Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
203 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The applicant filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 139 of 2025) under Section 103(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act, seeking release during the trial. The counsel for the applicant argued that the bail application had become infructuous …
The applicant filed a bail cancellation application seeking to set aside bail granted to the second accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 172 of 2025). No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue the application, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court …
Shamim applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 352 of 2026) originally charged under Section 103(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court had already dismissed his earlier bail application for that offence, and a charge‑sheet had subsequently been filed. In the meantime, Shamim was also …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raju, who is accused under Sections 103(1) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code for murder. Raju contended that the FIR narrative is false, the informant’s testimony is doubtful, and that his co‑accused Naresh had already been released on bail, …
The applicant Shahjad applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 83 of 2025) involving Sections 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that the prosecution's case is based solely on circumstantial evidence, a confessional statement, and statements of co-accused, with no other …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arun Richhariya, who was arrested in a murder case (Crime No. 70 of 2026) under Sections 103(1) and 191(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the statement of a co‑accused and a confessional statement by the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mantu Vishwakarma, who was named in an FIR alleging assault leading to death and injuries under various IPC sections and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the allegations against him were false, that no medical evidence existed for the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil, accused in a murder case (Crime No.184 of 2026). The applicant was named in the FIR based on circumstantial evidence: he allegedly took the deceased from his house on 18 April 2026 and later pointed to a blood‑stained spade and his own …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rakesh in a murder case (Criminal No. 88 of 2026) where the prosecution alleged involvement based on circumstantial evidence, a recovered mobile phone, and statements of co‑accused. The applicant argued that no one was named in the FIR, there was …
The applicant, Govind Singh, sought bail in a dowry‑death case where his wife was found dead by throttling. The FIR originally alleged offences under sections 80(2), 85 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act, but the charge‑sheet was later filed under sections 85, 103(1) …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Umesh in Criminal Case No. 171 of 2026, which involves offences under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. The case is based on circumstantial evidence, and the applicant was named as an accused during investigation along with …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Waris, who was accused in a homicide case (Crime No. 412 of 2025) involving the death of his sister‑in‑law. Waris argued that he was implicated solely on false allegations, had no involvement in the family dispute, and had been in …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pradeep Kumar Joshi, who was implicated in a double murder case (Crime No.309 of 2019) under Sections 302 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only linked to the crime through the statements of co‑accused and …
The Allahabad High Court disposed of two connected bail applications filed by Kamal Sharma and Lalley Dhuriya, who were named in FIR No. 47 of 2026 for murder. The prosecution’s case relied solely on CCTV footage showing co‑accused Vimal Panda and Akash firing at the deceased, with no eye‑witnesses …
The applicant, Sumit Kumar, was charged in a 2015 FIR for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 IPC, alleging indiscriminate firing that caused a death. He was arrested at the scene along with co‑accused but escaped custody in 2018 and was re‑arrested only in September 2025, having spent a …
Lalley Dhuriya filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 28648 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking release from custody in a case pending against the State of U.P. The primary issue was whether the applicant was entitled to bail. The court examined the application and, …
Hemant was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging that he and nine others opened indiscriminate fire on 5 February 2026, resulting in the death of a man whose maternal grandfather, Shyamveer Singh, is the sole eyewitness. The applicant contended that the FIR was false, filed nine hours after the …
The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 34422 of 2026 filed by Smt Shahnaz, who was named in an FIR for the murder of a man who allegedly owed her Rs 5,000. The FIR alleged that she and three co‑accused intercepted the deceased, inflicted knife injuries and further assaulted him …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Inderraj, the sole accused in a murder case (Criminal No. 937 of 2018) under Section 302 IPC. The applicant, who is deaf and dumb, had been in custody since October 2018, amounting to nearly eight years, with only six of fifteen witnesses …
The applicant, Raju Manjhi, sought bail in a murder case (S.C.No.519 of 2026) where he was not named in the FIR but eye‑witness statements implicated him. The applicant argued that the witnesses’ statements were recorded after a delay, were doubtful, and that he had no prior criminal record and was …
The applicant, Dharmveer, was charged with murder under Section 103(1) of the CrPC based on an FIR lodged 11 days after the incident. The prosecution relied on the testimony of an eye‑witness, Pramod, recorded after 12 days, and CCTV footage that allegedly identified the applicant and a co‑accused …
The applicant Pawan, along with his two brothers, was named in an FIR alleging that he assaulted the deceased with a spade, causing injuries that led to death. The applicant contended that the FIR statements were unreliable, the post‑mortem report suggested injuries could have resulted from a fight …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Sazid in a murder case (Crime No.578 of 2024) involving alleged possession of a country‑made pistol under Section 103(1) of the IPC and Sections 3, 9, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that the case is based solely on …
