Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
87 judgments · newest first · showing 1–87
Ajab Singh filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. While the appeal was pending, the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bulandshahr reported that the appellant had died. The court received the report on 25 August 2025 and, on 1 October 2026, held that the death of the sole appellant …
The appellant, Mangal Khan, filed a criminal appeal (No. 2125 of 1987) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a conviction. During the pendency of the appeal, the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Shahjahanpur reported on 27 August 2026 that the appellant had died. The court considered whether the …
The appellants Rais Pal and Sadhu Ram were convicted for murder and attempt to murder under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The prosecution relied on the consistent ocular testimony of three eyewitnesses, including an injured witness, and medical evidence that corroborated the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 09-11-2025 registered under Sections 319(2) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of …
The petitioners, Akram and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 02‑09‑2026 registered under sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima facie …
The petitioner, Sangeeta, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing police officials to conduct a fair investigation and arrest accused persons in a criminal case under various sections of the B.N.S. and D.P. Act. She relied on the Supreme Court’s observations in Sakiri Vasu v. State of …
Sudhir Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 14‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The Allahabad High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of …
Petitioner Mohit Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 07.07.2026 that alleged offences under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on …
The petitioner Veerpal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 02‑09‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 191(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie case of …
Chandani Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing police officials (respondents No.2 and 3) to conduct a prompt, proper and fair investigation in Crime No.120 of 2026 under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. and to complete it within the period prescribed by law. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 22 July 2026 that alleged offences under sections 329(3), 324(4), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State of …
Dr. Piyush filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a proper investigation in Crime No. 284 of 2026 under sections of the B.N.S. that correspond to IPC sections 420 and 120‑B. The Court examined the scope of Section 156(3) of the Criminal …
The petitioners challenged the registration of an FIR dated 02‑08‑2026 under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 109 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 & 4 of the D.P. Act, seeking its quash. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it prima facie disclosed the commission of offences, rendering the prayer to …
Petitioners Deepak Kumar and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 01.08.2026 registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court examined the FIR, …
Petitioners Hemant and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04‑09‑2026 registered under Sections 318(4) and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, …
Petitioners Sanjeev Kumar Gupta and another filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 12‑09‑2026 lodged in Crime No. 0610 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 506 and 387 IPC (criminal intimidation and attempt to murder). The Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima …
The petitioners, Ayub Khan and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 19‑08‑2026 (Case Crime No.176 of 2026) registered under sections 191(2), 78(2), 131 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it …
The petition filed by Shivam Prajapati sought quashing of an FIR dated 02‑09‑2026 registered under Sections 281 and 106(1) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer for quash …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 22.08.2026, registered under Section 74 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.) and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 09.07.2026 under Sections 351(3) and 316(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer to quash untenable. Relying on …
The appellant Chhotu Verma was convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC based largely on circumstantial evidence, including an alleged illicit relationship and motive, the recovery of an axe, and the presence of the victim's body in the house. The trial court relied on hostile statements from …
The petitioners filed a review application seeking reconsideration of the High Court's order dated 10‑08‑2021 dismissing their writ petition. The review was filed 811 days after the original order, and the petitioners submitted an affidavit attempting to explain the delay, citing lack of telephone …
Petitioners Saiz Chand and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04-12-2025 that alleged offences under sections 351(3), 318(4), 352 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and section 66(D) of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000. The High …
Shravan Kumar Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police (respondent No.4) to conduct a fair investigation and submit a report under an FIR dated 19‑06‑2026. The petitioner relied on Section 137(2) of the B.N.S. and cited Supreme Court …
The petitioners, Khushi and another, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 under Section 137(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) alleging cognizable offences. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State of Telangana v. Habib …
The petitioners, Dharmendra Yadav and six others, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 8‑8‑2026 registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed …
Petitioners Ashraf Khan Chaudhary and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 17 July 2026, registered under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Mirzapur Police Station, Saharanpur. They contended that the FIR does …
The petitioners, Shahid Fakeer and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the registration of an FIR dated 29 July 2026, which alleged offences under several sections of the BNS. The FIR pertained to a cognizable offence recorded at …
Petitioners Pappu and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 20‑08‑2026 under Sections 115(2), 191(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima facie commission of offence, …
