Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
101 judgments · newest first · showing 1–101
The appellant, Babanrao Dherange, challenged a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, alleging that the structure in question was a temporary erection and therefore subject to removal. The trial court …
The appellant, Pawan Kumar Hariprashad Shukla and another, filed an appeal against order No.762 of 2026 passed by the High Court of Bombay, together with interim application No.5887 of 2026. The appellant, through counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw the appeal. The court examined …
The applicant filed an interim application seeking to amend a contempt petition to specifically implead the trustees of Respondent No.1 and the directors of Respondent No.2, which were not named in the original petition. The court noted that the amendment was necessary in view of an order dated 30 …
The appellant, Mrs. Hansaben Manilal Panchal, filed an appeal against an order of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) seeking inclusion of her name in the certified list of tenants. The appellant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the appeal and instead approach …
The applicant, Maya Raju Patel, filed an appeal and sought condonation of a five‑day delay in filing the appeal. An interim application was filed before the High Court of Bombay requesting the court to excuse the delay. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Ramesh D. Kamble, submitted that the respondents …
The appellant, Mr. Naresh Ishwar Trimukhe, appealed against an order of the Trial Court that rejected his application for injunctive relief against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai for enforcing a notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1988. The High Court had …
The appellant, Mr. Madhukar Vyankatrao Kharatmol, appealed an order that rejected his application for an injunction against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai for enforcing a notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1988. The trial court had denied the injunction in …
The original suit (Civil Suit No. 55 of 1989) was dismissed by the trial court on 19 April 2012. The defendant appealed (Appeal No. 718 of 2012) which was dismissed on 30 November 2021. A review application (Civil Review Application No. 8 of 2022) was filed and the appellate court, on 4 October …
Hariprasad Ganpat Barai filed an interim application in Writ Petition No. 7827 of 2023 before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant, through counsel Ashish Dubey and Gayatri Gupta, sought the court's permission to withdraw the interim application while retaining the liberty to pursue appropriate …
The plaintiffs, heirs of the late Anthony Joseph Misquitta, filed a suit seeking a declaration that the 1960 Agreement for Sale and the 1963 Deed of Sale were forged and therefore void, along with related injunctions. They relied on a handwriting expert's opinion dated 25 September 1997 that the …
The applicant filed an interim application seeking to bring the legal heirs of a deceased sole appellant onto the record. The counsel for the applicant requested permission for this amendment, arguing that it was filed within the prescribed time. The court examined whether the application was timely …
The High Court of Bombay entertained a praecipe filed to amend a typographical error in its earlier judgment dated 27 July 2026. The error involved the use of the word "Plaintiffs" instead of "Defendants" in the second last line of paragraph 17. The Court examined the request and found no …
The appellants, Harshad Gawde and Gorakh Sable, appealed against a trial court order that enjoined them from entering the suit properties and from creating any third‑party rights. The plaintiff, Swati Builders, sought a declaration that the sale deed dated 5 May 2022, executed by the appellants as …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the request and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. Consequently, there were no remaining matters for consideration, and any pending applications, if …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the request and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. Consequently, there were no remaining matters for consideration, and any pending applications, if …
The appellant, Suresh Sundar Kamble, appealed against the trial court's order dismissing his notice of motion seeking the appointment of a court receiver and an injunction to prevent creation of third‑party rights over a property. The respondents clarified that they do not intend to sell the …
The petitioners, a group of agriculturists, challenged a common order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal dated 3 September 2024 which had set aside a 5 December 2023 order that upheld the tenancy of their predecessor Anya Patil and allowed the respondents’ review applications. The dispute centered …
The appellant, Suresh Sundar Kamble, appealed against the trial court's order dismissing his notice of motion seeking the appointment of a court receiver and an injunction to prevent creation of third‑party rights over a property. The respondents clarified that they do not intend to sell the …
The petitioners, a group of agriculturists, challenged a common order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal dated 3 September 2024 which had set aside a 5 December 2023 order that upheld the tenancy of their predecessor Anya Patil and allowed the respondents’ review applications. The dispute centered …