The applicant, Neeraj Bind, was named in an FIR alleging his participation in the murder of a deceased person, allegedly motivated by an affair between the deceased and the co-accused Priyanka, who is the applicant's sister. The prosecution's case is based solely on circumstantial evidence and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mukesh Dubey, accused of murder under IPC sections 103(1), 115(2), 3(5) and 61(2)Ka BNS. The applicant claimed the death of his wife was a suicide by aluminum phosphide, citing an inconclusive post‑mortem and a delayed, unreliable statement from …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kadeer, who is named in an FIR for murder under Sections 191(2), 190, 103(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed the allegations were false, pointing to a post‑mortem report that showed a single head injury and no direct …
The applicant, Suneel @ Girdhari, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 29035 of 2026) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, seeking release from custody in connection with charges framed by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed before Hon’ble Justice Sameer …
The High Court disposed of two connected bail applications filed by Rohit and Suneel @ Girdhari, who were named in an FIR for murder under Sections 103(1) and 238(K) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants argued that the case is based solely on circumstantial evidence, that the alleged application …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suhail, who was arrested in a double‑murder case under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. Although Suhail’s name did not appear in the FIR, the informant’s second statement and a later statement by the …
The applicant, Omsaran, filed a bail application in a murder case (Crime No. 544 of 2025) in which he is accused of killing his wife. He contended that he was the informant who lodged the FIR after his wife was assaulted and that the prosecution's case is based solely on suspicion of an illicit …
Mukesh applied for bail in a 1992 case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 IPC. He claimed that his earlier bail in 1994 was terminated because he had to leave the city for livelihood reasons, not because he absconded, and that he has been in custody since March 2024. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Yadav, who is charged under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault leading to death. The applicant argued that the FIR assigns only a general role to all accused, the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hemant Rai, who is named in an FIR for murder under Sections 3(5), 103(1), 351(3) of the IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that there was no eye‑witness to the alleged killing and that the only witnesses named the accused …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shahrukh, accused in a murder case (Criminal Case No. 283 of 2024) under Sections 302, 201 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant argued that the FIR named him only because he was a friend of the prime accused, Arbaz, the husband of the deceased, and that …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Azad Khan, who is charged under Sections 302, 147 and 506 of the IPC for a murder‑related offence. The applicant had previously been denied bail and was later declared a juvenile by the Juvenile Justice Board, being about 16 years old at …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sohan Urf Gore, who is charged under several IPC sections for an alleged assault that resulted in one death and three injuries. The prosecution alleged that the applicant participated in the assault, wielding a spear, while co‑accused Vivek used …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sarman in Criminal Case No.135 of 2025, which is based on Sections 103(1) and 238. The case rests on circumstantial evidence; the FIR did not name any accused and the applicant was implicated solely on suspicion and his own confessional …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pancham Gond (also known as Abhishek Gond) in a murder case (Crime No. 152 of 2026) involving firearm injuries. The applicant argued that he was merely a co-accused, that the eye‑witness statement did not implicate him, and that the principal …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ubaid, who is accused under several IPC sections for a murder allegedly committed by firing a weapon, resulting in two injuries to the deceased. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that he had no prior criminal record, and …
The applicant, Rinku Yadav, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.342 of 2025) involving several IPC sections and the Arms Act. While the application was pending, the applicant died in custody due to illness. Counsel for the applicant argued that the bail petition had become …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohit, who was charged in FIR No. 279/2026 for offences including Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 131, 115(2), 352, 117(2), 351(2) and 103(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant alleged that the allegations were false, that the case was …
The applicant Dhanpal filed a bail application in Crime No. 149 of 2026, claiming he was not named in the FIR and was implicated on false allegations. His counsel pointed out that the post‑mortem report showed no external injuries and the cause of death could not be ascertained, creating doubt about …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nikhil Gautam in a case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 103(1) of the IPC. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his name surfaced only in a later statement of an informant who was not an eye‑witness. The eye‑witness, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hussain Mohammad and Nagina (applicants) who were arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 405 of 2026) under IPC sections 103(1), 115(2) and 191(2). The applicants, who are in‑laws of the deceased, argued that they were implicated …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Lalit Nagar, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 133 of 2026) under Sections 103(1), 3(5), 61(2) and 238(a) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution’s case was based solely on the statements of a co‑accused, Sagar Kumar, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamlesh Nishad, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 305 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR named the applicant, but the eye‑witness statement …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anmol Singh @ Chhangur in a murder case (Crime No. 130 of 2026). The applicant was named in the FIR, but the prosecution's case relied solely on circumstantial evidence, a confessional statement, and the recovery of a wooden stick pointed out by …
The applicant, Ramadhar Yadav, sought bail in a case originally filed under Section 87 of the Indian Penal Code against his son, which was later converted to Section 103(1) after a death. The prosecution’s case against the applicant rests solely on the statements of his son, a co-accused, and his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaurav Sharma, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 151 of 2026) under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the FIR was initially lodged at a different police station and later transferred, …
