Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
208 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioner, Surekha Ranjit Rathod, filed a criminal writ petition alleging that her daughter had left home because the petitioner wanted to arrange her marriage to another person. The respondent State filed an FIR and charge sheet, and the missing girl was initially placed under the custody of …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 4053 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through their counsel, requested the unconditional withdrawal of the petition. The Court considered the …
Mayur Maroti Akulwar, through his natural guardian, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the speedy determination of his claim that he belongs to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe, a claim pending since 24 March 2025. He required a caste validity certificate to appear for the NEET …
The petitioner, Ashok Suryawanshi, sought recognition as a member of the Scheduled Tribe ‘Thakur’ and challenged the Scrutiny Committee’s order that invalidated his claim on the grounds of area restriction and failure to satisfy the affinity test. He produced pre‑independence school records of his …
The petitioner, an injured eyewitness (PW‑3), filed Criminal Application No. 82 of 2026 seeking condonation of a 22‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction. The appeal of another accused in the same case had already been admitted by the court. The application argued that the …
The petitioners, Damu Ashruba Pachunde and others, filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 26 of 2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition alleged that an order of the court had been contravened, leading to contempt …
The petitioners, Shivlal Seva Rathod and another, filed a petition seeking rental compensation from the State of Maharashtra. The State, through its Additional Government Pleader, submitted that an order determining the compensation had been passed in 2015 and that a direction for payment was …
The petitioners, Ashok Arjunrao Khillare and others, filed a contempt petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition sought relief concerning an order of contempt. The petitioners later informed the Court that they had complied with the contempt order. On this basis, the …
Prashant Dagdu Warkari filed a contempt petition against Pradeep Vyas, Secretary of the Public Health Department, alleging non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The petitioner sought relief on the ground that the order remained unexecuted. Counsel for the petitioner, A. N. Deshpande, appearing …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Madhukar Ingole, filed a contempt petition challenging an order that directed the Scrutiny Committee to decide his caste validation claim and ordered provisional regularisation of his services subject to a caste validation certificate. The respondent State, through its AGP, …
The petitioner, convicted of murder under IPC s.302 and sentenced to life imprisonment, applied for parole leave on humanitarian grounds, citing his daughter's serious illness and a willing surety. The parole applications were rejected by the prison authorities on the grounds of a negative police …
The petitioner, Avinash Jairam Pakalwad, filed a writ petition seeking protection from his employer's show‑cause notice that threatened termination for not producing a tribe‑validity certificate. The petitioner’s claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe has been pending before the …
Uttam S/o Sahebrao Salve filed a contempt petition against Manukumar Srivastava. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. S.K. Mathpati and Mr. Sandeep B. Sontakke, submitted that the order of contempt had been fully complied with. The respondents, represented by Mr. S.J. Salgare, were not required to appear …
The petitioner, Ganesh Basweshwar Pattewad, sought protection from his employer who issued a show‑cause notice demanding a caste validity certificate, alleging that his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe was pending before the Scrutiny Committee since 2016. The State, through the …
The petitioner, Durgaprasad Omprakash Mishra, sought extension of a 28‑day furlough leave granted on 25‑09‑2025, arguing that the leave expired because Respondent No.3 (the Tehsildar) failed to process the required surety bond. The respondents contended that once the furlough period lapses, it …
The petitioner, Muktai Kishore Jadhav, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the Scrutiny Committee (Respondent No.2) to decide his claim of belonging to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe, a matter pending since 12 September 2025. The petitioner argued that a prompt decision was essential for his …
The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon was subject to a bailable warrant in a contempt petition for allegedly not complying with the court's directions. The petitioner’s proposal, which had been pending, was finally decided on the same day the warrant was issued, and the court …
Multiple petitioners filed contempt petitions (Nos. 90, 96, 98, 99, 101, 102, 103, 104 of 2020) against Uday Chaudhari and another, alleging non‑compliance with earlier court orders. The petitioners, through counsel Sanket S. Joshi, submitted that the contempt orders had been fully complied with. …
Multiple petitioners filed contempt petitions against Uday Chaudhari and another, alleging non‑compliance with earlier court orders. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the alleged contempt orders had been complied with. The court examined the submissions and found no basis to continue the …
Multiple petitioners filed contempt petitions (Nos. 90, 96, 98, 99, 101, 102, 103, 104 of 2020) against Uday Chaudhari and another, alleging non‑compliance with earlier court orders. The petitioners, through counsel Sanket S. Joshi, submitted that the contempt orders had been fully complied with. …
Multiple petitioners filed contempt petitions (Nos. 90, 96, 98, 99, 101, 102, 103, 104 of 2020) against Uday Chaudhari and another, alleging non‑compliance with earlier court orders. The petitioners, through counsel Sanket S. Joshi, submitted that the contempt orders had been fully complied with. …
Multiple petitioners filed contempt petitions against Uday Chaudhari and another, alleging non‑compliance with earlier court orders. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the alleged contempt orders had been complied with. The court examined the submissions and found no basis to continue the …
Multiple petitioners filed contempt petitions (Nos. 90, 96, 98, 99, 101, 102, 103, 104 of 2020) against Uday Chaudhari and another, alleging non‑compliance with earlier court orders. The petitioners, through counsel Sanket S. Joshi, submitted that the contempt orders had been fully complied with. …
The petitioner challenged the order of the Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his claim to belong to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe. He argued that genealogical evidence and prior validity certificates granted to his cousins and relatives demonstrated his entitlement. The State …
