Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
354 judgments · newest first · showing 201–354
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 405 of 2018, which arose from a criminal case under IPC sections 354, 504, 506 and POCSO Act sections 7/8, and to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) and the proceedings under …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, their counsel expressed a desire not to pursue the petition further and requested its dismissal as not pressed. The Court accepted this request, dismissing the petition on the ground that it was not pressed, …
The applicant, Chaturbhuji Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 593 of 2025, which arose from a charge under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003 relating to alleged …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Rajesh Kumar Pandey, informed the court that the petitioners no longer wish to pursue the writ and requested its dismissal. The court considered the request to withdraw the petition. It held that the petition could …
The petitioners, Simran Sharma and another, filed a writ petition alleging that their marriage was recognized by their parents and that there was no danger to their lives. Their counsel submitted that the petition was not being pressed and requested its dismissal. The respondents, the State of U.P. …
Petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners' counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and not press it further. The court considered the request for withdrawal. It dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it was not …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 181 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 50 of 2025, which involved charges under various sections of the BNSS and the POCSO Act. The application was presented before the Hon'ble …
The applicant, Surendra Kumar Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act) in Varanasi. He contended that he was already on bail when the NBW was issued and that the court had not served any …
The applicant, Anshul Alias Kavi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS (2023) seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 17192/9 of 2025) arising from a charge under Sections 3, 5 and 25 of the Arms Act in Muzaffarnagar. The application was intended to halt the case pending …
Petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel later informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the petition and requested its dismissal. The court accepted this request and dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it was not pressed, while granting the …
Petitioners Kajal Devi and another filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel informed the court that a First Information Report (FIR) had already been lodged in the matter. The court held that the filing of …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1814 of 2024) arising from offences under IPC Section 354 and Sections 7/8 of the POCSO Act. The court noted that the applicant had earlier …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 249 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 74, 351(3) of the BNSS and Sections 7 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash an order dated 27‑08‑2025 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, which had rejected a request to release a vehicle. The application was presented before Hon'ble Justice …
The applicant, Piyush Trivedi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 6421 of 2020) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etawah, which involved offences under IPC Sections 153A and …
The applicant, Dvarika Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Case No. 2619 of 2017, which were instituted under Section 461 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Indian Telegraph Act. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 3401 of 2025, which arose from a criminal complaint involving offences under the BNSS, the POCSO Act and the Juvenile Justice Act. After hearing, the …
Ramcharan filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 503 of 2007, which involved alleged violations of Sections 135 and 138 of the Electricity Act. The application was filed after a preliminary order for framing …
The applicant, Yogendra Pratap alias Shekhar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared for the applicant on the revised call, while the State's brief holder was present. The court noted the applicant's failure to prosecute the …
Petitioners Kajal and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide protection for their life and liberty. The petition also requested liberty …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 326 of 2024 arising from a POCSO and IPC offences case. The application challenged the cognizance and summoning order dated 28.10.2024 …
Petitioners Muskan and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared before the Court on the scheduled date or on the revised list, despite the presence of the Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. The Court noted the petitioners' non‑appearance and …
Petitioners Smt. Himanshi and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioners failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled date and also on the revised list dated 22 April 2026, while the Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the …
The applicant, Sanjeev Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a September 2024 order of the Special Judge that dismissed his request for release of money in a narcotics trial. The order being challenged related to Session Trial No. …
The applicant, Vikram Mehta, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a specific relief. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Sanjay Kumar Pachori. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to pursue the matter, although the learned …
Petitioners Priya Kashyap and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. Their counsel submitted that the petitioners' parents had agreed to and recognized their marriage and that there was no threat to the petitioners' …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 550 of 2025, which arose from an alleged offence under Section 325 of the same Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The applicant …
Petitioners Smt. Priti Singh and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled dates of 31 March 2026, 22 April 2026, and again on 6 May 2026, despite being listed. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State appeared, but …
Petitioners Smt. Puja and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed but the petitioners failed to appear on the scheduled dates, including the revised list on 22 April 2026. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State appeared, but no petitioner …