Dheeraj Kumar was arrested in a murder case (Crime No. 36 of 2026) alleged under IPC sections 103(1), 351(3) and the Arms Act (sections 4 and 25). The prosecution’s case rests on a knife allegedly recovered from an open place and statements of witnesses who were not eye‑witnesses. The applicant …
The applicant, Sinku @ Mukesh, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 168 of 2026) based largely on a second statement by an informant and a confessional statement recorded by the investigating officer, with no other substantive evidence. The applicant sought bail, arguing that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vivek Kumar Gautam in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 103(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant was not named in the FIR, but his name appeared in a later statement of an informant who was not an eye‑witness; a …
The applicant, Naman @ Namo, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 103 of 2026) based largely on the statements of two witnesses who claimed to have seen him with an axe near a river and on the subsequent recovery of an axe and blood‑stained clothes. The applicant contended that …
The applicant, Nem Singh, who is the informant in a murder case, filed an application seeking cancellation of the bail granted to the accused (Opposite Party No. 2) during the pendency of trial. The applicant argued that the accused had pointed out the deceased's mobile phone and the weapon used, …
The applicant, Sandeep Chaudhary, sought bail in a murder case (Crime No. 360 of 2026) involving the death of his father‑in‑law and injuries to his wife. He alleged that the FIR and witness statements were false, pointing to a five‑day delay in recording statements and a hospital register noting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajendra, who was named in an FIR for assaulting the father of an informant, which later resulted in the father's death. The applicant contended that the allegations against him were false, that the case was originally filed under Section 109 IPC …
The applicant sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 078 of 2026) involving murder and injuries, alleging that the charges against him were false and that he had no prior criminal record. The prosecution argued that the applicant and co‑accused Sajid were the prime perpetrators, citing the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pawan Rajbhar, who was not named in the FIR but was later made an accused in a case involving offences under Sections 190, 191(2), 103(2), 324(5) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the role of causing injury to the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bijendra in a criminal case (Crime No.152 of 2026) involving sections of the CrPC, IPC and the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The FIR, originally lodged against five other accused, was later amended to include Bijendra after a dead body was …
The applicant Kamal sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.151 of 2026) involving sections of the Indian Penal Code relating to abduction and related offences. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on statements of two alleged eye‑witnesses recorded more than two months after the incident, which …
The High Court considered a third bail application filed by Jailal Rajbhar, who has been in custody since July 2019 for alleged offences under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC. The applicant argued that the trial had been delayed for over seven years, with only six of ten witnesses examined, and that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nirmal Kumar, who was charged under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged murder. The applicant argued that the FIR allegations were false, the informant was not an eye‑witness, and CCTV footage showed only a …
The applicant, Rishabh @ Bobby Yadav, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 638 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, being the maternal uncle (phupha) of the …
Geeta Devi, a 65‑year‑old woman, was arrested in connection with the murder of her husband under a non‑bailable offence (Criminal Case No. 173 of 2026). She alleged that the accusations were false, claiming the deceased’s habitual liquor consumption led to a family dispute during which her sons …
The applicant, Pratap Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder that allegedly occurred during a sudden dispute at a marriage function, where he is said to have struck the deceased with a bracelet. The FIR and several eyewitness statements identify him as the assailant, but a video clip shows …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Jay Singh, who has been in custody for over eight years pending trial for murder with ransom under Sections 302, 34 and 364A, 34 of the IPC. The applicant argued that the prolonged pre‑trial detention violated his fundamental right to a …
The applicant, Istekhar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 057 of 2026) under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) BNS of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued that the FIR named him and four others, but the prosecution’s case relied solely on statements of two informants who were not eye‑witnesses, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Genda Singh Urf Genda Lal, who is the father‑in‑law of a deceased woman alleged to have been poisoned. The applicant argued that the allegations against him were false, that the post‑mortem report was inconclusive, and that the primary accused …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajesh Nishad, who was arrested in Crime No.187 of 2025 under Sections 103(1) and 238(b) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident, the case relied solely on circumstantial …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash @ Bhunda, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No.163 of 2025) based solely on being the last person seen with the deceased. The FIR was initially lodged against an unknown person, but the investigation named the …
The applicant, Sitesh, was named in an FIR along with six others for alleged murder and related offences under Sections 103(1), 109, 351(3), 3(5) and 61(2). The informant‑witness, who is also the applicant’s brother‑in‑law, claimed that eight unknown persons committed the crime and that the named …
