Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SAMIT GOPAL

182 judgments · newest first · showing 1–182

BALIRAM AND AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Jivanand Upadhyay filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the VI Additional Sessions Judge, Mirzapur, dated 25 May 1984. No counsel appeared for the appellant, while the State counsel was present. An office report dated 30 September 2026 confirmed that the appellant had died. …

KULDEEPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Kuldeep appealed against the order of the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) dated 23.02.2026, seeking bail and setting aside the conviction under multiple IPC and SC/ST Act provisions. The FIR alleged that the victim's son was attacked by unknown persons, with the appellant’s name appearing …

XXX JUVENILEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The juvenile revisionist filed a criminal revision seeking to set aside the order of the Juvenile Judge and the Juvenile Justice Board dated 27.02.2025 and 25.08.2025, which had convicted the juvenile under sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act. The revisionist's counsel later moved that the …

RAM MILANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the second bail application filed by Ram Milan under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 in a dowry death case (Crime No. 241 of 2024) involving the alleged drowning of his wife, Renu Devi. The applicant argued that the death was a suicide, that he was not present at the …

RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The appellant Rahul was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions for alleged rape and caste‑related abuse following a broken marriage promise. The victim, a 20‑year‑old woman, had given contradictory statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC, and …

MAUSIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. by Mausim, who was in custody for offences under Sections 85, 80(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial had commenced and three prosecution witnesses—Wajid, Nazuk Jahan, …

ANURAG DHAMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Anurak Dhama filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summoning order dated 14‑05‑2026 issued by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act, and …

RAMKRIT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ramkrit Yadav, filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 32338 of 2023) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The matter was heard by Justice Samit Gopal. The court rejected the bail application. The order refers to the form of order issued in Criminal …

WALI AHMAD ALIAS WALIYATversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Wali Ahmad alias Waliyat, filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. after his earlier bail plea was rejected. The case involves charges under Sections 333, 352, 64 and 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. based on a complaint lodged at Kemri police station. The trial court …

RAJ KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Raj Kumar Verma filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 34114 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. The application was opposed by the State of U.P. and another party. Counsel for the applicant were Kamlakar Pal and Satish Chandra Mishra; counsel for the opposite parties were Rahul …

JAYSHEEL TIWARIversusUNION OF INDIA

The applicants, police personnel including Jaysheel Tiwari, Ramkrit Yadav, Raj Kumar Verma and Angad Prasad Chaudhary, sought bail in connection with the custodial death of Krishna Kumar Yadav @ Pujari in Jaunpur in February 2021. The FIR alleged that the SOG team and police officials took the …

NEM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Nem Singh appealed against the order of the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act that denied him bail in a case alleging rape, assault and other offences. The FIR alleged that the appellant had a consensual relationship with the victim, later threatened her, and was accused …

ASHOK AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants Ashok, Gangaram, Vinod and Pramod filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Special Trial No. 293 of 2016, which involved charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 325 and Section 3(1)(X) of the SC/ST Act. A coordinate bench of the Allahabad High Court had …

SUNITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sunita Devi filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to cancel the bail granted to the accused in Session Trial No. 2114 of 2025, which involved offences under several sections of the same Act. The appeal was listed before the Allahabad High …

RAVI KULSHRESTHA @ RAVI KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants – Ravi Kulshrestha, Rohit Kumar Sharma and Mayank Sikarwar – filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant issued by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Agra. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants withdrew the prayer to quash the …

AKHIL GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Akhil Gupta and Nihal Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 288 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(da)(dha) of the SC/ST Act. The …

PHOOLCHANRA KUSHWAHA URF DAYASAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Phoolchanra Kushwaha Urf Dayasagar filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and stay the proceedings in a POCSO case (Sections 354‑A IPC, 7/8 POCSO Act, 3(2)va SC/ST Act). The applicant prayed for the entire proceeding to be set aside. On the hearing …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Vinod Kumar, who is alleged to be involved in a dowry‑related case concerning the death of his daughter‑in‑law Seema. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the cause of death was asphyxia due to antemortem hanging and that …

SAHIL ALIAS NIRHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Sahil alias Nirhu, who is charged under Sections 498‑A, 304‑B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in connection with the death of his wife. The trial court had already rejected his first bail plea, noting …

SHIVAM @ SUGAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicants Shivam @ Sugam and Ram Kishor filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summoning order dated 30 June 2023 in Complaint Case No. 7512 of 2023 filed by Santosh Verma (opposite party 2) alleging offences under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 and 379 IPC. The …