The petitioners, Smt. Vijyabharti and her husband, married after attaining majority and applied for online registration of their marriage. They alleged that a private respondent (No. 4) threatened them and interfered with their marital life, seeking a writ of mandamus under Article 226 to prevent …
The petitioners, Smt. Kumari Lakshmi and her spouse, married after attaining majority and applied for online registration of their marriage. They alleged that a private respondent (No. 4) threatened them and interfered with their marital life, prompting them to seek a writ of mandamus under Article …
The petitioners, Smt. Sapna and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from alleged interference by respondent No.4. The State counsel informed the Court that an FIR had already been …
The applicant, Mohd Salman, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 38472 of 2023) arising from offences under IPC Section 420 and IT Act Sections 66 and 66D. He argued that he had not been arrested and that the charge‑sheet had …
The applicant, Premlata, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking permission to appear for trial without being taken into physical custody in a criminal case involving offences under Section 318(4) of the B.N.S. Act and Section 66D of the I.T. Act. The applicant argued that he had …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mathura, in a case under Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he was already on bail when the NBW was …
The applicant, Sudarshan Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 183 of 2026, which stemmed from Crime No. 387 of 2025 involving offences under Sections 74 and 352 of the B.N.S. and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The …
The petitioners, Pooja Angad Shukla and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief, presumably related to their marriage. Their counsel submitted that the petitioners’ parents have recognized the marriage and there is no threat to the petitioners’ lives. The …
Petitioners Smt. Safiya Khatoon and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel later informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the petition. The counsel specifically requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, while seeking liberty to file a …
Petitioners Smt. Maya and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from a third respondent. The State counsel informed the Court that an FIR relating to the dispute had already been lodged …
Petitioners Smt. Maya Devi and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and others. The petitioners failed to appear before the court despite being listed in the revised roster, while the Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide protection for their life and liberty. During the hearing, the petitioners …
The petitioners, Smt. Shelja and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from respondent No.4. The State informed the Court that an FIR had been lodged concerning the same matter and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide protection against alleged threats. The petition also requested liberty to file a fresh …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel later informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the petition. The petitioner sought a dismissal of the writ as not pressed, with liberty to file a fresh petition if desired. The court considered the request …
Suraj Mahato filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ghazipur, despite being on bail at the time. He contended that the warrant was issued without any prior summons or bailable warrant and that the …
The petitioners, Shivani and another, filed a writ petition under Section 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from a third party. The State informed the Court that an FIR had already been lodged concerning the matter and …
The petitioners, Smt. Pooja Yadav and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection for their life and liberty. The petition also requested …
The petitioners, Nazrin @ Nazreen Bano and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from alleged harassment by respondents No.4 to 7. The State informed the Court that an FIR had already …
The petitioners, Smt. Radha and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from a fourth respondent. The State counsel informed the court that an FIR had already been lodged concerning …
Petitioners Sapna and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from alleged interference by respondent No.5. The State counsel informed the Court that an FIR had already been lodged …
The petitioners, Soniya Vankhede and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection. The petitioners admitted that they had married without …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court and later informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the petition. They requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to file a fresh petition if desired. The court accepted the request and dismissed …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 7784 of 2025) arising under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. During the hearing, the …
The petitioners, Smt. Mehar Jahan and another, filed a writ petition under Section 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to protect their peaceful matrimonial life from respondent No.4. The State counsel informed the court that an FIR had already been lodged …
Petitioners Shivani and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection. Their counsel later expressed that they did not wish to pursue the present petition and sought liberty …
The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their relationship and to provide protection against harassment. The petitioners admitted they were in a live-in relationship without a prior …
The applicant, Majid, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 02‑08‑2011 issued by the Special Judge (Gangsters Act) in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that he was already on …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 14648 of 2024) arising from a charge under Section 67B of the Income Tax Act. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested and that the charge‑sheet had already been …
The petitioners, Smt. Shivani Devi and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled dates of 17‑02‑2026, 22‑04‑2026 and again on 06‑05‑2026, despite the court’s revised lists. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State …
The petitioners, Tayra Khatoon and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled dates of 17 February 2026, 22 April 2026, and again on 6 May 2026, despite being listed. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State appeared, …
The petitioners, Smt. Priyanki and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled dates of 17 February 2026, 22 April 2026, and again on 6 May 2026, despite being listed. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State appeared, …