The petitioner, Vaishnavi Ramchandra Nirde, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Caste Scrutiny Committee to decide her pending tribe claim, which has been under consideration since 09/09/2025. She required a validity certificate before 30/06/2026 to pursue higher studies. The …
Petitioner Yogesh Chandrakumar Kasarle filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tribe Scrutiny Committee to decide his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu tribe promptly, as he requires a validity certificate for his studies by the end of June 2026. The petitioner argued that the delay in …
The appellant sought to amend his criminal appeal to challenge the order framing a charge against him, arguing that he could still be discharged. The State contended that once a charge is framed under Section 228 of the CrPC, discharge under Sections 216 or 227 is no longer permissible. The Court …
The petitioner, Mohammad Taqi Sirajoddin, filed three criminal applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel Ms. U. T. Pathan, sought to withdraw all the pending applications. The court was asked to consider whether the applications could …
The petitioners, three brothers, challenged the Scrutiny Committee’s order dated 19‑12‑2025 that invalidated their claim to belong to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. They relied on a prior judgment granting conditional validity of a tribe certificate to their sister, Shweta, in Writ Petition No. …
The petitioner, Pragati Vishwas Kshirsagar, filed a writ petition seeking an expeditious decision on his claim of belonging to the ‘Koli Mahadev’ Scheduled Tribe, a claim pending since December 2024. He required the tribe validity certificate to pursue higher studies. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petition was filed by the guardian of a minor, Atharv Rahul Chilwar, claiming that the petitioner belongs to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. The claim has been pending before the State's Scrutiny Committee since 13 November 2025. The petitioner sought speedy verification to pursue higher …
Ajay Sunil Nainwad filed a contempt petition (No. 307 of 2026) against Dinesh B. Tidke, Joint Commissioner. The petitioner alleged that an order under contempt had been breached. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Yashraj D. Joshi, submitted that the order had been complied with. The court considered …
The petitioner, Atmaram Pandurang ChorMale, challenged the order of the Tribe Scrutiny Committee that rejected his claim of belonging to the Dhanwar Scheduled Tribe. He submitted two documents—a 1945 birth certificate of his father and a 1951 mortgage deed of his grandfather indicating the Dhanwar …
Petitioner Pradeep Hukumchand Chudiwal filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction that the Police Complaint Authority (PCA) under Section 22P of the Maharashtra Police Act expedite the hearing of his complaint. The petitioner’s counsel requested leave to add an …
Manoj Sadashiv Choudhary filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to the Superintendent of Police, Beed, to decide a representation dated 12 January 2026. The petitioner argued that his earlier representation on the same matter had been rejected by the Court on its merits. The learned …
The petitioners, Vikas Ratanlal Jain and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an unspecified grievance against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court, after hearing counsel, directed the petitioners to approach the State Police Complaint Authority to seek redress. The petitioners' …
Nitin Bhaskar Lobhe filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 191 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Ganesh Shinde and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, allowed the …
The petitioner, a student, challenged an order dated 19 November 2025 by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee that disposed of his tribe claim on the ground of alleged non‑co‑operation. The petitioner asserted that he would appear before the committee on 26 February 2026 and cooperate …
The petitioner, Chhatrapati Shivaji Education Society, filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra. The petition arose from a proposal that had already been decided by the court. The High Court examined whether any aspect of the petition survived the earlier decision. It held that, …
The petitioner, Manoj Kumar Indrasing Patil, filed a contempt petition (Continuing Petition No. 115 of 2017) against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel stated that the petitioner had not been in contact, suggesting that the order underlying the contempt claim had been …
Petitioner Rajeshkumar Narayan Kottapalli filed a writ petition seeking speedy disposal of his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe, which had been pending before the Scrutiny Committee since April 2, 2018. The Court examined whether the prolonged delay infringed the petitioner's …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions seeking speedy disposal of their pending tribe claims before the Scrutiny Committee, which had been pending since 28 March 2025. They submitted that a Vigilance Cell enquiry had been completed and the report was already with the Committee, with a …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions seeking speedy disposal of their pending tribe claims before the Scrutiny Committee, which had been pending since 28 March 2025. They submitted that a Vigilance Cell enquiry report had already been filed and that they would file replies to the report on …
The petitioner, Shaikh Chand, filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court. While the petition was pending, the petitioner died. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition could no longer be considered. The Court held that the death of the petitioner extinguished the petition’s …
The petitioner, Nagesh Vyankati Pentewad, filed a writ petition seeking a validity certificate for his studies, contingent upon recognition of his claim to belong to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. The claim has been pending before the Scrutiny Committee since 23 January 2025. The petitioner argued …
The petitioners, Prakash Vyankat Sarje and another, filed a civil application seeking continuation of interim protection previously granted by the High Court on 20 March 2025. That protection had been discontinued on 20 June 2025. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, raised no strong objection …
The petitioners, Sudhakar Shrimant Sarje and another, filed a civil application seeking continuation of interim protection that the Bombay High Court had granted on 20 March 2025 but which lapsed on 20 June 2025. The State of Maharashtra, represented by its Secretary, did not raise any strong …
The petitioners, Sudam Dhondiram Rathod and others, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the State of Maharashtra to pay compensation for their lands acquired at Khoradsawangi, Jalna, alleging that the interest component of the awarded compensation was not paid. The State, through its …
The petitioner, a 22‑year‑old service employee, filed a writ petition seeking protection from disciplinary action by his employer for not producing a Scheduled Tribe (ST) validity certificate, as his claim of belonging to the "Tokre Koli" tribe was pending before the Scheduled Tribe Certificate …
