Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SANJIV KHANNA

106 judgments · newest first · showing 1–106

C.T. KOCHOUSEPHversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER ETC.

2025 INSC 661Dismissed

The appellants purchased goods from dealers who were exempt from sales tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and challenged the levy of purchase tax under s.5A of the Kerala Act and s.7A of the Tamil Nadu Act. The questions were whether such …

GAYATRI BALASAMYversusM/S ISG NOVASOFT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

2025 INSC 605Disposed off

The Supreme Court was asked to resolve a long‑standing controversy over whether courts exercising jurisdiction under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can modify an arbitral award. The issue arose from the earlier decision in Project Director, NHAI v. M. Hakeem, where …

RIKHAB BIRANI & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2025 INSC 512Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Rikhab Birani and Sadhna Birani, entered into an oral agreement to sell a godown for Rs 1.35 crore, which the buyer, Shilpi Gupta, failed to fully pay, leading the sellers to re‑sell the property at a lower price. The buyer subsequently approached the Metropolitan Magistrate to …

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusBAISHAKHI BHATTACHARYYA (CHATTERJEE) AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 437Disposed off

The West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) conducted a 2016 recruitment for assistant teachers and non‑teaching staff that was later found to involve massive irregularities, including rank‑jumping, out‑of‑panel appointments, manipulation of OMR scores, destruction of original answer sheets …

MADHYA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONversusVINCENT DANIEL AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 408Dismissed

The Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation sought to acquire land for a highway project and determined compensation using the circle rate fixed under the Indian Stamp Act, as prescribed by the Collector’s Guidelines. The landowners challenged the award, arguing that the compensation was …

DISORTHO S.A.S.versusMERIL LIFE SCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED

2025 INSC 352Case Allowed

Disortho S.A.S., a Colombian company, and Meril Life Sciences, an Indian company, entered an International Exclusive Distributor Agreement for medical products in Colombia. Clause 16.5 of the agreement states that Indian law governs the contract and Gujarat courts have jurisdiction, while Clause 18 …

RADHIKA AGARWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 272

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of the amendments to the Customs Act, 1962 and the arrest provisions in the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, arguing that offences under these statutes remain non‑cognizable and that authorized officers must obtain a magistrate's …

M/S ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 215Appeal(s) allowed

M/s ABCI Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. submitted a financial bid of Rs 1,569 crores for a tunnel project but due to a typographical error the bid appeared as Rs 1,569 only. The appellant discovered the mistake on 24‑08‑2023, promptly informed BRO and sought to withdraw or rectify the bid, but BRO …

AYYUB & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2025 INSC 168Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a suspected romantic relationship between Ziaul Rahman and his cousin Tanu. After Ziaul’s death in a physical assault, Tanu allegedly committed suicide, and the complainant Vijay (R‑2) filed an FIR accusing the appellants of abetting her suicide under Section 306 IPC. The High …

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHERversusR.K. PANDEY AND ANOTHER

2025 INSC 48Appeal(s) allowed

R.K. Pandey, a former lab assistant of a state‑run medical college, claimed that his superannuation age should be 60 years and sought relief through arbitration, relying on an alleged 1957 arbitration agreement between the municipal board and the Governor of Uttar Pradesh. He unilaterally appointed …

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, SALEMversusM/S MADHAN AGRO INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LTD.

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 893Dismissed

The case concerned whether pure coconut oil sold in small retail packs (5 ml‑2 L) should be classified as ‘edible oil’ under Heading 1513 of Chapter 15 or as ‘hair oil’ under Heading 3305 of Chapter 33 in the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The respondents marketed the oil as …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusN.M. RAUT & ORS.

2024 INSC 1042Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS), 2008, particularly how financial upgradations granted under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 should be counted for MACPS eligibility. Respondents, employed as Pharmacists and …

TARUN DHAMEJAversusSUNIL DHAMEJA & ANR.

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 987Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, as legal representative of a deceased partner, invoked an arbitration clause in a partnership deed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, after the High Court dismissed his petition. The central issue was whether the clause was merely optional or required …

OACHIRA PARABRAHMA TEMPLE & ANR.versusG. VIJAYANATHAKURUP AND ORS.

