Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
139 judgments · newest first · showing 1–139
The petitioner, Sumit Rastogi, who operates a truck (registration U.P.-14/ET-8623) in the National Capital Region, sought re‑registration after the 10‑year permit expired, arguing that vehicles may operate until they reach 15 years of age. He filed a representation dated 1 August 2026 with the …
Petitioner Sita Ram filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue, Azamgarh) to decide the pending revenue case No. 3642 of 2024 within the time frame prescribed under Section 38(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The State and the Gaon Sabha …
Petitioner Hari Shankar Mishra filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial‑1st) Varanasi to decide Revision No. 2330 of 2025 (Computer Case C‑202514000002330) under Section 219 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act read with Section 210 of the Uttar …
The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged a tribunal order dated 14 October 2024 that had set aside disciplinary proceedings against Inspector Prem Veer Singh Rana, alleging that the tribunal failed to consider the respondent's defence and issued a non‑speaking, unseasoned order. The incident involved a …
The petitioner, Amod Kumar Singh, obtained a ten‑year mining lease through an e‑auction by bidding Rs 112 per cubic metre, higher than the reserved price of Rs 110. The Additional District Magistrate later issued an order, based on a 4 February 2026 notification amending the Uttar Pradesh Minor …
The petitioner, a Circle Officer, was suspended on 15‑02‑2019 and penalised for allegedly leaking confidential information during a criminal investigation, based on call records showing personal calls with a woman. He challenged the disciplinary enquiry, the suspension order, and the subsequent …
M/s Gangotri Stone Crusher challenged a notice issued by the District Magistrate alleging a violation of its storage licence and demanding a payment of Rs. 15,36,800. The petitioner sought judicial interference, arguing that the inspection was conducted without proper procedure and that the …
The petitioner, Ayushman Choudhary, a member of the Scheduled Caste 'Chamar', challenged the rejection of his caste certificate application, which was denied on the ground that his father had left the family and moved to Uttarakhand, raising a domicile issue. The petitioner submitted his mother's …
The Private Motor Operators Union challenged a Ministry of Road Transport and Highways order dated 17 November 2025 that required its vehicles to obtain fitness certificates exclusively through an Automated Testing Station (ATS) at Varanasi, alleging it forced vehicles to travel outside permitted …
The petitioner, Anupma, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the electricity authorities to provide her a residential electricity connection. The respondents, including the state electricity board and distribution companies, indicated that the petitioner’s in-laws objected to the …
The petitioner, Siya Maternity Centre, challenged the sealing of its premises and the filing of an FIR. The State of U.P. sought an adjournment to obtain written instructions on whether the sealing should continue despite a final report. The court noted that the petitioner's earlier challenge to the …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, challenged an e‑auction notice dated 4 August 2026, arguing that the auction was conducted while his writ petition was pending. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, contended that bids were not public and sought an adjournment to allow the …
The petition was filed by Naresh Singh, who was the Chowki In‑charge, challenging a tribunal order that had upheld a charge of negligence for failing to prevent a second explosion of seized explosives. On 7 November 2023 a large quantity of illegal firecrackers and related materials were seized from …
The petitioner, Chintu Tharu, filed a writ petition seeking compensation of Rs.5,00,000 for the death of his son caused by electrocution allegedly due to the negligence of Purvanchal Vidhut Vitrana Nigam Ltd. The respondents submitted a recommendation dated 21 July 2026 authorising the payment of …
The petitioner, Shri Sagar Parecha, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 34682 of 2026) challenging an order. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the issues raised were already decided in the order dated 28 July 2026 disposing of Writ‑C No. 27622 of 2026 (Shri Jitendra Pratap Singh Yadav v. State …
The petitioner, a stage carriage operator, applied on 16 July 2025 for approval of a revised timetable after other operators objected to the existing schedule. The transport authority consulted other local bodies and submitted their views but has not yet decided on the petitioner's application. The …
The petitioner, Yusuf Faiyaz, sought a writ directing the transport authority to issue a permit for bus No. UTC 1383, claiming he needed the permit to recover the bus that his mother had originally owned. The bus had been transferred by the mother to her brothers‑in‑law, who subsequently sold it to …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Gond, challenged the rejection of his application for a caste certificate on the ground that the Scrutiny Committee failed to consider a 6 May 2020 report from the Backward Class Welfare Directorate indicating that his father belongs to the Scheduled Tribe Gond. The …
Petitioners alleged that their vehicles were wrongfully seized by the police and a transport company without proper challans being issued. The respondents contended that the seizure was justified because the vehicles were overloaded by 23 tonnes, had an expired permit, and unpaid road tax, and they …
Petitioners Kunal Mittal and another sought relief concerning a No Objection Certificate (NOC) issued for a plot where they were selected as dealers for a retail outlet. They filed a withdrawal application after the NOC was issued, arguing that the NOC had been wrongly granted and that they faced …