Karbhari Kishan Gawali applied for bail to attend his granddaughter's marriage scheduled from 20th to 22nd February 2026. He submitted the marriage invitation and police confirmation of the event. The Court considered the request and, while acknowledging the personal reason, limited the bail period …
The petitioners, Omkar Subhash Sabanwad and Gayatri Subhash Sabanwad, applied for a Tribe Certificate as members of the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe, which was rejected by the Sub Divisional Officer on 31‑Oct‑2025. They filed appeals to the Scrutiny Committee under Section 5(1) of the Maharashtra …
The petitioners, Omkar Subhash Sabanwad and Gayatri Subhash Sabanwad, applied for a Tribe Certificate as members of the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe, but the Sub‑Divisional Officer in Dharmabad rejected their application on 31‑Oct‑2025. They filed appeals under Section 5(1) of the Maharashtra …
The petitioner, Gajanan Prakash Pothkantwar, filed a continuous petition (No. 139 of 2015) challenging an order passed by the Education Officer. The petitioner later informed the court that, due to a subsequent event, there was nothing left to pursue in the petition. The court, upon hearing the …
The petitioner, Pawandeep Singh Mahendrasingh Kohli, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief concerning certain criminal cases. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Chatterji Joydeep, informed the Court that the criminal cases in question had already …
The petitioner, Satish Nivrutti Chavan, challenged the order dated 26‑02‑2007 of the Scrutiny Committee which invalidated his claim of belonging to the Thakar Scheduled Tribe. He argued that, during the pendency of the writ petition, he obtained his grandfather's school records and other …
The petitioners, Manik Deorao Bargaje and another, filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners did not appear before the Court. The Attorney General for the State informed the Court that respondent No.4 had deposited Rs.5,48,134 in the account of petitioner No.2, …
Balaji Nagorao Yadpalwar filed a writ petition seeking the court’s intervention to expedite the determination of his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe, which has been pending before the Scrutiny Committee since 4 December 2025. He was appointed as an Attendant and, under Clause …
Harish Laxman Sudewad filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the Scrutiny Committee to determine his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe, a matter that had been pending since 11 July 2025. The petitioner argued that the delay was impeding his plans for higher studies. …
The petitioners, Rajendra Vithal Kunte and another, filed a petition before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition arose from an order of contempt that had been previously imposed on the petitioners. The petitioners, through counsel, …
The petitioner, Nishikant Vishwe, challenged the order of the Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee dated 03‑08‑2012 which rejected his claim to belong to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe. He argued that his genealogical ties to several relatives—Ranjak, Padmakar, Pravin and Nilesh—who had previously …
The petitioners, who purchased portions of Gut No. 127 in Jalna, sought to quash a communication dated 16‑06‑2025 issued by the Deputy Superintendent of Police (Economic Wing) directing the Sub Registrar to prohibit further transfer of the land. They argued that they were not accused under the …
The petitioner, Balaji Karhade, challenged the Scrutiny Committee's order that rejected his claim to belong to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. He relied on validity certificates issued to his blood relatives and a prior conditional validation granted to a relative in Writ Petition No. 9830 of 2023. …
The petitioner, Akash Ahok Auti, filed a writ petition seeking the issuance of a tribe certificate in the correct format, claiming he already possessed a certificate dated 23.05.2003 and only required a replacement. The respondent State, through the competent authority, had rejected the application …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of contempt petitions numbered 57/2023, 673/2023, 258/2024, 393/2023, 260/2024, 259/2024, 86/2024, 87/2024 and 897/2024. The petitioners submitted that the orders issued in the earlier contempt proceedings had been fully complied with. The Court …
The petitioners, Sonai Magasvargiya Audhyogic Utpadak Sahakari Sanstha and its president K.G. Thorat, filed a continuous petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The court had earlier passed an order of contempt against the petitioners. The petitioners complied with the contempt order, …
The petitioner, Suresh Haribhau Hajare, challenged a Scrutiny Committee order dated 04‑03‑2026 that invalidated his claim to belong to the ‘Koli Mahadev’ Scheduled Tribe. The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a tribe‑validity certificate. The Court noted that a …
The petitioner, Nitin Babanrao Shankpal, filed a writ petition challenging a Scrutiny Committee order that invalidated his claim to belong to the “Thakur” Scheduled Tribe. He relied on earlier judgments that granted conditional validity to his close blood relatives – his cousin uncle Dinesh Bapurao …
The petitioner, Pratap Mukundrao Phadke, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee to decide a complaint against Shaikh Rijwan Chotubhai expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the Committee had already issued notices to both parties, and only a …
Petitioner Rahul Sahebrao Chabukswar filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Imale Ramesh Ramdas, requested to withdraw the petition. The Court …
Mahajan Devidas Tandalwad filed a writ petition seeking direction for the speedy verification of his claim that he belongs to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe, a matter pending before the State's caste scrutiny committee since September 15, 2025. The petitioner argued that the delay adversely …
Gondibai Mukhi Pawara filed a writ petition challenging the validity certificate issued by Respondent No.3 on 23 August 2015, alleging that it was obtained through fraud on the Scrutiny Committee. The petitioner lodged a complaint with the Scrutiny Committee on 31 July 2023, but the committee failed …
The petitioner, Vaishnavi Dattatray Thakur, filed a writ petition seeking speedy disposal of her claim of belonging to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe, which had been pending before the Scrutiny Committee since 4 December 2024. She required a validity certificate to continue her studies. The High …
The petitioners, Sarthak Chaganlal Sabale and another, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the State's Scrutiny Committee to decide their claims of belonging to the Naikda Scheduled Tribe, a matter pending since 16 January 2026. They required a decision before the NEET‑UG 2026 …
The petitioner, Roshan Prabhakar Mutyepod, challenged a 10 July 2018 order of the Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. Although the petition was filed after a considerable delay, the Court required the petitioner to deposit Rs.1,00,000 to …
