Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SANJAY KUMAR

46 judgments · newest first · showing 1–46

M/S CARESTREAM HEALTH INDIA PVT. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

2026 INSC 837Dismissed

Carestream Health India imported laser imagers classified them under Customs Tariff Heading 9018 90 19, claiming they were diagnostic apparatus. The Customs authorities re‑classified the goods under residuary heading 9033 00 00, treating them as accessories usable with various medical machines. The …

A.K. GHOSH & COMPANY AND OTHERSversusBIMAN BOSE AND OTHERS

2026 INSC 684Dismissed

The plaintiffs, A.K. Ghosh & Co., filed a commercial suit for unpaid dues and the defendants filed a counter‑claim. The defendants served the counter‑claim on 18 July 2023, but the plaintiffs sought leave to file a written statement only on 15 March 2024, well beyond the statutory period. The …

PAPAN SARKAR @ PRANABversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2026 INSC 528Case Allowed

The appellant accused were convicted of pre‑meditated murder based on the "last seen together" theory, alleged extra‑judicial confessions, recoveries of alleged weapons and a motorcycle, and serological evidence. The Supreme Court examined whether the time gap between the accused being last seen …

ANGELWOODS APARTMENT ALLOTTEES ASSOCIATIONversusM LALITHA AND ANOTHER

2026 INSC 479Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Angelwoods Apartment Allottees Association, challenged the approval of its resolution plan by the NCLT, which was appealed by respondent M Lalitha, a financial creditor, under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Lalitha filed the appeal on the last permissible day but …

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusM/S B.B.M. ENTERPRISES

2026 INSC 358Appeal(s) allowed

The work under a contract was completed on 30 July 2000, but no final bill or measurement certificate was issued by the Engineer-in-Charge. The State of West Bengal filed a notice seeking arbitration on 2 June 2022, more than 21 years after completion, and the High Court ordered arbitration, holding …

SANJAY KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2026 INSC 223Dismissed

The case involved the alleged arson and murder of an elderly couple whose shanty was set ablaze, resulting in the death of the husband and later his wife. The prosecution alleged that the younger son and his wife committed the crime, relying primarily on several dying declarations, motive stemming …

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusBALJEET SINGH

2026 INSC 221Appeal(s) allowed

The CBI laid a trap after a complaint that Income Tax Inspector Baljeet Singh (A2) demanded a bribe of Rs 5 lakhs on behalf of Assessing Officer Arun Kumar Gurjar (A1). During the trap, marked notes smeared with phenolphthalein were recovered from A2's coat pocket and his hands turned pink in a …

PANNALAL BHANSALIversusBHARTI TELECOM LIMITED & ORS.

2026 INSC 213Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by minority shareholders of Bharti Telecom Limited (BTL) who challenged the company’s reduction of share capital under s.66 of the Companies Act, 2013, alleging that the valuation and the notice were unfair and misleading. BTL had cancelled 28.4 million shares …

RAKESH MITTALversusAJAY PAL GUPTA @ SONU CHAUDHARY AND ANOTHER

2026 INSC 161Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a complainant, filed an FIR alleging that the accused, Ajay Pal Gupta (also known as Sonu Chaudhary), conspired with others to cheat him of over ₹11.5 crore by supplying foodgrains and using forged documents. The accused was arrested after a 1.5‑year abscondment and his bail …

ROHIT JANGDEversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2026 INSC 162Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Rohit Jangde, the step‑father of a six‑year‑old girl, was convicted by the trial court and the High Court for her murder based on three circumstances: a ‘last seen together’ theory, recovery of charred bone fragments and ashes after the accused allegedly led police to the site, and …

REGINAMARY CHELLAMANIversusSTATE REP BY SUPERINTENDENT OF CUSTOMS

2026 INSC 127Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Reginamary Chellamani, was arrested for alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 22(c), 23, 28 and 29 of the NDPS Act read with Section 135 of the Customs Act, after a contraband substance exceeding the commercial quantity was seized from her. She had been in pre‑trial …

ARVIND DHAMversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2026 INSC 12Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former promoter and non‑executive chairman of Amtek Auto Ltd., was arrested in July 2024 on allegations of massive bank fraud and money‑laundering under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). Despite cooperating with the investigation and being the sole accused taken …

UV ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITEDversusELECTROSTEEL CASTINGS LIMITED