The petitioner, Sanjay Tiwari, sought to resume mining operations and to quash a recovery notice and the order of the District Magistrate dated 1 July 2026 alleging illegal mining. The State, represented by the Chief Standing Counsel, agreed to conduct a fresh inspection upon notice to the …
The petitioner Abdul Samad challenged an order dated 25 March 2019 issued by the Additional District Magistrate demanding payment for alleged illegal mining and imposing a blacklist. The petitioner claimed that payments had already been made in excess of the demand and sought relief from coercive …
The petitioner, Yogendra Premani, challenged two orders of the District Magistrate: an order dated 8 June 2023 cancelling a lease under the Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 2021, and a later order dated 7 March 2025 directing adjustment and refund of the balance. The petitioner …
Azhar Khan, the petitioner, holds a Wood-Based Industry Licence and sought a writ of certiorari to quash proceedings for the proposed transfer, change of name, and change of ownership of his licence, alleging that he never applied for such transfer. He submitted a letter dated 22 May 2026 to the …
Petitioner Mohammad Kalim filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Engineer (respondent No.3) to pass an order on his application dated 15 June 2026 and to correct the demand load and erroneous billing of his electricity account. The petition alleged wrong billing and demanded …
Petitioners Arvind Swaroop and another applied for a domicile certificate, which was rejected on 14 March 2026 because they had not attached a copy of the parivaar register. They had applied to be included in the register and were awaiting the outcome of that appeal. The State argued that a current …
Petitioners Arvind Swaroop and another challenged the rejection of their applications for caste certificates by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The rejection orders, dated 24 October 2024 and 14 March 2026, cited the absence of a latest copy of the "parivaar register" as the reason. Petitioners argued …
The petitioner, a mining operator, claimed that the Divisional Forest Officer had illegally obstructed the transport of mined material on a public road in Baghpat, causing the expiry of his mining permit. He sought a writ of mandamus directing the District Magistrate/District Mining Officer to …
Surendra Singh Bhati filed a writ petition challenging a show‑cause notice dated 14 May 2026 issued by an oil company. The petitioner submitted a reply on 22 May 2026 contesting the notice. The respondents, including the Union of India and the oil company, were directed to consider the petitioner’s …
The petitioner, a competing dealer, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate not to issue a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to a private respondent selected by Indian Oil Corporation as a dealer. The petition claimed that the selection process was ambiguous and that …
Petitioner Ravi Yadav filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a character certificate issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner, through counsel Kartikey Mishra, indicated that he would be advised not to prosecute. The State, represented by Additional Chief …
Harendra Baliyan filed a writ petition seeking security and submitted a representation dated 17 August 2026 to the District Magistrate. The petitioner, through counsel, requested that the court direct the District Magistrate to consider this representation. The State, represented by the Additional …
Petitioner Shakil Ahmad applied for a character certificate, which the Superintendent of Police rejected without providing any reason. The petitioner had a criminal case pending against him, but obtained a stay of that case from the High Court on 30 January 2026. The petitioner challenged the …
Petitioner Mukesh Siddharth filed a writ petition seeking relief from a demand by the Senior Superintendent of Police for 100% cost of security provided to him. The police later issued a revised demand of 10% cost on 1 August 2026. The petitioner, through counsel Aditya Prasad Mishra, argued that …
Madhav Raj Agarwal, a person with low vision, claimed a reservation seat under the benchmark disability provision of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016. Although his medical board assessment recorded only 1% disability and the appellate board found no disability, a medical …
Petitioner Pranjal Garg, who has a benchmark low‑vision disability of 60%, obtained a medical certificate confirming this disability but the Medical Board reduced his disability percentage to 30%, a finding the petitioner contended was beyond the Board’s authority. He approached the Allahabad High …
The petitioner, Naveen Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari order to quash the order of the Superintendent of Police (Respondent No.3) that dismissed his online application for a character certificate. The State argued that a Government Order dated 9 April 2026, issued in accordance …
The petitioner, Zara Construction, filed a writ petition seeking immediate release of Rs. 25,86,657 plus GST from the State of U.P. and a distribution company, alleging that the amount was outstanding as shown by internal communications dated March 25, 2026, September 13, 2019 and May 12, 2020. The …
Shivam Kharabanda filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash the Deputy Commissioner of Police’s rejection of his character certificate dated 05‑07‑2025. The State relied on a Government Order dated 9 April 2026, issued pursuant to a prior judgment of the Allahabad High Court in Writ‑C No. …
The petitioner, Mukesh Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide his representation dated 28 October 2023, which sought adjustment under Rule 41(h) of the Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 2021. The petitioner relied on an earlier order …