The petitioner, Ambadas Jotiba Pawar, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency, the petitioner informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court’s resource personnel report dated 03‑07‑2026 confirmed this status. …
The Ka Krishnarao Narayanrao Pawar Education Trust filed a petition (1000 Cont. Petition No. 717 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra challenging an order of contempt. The petitioner, through counsel, informed the court that the contempt order had been fully complied with. The court examined …
Suresh Tukaram More filed a continuous petition (No. 545 of 2016) arising out of WP/8247/2013 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner alleged that the State of Maharashtra had not complied with an earlier contempt order. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard three criminal writ petitions (Nos. 468, 469 and 470 of 2019) filed by Ashok, Pratap and Subhash respectively against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners submitted purshis dated 24‑02‑2020 stating that they had already received the …
The petitioner, a minor represented by her mother, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Scrutiny Committee to determine her claim of belonging to the ‘Koli Mahadev’ Scheduled Tribe, a matter that had been pending since 4 September 2025. The petitioner argued that a prompt decision …
The petitioner, Vandana Limbarao Ingle, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the court’s intervention to ensure effective investigation into two offences, Crime No.27/2019 and Crime No.72/2019, alleged to have been committed in Satara. The State filed a miscellaneous application (M.A. …
The petitioners, Laxmibai Pandurang More and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 273 of 2018) in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petition arose from an order of contempt that had been directed against the petitioners. The petitioners, through counsel Abhijit S. More, informed the …
The petitioner, Anil Laxman Joshi, filed a contempt petition challenging an order. The petitioner’s counsel, P. B. Salunke on behalf of Mr. Salgare Vitthal G., submitted that the contempt order had been complied with. The court examined the compliance and found no remaining issue. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Uttam Karbhari Golwad, filed a contempt petition alleging that the Scrutiny Committee, Nashik, had unduly delayed deciding his tribe claim. No counsel appeared for the petitioner. The State, represented by the Additional Government Pleader, informed the Court that the claim was still …
Vishakha and Ganpat, niece and uncle, filed writ petitions challenging a Scrutiny Committee order that invalidated their claims of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. They relied on a prior judgment (Writ Petition No.11596 of 2023) that had granted conditional validity to distant relatives …
Vaishnavi, daughter of Sanjay Suryawanshi, filed Contempt Petition No. 265 of 2026 in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, against Kiran Mali and another. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Nikita B. Bontalwar and Advocate O. B. Boinwad. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner …
Petitioner Baburao Namdeo Kirage filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the State of Maharashtra Revenue and Forest Department (Respondent No. 2) to pay compensation for land (Gut No. 156) as per an award dated 15‑02‑2024, together with interest. The respondent’s Advocate General produced a …
The petitioners, a niece and her uncle, challenged a March 19, 2025 order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee that invalidated their claim to belong to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. They relied on genealogical records and the earlier judgment in Writ Petition No.11596 of …
The petitioner, Rukmin Sonaji Totewad, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Scrutiny Committee to decide his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. He alleged that his employer had issued a show‑cause notice demanding a tribe‑validity certificate, threatening termination …
The applicant, Kashabai Dhondiba Rathod, was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment for allegedly holding the victim, Vinod, thereby enabling another accused to deliver a fatal knife blow. She appealed for suspension of the sentence and bail, arguing that her role was limited to …
The petitioner, Rauf Nyaju Patel, filed a contempt petition against Rajesh Agrawal and others, alleging non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The learned Government Pleader informed the court that the contempt order had been complied with by concluding the departmental enquiry, and the …
The petitioner, Vishnu Lekhraj Tanwani, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction that the Commissioner of Police, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, decide a complaint/representation he lodged on 30‑December‑2025. The respondent State, through its APP, indicated that the Commissioner would decide …
The petitioners, members of the Mannervarlu community, sought validation of their Scheduled Tribe status and issuance of caste certificates. Their applications were rejected by the Scrutiny Committee, prompting them to file multiple writ petitions. The Court noted that a relative, Shankar s/o Laxman …
The petitioners, members of the Surewad family, claimed belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe and sought validation of their caste certificates. Their applications were rejected by the State's Scrutiny Committee, prompting multiple writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad …
The petitioner, Shivaji Dinkarrao Jadhav, filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 209 of 2014) challenging an interim order dated 30 April 2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 3971 of 2010. The petition was scheduled for hearing, but the petitioner failed to appear even after a second call, and …
The petitioners, members of the Mannervarlu community, sought recognition as a Scheduled Tribe and validation of their caste certificates. Their applications were previously rejected by the Scrutiny Committee, prompting multiple writ petitions. The Court noted that a related petition by Shankar s/o …
The petitioner, Jameel Khan Rasool Khan, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to the police officer of Kranti Chowk Police Station to execute a conviction warrant issued by the JMFC 16th Court on 08.02.2016. The petitioner alleged that the police officer was not complying with the …
The appellant, Dr. Prajwalit Raut, filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court's Aurangabad Bench challenging a family court order. The court noted that the appellant failed to appear and that the notice issued to the respondent, Priyanka Raut, could not be served because the parties had resumed …
The petitioner, a minor represented by her father, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee to expedite the determination of his claim of belonging to the Koli Mahadev tribe. The claim had been pending since 29 May 2025, and the …
Vasant Shankarrao Kulkarni filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 575 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was presented before Judges Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav. At the request of the petitioner's …
