Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
65 judgments · newest first · showing 1–65
The applicant, Raj Chaudhary, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 2541 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The applicant’s counsel, Amandeep Singh and Tanvi Jain, were absent when the …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief in a criminal matter. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the application, although counsel for the State was present. The court dismissed the …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Ram Chandra and another seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The applicants were represented by counsel Suneel Kumar Singh Kalhans, Richa Srivastava and Shikha Srivastava, while the State was represented by …
The applicant Panchanan filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. An interim order had previously been granted in his favour, but the required steps to implement it were not taken. No counsel appeared for the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but failed to prosecute the application. No counsel appeared for the applicant or the second opposite party, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The High Court, noting the …
The petitioner, Raksh Pal Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 18010 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner or his counsel appeared to prosecute the petition, while counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and, after …
Pankaj Nemani filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 8388 of 2023) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. Notices were issued to the opposite parties, but they failed to take the required steps. The court noted the non‑compliance and dismissed the …
Satish Kumar filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application was listed before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or party appeared to argue or press the application on the scheduled date. …
The applicant, Mamta Shukla, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the State was present. The Court …
The applicant Bhoora @ Vimalesh and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No appearance was made on behalf of the petitioner. Consequently, the court found that the application could not be proceeded with. The judge dismissed the application …
Ajeet Verma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 954 of 2017) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The applicant failed to appear before the court to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The …
Gulshan Begam filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The applicant's counsel, Aditya Vikram Shahi, was absent and no request for adjournment was made. The High Court noted the absence of representation and the lack of any request to continue the …
The applicant, Shahajhan Khatun, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The matter was listed before Hon’ble Justice Manish Kumar. Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Aditya Vikram Shahi, was absent and no request for …
Shiv Ram Tiwari filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared for the applicant, while the Additional Government Advocate represented the State. An interim order had earlier been granted in favour of the …
An application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was filed by Umapati Tripathi and others against the State of U.P. The applicant's counsel did not appear before the court, although the Additional Government Advocate was present. The court examined whether the application could be …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was listed before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant, Haseena Bano, was represented by counsel Om Prakash Misra, while the State was represented by the Government Advocate. On the scheduled date, the applicant's counsel did not …
The applicant, Madeenul Hasan, filed an application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 529 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the State was present. The …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 9274 of 2021) was filed by Hemlata Singh against the State of U.P. and others. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and the lack of prosecution of the …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the application before the High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court …
The applicants, Dilip Kumar Gautam and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but the applicants failed to appear or prosecute the …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief. No petitioner appeared before the court to press the application, though counsel for the State was present. The High Court observed the lack of prosecution and …
The applicant, Shatrughan Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief in a criminal matter. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant, while counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the …
The petitioners, Smt. Seema Devi and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 2391 of 2016) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed for hearing on 5 August 2024, but no counsel …
Dr. Raj Kishore Shukla and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court held that in …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Sumit Jaiswal and others seeking relief against the State of U.P. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but none of the applicants appeared and no request for adjournment was made. The …
The applicant, Vinod Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief against the State. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the State’s counsel was present. The High Court observed that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's intervention in a criminal proceeding. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, although the State's Government Advocate was present. The Court observed the …
The applicant, Uma Kant, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023, seeking relief from the trial court. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the State was present. The High …
The applicant, Aditya Narayan Srivastav, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The application was to be heard before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel or party appeared to press the application before the court. Consequently, the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present. The Court noted the absence of …
The petitioners, Aslam Khan and others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 6824 of 2017) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter, originally filed in 2017, was listed before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court on 28 January …
The applicants Vipul Mishra and others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 2829 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The application was listed under Chapter 12 Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952. The court noted, via an office …
Surjan Kumar Maurya and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. The matter was listed for hearing, but the applicants failed to appear while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court noted the …
The applicant, Aslam Khan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a stay of the trial in Session Trial No.66/2024, which involved charges under Sections 498‑A, 302/34, 304‑B, 323/34, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He alleged that no …
Mohd. Asif and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The applicants' counsel, Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, was not present in court to press the application. No request for adjournment was made on behalf of …
The applicant, Major Sheshmani Nath Tripathi, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the …
Petitioner Brijesh Khanduri filed Writ Petition No. 9411 of 2020 before the Allahabad High Court challenging orders of the State of Uttar Pradesh, Forest Department. No petitioner appeared before the Court to pursue the petition. The State's counsel was present and argued the petition was pending. …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against United India Insurance Co. Ltd. No petitioner appeared before the court, and only counsel for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner to prosecute the petition. …
The applicants, Ranu and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a pending criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The …
Petitioners Rajesh Kumar Mishra and others filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 2442 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, while the respondents were represented. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. …
A writ petition (Writ-A No. 24974 of 2021) was filed by Paramdish Pandey against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. Consequently, …
Smt. Shobha Devi filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to intervene in the proceedings before the trial court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented …
Ishraq Ali filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The State's counsel was present and argued the petition. The Court held that a writ petition cannot …
The petitioners, Pratap Narain Gupta and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but they were not present in court. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, was present. The High Court observed that there was no …
The applicant, Ashish Vats, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue the application, while counsel for the State was …
Shiv Mangal Singh filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 18034 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. No petitioner appeared before the Court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief, but failed to appear before the court. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present and made submissions. The court held that the …
Petitioners Ashutosh Kumar Chaturvedi and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. No petitioner appeared before the court to press the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioners and the lack of any prosecution of the petition. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ-A No. 18667 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary, Basic Education, Lucknow. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was …
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No representative of the petitioner appeared to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State and the U.P. Basic Education Board were present. The Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, …
The petitioner, Smt. Asha Devi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to prosecute the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, …
The petitioners, Deepak Kumar and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. …
Ram Bilas Singh and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Employees Provident Fund Organisation. The petitioners' counsel was Mahendra Pratap Singh, while the respondents were represented by Gaurav Mehrotra, Akhilesh Pratap Singh, Asheesh Agnihotri, Shailendra …
The petitioner, Shri Bhagwat Singh, filed writ petition No. 1038 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 18173 of 2018) was filed by Surendra Kumar and others against the State of U.P. The petitioners failed to appear before the court, while counsel for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 18248 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. …
The petition was filed by C/M Janak Laghu Madhyamik Vidyalay through its Manager seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and its officials. No representative of the petitioner appeared before the Court to pursue the writ petition. The State's counsel was present and argued the matter. The …
The petitioner, Smt. Tara Devi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court, but failed to appear for prosecution. The State of U.P. was represented and present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim …
Petitioner Yogesh Shukla filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court, but failed to appear for prosecution. The State counsel was present, while no representative for the petitioner attended. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …
The petitioner, Arun Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondent, NABARD Mumbai. No representative of the petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. The State counsel was present, but the petition lacked prosecution. The court …
The petitioner, Amrendra Pratap Singh, filed Writ‑A No. 915 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. No representative of the petitioner appeared before the Court to press the petition. The State, represented by counsel, was present. The Court observed that the petition could not …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 940 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court. No representative of the petitioner appeared to prosecute the petition. Counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present. The Court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. Consequently, any …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 997 of 2019) was filed by Kuwar Singh Burman against the State of U.P. and others. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State and other respondents were present, as were the petitioner's advocates. The court dismissed the …
Petitioners Chaman Kumar Singh and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioners and the lack of any steps taken to advance the …