The petitioners, the State and four officials, challenged a judgment of the State Public Service Tribunal that allowed the claim of a deceased employee’s legal representatives for promotion. The petitioners argued that the employee had refused to exercise an option for promotion and that there was …
The petitioner, Sarmast Khan, filed a writ petition seeking two orders of mandamus: (i) to suspend the effect of an order dated 19‑12‑2025 passed by the District Magistrate penalising him for alleged unauthorised sand extraction, and (ii) to direct the Commissioner of Jhansi to expeditiously dispose …
Petitioner Mrs. Hari Sumit Aarya filed a writ petition seeking permission to apply for a dealership. After filing, she discovered a brochure and other materials and decided to withdraw the petition and re‑file it afresh. The petition was not yet argued before the court. The learned judges allowed …
The petitioner, Aditya Narayan Maurya, alleged that his father's electric connection, installed for a bore‑well, was non‑functional yet electricity bills continued to be raised. He filed an application on 29 January 2026 with the supply company (respondent No.2) seeking redress. The petitioner …
The petitioner, a minor represented through his father, challenged two orders dated 7 August 2025 and 22 January 2026 issued by the Tehsildar rejecting his applications for a caste certificate, alleging that the orders were unreasoned and contrary to a prior judgment in Mithlesh Kumar (Minor) v. …
The petitioner, Sangam Lal, applied online on 10 February 2026 for a character certificate, which required the Commissioner of Police to issue it despite a pending criminal case against him. The State, through its counsel, cited a Government Order dated 9 April 2026, issued pursuant to a Lucknow …
Petitioner Vaibhav Enterprises sought payment of Rs.7,98,009 for work performed, alleging the distribution company had not paid the full amount. The State and the distribution company contended that only about Rs.3 lakh remained unpaid due to tax deductions. The court directed the distribution …
Petitioner Rakesh Singh applied for a character certificate, which remained pending with the District Magistrate. He filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Magistrate to issue the certificate. The State of U.P. informed the Court that a Government Order dated 9 April 2026 had been issued, …
Mrs. Mamta Guragain, appearing for petitioner Sneha Verma, sought a family member certificate required to claim a family pension and a compassionate appointment after the death of her husband, who was her second marriage. The petitioner had earlier filed Writ A No. 10239 of 2025, which was disposed …
Mohan Singh excavated soil to level his agricultural land. The District Magistrate imposed a Rs 5,00,000 penalty under U.P. Minor Mineral (Concession) Rules, 2021, which was confirmed by the Commissioner. Singh contended that the excavation was merely soil removal, exempt under a 2018 Government …
The petitioner, Shubham Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the State respondents to conduct a spot inspection of alleged illegal mining activities and to cancel the lease granted to a third respondent. The petition relied on photographs showing mining after dark. The …
The applicants, Matsajivi Sahkari Samiti Ltd and two others, filed a review petition in the Allahabad High Court after their writ petition was disposed on 18 February 2026 and a Special Leave Petition was granted liberty to file a review. They claimed they were prepared to deposit the remaining …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State’s Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim …
Petitioners Dinesh @ Vinit and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others, seeking relief that is not specified in the record. The petitioners' counsel, Devendra Pratap Yadav, was not present before the …
The petitioner, Rajesh Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted that, while the charge sheet …
The petitioners, Dinesh Tyagi alias Guddu and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance …
Petitioner Rajendra filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 1879 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel was absent and no interim relief had been obtained. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time (eflux of time). …
The petitioner, Gyanwati, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed the bench of this …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence of an …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted that, …
Rakesk Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh, represented by the Advocate General, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had …
The petitioner, Dinesh Vishwakarma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the uncertainty …
The petitioner, Imran @ Bihari, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18671 of 2022 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petitioner's counsel was not present during the hearing. No interim order had been passed in the matter. The Court observed that the petition had become …
Hoti Lal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. Since the cognizance status was uncertain and an interim order was …
Petitioner Waqar Ahmad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court …
The petitioner, Banti Sikarwar, filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 16‑04‑2025 that gave rise to Crime No. 55 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The respondent‑4 submitted a short counter‑affidavit stating that the parties had reached an …
The petitioner, Nadeem Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The …