Vishal was arrested in connection with the alleged murder of his 70‑year‑old grandmother, with the prosecution alleging that he assaulted her while intoxicated. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that he was heavily intoxicated at the time, and that the key eyewitnesses—his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi Prakash Jha in a case involving alleged cheating of Rs. 10 lakh. The applicant claimed the allegations were false and that a prior police inquiry in 2023 found no proof of the money being given, resulting in no FIR at that time; the FIR was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Umesh Kesharvani in a criminal case (Crime No. 92 of 2025) involving alleged cheating, fraud and forgery under sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicant claimed he was a bona‑fide purchaser of the informant’s property and that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tanmay Bandhopadhyay and Subhmay Banerjee in a criminal case (Crime No. 368 of 2023) alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The applicants, directors of a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajeet Singh alias Lalu alias Lambu, who is charged under Sections 305A, 331(4) and 317(5) of the BNS for alleged theft and dealing in stolen property. The applicant contended that the allegations are false, that the stolen articles recovered from …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjeet Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case under Section 304(2) of the BNS for allegedly snatching a golden chain. The applicant contended that the allegations were false and that his inclusion as an accused was based solely on the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aftab @ Gulab, accused of multiple offences including assault under several sections of the BNS. The applicant argued that he has no prior criminal record and that a co-accused, Wajid Ali, had already been released on bail by a coordinate bench. …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit Johari and Shiva Johri, who were later made accused in a GST fraud case despite not being named in the FIR. The applicants contended that they merely performed data‑entry work for GST registrations, received no money, and did not …
The applicant, Jai Prakash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail under CrPC Section 482 in a case involving alleged cheating under IPC Sections 140(1), 127(2), 351(3), 352 and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court had earlier granted interim anticipatory bail on 17‑03‑2026, which …
The applicant, Noor Mohammad, father‑in‑law of a woman who died by hanging, sought bail in a dowry‑related murder case (Crime No. 484 of 2025) under Sections 85, 80(2) of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He argued that no specific allegation was made against him, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pappu in Criminal Case No. 767 of 2021, which alleged offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376DA, 376(2)(N), 323, 506 and POCSO Act sections 3/4(2), 5(L)/6. The victim, a minor of about 13 years, gave an initial statement under Section 161 CrPC …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Idda, who is accused in a case registered under Sections 80(2), 85 of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated, being the father‑in‑law of the deceased who allegedly …
The applicant, the father‑in‑law of a young bride who allegedly committed suicide within three months of marriage, sought bail in a dowry‑death case. The FIR and investigation statements allege torture for dowry, and the deceased’s dying declaration also implicates the applicant as one of the …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Pintu Yadav, who has been in custody since December 2022 for alleged murder, attempt to murder and criminal conspiracy under Sections 302, 201 and 120B IPC. The applicant argued that the trial had been delayed for over three years, with …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ritesh Kumar Kharwar, who was in custody for more than five months in a case involving multiple IPC offences (229, 233, 237, 246, 318, 338, 336, 340). The applicant’s counsel argued that allegations of him taking sureties for other accused and …
Mukesh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 773 of 2025) involving multiple IPC offences, including sections 229, 233, 237, 246, 318(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2). The prosecution alleged that Mukesh habitually took sureties for other accused and prepared fake documents, while also …
The applicant, Vijay Vishwakarma, sought bail in a dowry‑death case (Crime No. 258 of 2025) alleging that his wife’s death was a suicide caused by a uterine fibroid, not a dowry‑related homicide. The prosecution argued that the wife died under abnormal circumstances within seven years of marriage …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rihan, the driver of a truck alleged to have misappropriated 888 bags of rice belonging to an informant. The prosecution charged him under several IPC sections including 318(4), 316(5), 303(2), 317(2), 238(a) and 61(2) BNS. The applicant argued …
Vinay Jain was arrested in Crime No. 449 of 2025 under IPC sections 308(5) and 351(2) for alleged extortion. The informant claimed the applicant threatened him but admitted no money was received. The applicant has six other criminal cases, three of which are concurrent with the present case, and he …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhinav Singh (also known as Dr. Rajiv Gupta) in Crime No. 1422 of 2025, where he was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged forgery and related offences. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Smt Chhavi, who is the sister‑in‑law of a deceased person alleged to have been murdered. The applicant claimed the death was a suicide, citing the post‑mortem report showing a hanging with no other injuries and an intact hyoid bone, and argued …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Gupta, accused in a dowry‑death case where his wife was found hanged. The applicant claimed the death was a suicide, citing a compromise agreement dated 11‑07‑2025 and a post‑mortem report showing no injuries other than the ligature mark. …
Altaf, the husband of a woman who died by hanging, was accused under Sections 80 and 85 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry‑related torture. The applicant contended that the death was a suicide, supported by a post‑mortem report showing no injuries other …
Satish Yadav, husband of a woman who died under suspicious circumstances, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.174 of 2025) alleging that his wife committed suicide by ingesting aluminium phosphide. The applicant argued that the post‑mortem viscera report and the hostile statements of the …
The applicant, Pankaj, sought bail in a dowry‑related murder case (Crime No. 540 of 2024) alleging that his wife’s death was a suicide precipitated by depression after the loss of their two children. The FIR, filed by the deceased’s father, accused Pankaj of torturing his wife to demand a motorcycle …
The applicant, Mursalin, mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought bail in a dowry‑death case where she was charged under IPC sections 85, 80(2), 351(3) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She claimed that the deceased was strangled by her husband and that she was in her Iddat period, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikram Singh Yadav, who was charged under several IPC sections for allegedly fraudulently executing a sale deed of a disputed property. The applicant argued that the dispute was essentially civil, citing a pending injunction suit and a prior …
Satendra, a branch manager of a finance company, was charged under Section 316(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly embezzling Rs. 8,30,682. He contended that the allegations were false and that he had himself filed an FIR against the company's collection agents for misappropriating funds, indicating his …