Petitioners Pavan More and another filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 664 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. Their counsel, Mr. Akshay Wagh on behalf of Mr. Shelke Shivaji T., applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The …
Shaikh Harun Shaikh Sagir Ahmed filed a contempt petition challenging a circular dated 06‑04‑2017 (No. 344) alleging it contravened the High Court's order dated 04‑03‑2016 in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1368 of 2015. The Court examined the 2016 order and found that it contained no specific directions …
The petitioner, Abrar Muktar, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the police to arrest accused persons in two crimes, to transfer the investigations to an independent agency, and to provide protection and departmental action against police officials. The respondents …
A batch of writ petitions (Nos. 6096‑6099, 6100‑6109 of 2017) were filed against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. All petitioners' tenures had expired in 2020, rendering the subject matter of the petitions moot. The Court examined whether relief could be granted when the …
A batch of writ petitions (Nos. 6096‑6099, 6100‑6109 of 2017) were filed against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. All petitioners' tenures had expired in 2020, rendering the subject matter of the petitions moot. The Court examined whether relief could be granted when the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions filed in 2017. All petitioners were government officials whose tenures had already expired in 2020. The Court observed that since the petitioners no longer held the positions from which the relief was sought, the petitions …
A batch of writ petitions (Nos. 6096‑6099, 6100‑6109 of 2017) were filed against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. All petitioners' tenures had expired in 2020, rendering the subject matter of the petitions moot. The Court examined whether relief could be granted when the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions filed in 2017. All petitioners were government officials whose tenures had already expired in 2020. The Court observed that since the petitioners no longer held the positions from which the relief was sought, the petitions …
The petitioners filed multiple contempt petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, asserting that they had complied with the orders previously issued in each case. The petitioners, through counsel, submitted that compliance was complete for petitions numbered 57/2023, 673/2023, …
Ravi filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against a decree involving Sadhana. During the hearing, the appellant, through his counsel Mr. A.R. Gaikwad, submitted a written instruction dated 16‑06‑2026 expressing his desire to withdraw the appeal. The court recorded the …
The Bombay High Court heard Contempt Petition No. 114 of 2024 filed by Geetabai against the State of Maharashtra and its Water Resources Department. The contempt order required the respondent‑acquiring body to deposit the full compensation awarded. The body deposited only 50 % of the amount and …
The petitioners, eight primary education officers, filed a writ petition seeking orders for their transfers to non‑tribal areas. The respondents produced a communication from the Education Officer indicating eligibility for transfer but no formal order had been issued. They also submitted a …
The appellant, Priyanka, filed a Family Court Appeal which was found to be within the prescribed time limit. The respondent filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay for the appeal. The court examined the office note confirming the timely filing of the appeal. Since the appeal was …
The petitioner, Savita Parshuram Paratwad, filed a contempt petition (No. 584 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. T.S. Kotkar, informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. Accordingly, the Court held that there was no longer any …
The petitioners, Shubham Jaiprakash Pagare and others, filed a contempt petition seeking enforcement of a direction that the respondents consider their representation for a scholarship in the Aircraft Maintenance course. The Court had earlier, on 10 February 2025, granted the petitioners liberty to …
The petition was filed by the father of a 34‑year‑old woman with moderate intellectual disability who was sexually assaulted and is pregnant at 28 weeks. The petitioner sought an emergency medical board and permission for termination of pregnancy beyond the 24‑week limit, along with preservation of …
The appellant filed a Family Court Appeal seeking relief, but the parties subsequently settled their dispute and obtained a divorce by mutual consent. The appellant's counsel, on instructions, moved the court to withdraw the appeal. The court, noting the amicable settlement and the mutual consent …
The petitioners filed three contempt petitions (Nos. 305, 306, 307 of 2014) alleging that the respondents, Sanjay Kumar and others, had failed to comply with a prior contempt order. The State, through its Additional Government Pleaders, filed affidavits stating that the contempt order had been fully …
The appellant, X.Y.Z., filed a complaint alleging that on 5 June 2016 the accused entered her home, assaulted her mother with an iron rod, pressed her breast, tore her clothes and threatened them. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the prosecution evidence unreliable. On appeal, the High …
The petitioner, a minor represented by his father, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Scrutiny Committee to decide his claim of belonging to the Thakur Scheduled Tribe, a claim pending since October 2025. He needed the decision before the NEET 2027 examination. The State, …
The petitioner, Ravindra Prakash Gavali, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the Scrutiny Committee to decide his claim of belonging to the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe, a claim he had submitted on 23‑12‑2016. He argued that without a validity certificate, his employer would withhold …
Petitioner Kailas Sundarrao Sudewad filed a writ petition seeking a direction that his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe be decided promptly, arguing that the lack of a validity certificate was preventing his promotion. The petitioner contended that the Scrutiny Committee had not …
Rajabhau alias Rajendra Digambar Mane filed a criminal writ petition challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The court noted that the petitioner has a pending appeal before the In‑charge Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, scheduled for hearing on 14‑07‑2026. The learned Attorney …
The petitioner, Junaid Ahmedkhan, filed writ petition No. 7000 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, through counsel Mr. G. B. Patunkar on behalf of Mr. Vibhute Sunil M., the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition unconditionally. The sole question before the …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashing of FIR No. 79/2021 registered at Ardhapur Police Station and a restraining order against the respondents from filing a charge-sheet. The Court noted that, following the FIR, a criminal case (R.C.C. No. 131/2021) had already been …
