Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SANDESH D PATIL

95 judgments · newest first · showing 1–95

DHANISH LIYAKAT KURESHI AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioners, Dhanish Liyakat Kureshi & Ors., filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. At the request of their counsel, the petition was withdrawn. The Court allowed the withdrawal and granted liberty to approach appropriate authorities for any further remedies. Consequently, …

VINOD VASANT GHATAGE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners, Vinod Vasant Ghatage and another, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the filing of a charge-sheet. After the charge-sheet was filed, they sought the court's permission to withdraw the existing petition and to file a fresh petition incorporating the charge-sheet and related …

LAXMIKANT HEMRAJ BHARADIAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Laxmikant Hemraj Bharadia, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. After the charge-sheet was filed in the underlying criminal case, the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The petitioner’s …

MANISHA ANADSAGAR UDGI AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Manisha Anadsagar Udgi and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the petition was rendered moot by a prior order of this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 6 of 2026 dated 02‑02‑2026, and produced a copy of that order. …

SIDDHARTH MAHADEV MUSALE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The criminal application filed by Siddharth Mahadev Musale and others was heard before the Hon'ble Judge Shivkumar Dige. Both parties consented to an adjournment. The matter was stood over to 23 December 2025. No substantive merits were addressed. The order was limited to procedural postponement.

DEEPAK RAGHUNATH MANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Deepak R. Mane, filed a writ petition seeking the return of a revolver seized during a 2012 case. He had been acquitted in 2023, and the trial court ordered the weapon be returned to him if he held a valid licence, otherwise to the Collector for disposal. The District Magistrate …

SAGAR SHIVAJI MANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Sagar Shivaji Mane, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging an unspecified order. The trial in the underlying criminal case concluded, resulting in the petitioner’s acquittal. Counsel for the petitioner argued that, in view …

Anantrao Ganpatrao Patil and OrsversusShantilal Kantilal Patil and Ors

Disposed Off

The appellants challenged a judgment of the District Judge‑2, Barshi, which set aside a 2002 order that barred the defendant from filing a written statement, imposed a modest cost, and remanded the suit for fresh adjudication with a time‑limit. The appellants argued that the appellate court should …

UMESH SHANKAR PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. Subsequently, a charge‑sheet was filed in the underlying criminal matter. The petitioner then applied to withdraw the existing writ petition and to file a fresh petition attaching the charge‑sheet and making …

ASHWINI ANIL CHAVAN AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Ashwini Anil Chavan and another, filed a writ petition challenging a criminal proceeding. The trial concluded with the petitioners being acquitted by the trial court. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the acquittal. The …

SADASHIV SAKHARAM METKARI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

Petitioner Sadashiv Sakharam Metkari and others filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 4753 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was accompanied by Interim Application No. 218 of 2026. On 7 August 2026, Justice …

SACHIN LAXMAN JANAVE AND ANRversusNANA JYOTI KAMBLE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellants filed an appeal against Order No. 17 of 2026, seeking direction for the pending suit to be heard by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kagal. The trial court had earlier returned the plaint under Order‑7, Rule‑10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and re‑numbered it. Both parties …

SACHIN LAXMAN JANAVE AND ANRversusNANA JYOTI KAMBLE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellants filed an appeal against Order No. 17 of 2026, seeking direction for the pending suit to be heard by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kagal. The trial court had earlier returned the plaint under Order‑7, Rule‑10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and re‑numbered it. Both parties …

Manish Nanasaheb DeshmukhversusThe State of Maharashtra

Allowed

Petitioners Manish Nanasaheb Deshmukh & Anr filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 287 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing …

SHOYEB LATIF MULLAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

Shoyeb Latif Mulla filed a writ petition (No. 279 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, appearing before the Court, instructed counsel Ms. Tanvi Tapkire to seek leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, after …

NIKHIL DILIP PATIL AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 275 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court. While the petition was pending, the investigating agency filed a chargesheet against the petitioners. The petitioners then moved the Court seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition and to file a fresh …

LAXMI STEEL AND FABRICATIONversusM/S. ASHWMEGH ELECTRICALS

Disposed Off

Laxmi Steel and Fabrication Works filed an application for leave to appeal against a decision of the lower court, naming M/s. Ashwmegh Electricals & Anr. as respondents. The matter was listed for hearing on 23 April 2026 and again on 12 June 2026, but the applicant failed to appear or prosecute the …

SITARAM NARAYAN MAHANKALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Sitaram Narayan Mahankal, filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel, Adv. Vaishnavi Shelake, requested permission to withdraw the petition and to be allowed to file a fresh petition. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted the permission to …