2024 INSC 922

The appellants, elected Secretary and President of the Executive Committee of Oachira Parabrahma Temple, challenged two High Court orders that removed the elected committee and appointed an unelected committee under an Administrative Head. They argued that the High Court, having disposed of the …

THE STATE OF KARNATAKAversusCHANDRASHA

2024 INSC 928Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka appealed against the Karnataka High Court’s order acquitting a government servant, Chandrasha, who was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs 2,000 to facilitate the encashment …

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERSversusDR. RAO, V.B.J. CHELIKANI AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 894Disposed off

The case concerned several Government Orders (GoMs) issued by the Andhra Pradesh (now Telangana) government that allotted public land at basic rates to a select class of persons – MPs, MLAs, All India Services officers, judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts, and journalists – through …

DR BALRAM SINGH AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 893Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the 1976 insertion of the words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ into the Preamble of the Constitution, arguing that the amendment was retrospective, lacked popular consent, and violated the basic structure by restricting economic policy and religious freedom. The Court examined …

RAMA DEVIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 755Case Partly allowed

The case concerns the murder of MLA Brij Bihari Prasad and his bodyguard Lakshmeshwar Sahu at IGIMS Hospital in 1998. The trial court convicted several accused, but the Patna High Court acquitted all, prompting appeals by the State (through the CBI) and the victim's wife, Rama Devi. The Supreme …

SANTOSH @ RAJESH @ GOPALversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2024 INSC 723Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Santosh @ Rajesh @ Gopal, was convicted for the murder of Narayan Singh based on the recovery of a pistol from his possession and a ballistic report linking the weapon to the fatal bullet. The prosecution’s case relied on a disclosure statement made by a co-accused, which led to the …

ROHAN BUILDERS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITEDversusBERGER PAINTS INDIA LIMITED

2024 INSC 686Directions issued

Rohan Builders sought an extension of time under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the statutory twelve‑month period (or the six‑month consent‑based extension) for making an arbitral award had expired. The Calcutta High Court had held that such an application was not …

CHALASANI UDAYA SHANKAR AND OTHERSversusM/S. LEXUS TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 671Case Allowed

The appellants, who claimed to have purchased 94.8% of the equity shares of M/s. Lexus Technologies Pvt. Ltd., filed a company petition before the NCLT seeking rectification of the Register of Members under Sections 59 and 88 of the Companies Act, 2013 and relief for oppression, mismanagement and …

S. TIRUPATHI RAOversusM. LINGAMAIAH & ORS.

2024 INSC 544Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose from a civil suit concerning the partition of ancestral land, which led to a decree directing the Tahsildar to mutate the name of the first respondent in revenue records. The Tahsildar failed to comply, prompting a contempt petition that was initially allowed by a Single Judge but …

ARVIND KEJRIWALversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2024 INSC 512Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court examined the arrest of Arvind Kejriwal under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, in connection with the Delhi excise policy case alleging kickbacks and money‑laundering. Kejriwal challenged the arrest as illegal, arguing that the "reasons to believe" did not …

ARVIND KEJRIWALversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2024 INSC 400

Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, was arrested on 21 March 2024 by the Directorate of Enforcement in connection with alleged offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and related statutes. He challenged the arrest before the Supreme Court, arguing that the legality of his …

SHARIF AHMED AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 363Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined three criminal appeals arising from chargesheets filed in Uttar Pradesh that were alleged to lack sufficient factual detail and evidence under Section 173(2) of the CrPC. It considered whether a chargesheet must contain detailed facts and material evidence to enable a …

ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMSversusELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 341Disposed off

The Association for Democratic Reforms challenged the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) with VVPAT, seeking a return to paper ballots, physical hand‑over of VVPAT slips to voters, and 100% VVPAT counting, alleging possible manipulation. The Supreme Court examined the technical architecture of …

LEONARD XAVIER VALDARISversusJITENDRA RAMNAYARAN RATHOD & ORS.