DR BADRI PRASAD AGRAWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dr. Badri Prasad Agrawal, a 79‑year‑old senior citizen, appealed against a bail rejection order of a Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The FIR alleged that he raped a domestic worker on 4‑Nov‑2024 and threatened to release a video, but the FIR was lodged only on …

SUNIL KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Sunil Kumar (deceased), Aman @ Bholu and Rakesh Singh filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash Special Case No.35 of 2023 (Tridev Singh v. Sunil Kumar et al.) pending before the Special Judge, Etawah, alleging that the criminal case was false, stemmed from a land dispute, …

ROHIT AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, comprising a husband (Rohit) and his relatives, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the charge sheet and stay proceedings in a dowry harassment case filed under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act. They …

ANTRIKSH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Antriksh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Session Case No. 883 of 2022) against Bharat Singh and others, which involved offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The applicant later indicated that the …

MOHAN AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 6950 of 2020) arising from offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 of the IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court settlement, which was verified by the …

MONIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Moni filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and stay the trial proceedings arising under the SC/ST (P.A.) Act. The applicant also requested that the trial court decide his bail application expeditiously, emphasizing that he is a lady. The State did not …

RAM LAL JAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ram Lal Jayan filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a further investigation, transfer of the investigation, and a supplementary charge sheet in a criminal case pending before the Special Judge. The applicant alleged that without these orders he would suffer irreparable loss. …

MOHD. NADEEM ALIAS RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohd Nadeem alias Raju, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 09.03.2017 passed under Section 245(2) CrPC and to stay criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 323 and 504 IPC. The application also requested that the …

GYAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Gyan Singh filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and the criminal proceedings against him in Criminal Case No. 40 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant’s counsel, Kamal Singh, did …

MOHD NADEEM @ RAJU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohd Nadeem @ Raju and Mohd Faheem, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 08.03.2019 and the subsequent order of cognizance, as well as to stay all related criminal proceedings pending before the Additional Chief …

RAJESH MANI TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rajesh Mani Tripathi filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Samit Gopal. The court noted that a detailed order had been passed in a related matter, …

RAJESH MANI TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajesh Mani Tripathi, filed two applications before the Allahabad High Court: one under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a July 30, 2026 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate in a rape case (CrPC Section 376) and another under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the …

BALLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ballu filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 29‑06‑2026 in a complaint case (Kamla Devi v. Ballu) and to stay the proceedings. The court noted that the petition was incomplete because the referenced medical examination reports were not …

JANARDAN YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Janardan Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash and stay the criminal proceedings (Session Case No. 432 of 2026) against him, alleging irreparable loss if the case proceeded. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant clarified that he no longer wished to …

AKASHversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Akash appealed against the order of the Special Judge dated 17.08.2026 in a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act alleging rape, video recording and other offences. The FIR alleged that the appellant had lured and assaulted the victim, a 21‑year‑old …

RAKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered four related bail appeals filed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by Rakesh Kumar, Vipin, Aman Kumar @ Tagharu and Rajendra Tiwari, who were accused of assaulting Kuldeep, who later died. The FIR was …

VIPINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Vipin filed Criminal Appeal No. 5793 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the lower court. The appeal sought relief including the grant of bail. After hearing counsel for both parties, the court granted bail to the appellant. The court also allowed the …

AMAN KUMAR @ TAGHARUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Aman Kumar, filed a criminal appeal challenging the order passed by the trial court. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and another, opposed the relief sought. The High Court of Allahabad examined the arguments and the material on record. The Court granted bail to the …

RAJENDRA TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Rajendra Tiwari, filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the lower court. The appeal sought relief, including the grant of bail. The court, after hearing counsel for both parties, granted bail to the appellant. It also allowed the appeal, …

ANKU SHAKYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Anku Shakya was charged under IPC sections 376(1) and 506, the POCSO Act sections 3 and 4, and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(2)(5) and 14A(2). The Additional District & Sessions Judge denied bail in Bail Application No. 421 of 2017. The appellant filed a criminal …

DILSHAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Dilshad and three others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16‑06‑2022 and the cognizance order dated 24‑02‑2023, and to stay further proceedings. Although two counsel were listed for the applicants, no one …

TINKUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Tinku filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to set aside a bail rejection order dated 19 May 2017 in a case involving charges of rape under Section 376 IPC, offences under the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. The appeal was …

DILEEP GAUDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The appellant Dileep Gaud filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 challenging a bail order dated 26 July 2017 passed by the Special Judge in a case involving offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The State informed the Court that …

GYANENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Gyanendra Kumar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 17‑02‑2023 and the pending criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation …

SUKHA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Sukha Singh, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to set aside a Special Judge's order that denied bail in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120B of the IPC and Section 3(2)(5) of …

IMRANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Imran appealed against the order of the Special Judge dated 24 March 2026 in a case under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking bail. The FIR, lodged on 22 January 2026 by a 40‑year‑old married woman, alleged rape, blackmail and theft, but was filed after an unexplained …

MANISH KUMAR GUPTA ALIAS MANISH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manish Kumar Gupta appealed to the Allahabad High Court against an order dated 28‑03‑2026 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge that denied him bail in a case under Section 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant had earlier been granted bail on 09‑03‑2026 by a …

SHUBHAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Shubham Yadav, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly threatening a 19‑year‑old woman with a false promise of marriage and attempting to coerce her. The FIR was lodged on 12 March 2026, but the appellant contended that …

SURAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Suraj filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1041 of 2020) arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 352 and the SC/ST Act, and also requested that his bail application be decided expeditiously. The …

HAKIM SINGHversusSTATE

The appellant Hakim Singh filed a criminal appeal against a judgment of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur, dated 09.10.1985. No counsel appeared for the appellant, while the State counsel was present. An office report dated 15.09.2026, received in compliance with a prior order, …

VEERU VISHWAKARMA @ VEER BAHADUR VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an appeal by Veeru Vishwakarma under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act seeking bail after a Special Judge had refused it. The FIR alleged that Vishwakarma fired at Deepak and Pankaj Sonkar, causing injuries, but …

SHUBHAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Shubham Yadav, was convicted under Sections 69, 89, 352, 351(3) of the IPC and several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly forcing a pregnancy termination and using caste slurs. He appealed the denial of bail by the …

SMT. KAMLESHversusSTATE

The appellant, Smt. Kamlesh, filed a criminal appeal (No. 2732 of 1987) against a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffar Nagar. While the appeal was pending, the court ordered a verification of the appellant’s living status. A report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 07‑09‑2026 …

SHIV NARAIN AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants were convicted for offences arising from a violent incident on 28 March 1986 in which the informant Kunjalwa alleged they assaulted him with lathis, fired guns, and caused multiple injuries. The trial court sentenced them under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 323 of the IPC, while one …

MISMETMMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Mismetmmar, Kazim Husain and Kaniz Begum filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1855 of 2019) filed under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498‑A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …

KANIJ BEGUM @ NAJMA AND 2 OTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Kanij Begum @ Najma, Kajim Hasain Kha and Darkasha filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 1855 of 2019 (Shahnazbano v. Mismetmmar) involving offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 498‑A …

KULDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kuldeep Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 23 June 2026 and to stay the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 10 of 2026 (Rekha Devi v. Kuldeep Singh) pending before the Special Judge, Pilibhit. The applicant argued that the injury …

RAM MILAN SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ram Milan Sharma and Ankush Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash and stay the criminal proceedings in Case No. 930 of 2026, which arose from a charge sheet under various provisions of the SC/ST Act. Although three counsel were listed for the …

NAVEEN @ BOBBY @ NAVEEN KUMAR JAIN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) against one applicant and a bailable warrant (BW) against two others, both dated 13‑05‑2026 and issued by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Firozabad in State v. Dashrath Sharma & others. …

RAMAKANT MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ramakant Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 17‑05‑2022 issued by the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 336, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that the complaint, filed …

DHARMENDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants Dharmendra and Kunti Devi filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the charge sheet and stay proceedings in a case filed under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC for alleged cheating. They argued that the offences under Sections 420 and 406 cannot coexist, …

ANKITA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ankita Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 22‑12‑2022 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur, in a criminal complaint (Case No. 3978 of 2017) filed by her husband Nitin Sharma alleging offences under various IPC …

RAMKAILASH YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ramkailash Yadav and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. The court examined whether the application was sufficiently pressed. It held that the application was not pressed and therefore …

HITLER SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 25.01.2023 and the cognizance order dated 01.03.2023 in a criminal case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shamli. The application was supported by counsel but no …

VIKRAM VIBHUTI SINGH MOURYA AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, a group of ten accused, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the charge‑sheet dated 11‑12‑2024 and a stay of the Special Judge’s proceedings in Special Session Trial No. 918 of 2026. They also prayed that the trial court expedite …

CHANDRASHEKHAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, a shop‑keeper, was named in an FIR alleging assault, molestation, offences under the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, the cognizance order and to stay the trial, claiming he was falsely implicated, …

