Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
28 judgments · newest first · showing 1–28
The husband appealed a Family Court order that rejected his maintenance petition under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The High Court noted that the appellant had not filed the second copy of the brief with the memo of appeal, raising a procedural objection to the appeal's maintainability. The …
The Patna High Court considered two criminal appeals, one involving Kedar Rai and co‑accused and another by Rama Nand Sah, both against the State of Bihar. The court received reports and death certificates confirming that appellant Ram Shreshth Rai had died three years earlier and that appellant …
Sobha Devi, convicted in 2014 and whose conviction was affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge in 2025, filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the BNSS without having surrendered to the court. The State objected, noting the absence of a surrender certificate, and the petitioner …
The appellants, wife, son and daughter of the respondent, filed a Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 challenging an order dated 19‑06‑2025 passed under Section 127 of the Criminal Procedure Code that enhanced the maintenance amount. Relying on a Full Bench …
The appellants Bhola Rai and Kashi Nath Rai filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.735 of 2005 before the Patna High Court challenging a conviction dated 23.11.2005. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants, while the State's Additional Public Prosecutor was present. The court received a report from …
The Income Tax Department filed a miscellaneous appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an ITAT order dated 02.04.2025. The respondent argued that a recent circular dated 17.09.2024 limits High Court appeals to cases where the monetary value exceeds Rs.20,000,000, and the …
Hemant Kumar filed a criminal writ petition challenging condition No.4 of the bail order dated 25.07.2025, which required him to file a bail bond after the charge was framed. During the hearing on 30-03-2026, the petitioner, through his counsel, expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the …
The appellant, a husband, filed a Miscellaneous Application under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging an order dated 21‑06‑2025 that granted the respondent wife maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The appellant relied on a Full Bench decision (Dr. …
The appellants, a wife and her daughter, filed a Miscellaneous Application under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging an order dated 02‑05‑2025 that enhanced the maintenance amount granted under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Relying on a Full Bench decision in Dr. …
The husband (appellant) filed a Miscellaneous Application under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 challenging an order dated 19 January 2026 that had partly allowed his wife's application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The appellant later contended that the correct remedy was …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, a 17‑year‑old juvenile, was accused of participating in the gang rape of a 16‑year‑old girl. He applied for bail under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, which was rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board and upheld by the …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, a 17‑year‑old at the time of the alleged incident, was accused of participating in the gang‑rape of a 16‑year‑old girl. The Juvenile Justice Board denied his bail application under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, a decision …
Sanjoy Yadav filed a Miscellaneous Application under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 challenging an order dated 17‑10‑2024 that granted his mother relief under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The appellant relied on a Full Bench decision in Dr. Dilip Kumar Sharma v. State of …
The appellant, Nawal Shahi, filed Criminal Appeal No. 611 of 1998 against a conviction by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur. While the appeal was pending, the Assistant Registrar sought a living status report of the appellant. The Senior Superintendent of Police reported that the …
The husband (appellant) filed a miscellaneous application under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 challenging an order dated 16‑10‑2025 that granted the wife (respondent) relief under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Relying on a Full Bench decision in Dr. Dilip Kumar Sharma v. …
The informant Kanchan Devi alleged that her husband mortgaged her motorcycle to the appellants for Rs 5,000 and later demanded Rs 40,000, leading to an FIR under IPC sections 420, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act section 3(i)(r)(s). The appellants’ discharge application under CrPC section 227 was rejected, …
The appellant, Sunil Kumar Singh, sought additional time to comply with an earlier court order dated 04.02.2026. The learned counsel for the appellant prayed for a three‑week extension. The High Court, after hearing the counsel, granted the requested extension and directed that the matter be listed …
The petitioners, members of the Prajapati family, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNSS) Act, 2023 after a lower court rejected their earlier bail plea. The prosecution alleged that on 17 September 2025 the petitioners assaulted the informant’s wife, …
The petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar, a holder of a K‑License for minor minerals, was implicated in a case alleging that 10,000 MT of stone was added to his ID without his knowledge, leading to an FIR under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. He claimed he had promptly reported the discrepancy …
Rohit Kumar was arrested in connection with a theft case (PS case no.389 of 2025) alleging that he possessed a stolen motorcycle. The informant claimed the motorcycle recovered from Rohit had a different engine and chassis number than the one described in the FIR, suggesting a possible false …
The petitioner, Shami Anand, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS case no. 579 of 2025) and charged under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act. The informant, father of the deceased, alleged that the petitioner, along with unknown persons, …
The petitioner, Ashu Kumar, was charged under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the BNS, 2023 in connection with a missing‑person complaint filed by the victim’s father. The father alleged that his daughter was enticed away by the petitioner, but the victim later testified that she had voluntarily gone to a …
Petitioners Mohammad Ansari and Imam Ansari applied for bail in a case registered under IPC sections 363 read with 34, and later 201, 302, 120B, alleging kidnapping and murder. The FIR did not name them, and they argued false implication and lack of criminal history. The prosecution opposed bail but …
Sachin Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with PS Maharajganj case no. 519 of 2025 for alleged violations of Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, 1959, based on a police recovery of a pistol, cartridges and a phone. He filed a bail application claiming innocence, alleging that the …
Dharmendra Kumar was arrested in connection with a Kalyanpur police case (No.429 of 2024) and charged under Sections 127(1), 127(2), 115(2), 303(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the BNS. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and alleging that the FIR was lodged against unknown persons and that no …
Petitioner Raja Yadav was arrested on 26 April 2025 after police recovered a country-made pistol and live cartridges from him during a vehicle check, and he allegedly planned a loot of maize. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of independent witnesses, and non‑compliance with Section 105 …
Akash Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving illegal possession of a pistol and cartridges, and was charged under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He filed a bail application seeking enlargement of bail while the trial is pending, claiming innocence and alleging false …
The petitioners, three accused in a case registered under Sections 105 and 3(5) of the BNS for alleged involvement in a fatal assault, applied for bail. The prosecution alleged that the accused were caught at the scene of a robbery that led to a death, while the defence argued that the petitioners …