2024 INSC 344Disposed off

In the Bombay High Court, two single judges issued contradictory orders on the same set of facts concerning the framing of a charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The first judge upheld the charge, while the second judge directed that the charge should not be framed, creating a …

ARCADIA SHIPPING LTD.versusTATA STEEL LIMITED AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 333Dismissed

Bhushan Steel (now Tata Steel) filed a suit in the Delhi High Court against several parties, including Arcadia Shipping, alleging non‑payment under a Letter of Credit for galvanized steel shipped from Mumbai to Djibouti. The plaintiff claimed that the cause of action arose in Delhi because the …

DR. JAYA THAKUR & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2024 INSC 246

The petitioners challenged the constitutionality of Section 7(1) of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023, which replaces the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the Selection Committee …

SATYANAND SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 236Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Havaldar in the Indian Army, was discharged in 2001 after being diagnosed with AIDS based on a medical report that linked his HIV-positive status with neuro‑tuberculosis. He challenged the discharge, arguing that the diagnosis was erroneous, his CD4 count remained above the …

ASSOCIATION OF DEMOCRATIC REFORMS & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 226Disposed off

The Supreme Court earlier ordered the State Bank of India (SBI) to disclose details of electoral bonds purchased and the contributions received by political parties. A Miscellaneous Application was filed seeking to pre‑date the point from which such disclosure must be made. The Court examined the …

ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 209Disposed off

The Election Commission of India (ECI) had earlier submitted data on electoral bonds to the Supreme Court, which was kept in sealed custody as per an interim order dated 12 April 2019. The Court later directed the ECI to upload this data on its website, assuming the ECI retained a copy. The ECI …

SAMAJ PARIVARTANA SAMUDAYA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2024 INSC 267Directions issued

The Supreme Court heard applications arising from the long‑standing illegal mining controversy in Bellary, Chitradurga and Tumkur districts of Karnataka. The petitioners sought directions for demarcating seven mining leases that straddle the Karnataka‑Andhra Pradesh boundary, for the implementation …

STATE BANK OF INDIAversusASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 195

The Supreme Court had earlier declared the Electoral Bond Scheme unconstitutional and directed the State Bank of India (SBI), as the authorized bank, to furnish the Election Commission of India (ECI) with details of each bond purchased and redeemed between 12 April 2019 and 15 February 2024. SBI …

DECCAN VALUE INVESTORS L.P. & ANR.versusDINKAR VENKATASUBRAMANIAN & ANR.

2024 INSC 321Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code filed by the successful resolution applicants, Deccan Value Investors L.P. and DVI PE (Mauritius) Ltd., who sought to withdraw their approved resolution plan for Metalyst Forgings Ltd., alleging fraud by the …

ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 113

The Supreme Court of India struck down the Electoral Bond Scheme and related amendments to the Finance Act 2017, which had introduced anonymous financial contributions to political parties. The Court held that the scheme violated the right to information of voters under Article 19(1)(a) of the …

DBS BANK LIMITED SINGAPOREversusRUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 14Matter referred to larger bench

DBS Bank Limited Singapore extended a USD 50 million loan to Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, secured by first charges over immovable assets. A resolution plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors with 96.95% support, but DBS dissented, receiving a pro‑rata distribution that was lower than the …

BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusVIJAYKUMAR V. IYER AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 15Dismissed

Bharti Airtel Ltd. and Bharti Hexacom Ltd. entered into spectrum trading agreements with Aircel Ltd. and Dishnet Wireless Ltd., which later led to disputes over bank guarantees and payments. When Aircel entered the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), Airtel claimed a right to set‑off Rs. …

PERUMAL RAJA @ PERUMALversusSTATE, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2024 INSC 13Dismissed

The appellant, Perumal Raja, was detained during an investigation into a separate murder and gave a disclosure statement that led police to recover the body parts of his cousin, Rajini, and other stolen items. The key issue was whether the appellant was "in custody" for the purposes of Section 27 of …

MANISH SISODIAversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2023 INSC 956Dismissed

