Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
88 judgments · newest first · showing 1–88
Raman Kumar filed a criminal revision (No. 5989 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of Uttar Pradesh. At the admission stage, counsel for the revisionist, Shweta Nishad, informed the court that the revisionist no longer wished to pursue the matter and sought …
Ram Pratap Patel and another filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court. At the admission stage, counsel for the revisionists informed the court that they wished to withdraw the revision. The State’s Advocate General raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, having received …
Veer Singh was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, sentenced to six months' simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10 lakh, with Rs.9 lakh directed as compensation under Section 357(1) of the Cr.P.C. Both parties later entered …
Arjun Singh filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 08.07.2026 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, which dismissed his application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS on the premise that he was not interested in pursuing it. The revisionist contended that the magistrate’s …
The Sessions Judge rejected the revisionists' application for discharge and proceeded to frame a charge under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code in a case involving assault with lathi, danda and axe that caused serious injuries. The revisionists contended that the investigating officer, after …
The revisionists challenged the Sessions Judge’s orders rejecting their discharge application and framing charges of attempt to commit culpable homicide (Sec. 110 BNS) and related offences. They argued that the injuries were simple, not grievous, and that a separate FIR lodged by a victim undermined …
Durgesh Kaushik filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) challenging a Judicial Magistrate's order that rejected his Section 173(4) BNSS application on the ground that no offence was disclosed. The revisionist alleged that fraud had been …
The revisionists challenged two orders of the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate who, on the basis of police and revenue reports indicating a dispute and apprehension of breach of peace, attached agricultural land and refused to drop proceedings under Section 145 CrPC. The revisionists argued that a civil …
The High Court examined a criminal revision filed by Heera Lal and others challenging a City Magistrate's order of attachment of land under Section 146(1) Cr.P.C. The magistrate had attached the property despite a pending civil suit (Original Suit No. 137 of 2026) that had granted an interim …
The revisionists challenged the trial court's order of 10‑08‑2026 that framed charges under Sections 109(1)/3(5), 115(3)/3(5), 117(2)/3(5), 351(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, contending that there was no evidence to support the charge of attempt to murder and that the injured's statement was …
The revisionist Rambahadur Singh filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 448 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, challenging a order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Shahjahanpur that rejected his application under Section 173(4) BNSS on the ground of lack of territorial …
The petitioner Lalu Singh filed a criminal revision challenging the dismissal of his complaint by the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 203 of the Cr.P.C. He alleged that the magistrate failed to apply a judicial mind to the CCTV footage and other evidence showing that police officials had …
The revisionists challenged the Additional Sessions Judge’s order rejecting their discharge application and directing them to appear for framing of charge under Section 302 IPC. They argued that the death certificate and medical reports indicated death due to cardiac‑respiratory failure and …
The revisionists, Kalyan Singh and another, challenged the trial court's order rejecting their discharge application in a complaint case under Section 406 IPC. They argued that the evidence recorded under Section 202 CrPC contradicted that under Section 244 CrPC and that the complaint was filed …
Ravi Kumar filed a criminal revision (No. 5578 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of a lower court. The revisionist was represented by counsel Raghuraj Singh, while the State and other respondents were represented by G.A. and Vishal Kumar. At the hearing, the …
The revisionists challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 29.11.2025, which had set aside their acquittal under Section 498-A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act and convicted them on probation. They contended that an earlier appeal (Criminal Appeal No.49 of 2025, Fateh Singh v. …
The revisionists filed a criminal revision under Sections 438/442 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) challenging a trial court order that summoned them in a complaint case for offences under Sections 323, 406 and 504 IPC. They argued that the summons violated Article 21(2) of the …
The revisionists Durga Yadav and others filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, challenging the Sessions Judge's order rejecting their discharge application under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code and directing framing of charge …
The revisionists challenged the Additional Session Judge’s order rejecting their discharge application under Section 308 of the IPC, arguing that the evidence did not show any intention to cause death and that the injuries were simple. The State contended that the assault caused serious injuries, …
