Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SANDEEP V MARNE

118 judgments · newest first · showing 1–118

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR PUNE MAHANAGAR PARIVAHAN LTDversusMANOHAR UDAYBHAN SIRSAT

Rejected

The Managing Director of Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Ltd filed a writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's order that reinstated the respondent, Manohar Udaybhan Sirsat, with continuity but without back wages. The Labour Court had earlier found the inquiry into the respondent's dismissal fair on …

BOMBAY MOTHERS AND CHILDREN WELFARE SOCIETY,versusYESHWANT MARUTI BHANDARE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay Mothers and Children Welfare Society (NGO) was ordered by the Labour Court to pay wages to three project‑specific employees for the period March 1997 to November 1998 under Section 33‑C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The employees’ termination complaint was later dismissed and a …

CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS and ANR.versusKISAN AMDA GAWIT

Disposed Off

The Conservator of Forests filed a writ petition challenging an Industrial Court order that regularised Kisan Amda Gavit in Group‑D service from 1 December 2001. The High Court admitted the petition and stayed the order. Later, a communication revealed that a Government Resolution dated 16 October …

KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LTD.versusVIJAY BABANRAO DALAVI and ANR.

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court heard cross‑petitions filed by Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. and its workmen challenging a Labour Court award that ordered reinstatement of six binders with 75% backwages after their retrenchment in 1991. The employer argued that the retrenchment complied with Section 25‑F of the …

KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LTD. and ANR.versusSUDHAKAR MURLIDHAR BRAHME and ANR.

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court heard cross‑petitions filed by Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. and its workmen challenging a Labour Court award that ordered reinstatement of six binders with 75% backwages after their retrenchment in 1991. The employer argued that the retrenchment complied with Section 25‑F of the …

KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LTD. and ANR.versusBHASKAR VASUDEO TANDALE and ANR.

Disposed Off

Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. retrenched six workmen from its Binding Department in 1991, citing heavy losses and closure of that unit. The employees challenged the retrenchment before the Labour Court, which ordered reinstatement with continuity of service and 75% backwages. Kirloskar appealed, arguing …

BHASKAR VASUDEO TANDALEversusKIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LTD. and ANR.

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court heard cross‑petitions filed by Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. and its workmen challenging a Labour Court award that ordered reinstatement of six binders with 75% backwages after their retrenchment in 1991. The employer argued that the retrenchment complied with Section 25‑F of the …

MR.ASHOK SHETTY AND ORSversusMR. DNYANESHWAR B. KHANDGE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged the Secretary (Co‑operation)'s order reviving the registration of a cooperative society (Respondent No.5) that had been set aside by the Divisional Joint Registrar on grounds of fraudulent formation. The petitioners, part of a larger group of 33 members denied plot …

YAZAKI INDIA EMPLOYEES UNIONversusYAZAKI INDIA LTD.

Dismissed

The Yazaki India Employees Union filed a writ petition challenging a Labour Court order that rejected its application under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act for recovery of amounts due under a settlement dated 20 January 2004. The dispute centered on whether the settlement applied to …

PRALAHAD LAXIMAN SHINDEversusSHRI. VASANT VITTHAL NATURE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged the Labour Court's orders that reinstated them after alleging unfair labour practices, contending that they were terminated despite continuous service since 1987. The Labour Court held that the petitioners were directly employed by the Executive Engineer, ignoring evidence …

SHILA SANJIV PADHYE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 6530 of 2026) challenging an order dated 1 July 2026, which had already been disposed of by a revision application. They argued that a fresh petition had been filed, rendering the present petition without any surviving issues. The Court held that, since the …

AJIT NARAYAN JAKHADIversusMAINAK MAHENDRA MASHURWALA

Disposed Off

Ajit Narayan Jakhade filed a contempt petition against Mainak Mahendra Mashruwala and others, alleging breach of an order of the City Civil Court. The High Court examined whether there was a deliberate violation of the lower court's order and considered subsequent events that might affect the …

VASANTI MADHAV PUJARI AND ANRversusSHILA SANJIV PADHYE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 6530 of 2026) challenging an order dated 1 July 2026, after a revision application (No. 143 of 2026) had been disposed. They subsequently filed a fresh petition, rendering the present petition moot. The Court held that, since the issues were now being …