NEERAJ JAUHARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Neeraj Jauhari filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a 27‑April‑2026 order of the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Agra, which had issued non‑bailable warrants against the accused in State v. Pooran (Session Case No. 1921 of 2022). The applicant argued that the order should be …

MUKESH KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 312 of 2025) arising from a FIR containing offences under Sections 147, 308, 427, 506, 323, 336 and 498‑A IPC. A compromise deed dated 26‑08‑2025 was filed and verified by …

XX JUVENILE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, two juveniles, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 08‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 62 of 2024, which was pending before the Juvenile Justice Board. The charge sheet arose from offences under Sections 147, …

PRIYA @ PINKI @ BANTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Priya (also known as Pinki and Banta) was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the murder of a six‑year‑old girl, based on a charge‑sheet that implicated her only during investigation, not in the FIR. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence such as …

SHANKAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants Shankar and Buddha filed a criminal appeal against their conviction in a Sessions Trial. No counsel appeared for the appellants before the High Court. The court noted that the appeal concerning Shankar was already abated by an order dated 18‑12‑2025. A report from the Chief Judicial …

JAYVEER SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP 3 ANOTHER

The applicants Jayveer Singh, Nanhu and Lal Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash an order dated 25‑11‑2025 in Session Trial Case No.850 of 2022 (Ramkumar v. Jayveer Singh), which involved charges under IPC sections 452, 354, 323, 504, 506, POCSO Act sections …

RAJ PAL SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 7126 of 2018, Crime No. 51 of 2019) arising under Sections 323, 504, 506, 406 and 342 of the IPC. The trial court had earlier ordered the parties to file a …

CHANDversusSTATE OF U. P.THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME GOV. OF U.P.

The applicants Chand, Mausin, Rashid and Mohd. Nazim filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 31.08.2021 passed by the Special Court under the POCSO Act and to stay further proceedings. The application was initially filed for Chand, and …

DHYANPAL AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Dhyanpal and six others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 354 of 2017, which involved offences under Sections 394, 397 and 427 of the IPC. The High Court had earlier directed the …

ARJUNversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Arjun applied for bail in a criminal case involving offences under sections 363, 368, 376(d)(a), 506 of the IPC and sections 5(g)/6 of the POCSO Act. This was his second bail application; the first was dismissed in July 2021. Counsel argued that the trial had already concluded, rendering the bail …

DILIPversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant, Dilip, filed a criminal appeal (No. 1781 of 2018) against the State of U.P. but failed to appear before the Allahabad High Court despite having three counsels on record. The court repeatedly listed the matter, directed notices to the appellant, and sought his willingness to be …

FAIZUL HASAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Faizul Hasan and Saiya Khatoon, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 12-10-2022 and the entire proceedings of a criminal complaint (Case No. 962 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 …

RAMESH VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ramesh Vishwakarma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 19‑09‑2022 and the cognizance and summoning order dated 29‑09‑2022 in a criminal case (Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC) pending before the Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) in Varanasi, …

NARSING GIRI ALIAS PAPPU GIRIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Narsing Giri, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an order dated 21‑08‑2023 of the Family Court, Ballia, which had issued recovery warrants under Section 128 CrPC for maintenance awarded to his daughter under Section 125 CrPC. The applicant argued that the …

PRAMOD GIRIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pramod Giri, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 5843 of 2019) pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Meerut, and to stay the summoning order dated 16‑02‑2021. The court noted that no …

ASHISH B EGVERTversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ashish B Egvert filed a second criminal bail application (No. 24157 of 2024) in the Allahabad High Court seeking release on bail in a trial (Session Trial No. 780 of 2023) involving offences under sections 328, 376, 504, 507 IPC and section 67-A of the Income Tax Act. The first bail application had …

LALU TIWARI ALIAS KAMLAKANT AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The appellants Lalu Tiwari alias Kamlakant and three others filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under IPC sections 323, 354, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d)(dha). The trial …

RASHID KHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance, summoning order and charge sheet in a case under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention) Act, alleging that the dispute had been amicably settled by a …

OM PRAKASH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The revisionist, Om Prakash Singh, was convicted under Sections 7 and 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act for selling adulterated 'besan ke laddu' and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment with a fine. He filed a criminal revision in 2014, not contesting the conviction but seeking to …

RAJ KUMAR @ RAJU KAUSHIKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Raj Kumar, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to set aside a bail order dated 26‑11‑2025 passed by the Special Judge, Hathras. The appeal arose from a case involving multiple offences under the SC/ST Act and the Arms …