The revisionist filed a criminal revision under the BNSS challenging the trial court's order rejecting a Section 319 CrPC application to summon two alleged participants, Tej Bahadur Singh and Vijayshri, in a dowry‑death case. The FIR alleged that the victim, Sarika, was subjected to dowry harassment …
The revisionists filed a criminal revision against the Additional Session Judge’s order rejecting their discharge application in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 149, 302/34, 307, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The petitioners did not wish to contest the merits and instead requested liberty to …
The petitioners filed Criminal Revision No. 5824 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order. At the admission stage, the petitioner's counsel, Raj Kishor Mishra, informed the court that the petitioners no longer wished to pursue the revision and sought to withdraw it. The State, …
The applicants, Dhrambir and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Crime No. 0290 of 2023) filed under Sections 420, 120B, 452, 504 and 506 IPC. During hearing, the applicants indicated they did not wish to contest the merits and only …
The applicants, Smt. Mithlesh Kashyap and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but later indicated through their counsel that they wished to withdraw the application. The opposite party alleged that the applicants had concealed material facts …
The applicant Rajneesh was charged under Sections 307 and 323 IPC for assaulting an informant and his relatives with a sickle, causing only superficial injuries. Both parties later entered into a compromise, which was verified by the trial court on 13‑02‑2026. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1645 of 2020) arising from offences under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The trial court, on an order dated 18‑12‑2025, verified a compromise between the parties, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 02‑12‑2023 and the cognizance order in Criminal Case No.1389 of 2024, alleging that the FIR was based on false facts. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel withdrew the merit‑based prayer …
The applicants, Geeta Devi and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, they discovered a clerical mistake in the application and sought to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh application with correct …
The applicants, Mujahid Hussain and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The State's counsel raised no objection to the …
The applicant, Bhairav @ Sadhu @ Jhallar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the proceedings of Case No.292 of 2015 (arising from NCR No.41 of 2014 under Sections 504 and 506 IPC) and to obtain protection while surrendering before the trial court. The State opposed …
The applicants Diwari Lal and nine others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3928 of 2021, which stemmed from offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had entered into a verified compromise deed, which was examined and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.16686 of 2024) arising from an FIR alleging that he procured a forged character certificate while a criminal case was pending against him. The FIR led to a charge‑sheet under Sections 419 …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑May‑2018, the cognizance order dated 5‑July‑2018 and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 2936 of 2018) arising from offences under IPC sections 354(kha), 452, 323 and 308. Both parties …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1246 of 2024) initiated under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 117(2) and 110 of the B.N.S. The applicants and the State of U.P. had entered into a compromise, which was …
The applicants filed an application under the inherent powers of the court seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 2128 of 2011, which involved offences under Sections 323, 324, 504 and 427 IPC. Both parties admitted that they had reached a compromise, which was verified by the trial court on 6 July 2024 …
The applicant filed an application under the inherent powers of the High Court to quash a charge‑sheet dated 27‑08‑2012 in a criminal case under Section 420 IPC and the cognizance order dated 01‑12‑2012. Both parties had entered into a compromise, which was verified by the trial court on 7‑June‑2024 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case alleging forgery, cheating and criminal intimidation in connection with a sale deed of agricultural land. They contended that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 4011 of 2018, which stemmed from a 1995 FIR alleging kidnapping under Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC. The dispute was settled amicably: the victim had married applicant No.1, lived together for 28 …
The applicants, Udaivir Singh Baghel and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants expressed a desire to withdraw the application, stating an intention to possibly file a fresh one …
The applicant, Jaki Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 7377 of 2024) arising from Crime No. 430 of 2023, which were instituted under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant argued that the dispute was …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 1 July 2018 and the cognizance order dated 8 January 2019 in Criminal Case No. 103 of 2019 (State vs. Anwar), which involved offences under Sections 354 and 452 of the IPC. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 8022 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise, which was verified by the trial court on 20‑12‑2025. The State’s …
The applicants filed an application under the inherent powers of the High Court to quash Criminal Case No. 17162 of 2007, which involved charges under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably reconciled, executed a verified compromise deed, and the trial court had confirmed the …