Manish Sisodia, former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi, appealed to the Supreme Court seeking bail in prosecutions under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the Indian Penal Code and an enforcement case under the Prevention of Money‑Laundering Act, 2002. The Court examined the scope of bail under …

A. VALLIAMMAIversusK.P. MURALI AND OTHERS

2023 INSC 823Disposed off

A. Valliammai entered into an agreement to sell land to K. Sriram in 1988, with an advance paid and the balance due by May 1989, later extended to November 1989. After disputes and notices in 1991 indicating Valliammai's refusal to perform, Sriram filed an injunction suit, which was later dismissed, …

SMT. ROOPA SONIversusKAMALNARAYAN SONI

2023 INSC 814Appeal(s) allowed

The marriage between Roopa Soni and Kamalnarayan Soni, solemnised in 2002, broke down after the birth of their child, leading to a separation that has lasted for over fifteen years. Both parties filed serious allegations against each other, including a complaint under Section 498A IPC and the Dowry …

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA (THROUGH STRESSED ASSETS STABILIZATION FUND CONSTITUTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA)versusSUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS AND OTHERS

2023 INSC 746Appeal(s) allowed

The Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI), as a secured creditor, sought to enforce its charge over imported machinery that had been stored in a private bonded warehouse and remained unpaid of customs duty. The company was wound up on 1 December 2003, and the Official Liquidator applied for …

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusASHARAM @ ASHUMAL

2023 INSC 383Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan appealed against a High Court order that allowed the respondent, Asharam, to summon Deputy Commissioner of Police Ajay Pal Lamba under Section 391 of the CrPC, based on a claim in his book that he had recorded a video of the crime scene a day before site maps were prepared. …

M/S SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD. & ORS.versusNAVEEN MATHEW PHILIP & ANR. ETC. ETC.

2023 INSC 379Disposed off

The appellants, South Indian Bank Ltd. and others, appealed against the Kerala High Court’s orders allowing borrowers to defer loan repayment under the SARFAESI Act. The borrowers had filed writ petitions under Article 226 challenging notices issued under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI …

SURESHKUMAR LALITKUMAR PATEL & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2023 INSC 145Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the recruitment of Supervisor Instructor posts in Gujarat where the Departmental Selection Committee, after publishing results, reduced the cut‑off marks to accommodate candidates under horizontal reservations (women, ex‑servicemen, physically challenged) by treating them as …

ANNA MATHEWS AND OTHERSversusSUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2023 INSC 122Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the appointment of an individual as an Additional Judge of the Madras High Court, alleging that the collegium had not properly considered the candidate's suitability and seeking a writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash the recommendation and compel reconsideration. The …

M/S. MUTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCE LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2023 INSC 5Appeal(s) allowed

Muthoot Leasing and Finance Ltd and another, classified as credit institutions, challenged the levy of interest tax on the interest component embedded in hire‑purchase instalments under the Interest‑Tax Act, 1974. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that hire‑purchase agreements are …

NEPA LIMITED THROUGH ITS SENIOR MANAGER (LEGAL)versusMANOJ KUMAR AGRAWAL

2022 INSC 1263Appeal(s) allowed

The arbitral award dated 14‑04‑2000 directed Nepa Ltd to pay Rs 14,49,300 to Manoj Kumar Agrawal with 18% interest from the award date. The High Court, on a stay order, required Nepa to deposit 50% of the amount (Rs 7,78,280) which the respondent withdrew on 08‑11‑2001 after giving a personal …

THE STATE OF RAJASTHANversusGURBACHAN SINGH & OTHERS

2022 INSC 1260Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan appealed the conviction of Gurbachan Singh for murder arising out of a land‑dispute in which Teja Singh was killed. The High Court had acquitted Singh of the murder charge, holding that he only struck the victim's feet with a lathi and therefore lacked common intention to …

PARIVAR SEVA SANSTHAversusAHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

2022 INSC 1224Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered appeals by Parivar Seva Sanstha and Bai Gulab Hargovandas Trust seeking exemption from municipal property tax on the ground that their hospitals and clinics are run by charitable trusts. The issue was whether clause (b) of Section 132 of the Gujarat Provincial Municipal …