The petitioners, Smt. Anita and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear for hearing on the original date and on two subsequent dates (17‑02‑2026 and 22‑04‑2026) despite being listed. The respondent State, represented by the Additional Chief Standing …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The applicant failed to appear before the court even after a revised call on 6 January 2025. The State's brief holder, Shri B.N. Upadhyay, was present, but no representation was made for the …
The applicant, Abdul Kareem, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. Both parties failed to appear for the hearing, and even the revised call saw no representation from the applicant, though a brief holder for the State was present. The court noted the …
Petitioners Smt. Ratana Sonkar and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled dates of 17-02-2026, 22-04-2026 and again on 06-05-2026, despite the court issuing revised lists. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State …
The petitioners, Husna and another, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR lodged against them. The learned Standing Counsel, A. K. Singh, informed the court that the FIR had indeed been registered. The court examined the petition and found that the matter had become moot because the FIR was …
The applicant, Radhey Shyam Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in a narcotics case (NDPS Act, §§8,21) where he was already on bail. He contended that the NBW was issued without first …
The petitioners Yashika Babbar and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the fourth respondent not to interfere with their peaceful conjugal life and the second respondent to ensure their safety and security. The petition was argued before the High Court of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction that the State not take any coercive action against them in their matrimonial life and to provide security for the same. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed that the petitioner no …
The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship and have not obtained a divorce decree from a prior marriage, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel admitted the facts and expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, stating that it should be dismissed as not pressed. …
The applicant, Ritik Kumar Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash an order dated 23 March 2026 passed by the District Magistrate of Mau in Criminal Case No. 2303 of 2025. The impugned order related to offences under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Animal …
Petitioners Smt Valiya Gaur and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Mahmudul Hasan, later informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the petition. The petition was therefore not pressed before the court. The court considered whether it could dismiss …
Petitioners Smt. Rashmi Maurya and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel later informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the petition and sought its dismissal as not pressed. The court considered the request for withdrawal and, finding no objection, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of a POCSO case (Special Case No. 900 of 2025) pending before the Special Judge, Kasganj. After hearing, the applicants' counsel indicated that they no longer …
The applicant, a juvenile, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 144 of 2025 pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Ghaziabad, which involved offences under the Protection of Children from …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 122 of 2025) arising under Section 74 of the same Act and Sections 7 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences …
The applicant, Sanjay Kumar Patel, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 893 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 506 and 354‑A of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 693 of 2021) arising from offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. After hearing, the applicants indicated they no longer wished to pursue …
The applicant, Ashok, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1917 of 2020) arising from alleged offences under Sections 354, 354‑B, 506 of the IPC and Sections 9 and 10 of the POCSO Act. …
The applicant, Pushpendra Kumar Alias Dev, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 393 of 2024) arising from a POCSO case involving offences under Sections 363, 354, 323, 34 of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 784 of 2018) arising under Sections 66-D, 66-E and 67 of the Information Technology Act. The court noted that the charge‑sheet had already been …
The applicant, Ashok Dangi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1232 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 354-A, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. After hearing, …
The applicants, Arshad Ali and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 923 of 2025, which arose from a criminal case under Section 135 of the Electricity Act. During the hearing, the …
The applicants, Shoyab and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 2394 of 2023) arising from Crime No. 107 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 363, 366A, 120B of the IPC and Sections 16/17 of the POCSO Act. …
The applicants, Krishna Mohan Shukla and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS against the State of U.P. and another party. The applicants failed to appear before the court on the original date and also on the revised call dated 28 April 2025. The learned Additional …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and others not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel indicated that they no longer wished to pursue the present petition and sought liberty to file a fresh …
The petitioners, Rinki Kumari and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2 and No.3 not to interfere with the petitioners' peaceful life as alleged to be caused by respondents No.4 to No.7. The petition alleged that the respondents …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and others not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel indicated that they no longer wished to pursue the present petition and requested liberty to file a fresh …
The petitioners, Shweta Nishad and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents No.2 and No.3 not to interfere with their peaceful life in relation to respondent No.4. The petition alleged that such interference was occurring and requested the court's intervention. The …
The petitioners, Smt Neelam and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the present petition and seek liberty to …
The petitioners, Km. Anjali and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others not to interfere with their peaceful marital life. After hearing, the petitioners' counsel indicated they no longer wished to pursue the present petition and sought liberty to …