The appellant, Aachal Singh Kumpavat, appealed an order dated 16 March 2024 that sought interim relief against a notice issued under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 concerning a 18 × 18 ft structure at Plot No.118, Chembur. The trial of the suit had commenced and the trial …
The Bombay High Court, hearing appeals from orders dated 406/2024 and 633/2025, noted a prior direction that the trial be completed within six months. The parties submitted a joint pursis outlining detailed timelines for examination of witnesses, totaling twelve months for all parties. The Court …
The appellant, Deepak Shankar Agwane, filed an appeal against Order No. 383 of 2026 passed by the Mumbai Municipal Corporation. Counsel for the appellant sought the Court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The High Court, after hearing the request, allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the appeal …
Ashwini S. Thakur and an associate filed a first appeal (No. 1167 of 2025) before the High Court of Bombay against Vakil Durai Thakur and an associate. The appeal was listed for dismissal but the appellants failed to prosecute the proceedings. The Court observed that the appeal had not been pursued …
Ashwini S. Thakur and an associate filed a first appeal (No. 1167 of 2025) before the High Court of Bombay against Vakil Durai Thakur and an associate. The appeal was listed for dismissal but the appellants failed to prosecute the proceedings. The Court observed that the appeal had not been pursued …
The Lucky Star Co‑Operative Housing Society Ltd. appealed against an order that denied its request for an interim injunction restraining Defendant No.3 from encroaching on its plot (CTS No.854) at Jerbai Wadia Road, Mumbai. Defendant No.3 was carrying out a slum rehabilitation scheme on adjoining …
The appellant, Aditya Ajit Desai, filed an appeal against an order dated 2023 and a related interim application. Counsel for the appellant sought the court’s permission to withdraw the appeal. The High Court granted the request, disposing the appeal as withdrawn. Accordingly, the interim application …
The appellant, Aditya Ajit Desai, filed an appeal against Order No.132 of 2023 and also raised an interim application. The appellant, through counsel Ms. Nidhi Chawda (on behalf of Indira Labde), sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The High Court considered whether the appeal could be …
The appellants, M/s. Modern Trading Company & Anr., filed an appeal against Order No.315 of 2026 and an interim application. The court noted that the original suit had been disposed of on 24 April 2026, as evidenced by the order tendered by counsel. Since the suit was already concluded, the appeal …
The appellants, M/s. Modern Trading Company & Anr., filed an appeal against Order No.315 of 2026 and an interim application. The court noted that the original suit had been disposed of on 24 April 2026, as evidenced by the order tendered by counsel. Since the suit was already concluded, the appeal …
The appellant, Rajendra Mingel Koli, filed a first appeal against the Mumbai Municipal Corporation concerning the tenancy of certain premises. The appellant sought the court's permission to withdraw the appeal, requesting liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings to settle inter se rights regarding …
The petitioner, Francis Peter Fernandes, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and later sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel, granted the request and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. Consequently, there were no remaining …
The appellants, Ami Tech India Private Ltd. and another, appealed against an order dated 18 September 2023 that directed the defendants to disclose their movable and immovable property. The plaintiff’s counsel consented to the quashing of that disclosure direction and to filing a fresh application …
The appellants, three brothers, appealed against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) which had issued a notice under Section 351 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, alleging unauthorised vertical extension of their premises at Room No.2, Shakil Niwas CHS Ltd. The trial …
The appellant, Mrs. Shantadevi Yadav, sought interim relief for arrears of transit rent and specific performance of two Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements with the respondent, Pashmina Realty Pvt. Ltd., alleging the respondent had failed to pay rent after she handed over possession of two …
The appellant, owner of Shop No.1 in Pearl Mansion, challenged a notice issued by the Mumbai Municipal Corporation (MMC) under Section 351 of the MMC Act alleging unauthorized construction of a toilet and full loft. The trial court rejected the appellant's notice of motion, finding insufficient …
The Bombay City Civil Court had granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff, who was a caretaker of a deceased woman’s bungalow, pending a declaration of a will. The appellate court examined whether the caretaker possessed a legally protectable interest …
The plaintiff, a caretaker of the deceased Sushilaben Mistry, occupied a portion of a bungalow she was caring for since March 2021. After Sushilaben’s death, the defendants (her relatives) locked the premises and demanded the plaintiff vacate, prompting the plaintiff to seek an interim injunction to …