Ashok Kumar Ahirwar, charged with rape and related offences under Sections 376(1), 328, 323, 342, 506 IPC and Section 67 IT Act, had been in judicial custody for over three and a half years while only three of six prosecution witnesses had been examined. The applicant sought bail, arguing that his …
The applicant, Ram Ayodhya Gond, a father‑in‑law of a deceased woman who allegedly committed suicide, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 85, 80(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. He contended that the allegations against him were false, that the deceased died …
The applicant, Titu, was arrested in connection with a property‑related case (Crime No. 570 of 2025) alleging fraud under several IPC sections. He contended that the sale deed in question was validly executed in his favour in 2019 and that the subsequent sale to a third party, Neha Sharma, was a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vineet, who was arrested on 22 January 2026 in connection with an extortion case (Crime No. 27 of 2026) under Sections 308(5) and 61(2) BNS. The applicant's only evidence was a confessional statement to police and the statement of a co‑accused; …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin, accused under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(3) and 324(4) for allegedly assaulting an informant with wooden sticks. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that the informant had a criminal history, and that the …
The applicant, Intezam, sought bail in a 2014 case involving alleged forgery and fraud under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. He claimed the FIR was false, that a stay of his arrest was granted in 2014, and that his relocation to Delhi prevented his appearance, not an intention to abscond. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aneesh, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault and multiple IPC offences. The applicant argued that the allegations were false, the injuries were minor, and that co‑accused Mohammad Ashraf and Bilal had already been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd Quddus Alias Quddus, who is alleged to be a Malaysian national but was erroneously entered in the Indian voter list. The applicant faces charges under Sections 318(4), 319, 335, 336(3), 338 and 340 of the Indian Penal Code, and has been in …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ranveer @ Rana, who was arrested in connection with the theft of an ATM machine (Criminal Case No. 900 of 2025). The prosecution’s case relied solely on the statements of a co‑accused and the applicant’s own confessional statement, with no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Radhadas in a case under Sections 318(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging fraud and receipt of Rs. 15 lakh. The applicant argued that the allegations were false, he had no prior criminal record, and had been in custody for almost a …
Manish, the husband of a woman who died after ingesting aluminium phosphide, was charged under Sections 85, 80(2), 115(2), 352 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the death was a suicide arising from matrimonial discord, that he had no prior criminal …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sheetal, accused in a dowry‑death case (Criminal Case No. 508 of 2025) alleging that she and the husband of the deceased had an illicit relationship which led the daughter to commit suicide. The prosecution argued that the accused were principal …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Juber, who is the father‑in‑law of a deceased person, in a criminal case (Crime No. 461 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant argued that the death …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin, accused in a case under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 85, 80(2) of the IPC, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging the death of his wife was a suicide. The applicant argued that the deceased was short‑tempered, that …
Amarnath Sharma, accused of offences under Sections 147, 302, 307, 323 and 504 IPC, has been in judicial custody since December 7, 2019. This was his third bail application; the earlier two were dismissed. The applicant argued that the trial had been delayed for over six years, with only one of …
The applicant Rishabh was arrested in connection with a case originally registered under section 304(2) BNS for alleged murder, but the investigation was later recast as robbery under sections 309(4) and 317(2) BNS. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, no incriminating material …
The applicant, Anand Kushwaha, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 340 of 2024) alleging fraud and forgery related to a sale deed of property allegedly belonging to Jeevan Lal Mishra. He contended that the FIR was lodged by him, the allegations of forgery are false, and that the …
The applicant, Rais, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 06 of 2026) involving alleged fraud and several IPC offences, claiming he had returned the entire misappropriated amount of Rs.5,30,000 to the informant and that the informant raised no objection. The State opposed bail, but the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Asgar, accused in a dowry‑death case (Crime No. 810 of 2025) under Sections 80(2), 85 of the Evidence Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant, husband of the deceased, claimed the death was a suicide, citing the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Hareeshchandra, who was arrested in a case under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 for allegedly cheating a person of Rs 1,00,000 by promising a job. The applicant contended that the FIR was vague, that the alleged receipt of money was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saleem, who is charged under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61(2), 126(2), 115(2) and 351(3) of the BNS for alleged fraudulent execution of a sale deed. The applicant contended that the allegations are false, no consideration was received for the deed, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kismat Ali @ Wali Mohammad, who was accused under several sections of the BNS for alleged fraud involving a sale deed. The applicant claimed he was merely a witness to the deed executed by co‑accused Salim and denied any participation in the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sameea, who was accused under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 for alleged involvement in fake sureties filed on behalf of her son, Rashid. The applicant argued that she merely acted as a parivi (representative) for her son, did not arrange the …
The applicant, Asif, was arrested in connection with a theft allegedly committed using a poisonous substance, and was charged under Sections 317(2), 318(4), 303(2) and 123 BNS of the IPC. He contended that the FIR was lodged against unknown persons, that the allegations against him were false, and …