2026 INSC 14Dismissed

The appellant UV Asset Reconstruction Company claimed that Electrosteel Castings Ltd (ECL), as promoter of borrower Electrosteel Steels Ltd (ESL), had provided a guarantee for a Rs 500 crore loan from SREI, based on Clause 2.2 of a Deed of Undertaking which required ECL to arrange infusion of funds …

THE STATE (NCT) OF DELHIversusKHIMJI BHAI JADEJA

2026 INSC 25Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Delhi appealed against a Delhi High Court decision that held each deposit made by investors in a large cheating scheme constituted a separate transaction and that separate FIRs and charge sheets were required. The scheme, alleged to involve 1,852 victims defrauded of ₹46.40 crore, was …

S. NAGESHversusSHOBHA S. ARADHYA

2026 INSC 27Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act alleging dishonour of a cheque, but the complaint was filed two days after the statutory one‑month period. The magistrate took cognizance of the complaint on the same day it was filed, before any application for …

DIVJOT SEKHONversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

2026 INSC 26Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners challenged the Punjab government's alteration of the sports‑quota admission criteria for MBBS/BDS courses, which expanded the "zone of consideration" from Classes XI‑XII to include Classes IX‑X after applications had been filed. They argued that the mid‑stream change was arbitrary, …

MOHAN LAL FATEHPURIAversusM/S BHARAT TEXTILES & ORS.

2025 INSC 1409Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, a husband and wife, entered into a partnership deed containing an arbitration clause and later appointed a sole arbitrator, Mr. Anjum Javed, to resolve disputes with the respondents. The arbitrator repeatedly demanded administrative expenses, which the respondents challenged under …

M/S SHANTI CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.versusTHE STATE OF ODISHA & ORS.

2025 INSC 1295Disposed off

The State of Odisha issued an auction notice for a five‑year sand‑quarry lease; Shanti Construction Pvt. Ltd., the highest‑price bidder, was declared non‑responsive for not submitting an Income Tax Return for FY 2021‑22, while a lower‑priced bidder was declared successful. The dispute centered on …

MMTC LIMITEDversusANGLO AMERICAN METALLURGICAL COAL PVT. LIMITED

2025 INSC 1279Dismissed

MMTC Limited entered a Long Term Agreement with Anglo American Metallurgical Coal for the supply of coking coal, but a dispute arose over the price and unlifted quantities, leading to an arbitral award in favour of Anglo. MMTC challenged the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation …

VINISHMA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR.

2025 INSC 1182Appeal(s) allowed

Vinishma Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a company with experience supplying sports kits in several Indian states, challenged a tender issued by the State of Chhattisgarh for supplying sports kits to government schools because the tender required bidders to have supplied goods worth at least Rs.6 crore to …

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusCORPORATION BANK & ORS.

2025 INSC 1161Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) had allotted a plot to Sarita Vihar Club under a lease that gave DDA a pre‑emptive right to purchase and required Lieutenant Governor’s consent for any mortgage. The Club mortgaged the plot to Corporation Bank without such consent, defaulted on the loan and the …

GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITEDversusESSAR POWER LIMITED AND ANOTHER

2025 INSC 1160Disposed off

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd (GUVNL), successor to Gujarat Electricity Board, entered into a power purchase agreement (PPA) with Essar Power Ltd (EPL) for 300 MW of a 515 MW plant, while EPL had a separate PPA with its sister company Essar Steel Ltd (ESL) for the remaining 215 MW. EPL repeatedly …

MOHAMMAD AFZAL MOHAMMAD SHARIFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 1100Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a 17‑year‑old who was assaulted during communal riots in Akola on 13 May 2023, claimed that the police failed to register a First Information Report (FIR) despite his written complaint and hospital statement. He alleged that the assailants also murdered a man mistakenly identified as …

DEEP NURSING HOME AND ANOTHERversusMANMEET SINGH MATTEWAL AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 1094Appeal(s) allowed

Manmeet Singh Mattewal lost his wife and newborn child during delivery at Deep Nursing Home. He alleged medical negligence by Dr. Kanwarjit Kochhar and the nursing home, leading to compensation orders by the State and National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions. The Supreme Court examined …

AMIT NEHRA & ANR.versusPAWAN KUMAR GARG & ORS.

2025 INSC 1086Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, homebuyers who paid Rs.57,56,684 for an apartment in the IREO Rise project, sought possession after the developer defaulted on delivery. Their claim was filed initially on 11‑01‑2019 and resubmitted on 07‑02‑2020, after which the Resolution Professional verified it and included it in …

SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARIversusHARE RAM SAH & ORS.

