Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL

71 judgments · newest first · showing 1–71

PINTU @ LAXMAN SARJERAO LONDHEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The petitioner, Pintu @ Laxman Sarjerao Londhe, filed a criminal writ petition seeking remission earned from 8 February 2015, contending that under a 13 November 2018 notification he should have been re‑entered into the Remission Book on 9 February 2015 after completing six years from his surrender …

DEEPAK ROHIDAS LOHKAREversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioner, Deepak Rohidas Lohkare, challenged a detention order dated 01/09/2025 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities (MPDA) Act, 1981. The order was based on alleged bootlegging activities and two in‑camera statements …

ABDUL KADIR S/O JULLUR REHMANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Abdul Kadir, sought permission to withdraw his writ petition and obtain liberty to file an appeal against a judgment and order dated 17/08/2021 passed by the Special Judge, NIA, Sessions Court in NIA Special Cases No.1/2019 and No.3/2019. The High Court considered whether a writ …

MRS. USHADEVI MISTRILAL YADAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Jail Ahmed Shaikh and Mrs. Ushadevi Mistrilal Yadav, filed criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners for either the initial hearing or the subsequent date. The State was …

BHIMRAO NAGURAO PANDITversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Bhimrao Nagurao Pandit, was convicted under Sections 302 and 397 IPC for murder and robbery, based primarily on the recovery of the victim's mobile phone and a knife from his residence four months after the incident. The prosecution's case relied on circumstantial evidence, including …

BHIMRAO NAGURAO PANDITversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Bhimrao Nagurao Pandit, was convicted under Sections 302 and 397 IPC for murder and robbery, based primarily on the recovery of the victim's mobile phone and a knife from his residence four months after the incident. The prosecution's case relied on circumstantial evidence, including …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusRAJESH MORESHWAR GAVATE

Allowed To be withdrawn

The State of Maharashtra prosecuted Rajesh Moreshwar Gavate before a magistrate, and subsequently filed an appeal before the Sessions Court, which was dismissed. The State then sought to file a further appeal, raising the question of its maintainability. The State's Additional Public Prosecutor …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusDATTATRAYA DAGDU BHATLAWANDE

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed an application for leave to appeal against the acquittal of Dattatraya Dagdu Bhatlawande dated 30 August 2024 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. The High Court examined the impugned judgment and found that arguable questions of law and fact were raised, warranting …

GODFREY THOMAS ALVARESversusTHE NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY AND ANR

Disposed Off

Godfrey Thomas Alvares, accused in an NIA case for organized human trafficking, suffered a serious cardiac ailment while in custody and applied for interim bail, which was rejected by the Special Judge. He filed Interim Application No.2309/2026 challenging the bail denial, arguing that his health …

SWAPNIL UTTAM PADWALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The deceased Ganesh was murdered after a financial dispute with accused Santosh Chavan; five accused were convicted of murder, conspiracy, and related offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The prosecution relied mainly on the testimony of Ganesh's sister (PW1) and CCTV footage, while the defence …

SURESH @ BALASAHEB BAPURAO SATPUTEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant Suresh Satpute was convicted by a Sessions Court for murder under IPC s.302, sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine. He appealed, arguing that the prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence without proving motive, the "last seen together" theory, or the authenticity of the …

VIRAN KANUBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicant, Viran Kanubhai Patel, filed an interim application (No. 2194 of 2026) in Criminal Writ Petition (ST) No. 4428 of 2024 seeking the unconditional withdrawal of the application. The respondent State of Maharashtra opposed the withdrawal. The learned counsel for the applicant argued that …

DASHRATH VITTHAL BHANGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Dashrath Vitthal Bhange filed an interim application in Criminal Appeal No. 319 of 2023 before the High Court of Bombay. The application was filed after the main appeal had been dismissed. The bench, comprising Justices Sarang V. Kotwal and Ashish S. Chavan, noted that the appeal was already …