PRASHANT SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 21‑10‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 06‑12‑2024 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Delhi Police …

VIBHAS CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vibhas Chandra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order dated 12‑02‑2019 and the charge‑sheet in a criminal case (Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC) pending before the ACJM‑II, Prayagraj. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation Centre, where …

ANKIT KUMAR SAHU AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, a group of ten individuals, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 02‑03‑2022 and the related criminal proceedings (Case Crime No. 331 of 2021) instituted under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 342 and sections …

AMIR HASANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Amir Hasan appealed against the denial of bail in a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, where the victim, an 18‑year‑old woman, alleged that he had threatened and raped her. The appellant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the …

RAHUL KHEWRA AND 3 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash charge sheet No.66/2024 and related proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the …

ABHISHEK AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑05‑2023 and the summons dated 14‑08‑2024 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

MOHD SARWAR HUSSAIN @ SHERU AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 07‑09‑2021 in a criminal case (Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act) pending before the Judicial Magistrate in …

DALCHINI AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants Dalchini and Munnilal filed a criminal appeal (No. 3242 of 1985) against a judgment of the Special Judge under the EC Act, Banda, concerning offences under Sections 323, 325 and 452 of the IPC. No counsel appeared for the appellants, while the State was represented by A.G.A. Ajay …

NITESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Nitesh Sharma appealed against an order of the Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act seeking bail. The FIR named only Babloo Sharma; the appellant was implicated solely through a confessional statement of the co‑accused and no …

DHARMENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Dharmendra filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, and also requested a stay of further …

PARMATMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Parmatma, Gunjeshwar and Krishna filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑10‑2025, the cognizance order dated 27‑10‑2025, and the entire Special Session Trial No. 2258 of 2025 arising under various provisions of the SC/ST Act. The …

RAM BABU AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants Ram Babu and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet issued by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act and related provisions of the SC/ST Act, and to stay the ongoing trial. The State filed a …

ANIL KUMAR YADAV @ SUGANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and summoning order in a criminal case arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act. The …

ANUBHAV MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anubhav Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 19‑07‑2024 and the charge‑sheet No. 254/2023 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Scheduled Castes …

FAIZ @ SHAHFAIZversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Faiz @ Shahfaiz, appealed against the order denying bail in a murder case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC provisions. The FIR alleged that the deceased was assaulted and killed by a group of accused, including the appellant. The defence …

SHRIKANT LODHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Shrikant Lodhi, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to set aside a bail denial order dated 19 January 2026 and to obtain bail in a case involving multiple offences including assault and …

NARENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No. 31/2019) that alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 504, 506, 354 and Section 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST Act. A compromise deed dated 27‑03‑2025 had been …

DEVENDRA SINGH VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Devendra Singh Verma, appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to set aside a Special Judge's order denying bail in a case involving alleged caste‑related abuse, cheating, and forgery. The FIR alleged that the …

PRINCE PARMAR @ VIKAS PARMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Prince Parmar @ Vikas Parmar and Ritik, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a direction that the trial court not admit a certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act in the pending criminal case (State of U.P. v. Prince Parmar …

ANAND RAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Anand Raj Singh appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to set aside an order that rejected his anticipatory bail in a case involving multiple IPC offences and a provision of the SC/ST Act. The appeal listed two counsels for the …

PINTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pintu, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant issued against him in a 2004 case (State vs. Sunil & Another) involving offences under IPC Sections 498 and 376 and Section 3(1) of …

MOHAMMAD SADDAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mohammad Saddam filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 07‑04‑2026, a subsequent order dismissing his recall application, and the entire criminal proceeding arising from a 2019 case under IPC sections 363, …

RAJPAL SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 31‑12‑2014 and the related proceedings in a case under Section 308 IPC, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled by compromise. The trial court had verified the …

KAPIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kapil Kumar appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to quash an order dated 06.12.2024 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (P.A.) in Bijnor, which had framed charges under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 BNS and 3(1)5‑Ka of the …

RAHUL YADAV AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and all proceedings in Criminal Case No. 659 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was …

KETAN PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Ketan Patel, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, challenging a bail order dated 03‑04‑2026 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Jhansi. The appeal arose from a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 442 …

REENA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Reena Devi filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge-sheet and summoning order in a case under various sections of the B.N.S. and the SC/ST Act. During hearing, counsel for the applicant withdrew the request to …

SANTOSH SAINIversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

Santosh Saini appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to quash a Special Judge's order rejecting his anticipatory bail application in a case involving offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The appeal was listed, but no …