2025 INSC 1061Disposed off

The case involved a minor girl who became pregnant after being allegedly raped separately by two accused, Hare Ram Sah and Manish Tiwari, in 2016. The trial court convicted them under IPC s.376(2) and POCSO §§4,6, imposing rigorous life imprisonment, but the High Court acquitted them, holding that …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusR. SHANKARAPPA

2025 INSC 898Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a former Sub‑Divisional Engineer in the Department of Telecommunication, was convicted in two criminal cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act and faced parallel disciplinary proceedings for a trap case and for possessing assets disproportionate to his known income. Two …

RIKHAB BIRANI & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2025 INSC 512Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Rikhab Birani and Sadhna Birani, entered into an oral agreement to sell a godown for Rs 1.35 crore, which the buyer, Shilpi Gupta, failed to fully pay, leading the sellers to re‑sell the property at a lower price. The buyer subsequently approached the Metropolitan Magistrate to …

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusRAM KISHORI GUPTA & ANR.

2025 INSC 454Disposed off

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued show‑cause notices to Vital Communications Ltd (VCL) and related entities for misleading advertisements, leading to a series of orders: a 2008 restraint order, a 2014 order imposing market bans, and a 2018 disgorgement order. The Securities …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusN.M. RAUT & ORS.

2024 INSC 1042Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS), 2008, particularly how financial upgradations granted under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 should be counted for MACPS eligibility. Respondents, employed as Pharmacists and …

DR BALRAM SINGH AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 893Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the 1976 insertion of the words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ into the Preamble of the Constitution, arguing that the amendment was retrospective, lacked popular consent, and violated the basic structure by restricting economic policy and religious freedom. The Court examined …

YOGARANIversusSTATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2024 INSC 721Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant (accused No.2) was convicted under IPC s.420 and the Passports Act for allegedly facilitating the illegal issuance of a second passport to accused No.1, who already possessed a passport. The prosecution relied on the testimony of three witnesses, including a hostile employee and a …

SUSHIL KUMAR PANDEY & ORS.versusHIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND & ANR.

2024 INSC 97Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the selection process for District Judge posts in Jharkhand where the High Court, via a Full Court resolution, introduced a 50% aggregate marks requirement after candidates' performances were already assessed. Petitioners challenged this alteration, arguing it violated the …

SACHIN GARGversusSTATE OF U.P & ANR.

2024 INSC 72Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior manager of Exide Industries Ltd., was summoned by a magistrate to stand trial under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged criminal breach of trust and intimidation arising from a commercial dispute over the price of dissolved acetylene gas supplied by …

STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERSversusBINOD KUMAR AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 44Dismissed

The State of Assam and its officials challenged the validity of Rule 63(iii) of the Assam Police Manual, which designates the Deputy Commissioner as the reporting authority for Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) and Annual Performance Appraisal Reports (APARs) of District Superintendents of Police …

RAJPALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2023 INSC 1089Dismissed as withdrawn

The petitioner, Rajpal, challenged the denial of his bail application, arguing that his co‑accused had been granted bail by a coordinate bench of the Rajasthan High Court for the same FIR. The Supreme Court noted that despite its earlier directives, High Courts continue to list bail applications …

ABHISHEK SAXENAversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR

2023 INSC 1088Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Abhishek Saxena, was charged under IPC sections 323, 384 and 406 for alleged assault, extortion and criminal breach of trust arising from a FIR filed on 4 September 2016. He had earlier filed a petition for dissolution of marriage and a guardianship application under the Guardians & …

MAKKELLA NAGAIAHversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2023 INSC 800Appeal(s) allowed

Makkella Nagaiah was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for a murder committed on 21‑12‑2005 and sentenced to life imprisonment. He later filed a writ petition under Article 32 claiming that he was a juvenile at the time of the offence, asserting a date of birth of …

M/S. JERMYN CAPITAL LLC DUBAIversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.

2023 INSC 547Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained an application by M/s. Jerlyn Capital LLC Dubai seeking modification of its earlier order dated 09‑05‑2023, which had set aside a requirement to furnish a bank guarantee and allowed the appellant to withdraw Rs.38.52 crore with 4% simple interest from 08‑05‑2006. The …

C.S. GOPALAKRISHNAN ETC.versusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & OTHERS

2023 INSC 510Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined challenges to the Tamil Nadu Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 and the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001, alleging inherent arbitrariness and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. The appellants, who purchased the lands after acquisition notices were issued, sought to …