The applicants, Lakhami Singh and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 58212 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 325 IPC. While initially seeking quash, the applicants later …
The applicants, Shubham Pandey and eight others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire proceedings in State v. Sushil Kumar Pandey (Case No. 9667 of 2024) relating to offences under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the BNS …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Session Trial No. 1755 of 2025) arising from a Section 307 IPC case. The applicant later withdrew the merit of the application and only requested permission to move a discharge …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 31‑08‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 30‑09‑2024, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 9663 of 2024 (State v. Sushil Kumar). During hearing, the applicant’s counsel indicated …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 27‑08‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑09‑2024, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 9584 of 2024 (State v. Sushil Kumar & others) relating to offences under Sections 303(2) …
The applicant, Mohit Saini, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 324 and 504 IPC. He later indicated that he was not pressing any substantive relief and only …
The applicants, Krishna Mohan Shukla and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS against the State of U.P. and another party. The applicants failed to appear before the court on the original date and also on the revised call dated 28 April 2025. The learned Additional …
The applicant, Shyam Singh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant later expressed a desire to withdraw the application and sought liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. The Court considered …
The applicants, Rajesh Kumar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and summons in a criminal case and to obtain bail. The State opposed the quash but offered protection if the applicants surrendered. The Court, noting the alternative …
The applicants Kishun Yadav and six others filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar Negotiable Settlement Scheme (BNSS) seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 2260 of 2021 (State v. Kishan Yadav et al.) which involved offences under several IPC sections. Both parties had reconciled …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 2009 of 2020) arising from offences under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had entered into a voluntary compromise, which was verified by the Chief Judicial …
The applicants Maharam and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 09‑12‑2017 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 1919 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 323, 325 and 504 IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise, …
The applicants sought quash of a charge-sheet and cognizance order in a case under Section 506 IPC for a threatening letter allegedly dropped at the complainant's shop. The FIR named no specific accused and the investigation produced no witness testimony placing the applicants at the scene, nor did …
The applicant, Nazir Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 8729 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. During hearing, the applicant’s counsel withdrew the merit-based prayer and …
The applicant, Ramcharan @ Golu, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in a criminal case (Sections 504, 506, 306 IPC). The counsel later limited the prayer to seeking permission to surrender and to have a bail application heard …
Om Prakash appealed a criminal conviction before the Allahabad High Court. While the appeal was pending, a report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, dated 13 March 2026, confirmed that Om Prakash had died, and a death certificate was attached. The court considered whether the appeal could …
The applicants filed an application under the inherent powers of the High Court to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The civil court had verified a compromise between the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 23883 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 452, 323, 325 and 506 IPC. Both the applicants and the opposite parties jointly submitted that a compromise had been reached and was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑07‑2021 and the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No.1944 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 147, 308, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties jointly submitted that a compromise …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 994 of 2022) arising from an FIR alleging assault and threats while erecting an electric pole. They contended that the FIR was fabricated, there was no injury to the complainant, and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 3001 of 2021) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh against Kishan Kumar Saini under Sections 354A and 504 of the IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise, …