DR PRATEEK KANAKIAversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered an interim application filed by Dr. Prateek Kanakia seeking relaxation of the condition that he remain within the Court's jurisdiction after his release ordered on 24 February 2026. The petitioner argued that he needed to travel across India for business and to …

NEHA MILINDRA GAUTAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Neha Milindra Gautam, filed a criminal writ petition seeking custody of a child. Counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition and to approach the appropriate forum, such as the Family Court or Civil Court, for custody matters. The Court considered the …

RAJEEV RAMCHANDRA PHERWANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Rajeev Ramchandra Pherwani, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the withdrawal of Chapter Case No.68 of 2025 and Court Case No.904 of 2025 by the authorities. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor recorded that the authorities had decided to withdraw the …

SWAPNIL HIRAYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking directions to the Special POCSO Court, Dindoshi (Court No.9), to decide a pending summary case (No.3/C/25) and a criminal miscellaneous application (No.128 of 2025) that had been delayed since January 2025. The petitioner alleged inordinate delay in the …

ASMA MOHAMMAD MUSTAFA KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition in 2022 challenging a detention order dated 3 December 2021. The petitioner was released on 4 December 2022, rendering the detention order moot. The respondent's counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been released and that no further …

SHARAD NANA MUKANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Sharad Nana Mukane, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 2590 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court. The record shows that after August 3, 2018, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition for admission. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …

AJAY VIJAY MOREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Ajay Vijay More, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The issue before the Court was whether it could allow the withdrawal of a pending writ petition. The Court exercised …

PALLU KAMLESH CHAUDHARIversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS

Allowed

The applicant filed an interim application seeking restoration of Criminal Writ Petition No.5226 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution. The applicant argued that the previous counsel failed to appear and that the detainee’s relatives were not informed, raising concerns of procedural …

SAYYED AMJADKHAN PATHANversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicant, Sayeed Amjadkhan Pathan, filed an interim application in a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application. The court noted this instruction and considered whether there was any …

KESHAV MALAJI MAKWANA AND ANRversusTHE SR. P.I. AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

On 15 June 2026 the petitioners, Keshav Malaji Makwana & Anr., failed to appear before the Bombay High Court for their writ petition. The matter was listed for hearing on the same day and again on 22 June 2026, but the petitioners remained absent. No representation was made on either occasion. The …

VIJAYA VYANKAT CHAVANversusSENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The writ petition filed in 2019 remained pending for several years without any action to circulate the matter. The petitioner's counsel reported an inability to obtain instructions from the petitioner, who had not communicated since the filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …

PURARAM DEEPARAM GUJAR @ RAAMJIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Puraram Deeparam Gujar, filed a writ petition (No.1459 of 2024) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Fauzan Shaikh, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The respondents, …

PARUL SATISHKUMAR PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 316 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court. After a prolonged pendency since 2017, the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, finding no objection, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the …

XYZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief, but the court had not been able to serve notice to the respondents because spare copies of the notice were not supplied. The petitioner later withdrew his brief and gave no objection to another advocate filing a …

MAMTA SHRI PRAKASH TIWARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Mamta Shri Prakash Tiwari, filed a writ petition challenging the investigation in criminal case No. 731 of 2017 registered at Wakad Police Station. The petitioner alleged that her daughter did not support the allegations in the FIR. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor informed …

BALKRISHNA LAXMAN MHATREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Balkrishna, filed Writ Petition No. 3208 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Rupesh Jaiswal and Anjali Raut, decided not to pursue the existing petition. He sought the …

MaharashtraversusJalindar Raju Nikam And ors.