Petitioners Smt. Anjali and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide protection against alleged threats. The petition also requested …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 53 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 363 and 366-A of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, as well as a pending order of …
The applicant, Mohd Aajam, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. The applicant's counsel, Rajesh Kumar Kanojia, failed to appear even after a revised call. Counsel for the respondents, including the U.P. …
The applicant, Satyendra Kumar Srivastava, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. The matter was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant even after the revised call, while the State's …
The appellant Munnalal appealed against the acquittal of respondents Suraj Bhan and others on charges of criminal breach of trust under Sections 406 and 408 IPC. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code. During the pendency of the appeal, the two respondents died, as …
The applicant, Deepanshu Mittal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS (2023) seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 253 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 693 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 75, 77, 352, 351(2) of the BNS and Sections 66E & 67 of the …
The petitioners, Smt Shaloni and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. It was admitted that petitioner No.1 was in a live-in relationship with petitioner No.2, without any decree of …
A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by Rihana and another seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents not to interfere with their peaceful life and to provide protection. The petitioners sought orders to prevent harassment and ensure their safety. During the hearing, …
The petitioners, Roshani Diwakar and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. The petition was presented before Hon'ble Justice Sanjay Kumar Pachori. After hearing, the petitioners, through …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a seizure and forfeiture order dated 05‑02‑2026, which had been passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Special Judge POCSO Act) in Criminal Case No. 171 of 2026. The order was based on multiple …
The petitioners, Smt. Anamika Maurya and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking an ad interim mandamus to restrain the respondents from interfering in their marital life. They also requested a direction to respondent No.4 not to harass them. During the hearing, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS (2023) seeking to quash a seizure and forfeiture order dated 16 March 2026, which had been issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 107(4) of the B.N.S. in a cyber‑crime case. After hearing, the applicants indicated that …
Petitioners Sakshi Chaurasia and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection for their life and liberty. The petition also requested liberty to file a fresh …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the present petition and obtain liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court considered …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and others not to harass them and interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the present petition and obtain liberty to file a fresh petition. The …
The petitioners, Smt Tanya Pathak and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and others not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel indicated that they no longer wished to pursue the present petition and …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State and others not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. After hearing, the petitioners' counsel indicated they no longer wished to pursue the present petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to harass them and interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel indicated that they no longer wished to pursue the present petition and sought liberty to file a fresh …
The applicant Ankit filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's inherent powers. The court noted that service of notice on the second opposite party was still pending. It directed the office to issue a reminder to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, …
The applicant, Ashutosh Kumar Pathak, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 433 of 2025, which involved charges under Sections 50, 354(gha) IPC, Sections 11/12 of the POCSO Act, and Section 67(b) …
An application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Santosh Kumar Dhangar. Counsel for the applicant, Kamlesh Kumar Singh and Vivek Kushwaha, appeared, but the applicant himself was not present to prosecute the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate was …
The applicant, Jaipal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the charge‑framing order dated 25 March 2019 passed by the Sessions Judge, Shamli, which had framed charges under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, although the learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted the absence of the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amroha, on 18‑Jan‑2021 in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The …
The petitioners, Ranjana and another, filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petitioners failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State was present. The Hon’ble Justice Sanjay Kumar …
The applicant, Gulab Usmani, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking release from custody in eight criminal cases where bail had been granted but he could not furnish the required sureties. He contended that the cases were based on confessional statements, which he argued were …
An application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was filed by Akash against the State of U.P. and three others. The applicant's counsel, Satya Prakash Singh, was present but the applicant himself was not. The opposing counsel, G.A., appeared before the court. The bench, noting the …
The applicants, Dinesh and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 11304 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad. They argued that they had not been arrested and that a charge‑sheet had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 33 of 2026) arising from offences under various IPC sections. They argued that they had not been arrested and that the charge‑sheet had already been filed, with the alleged …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 8480 of 2025) arising from an FIR dated 27.08.2024. The charge‑sheet had already been filed against them, though they had not been arrested, and the alleged offences carried …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 911 of 2025) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Jaunpur, arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. They argued that they had not been …