Smt Sangeeta and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The petitioners argued that without cognizance they should not …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but mediation between the parties failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. The Court noted the absence of representation and the failure of mediation. Consequently, the Court dismissed the …
The petitioners, Vinay @ Vinesh Kumar and eight others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18568 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Ajay Kumar, was not present, and no interim relief had been granted. The court observed that a considerable lapse of time had occurred, rendering the petition …
The petitioners, Noor Hasan and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking protection from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the …
Prem Shankar Sharma filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18660 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. The petitioner was to be represented by counsel Rahul Kumar Sharma, but he was not present on the hearing …
Petitioners Shyam Tiwari and six others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18842 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. Counsel for the petitioners, Prashant Shukla, was not present before the bench. No interim order …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest, but did not appear before the court. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, yet it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …
Petitioners Prabhakar Tripathi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners did not appear before the High Court. The …
The petitioners sought relief in a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation and consequently dismissed the petition. The dismissal was based on …
The petitioners, Firoz Ahmad and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. …
Smt. Prabha Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18572 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and seven others. The petition sought relief, but the petitioner's counsel was not present at the hearing. No interim order had been passed in the matter. …
A writ petition was filed by Aman Kumar, a minor, challenging his potential arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State was represented by three advocates. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …
The petitioners, Rajan Saini and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to …
The petitioners, including Aditya Nishad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners argued that without cognizance, they could be …
The petitioner, Taufiq, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the uncertainty regarding cognizance and, …
The petitioners, Rinkupal @ Rinku and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief after mediation between them and the State of U.P. and three others failed. The court noted that mediation had indeed broken down. No counsel appeared on …
Petitioners Mahbish and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the uncertainty …
The petitioners, Shubham Agarwal and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The petition alleged that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the …
Mohit Mishra filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18651 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Syed Mohammad Abbas Abdy, was not present at the hearing. No interim order had been passed in the matter. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous …
Smt. Shabnam and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners. The Attorney General for the State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared for the petitioner and no interim order was passed. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous …
Arun Kumar and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim …
Petitioners Ummed Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest after a charge sheet was filed against them. The State’s counsel was uncertain whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted that while the charge sheet existed, the …
Petitioner Suneeta Patel filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel was absent and no interim order had been passed. The court observed that the petition had become stale due to the passage of time. Consequently, the court held that the …
The petitioner, Rambabu Chaturvedi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner and no interim order was made. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the judges …
Petitioners Prashant Kumar Pandey and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …
Roshan Ali and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner's counsel, Mohd. Naushad, was not present, and no interim order had been passed. The court observed that the petition had …
Anwar Husain and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging their potential arrest. The State of U.P. submitted a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners sought relief to prevent arrest pending …
Vidya and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging their potential arrest. The State informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence of an …
Petitioners Suresh Gupta and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an …
Petitioners Gourav and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State argued that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order …
The petitioners, Tinkal and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The parties attempted mediation, which ultimately failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. The …
Susheel Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim order, …
The petitioners, Pranay Kumar Seth and six others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition sought relief after a mediation process between the parties failed. The court noted that no counsel …