SHRI. HIMANT GENBA KHOMNEversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUNE IRRIGATION DIVISION

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged the Labour Court's orders that reinstated them after alleging unfair labour practices, contending that they were terminated despite continuous service since 1987. The Labour Court held that the petitioners were directly employed by the Executive Engineer, ignoring evidence …

ANANTA RAJARAM WALUNJversusGRUPO ANTOLIN PUNE (P) LTD

Partly Allowed

The petitioner, a factory employee, was dismissed for allegedly claiming excess transport allowance by inflating the distance between his home and the company warehouse. The employer’s enquiry found the charges proved and dismissed him, leading to a reference before the Industrial Tribunal under …

M/S. HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD.versusMR. BHASKAR MURLIDHAR KADAM

Disposed Off

The petition filed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited challenged the reduction of gratuity payable to former employee Bhaskar Murlidhar Kadam, who had been dismissed for alleged fraud and falsification of records. The Controlling Authority had awarded Rs 3,50,000 as gratuity, which the Appellate …

MRS. SHOBHNA RAJENDRA SHAHversusJANAKALYAN SAHAKARI BANK LTD.

Disposed Off

In a writ petition filed by Jankalyan Sahakari Bank Ltd. against the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai and others, an interim application (IA No. 5209 of 2026) sought directions for the speedy disposal of Objection Application No. 1/2013 within six weeks. The bank, …

CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND ANR.versusDEVIDAS GOVIND BHUSARE

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Conservator of Forests and others, challenged a 2001 order of the Industrial Court concerning Devidas Govind Bhusare. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the respondent had already been appointed as a Group D Van Majur effective 1 June 2012, as per an order dated 24 May 2013. …

WALCHANDNAGAR INDUSTRIES LTD.versusH.R.KAMBLE and ORS.

Allowed

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Ltd., challenged the Labour Court and Industrial Court orders that reinstated a workman (Respondent No.1) after finding him guilty of theft. The lower courts had justified reinstatement by considering the low monetary value of the stolen item (Rs. 40‑100). …

ED COOPER PREMISES CO OP. SOC. LTDversusDIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR AND ORS

Rejected

The petition challenged the order of the Divisional Joint Registrar dismissing a revision of an application for transmission of membership in a co‑operative society. Respondent No. 3 sought membership of Gala No. 37 after his father’s death, produced NOCs from his siblings, but one brother later …

ANGAD TRIMBAKRAO NALAWADEversusM/S S R TRANSPORT

Disposed Off

The High Court examined a writ petition challenging a Labour Court award that ordered the reinstatement of an employee with 50% back wages after finding an employer‑employee relationship and illegal termination. The petitioners had already deposited the awarded amount of Rs 1,28,800, which the Court …

BRAMHA DEV VASHISHT RAIversusASIAN CABLES and INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Mr. Brahma Dev Vashist Rai, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. No counsel appeared on his behalf on 3 July 2026, and the court listed the petition for dismissal on 10 July 2026. The petitioner again failed to appear on the subsequent date, indicating a loss of …

MUTUAL AUTOMOTIVE PVT LTDversusREGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Disposed Off

Mutul Automotive Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice issued by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) for Rs 1,73,39,748 under a Section 7A order dated 18 September 2023 of the Employees' Provident Fund Act. The company had also filed an appeal under Section 7I and …

GANESH KRISHNAJI VAZEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner challenged the de‑registration of a cooperative society, contending that the number of genuine signatures on the registration proposal satisfied the statutory requirement. The High Court observed that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing a revision under Section 154 of …

MOHANBHAI KHANCHANDANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Mohanbhai Khanchandani, challenged the rejection of his application for membership in a cooperative society under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960, asserting that he had acquired ownership of Flat No. B‑3 through an agreement dated 17 September 2001. …

MOHAN KHANCHANDANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Mohanbhai Khanchandani, challenged the rejection of his application for membership in a cooperative society under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960, asserting that he had purchased Flat No. B‑3 through an agreement dated 17 September 2001. The …

DGP Hinoday Industries LtdversusHirabai Popat Patil

Disposed Off

The petitioner, DGP Hinoday Industries Limited (now CIE Automotive India Limited), filed a writ petition against Hirabai Popat Patil in the Bombay High Court. The petition sought relief on unspecified grounds. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. D.J. Bhanage, applied to the Court for permission to …