The applicant, Sanyogita Rao, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 21255 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 307 and 212 of the IPC. During the hearing, the applicant’s …
The applicant, Sonu @ Abhishek, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 16962 of 2025) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra. The application alleged that the proceedings arising from offences under …
The applicant, Pradeped Kumar Sirohi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 585 of 2025) pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Ghaziabad. He argued that he was never arrested and that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the proceedings of Criminal Case Nil of 2025, which originated from Crime No. 37 of 2025. The contention was that the cognizance order issued by the Judicial Magistrate was undated and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 1825 of 2023) and a non‑bailable warrant issued against them while they were on bail. They contended that the warrant was issued without first …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.4217 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur. They argued that they had not been arrested and that the charge‑sheet …
The applicants, Ramji Verma and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a 28 September 2012 order of the Sessions Judge, Chandauli, which had affirmed the dismissal of a release application in Crime No. 319 of 2011. After hearing, …
The applicant, Govind, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release from four separate criminal cases by furnishing a single personal bond and two sureties. The four cases involved offences under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. and one case under …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Ramesh Yadav and another seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 294 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia, which involved charges …
The applicant, Pawan Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Session Judge in a criminal case (Sections 363, 366, 504 IPC). He argued that the warrant was issued without first …
The applicant, Rajeev Ahirwar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 47306 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 281 and 106(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 279 and 304-A of the IPC. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 246 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the same Act. The counsel argued that the applicants had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the order dated 20 January 2026 of the Sessions Judge, Baghpat, which had dismissed their preliminary objection to the framing of charge in a criminal case under Sections 109(1) and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 15187 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bijnor. The application aimed to nullify the cognizance and summoning order dated …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Crime No. 186 of 2024) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur. The charges involved Sections 115(2), 351 and 352 of the same Act. …
The applicant, Deepak @ Madan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 2149 of 2023) arising from alleged offences under Sections 323 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant admitted …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 76152 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 354‑Kha and 325 of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 4499 of 2022) filed by the State of U.P. under IPC sections 147, 148, 323, 504 and 506. They argued that they had not been arrested and that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, …
The applicant, Kishan Pal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 42 of 2021, Crime No. 256 of 2020) pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur, which involved offences under IPC sections …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire proceedings in State vs Horilal (Case No. 413 of 2025) arising from a crime case under multiple sections of the BNS. The applicant argued that he was never arrested and that the charge‑sheet had been filed …
The applicant, Shri Vishal Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 1315 of 2024, which arose from a criminal case under Sections 115(2), 352 and 117(2) of the BNSS. The application was presented before the High Court of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the summons order in Criminal Case No. 11978 of 2024. They contended that the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate had issued the order on a printed proforma, merely filling in blanks …
The applicant, Tribeni, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a direction for a fresh, independent investigation into the death of a deceased person in Crime No.0485 of 2024, Police Station Kothibhar, District Maharajganj. The application alleged that the local police might be …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 560 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the same Act. They argued that they had not been arrested and that the …
The applicant, Sonu Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 10 July 2025 and the entire proceedings of Crime No. 66 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 411, 413, 414 and 420 of the IPC. The application was filed before the High …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 315 of 2026) arising from a charge‑sheet filed under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 333 and 324(4) of the BNS. The counsel argued that the applicants had not been arrested and the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and related proceedings issued in criminal case No. 1476 of 2010. The applicant contended that he was on bail when the warrant was issued and that no summons or …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 45720 of 2025) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur, where they were charged under several provisions of the same Act. The applicants …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj in criminal case No. 3281 of 2021 (IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 506). The …
The applicant, Aniruddh Alias Raja Alias Mama, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking release in seven pending criminal cases on the basis of a personal bond and two sureties. He argued that he is a poor person unable to furnish the required sureties and that his arrest in an …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a notice‑cum‑order dated 19‑12‑2025 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Sikandrarao, Hathras, which was passed on a printed proforma under Section 107/16 of the BNSS/Cr.P.C. The …
Akash Saini filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf to press the application, although the learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted the absence of representation for the …