The petitioner, a blind victim, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a court direction for the police inspector to record her supplementary statement in Crime No.133 of 2026. The respondent State argued that such a direction could be issued to the investigating officer. The Court agreed, directing …
Petitioner Parmeshwar Bhaidas Deore filed a contempt petition against Nivedita Ved Singhal and others. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the respondents filed a reply indicating that the order in the contempt proceedings had been complied with. The Court examined the reply and found that …
The State of Maharashtra, through its AGP, filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw statements recorded in earlier orders of Writ Petition No. 7098 of 2015. The applicant requested that the writ petition be treated as withdrawn, effectively disposing of the matter. The court, after …
The petitioner, Arjun Uddhav Kale, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the filing of an ‘A’ Summary Report in FIR No. 30 of 2018 registered at Karjat Police Station. The investigating officer had submitted the summary report, which was pending before the competent court for final orders. The …
The petitioners, Atmaram Pandurang Totewad and Rohidas Vishnudas Totewad (father and guardian), challenged a judgment dated 16 June 2025 of the Scrutiny Committee that invalidated their claim of belonging to the “Koli Mahadev” Scheduled Tribe. Their brother, Shravan Vishnudas Totewad, had earlier …
The appellant Nandabai filed a complaint alleging that her daughter Bhagyashree was harassed by her husband Parmeshwar and his family for additional dowry, culminating in them forcibly administering poison which caused Bhagyashree’s death. The trial court acquitted the accused of offences under …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of Namdeo, who was charged under IPC Sections 307, 324 and 504 read with Section 34 for allegedly assaulting an informant and his mother during a dispute over mangoes. The prosecution relied on the dying declaration of the injured informant and …
Petitioner Nirjala Punja... filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra alleging that the Scrutiny Committee failed to decide her proposal within the time limit prescribed by the Court. The Court noted that the Committee had been divided into two parts, which caused the delay, and …
The petitioner, Uma Kalyansinha Rajput, filed a contempt petition (No. 579 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. T.S. Kotkar, informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the court held that there was …
The petitioner, Chandrakala Baburao Mekale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the Scrutiny Committee's order dated 30.07.2021 that rejected her claim of belonging to the 'Koli Mahadev' Scheduled Tribe. She argued that her father Devanand Mekale's genealogy and the conditional …
The petitioners, represented by Mr. Shaikh Ashraf Patel and Mr. Abhijeet P. Avhad, filed a contempt petition (992 Cont. Petition No. 410 of 2014) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The counsel submitted that the purpose of the petition had been fully subserved and that there was nothing …
Petitioner Jaidrath Mahadeo Gaikwad filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 373 of 2014) against V. Giriraj, Secretary, Rural Development and Water Conservation Department, Mumbai and others. The petition sought relief on the ground of alleged contempt of court. The learned counsel …
The High Court noted that the Scrutiny Committee, tasked by an earlier contempt order to determine the petitioners' caste claims, failed to decide within the prescribed time. The State’s Additional Government Pleader informed the Court that the Vigilance Cell report was still pending, requiring at …
The petitioner, Ganesh Mahadeo Pawar, filed two criminal writ petitions (Nos. 1000 and 1017 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw petition No. 1017, which the court accepted, resulting in its withdrawal and disposal. The court then …
The appellant‑informant, Sheetal Patil, challenged the acquittal of her husband and in‑laws in a 2018 Sessions case involving alleged domestic violence, arson and attempted murder. She alleged that the accused demanded Rs.5,00,000, abused her, and on 2 May 2016 poured petrol on her and incited her …
Kunal Mohanrao Kale filed a contempt petition (No. 713 of 2025) against Ranjitsinh Krushnaji Nimbalkar in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner, through counsel, submitted that the order passed under contempt had been fully complied with. The court examined the submission and …
The petitioner, Sunita Shinde, filed a criminal writ petition seeking transfer of the investigation of FIR No. 113/2020 registered at Kurunda Police Station, Hingoli. The Court examined a report from its Resource Personnel dated 05.08.2026, which indicated that a Special Case No. 20/2021 had already …
The petitioners, Dusane Education Society and others, filed Contempt Petition No. 600 of 2018 seeking time concerning an order under contempt related to a 2017 approval proposal. The petition was heard by a bench of Justice Sandipkumar C. More and Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde. Counsel for the …
The petitioner, Pralhad Jadhav, filed a criminal writ petition which, on his counsel’s instruction, was reported to have become infructuous. The court, after confirming the Resource Personnel’s report dated 03‑07‑2026, held that the petition stands disposed. No substantive factual or legal issues …
Petitioner Sharda Rajendra Aajbe filed a contempt petition (No. 572 of 2019) against the Secretary of the Maharashtra State Higher and Technical Education Mantralaya. The petitioner, through counsel, submitted that the order under contempt had been complied with. The court, after noting this …
The petitioner, Jyoti Namdevrao More, filed a contempt petition challenging the alleged non‑compliance of a court direction to the Education Officer (Primary) to decide his proposal dated 26‑02‑2018. The court examined the order dated 24‑10‑2019, which showed that the Education Officer had indeed …
In a family court appeal, the appellant (husband) sought leave to withdraw the appeal on the basis that the parties had amicably settled their dispute and intended to live separately. The court considered the request for withdrawal. No substantive issues on the merits were addressed. The court …
The petition filed by Young Boys Educational and Industrial Circle through its President was not presented before the court, leading to a dismissal for want of prosecution. The accompanying civil application was also dismissed. No substantive hearing on the merits took place. The court noted that …
The petitioner, Pralhad Nagorao Lolamwad, challenged a judgment of the Scrutiny Committee that denied his claim to belong to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. He argued that the same order had been successfully contested by other claimants in Writ Petition No. 10052 of 2025, resulting in a …
Adesh Raju Bhosale filed Writ Petition No. 10300 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was initially not taken on board, but the Court later decided to take it on board. The Court observed that the petitioner …