SHAIKH JAVID SHEIKH RASHIDversusRAVINDRA PANCHFULA SHESHRAO JADHAV

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed four separate contempt petitions (Nos.51, 54, 57 and 67 of 2026) arising from writ petitions (Nos.7951, 7949, 8004 and 7954 of 2025) against respondent Ravindra Panchfula Sheshrao Jadhav. The petitioners’ counsel submitted that the orders of the Court had been fully complied …

MANAGER THE POONA CLUB LTD.versusGANESH SOPAN KAMBLE

Allowed

The Poona Club terminated waiter Ganesh Sopan Kamble after a domestic enquiry based on two chargesheets alleging multiple instances of misconduct in November‑December 2015. The Labour Court held the enquiry fair but declared the enquiry officer’s findings perverse, finding no evidence of misconduct. …

ANITA TUKARAM WADHAWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Anita Tukaram Wadhawal, challenged an order of the Industrial Court that remanded a Labour Court decision declaring her a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act and ordering her reinstatement with back wages. The Industrial Court had set aside the Labour Court's judgment, …

DR. LALCHANDRA BADRIPRASAD TIWARIversusRAGHULEELA MEGAMALL KANDIVALI (WEST)

Disposed Off

The cooperative society Raghuleela Megamall filed a writ petition challenging the Deputy Registrar’s order dated 2 March 2019 that appointed an enquiry officer under Section 83 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960, on the basis of a complaint by a single member, Mr. L.B. Tiwari. The …

MAHESH MADHUKAR BHARTIYAversusDIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR CO OP. MUMBAI AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioner, a member and former managing‑committee member of Lok Nisarg Co‑operative Housing Society, claimed the society failed to furnish a CD/video recording of the Special General Meeting (May 2023) and the Annual General Meeting (Sept 2023) despite his written complaints. Relying on …

PRAGATI VITTHAL GAWANDEversusTHE PRINCIPAL K M S EDUCATION AND ORS

Disposed Off

Pragati Vitthal Gawande, a former Shikshan Sevak, challenged her termination, arguing she had completed the required 30 months of service and was therefore a deemed confirmed teacher under Section 5(2A) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The …

SPARTAN ELECTRICALSversusMUMBAI SHRAMIK SANGH

Disposed Off

Spartan Electricals and Mumbai Shramik Sangh were involved in two writ petitions concerning a labour dispute. The parties reached an amicable settlement, with the employer handing over a cheque of Rs. 8,00,000 to the workman as full and final settlement. The workman personally appeared before the …

KALWA CO-OP. HOUSING SOC. LTD.versusSAGARDEEP CO-OP. HSG. SOC. AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Kalwa Co-Op Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order of the executing court that allowed the respondent society to amend its Darkhast to include an additional mode of execution. The petitioner contended that the execution proceedings were not maintainable …

ASIF KAPADIAversusBHARAT CO OP. CREDIT SOC. LTD AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Asif Kapadia, filed a writ petition (No. 17207 of 2025) in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against Bharat Co-op. Credit Soc. Ltd and others. During the proceedings, a remand order was passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar. On instructions, the petitioner's counsel applied for …

HARI KARAMSHI THAKKARversusSUNIL NARAINDAS KARIA

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Hari Karamshi Thakkar, filed a review petition (No. 79 of 2026) seeking relief from the earlier order in Writ Petition No. 2478 of 2025. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Krishna Shukla, on instructions, applied to the Court for permission to withdraw the review petition. The Court …

BANK OF INDIAversusSHARAD RAJARAM KHADTARE

Allowed

The Bank of India dismissed clerk Sharad Rajaram Khadtare in October 2000 for alleged misappropriation of customers' funds after a domestic enquiry. Thirteen years later, the employee sought reinstatement, leading the Government to refer the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal, which, unable to …

ASIF KAPADIAversusBHARAT CO OP. CREDIT SOC. LTD AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Asif Kapadia, filed a writ petition (No. 17207 of 2025) in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against Bharat Co-op. Credit Soc. Ltd and others. During the proceedings, a remand order was passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar. On instructions, the petitioner's counsel applied for …

VASANT HIRU RASAL AND ORSversusTHE DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER THANE AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the authorization granted to Respondent No.6 by Respondent No.5 (a society) to vote in the society's elections, alleging that Respondent No.6 was a defaulter of Rs.97,00,000. Examination of the society's records revealed that only Rs.15,00,000 was outstanding, which …

CEAT LTD.versusDAYARAM K. YADAV and ORS.