PRABHAVATI MALKARI MAHAJAN AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners, Prabhavati Malkari Mahajan and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the trial proceedings. The trial concluded with the acquittal of all petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners informed the Court of the acquittal. The Court held that, in view of the acquittal, the …

ABDULLAH SALEEM KHATEEBversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Abdullah Saleem Khateeb, filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief. After the charge sheet was filed in the underlying case, the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the present petition and to file a fresh petition attaching the charge sheet and making appropriate …

AHMED AKBAR MOMIN AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

Petitioners Ahmed Akbar Momin and another challenged the registration of an FIR under Sections 52 and 53 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966, alleging that the construction on the disputed property was illegal but that no cognizable offence existed and a preliminary inquiry was …

PRATIK RAMCHANDRA SANKPALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Pratik Ramchandra Sankpal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking permission to withdraw the petition after the charge-sheet had been filed, and to file a fresh petition annexing the charge-sheet. The petitioner argued that the present petition was no longer necessary …

SWAPNIL SUHAS RAUTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Swapnil Suhas Raut, sought leave from the High Court to withdraw his criminal application after filing a charge-sheet, requesting liberty to file a fresh application if advised. The learned counsel for the applicant made the request on his instructions. The Court considered whether …

UTKARSH MARUTI PATIL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners, Utkarsh Maruti Patil and others, filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court. After the charge-sheet was filed, they sought the Court's permission to withdraw the existing petition and to file a fresh petition incorporating the charge-sheet. The sole issue before the …

PRANITA PATIL KADAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Dr. Pranita Patil Kadam filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. After the charge-sheet was filed against her, she sought permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh one. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Dheeraj Patil, argued that the filing of the charge-sheet rendered …

AJIT DASHRATH ROKADE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. After the charge-sheet was filed, the petitioners, through counsel, requested to withdraw the petition and sought permission to file a fresh petition incorporating the charge-sheet. The Court considered …

VASANT RAJARAM PATANKAR AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

Petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 477 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw and disposed of the petition as …

ANANTRAO GANPARTRAO PATIL AND ORSversusSHANTILAL KANTILAL PATIL AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellants challenged a judgment of the District Judge‑2, Barshi, which set aside a 2002 order that barred the defendant from filing a written statement, imposed a modest cost, and remanded the suit for fresh adjudication with a time‑limit. The appellants argued that the appellate court should …

APPASAHEB KRISHNA SURYAWANSHIversusSITARAM TATOBA JADHAV AND ORS.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Appasaheb Krishna Suryawanshi, filed an interim application in the High Court of Bombay, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, seeking permission to withdraw the pending application and to file a fresh one. The respondent side, Sitaram Tatoba Jadhav & Ors., did not appear or present any counsel. …

BAJIRAO MARUTI MOREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Bajirao Maruti More, filed a criminal writ petition challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. After the charge-sheet was filed in the underlying criminal case, the petitioner sought leave of the High Court to withdraw the writ petition and to file a fresh petition if …

VILAS TUKARAM JADHAV AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking permission to withdraw the petition after a charge-sheet had been filed in the criminal matter. They requested liberty to file a fresh petition that would annex the charge-sheet and include the necessary averments. The Court considered whether the …

DHANARAJ ABHIMANYU KSHIRSAGAR AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Petitioners Dhanaraj Abhimanyu Kshirsagar & Ors filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 572 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. After the Assistant Public Prosecutor informed the Court that a chargesheet had been filed, the petitioners' counsel sought permission to withdraw the …

RAVINDRA DNYANOBA PATIL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking permission to withdraw the petition after a charge-sheet had been filed, and to file a fresh petition annexing the charge-sheet. The court considered whether it could allow such withdrawal and grant liberty to file a new …

SUNITA BALU RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a member of the Laman community classified as VJNT, sought validation of her 2003 caste certificate, claiming ordinary residence in Ratnagiri district before the statutory cut‑off date of 21‑Nov‑1961. The Caste Scrutiny Committee rejected her claim, citing discrepancies between the …

SAMBHAJI SADASHIV CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Sambhaji Sadashiv Chavan, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the trial court's acquittal. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the acquittal rendered the petition moot. The court noted the submission and considered that no further relief could be granted. Consequently, …

AMAR VITTHAL SHINDE AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners, Amar Vitthal Shinde and others, filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. After the charge-sheet was filed in the underlying case, they applied to withdraw the petition and obtain liberty to file a fresh petition incorporating the charge-sheet. The …