The appeal was filed by Sharmila Rajeshkumar Patel and another (appellants) against an order dismissing their notice of motion seeking Rs.10,00,000 in damages, Rs.15,000 per month as mesne profit, and appointment of a court commissioner in a suit concerning a share certificate owned by the …
The appellant, Mr. Rajbahadur, filed an appeal against a decree in a civil suit. The appellant's counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the underlying suit had already been disposed of. The High Court considered whether an appeal could be withdrawn after the …
The petitioners challenged the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal’s (MRT) order dismissing their revision application against a Sub‑Divisional Officer’s (SDO) order in Tenancy Appeal No. 13 of 2016. The original Section 32G application under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 sought …
The appellant Janardhan Hender Vaiti (deceased) and others filed an interim application in a second appeal to bring on record the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No. 2. The application was filed within the prescribed time limit. The court examined whether the amendment to include the heirs could …
The appellant, Himmatlal Ratanshi Patel, filed an appeal against a trial court order dated 23 February 2024. Counsel for the appellant sought the court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The High Court, after hearing the application, disposed of the appeal as withdrawn. The court expressly noted …
The applicant, Ashokkumar Manharlal Shah, filed an interim application seeking permission to deposit the entire decretal amount in the High Court rather than the trial court. The respondent, Ajaykumar Manharlal Shah, was absent despite notice. The court considered the request and found no objection, …
The appellant, a tenant of a ground‑floor tenement in Abubakar Estate, Dharavi, challenged the trial court’s order rejecting his notice of motion seeking protection against demolition of an alleged unauthorized structure. The Municipal Corporation had issued a notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai …
The appellant, a tenant of a ground‑floor tenement in Abubakar Estate, Dharavi, challenged the trial court's order rejecting his notice of motion seeking protection against demolition of an alleged unauthorized structure. The municipal corporation had issued a notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai …
The appellants filed an appeal against the trial court's order dated 15 June 2019 that dismissed their notice of motion. The trial had already commenced and evidence had been led before the trial court. The High Court, while hearing the appeal, directed the parties to maintain the status quo …
The petitioners, a family of six, challenged orders issued by MHADA directing them to obtain amended plans, allocate a 185 sq ft shop area to the Dave family, and surrender surplus built‑up area of 53.36 sq m to the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board. The orders were based on a …
The appellant, Ram Saket Co‑operative Housing Society Ltd., sought condonation of a 4,258‑day delay in filing a first appeal against an ex‑parte decree dated 10 April 2014. The delay stemmed from the society’s prolonged litigation under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC, which it pursued from 2014 until …
The appellants filed an appeal against Order No. 476 of 2026 and raised Interim Application No. 3727 of 2026 seeking a correction in the judgment dated 17 June 2026. The application specifically requested that the word "India" in the last line of paragraph 23 be replaced with "Mumbai". The Court …
The appellant, M/s. Satec Envir Engineering (India) Private Limited, filed an appeal against an order dated 709 of 2022. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant before the High Court. The Court observed that the appeal had not been prosecuted. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for …
The appellants, Mrs. Surinder Kaur Chhabara and Mr. Yashwant Sawant, appealed against the trial court’s order rejecting their interim injunction application in a suit concerning undivided shares of land originally owned by the late Merwan Feroze Cama. The suit sought specific performance of sale …
The appellant, Mr. Bans Bahadur Jaiswal, filed a special civil suit seeking a declaration that a notice issued by MHADA under Sections 52 and 53(1) of the MRTP Act was illegal and to restrain demolition of his alleged premises (CTS No.1‑2, Survey No.42). MHADA contended that the notice concerned an …
The petitioner challenged a 4 January 2018 order of the Grievance Redressal Committee that dismissed his appeal and held him ineligible. After that order, eviction proceedings were initiated, leading to a fresh inquiry and a subsequent order dated 8 June 2026 declaring the petitioner eligible. The …
The appellant, Polar Textiles and Fabrics Private Limited, filed an appeal against Order No. 277 of 2021 passed by the High Court of Bombay. The appellant, through counsel Ms. Namrata Vashisht, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The sole issue before the Court was whether the …
The appellant, Ali Waris, appealed an order refusing ad‑interim relief against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The High Court noted that the notice of motion itself was listed for hearing on 14 July 2026 and directed the parties to present arguments on that date. The Court ordered the …
