Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
34 judgments · newest first · showing 1–34
The applicant, Deependra Prakash Tiwari, filed a civil contempt application alleging that the opposite party, District Magistrate Kritika Jyotsana, had failed to comply with a Writ Court order. The opposite party, through Additional Chief Standing Counsel Shri Sunil Bajpai, produced a written …
Suresh Kumar Mishra filed a civil contempt application against Ashish Tiwari, Senior Superintendent, Adarsh Karagaar, Lucknow. The applicant’s counsel, Ashok Kumar and Chandra Prakash, were not present in court and no request for adjournment was made. The bench noted the absence of counsel and the …
The applicant, Rajeev Seth, filed a civil contempt application (No. 4333 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The matter was listed for hearing on the revised list. Neither the applicant’s counsel, Anilesh Tewari, nor any representative appeared, and no request for adjournment …
The applicant, Radhey Shyam Yadav, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel for the applicant appeared, and no request for adjournment was made. The respondent's counsel, Dr. Uday Veer Singh, was present. The Court observed that the application lacked …
The applicant, Indra Jeet Singh and others, filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant, nor was any request made for an adjournment or additional time to comply with procedural requirements. The court noted that the applicant …
Ram Naresh Singh filed a civil contempt application against Divisional Forest Officer Brij Mohan Shukla. The petitioner did not appear before the court, while the State's standing counsel was present. The court observed that, due to the passage of time, the contempt petition had become infructuous. …
Ram Singh filed a civil contempt application against Divisional Forest Officer Brij Mohan Shukla. The petitioner failed to appear before the court, and the standing counsel for the State was the only party present. The court observed that, owing to the passage of time, the contempt petition had …
The applicant, Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, filed a civil contempt application against Girish Kumar Singh, District Inspector of Schools, Sultanpur. The matter was listed as non‑adjournable and was called before the bench. The applicant’s counsel did not appear and no request for adjournment was made. …
Shilpi Devi filed a civil contempt application against Saumya Guru Rani, the Chief Development Officer of Hardoi. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. On the scheduled date, the applicant’s counsel, Babita Singh and Sandhya Devi, were not present and no request for …
The applicant, Tasneem Fatima, filed a contempt petition alleging violation of a judgment dated 26.05.2023 in Writ‑A No.3795 of 2023. The opposite party, Sri Amit Mohan Mishra, submitted a compliance affidavit stating that the authority had decided not to pay the applicant's salary following an …
The applicant, Chander Sen Rathore, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the applicant and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of representation and the lack of any request to postpone the hearing. Accordingly, the …
The petitioner, Shravan Kumar Singh, filed a civil contempt application against Anoop Kumar, District Inspector of Schools, Gonda. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but the petitioner's counsel, Saryu Prasad Tiwari, was absent and no request for adjournment was …
The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the District Inspector of Schools, Jalaun, had failed to comply with a court order dated 29 May 2019 issued in Writ Petition No.15686 of 2019 (Ashok Kumar Pandey & 12 others v. State of U.P. and others). The respondent filed an affidavit …
Amita Tripathi filed a civil contempt application (No. 199 of 2022) alleging that the order dated 27‑10‑2021 passed by the writ court had not been complied with by the respondents, including Sri Deepak Kumar, Principal Secretary, Department of Basic Education, Government of U.P. The respondents, …
In Civil Revision No. 84 of 2019, the revisionist Bharatdwaj filed a petition against Vasdev and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and there was no request for adjournment. The court noted the absence of representation and dismissed the petition in default on 10 July 2024. The …
Amar Kumar filed a civil contempt application (No. 1721 of 2014) against Shri Sadakant, Principal Secretary, Housing and Urban Development, Lucknow. The petitioner failed to appear in court and did not seek any adjournment. Counsel for the respondent, Nadeem Murtaza and Ratnesh Chandra, were …
In Contempt Application (Civil) No. 415 of 2021, the applicants Samar Bahadur Singh and another sought relief against Aradhna Shukla, Secretary Secondary Education, Lucknow, and others. The applicant's counsel, Pradeep Kumar Singh, was listed, but no one appeared in court to press the application. …