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-IIversusM/S BPL LIMITED

2022 INSC 1077Dismissed

The Deputy Commissioner of Gift Tax appealed against the valuation of shares gifted by M/s BPL Limited to M/s Celestial Finance Ltd. The shares, although listed, were promoter quota shares subject to a lock‑in period, raising the question of whether they were "quoted" for valuation purposes. The …

MEENA DEVIversusNUNU CHAND MAHTO @ NEMCHAND MAHTO & ORS

2022 INSC 1080Appeal(s) allowed

A 12‑year‑old boy died when a jeep struck him while he was playing outside his house. The mother filed a claim petition under Sections 140, 166 and 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act seeking Rs 2,00,000 compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 1,50,000 and the High Court enhanced it …

P. DAIVASIGAMANIversusS. SAMBANDAN

2022 INSC 1070Dismissed

The appellant, who owned a one‑acre wetland, entered into a 1989 agreement to sell the land to the respondent for Rs 6,50,000, with a six‑month completion clause. The respondent repeatedly notified the appellant to perform, demonstrated his readiness and willingness, and filed a suit for specific …

INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS’ FEDERATION OF INDIA (REGD.)versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2022 INSC 879Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2009, which amended the definition of “employee” in the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and inserted Section 13A with retrospective effect from 3 April 1997 to extend gratuity benefits to teachers in …

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusEX. HC/GD VIRENDER SINGH

2022 INSC 850Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme for Central Armed Police Forces should be applied from 1 January 2006 or from 1 September 2008, and what financial up‑gradation entitlement it confers. It held that the MACP Scheme became operative on 1 …

DAUVARAM NIRMALKARversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2022 INSC 786Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Dauvaram Nirmalkar, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for killing his brother Dashrath Nirmalkar. The trial court and High Court found him the sole perpetrator based on eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence, and his own confession, which was held inadmissible under …

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusSUNIL KRISHNA KHAITAN AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 669Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined two appeals filed by SEBI against Sunil Krishna Khaitan and others and Madhuri S. Pitti, challenging SEBI's show‑cause notices and directions under the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997. The Court clarified that the term “acquirer” in …

SOM DUTT & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2022 INSC 385Case Partly allowed

The appellants, Som Dutt and others, were convicted by three successive courts for theft under Section 379 read with Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced to three months' simple imprisonment and a fine. They challenged the High Court's dismissal of their revision petition, seeking release on …

SARANPAL KAUR ANANDversusPRADUMAN SINGH CHANDHOK AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 347Directions issued

Saranpal Kaur Anand filed a suit in 2012 seeking a declaration that a 1969 sale deed and a 1995 deed were void, and an injunction against the defendants. The defendants moved to reject the plaint on the ground of limitation under Order VII Rule 11(d). The Delhi High Court Single Judge framed a …

DESH DEEPAK KUMAR VIHANGAM@ DEEPAK KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

2022 INSC 278Dismissed

The case concerned the kidnapping for ransom of Dr. Shashi Kumar Sinha and his driver in February 2006. Six persons were convicted under IPC sections 364A (kidnapping for ransom) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Supreme Court examined whether the prosecution had …

KRISHNAMURTHY @ GUNODU AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2022 INSC 190Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Venkatarama, where Krishnamurthy, Gopala and Thimmappa were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. Evidence showed Krishnamurthy brutally assaulted the victim after he fell, causing fatal injuries, establishing his liability for murder. The …

SATYE SINGH & ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2022 INSC 185Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Shashi Devi, a married woman, was found burnt in the hut of her husband Satye Singh; her father filed a complaint implicating the husband, his mother and sister‑in‑law. The Sessions Court convicted the husband and his mother under Sections 302, 34 and 201 of the IPC based solely on …

JAINA CONSTRUCTION COMPANYversusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR.