ABDUL WAJED TOUFEEQUE AHMED QUZI AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicants filed a criminal application seeking permission to withdraw their pending petition after a charge-sheet had been filed. They requested liberty to file a fresh petition that would annex the charge-sheet and include the necessary averments. The court considered whether such withdrawal …

YUNNUS KARIMSAB KAMBLEversusATMARAM SHIVANNA HIRAPURE AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners sought leave to appeal in a criminal matter but, after deciding to file an appeal before the Sessions Court in accordance with the precedent set in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 SCC Online SC 1320), they requested the withdrawal of the present petition. The learned …

SANTOSH BHAUSAHEB NALAVADE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief, but the prosecution filed summary proceedings in the case. The petitioners argued that the summary proceedings should be considered, yet no substantive material remained for the court's review. The court noted that, in the absence of any …

ANIS ASHRAF SHEIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

Anis Ashraf Sheikh filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashing of an FIR. The petitioner failed to appear before the court despite multiple adjournments. The court noted that no interim relief had been obtained since April 2021. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for default. The court …

BALKRISHNA LAXMAN BHUVADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dismissed

The petitioner, Balkrishna Laxman Bhuvad, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashing of a chargesheet filed under FIR No.33 of 2018. The petition alleged that the chargesheet had never been circulated and that the petitioner had not been given an opportunity to appear. The High Court …

SANGEETA NARENDRAKUMAR PUROHITversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Sangeeta Narendrakumar Purohit, filed a criminal writ petition challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. After the charge-sheet was filed in the underlying criminal case, the petitioner sought permission from the High Court to withdraw the writ petition and to file a …

RAHUL EKNATH ANDHALE AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dismissed

The applicants, Rahul Eknath Andhale and others, filed a criminal application seeking the quashing of an FIR. No appearance was made by the applicants at any stage since the filing in 2022. The court noted the complete lack of participation by the applicants. Consequently, the application was …

AKSHAY JALINDER MANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Akshay Jalinder Mane filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 2177 of 2022 in the Bombay High Court challenging the criminal proceedings against him. While the petition was pending, the trial court acquitted the accused in the underlying case. Counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the acquittal …

NANDKUMAR P JOSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The petitioner, Nandkumar P Joshi, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. During the morning session, the petitioner’s counsel requested a postponement to obtain instructions, and the matter was adjourned. When the case was called again in the second …

MUJAHIDPASHA JAVED SHEIKH AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

Petitioners Mujahidpasha Javed Sheikh & Anr. filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners failed to appear when called for hearing. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No …

PIYUSH PANKAJ AGARWALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Piyush Pankaj Agarwal, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 995 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel Mr. Aarya Ambulkar (on behalf of Mr. Gaurav Nankar), filed a praecipe seeking the Court's permission to withdraw the …

YASHWANT RAMCHANDRA PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dismissed

The applicant, Yashwant Ramchandra Patil, filed an application seeking cancellation of his bail in a criminal matter. The impugned order dated 19 May 2017 had granted bail, which the applicant now wished to have set aside. No counsel or the applicant appeared before the court when the matter was …

SANTOSH KEDARNATH MANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Santosh Kedarnath Mane, filed a criminal application seeking interference with the order of framing of charge in his case. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor informed the court that a chargesheet had already been filed and the matter was set for trial, with charges already …

VISHAL RASIKLAL DOSHI AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioners, Mr. Vishal Rasiklal Doshi and others, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 4145 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, challenging a matter pending before the court. While the petition was pending, the investigating agency filed a chargesheet in the underlying criminal case. …

TUSHAR EKNATH MOHITEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioner, Tushar Eknath Mohite, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. After the charge-sheet was filed by the State, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh one. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the filing of the …

ANIRUDDHA KRUSHNA ZALTE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking permission to withdraw the petition after a charge-sheet had been filed, and to file a fresh petition annexing the charge-sheet. The court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw the existing petition, allowing …

RUPESH CHAKRAVEER MAHINDRAKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Rupesh Chakraveer Mahindrakar, had filed a criminal writ petition which remained pending before the Bombay High Court. During the pendency, the investigating agency filed a chargesheet against the petitioner. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the writ …

ANANDRAO SARJERAO THOMBAREversusPRAKASH DIGAMBAR LANJEKAR AND ANR

Disposed Off

An application for leave to appeal was filed by Anandrao Sarjerao Thombare against Prakash Digambar Lanjekar and another respondent. During the proceedings, the second respondent passed away. The applicant's counsel argued that the application should proceed, while the respondent's counsel noted the …