The petitioners, Narendra @ Narendra Pal, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh and three others responded, indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …
The petitioners, Parvej and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. In …
Ambrish Pratap Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim order in the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18823 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. After the charge-sheet was submitted in the underlying criminal case, the petitioners, through counsel, sought to withdraw the writ petition. The respondents opposed the withdrawal. The …
The petitioner, Bhole Verma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High …
The petitioners, Shivbhan Singh alias Beta and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. They contended that although a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer, it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police …
Shahbaz filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest in a case where a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that while the charge sheet was submitted, it was unclear whether …
Petitioners Smt Sangeeta Kumari and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of …
Shane Arab and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State of U.P. submitted a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners argued that arrest should not be permitted until …
Petitioners Hukumat Rai Shadija and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …
Vaishnavi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking protection from arrest. The State had already filed a charge sheet, but it was uncertain whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court observed that an …
The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Yadav and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …
Petitioners Smt Shivani Gupta and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The Court …
The petitioner, Son Singh Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the …
The petitioner, Rahul Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted …
Usha Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging her potential arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the uncertainty regarding cognizance and, considering …
Petitioners Smt. Arisha and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted …
The petitioners, Rizwan Saiyab Siddiqui and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. They argued that although a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer, the court had not yet taken cognizance of the police report. The State, …
The petitioners, Shahrukh and nine others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. In the absence of …
Petitioners Kanhaiya Lal Chauhan and 152 others filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking a copy of the English translation of a Government Order dated 23 May 2014. The petition was heard by Hon'ble Justices Arindam Sinha and Satya Veer Singh. Counsel for the …
Ram Chandra, a senior citizen, alleged that his sons (private respondents 4 and 5) had driven him out of his house and filed a representation on 23 February 2026 with respondent No.2 seeking assistance. The court examined the petition and decided that it was not necessary to issue notice to the …
Petitioner No.1, Vice‑President of a society, and Petitioner No.3, appointed Secretary, challenged an order dated 30 June 2025 by the Director/Registrar refusing to confirm the Secretary's appointment. They argued that the order was passed ex parte, without any notice of the hearing, violating …
The petitioners, a registered society running an old age home, challenged the State's refusal to renew their 2022 management agreement and the issuance of a tender for a new agency. The State argued that the agreement had expired and it was within its discretion to appoint another agency under the …
The appellant filed a first appeal against a Family Court judgment dated 7 September 2021 that ordered maintenance pendente lite. The appellant later filed a withdrawal application on 27 January 2026, citing that the parties had settled their differences as reflected in a joint supplementary …
The appellant Ram Kumar appealed against a Family Court order dated 4 April 2022 directing him to pay maintenance pendente lite of Rs 10,000 per month to his wife Sangeeta Gupta. While the maintenance order was in force, the appellant filed a restitution petition which he later failed to prosecute, …
The appellant, a divorced wife, challenged an ex-parte decree of divorce that did not address her claim for maintenance. She sought to appeal the judgment solely to obtain maintenance, while the respondent argued that the Family Court's decision was correct on facts and law. The court noted that …
The Union of India, as employer, challenged two orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT): one dated 2 August 2010 that set aside a minor punishment imposed on employee Shyama Shukla, and a subsequent order dated 11 May 2012 dismissing a review of that decision. The petitioners sought to …
The petitioner, Madhu Vachaspati Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner argued that the school’s existence was not recognized, seeking relief. Respondent No.3, the District Magistrate, subsequently acknowledged the …
The petitioners, Committee of Management of Hindustan Aeronautics Karamchari Sehkari Awas Samiti Ltd and another, sought a mandamus directing the respondents to enforce an interim order dated 8 May 2025 issued by an arbitral tribunal, despite a later order of this Court on 30 May 2025 staying the …
The appellant, Nidhi Chaudhary, married Vikas Chaudhary on 22 October 2023, which was a second marriage for both parties. The respondent alleged that the appellant's earlier marriage to Naru Gopal Singh had not been dissolved and obtained an ex‑parte judgment on 28 October 2024 declaring the …