2022 INSC 177Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Jaina Construction Company insured a Tata Aiwa truck with Oriental Insurance Company, which was stolen on 04‑11‑2007. The appellant lodged an FIR the next day, but informed the insurer of the theft only after five months, prompting the insurer to repudiate the claim on the ground of …

PRADEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusPOST MASTER GENERAL AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 156Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants purchased Kisan Vikas Patras (KVPs) in joint names and, relying on an agent named Rukhsana, handed the certificates to her for transfer. Rukhsana encashed the KVPs at a different post office and received Rs. 25,54,000 in cash, which she kept. The appellants filed a consumer complaint; …

SUNIL KUMAR MAITYversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR.

2022 INSC 84Appeal(s) allowed

Sunil Kumar Maity deposited a cheque that was mistakenly credited to another customer with a similar name at State Bank of India. He filed a complaint before the Consumer Forum, which was allowed; the bank appealed to the State Consumer Commission, which partially upheld the order. The bank then …

SAFIQ AHMADversusICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & OTHERS

2021 INSC 910Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the widespread filing of fraudulent compensation claims under the Motor Vehicles Act and the Workmen's Compensation Act, as investigated by a Special Investigating Team (SIT) in Uttar Pradesh. The SIT reported 1,376 suspicious claims, of which 247 had been examined, …

SALUJA CONSTRUCTION COMPANYversusNORTHERN COALFIELDS LIMITED

2021 INSC 788Case Partly allowed

Saluja Construction Company entered into a contract with Northern Coalfields Limited for the Bina Project and invoked arbitration under Clause 9, filing an application under Sections 8 and 20 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 limited to that project. The arbitrator, however, issued an …

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERSversusPAWAN KUMAR AND OTHERS ETC.

2021 INSC 713Directions issued

The State of Bihar appealed against a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order that barred sand mining in Banka district until a District Survey Report (DSR) received approval from the State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) and the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA). The Supreme Court …

INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANOTHERversusSUNITA

2021 INSC 704Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Life Insurance Corporation of India issued a life insurance policy with an additional accident benefit. The policy lapsed on 14 October 2011 due to non‑payment of premium. The insured suffered a fatal accident on 6 March 2012, and the premium was paid on 9 March 2012 to revive the …

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusAGRICAS LLP AND OTHERS ETC.

2020 INSC 508Disposed off

The Union of India amended the import policy for peas and other pulses, shifting them from a free to a restricted category and imposing quantitative import limits through notifications and a trade notice issued under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (FTDR Act). Importers …

G H KANWAR PAL SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

2019 INSC 1406Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a director of a mining company, was granted a lease to excavate sand in specific plots in Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, but was alleged to have mined sand outside the permitted area, leading to registration of an FIR under Section 379 IPC, the Mines and Minerals (Development and …

RAJ KUMARI AND OTHERSversusSURINDER PAL SHARMA

2019 INSC 1388Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Raj Kumari filed a partition suit claiming a one‑fourth share in a tenement allotted to her mother Suhagwanti. The respondent Surinder Pal Sharma defended the suit by producing a registered Will dated 02‑01‑1992, allegedly executed by Suhagwanti in his favour and attested by Ramesh …

G H UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusWING COMMANDER S.P. RATHORE

2019 INSC 1359Appeal(s) allowed

Wing Commander S.P. Rathore, an Air Force officer, retired on superannuation with a disability assessed at less than 20% and applied for a disability pension. The Armed Forces Tribunal granted the pension by applying the rounding‑off provisions of Para 7.2 of the Ministry of Defence circular. The …

KUNJAN SADANA & ANR.versusMAHESH KUMAR & ORS

2019 INSC 1348Appeal(s) allowed

The claimants, the mother and minor brother of 19‑year‑old Yitesh Sadana, sought compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act after his death in a bus accident caused by driver negligence. The Tribunal and the Delhi High Court awarded loss of dependency using a multiplier of 15, based on the mother’s …

HARBHAJAN SINGH ETCversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 1315Dismissed

The appellants, tenants of shops in a Gurudwara, challenged the Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997 on the ground that it withdrew the protection afforded to them under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restrictions Act, 1949 and violated Article 14. The Supreme Court …