Disposed Off

Ceat Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging orders of the Labour and Industrial Courts concerning compensation to the legal heirs of a deceased employee, Dayaram K. Yadav. The parties negotiated an amicable settlement whereby Ceat Ltd. agreed to pay a lump‑sum sum of Rs.10,00,000 to the widow, Smt. …

MADHAVI VILAS GOSALVIversusRAJESH MISHRA

Allowed

The Padmavati Nagar Co‑operative Housing Society resolved to terminate its developer and, during a special meeting of its Managing Committee on 15 April 2026, passed a no‑confidence motion against its Chairman (Petitioner No.2). The motion was adopted by six votes out of nine members present, and …

MR. ZAHIR NAZIR SHAIKH AND ANRversusAMIR NAZIR SHAIKH AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Zahir Nazir Shaikh and others, filed writ petitions challenging the City Civil Court's order dismissing their applications for chamber summons to be impleaded as defendants in suits filed by the respondents. The suits allege that the petitioners illegally constructed additional …

ZAHIR NAZIR SHAIKH AND ANRversusAMIR NAZIR SHAIKH AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Zahir Nazir Shaikh and others, filed writ petitions challenging the City Civil Court's order dismissing their applications for chamber summons to be impleaded as defendants in suits filed by the respondents. The suits allege that the petitioners illegally constructed additional …

MR. ZAHIR NAZIR SHAIKH AND ANRversusAMIR NAZIR SHAIKH AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Zahir Nazir Shaikh and others, filed writ petitions challenging the City Civil Court's order dismissing their applications for chamber summons to be impleaded as defendants in suits filed by the respondents. The suits allege that the petitioners illegally constructed additional …

ARJUN LALCHAND VISHWAKARMA AND ORSversusTILAK KHETSHI SHAH AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners Arjun Lalchand Vishwakarma and others filed a writ petition challenging the execution of a decree concerning possession of suit premises. The respondents, Tilak Khetshi Shah and others, contended that the decree had already been executed and possession was in the hands of the …

SUKRI CHANGU BHASMAversusMAHADU DAMA VARGADA (DECEASED)

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed an interim application to bring on record the legal heirs of Respondent No.1, who died during the pendency of the writ petition. The application was unopposed by the counsel appearing for the deceased respondent. The court allowed the application, permitting the legal heirs to …

CHANDRASHEKHAR KALURAM SAWANTversusARVIND SATISHCHANDRA SAWANT AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Chandrashekhare Kaluram Sawant, challenged a Small Causes Court order dated 8 September 2025 that rejected his application to extend the time for depositing interim compensation, a period originally fixed by a High Court order on 16 September 2016. The High Court noted that the …

MRS. MANDA KESHAV APTE (SINCE DECEASED)versusMR. MOHAN GOPAL RANE

Disposed Off

The High Court entertained three civil applications seeking to record the legal heirs of a deceased revision applicant and the legal representatives of a sole respondent, and allowed them, directing necessary amendments within three weeks. All three applications were subsequently disposed. In a …

VARSHA NARANDAS SEJPALversusM/S. NEW DHOLERA SHIPPING AND TRADING CO. LTD AND ORS

Disposed Off

The High Court examined multiple writ petitions filed by obstructionists (unit owners) and decree‑holders concerning the execution of a 2014 eviction decree in a lease‑dispute. The lease, though intended for 99 years, was treated as a monthly lease under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, …

VISHAL NARANDAS SEJPALversusM/S NEW DHOLERA SHIPPING AND TRADING CO.LTD.

Disposed Off

The High Court examined multiple writ petitions filed by obstructionists (unit owners) and decree‑holders concerning the execution of a 2014 eviction decree in a lease‑dispute. The lease, though intended for 99 years, was treated as a monthly lease under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, …

MAHESH DAMODAR PARIKHversusM/S NEW DHOLERA SHIPPING AND TRADING CO. LTD.