Petitioner Jayram filed a writ petition seeking relief concerning the disability certification of his minor daughter. The High Court ordered the petitioner to appear before a Medical Officer for the examination of the child. The petitioner complied, and the child was examined as directed. The Court …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of Shaikh Nasir Shaikh Saheblal, who was charged under Section 409 IPC for alleged misappropriation of Rs.88,030.70 while serving as secretary of a cooperative society. The accused failed to produce the cash during an audit but later deposited the …
The petitioner, Govind Taterao Suryawanshi, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent (the court handling his appeal) to decide his pending appeal, which has been outstanding since 14 July 2026. The petition raised the issue of undue delay in the disposal of the appeal. …
Petitioners Vasant Atamaram Bhise and others filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra. The respondents filed a reply stating that they had complied with the contempt order. The petitioners, through counsel, sought further relief. The Court examined the compliance claim and found it …
The High Court considered two criminal applications filed by the original accused in Special Case No. 113 of 2023, seeking suspension of their life and term sentences and bail pending appeal. The accused were convicted under Sections 376‑D, 376‑DA, 363, 366 of the IPC, Section 34, and Sections 4 and …
The petitioners, Dadaji Harchand Patil and others, filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 403 of 2014) against the State of Maharashtra. The petition alleged that an order under contempt had not been complied with. The petitioner's counsel, on instruction, submitted that the contempt order …
The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents had not fixed their revised pay as ordered. Respondent No.3 produced a communication dated 13.01.2026 stating that the revised pay, including advance increment, would be fixed under the 6th and 7th Pay Commissions and that the …
Shirdi Nagar Panchayat filed a contempt petition alleging that land owners had violated an interim order dated 25 April 2018, which restrained any physical development on disputed open and amenity plots. The interim order was issued in the original Writ Petition No. 3805 of 2018, which, along with …
The petitioners, BHAURAO SHRIPATI PAWAR alias POKALE and another, filed a contempt petition seeking rental compensation. The respondents submitted an affidavit indicating that interest under Sections 34 and 28 had already been paid to the farmers, rendering them ineligible for further rental …
The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra had failed to pay rental compensation ordered on 03/11/2015. The respondents, through their Advocate General, submitted that the compensation order had already been issued and that directions for payment had been given …
The petitioner, Ravindra Ukhdu Salve, filed a contempt petition (Cont. Petition No. 512 of 2014) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order of contempt had been fully complied with. The court examined the submission and found that there was no …
Swapnil ChandraKant Karankale filed a contempt petition (No. 738 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner alleged that a prior contempt order had not been complied with. The petitioner’s counsel submitted an affidavit …
The appellant, Jayesh Dayaram Gangawane, was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment for stabbing his sister's husband, Arbaj, on 3 February 2023. He filed an application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending his appeal, alleging that the trial court erred in relying on …
The petitioner, Anil Bhagwan Shirsath, filed a continuation petition (No. 147 of 2016) seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition concerned a proposal dated 17 June 2013 that the court had earlier directed to be decided. On 3 June 2016 the court issued an order deciding …
Petitioner Vaijinath Dattaram Byagalwar claimed membership in the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. The Scrutiny Committee invalidated his claim on 10 July 2018 after a Vigilance Cell report was submitted on 3 July 2018, but the petitioner was not provided a copy of the report nor an opportunity to file …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition challenging the investigation of a crime. The Superintendent of Police issued an order on 22 April 2026 transferring the investigation to the E.W.O. Wing, Ahilyanagar. The court observed that this transfer fulfilled the petitioners' purpose for filing …
The petitioner, Rutik Panjabi, challenged a detention order dated 24‑06‑2025 issued by the District Magistrate under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act (MPDA Act). Although the petitioner faced multiple pending criminal cases and had been released on bail for one …
The appellant, Himmat Patil, appealed against the acquittal of twelve accused in a 2016 Sessions case involving offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307, 324, 325 and 149 IPC. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted the victims with sticks, an iron rod, an axe and a sword on 14 February …
In Contempt Petition No. 742 of 2015 arising out of WP/10066/2014, the petitioners alleged that the respondents had not paid the compensation due to them. The learned Additional Government Pleader initially claimed the petitioners were not coming to accept the compensation, but later produced …
The petitioner, Pravin Vasantrao Pawar, filed a criminal writ petition (No. 1528 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The court, after reviewing the report of its Resource Personnel, noted that a charge-sheet in the underlying …
The petitioner, Matoshree Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Ashok R. Kachole, filed a contempt petition alleging non‑compliance with a court direction to start Class‑VIII for the academic year 2025‑2026. Respondents, including the State and several officials, submitted a letter dated 26‑11‑2025 confirming …
The petitioners, Nilesh Rajendra Tarkase and another, filed a contempt petition in 2017 but failed to engage any counsel despite ample opportunity. The Court observed that the petitioners showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition on the ground of …
Sharda Rajendra Aajbe filed a contempt petition against the Secretary of the Maharashtra State Higher and Technical Education Mantralaya. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order under contempt had been complied with. The court, after noting compliance, disposed of the contempt petition …
The petitioner, Sandip Shrikant Ahire, challenged a 24 May 2017 order of the Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his claim to belong to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe, relying solely on the affinity test and area restriction. He submitted pre‑independence documents (1938, 1919, 1925, 1934) showing his …
The petitioner, Seema Raju Pol, filed a contempt petition alleging that Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and others failed to comply with a court order dated 09/03/2016 directing the reassessment of her marks. The High Court examined whether the respondents had complied with the contempt order. It …