VINOD KUMAR GARGversusSTATE (GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI)

2019 INSC 1287Dismissed

Inspector Vinod Kumar Garg was convicted for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.500 from Nand Lal in exchange for facilitating an electricity connection to a shed, with the money recovered from his pant pocket during a police trap. The appellant appealed, alleging material contradictions in the …

G H CENTURY RAYON LIMITEDversusIVP LIMITED AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 1288Appeal(s) allowed

Century Rayon Ltd (appellant) sought to erect 100 kV electricity transmission towers on land owned by IVP Ltd (first respondent) under a sanction from MSEDC. IVP Ltd filed a suit for permanent injunction alleging the contractors were excavating its land without permission. The trial court and High …

SHIV SENA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2019 INSC 1286Directions issued

The petitioners (Shiv Sena, NCP and INC) challenged the Governor of Maharashtra’s decision to invite the BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis to form the government after President's Rule was revoked on 23 November 2019. They argued that the Governor’s action violated constitutional principles, including …

VINAY PRAKASH SINGHversusSAMEER GEHLAUT & ORS.

2019 INSC 1251Directions issued

The petitioner sought enforcement of a Singapore arbitral award of about Rs.3,500 crore against respondents who owned Fortis Healthcare. The Supreme Court had earlier ordered a status‑quo on 11 August 2017, clarified on 31 August 2017 and modified on 15 February 2018, prohibiting any change in the …

RAM KRISHAN GROVER AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 1239Dismissed

The petitioners, tenants in Chandigarh and Punjab, challenged Section 13‑B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which gives Non‑Resident Indian (NRI) landlords a preferential right to evict tenants, and the extension of this provision to the Union Territory of Chandigarh by a 2009 …

HARI NIWAS GUPTAversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER

2019 INSC 1227Dismissed

Three Bihar judicial officers were dismissed by a Full Court resolution that invoked clause (b) of the second proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitution, dispensing with a departmental inquiry. The High Court had failed to record written reasons for dispensing with the inquiry, leading the …

M/S ORIENTAL KURIES LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN P. D. JOSEversusLISSA & ORS.

2019 INSC 1211Amount Awarded

The appeal concerned a chit fund operated by Oriental Kuries Ltd., where the respondents defaulted on twelve instalments. The lower courts had allowed recovery of the past instalments but barred recovery of future instalments, holding that a chitty agreement creates only a promise to pay, not a …

JYOTHIR RversusSUNISHA N.S. & ORS.

2019 INSC 1009Disposed off

The case concerned admission to the MBBS programme in Kerala under the sports quota. The appellant, a candidate who had applied under the individual sports category, sought a writ directing the Sports Council to shift another candidate from the individual to the team list, which would have raised …

MANOHARANversusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARIETY HALL POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE

2019 INSC 851Disposed off

Manoharan was convicted for kidnapping, gang‑rape of a 10‑year‑old girl and the murder of the girl and her 7‑year‑old brother, who were thrown into a canal after a failed poisoning attempt. The prosecution proved the offences beyond reasonable doubt through extensive witness testimony, forensic DNA …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERSversusLAFARGE DEALERS ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 734Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether sales‑tax exemption/deferment granted to cement manufacturers under the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994, would continue to apply after the bifurcation of the erstwhile State of Madhya Pradesh into the reorganised State of Madhya Pradesh and the new State of …

THE STATE OF RAJASTHANversusNEMI CHAND MAHELA AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 588Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a long‑running dispute concerning the award of domicile‑based bonus marks in appointments of primary school teachers in Rajasthan. Earlier judgments (Kailash Chand Sharma and Manmohan Sharma) had declared such bonus marks unconstitutional and applied the doctrine of …

ADJUDICATING OFFICER, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusBHAVESH PABARI

2019 INSC 289Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the scope of Sections 15‑J and 15‑A to 15‑HA of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 in a series of appeals arising from penalties imposed on Bhavesh Pabari, Shree Radhe and other respondents for violations of SEBI regulations. The principal issue was …