The appellant, Ali Waris, appealed an order refusing ad‑interim relief against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The High Court noted that the notice of motion itself was listed for hearing on 14 July 2026 and directed the parties to present arguments on that date. The Court ordered the …
The appeal concerned the right, title and interest in a suit property slated for acquisition by the Municipal Corporation for road widening. The appellant, who is also the original plaintiff, argued that despite a pending title suit, he should be allowed to participate in the acquisition proceedings …
The appeal concerned the right, title and interest in a property slated for acquisition by the Municipal Corporation for road widening. The appellant, who is also the original plaintiff in a pending title suit, sought permission to participate in the acquisition proceedings and submit ownership …
Mrs. Nita Nilesh Bavishi appealed against the order rejecting her interim application for possession of the disputed property. The trial court later recorded that possession had been handed over to her under consent terms. The High Court noted that, since possession was already transferred, there …
The Court noted that Respondent No. 2 had complied with the order dated 30 April 2026. Accordingly, the writ petition was deemed disposed and listed for reporting compliance. No further orders were required. The petitioner was permitted to withdraw the amount deposited in the Registry. The judgment …
The applicant, Ramesh Builders, filed an appeal 14 days beyond the prescribed period and moved an interim application seeking condonation of the delay. The respondent did not oppose the application. The court examined the short duration of the delay and, finding no prejudice, decided to condone it. …
The applicant, Ravindra Narayan Dhamdhere, filed an interim application seeking a stay of execution and implementation of a judgment dated 3 April 2018 in a partition suit. The applicant argued that possession should not be handed over pending the hearing and final disposal of the second appeal. The …
The Union of India filed a praecipe before the Bombay High Court seeking correction of clerical errors in the minutes of order dated 18 April 2026. The court examined the specific amendments proposed, which included changes to case numbers, dates, wording, and punctuation. No substantive legal …
The appellant, Suresh Baldevdas Talreja, filed a civil appeal against Shivkumar Baldevdas Talreja and another respondent. During the hearing, the parties informed the Court that the dispute had been amicably settled and presented a written Consent Term. The Consent Term, signed by the parties and …
The appellant, M/s Casino Enterprises, filed a second appeal (No. 297 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court against a decree involving the respondents, Shri Deo Vithal Shett (deceased) and Mrs. Rajani Shett. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant, and the court noted the lack of prosecution …
The petitioners, Kothari Wheels Ltd. and a related firm, challenged a retrospective tariff differential bill of Rs 3,61,320 issued by MSEDCL after a spot inspection revealed that their premises were being used for automobile repair (a commercial activity) while they were being billed at an …
The petitioner, Shobha Narendra Painter, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents, including the Tahsildar, Murud Janjira. The petitioner’s counsel indicated uncertainty about whether a revision application had been filed before the Sub‑Divisional …
The petitioner, Jitendra Manohar Hane, challenged the order of the Appellate Authority which had only addressed the charges against him and modified the penalty, but failed to consider his request for a declaration that his suspension from 27 August 2017 to 25 July 2019 was invalid. The High Court …
The writ petition filed by H.A.L. Employee Co‑Op Credit Soc. Ltd. was listed for dismissal. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. Consequently, there were no pending applications to consider, and any such applications, if …
A writ petition (No. 2170 of 2023) was filed by Ramchandra Shivram Dhotre against the State of Maharashtra and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The petition was listed for dismissal and the Court dismissed it for non‑prosecution. Consequently, any pending applications, if …
The High Court considered an appeal against a judgment dated 2 July 2025 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner in an application filed under Section 47 of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The appellant, a trustee, contended that he was alive, had not received notice of the proceedings, …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The appellants, former Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, challenged eviction orders issued by the Eviction Officer under Section 28‑B of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. They argued that the eviction violated the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) filed by Air India employees challenging eviction orders issued by the Eviction Officer under Section 28‑B of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. The appellants, many belonging to SC/ST communities, argued that the …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) filed by Air India employees challenging eviction orders issued by the Eviction Officer under Section 28‑B of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. The appellants, many belonging to SC/ST communities, argued that the …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The applicants filed Interim Application No. 1598/2026 seeking to bring the legal heirs of a deceased respondent on record, set aside a prior abatement, and obtain condonation of delay. The court noted that in the related Second Appeal No. 131/2020 the legal heirs had already been brought on record …