Disposed Off

The High Court examined multiple writ petitions filed by obstructionists (unit owners) and decree‑holders concerning the execution of a 2014 eviction decree in a lease‑dispute. The lease, though intended for 99 years, was treated as a monthly lease under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, …

M/S. SHARAD TRADING COversusM/S. NEW DHOLERA SHIPPING AND TRADING CO LTD AND ORS

Disposed Off

The High Court examined multiple writ petitions filed by obstructionists (unit owners) and decree‑holders concerning the execution of a 2014 eviction decree in a lease‑dispute. The lease, though intended for 99 years, was treated as a monthly lease under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTDversusCAMBATA TRUST AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged a Small Causes Court order that permitted amendment of the plaint to include a claim for Rs.1.50 crore spent on repairs and refurbishment of the suit premises. The High Court observed that the trial court had only allowed the amendment and …

NEW DHOLERA SHIPPING AND TRADING CO LTDversusSHARAD TRADING CO AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court modified orders of the Small Causes Court Appellate Bench concerning interim compensation payable by obstructionists who occupied units in a building constructed on a 99‑year lease that was not registered. The lease was treated as a monthly tenancy under Section 106 of the …

M/S. NEW DHOLERA SHIPPING AND TRADING CO LTDversusVISHAL NARANDAS SEJPAL AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court modified orders of the Small Causes Court Appellate Bench concerning interim compensation payable by obstructionists who occupied units in a building constructed on a 99‑year lease that was not registered. The lease was treated as a monthly tenancy under Section 106 of the …

RIYAZ SAJJAN AND ANRversusJEHANGIR DINSHAW IRANI AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a review petition challenging the High Court's order dated 27 March 2026 in Writ Petition No. 15677 of 2025. The Court noted that the review was filed through counsel who had not argued the original petition, a practice the Supreme Court has discouraged. The petitioners also …

SMT. SHAKUNTALA RAJNIKANT GADKAR AND ORSversusMAHENDRA PRASAD BAROT AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants, Smt. Shakuntala Rajnikant Gadkar and others, filed a civil revision application seeking relief against the respondents. The parties subsequently reached a settlement whereby the applicants would withdraw the entire amount deposited with the court along with accrued interest. The …

SHRI NARESH THAKURDAS WADHWANIversusM/S M.B/M DEVELOPERS AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Shri Naresh Thakurdas Wadhwani, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Ronak M. Utagikar, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the request and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. No substantive issues were adjudicated. …

THE TRUSTEES OF THE PARSI PUNCHAYAT AND ORSversusLALITA KUMAR SHAH AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Trustees of the Parsi Punchayat Funds, challenged an order of the Executing Court dated 19 August 2025 concerning Obstructionist Notice No.61 of 2008. The petition relied on an affidavit by an obstructionist who claimed tenancy rights under the Rent Statute and on the precedent set …

PRAKASH CHIMANLAL SHETHversusPRATIK CHANDRAKANT SHAH

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged the City Civil Court’s orders allowing the defendants to file delayed replies to summons for judgment in summary suits, arguing that once the court directs the summons to proceed without reply, it cannot later entertain applications for condonation of delay. The court …

MR. ASHISH JAYANTILAL SHETHversusMRS. KUNTAL PRATIK SHAH

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged the City Civil Court’s orders allowing the defendants to file delayed replies to summons for judgment in summary suits, arguing that once the court directs the summons to proceed without reply, it cannot later entertain applications for condonation of delay. The court …

MRS. ALPA PRAKASH SHETHversusMRS. KUNTAL PRATIK SHAH

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged orders of the City Civil Court that allowed defendants in summary suits to file delayed replies to summons for judgment after the court had directed the summons to proceed without reply. The court examined the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil …

SHRI. NAMDEO DAGDU HINGEversusSHRI. RAMCHANDRA LAXMAN VAIRAGAR AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Shri Namdeo Dagdu Hinge, filed a review petition challenging the order dated 4 March 2026 which directed him to deposit Rs. 2,000 in execution of a decree. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petitioner had a valid justification for not complying with the decree dated 19 April …

AMINABIBI TAJJUDDIN KHAN AND ORSversusSALIM ALI KHAN AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition but failed to appear before the court on two scheduled dates, 24 February 2026 and again on 4 March 2026. The court noted the petitioners' lack of interest in prosecuting the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. …