The applicant, Munsarif, sought bail in a criminal case (No. 518 of 2025) where he was accused of fraudulently obtaining a KCC loan of Rs.5,00,000 by posing as Shabir Shah and acting as a guarantor. The FIR, filed by a bank manager, alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit, who was accused under IPC sections 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 309(5) BNS for allegedly causing knife injuries. The prosecution’s case relied on a later statement of the injured party that named Ankit, whereas the earlier statement did not …
The applicant, Sonu Yadav, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Crime No. 208 of 2024) based primarily on the confessional statement of a co-accused, with no other incriminating material recovered from his possession. He has a past criminal record of 28 cases, most of which were concluded …
The applicant, Shekhar Bhardwaj, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 646 of 2025) alleging extortion and an attempt to fire at an informant, though no injury was caused. He has a prior criminal record of eleven cases, including five under Section 307 IPC, but in those cases no injury …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit Kumar, who is charged under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged fraud and forgery related to a sale deed. The applicant contended that he was only a witness to the deed and had no prior criminal record, …
The applicant, Rajendra Singh Gurjar, filed a short‑term bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.208 of 2014) involving multiple IPC offences. The application was sought to enable the applicant to attend his daughter's marriage. After the marriage was solemnized, the applicant’s counsel …
The applicant, Ankit @ Shashikant Tiwari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where he was alleged to have opened fire on an informant, though no injury was reported. The applicant argued that the allegation was false, the investigation was pending, and his …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Kishan Singh, who was accused of offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 351(3) of the IPC. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, that the alleged …
The applicant, Bhagwat Nishad, father‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was arrested under IPC Sections 85, 80(2), 108 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The deceased was found hanged and the post‑mortem report indicated no injury to the hyoid bone, suggesting a possible suicide. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivam Yadav, accused in a dowry‑related death case (Crime No. 0125 of 2025) under Sections 80(2), 85 B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant contended that his wife died by suicide, supported by an autopsy …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Ankur Shukla, accused in Crime No.151 of 2025 for the death of his wife. The applicant contended that the death was a suicide, citing a post‑mortem report showing hanging, an intact hyoid bone, and the hostile, non‑supportive testimony of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Meena Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman who allegedly died by suicide within two months of marriage. The applicant argued that the death was a suicide, citing the post‑mortem report showing a hanging with no other injuries, and that she …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farman alias Bhoot, who is charged under Section 109 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly opening fire on a police party, though no police officer was injured. The applicant has a substantial criminal history, with 21 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raja Quraishi, who was charged under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged cow slaughter offences. The applicant contended …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raja Quraishi, who was accused under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged cow‑slaughter offences. The applicant claimed the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash, accused in a case involving the death of his wife, alleged to be a suicide by hanging. The applicant argued that the death was a suicide and that he had no prior serious criminal record, while the prosecution highlighted the abnormal …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ekta Anand in a criminal case (Crime No. 435 of 2025) involving alleged fraud under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 315(2). The applicant claimed that the sole amount transferred to her account was Rs. 50,000, part of a settlement …
Rishipal Singh Yadav, detained since 8 December 2020, sought bail in a case (Crime No.141 of 2010) involving alleged fraud and cheating under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. His earlier bail application was rejected because he is a prior convict, including a murder conviction, and has …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Prem Prakash Bharti, who was accused under Section 316(5) BNS for alleged misappropriation of paddy procurement funds while serving as In‑charge of a Paddy Procurement Center. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that he had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd. Yusuf Khan, who was charged under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged fraud. The applicant argued that he had returned the entire amount of Rs.176,000 received from the informant, as ordered by a …
The applicant, Jasim alias Abdul Rahman, sought bail in a fraud case (Criminal No. 277 of 2025) alleging that he and co‑accused Sheebu defrauded an informant of Rs.8,65,000. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that Sheebu was the principal offender and had already been released …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajveer Singh Yadav, who was accused under several IPC sections for allegedly hurting Hindu religious sentiments through a book he edited and statements attributed to a co‑accused. The FIR was originally against Saroj Sargam; Yadav was …
Manoj Sahani, accused under IPC sections 498A, 304B and the Domestic Violence Act for the alleged dowry‑related death of his wife, has been in judicial custody since June 2022. He filed a second bail application, arguing that the trial has been delayed for almost four years because prosecution …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas Pasi, who was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting an informant, resulting in injury to the informant's hand, a non‑vital part. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, the injury was minor, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arun Kumar in a criminal case (Crime No. 628 of 2024) involving alleged forgery of a sale deed and property possession. The applicant argued that the sale deed was forged, that a rent agreement and a civil suit settlement demonstrated the dispute …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiv Shankar Kannaujia, who is charged under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC for alleged involvement in fraudulent sale deeds and a bank loan. The applicant, a proprietor of M/s Radhika Colonizers Private Limited, contended that …