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 205‑day delay in filing a petition for leave to appeal an acquittal granted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in a case involving offences under Sections 302, 341, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The delay arose …

XYZversusUJJWAL KRISHNA AND ANR

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 5375 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The court scheduled hearings on 6 April 2026 and 23 April 2026, but no party appeared on either date. The court noted that even on the final date of 17 June 2026, neither the …

SUMIT RAVINDRA CHANDANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The writ petition filed by Sumit Ravindra Chandane in 2018 remained pending for several years. The last listing was on 1 February 2019, after which neither the petitioner nor his counsel took steps to have the matter listed. The court observed that the petitioner appeared disinterested in …

VINODKUMAR KEHARISINHA BANJARAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Vinodkumar Banjara, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, with an acquittal on the charge under Section 504 IPC. The prosecution relied on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses, the brick‑kiln owner (PW‑1) and …

ZAINUL ABDIN ABDUL RASHID SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition alleging that the detainee was being held in police custody without legal authority. The Respondent, the State, through the Acting Chief Police Prosecutor, informed the Court that the detainee would be released on the same day and sought liberty to take …

NAVNEET RAGHUNATH KUMARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition seeking court directions to expedite the investigation of C.R.No.1474 of 2025 registered at Bandra police station. The respondent State argued that the accused is residing in the USA, making a swift investigation difficult, and that a Letter of Credit …

AVINASH SOMNATH PHULPAGAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant Avinash Phulpagare was convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and abetment of suicide (Sec. 201 IPC) for the death of an eight‑year‑old girl, Tanisha, based largely on the testimony of a twelve‑year‑old child witness and recovered wooden plank evidence. On appeal, the High Court examined …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSATISH RAMDAS PATIL AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra sought condonation of a 125‑day delay in filing a Criminal Application for leave to appeal against an acquittal order dated 22‑Nov‑2023. The delay arose because the certified copy of the judgment was obtained on 23‑Nov‑2023, scrutinised by the Director of Prosecution on …

CHANDANKUMAR UJAGAR SAHANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Partly Allowed

The appellant was convicted under IPC section 376(3) and POCSO sections 6 and 8 for raping a nine‑year‑old girl in a public washroom, based on the victim’s testimony, her mother’s account, a neighbour’s observation and medical evidence of genital injury. The trial court sentenced him to rigorous …

KAVITA SANJAY SONTAKKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Kavita Sanjay Sontakke, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus to compel the police to produce her daughter, alleging illegal detention. The police counsel informed the court that the daughter had already been handed over to the petitioner, rendering the …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusGUNVANT MOHAN BHONDEKAR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed an application for leave to appeal against the order of the trial court in a criminal matter involving Gunvant Mohan Bhondekar (Respondent No.1) and another respondent. The High Court considered whether leave to appeal should be granted, whether bail could be ordered …

ASHOK BABAN TAVHAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Ashok Baban Tavhare, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to unconditionally withdraw the petition. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, were represented by an Assistant Public …

PUNJAB YADAV KHODKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The appellant, Punjab Yadav Khodke, filed an interim application from jail alleging misconduct by his wife but did not specify any relief. The application sought a decision on his pending criminal appeal. The court noted that the appeal had already been scheduled for final disposal on 24 March 2026. …

GOURI S. BANERJEEversusRAJARSHI RADHAKRISHNA DWIVEDI AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Ms. Gauri S. Banerjee filed Writ Petition No. 5058 of 2014 in the Bombay High Court seeking to appear in person before the Court. The petition remained pending for several years and the petitioner failed to appear at any hearing. On 12 January 2026 the Court gave the petitioner a final opportunity …

SHIVAJI CHIMAJI GHOLAPversusTHE DEPUTY COLLECTOR REHABILITATION AND ORS

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 3601 of 2023 in the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the Deputy Collector, Rehabilitation, Pune and others. The petitioner later sought to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request for withdrawal and, after hearing counsel, granted …

MARUTI BHIKA PACHANGEversusTHE DEPUTY COLLECTOR REHABILITATION AND ORS

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Petitioners Tukaram Ganpat Pachange and Maruti Bhika Pachange filed writ petitions in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Deputy Collector, Rehabilitation, Pune and others. On counsel's instructions, they sought to withdraw the petitions. The Court granted permission to withdraw, …