The High Court of Bombay, in Second Appeal No. 216 of 2021 involving the Automotive Research Association of India as appellant/petitioner and Nandkumar Nivrutti Baptiwale as respondent, issued an order on 25 March 2026 to stand over the proceedings to 2 July 2026 due to paucity of time. No …
The appellants filed a civil application seeking a stay of the effect of an impugned judgment and order. No respondent appeared or filed a reply, and the court had earlier recorded that the status quo should be maintained. The second appeal had been admitted, and the court noted that without a stay …
The appellant, G. Chandra Shekaran, filed a first appeal before the High Court of Bombay against Shivshahi Punarvan Prakalp Ltd. and another respondent. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant passed away, and his death certificate was produced before the court. The learned counsel for the …
Bhausaheb Kadve, a 65‑year‑old senior citizen, filed an application under Section 22 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, alleging harassment by his wife and seeking ownership of two flats that he claims were purchased with his funds but titled in his wife’s name. …
The Bombay High Court considered a group of writ petitions challenging an appellate tribunal order that limited the levy of commercial electricity tariff to the date of a rent agreement dated 20 August 2019. The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, argued that the …
The Bombay High Court considered several writ petitions challenging an order that limited the levy of commercial electricity tariff to the date of a rent agreement (20 August 2019). The petitioners argued that the rent agreement was unregistered, unstamped, and insufficient to establish the …
The Bombay High Court considered a group of writ petitions challenging an order that limited the levy of commercial electricity tariff to the date of a rent agreement dated 20 August 2019. The petitioners, MSEDCL, argued that the rent agreement was unregistered, unstamped, and insufficient to …
The applicants filed Interim Application No. 1308 seeking recall of a conditional order dated 28 January 2026 that dismissed their first appeal for failure to remove office objections. The objection concerned the inclusion of legal heirs of pro forma defendants, which the applicants argued was not …
Petitioner Zahid Baig filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority and others. The petitioner, appearing in court, sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner made …
Mehendrakumar Mohanlal Ajmera filed Interim Application No. 1163 seeking condonation of a 69‑day delay in filing his First Appeal (Stamp) No. 35981 of 2025, claiming he only became aware of the impugned order on 25 September 2025 when a notice was posted. The respondents opposed, stating no …
The petitioner, a tenant of Shop No. 23‑A in Manaji Rajiji Chawl, Mumbai, challenged the ineligibility declared by MHADA on two grounds: the shop was not reflected in the 1995‑96 inspection extract and it lay beyond the building line. He argued that rent receipts dating back to 1971 and other …
M/s. Abhishek Impex Private Limited and another filed Writ Petition No. 14368 of 2023 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners did not appear before the Court on any of the occasions scheduled for hearing. No counsel appeared on …
The petitioners, a 100% grant‑in‑aid school, dismissed a teacher (Respondent No.1) in 2020 on the ground of alleged misconduct for providing false information about the number of his children, invoking the Maharashtra Civil Services (Declaration of Small Family) Rules, 2005. The School Tribunal …
The petitioner, Bhagwan Vaiku Shelar, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay. During the pendency of the case, the petitioner died in March 2024. No legal heirs or representatives appeared before the Court to take over the petition. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that there were no …
The petitioner, Moirae Generics Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay challenging the actions of the Assistant Commissioner, Food and Drug. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that he had not received any instructions from the petitioner to continue with the …
The High Court of Bombay, in Writ Petition No. 7310 of 2023 filed by Bhanudas Balasaheb Chorghe, issued a procedural order taking the petition on board and directing that the appearance be corrected as per an order dated 13 January 2026.
The petitioners filed Review Petition No. 35352 of 2025 seeking a review of the High Court's judgment dated 21 February 2025 in First Appeal No. 1841 of 2024. They engaged new counsel and raised fresh arguments concerning delay, readiness and willingness, and a third‑party claim, which were not …