The applicant Sabhajeet Mishra, a police Sub Inspector, filed a bail application in Case Crime No. 126 of 2025 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 447, 506, 452, 384, 307, 34 and 120B IPC, Police Station Gwaltoli, District Kanpur Nagar. The allegation against him was that he, along with co-accused …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramashray Prajapati, who is charged under several IPC sections including 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352 and 351(3)BNS for allegedly misappropriating Rs 35 lakh invested by his wife and son. The applicant contended that the allegations …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ranjeet, accused in a case under Sections 85, 80(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act, relating to the death of his wife who allegedly committed suicide by hanging. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Kashyap, who was arrested in connection with a fraud case (Criminal No. 480 of 2024) involving alleged fake bank accounts and misappropriation of loan amounts under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The applicant, a recovery agent, …
The applicants, Pyar Mohammad @ Aliyas and Hakikat, were charged under Sections 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly opening fire on a police party, although no police officer was injured. They have a criminal history of more than ten cases, most of …
Ashu Jain, a clerk in a district court advocate's office, was charged under Section 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code (420 IPC) and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly using fake documents to file bail bonds. He has seven prior criminal cases, all of which are old and he is presently out …
The applicant, Anil, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 592 of 2025) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that he is neither a gang member nor a leader and that in the two related base cases shown in the gang chart, as …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anas, accused in Crime No. 666 of 2025 under several sections of the BNS and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant claimed that the alleged firearm injury to the victim, Sartaj, was actually caused by a hard blunt object, as …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sohail (alias Suhan) under Sections 20 and 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act in connection with the recovery of more than 74 kg of ganja from a vehicle in which he and his wife were seated. The applicant contended …
The applicant, Manish, sought bail in a case under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act where 1.06 kg of charas was allegedly recovered from his possession. He contended that the recovery was false, that procedural safeguards under Sections 50 and 52 were not followed, and that his prior criminal …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rishabh Chaurasiya, who is the brother‑in‑law of the FIR complainant. The FIR originally contained charges of dowry harassment but no rape allegation; however, during investigation the complainant recorded statements alleging rape. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raghvendra Pratap Singh alias Ghuran Singh in a case (Crime No.235 of 2025) involving alleged firing on a police party under Section 109 of the BNS Act and Sections 3, 7, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, which correspond to Section 307 of the IPC. The …
The applicant, Shubham, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 413 of 2025) under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that although he is named as an accused in the present matter and three other base cases shown in a …
The applicant, Deepak Badkareya Khatik, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2(kha)(1) and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities Act, 1986. He argued that he is not a gang member or leader, has no criminal history apart from two prior cases where he was already released on …
The applicant, Mohammad Zafar, was arrested in a case under Sections 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, for alleged involvement in illegal sex trade. He contended that the allegations were false, that the guest house where girls were rescued belonged to co‑accused Anil Kumar …
The applicant, Ishrak @ Kale Khan, sought bail in a case filed under Sections 3(1) and 2(b)(xvii) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that he is neither a gang member nor a leader and that the sole case linking him to a gang is isolated, while his other …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ibrahim Ansari, who was charged under Sections 8, 15(C), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act in a case where more than 12 quintals of poppy were recovered from the cement store of co‑accused Amarpal Singh. The prosecution’s case against Ansari rests solely …
The applicant, Shani Prajapati, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 163 of 2024) under Sections 85 and 80 of the BNS Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the death of his wife, who allegedly committed suicide by hanging. The applicant’s counsel …
The applicant, husband of a woman who died within 13 months of marriage, sought bail in a dowry death case (Criminal No. 376 of 2024) alleging that the death was a suicide and that the post‑mortem report was erroneous. The prosecution argued that the post‑mortem indicated strangulation, making it a …
The applicant, husband of a woman who died by hanging within two and a half years of marriage, sought bail in a case filed under Section 80(2) of the Indian Penal Code (dowry death) along with Sections 85, 115(2) IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohan Singh, who is the father‑in‑law of a woman who allegedly committed suicide within six months of marriage. The applicant claimed the allegations against him were false, that the deceased had an illicit relationship, and that …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Nitish @ Shivendra, who was named as an accused in a suicide case under Section 306 IPC. The applicant argued that the allegations were false, that he had no prior criminal record, and that a charge‑sheet had …
The applicant filed a bail cancellation application seeking to cancel the bail granted to the second opposite party, Beopal, in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. The application was pending since 2023. No counsel or parties appeared for either side when the matter was called, although …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Nitesh Kumar, who is charged under IPC sections 376AB and 506 and Sections 5m/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual assault of a two‑year‑old girl. The applicant had been in custody since 30 June 2023, over two and a half years, and the …