The petitioner, Sheetal Bhagwan Chaudhari, filed a petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was being heard when a subsequent event occurred that rendered the relief sought no longer applicable. On instructions, the petitioner's counsel informed the …
The petition (Contempt Petition No. 983 of 2025) was filed by Ravindra Dhondu Gawali against Minal Karanwal. The petitioner sought relief from an order of contempt that had been previously issued. The respondent/State was represented by Mrs. M.N. Ghanekar and the other respondents by Mr. V.V. Gujar. …
The petitioner challenged his preventive detention order dated 28‑08‑2025, issued under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981, on the ground that the detaining authority had not established a live link between the alleged offences and a threat to public order, nor recorded …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Finance Establishments) Act, 1999, originally in 2018. When the matter was called, the original counsel, Mr. Rahul G. Joshi, withdrew his instructions, and a replacement counsel, Mr. …
The petitioner, AU Small Finance Bank Ltd, filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra authorities had failed to hand over possession of a property despite a prior court order dated 16/09/2025. The court noted that the respondent's Advocate General indicated that possession …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered a series of contempt petitions (Nos. 57/2023, 673/2023, 258/2024, 393/2023, 260/2024, 259/2024, 86/2024, 87/2024 and 897/2024) arising from various civil matters. Petitioners submitted that they had complied with the orders previously issued in …
The petitioner, Shantaram Tryabak Apar, filed a continuous petition (No. 893 of 2025) seeking relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The court had previously directed that a certain amount be paid to the petitioner. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Badribishan A. Darak, informed …
The petitioner, original complainant in a criminal case (R.C.C. No.3 of 2018), filed a writ petition seeking an expeditious disposal of the pending trial within one year. The petition highlighted that the case, over five years old, had seen repeated absences of the accused and numerous hearings on a …
The petitioner, Sachin Vyankatrao Keshavshetty, filed a criminal writ petition against the Collector, Osmanabad. The High Court observed that the petition could not be entertained because a related civil suit (R.C.S. No. 467 of 2016) was pending. The petitioner failed to clarify the status of that …
Shivshankar Haribhau Ingale, originally accused No.2 in a murder case, filed an application seeking suspension of his life imprisonment sentence and release on bail pending appeal. The prosecution alleged that Ingale, along with two others, murdered Krushna, relying primarily on a confessional …
The petitioner, Shubham Arvind Patil, filed a contempt petition (No. 872 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, asserted that the order under contempt had been fully complied with and that no further relief was required. The respondent, represented by the …
Petitioner Sambhaji Vaijinath Bedade filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents alleging non-payment of salary arrears. Respondent No.4, the District Social Welfare Officer, submitted a letter confirming that Respondent No.6 had forwarded the petitioner's …
In Contempt Petition No. 742 of 2015 arising out of WP/10066/2014, the petitioners alleged that the respondents had not paid the compensation due to them. The Attorney General initially claimed the petitioners were not coming to accept the compensation, but later produced receipts (identified as …
The petitioner, Shahista Moin Sheikh, filed a criminal writ petition challenging a ‘B’ summary report filed by the Investigating Officer. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file a protest petition against the summary report. The Court …
Yogirao Nivrutti Gawandi filed a contempt petition (No. 817 of 2019) against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner alleged that an order of contempt had been passed against the State. The petitioner’s counsel, R. V. Gunale, submitted that the State had complied with the contempt order. The bench …
The petitioners, Manohar Indrabhans Sarode and others, filed two continuation petitions challenging a contempt order. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, were represented by Ms. M.N. Ghanekar. The petitioners complied with the contempt order, as acknowledged by their counsel. On …
The petitioner, Ramesh Onkar Thakur, challenged the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his claim of belonging to the “Thakur” Scheduled Tribe. He submitted pre‑constitution documents dated 1926 and 1932, which the Committee discarded, insisting on an …
The petitioner, Sameer Ali Gulam Ali Makrani, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Adv. Rupesh A. Jaiswal, requested the withdrawal of the petition. The …
The petitioner, Sanjay Narsingrao Wadikar, filed a contempt petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Tukaram Maruti Venjane, informed the court that the order of contempt had been complied with. The court noted that with compliance, there was no …
The petitioner, Venkatesh Bapurao Kulkarni, filed Contempt Petition No. 843 of 2019 against Osmanabad District Central Co‑op Bank Ltd. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order of contempt had been fully complied with. The Court, after hearing the submission, held that there was no longer …
Ashok Manikrao Khamkar and another filed a petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief regarding their seniority. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, were represented by Ms. M.N. Ghanekar. The Advocate General submitted that the seniority issue had already been decided on …
The petitioner, Chandrakant Sukhadey Bhotkar, claimed membership in the ‘Koli Malhar’ Scheduled Tribe, a claim pending before the Scrutiny Committee since May 2013. During this pendency, his employer issued a show‑cause notice demanding a tribe validity certificate, threatening termination of his …
The petitioner, who was the original informant in a 2021 sessions case arising from a land dispute, sought the appointment of a Special Public Prosecutor, alleging that the regular prosecutor was not prosecuting diligently and that the accused were influential. The respondent, a law department …
The petitioner, Prashant Bharat Kshirsagar, filed a continuous petition seeking relief concerning arrears of salary. The High Court directed the respondent State of Maharashtra to pay the arrears. On 20 June 2026, the petitioner submitted a communication confirming receipt of the salary arrears in …
Swapnali Balasaheb Dabhade, a government employee, filed a writ petition seeking a direction that her pending claim of belonging to the Buddha caste be verified by the Scrutiny Committee. She feared that a delay in the verification could lead to termination of her service. The Court considered the …
Petitioner Rajendra Bapurao Hande filed a contempt petition alleging that Respondent No.2 violated an interim order dated 5 September 2019 by issuing a letter on 13 September 2019 allotting a retail outlet to the original Respondent No.3 in Writ Petition No. 9974 of 2019. Respondent No.2 contended …