YOGENDRA SINGH ALIAS HANDRE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC and Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a Special Session Trial (No. 55 of 2023) arising from a complaint under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and the SC/ST Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably …

RAJENDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Rajendra and Aslam filed an application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. and Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 96 of 2024 (Ram Prasad v. Rajendra) filed under Sections 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(VA) of the SC/ST Act. The application also …

ANIL KUMAR BARANWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a summoning order dated 07.03.2025 in a complaint case arising from an FIR lodged on 07.07.2022 under IPC sections 323, 427, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(da). They alleged that the prosecution case was …

JITENDRA KUSHWAHAversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jitendra Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 7 February 2024 issued by the Civil Judge (Offence Against Women) in a criminal case involving allegations under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 …

VIJAY SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 8 February 2023 and the related criminal proceedings (Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act) pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Mainpuri. The …

ABHAY MISHRA AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 36208 of 2024) arising from a dowry-related complaint under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Court’s …

DINESH ALIAS VINOD KUMAR AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 427 of 2022) filed under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation Centre, where the parties amicably settled the dispute …

MANOJ MAHESHWARI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash and stay the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 22 of 2024 (Rammoorat v. Manoj Maheshwari et al.) which involved charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and the SC/ST Act. During arguments the counsel for the …

VINOD KUMAR VERMA ALIAS VINOD KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Vinod Kumar Verma and another against the State of U.P. and another. The counsel for the applicants, Babu Lal Ram, Kamalesh Kumar Nishad, Om Prakash Singh, and Renu Singh, were listed, but none appeared before the court on …

SAROJ RATHOREversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Saroj Rathore, was charged with murdering a young woman by hanging her after she returned from her marriage, as alleged in an FIR filed by her father. The appellant sought bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, claiming …

RISHIPAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants Rishipal and Ram Bharosey filed a criminal appeal (No. 520 of 1986) against a judgment dated 30 January 1986 passed by the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Budaun, under IPC Sections 324, 323 and 34. The appeal was pending for many years when a report dated 24 April 2026 indicated that …

SALMAN KHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Salman Khan, Gulshan Khan, Irfan Khan and Nikhat Khan filed a Section 482 application seeking to quash the charge sheet and summons in a criminal case alleging dowry harassment, cruelty and assault under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women …

VIMAL KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants Vimal Kumar and Ramsajivan appealed against an order of the Special Judge granting anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 304 and 328 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellants sought to set aside the order and also requested …

YOGENDRA ALIAS YOGENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Yogendra Singh filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 289 of 2023) arising from an FIR lodged on 24-10-2022 alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust in relation to a tractor rented in 2011. The charge sheet under Section 406 …

SURJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Surjeet Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order dated 23‑01‑2025 and stay the cyber‑fraud trial (Case No. 25 of 2025) in which he was named as an accused. He contended that he was never mentioned in the FIR and was implicated only because his …

MOHD. WAHID KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mohd. Wahid Khan filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 30.11.2023 in a complaint case involving alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant …

VIJENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Vijendra Singh and Anjali, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their married life and to provide them protection, alleging that the father of the wife was harassing them. The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s decision …

SMT. DEEPIKA VERMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Deepika Verma and Amit Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to restrain the State of U.P. and two other respondents from interfering in their married life, raiding their house, and threatening them. The respondents' standing counsel informed the court that the first …

PHULGAIN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The State filed a criminal complaint (CC No. 5390 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 500, 501 and 384 IPC arising from a land‑mutation dispute. The civil judge, however, issued a summoning order on 10‑11‑2022 charging the four applicants with offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 IPC, …

SMT. NEELAM @ ANSHU AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A complaint dated 01‑12‑2021 was filed by Naresh Kumar (the husband) against his wife Neelam @ Anshu and her family members under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC alleging theft of jewellery and marital discord. The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash the summoning …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Vinod Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 33586 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court seeking release from custody pending trial. The State of Uttar Pradesh opposed the bail. The court examined the application and, referencing a prior order in a similar bail …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Vinod Kumar, an accused in a large economic‑offence case involving alleged fraud under the Companies Act, RBI Act, Prize Chits Act and several IPC sections, has been in judicial custody since June 2019. The charge sheet has not yet been framed due to the non‑appearance of numerous co‑accused lodged …

NARINDER SINGH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Narinder Singh Chauhan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet and summons issued against him in a cyber‑extortion case. The FIR, lodged by Glenda Roleen Fernandes, detailed a scheme involving …

RAVINDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ravindra Kumar and his son Asmit Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 940 of 2025 arising from FIR 09/2025 under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities …

ARVIND KUMAR DWIVEDI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Arvind Kumar Dwivedi, Anjali Kumari and Anand Kumar filed an application under Section 528 BNSS and Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and summons issued in a case under the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. They argued that the …

PUNEET KISHORE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Puneet Kishore and Saroj Gupta, filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to enforce a Supreme Court order dated 03‑08‑2001 in Transfer Petition (C) No.260 of 2000, which had resulted in a compromise and a divorce decree, and to stay a criminal case (Case No. 417 of 2021) under …

RISHIPAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Rishipal, Bholambar and Rohit filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings arising from a charge‑sheet filed for offences under Sections 452, 323, 354, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(5A) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The …

PREM SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Prem Singh and Vinod Singh filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the cognizance and summons issued by the Special Judge under the SC/ST Act and several IPC offences. The FIR alleged that the accused, while intoxicated, entered the complainant's house, assaulted …

PRABHAT PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Prabhat Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the charge-sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under various provisions of the SC/ST Act and other offences. He alleged false implication, lack of credible evidence, and unfair investigation. …

RAVINDER MEHTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ravinder Mehta, an Assistant Inspector General of Registration/Assistant Commissioner of Stamp in Shamli, was arrested after a trap operation alleged that he demanded and accepted a bribe of Rs.1,00,000 to settle a stamp duty deficiency. The bail application was filed under Section …

STATE OF U.P.versusRAM BEHARI

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed the trial court’s order acquitting Ram Behari of offences under Section 25 of the Arms Act read with Section 14 of the Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas Act, 1983. The prosecution alleged that the accused was found in possession of live cartridges without a …

RAHUL KUMAR SAHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Rahul Kumar Sahu filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging three orders: the Additional Session Judge's dismissal of his criminal revision, the Chief Judicial Magistrate's rejection of Exhibit No. 21B, and the summoning of the petitioner under Section 138 of the …

PHOOL CHANDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Phool Chandra Yadav filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking to set aside a judgment of the Sessions Judge dated 11 February 2026 in a criminal appeal under section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and an order of the Gram Nyayalaya dated 9 July …

RICHCREDIT FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITEDversusBABITA @ BABITA GUPTA

Richcredit Finance Private Limited filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Special Court (N.I. Act), Ghaziabad, to dispose of a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed on 17‑08‑2023. The petitioner argued that the trial …

RICHCREDIT FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITEDversusRAJESH KUMAR GUPTA

Richcredit Finance Private Limited filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Special Court (N.I. Act) in Ghaziabad to decide a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act within a specified period. The petitioner argued that the trial court was merely …

RICHCREDIT FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITEDversusRISHABH GUPTA

Richcredit Finance Private Limited filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Special Court (N.I. Act), Ghaziabad, to dispose of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed on 17-08-2023. The petitioner argued that the trial court was …

HAR DATTA MISHRAversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Har Datta Mishra filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge-sheet dated 13-11-2025 and related proceedings in a criminal case involving Sections 409, 120-B IPC and Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant later informed the …

SMT RAJVANTI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt Rajvanti Devi, filed a transfer application under Section 447 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal trial (Session Trial No. 507 of 2019) from the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.5, Varanasi to another Sessions Court in Varanasi and also requested a stay of …

ARCHNA SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusKAMAL TOMAR

The petitioners, Archna Sharma and Pradeep Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking to set aside orders dated 25.08.2022 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and 23.01.2026 of the Additional Session Judge in criminal matters under Sections 323, 504, and 506 …

SMT. AASTHA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY HOME AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt. Aastha Sharma, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (State Vs Prashant Kaushik and others) from the ACJM Court‑5 in Ghaziabad to the District Court in Meerut and to stay the proceedings. The application was …

SURAJ CHANU CHOURASIYA @ SURAJ CHOURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Suraj Chou​rasiya, filed a Cr.P.C. Section 482 application seeking to quash the criminal complaint (case 117 of 2018) filed under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 3/4, on the ground that the parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise which was verified by the …

AKHATARI BEGAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akhatari Begam, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a domestic violence case (case No. 415 of 2019) from the Judicial Magistrate Court in Jalaun to another district court and also requested a stay of proceedings. No counsel …

RASHID ANWARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rashid Anwar, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (S.T. No. 226 of 2020) to another Sessions Division and to stay the proceedings. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, and …

SMT NEELAMversusSTATE OF U.P. NAD 5 OTHERS

Smt Neelam filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (State vs Indrapal & others) from Hasanpur, Amroha to Moradabad. The application required service of notice on opposite parties, but the court’s office report indicated that no …