Ankit Kashyap was arrested in connection with offences under IPC sections 105, 351(2), 351(3), 352 and the Arms Act and has been in jail since 21‑12‑2024. Only one of the fourteen charge‑sheet witnesses, the informant, has been examined and the informant altered his statement about the place of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bittu, who is accused in a murder case (Crime No. 60 of 2025) arising from the alleged suicide of his wife. The applicant argued that the death was a suicide, supported by the post‑mortem report, and that he has no prior criminal record, having …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jeetu (alias Jitendra), who is accused in a case involving sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Dowry Prohibition Act relating to the death of his wife. The applicant claimed the death was a suicide, supported by the post‑mortem report and …
The applicant, Sunil, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 224 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POPCSO Act. The trial court had already convicted him of these offences. The informant’s counsel argued that the …
Nitish Sharma applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 324, 452 and 308 IPC. This was his second anticipatory bail application after an earlier one was dismissed on 08.04.2024. The applicant argued that new facts, not previously before the court, justified the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Prabha Devi, who was accused in a case of alleged homicide under Sections 85, 80(2) of the CrPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant, the mother‑in‑law of the deceased, argued that the death was a suicide by hanging and that there were …
The applicant Aman, the brother-in-law of a deceased woman, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 498A, 304B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations against him were false, that the post‑mortem indicated death by hanging, …
The applicant, Bittu, was arrested in connection with the death of his wife, who allegedly committed suicide by hanging within 11 months of their marriage, which was arranged under a government scheme. The prosecution alleged that Bittu tortured the deceased to extort money and a motorcycle, but the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Atendra, who is accused under Sections 498A, 304B, 323 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in connection with the death of his wife, alleged to be a suicide. The applicant’s counsel argued that the allegations were false, …
Faraz Khan filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31421 of 2025) in Criminal Case No. 103 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The trial of the case had already been concluded and the applicant had …
Anuj Kumar was charged in a murder case (Crime No. 103 of 2025) under several IPC sections, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The prosecution’s case rests mainly on the applicant’s own confessional statement, the statement of co‑accused Pranshu Pal, and a two‑second phone call with the deceased; no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sher Mohammad, who was accused under several CrPC provisions and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the victim, with whom he had a consensual relationship, later made false accusations …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Sonu @ Navneet in a case involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant's first bail plea had been rejected, but co‑accused Vinod and Kapoor Singh were later released on bail, leading the applicant to argue that his case was on par with …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Santosh, the husband of a deceased woman, who was accused under IPC sections 80, 85, 351(3), 352 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry‑related offences. The applicant argued that the deceased’s suicide note and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vipin, the husband of a deceased woman, who was accused under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for dowry‑related offences. The applicant contended that the death was a suicide, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rupesh, the husband of a woman who allegedly committed suicide by hanging after a dispute over dowry. The prosecution had charged him under Sections 85, 80(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. …
The applicant, Sonu Kumar, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.475 of 2022) involving charges under Sections 363 and 376(3) of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant was not present when the application was listed, while the State’s counsel appeared. …
The applicant, Sameer Usmani, was charged under Sections 85, 80(2) of the CrPC, Section 3/4 of the D.P. Act and Section 302 IPC for allegedly murdering his wife after demanding a Mercedes car. The applicant contended that the death was accidental, citing the post‑mortem, vehicle examination, …
The applicant, Avanish (also known as Anish), was arrested in connection with the death of his wife, who allegedly committed suicide by ingesting aluminum phosphide within three months of marriage. The prosecution alleged dowry‑related harassment and possible murder, but the deceased’s mother, who …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Kumar, who was accused in Crime No. 303 of 2025 for alleged rape under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the Evidence Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed the alleged victim, aged between 13 and 16 according to …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Ravi Kumar, who has been in custody for over one and a half years for an offence under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that no prosecution witness had been examined and that he was not causing any delay in the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitesh in Criminal Case No. 95 of 2025, which involved alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 87 of the B.N.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the victim, a 17‑year‑old schoolgirl, had …
Sujeet Yadav was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged sexual offences against a 13‑year‑8‑month‑old girl, charged under several IPC sections, the POCSO Act, the Information Technology Act and the SC/ST Act. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS did …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajan, accused in Criminal Case No. 414 of 2025 for offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), 123 BNS of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, gave contradictory statements: initially she identified the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan Kumar, accused in Crime No. 928 of 2025 under IPC sections 65(1), 351(3), 61(2), 115(2) and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 13‑year‑old girl. The victim’s first statement under Section 180 of the Evidence Act did not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Firoz Ansari, accused of rape under Sections 64(1), 127(2) of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, and Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the victim’s statements were contradictory and that she …
Shahbaj alias Shabbu applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 108 of 2025) where he is charged under IPC sections 137(2), 351(3), 64, the POCSO Act (sections 3 and 4) and the SC/ST Act (section 3(2)(V)). The prosecution’s victim, about 17 years old, allegedly gave consent in statements …