MaharashtraversusAnand Vasudeo Chavan and Anr

Allowed

The State of Maharashtra filed an interim application seeking condonation of a delay of one year and 173 days to file an appeal against a Special Judge's order that acquitted the accused of IPC offences but convicted him under Sections 4, 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act, sentencing him to seven years' …

CHANDEVDAS RAMANAND DASversusTHE UNION TERRITORY OF DAMAN AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The appellant, Chandevdas Ramanand Das, was convicted by the Sessions Court for rape under Sections 376(f) and 376(i) of the Indian Penal Code and for sexual assault of a child under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. The victim, a seven‑year‑old girl, …

PRAFULLA MAHADEV MAHANGARE AND ORS.versusCOLLECTOR OF STAMPS PUNE RURAL AND ORS.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the demand for deficit stamp duty. They subsequently paid the outstanding stamp duty, rendering the subject matter of the petition moot. The petitioners argued that there was nothing left for the court to consider. The court accepted that the …

KALAMUDDIN MOHAMMAD ISTEYAR ANSARI @ KOAILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The appellant was convicted for raping a five‑year‑old girl by inserting his private part into her mouth, an offence under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment, a fine and compensation, …

KAPILDAV CHUGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Kapildev Chug, filed an application for leave to appeal against the acquittal granted by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 64th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai, in Criminal Case No.35/SW/2012 dated 12 March 2024. The High Court of Bombay examined the impugned judgment and identified arguable …

PINKY ANANDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Pinky Anand, filed a criminal writ petition alleging harassment on her social media page by unknown individuals on 14 May 2024, with objectionable photographs posted. She sought addition of several provisions of the Information Technology Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and …

NAJIM SALIM KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The appellants Najim Salim Khan and Farhan Salim Khan were convicted of murder under Section 302 r/w Section 34 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. They appealed, arguing that the prosecution’s evidence – especially the oral dying declaration and eye‑witness testimony – was unreliable and that …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusYOGESH SITARAM CHAVAN AND ANR

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal application seeking leave to appeal an acquittal of Yogesh Sitaram Chavan and another accused. The trial court had acquitted the respondents, prompting the State to challenge that decision. The application was argued by Ms. Supriya Kak on behalf of the …

KAMLESH GUPTAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The criminal writ petition filed by Mrs. Kamlesh Gupta remained pending since 2022. No counsel appeared to have the petition circulated, and the State had already filed a chargesheet. On the hearing date, no representative appeared for the petitioner. The Court observed that the petitioner had not …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusASHISHKUMAR VIJAYKUMAR SAHU

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 99‑day delay in filing a leave‑to‑appeal application against an acquittal order dated 2 December 2024 in a murder case (IPC 302). The High Court had issued notice to the respondent, who failed to appear. The Additional …

RAMESH @ BHAIJAN MOHAN PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The appellant, originally accused No.2, was convicted along with two others for dacoity with murder and criminal conspiracy under Sections 396, 397 and 120‑B of the IPC, receiving life imprisonment and a fine. The prosecution’s case rested on the recovery of stolen idols and other articles from the …

TANUJA JIVAK GHADGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Tanuja J. Ghadge filed a criminal writ petition seeking police protection for herself, her husband and witnesses, the arrest of accused persons, and compensation. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the accused had already obtained bail from the Special Court on 6 February 2025, …

SUBHASH MAHADEO SATHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS.

Disposed Off

Petitioner Subhash Mahadeo Sathe filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later moved the court requesting permission to withdraw the petition and to pursue any other appropriate remedy. The respondents opposed the withdrawal. The Court …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusROHIT RAM HILAM AND ANR

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed an application for leave to appeal against the order passed by the trial court in the case of Rohit Ram Hilam (ALS/41/2025). The High Court examined whether there were arguable questions of law or fact that warranted a further appeal. After reviewing the submissions of …