GANESHA MOHANversusRAGINI MOHAN

Disposed Off

The applicant, Ganesha Mohan, filed a Civil Revision Application No. 760 of 2023. On 24 February 2026, the Court ordered the application to be listed for dismissal on 4 March 2026, noting that no one appeared for the applicant. On the scheduled date, the applicant again failed to appear, indicating …

SHOBHA BABU CHAVAN SINCE DEC THR LRSversusPRAVINCHANDRA DAHYABHAI AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought to amend their original suit (SC Suit No.1242 of 2011) to include a prayer for restoration of possession of the suit property, relying on Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The amendment was filed after a decree in a related suit (SC Suit No.1360 of 2011) had already …

MR. RAMESH LAKHAMA GHASEversusBALARAM DAYA GADMALE AND ORS

Disposed Off

Petitioner Ramesh Lakhama Ghase filed a writ petition challenging an order related to an alleged encroachment of land. During the hearing, the Court expressed reluctance to interfere with the impugned order. The petitioner's counsel then sought permission to withdraw the petition, indicating an …

MANISHA MANOHAR BARE AND ORS.versusSUREKHA AMOL KAMBLE AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The applicants filed a civil revision seeking relief against the respondents, contending that the trial court erred in allowing two separate claims for Permanent Alternate Accommodation (PAA) concerning a single room in an old building. The respondents, particularly Defendant No.1, raised a specific …

SMT. SHUBHADA YASHWANT SAPREversusBHAU WAGHU GAIKWAD DECD THRU LHR AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Shubhada Yashwant Sapre, filed a writ petition against the legal heirs of the deceased respondent, Bhau Waghu Gaikwad. The court attempted to contact the petitioner via registered post, but the letter was returned marked 'deceased'. No instructions or participation were received from …

GAURISHANKAR NEELKANTH KALYANI AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a November 2019 order of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Alibag, which had partially allowed an application by defendants 4‑7 under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC and directed that the suit be valued under Section 6(4)(i) of the Maharashtra Court …

KHANDERAO MURLIDHAR THETE AND ORSversusSMT. SHAKUNTALA LAXMAN THETE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners’ counsel informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous. No substantive merits of the case were addressed. The order …

NIKHIL NAREWNDRA WAGHMARE AND ORSversusKSHAMA SHARADKUMAR WAGHELA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged a July 2023 order of the City Civil Court that allowed a chamber summons against Respondent No.1 (the developer) and directed her impleadment in a suit seeking declaration of protected occupier status and rehabilitation rights. The petitioners argued they were the dominus …

GULAB GAJANAN THOPATEversusPARBHAKAR DADASO YADAV AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged a July 2022 order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Saswad, which rejected their applications to bring the legal heirs of a deceased plaintiff on record, to set aside an abatement, and to condone delay in seeking that set‑aside. The plaintiff had died in December 2016 …

M/S. R. J. GUEST WORLD AND ANRversusM/S. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED

Disposed Off

M/s. R.J. Guest World & Anr. filed a civil revision application (No. 206 of 2022) before the High Court of Bombay. The applicants failed to appear at the first hearing on 16 January 2026, and the matter was listed for dismissal. On the subsequent date, 23 January 2026, the applicants again did not …

BANK OF MAHARASHTRAversusJITENDRA PATHAK AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bank of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging a suit against Jitendra Pathak and others. The petition was filed after the suit had been decreed in terms of a compromise, as evidenced by an order dated 16 June 2025. The court examined whether any relief remained for the petitioner given …

JITENDRA SATYANARAYAN SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Jitendra Satyanarayan Singh, filed an application for leave to appeal (Pvt.) (ST.) No. 435 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the applicant on the scheduled date of 6 January 2026, and the matter was listed for dismissal on 13 January 2026. The applicant …

SHRI. TUKARAM KRISHNA PATILversusSMT. RITU RAJESH TAWDE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Shri Tukaram Krishna Patil, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Akanksha K. Pawar, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the application, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusVAIBHAV KASHINATH PATIL

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed an interim application seeking condonation of a five‑day delay in filing its leave‑to‑appeal petition. The respondent, Vaibhav Kashinath Patil, was served notice but did not appear. The learned judge examined the length of the delay and the justification offered by the …