ANANDRAO SARJERAO THOMBAREversusPRAKASH DIGAMBAR LANJEKAR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Anandrao Sarjerao Thombare, filed an application for leave to appeal in a criminal matter before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. The respondents were Prakash Digambar Lanjekar and another party. During the proceedings, it was brought to the court's notice that Respondent No.2 …

SHANTANU SHRIGAJANAN KOLHAPUREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Shantanu Shrigajanan Kolhapure, filed a criminal writ petition seeking leave to withdraw the petition and to file a discharge application before the Sessions Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested this relief. The Court, after considering the application, granted …

PIYUSH PANDURANG PAWARversusMEGHA PRADIP AGRAWAL AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Piyush Pandurang Pawar, filed an application for leave to appeal before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, against Megha Pradip Agrawal and another. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application in light of the Supreme Court judgment in Celestium …

KAKASO GOPAL TATE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed

The applicants, Kakaso Gopal Tate and others, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court. After the charge-sheet was filed, they sought leave to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to file a fresh one. The learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Vishal Vilas Chavan on behalf …

SHIVAJI JAYWANT SAWANTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The applicant, Shivaji Jaywant Sawant, filed a criminal application seeking quash of FIR No.196 of 2022. The matter had been listed only once since 2022 and no interim relief was granted. On the date of hearing, the applicant failed to appear before the court. The bench, presided by Justice Sandesh …

DR. PRASHANT PRAKASH LOKHANDEversusNAWAB SULEMAN SAYYAD AND ANR.

Dismissed

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition in 2019 seeking relief against the respondents. The matter was listed before the Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. The petitioner failed to appear despite the court’s summons. No arguments or evidence were presented on behalf of the petitioner. The court, …

GANESH NAVNATH WAYCHAL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Ganesh Navnath Waychal and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging a crime registered at Shirgonda Police Station against the same company for the same offences. The petitioners, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the petition and instead approach the police …

BHAUSAHEB VITTHAL MOHITEversusMANISHA W/O. DATTATRAYA JADHAV AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellant, Bhausaheb Vitthal Mohite, filed an appeal against an order dated 16 September 2025. The High Court directed that the appellant be served afresh because the matter was transferred to the Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. The appellant was duly served but failed to appear before the court. …

SURESH DATTATRAY PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Suresk Dattatray Patil, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. After the charge-sheet was filed, he sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh one. The petition raised the procedural question of whether a writ petition …

SAHIL HIRALAL ATTAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The petitioners, Sahil Hiralal Attar and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the proceedings in RCC No. 411 of 2024. The charge in the case was framed on 12 May 2026, but the petitioners failed to appear when the matter was called out. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, Mr. S. …

Vaibhav Mohan ChoudhariversusState of Maharashtra

Allowed

The applicants, Vaibhav Mohan Choudhari and others, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. After the filing of a charge-sheet by the State of Maharashtra, the applicants sought the Court's permission to withdraw their pending application, requesting …

Abhay Lalit SuranaversusSumitra Abhay Surana

Dismissed

Petitioner Abhay Lalit Surana filed a contempt petition alleging that Respondents Sumitra Abhay Surana and others willfully disobeyed an order dated 4 August 2025 passed in an appeal against Order No. 444. The order directed that if a disputed amount had not been disbursed, Respondents 2 and 3 were …

VIJAY LAHU PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Petitioner Vijay Lahu Patil filed three criminal writ petitions (Nos. 4332, 4334, 4365 of 2022) before the Bombay High Court, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the accused in the underlying criminal case had been acquitted. On that …

KHAJAPPA PARASAPPA AARENAVRU AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners, Khajappa Parasappa Aarenavru and others, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The trial of the underlying criminal matter had progressed to the stage of judgment pronouncement. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Onkar Arun Mane, informed the court that they …

YOGESH NIWASRAO JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Petitioner Yogesh Niwasrao Jadhav filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The Respondent State, through its Additional Public Prosecutor S. V. Gavand, informed the Court that a "Summary Report" had been …

SHRI DIGAMBAR VITHOBA KAMBLE AND ANRversusSHRI BAPU SADHU KAMBLE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellants challenged a judgment dated 14 August 2015 of the District Judge, Sangli, which had rejected their application for a stay in Regular Civil Appeal No. 59 of 2014. The order had been in force for more than eleven years without any further hearing. The High Court examined whether it was …

SHRI DIGAMBAR VITHOBA KAMBLE AND ANRversusSHRI BAPU SADHU KAMBLE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellants challenged a judgment dated 14 August 2015 of the District Judge, Sangli, which had rejected their application for a stay in Regular Civil Appeal No. 59 of 2014. The order had been in force for more than eleven years without any further hearing. The High Court examined whether it was …

MOHANLAL KANWARLAL VAIDversusASAVARI AVINASH DESHPANDE AND ANR.