The High Court of Allahabad heard an application under Section 528 of the BNSS filed by Babulal and ten others seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the entire criminal proceedings against them. The applicants, not pressing any substantive relief, requested that the court direct them to surrender …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 9 July 2024 and the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 1771 of 2021 (State v. Virendra and others) relating to offences under Sections 308, 323 and 504 IPC. Both the applicants …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal case No. 13113 of 2025 (State v. Kamlesh Ojha et al.) involving offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 325, 504, 506 and 308. The parties had entered into a compromise on 29 July 2025, which was verified by …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 32608 of 2014) instituted under IPC sections 406 and 420, on the ground that the parties had entered into a verified compromise dated 23 July 2025. Both the applicant’s counsel and the …
The applicant, Mahendra Maurya, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 5663 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 419 and 420 IPC. During hearing, the applicant limited his request to obtaining permission to file a discharge …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 33811 of 2023, which involved charges of cheating (Sec. 420 IPC) and criminal breach of trust (Sec. 406 IPC). The parties had reconciled voluntarily and executed a verified …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case Crime No.248 of 2021) instituted under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. The trial court, on a direction dated 02.02.2026, verified that the parties had reached a compromise, which was recorded …
Anil Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. The applicant's counsel later discovered a clerical mistake and requested to withdraw the application, seeking liberty to file a fresh one with correct particulars. The State, represented by an AGA, raised …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 29‑08‑2024 and the related criminal proceedings under Section 386 IPC. The trial court had been directed to verify a compromise between the parties, which was duly verified on 16‑10‑2025. Both the …
The applicants, Smt. Taslim Akhtar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 11‑08‑2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 21‑03‑2024, and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No. 14342 of 2024 (State vs. …
The applicant Shishupal filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (S.S.T. No. 439 of 2018) arising from offences under IPC sections 308, 325, 323 and 504. The trial court had verified a compromise between the parties, a fact jointly acknowledged by both …
The appeal filed by U.S. Upadhaya and Hari Shanker Pandey against the State of U.P. remained pending for many years. No counsel appeared for the appellants, though the respondent's counsel was present. The court sought verification of the appellants' status and received a report confirming that both …
The applicant Arjun filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal case (Case No. 117 of 2013) arising from FIR under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. He alleged that the FIR was based on false facts, that the alleged victim was a major who voluntarily …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No.1862 of 2025, which arose from Crime No.279 of 2024 and was filed under Sections 318(4), 332(C) and 351(2) of the BNSS. Both parties jointly submitted that they had entered into a compromise, which was …
The Allahabad High Court entertained two applications: one seeking amendment to delete applicants 1‑6 from the party list, and another under Section 528 of the CrPC on behalf of applicants 7‑16 to quash the charge‑sheet and obtain protection from arrest. The court found no objection from the State …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a stay of the proceedings in a case pending since 2009. The High Court had earlier stayed the lower court proceedings, but no counsel appeared to press the application. The Supreme Court, in Asian …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 3218 of 2012) filed under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reconciled and entered into a court‑verified compromise, which was filed before the …
The applicant, Ramroop Upadhyay, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 35712 of 2025) arising from an FIR lodged by his daughter, Priyanka Tiwari, alleging that he forcibly changed a house lock and threatened her. The applicant contended that the …
The applicant, Harjot Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet, cognizance order, and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No. 9157 of 2024. After hearing, the applicant clarified that he does not wish to press the matter on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and summoning order dated 17‑06‑2016 in a criminal case pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Amroha. They contended that the cognizance and summoning order was issued on a …
The applicant, Sourab Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 5321 of 2009) arising from a robbery and assault (IPC Sections 392 and 356). He argued that the trial had stalled for over fifteen …
The applicant, Advocate Lallan Chaubey, sought to quash the criminal proceedings (CrPC Case No.1083 of 2014) and stay a non‑bailable warrant issued against him, invoking Section 528 of the BNSS (the modern equivalent of Section 482 CrPC). He argued that the charge‑sheet against him under IPC 406 …
The applicant filed an application under the inherent powers of the court seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 478 of 2013, which involved offences under Sections 323, 427, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(X) of the SC/ST Act. Both parties had reconciled voluntarily and executed a verified …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal case (Cr. No. 6041 of 2017) arising from offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 427, 452 and 506 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party had entered into a verified compromise, which was …