Petitioners Sitaram Maurya and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04.08.2026 under Section 305(a) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08.07.2026 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) alleging abduction of a minor. The alleged abductee was later recovered and, in a statement under Section 180 BNS, said she had voluntarily left her …
Petitioners Sandeep and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 09‑07‑2026 in Crime No.165, which alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The High Court …
Petitioners challenged the FIR dated 17-08-2026 in Crime No.227, which alleged offences under Sections 75, 191(2), 333, 115(2), 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The High Court examined the FIR and, finding a prima facie case of commission of …
The petitioner, Dilshad Qurashi @ Mallu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash a notice dated 20‑07‑2026 issued by the District Magistrate, Mau under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gunda Act, and a writ of mandamus to restrain any coercive action. The …
The petitioners, Om Narayan and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 18‑08‑2026 registered under sections 115(2), 191(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima facie …
Petitioners Zaid and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 17.05.2026, registered under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima facie commission of offence, citing Supreme Court precedents …
Petitioners Kasim Malik and eight others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 22‑07‑2026 in Crime No.0208 of 2026, which alleged offences under various sections of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the D.P. Act. The Court examined the FIR and held that …
Mahendra Singh Tyagi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police officers (Respondents No. 2 and 3) to conduct a fair investigation into Crime No. 307 of 2023 under various IPC sections. The petitioner argued that the investigation was unsatisfactory and that the High Court could …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 20.08.2026 that alleged violations of Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it prima facie disclosed the commission of an offence, citing Supreme Court precedents that …
Petitioner Jeeshan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 30 July 2026 registered under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State of Telangana v. Habib Abdullah …
Petitioners Ismail and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 30.07.2026 registered under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State of Telangana v. …
The petitioner, Kamran Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 16 July 2026 under Section 316(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) registered at Police Station Fareedpur, Bareilly. He contended that he was not responsible for the loss of certain records and …
The petitioner, Vindhyachal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to investigate Crime No. 176 of 2026 without collusion and to conduct a fair, impartial investigation under several sections of the B.N.S. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s observations in Sakiri Vasu …
Manoj filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an order dated 25‑01‑2021 passed by the District Magistrate of Farrukhabad under Section 14(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The petitioner did not raise any objection to the order …
The petitioners challenged the FIR dated 07-08-2026 filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, seeking its quash. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed prima facie cognizable offences, making the petition untenable. …
Petitioners Rohit and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 registered under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, …
The petitioners challenged the FIR dated 18.08.2026 registered under Section 85 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, arguing that the FIR did not disclose any cause of action and merely reflected a grievance about a pending application. The court examined the FIR and …
Avinash Sirohi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair investigation into an FIR dated 12‑04‑2026. The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s observations in Sakiri Vasu regarding the magistrate’s power under Section 156(3) of the CrPC to order further …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 19.08.2026 under Section 316(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer to quash untenable in line with …
Nagina Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑08‑2026 that registered a case under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12 of the Passport Act. The petition sought quashing of the FIR on the ground that it did not disclose a cognizable …
Petitioners Lal Chand and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 19 July 2026 that alleged offences under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 12‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 333, 76 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie case of …
Dr. Prabhat Kumar Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of crime No. 172 of 2026 under sections 352, 351(3), 318(4) of the BNSS. The petition relied on Supreme Court observations …
The petitioner Sanjay Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 3 April 2025 that alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of …
The petitioners, Smt. Neeraj and five others, filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 17 July 2026 (Crime No.270 of 2026) that alleged offences under sections 333, 76, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on …
In Criminal Appeal No. 1211 of 1988, the appellants Harish Chandra and others challenged a conviction. The High Court initially abated the appeal with respect to appellants 1, 2 and 4 and ordered a non‑bailable warrant against appellant 3, Mam Chandra @ Toti. Subsequently, the Chief Judicial …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 09-07-2026 that alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 127(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and provisions of the D.P. Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act. The High Court …
The petitioner, Akshay Kushwaha, filed a writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR dated 19 July 2026 under Sections 317(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The High Court …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under multiple sections of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. They contended that the dispute was civil in nature and that no offence was made out, seeking quash of the FIR. The respondents …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 8 July 2026, registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 352 and 127(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and found that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer …
Petitioners Ravi @ Ravikant and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 16‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 353(3), 74, 85, 89 B.N.S. and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contended that the FIR was false, malicious …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 14 July 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 356, 117(2), 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer …
The petitioner, Shivam Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 18 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. The petitioner contended that the FIR was filed …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 01.08.2026 that alleged offences under sections 329(1), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie case of commission of …
The petitioner, Arvind Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 10‑08‑2026 registered under Sections 318(4) and 62 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 25‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) and 329(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State …
The petitioner, Mahendra Chaudhary, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 27 July 2026 that alleged offences under Sections 69, 77 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, the alleged relationship with the informant was consensual, and the FIR …
The petitioners, Dr. Vijay Kumar Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash the FIR dated 17 July 2026 that registered a case under Section 304-A IPC for an alleged offence in Robertsganj, Sonbhadra. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a …
The petitioner, Vipin Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 3 July 2026 registered under multiple IPC offences (Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506) at Kalan Police Station, Shahjahanpur. He contended that the dispute was civil in nature and that no …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 24‑05‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 333 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie …
Petitioner Atul Yadav filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 27 June 2026 in Crime No.133, which alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 353 and 74 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 19‑06‑2026 under Sections 137(2) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S). The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer …
The appellant Udham Singh filed a criminal appeal challenging his conviction. Counsel for the appellant and respondent presented their arguments before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court examined the record to determine whether any legal or factual error warranted setting aside …
Raghunath Alias Batauli filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court challenging the decision of the lower court. The appeal was heard by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Salil Kumar Rai and Hon'ble Justice Dr. Ajay Kumar-II. After consideration, the court found no merit in the …
The appellant Ranjeet filed Criminal Appeal No. 2195 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the decision of the lower court. The Court considered the record and, referring to the order in the connected Criminal Appeal No. 1978 of 2011 (Krishan Pal @ Lala & Anr. v. State of U.P.), …
Petitioner Mohd Afzal challenged the attachment of his property by orders dated 17.02.2026 and 17.06.2023 issued by the District Magistrate under Section 14 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, contending that the property was purchased from his own income and …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad heard Criminal Appeal No. 1821 of 2011 filed by Bahadur against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The appeal was dismissed by a bench comprising Hon’ble Justice Salil Kumar Rai and Hon’ble Justice Dr. Ajay Kumar‑II. The court directed that the orders be as per the …
The High Court examined five connected criminal appeals arising from a 2008 trial in which six accused were convicted of murder and related offences for the killing of Pushpraj. The prosecution relied on the testimony of two injured eyewitnesses, Manoj Kumar and his sister‑in‑law Vimla Devi, who …
The appellant, Titu, appealed under Section 413 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the acquittal of accused Nos. 2‑4 in a case involving alleged abusive language and an altercation with the victim. The trial court had acquitted these accused, while the deceased accused Vikas @ Ulla was alleged …
The appellant challenged the acquittal of the husband and in‑laws of Sanju Verma in a dowry‑death case. The prosecution alleged that the accused harassed the deceased for dowry and caused her death by poisoning, invoking Sections 302/34, 304B, 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The State of Uttar Pradesh filed Government Appeal Defective No. 122 of 2026 against Manoj Singh and others before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The appeal was listed before Court No. 43 and heard by Hon’ble Justices Salil Kumar Rai and Devendra Singh‑I. After a delay of 151 days, the …
Ganesh Prasad Verma filed a civil contempt application (No. 1996 of 2021) against Sri Krishna Kumar Singh, Deputy Director of Agriculture. The applicant was represented by counsel Kamal Nayan Tripathi and Senior Advocate Vivek Shandilya, while the opposite party was represented by K.R. Singh. The …
The applicant, Aslam Khan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a stay of the trial in Session Trial No.66/2024, which involved charges under Sections 498‑A, 302/34, 304‑B, 323/34, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He alleged that no …
Kamal Singh filed a civil contempt application (No. 3477 of 2024) against Ms. Bushra Adil Rizvi. The applicant's counsel, Shalvin, appeared, but the applicant himself did not appear before the court. The bench observed that the order of the court had either already been complied with or the …
Ram Prakash filed a civil contempt application (No. 760 of 2025) against District Magistrate/Collector Rajesh Kumar Pandey. The applicant’s counsel, Rajiv Kumar Tripathi, was listed but did not appear before the court. The court’s office report indicated that the applicant had not taken any steps to …
Risal Singh filed a criminal appeal (No. 1490 of 2014) against the State of U.P. before the Allahabad High Court. The court observed that the appeal had already been declared abated by an order dated 11 December 2025, a fact that had not been reflected in the cause list. Consequently, the court …
