM DAMALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, considered a bail application filed by Vinod Rajaram Damale, accused of abetting the forcible sexual assault of a 12‑year‑old girl under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant physically lifted the …

KARTARSINGH HATYARSINGH TAKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Kartarsingh Hatyarsingh Tak, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 321/2025 for alleged offences under Section 310(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act after police seized a vehicle containing weapons and identified him as a passenger. The …

PRAVIN PRALHAD JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Pravin Pralhad Jadhav, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release from custody pending trial. The Court, after hearing counsel, indicated it was not inclined to entertain the bail application. Counsel for the applicant then requested …

SUNIL UTTAM DHEREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Sunil Uttam Dhere was charged under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for allegedly abducting and attempting to force a marriage with a 17‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the …

NISAR BEG AJIJ BEGversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Nisar Beg Ajij Beg, was charged under IPC sections 420, 504 and 506 read with 34. He initially obtained anticipatory bail by promising to deposit Rs 12 lakh, but failed to do so, leading the High Court to reject the anticipatory bail. He later misrepresented the status of that bail to …

PANDURANG SHIVAJI DODTALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

Pandurang applied for bail before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court, after hearing counsel, was not inclined to grant bail. Counsel for the applicant then sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The court granted the leave, and the bail application was disposed of as …

AKSHAY SANTOSH SHINGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Akshay Santosh Shingare, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. On instructions, his counsel sought to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail application before the trial court after the charge-sheet is filed. The …

BANDU ALIAS JAYSINGH SHRIMANT WAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Bandu alias Jaysingh Shrimant Ware, sought regular bail for offences under Sections 64(2)(i) and 64(2)(k) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 92 of the Right of Persons with Disabilities Act, arising from an alleged forced sexual intercourse on a speech‑ and …

AVINASH SHAMLAL GUPTAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Avinash Shamlal Gupta, filed a successive bail application in a murder case where he faces life imprisonment or up to ten years' rigorous imprisonment. He sought bail on the ground of trial delay but offered no new material facts or change in circumstances since the earlier …

YUSUF AKABAR TADVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Yusuf Akabar Tadvi was arrested for allegedly cultivating cannabis plants on his farm, with police seizing 167.53 kg of whole plants. The prosecution charged him under sections 20(b)(ii)(C) and 8(b) of the NDPS Act, asserting a commercial quantity of 'ganja'. The defence argued that the seizure …

RAJKUMAR UDDHAV GATCHERALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Rajkumar, sought regular bail in a case involving murder, conspiracy, and other offences under the IPC and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act. The prosecution alleged that Rajkumar, along with his brother and another accused, received a contract to murder Sachin in …

AKSHAY SANJAY HAKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, accused of murder and related offences under the IPC, Arms Act and the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOC), sought regular bail after being in custody for over five years. The prosecution alleged that the accused participated in an armed unlawful assembly that murdered …

RAMESHWAR PUNDLIK CHORMALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Rameshwar Pundlik ChorMale, had filed a bail application in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. After the charge-sheet was filed by the prosecution, the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the bail application, requesting permission to present a fresh bail application …

HARSHDEEP GULABRAO TATKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Harshdeep Gulabrao Tatke, was arrested in connection with a suicide case under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging abetment of suicide of Roshni, a nursing student. The prosecution claimed the applicant demanded money and harassed the deceased, while the defence …

SAURABH TARACHAND GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Saurabh Tarachand Gaikwad, was arrested on 17 August 2025 in connection with a case alleging child marriage, sexual offences, and the suicide of his wife, who was reportedly a minor at the time of marriage. The prosecution alleged that Gaikwad married the 13‑year‑old victim, demanded …

KAILASH PANDIT CHAVHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Kailash Pandit Chavhan, was charged under Sections 65(2), 351(2), 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 5(m), 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act for allegedly sexually assaulting a 10‑year‑old girl. The prosecution narrated that the victim …

KACHRU SHAMRAO SURASEversusDNYANESHWAR GANPAT UBALE

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Kachru Shamrao Surase, sought to have his name removed from a writ petition on 17 December 2024. He later filed a civil application requesting that the order deleting his name be recalled. The High Court examined the averments in the application and found that no plausible or …

HEMANT ALIAS VICKKY ISHWAR CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Hemant @ Vickky Ishwar Chaudhari, sought bail in a case involving alleged unlawful assembly, intimidation, extortion, and assault under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that a group of accused, led by Accused No.1, attacked the …

SHAIKH ZAKIR SHAIKH RASHIDversusNISAR BEG AJIJ BEG MIRZA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Nisar Beg Ajij Beg, was charged under IPC sections 420, 504 and 506 read with 34. He initially obtained anticipatory bail by promising to deposit Rs.12 lakh, but failed to do so, leading the High Court to reject the anticipatory bail. Subsequently, the trial court, misled by the …

AMBADAS RAJARAM TALANKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Ambadas Rajaram Talankar filed a review application challenging the High Court's order dated 13 June 2025 in his writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The court examined the scope of review jurisdiction, emphasizing that it is limited to correcting apparent errors of law that cause …

SANTOSH ALIAS BANTI SANDU SALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Santosh Alias Banti Sandu Salve filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release from custody in a criminal case against the State of Maharashtra. The court, after hearing counsel, indicated it was not inclined to grant bail. On the instructions of the …

NAVNATH GOARKSHNATH BHAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Navnath Goarkshnath Bhawar, was charged under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged sexual assault on 08‑08‑2025. The prosecution alleged that the applicant forcibly assaulted the complainant, while the applicant claimed the incident was a false implication …

SHADAB JAVED SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered the bail application of Shadab Javed Shaikh, arrested for offences under Sections 3, 7, 9, 25(8) and 29 of the Arms Act after a raid recovered a country‑made revolver and live cartridges. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the statement of a juvenile co‑accused and the …

KANCHAN ALIAS KALPESH SHRIMANT SALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Kanchan Alias Kalpesh Shrimant Salve, sought regular bail for offences under sections 55 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from Crime No. 377/2025 registered at Gondi Police Station, Jalna. The FIR was lodged against unknown persons and the applicant’s name does …

AKASH RAGHUNATH SHERKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Akash Raghunath Sherkar, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After filing, the applicant, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the bail application. The sole issue before the Court was whether the applicant could be allowed to …

PRAVIN CHAMPALAL VAISHNAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Pravin Champalal Vaishnav, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After the charge‑sheet was filed, the applicant’s counsel sought to withdraw the bail application. The court considered whether the application could be withdrawn post charge‑sheet. No …

SHIVKANTA BALAJI BANDGARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Arun alias Ranjit Gopalrao Khandekar, filed a bail application (BA-2571/2025) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After the charge-sheet was filed, his counsel sought to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to approach the appropriate court. The Court, after …