ANKITA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ankita Singh filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (Cr.No. 17114 of 2023) from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur to Ballia, alleging that staying in Ghazipur would cause her irreparable loss. The application listed several …

SMT. TANMAYEE RAGHUVANSHIversusSHUBHAM SINGH

The applicant, Smt. Tanmayee Raghuvanshi, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (Case No. 172/2023) from the District and Sessions Judge, Jaunpur to the District and Sessions Judge, Varanasi, alleging potential irreparable loss …

SMT. PINKI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Smt. Pinki Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act from the Judicial Magistrate, Bhoganipur, Kanpur Dehat to another district, …

SMT. PINKI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt. Pinki Devi, filed a criminal transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a domestic violence case (Case No. 121 of 2020) from the Judicial Magistrate Court, Bhoganipur, Kanpur Dehat to the District Court, Fatehpur, invoking Section 12 of …

AEYSHA BEGAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aeysha Begam, filed a criminal transfer application (No. 634 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the trial. Counsel for the applicant, Om Prakash and Shrikrishna, appeared along with counsel for the State and another respondent. During the hearing, the …

SURENDRA RAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Surendra Ray filed a transfer application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a family court case (No. 1022 of 2021) from Varanasi to the District Court, Ghazipur. The High Court directed the applicant to deposit Rs. 25,000 in the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, but …

ANUJ RASTOGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anuj Rastogi, filed a criminal transfer application (No. 796 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. Although three counsels were listed for the applicant, none appeared to press the application. The matter had earlier been referred to the court's Mediation and Conciliation Centre, …

RAM NAZAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ram Nazar Dubey filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The applicant was represented by Senior Advocate Indra Jit Singh, while the opposite side was represented by G.A. The …

HARI SHANKAR SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA

The Allahabad High Court heard three bail applications filed by Hari Shankar Sharma, Deepak Jain and Sushant Goyal, all accused in a GST fraud case (Case No.1057/2025) involving alleged creation of fictitious input tax credit under Sections 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c) and 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act, 2017. …

DEEPAK JAINversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

Deepak Jain filed Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 45969 of 2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, seeking release on bail against the Union of India and another party. The application was listed before Hon'ble Justice Samit Gopal. After consideration, the Court rejected …

NIRIKSHAK RAMESH SINGH SIDDHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. by Sub‑Inspector Nirikshak Ramesh Singh Siddhu, who was arrested for allegedly receiving a bribe of Rs.3,87,000 hidden in his police vehicle. The applicant contended that the money recovered was his own cash …

PRASHANT SHUKLA @ DABBUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Prashant Shukla, filed a second bail application after being in custody since July 2020, claiming a delay of nearly six years in his trial. The prosecution indicated that 35 witnesses remain to be examined, with the 19th witness still being recorded as of September 2025, suggesting …

RAJESH CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rajesh Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, seeking protection from arrest in a pending criminal proceeding. The High Court examined the application and found that the applicant had not satisfied the criteria for anticipatory bail. Consequently, …

SHUBHAM SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Three police personnel—Shubham Srivastava, Rajesh Chaudhary and Praveen Kumar—filed anticipatory bail applications under CrPC Section 482 in connection with FIR No. 162 of 2025 alleging extortion, threats and illegal collection of money under IPC Sections 308(6), 140(2), 351(3), 61(2) and the …

PRAVEEN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Praveen Kumar under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant sought protection from arrest pending investigation. The court examined the application and found that the applicant did not satisfy the …

ANUJ KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anuj Kumar Singh, filed a transfer application under Section 447 of the BNSS, 2023 seeking to move a maintenance suit (Case No.271 of 2025) from the Family Court at Bhadohi to a court in Prayagraj, alleging that the trial court was biased because the opposite party’s father and cousin …

ASHA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, in matter No. 1923 of 2026, issued procedural directions in the petition filed by Asha Devi against the State of U.P. and two others. The court ordered that notice be issued to respondents numbered 4 to 6. The respondents were directed to comply with …

BABULAL PANIKAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Babulal Panika, accused of dowry‑related offences under Sections 82 and 80(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, in connection with the death of his wife. The applicant claimed the death was a suicide, citing …

MANJEET KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Manjeet Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons, charge sheet and trial proceedings in a corruption case under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, arising from a police trap in which cash was recovered from him. He contended that …

SHARIK KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 15 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sharik Khan, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside the discharge orders dated 09.11.2022 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate and 26.09.2025 by the Additional Sessions Judge in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The …