The petitioners, Jiyaul Hasan and others, filed a contempt application (Civil) No. 1587 of 2020 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, alleging that the respondent, Rajpal Singh, Engineer-in-Chief, P.W.D., Lucknow, had failed to comply with a prior judgment and order. The petitioners, …
Mohd. Shamshad filed a civil contempt petition (No. 1205 of 2020) against Shlok Kumar, Superintendent of Police, Hamirpur. The petitioner’s counsel did not appear, and no adjournment was sought. State counsel Sanjay Trivedi appeared and submitted that the order of the Writ Court had been complied …
The petitioner, Vidyut Parishad Ashulekhak Sangh Thoru, filed a civil contempt application (No. 429 of 2015) against Sanjay Agarwal and others. On the hearing date, no representative of the petitioner appeared, though the State's standing counsel was present. The court observed that the passage of …
Ashok Kumar filed a civil contempt petition (No. 1880 of 2020) against Smt. Geeta Singh, President of a Co‑Operative Wholesale Society. The petition was listed for hearing without any request for adjournment. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The Court observed …
Alim Abbas filed a contempt application against Mr. Deepak Kumar and two others. The matter was listed under the heading “These matters, be not adjourned”. Neither the counsel for the applicant nor the counsel for the opposite parties appeared before the court, and no request for adjournment was …
The applicant, Mohd Israil, filed a civil contempt application against Rajendra Pratap Dios Andambedkar Nagar. The applicant failed to appear before the court to prosecute the application, although the standing counsel was present to assist. The court noted the absence of the applicant and the lack …
The petition filed by the Divisional Forest Officer and another under Article 227 challenged an interim order dated 27 January 2025 that directed the petitioner to deposit back wages within three months, a deadline later extended by three weeks on 28 April 2025. The respondents contended that …
The petitioners, including the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Forest, Government of U.P., sought relief from the High Court under Article 227, challenging an interim order dated 27 January 2025 that required the respondents to deposit back wages. The respondents argued that the back wages …
Tanuja Khare filed a civil contempt application against Dr. Mahendra Dev and others, alleging non‑payment of interest at 7% per annum. The District Inspector of Schools, Unnao, testified that the interest had already been forwarded to the treasury on 14 March 2024 and produced a copy of the order. …
The applicant, Anil Kumar Srivastava, filed a civil contempt application against Muni Raj, Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ayodhya. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, before Hon’ble Justice Manish Kumar. Neither the applicant’s counsel nor any representative …
In a civil contempt application, the applicant Magan Bihari and others alleged that a sum ordered by the writ court had not been credited to their account. The opposite party, Addl. Chief Secretary Anil Garg, filed an affidavit stating that the writ court's order had been complied with, which the …
Kalika Prasad filed a writ petition (No. 18756 of 2019) challenging the High Court's order that released the landlord and dismissed the tenant's appeal. The petitioner failed to appear before the court even after a revised call. The court noted that factual findings had already been recorded in …
Juvenile X, through his natural guardian, filed a criminal revision (No. 1318 of 2024) against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but no party appeared when the case was taken up. The learned Additional Government Advocate represented …
The appellant, U.P.S.R.T.C. Faizabad, filed a first appeal against Order No. 421 of 2008. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel for the appellant appeared, and no request for adjournment was made. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal in default. The …
Magma Hdi General Insurance Co Ltd filed a first appeal before the Allahabad High Court against Order No. 335 of 2018. The appellant’s counsel, Indrajeet and Amit Kumar Srivastava, were listed but no representative appeared in court on the scheduled date. No request for adjournment or any other …
The applicants, Dharmendra Nishad and two others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in POCSO Case No. 11/2018 and to stay any further proceedings, relying on a joint compromise dated 20‑08‑2025. They also invoked the …
Juvenile X, through his father, filed a criminal revision petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared from either side when the matter was taken up. The learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The court …