Allowed

The appellant, Mohanlal Kanwarlal Vaid, filed an application seeking leave to withdraw his criminal appeal after a judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. Ghanasekaran. He also requested permission to initiate appropriate proceedings before the Sessions Judge. The Court considered the time taken by …

YOGESH NAGNATH PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

Petitioner Yogesh Nagnath Pawar filed a criminal writ petition challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's order that upheld the rejection of his discharge application in a 2016 criminal case. The petitioner argued that CCTV footage either did not show his presence or, if it did, it was at a time …

KIRANARAJ PURUSHOTTAM GHODAKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Kiranaraj Purushottam Ghodake, filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief. After the charge-sheet was filed, the petitioner moved the court for leave to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be …

MARYAN ALES MANTERversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Maryan Ales Manter, filed a criminal application seeking leave to withdraw the pending application in view of filing a charge-sheet, requesting liberty to file a fresh application if advised. The learned counsel submitted the request on 7 August 2026. The Court examined whether the …

RAMAKANT LAXMANT GAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Ramakant Laxman Gawade, sought to have FIR No. 28 of 2025 and the accompanying chargesheet quashed, alleging that the FIR was filed malafidely due to an existing family dispute. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 74, 75(2), 333, 351(2) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, …

SOMNATH JAYSING KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The petitioner, Somnath Jaysing Kadam, filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking permission to withdraw the petition after a charge-sheet had been filed, and to file a fresh petition incorporating the charge-sheet. The petitioner’s counsel requested the court’s leave to …

VISHWANATH PANDURANG DALVI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners, Vishwanath Pandurang Dalvi and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging a complaint pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) in Mandangad. Respondent No. 2, through counsel, undertook to withdraw the complaint, and consequently the petitioner's counsel …

SUNIL NARHARI BALUGADE AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners, Sunil Narhari Balugade and another, filed a writ petition challenging certain proceedings. The petitioners later sought permission to withdraw the petition after a chargesheet was filed, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition with the chargesheet attached. The learned counsel …

PRADEEP ASHOK PATIL (BHOJE)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposed Off

Petitioner Pradeep Ashok Patil filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor informed the Court that the petitioner had already been acquitted by the trial court. The Court held that, in view …

PUSHPA ASHOK KAMBLE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicants, Pushpa Ashok Kamble and others, filed a criminal application seeking leave to withdraw the pending application after the charge-sheet had been filed. They requested liberty to file a fresh application if advised. The learned counsel for the respondents opposed the withdrawal. The …

VIKAS S. KULKARNIversusTHE COMPETENT AUTHORITY /DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND ORS.

Disposed Off

Vikas S. Kulkarni filed a writ petition (No. 1874 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging actions of the Deputy Collector, Sangli and others. The petition was accompanied by an interim application. The bailiff’s report later revealed that the sole petitioner was …

SUBHASH MAHANTAPPA MALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition on 22 December 2015 seeking the quashing of FIR No. 395 of 2015. The petition remained uncirculated since its filing in 2015. The respondent State filed that charges had already been framed against the petitioner. No counsel appeared on behalf of the …

GOKULABAI BHIMRAO SALUNKHEversusSHRI. ANILKUMAR LAXMAN BHOSALE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellant, Gokulabai Bhimrao Salunkhe, filed an appeal against an order dated 2019 along with two interim applications. During the pendency of the appeal, the sole appellant passed away. The learned counsel for the appellant informed the court of the appellant's death. The court held that the …

SANJAY RANGRAO GHODAKE AND ORSversusDHANAJI BABURAO PATIL AND ORS

Disposed Off

The applicants filed an interim application before the Bombay High Court seeking correction of the order dated 12 June 2026. They asserted that the suit had been withdrawn solely by them and that the order should reflect this fact. The court considered the claim, found no impediment to the …

MAHAADEV MALLESHAPPA KUDREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners, Mahadev Malleshappa Kudre and others, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court examined …

VINAYAK PARSHURAM PARADKAR AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition in 2024 seeking the quashing of FIR No. 1 of 2024 registered at Malvan Police Station for offences under Sections 353, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The respondent State, through APP Mrs. Priyanka Rane, informed the Court that a charge‑sheet …